  <vuln vid="158544f8-cf02-11f1-b0f1-d0f4051da3a3">
    <topic>vifm -- Unverified Ownership</topic>
    <affects>
    <package>
	<name>vifm</name>
	<range><lt>0.14.5</lt></range>
    </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>https://hackmd.io/@1ExmmukzRMWN7B4gQ4W-4Q/SkX7Pmiofg reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://hackmd.io/@1ExmmukzRMWN7B4gQ4W-4Q/SkX7Pmiofg">
	  <p>Vifm 0.8.1-beta through 0.14.4 reuses a pre-existing IPC FIFO in
the shared temporary directory without checking ownership, allowing
local users to execute commands as another user.  Attackers can
pre-create a world-writable vifm-ipc-vifm FIFO and write IPC packets
with -c and !  shell commands that execute with the victim's
privileges.</p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-110237</cvename>
      <url>https://cveawg.mitre.org/api/cve/CVE-2026-110237</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-10-13</discovery>
      <entry>2026-10-23</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="7db37b57-ced8-11f1-ac90-2cf05da270f3">
    <topic>Gitlab -- vulnerabilities</topic>
    <affects>
<package>
	<name>gitlab-ce</name>
	<name>gitlab-ee</name>
	<range><ge>19.5.0</ge><lt>19.5.1</lt></range>
	<range><ge>19.4.0</ge><lt>19.4.3</lt></range>
	<range><ge>7.0.0</ge><lt>19.3.6</lt></range>
</package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>Gitlab reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://docs.gitlab.com/releases/patches/patch-release-gitlab-19-5-1-released/?nav=19.5.1">
	  <p>Integer Overflow issue in Regular Expression Compiler impacts GitLab CE/EE</p>
	  <p>Improper Authentication issue in OmniAuth-to-LDAP auto-linking email lookup impacts GitLab CE/EE</p>
	  <p>Cache Poisoning issue in OAuth/OIDC discovery endpoints impacts GitLab CE/EE</p>
	  <p>Improper Access Control issue in GraphQL work item email address field impacts GitLab CE/EE</p>
	  <p>Incomplete enforcement of instance-wide SAML/LDAP membership lock allows unauthorized member additions in GitLab EE</p>
	  <p>Internal Credential Exposure issue in internal response headers impacts GitLab CE/EE</p>
	  <p>Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key issue in group milestones API impacts GitLab CE/EE</p>
	  <p>Use of Less Trusted Source issue in AI Gateway feature enablement header impacts GitLab EE</p>
	  <p>Use of Cache Containing Sensitive Information issue in merge request title rendering impacts GitLab CE/EE</p>
	  <p>Improper Access Control issue in merge request approval policy enforcement impacts GitLab EE</p>
	  <p>Improper Cleanup on Thrown Exception issue in security findings impacts GitLab EE</p>
	  <p>Improper Access Control issue in group Duo admin-lock enforcement for Amazon Q settings impacts GitLab EE</p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-110264</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-15723</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-112212</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-12664</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-16255</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-105777</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13319</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-112378</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-105711</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-14288</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-112326</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-103515</cvename>
      <url>https://docs.gitlab.com/releases/patches/patch-release-gitlab-19-5-1-released/?nav=19.5.1</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-10-21</discovery>
      <entry>2026-10-23</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="df4083bc-cea6-11f1-94b3-10ffe07f9334">
    <topic>mailpit -- Unbounded CPU and memory consumption in thumbnail endpoint via cyclic EXIF IFD chain</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
	<name>mailpit</name>
	<range><lt>1.32.0</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>Mailpit author reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://github.com/axllent/mailpit/security/advisories/GHSA-379p-g4f4-hq5h">
	  <p>The thumbnail endpoint GET
	  /api/v1/message/{ID}/part/{PartID}/thumb parses EXIF
	  metadata of image attachments with github.com/rwcarlsen/goexif
	  to apply orientation. goexif's TIFF IFD walker only detects
	  a self-referencing IFD (next == prev). An attachment whose
	  IFD chain forms a cycle of length 2 (IFD0 → IFD1 → IFD0)
	  sends the request handler into an infinite loop that
	  appends a new *tiff.Dir on every iteration. The goroutine
	  never terminates, pins one CPU core permanently, and its
	  live heap grows without bound. A 651-byte JPEG is
	  sufficient.</p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <url>https://github.com/axllent/mailpit/security/advisories/GHSA-379p-g4f4-hq5h</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-10-23</discovery>
      <entry>2026-10-23</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="5101359e-ce3c-11f1-bf7a-3c7c3fba4204">
    <topic>Keycloak -- multiple vulnerabilities</topic>
    <affects>
	<package>
	  <name>keycloak</name>
	  <range><lt>26.8.1</lt></range>
	</package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>The Keycloak Team reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://www.keycloak.org/2026/10/keycloak-2681-released">
	  <ul>
	    <li>[CVE-2026-15943]: OIDC identity provider update reuses masked client secret after token URL changes.</li>
	    <li>[CVE-2026-18569]: OIDC broker backchannel logout accepts unsigned forged logout tokens when signature validation is disabled.</li>
	    <li>[CVE-2026-82968]: Persistent wrong-account linking through null / GitHub identity provider.</li>
	    <li>[CVE-2026-94001]: Admin credential DELETE bypasses denied reset-password permission.</li>
	    <li>[CVE-2026-94000]: A delegated admin with only `manage-users` can become `realm-admin` by joining (or being created into) a group that maps an admin role.</li>
	    <li>[CVE-2026-94218]: 2FA setup enforcement bypass via /realms/{realm}/login-actions/restart — #YWH-PGM40475-254</li>
	    <li>[CVE-2026-94215]: Cross-realm realm resource read/write via per-request session-level cache in RealmCacheSession.</li>
	    <li>[CVE-2026-94213]: Missing user view authorization in the Authorization Services policy evaluation endpoint, possible incomplete fix of CVE-2026-37978.</li>
	    <li>[CVE-2026-94217]: UMA scope merge across resource owners via name collision in resolveResourcePermission.</li>
	    <li>[CVE-2026-96446]: Security vulnerability in Keycloak 26.7.3 — PAR single-use bypass via prompt=none.</li>
	    <li>[CVE-2026-96445]: Conditional OTP trusts skip headers on untrusted proxy paths.</li>
	    <li>[CVE-2026-97177]: Generic user update bypasses denied reset-password permission.</li>
	    <li>[CVE-2026-95503]: Potential KDC spoofing attack when Kerberos password authentication is enabled.</li>
	    <li>[CVE-2026-97311]: Broken access control in Admin REST API: roles/{role-name}/groups discloses groups the caller cannot view (incomplete fix of the 26.7.2 hardening).</li>
	    <li>[CVE-2026-97846]: Standard Token Exchange bypasses required mTLS certificate binding and issues an active bearer token when no client certificate is supplied.</li>
	    <li>[CVE-2026-101333]: Unbounded metric series creation via idp tag on broker login endpoint.</li>
	    <li>[CVE-2026-91777]: Third-party dependency fix, com.fasterxml.jackson.core:jackson-databind</li>
	    <li>Multiple CVEs in third-party dependency tools.jackson.core:jackson-databind</li>
	    <li>[CVE-2026-103884]: Path traversal via X.509 CRL Distribution Point - client-supplied CRL path escapes $KC_HOME/conf</li>
	    <li>Multiple CVEs in third-party dependency simple-git.</li>
	    <li>Flaky test: initial-access.spec.ts 'Initial access token' fails with TypeError on table data read.</li>
	    <li>[CVE-2026-107121]: SMTP starttls=true permits plaintext credential and message downgrade.</li>
	  </ul>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-15943</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-18569</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-82968</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-94001</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-94000</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-94218</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-94215</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-94213</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-94217</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-96446</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-96445</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-97177</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-95503</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-97311</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-97846</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-101333</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-103884</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-107121</cvename>
      <url>https://www.keycloak.org/2026/10/keycloak-2681-released</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-10-13</discovery>
      <entry>2026-10-22</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="f4f0bb8d-ce20-11f1-9bfa-a8a1599412c6">
    <topic>chromium -- security fixes</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
       <name>chromium</name>
       <range><lt>156.0.8078.47</lt></range>
      </package>
      <package>
       <name>ungoogled-chromium</name>
       <range><lt>156.0.8078.47</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
       <p>Chrome Releases reports:</p>
       <blockquote cite="https://chromereleases.googleblog.com/2026/10/stable-channel-update-for-desktop_02018666648.html">
	 <p>This update includes 353 security fixes:</p>
	 <ul>
	    <li>Critical CVE-2026-113341: Memory corruption in Skia.</li>
	    <li>Critical CVE-2026-113279: Memory corruption in Accessibility.</li>
	    <li>Critical CVE-2026-113072: Memory corruption in CSS.</li>
	    <li>Critical CVE-2026-113280: Memory corruption in Paint.</li>
	    <li>Critical CVE-2026-113271: Use after free in Accessibility.</li>
	    <li>Critical CVE-2026-113303: Memory corruption in WebRTC.</li>
	    <li>High CVE-2026-113101: Use after free in SiteIsolation.</li>
	    <li>High CVE-2026-113097: Use after free in FileSystem.</li>
	    <li>High CVE-2026-113098: Memory corruption in CacheStorage.</li>
	    <li>High CVE-2026-113242: Memory corruption in ANGLE.</li>
	    <li>High CVE-2026-113058: Use after free in WebUI.</li>
	    <li>High CVE-2026-113082: Memory corruption in ANGLE.</li>
	    <li>High CVE-2026-113119: Use after free in Network.</li>
	    <li>High CVE-2026-113092: Use after free in Passwords.</li>
	    <li>High CVE-2026-113134: Memory corruption in ANGLE.</li>
	    <li>High CVE-2026-113339: Use after free in SVG.</li>
	    <li>High CVE-2026-113317: Memory corruption in Accessibility.</li>
	    <li>High CVE-2026-113193: Memory corruption in V8.</li>
	    <li>High CVE-2026-113117: Improper input validation in ANGLE.</li>
	    <li>High CVE-2026-113188: Memory corruption in GPU.</li>
	    <li>High CVE-2026-113104: Memory corruption in Frames.</li>
	    <li>High CVE-2026-113322: Memory corruption in Dawn.</li>
	    <li>High CVE-2026-113163: Use after free in WebGL.</li>
	    <li>High CVE-2026-113253: Use after free in Canvas.</li>
	    <li>High CVE-2026-113298: Use after free in Transactions Platform.</li>
	    <li>High CVE-2026-113315: Memory corruption in ANGLE.</li>
	    <li>High CVE-2026-113236: Use after free in Navigation.</li>
	    <li>High CVE-2026-113284: Memory corruption in XML.</li>
	    <li>High CVE-2026-113141: Use after free in Transactions Platform.</li>
	    <li>High CVE-2026-113316: Improper input validation in Views.</li>
	    <li>High CVE-2026-113234: Memory corruption in ANGLE.</li>
	    <li>High CVE-2026-113252: Improper input validation in ANGLE.</li>
	    <li>High CVE-2026-113305: Use after free in Privacy.</li>
	    <li>High CVE-2026-113044: Use after free in V8.</li>
	    <li>High CVE-2026-113135: Memory corruption in PictureInPicture.</li>
	    <li>High CVE-2026-113266: Memory corruption in ANGLE.</li>
	    <li>High CVE-2026-113273: Memory corruption in ANGLE.</li>
	    <li>High CVE-2026-113293: Use after free in ANGLE.</li>
	    <li>High CVE-2026-113225: Memory corruption in Browser.</li>
	    <li>High CVE-2026-113210: Use after free in ANGLE.</li>
	    <li>High CVE-2026-113285: Memory corruption in ANGLE.</li>
	    <li>High CVE-2026-113324: Use after free in GPU.</li>
	    <li>High CVE-2026-113334: Improper input validation in ANGLE.</li>
	    <li>High CVE-2026-113020: Improper input validation in Date.</li>
	    <li>High CVE-2026-113222: Use after free in V8.</li>
	    <li>High CVE-2026-113318: Memory corruption in ServiceWorker.</li>
	    <li>High CVE-2026-113310: Out of bounds read in Bluetooth.</li>
	    <li>High CVE-2026-113338: Use after free in Turbolev.</li>
	    <li>High CVE-2026-113093: Memory corruption in DisplayLocking.</li>
	    <li>High CVE-2026-113012: Improper input validation in GPU.</li>
	    <li>High CVE-2026-113175: Improper input validation in FileSystem.</li>
	    <li>High CVE-2026-113192: Memory corruption in V8.</li>
	    <li>High CVE-2026-113309: Out of bounds read in Media.</li>
	    <li>High CVE-2026-113295: Out of bounds read in ANGLE.</li>
	    <li>High CVE-2026-113217: Use after free in WebAppInstalls.</li>
	    <li>High CVE-2026-113040: Improper input validation in Proxy.</li>
	    <li>High CVE-2026-113161: Use after free in WebRTC.</li>
	    <li>High CVE-2026-113154: Memory corruption in Canvas.</li>
	    <li>High CVE-2026-113336: Memory corruption in Compositing.</li>
	    <li>High CVE-2026-113181: Use after free in Navigation.</li>
	    <li>High CVE-2026-113019: Use after free in Turbolev.</li>
	    <li>High CVE-2026-113095: Out of bounds read in Focus.</li>
	    <li>High CVE-2026-113160: Use after free in Turbolev.</li>
	    <li>High CVE-2026-113212: Memory corruption in PDF.</li>
	    <li>High CVE-2026-113000: Memory corruption in Paint.</li>
	    <li>High CVE-2026-113179: Use after free in Paint.</li>
	    <li>High CVE-2026-112993: Use after free in Input.</li>
	    <li>Medium CVE-2026-113055: Type confusion in FullScreen.</li>
	    <li>Medium CVE-2026-113068: Use after free in Input.</li>
	    <li>Medium CVE-2026-113320: Memory corruption in Navigation.</li>
	    <li>Medium CVE-2026-113231: Improper input validation in Extensions.</li>
	    <li>Medium CVE-2026-113174: Use after free in Extensions.</li>
	    <li>Medium CVE-2026-113022: Memory corruption in PDFium.</li>
	    <li>Medium CVE-2026-113079: Use after free in SiteIsolation.</li>
	    <li>Medium CVE-2026-113191: Use after free in Internals.</li>
	    <li>Medium CVE-2026-113250: Use after free in ANGLE.</li>
	    <li>Medium CVE-2026-113109: Memory corruption in API.</li>
	    <li>Medium CVE-2026-113113: Use after free in Extensions.</li>
	    <li>Medium CVE-2026-113069: Memory corruption in Compositing.</li>
	    <li>Medium CVE-2026-113006: Out of bounds read in Navigation.</li>
	    <li>Medium CVE-2026-113263: Use after free in Core.</li>
	    <li>Medium CVE-2026-113018: Memory corruption in IME.</li>
	    <li>Medium CVE-2026-113301: Memory corruption in WebAppInstalls.</li>
	    <li>Medium CVE-2026-113034: Memory corruption in FileSystem.</li>
	    <li>Medium CVE-2026-113094: Memory corruption in API.</li>
	    <li>Medium CVE-2026-113240: Use after free in Chromecast.</li>
	    <li>Medium CVE-2026-113102: Out of bounds read in FileSystem.</li>
	    <li>Medium CVE-2026-113142: Memory corruption in Extensions.</li>
	    <li>Medium CVE-2026-113281: Memory corruption in SiteIsolation.</li>
	    <li>Medium CVE-2026-113035: Out of bounds read in API.</li>
	    <li>Medium CVE-2026-113211: Memory corruption in ServiceWorker.</li>
	    <li>Medium CVE-2026-113011: Use after free in CredentialProvider.</li>
	    <li>Medium CVE-2026-113198: Use after free in Extensions.</li>
	    <li>Medium CVE-2026-113257: Memory corruption in Media.</li>
	    <li>Medium CVE-2026-113070: Out of bounds read in GetUserMedia.</li>
	    <li>Medium CVE-2026-113176: Memory corruption in Omnibox.</li>
	    <li>Medium CVE-2026-113150: Memory corruption in Bindings.</li>
	    <li>Medium CVE-2026-113311: Use after free in ServiceWorker.</li>
	    <li>Medium CVE-2026-113078: Improper input validation in Compositing.</li>
	    <li>Medium CVE-2026-113033: Use after free in Streaming.</li>
	    <li>Medium CVE-2026-113026: Memory corruption in PDF.</li>
	    <li>Medium CVE-2026-113302: Use after free in Extensions.</li>
	    <li>Medium CVE-2026-113164: Memory corruption in Voice.</li>
	    <li>Medium CVE-2026-113239: Range error in SiteIsolation.</li>
	    <li>Medium CVE-2026-113131: Memory corruption in Bluetooth.</li>
	    <li>Medium CVE-2026-113333: Memory corruption in Extensions.</li>
	    <li>Medium CVE-2026-113147: Improper input validation in WebShare.</li>
	    <li>Medium CVE-2026-113337: Memory corruption in Scroll.</li>
	    <li>Medium CVE-2026-113127: Memory corruption in Browser.</li>
	    <li>Medium CVE-2026-113129: Improper access control in Extensions.</li>
	    <li>Medium CVE-2026-113264: Improper input validation in Extensions.</li>
	    <li>Medium CVE-2026-113105: Use after free in Extensions.</li>
	    <li>Medium CVE-2026-113220: Memory corruption in Extensions.</li>
	    <li>Medium CVE-2026-113275: Use after free in API.</li>
	    <li>Medium CVE-2026-113283: Memory corruption in CredentialProvider.</li>
	    <li>Medium CVE-2026-113014: Use after free in PerformanceAPIs.</li>
	    <li>Medium CVE-2026-113108: Use after free in Script.</li>
	    <li>Medium CVE-2026-113343: Memory corruption in Sandbox.</li>
	    <li>Medium CVE-2026-113319: Use after free in Accessibility.</li>
	    <li>Medium CVE-2026-113057: Improper access control in ComputePressure.</li>
	    <li>Medium CVE-2026-113219: Memory corruption in Contacts.</li>
	    <li>Medium CVE-2026-113005: Memory corruption in Bluetooth.</li>
	    <li>Medium CVE-2026-113209: Memory corruption in Navigation.</li>
	    <li>Medium CVE-2026-113166: Memory corruption in History.</li>
	    <li>Medium CVE-2026-113051: Memory corruption in CSS.</li>
	    <li>Medium CVE-2026-113196: Improper access control in Mobile.</li>
	    <li>Medium CVE-2026-113003: Memory corruption in HID.</li>
	    <li>Medium CVE-2026-113155: Use after free in Glic.</li>
	    <li>Medium CVE-2026-113290: Use after free in Input.</li>
	    <li>Medium CVE-2026-113183: Memory corruption in FedCM.</li>
	    <li>Medium CVE-2026-113289: Improper input validation in PerformanceAPIs.</li>
	    <li>Medium CVE-2026-113146: Memory corruption in PerformanceAPIs.</li>
	    <li>Medium CVE-2026-113207: Use after free in SiteIsolation.</li>
	    <li>Medium CVE-2026-113205: Use after free in Variations.</li>
	    <li>Medium CVE-2026-113162: Improper input validation in Actor.</li>
	    <li>Medium CVE-2026-113118: Memory corruption in Extensions.</li>
	    <li>Medium CVE-2026-113232: Memory corruption in Search.</li>
	    <li>Medium CVE-2026-113327: Use after free in Chromecast.</li>
	    <li>Medium CVE-2026-112999: Use after free in API.</li>
	    <li>Medium CVE-2026-113249: Improper input validation in Mobile.</li>
	    <li>Medium CVE-2026-113272: Memory corruption in Extensions.</li>
	    <li>Medium CVE-2026-113112: Use after free in Extensions.</li>
	    <li>Medium CVE-2026-113321: Use after free in Extensions.</li>
	    <li>Medium CVE-2026-113059: Memory corruption in Sensor.</li>
	    <li>Medium CVE-2026-113137: Memory corruption in Extensions.</li>
	    <li>Medium CVE-2026-113208: Use after free in ContextualSearch.</li>
	    <li>Medium CVE-2026-113238: Memory corruption in CustomTabs.</li>
	    <li>Medium CVE-2026-113194: Memory corruption in Core.</li>
	    <li>Medium CVE-2026-113189: Use after free in Core.</li>
	    <li>Medium CVE-2026-113060: Improper input validation in Bluetooth.</li>
	    <li>Medium CVE-2026-113115: Use after free in Transactions Platform.</li>
	    <li>Medium CVE-2026-113045: Out of bounds read in Offline.</li>
	    <li>Medium CVE-2026-113307: Memory corruption in Extensions.</li>
	    <li>Medium CVE-2026-113009: Use after free in WindowControlsOverlay.</li>
	    <li>Medium CVE-2026-113071: Use after free in Notifications.</li>
	    <li>Medium CVE-2026-113278: Use after free in Extensions.</li>
	    <li>Medium CVE-2026-113190: Use after free in ServiceWorker.</li>
	    <li>Medium CVE-2026-112992: Memory corruption in Canvas.</li>
	    <li>Medium CVE-2026-112995: Use after free in Animation.</li>
	    <li>Medium CVE-2026-113261: Use after free in WebAppInstalls.</li>
	    <li>Medium CVE-2026-113172: Memory corruption in ServiceWorker.</li>
	    <li>Medium CVE-2026-113332: Memory corruption in GPU.</li>
	    <li>Medium CVE-2026-113262: Use after free in Extensions.</li>
	    <li>Medium CVE-2026-113149: Memory corruption in FullScreen.</li>
	    <li>Medium CVE-2026-113206: Memory corruption in Omnibox.</li>
	    <li>Medium CVE-2026-113185: Memory corruption in Extensions.</li>
	    <li>Medium CVE-2026-113171: Memory corruption in Prompts.</li>
	    <li>Medium CVE-2026-113042: Use after free in Extensions.</li>
	    <li>Medium CVE-2026-113276: Memory corruption in Passwords.</li>
	    <li>Medium CVE-2026-113218: Use after free in DataTransfer.</li>
	    <li>Medium CVE-2026-113195: Improper input validation in Downloads.</li>
	    <li>Medium CVE-2026-113328: Improper input validation in Privacy.</li>
	    <li>Medium CVE-2026-113335: Memory corruption in Extensions.</li>
	    <li>Medium CVE-2026-113255: Use after free in CustomTabs.</li>
	    <li>Medium CVE-2026-113076: Use after free in Toolbar.</li>
	    <li>Medium CVE-2026-113325: Memory corruption in SignIn.</li>
	    <li>Medium CVE-2026-113084: Improper input validation in Permissions.</li>
	    <li>Medium CVE-2026-113308: Use after free in Core.</li>
	    <li>Medium CVE-2026-113224: Memory corruption in WebAppInstalls.</li>
	    <li>Medium CVE-2026-113148: Memory corruption in WebUI.</li>
	    <li>Medium CVE-2026-113010: Out of bounds read in Extensions.</li>
	    <li>Medium CVE-2026-113073: Use after free in Browser.</li>
	    <li>Medium CVE-2026-113265: Memory corruption in BFCache.</li>
	    <li>Medium CVE-2026-113329: Out of bounds read in Installer.</li>
	    <li>Medium CVE-2026-113043: Use after free in iOSWeb.</li>
	    <li>Medium CVE-2026-113202: Use after free in BrowserTag.</li>
	    <li>Medium CVE-2026-113016: Improper input validation in Extensions.</li>
	    <li>Medium CVE-2026-113246: Memory corruption in iOSWebView.</li>
	    <li>Medium CVE-2026-113041: Use after free in Actor.</li>
	    <li>Medium CVE-2026-113126: Memory corruption in PolicyContainer.</li>
	    <li>Medium CVE-2026-113031: Memory corruption in Media.</li>
	    <li>Medium CVE-2026-113081: Use after free in Compositing.</li>
	    <li>Medium CVE-2026-113139: Memory corruption in Autofill.</li>
	    <li>Medium CVE-2026-113128: Missing authorization in Animation.</li>
	    <li>Medium CVE-2026-113049: Memory corruption in Core.</li>
	    <li>Medium CVE-2026-113032: Memory corruption in Omnibox.</li>
	    <li>Medium CVE-2026-113204: Use after free in TrustedWebActivities.</li>
	    <li>Medium CVE-2026-113144: Memory corruption in Speech.</li>
	    <li>Medium CVE-2026-113054: Out of bounds read in SiteIsolation.</li>
	    <li>Medium CVE-2026-113123: Use after free in GPU.</li>
	    <li>Medium CVE-2026-113277: Out of bounds read in CustomTabs.</li>
	    <li>Medium CVE-2026-113136: Memory corruption in DevTools.</li>
	    <li>Medium CVE-2026-113106: Memory corruption in Skia.</li>
	    <li>Medium CVE-2026-113001: Use after free in Workers.</li>
	    <li>Medium CVE-2026-113064: Memory corruption in OptimizationGuide.</li>
	    <li>Medium CVE-2026-113243: Memory corruption in DOM.</li>
	    <li>Medium CVE-2026-113326: Memory corruption in Core.</li>
	    <li>Medium CVE-2026-113124: Memory corruption in DataTransfer.</li>
	    <li>Medium CVE-2026-113230: Improper input validation in Browser.</li>
	    <li>Medium CVE-2026-113090: Memory corruption in Interstitials.</li>
	    <li>Medium CVE-2026-113158: Use after free in Streaming.</li>
	    <li>Medium CVE-2026-113077: Memory corruption in Core.</li>
	    <li>Medium CVE-2026-113282: Use after free in Views.</li>
	    <li>Medium CVE-2026-113165: Use after free in Core.</li>
	    <li>Medium CVE-2026-113178: Memory corruption in Views.</li>
	    <li>Medium CVE-2026-113110: Memory corruption in ShadowDOM.</li>
	    <li>Medium CVE-2026-113007: Memory corruption in Permissions.</li>
	    <li>Medium CVE-2026-113187: Use after free in DOM.</li>
	    <li>Medium CVE-2026-113075: Use after free in DevTools.</li>
	    <li>Medium CVE-2026-113259: Use after free in Frames.</li>
	    <li>Medium CVE-2026-113228: Use after free in Network.</li>
	    <li>Medium CVE-2026-113099: Improper input validation in Omnibox.</li>
	    <li>Medium CVE-2026-113216: Use after free in Navigation.</li>
	    <li>Medium CVE-2026-113270: Use after free in Internals.</li>
	    <li>Medium CVE-2026-113087: Use after free in Actor.</li>
	    <li>Medium CVE-2026-113267: Memory corruption in Video.</li>
	    <li>Medium CVE-2026-113304: Memory corruption in GPU.</li>
	    <li>Medium CVE-2026-113177: Use after free in FileSystem.</li>
	    <li>Medium CVE-2026-113151: Out of bounds read in Actor.</li>
	    <li>Medium CVE-2026-113028: Use after free in Media.</li>
	    <li>Medium CVE-2026-113120: Improper input validation in Media.</li>
	    <li>Medium CVE-2026-112997: Memory corruption in CSS.</li>
	    <li>Medium CVE-2026-113037: Use after free in WebSockets.</li>
	    <li>Medium CVE-2026-113153: Memory corruption in SiteIsolation.</li>
	    <li>Medium CVE-2026-113138: Memory corruption in WebAppInstalls.</li>
	    <li>Medium CVE-2026-113030: Improper access control in V8.</li>
	    <li>Medium CVE-2026-113100: Memory corruption in Audio.</li>
	    <li>Medium CVE-2026-113221: Use after free in Google Lens.</li>
	    <li>Medium CVE-2026-113344: Use after free in Performance.</li>
	    <li>Medium CVE-2026-113342: Memory corruption in Network.</li>
	    <li>Medium CVE-2026-113159: Improper access control in DevTools.</li>
	    <li>Medium CVE-2026-113233: Out of bounds read in Core.</li>
	    <li>Medium CVE-2026-113065: Use after free in Media.</li>
	    <li>Medium CVE-2026-113002: Memory corruption in Transactions Platform.</li>
	    <li>Medium CVE-2026-113199: Out of bounds read in Payments.</li>
	    <li>Medium CVE-2026-113197: Use after free in Forms.</li>
	    <li>Medium CVE-2026-113203: Use after free in CSS.</li>
	    <li>Medium CVE-2026-113170: Use after free in Autofill.</li>
	    <li>Medium CVE-2026-113258: Memory corruption in Chromoting.</li>
	    <li>Medium CVE-2026-113297: Improper access control in Ozone.</li>
	    <li>Medium CVE-2026-113062: Improper input validation in API.</li>
	    <li>Medium CVE-2026-113096: Memory corruption in Text.</li>
	    <li>Medium CVE-2026-113050: Out of bounds read in HID.</li>
	    <li>Medium CVE-2026-113008: Memory corruption in Transactions Platform.</li>
	    <li>Medium CVE-2026-113111: Use after free in Compositing.</li>
	    <li>Medium CVE-2026-113200: Use after free in ANGLE.</li>
	    <li>Medium CVE-2026-113143: Memory corruption in ANGLE.</li>
	    <li>Medium CVE-2026-113157: Information leak in ANGLE.</li>
	    <li>Medium CVE-2026-113235: Improper input validation in Passwords.</li>
	    <li>Medium CVE-2026-113089: Improper input validation in PrintPreview.</li>
	    <li>Medium CVE-2026-113340: Memory corruption in ANGLE.</li>
	    <li>Medium CVE-2026-113052: Memory corruption in V8.</li>
	    <li>Medium CVE-2026-113133: Memory corruption in PlatformIntegration.</li>
	    <li>Medium CVE-2026-113086: Improper input validation in Input.</li>
	    <li>Low CVE-2026-113251: Use after free in PDF.</li>
	    <li>Low CVE-2026-113215: Use after free in Extensions.</li>
	    <li>Low CVE-2026-113053: Use after free in Cookies.</li>
	    <li>Low CVE-2026-113312: Memory corruption in Autofill.</li>
	    <li>Low CVE-2026-113323: Use after free in Chrome for iOS.</li>
	    <li>Low CVE-2026-113114: Use after free in SignIn.</li>
	    <li>Low CVE-2026-113015: Use after free in Workers.</li>
	    <li>Low CVE-2026-113091: Use after free in PerformanceAPIs.</li>
	    <li>Low CVE-2026-113168: Use after free in Permissions.</li>
	    <li>Low CVE-2026-113229: Use after free in Loader.</li>
	    <li>Low CVE-2026-113256: Use after free in Permissions.</li>
	    <li>Low CVE-2026-113103: Use after free in WebProtect.</li>
	    <li>Low CVE-2026-113056: Memory corruption in PerformanceAPIs.</li>
	    <li>Low CVE-2026-113201: Memory corruption in Google Lens.</li>
	    <li>Low CVE-2026-113027: Memory corruption in WebFonts.</li>
	    <li>Low CVE-2026-113214: Improper input validation in FullScreen.</li>
	    <li>Low CVE-2026-113004: Memory corruption in Sync.</li>
	    <li>Low CVE-2026-113300: Out of bounds write in Forms.</li>
	    <li>Low CVE-2026-113213: Memory corruption in DevTools.</li>
	    <li>Low CVE-2026-113167: Memory corruption in Network.</li>
	    <li>Low CVE-2026-113223: Memory corruption in DevTools.</li>
	    <li>Low CVE-2026-113291: Memory corruption in FullScreen.</li>
	    <li>Low CVE-2026-113241: Memory corruption in Toolbar.</li>
	    <li>Low CVE-2026-113244: Improper input validation in UI.</li>
	    <li>Low CVE-2026-113048: Memory corruption in DevTools.</li>
	    <li>Low CVE-2026-113247: Memory corruption in DevTools.</li>
	    <li>Low CVE-2026-113023: Improper input validation in Extensions.</li>
	    <li>Low CVE-2026-113330: Memory corruption in CustomTabs.</li>
	    <li>Low CVE-2026-113226: Memory corruption in Model.</li>
	    <li>Low CVE-2026-113152: Memory corruption in SignIn.</li>
	    <li>Low CVE-2026-113029: Improper access control in ANGLE.</li>
	    <li>Low CVE-2026-113296: Memory corruption in Actor.</li>
	    <li>Low CVE-2026-113306: Improper input validation in Network.</li>
	    <li>Low CVE-2026-113245: Memory corruption in DevTools.</li>
	    <li>Low CVE-2026-113299: Memory corruption in WebProtect.</li>
	    <li>Low CVE-2026-113024: Use after free in WebAppInstalls.</li>
	    <li>Low CVE-2026-113025: Use after free in Input.</li>
	    <li>Low CVE-2026-113080: Use after free in WebAppInstalls.</li>
	    <li>Low CVE-2026-113186: Memory corruption in DevTools.</li>
	    <li>Low CVE-2026-113180: Memory corruption in ContentCapture.</li>
	    <li>Low CVE-2026-113140: Use after free in ANGLE.</li>
	    <li>Low CVE-2026-113184: Memory corruption in Scheduling.</li>
	    <li>Low CVE-2026-113017: Use after free in Views.</li>
	    <li>Low CVE-2026-112998: Memory corruption in Views.</li>
	    <li>Low CVE-2026-113021: Use after free in WebAppInstalls.</li>
	    <li>Low CVE-2026-113145: Memory corruption in Messages.</li>
	    <li>Low CVE-2026-113292: Improper input validation in Omnibox.</li>
	    <li>Low CVE-2026-113156: Use after free in Messages.</li>
	    <li>Low CVE-2026-113116: Use after free in DevTools.</li>
	    <li>Low CVE-2026-113047: Memory corruption in BrowserTag.</li>
	    <li>Low CVE-2026-113173: Improper input validation in UI.</li>
	    <li>Low CVE-2026-113260: Memory corruption in Core.</li>
	    <li>Low CVE-2026-113269: Memory corruption in BrowserTag.</li>
	    <li>Low CVE-2026-113036: Memory corruption in HTML.</li>
	    <li>Low CVE-2026-113268: Memory corruption in Navigation.</li>
	    <li>Low CVE-2026-113038: Memory corruption in DevTools.</li>
	    <li>Low CVE-2026-113313: Memory corruption in DevTools.</li>
	    <li>Low CVE-2026-113061: Memory corruption in Chromoting.</li>
	    <li>Low CVE-2026-113248: Memory corruption in FileSystem.</li>
	    <li>Low CVE-2026-113288: Memory corruption in Core.</li>
	    <li>Low CVE-2026-113085: Use after free in Media.</li>
	    <li>Low CVE-2026-113107: Use after free in Media.</li>
	    <li>Low CVE-2026-113066: Memory corruption in Fonts.</li>
	    <li>Low CVE-2026-113121: Memory corruption in ContextMenu.</li>
	    <li>Low CVE-2026-113287: Use after free in Prompts.</li>
	    <li>Low CVE-2026-113132: Memory corruption in DevTools.</li>
	    <li>Low CVE-2026-113169: Memory corruption in WebAppInstalls.</li>
	    <li>Low CVE-2026-113254: Memory corruption in DevTools.</li>
	    <li>Low CVE-2026-113063: Improper input validation in Chromoting.</li>
	    <li>Low CVE-2026-112994: Memory corruption in Browser.</li>
	    <li>Low CVE-2026-113314: Use after free in Media.</li>
	    <li>Low CVE-2026-113237: Memory corruption in Chromoting.</li>
	    <li>Low CVE-2026-113331: Memory corruption in Controls.</li>
	    <li>Low CVE-2026-113182: Memory corruption in Passwords.</li>
	    <li>Low CVE-2026-113046: Improper input validation in Passwords.</li>
	    <li>Low CVE-2026-113067: Use after free in Chromoting.</li>
	    <li>Low CVE-2026-113074: Use after free in Media.</li>
	    <li>Low CVE-2026-113130: Use after free in Actor.</li>
	    <li>Low CVE-2026-113294: Improper input validation in Loader.</li>
	    <li>Low CVE-2026-112996: Memory corruption in Loader.</li>
	    <li>Low CVE-2026-113122: Memory corruption in Loader.</li>
	    <li>Low CVE-2026-113227: Use after free in Editing.</li>
	    <li>Low CVE-2026-113286: Memory corruption in Google Lens.</li>
	    <li>Low CVE-2026-113083: Memory corruption in Actor.</li>
	    <li>Low CVE-2026-113088: Memory corruption in Mobile.</li>
	    <li>Low CVE-2026-113013: Memory corruption in DevTools.</li>
	    <li>Low CVE-2026-113125: Memory corruption in DevTools.</li>
	    <li>Low CVE-2026-113039: Use after free in Bookmarks.</li>
	    <li>Low CVE-2026-113274: Use after free in ReadingMode.</li>
	 </ul>
       </blockquote>
      </body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113341</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113279</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113072</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113280</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113271</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113303</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113101</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113097</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113098</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113242</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113058</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113082</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113119</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113092</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113134</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113339</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113317</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113193</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113117</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113188</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113104</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113322</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113163</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113253</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113298</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113315</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113236</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113284</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113141</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113316</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113234</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113252</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113305</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113044</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113135</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113266</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113273</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113293</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113225</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113210</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113285</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113324</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113334</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113020</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113222</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113318</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113310</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113338</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113093</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113012</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113175</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113192</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113309</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113295</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113217</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113040</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113161</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113154</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113336</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113181</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113019</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113095</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113160</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113212</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113000</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113179</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-112993</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113055</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113068</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113320</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113231</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113174</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113022</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113079</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113191</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113250</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113109</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113113</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113069</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113006</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113263</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113018</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113301</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113034</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113094</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113240</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113102</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113142</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113281</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113035</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113211</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113011</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113198</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113257</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113070</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113176</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113150</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113311</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113078</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113033</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113026</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113302</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113164</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113239</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113131</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113333</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113147</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113337</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113127</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113129</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113264</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113105</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113220</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113275</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113283</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113014</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113108</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113343</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113319</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113057</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113219</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113005</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113209</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113166</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113051</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113196</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113003</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113155</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113290</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113183</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113289</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113146</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113207</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113205</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113162</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113118</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113232</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113327</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-112999</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113249</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113272</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113112</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113321</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113059</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113137</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113208</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113238</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113194</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113189</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113060</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113115</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113045</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113307</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113009</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113071</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113278</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113190</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-112992</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-112995</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113261</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113172</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113332</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113262</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113149</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113206</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113185</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113171</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113042</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113276</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113218</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113195</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113328</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113335</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113255</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113076</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113325</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113084</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113308</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113224</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113148</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113010</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113073</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113265</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113329</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113043</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113202</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113016</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113246</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113041</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113126</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113031</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113081</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113139</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113128</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113049</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113032</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113204</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113144</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113054</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113123</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113277</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113136</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113106</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113001</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113064</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113243</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113326</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113124</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113230</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113090</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113158</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113077</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113282</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113165</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113178</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113110</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113007</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113187</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113075</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113259</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113228</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113099</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113216</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113270</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113087</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113267</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113304</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113177</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113151</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113028</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113120</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-112997</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113037</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113153</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113138</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113030</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113100</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113221</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113344</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113342</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113159</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113233</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113065</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113002</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113199</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113197</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113203</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113170</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113258</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113297</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113062</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113096</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113050</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113008</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113111</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113200</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113143</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113157</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113235</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113089</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113340</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113052</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113133</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113086</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113251</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113215</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113053</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113312</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113323</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113114</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113015</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113091</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113168</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113229</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113256</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113103</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113056</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113201</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113027</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113214</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113004</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113300</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113213</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113167</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113223</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113291</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113241</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113244</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113048</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113247</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113023</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113330</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113226</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113152</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113029</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113296</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113306</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113245</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113299</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113024</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113025</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113080</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113186</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113180</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113140</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113184</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113017</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-112998</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113021</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113145</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113292</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113156</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113116</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113047</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113173</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113260</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113269</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113036</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113268</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113038</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113313</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113061</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113248</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113288</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113085</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113107</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113066</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113121</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113287</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113132</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113169</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113254</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113063</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-112994</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113314</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113237</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113331</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113182</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113046</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113067</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113074</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113130</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113294</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-112996</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113122</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113227</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113286</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113083</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113088</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113013</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113125</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113039</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-113274</cvename>
      <url>https://chromereleases.googleblog.com/2026/10/stable-channel-update-for-desktop_02018666648.html</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-10-20</discovery>
      <entry>2026-10-22</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="8c1b47e2-cf3d-11f1-a655-3497f65b111b">
    <topic>jackson-databind -- type parameters bypass the polymorphic type validator</topic>
    <affects>
    <package>
	<name>jackson-databind</name>
	<range><lt>2.22.4</lt></range>
    </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>The Jackson project reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://github.com/FasterXML/jackson-databind/blob/2.x/release-notes/VERSION-2.x">
	  <p>Type parameters of generic type ids, and element types of array
	    type ids, were not passed to the configured
	    PolymorphicTypeValidator, so a deny-listed type could be reached
	    through a type parameter.</p>
	  <p>They are now validated like direct type ids. Approval by base
	    type only covers subtypes of that base type, allowIfSubTypeIsArray()
	    no longer accepts abstract or interface element types without
	    allow-listing, and approval of an array type covers its element
	    type only when given as exactly that class.</p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-110879</cvename>
      <url>https://github.com/FasterXML/jackson-databind/blob/2.x/release-notes/VERSION-2.x</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-10-17</discovery>
      <entry>2026-10-22</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="7b3ea5d6-cf3d-11f1-a655-3497f65b111b">
    <topic>jackson-databind -- denial of service</topic>
    <affects>
    <package>
	<name>jackson-databind</name>
	<range><lt>2.22.3</lt></range>
    </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>The Jackson project reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://github.com/FasterXML/jackson-databind/blob/2.x/release-notes/VERSION-2.x">
	  <p>CVE-2026-91776: TypeDeserializerBase caches the resolved
	    deserializer under the raw, attacker supplied type id. With name
	    based polymorphism and a fallback, every unrecognized type id adds
	    an entry and the cache grows without bound.</p>
	  <p>CVE-2026-91777: forward reference completion for JsonIdentityInfo
	    object ids scans the pending reference accumulator for every
	    resolved id, which is quadratic in the number of references.</p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-91776</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-91777</cvename>
      <url>https://github.com/FasterXML/jackson-databind/blob/2.x/release-notes/VERSION-2.x</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-09-21</discovery>
      <entry>2026-10-22</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="6a9d0f14-cf3d-11f1-a655-3497f65b111b">
    <topic>jackson-core -- denial of service</topic>
    <affects>
    <package>
	<name>jackson-core</name>
	<range><lt>2.22.3</lt></range>
    </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>The Jackson project reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://github.com/FasterXML/jackson-core/blob/2.x/release-notes/VERSION-2.x">
	  <p>CVE-2026-89407: NumberInput.looksLikeValidNumber() pre-validates
	    stringified numbers with PATTERN_FLOAT, whose adjacent quantifiers
	    allow catastrophic backtracking on crafted input.</p>
	  <p>CVE-2026-89425: UTF8DataInputJsonParser builds the offending token
	    text for an error message in a loop without an upper bound, so it
	    ignores maxErrorTokenLength. The other three parser implementations
	    are not affected.</p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-89407</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-89425</cvename>
      <url>https://github.com/FasterXML/jackson-core/blob/2.x/release-notes/VERSION-2.x</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-09-21</discovery>
      <entry>2026-10-22</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="f1e61d76-cdb6-11f1-b15e-589cfc104230">
    <topic>brotli -- out-of-bounds write permits remote code execution</topic>
    <affects>
<package>
<name>brotli</name>
<range><lt>1.2.1,1</lt></range>
</package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>-Brotli project reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://github.com/google/brotli/releases/tag/v1.2.1">
	  <p>CVE-2026-111497: out-of-bounds write permits remote code execution.</p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-111497</cvename>
      <url>https://github.com/google/brotli/releases/tag/v1.2.1</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-10-22</discovery>
      <entry>2026-10-22</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="23eecf73-cd85-11f1-97dc-40b034429ecf">
    <topic>p5-DBI -- Prevent dbi_profile crash</topic>
    <affects>
<package>
<name>p5-DBI</name>
<range><lt>1.656</lt></range>
</package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>DBI project reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://metacpan.org/dist/DBI/changes">
	  <p>Prevent dbi_profile crash (CVE-2026-108518) (Henrik Teichmann).</p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-108518</cvename>
      <url>https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/cve-2026-108518</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-10-21</discovery>
      <entry>2026-10-21</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="1701e8a6-cd43-11f1-8135-8447094a420f">
    <topic>PowerDNS -- Multiple vulnerabilities</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
	<name>powerdns-recursor</name>
	<range><lt>5.4.8</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>PowerDNS reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://doc.powerdns.com/recursor/security-advisories/powerdns-advisory-2026-12.html">
	  <ul>
	    <li>CVE-2026-73206: A crafted DNS packet can cause a denial of service decompressing the DNS names in the packet</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-73205: A malicious client can cause too many TCP connections in TIME_WAIT state</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-85555: DNSSEC validation bypass and cache poisoning in PowerDNS Recursor via out-of-band NS resolution</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-85556: Missing OPT RR owner-name validation bypasses ECS hardening</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-85557: Single web client not doing TLS handshake monopolizes web access</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-85558: Recursor retains closed TCP client addresses until process exit</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-85559: Out-of-bounds read in Recursor findScopeZero</li>
	  </ul>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-73206</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-73205</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-85555</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-85556</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-85557</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-85558</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-85559</cvename>
      <url>https://doc.powerdns.com/recursor/security-advisories/powerdns-advisory-2026-12.html</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-10-21</discovery>
      <entry>2026-10-21</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="d8e16d08-cd2f-11f1-8135-8447094a420f">
    <topic>PHP -- Multiple vulnerabilities</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
	<name>php82</name>
	<range><lt>8.2.35</lt></range>
      </package>
      <package>
	<name>php83</name>
	<range><lt>8.3.36</lt></range>
      </package>
      <package>
	<name>php84</name>
	<range><lt>8.4.27</lt></range>
      </package>
      <package>
	<name>php85</name>
	<range><lt>8.5.12</lt></range>
      </package>
      <package>
	<name>php86</name>
	<range><lt>8.6.0.r4</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>The PHP project reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://www.php.net/archive/2026.php#2026-10-21-5">
	  <p>PHP 8.5.12, 8.4.27, 8.3.36 and 8.2.35 fix two critical
	    vulnerabilities that can allow unauthenticated remote code
	    execution.</p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-109618</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-109619</cvename>
      <url>https://www.php.net/archive/2026.php#2026-10-21-5</url>
      <url>https://github.com/php/php-src/security/advisories/GHSA-w8hw-w9fx-j79w</url>
      <url>https://github.com/php/php-src/security/advisories/GHSA-6wmf-4rv5-p3rp</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-10-20</discovery>
      <entry>2026-10-21</entry>
      <modified>2026-10-21</modified>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="0be28489-cd2f-11f1-8135-8447094a420f">
    <topic>Unbound -- Multiple vulnerabilities</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
	<name>unbound</name>
	<range><lt>1.26.2</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>NLNetLabs reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://community.nlnetlabs.nl/t/unbound-1-26-2-released/3495">
	  <p>This release consolidates security fixes for issues reported over
a period of time.</p>
	  <ul>
	    <li>CVE-2026-97206, DoQ path-migration can lead to use-after-free on
multi-threaded deployments.</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-50106, Possible insecure NXDOMAIN for non-existing
records under a configured island trust anchor underneath an
insecure parent.</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-96405, Aggregate DNS name chained pointer decompression
work leads to degradation of service.</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-109125, Possible cache poisoning vulnerability via
a cache side-channel exposed by ‘unwanted-reply-threshold’.</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-35501, Bypass of a configured island trust anchor
underneath an insecure parent from an attacker-controlled NSEC
record.</li>
	  </ul>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-97206</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-50106</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-96405</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-109125</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-35501</cvename>
      <url>https://community.nlnetlabs.nl/t/unbound-1-26-2-released/3495</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-10-21</discovery>
      <entry>2026-10-21</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="070a35ef-cd22-11f1-ada3-bc241121aa0a">
    <topic>FreeBSD -- TLS certificate store update due to eMudhra compromise</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
	<name>FreeBSD</name>
	<range><ge>15.1</ge><lt>15.1_6</lt></range>
	<range><ge>14.5</ge><lt>14.5_3</lt></range>
	<range><ge>14.4</ge><lt>14.4_12</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<h1>Problem Description:</h1>
	  <p>eMudhra generated several of its TLS intermediate CA certificates
	  using a flawed procedure that used trivially small private keys.
	  The keys have been recovered by several parties and publicly
	  disclosed.  The intermediates are signed by the "emSign ECC Root
	  CA - G3" root certificate, which was included in the trusted
	  certificate bundle.</p>
	  <p>The intermediates have been revoked, but OpenSSL does not check
	  certificate revocation by default.</p>
	  <p>The corrected bundle marks "emSign ECC Root CA - G3" as untrusted.
	  It also incorporates the other root certificate additions and
	  removals in NSS 3.131.1.</p>
	<h1>Impact:</h1>
	  <p>An attacker able to intercept network traffic can use the
	  compromised keys to issue a certificate that impersonates any TLS
	  server, allowing the traffic to be read or modified without
	  detection.</p>
      </body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <freebsdsa>SA-26:73.caroot</freebsdsa>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-10-21</discovery>
      <entry>2026-10-21</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="436ad1a7-ccc8-11f1-af18-c4ff99d93a55">
    <topic>Emacs -- Local command injection via crafted file names in TRAMP</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
	<name>emacs</name>
	<name>emacs-canna</name>
	<name>emacs-nox</name>
	<name>emacs-wayland</name>
	<range><lt>31.1_3,3</lt></range>
      </package>
      <package>
	<name>emacs-devel</name>
	<name>emacs-devel-nox</name>
	<range><lt>32.0.50.20261019,3</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	  <h1>Problem Description</h1>
	  <p>TRAMP (Transparent Remote (file) Access, Multiple Protocol) is a
	  part of Emacs that provides an interface for editing remote files
	  transparently.  It builds the login command for a remote connection
	  from tramp-login-args by joining the expanded values without quoting
	  and passes the resulting string to a local shell.  The user name part
	  of a remote file name may contain shell metacharacters, and nothing
	  sanitizes them.  Because the file name dispatch regexp was anchored to
	  the start of a line rather than the start of the string, a file name
	  containing a newline followed by a remote file name syntax, for
	  example in a symbolic link target, is handed to TRAMP.</p>
	  <p>The first fix (CVE-2026-79992), included in Emacs 31.1, excluded
	  shell metacharacters from TRAMP user names, but tramp-user-regexp
	  still permitted "!", "#", "&amp;", "," and control characters.  User
	  and host names were also not re-validated after environment variable
	  expansion, and the values of tramp-default-user and tramp-default-host
	  were not validated at all.  This incomplete fix was assigned
	  CVE-2026-108976.  The commit completing the fix cites CVE-2026-79992
	  because it was written before the second identifier was published.
	  The FreeBSD Emacs package versions 31.1,3 through 31.1_2,3 and
	  emacs-devel snapshots from 32.0.50.20260902 through 32.0.50.20261001
	  are affected only by CVE-2026-108976.</p>
	  <h1>Impact</h1>
	  <p>Merely processing a crafted file name, for example with
	  file-exists-p, executes the embedded command with the privileges of
	  the user running Emacs.  No remote connection has to succeed.</p>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-79992</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-108976</cvename>
      <url>https://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2026/08/21/1</url>
      <url>https://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2026/08/26/15</url>
      <url>https://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2026/10/11/1</url>
      <url>https://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2026/10/14/4</url>
      <url>https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git/commit/?id=f3e7104d05bdb8e32ba13bf75604108ad88536dc</url>
      <url>https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git/commit/?id=044b0203267db3b7912325d076d79a79000afe75</url>
      <url>https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-79992</url>
      <url>https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-108976</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-08-21</discovery>
      <entry>2026-10-20</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="e1e332d7-cbe2-11f1-8d05-74563cf85f9d">
    <topic>anki -- page manipulation via deck description links</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
	<name>anki</name>
	<range><lt>26.9.2</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>Anki developers report:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://github.com/ankitects/anki/releases/tag/26.09.2">
	  <p>Security: Prevent external links in deck descriptions rendered
	  in the overview/congrats screen from manipulating the page in certain
	  cases when clicked.</p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <url>https://github.com/ankitects/anki/releases/tag/26.09.2</url>
      <url>https://github.com/ankitects/anki/commit/7add01b1bc89</url>
      <url>https://github.com/ankitects/anki/commit/83254832b0fb</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-09-15</discovery>
      <entry>2026-10-19</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="69adacad-cba3-11f1-8135-8447094a420f">
    <topic>Roundcube -- Multiple vulnerabilities</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
	<name>roundcube-php82</name>
	<name>roundcube-php83</name>
	<name>roundcube-php84</name>
	<name>roundcube-php85</name>
	<name>roundcube-php85</name>
	<range><lt>1.7.5,1</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>The Roundcube Mail project reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://roundcube.net/news/2026/10/19/security-updates-1.6.20-and-1.7.5">
	  <ul>
	    <li>IMAP command injection via CRLF in _uid parameter of mail/headers and mail/viewsource action</li>
	    <li>bug where an alias login wasn’t qualified by IMAP host</li>
	    <li>Add a size limit to the CSS proxy content processing</li>
	    <li>SSRF filter (is_local_url()) bypass via NAT64 64:ff9b::/96</li>
	    <li>remote content blocking bypass via SVG SMIL by attribute</li>
	    <li>remote content blocking bypass via CSS escapes in FuncIRI attributes (again)</li>
	    <li>passing potentally unsafe attachment content into ImageMagick on image resize</li>
	    <li>mail header injection via the From display-name in the Bounce (resend) action</li>
	    <li>mail header injection via References/In-Reply-To/Message-ID/From parameters</li>
	    <li>object injection primitive in rcube_session::unserialize() via “!”-prefixed session keys</li>
	    <li>ImageMagick resource limits bypass by GD fallback during thumbnail generation</li>
	    <li>CSS scoping bypass in HTML messages using at-rules</li>
	    <li>bug where deprecated action aliases bypassed disabled_actions setting</li>
	    <li>IMAP command injection via CRLF in _flag parameter of mail/mark action</li>
	    <li>CSRF validation bypass in the mark-as-junk action</li>
	    <li>XSS issue in handling of password driver error responses</li>
	    <li>mail header injection via subject of a message forwarded as attachment</li>
	    <li>mail header injection via media type in an inline image data URI</li>
	    <li>bug where Password Modoboa driver could change password for another account</li>
	    <li>unsafe use of a login name in SquirrelMail import file path</li>
	  </ul>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <url>https://roundcube.net/news/2026/10/19/security-updates-1.6.20-and-1.7.5</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-10-19</discovery>
      <entry>2026-10-19</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="3749073b-c8f9-11f1-9ceb-4c526214c986">
    <topic>Erlang/OTP -- multiple vulnerabilities in ssl, inets, public_key and snmp</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
	<name>erlang</name>
	<range><lt>28.5.0.8,4</lt></range>
      </package>
      <package>
	<name>erlang-runtime27</name>
	<range><lt>27.3.4.19</lt></range>
      </package>
      <package>
	<name>erlang-runtime28</name>
	<range><lt>28.5.0.8</lt></range>
      </package>
      <package>
	<name>erlang-runtime29</name>
	<range><lt>29.1.2</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>The Erlang/OTP project reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://github.com/erlang/otp/security/advisories">
	  <p>OTP 29.1.2, 28.5.0.8 and 27.3.4.19 fix the following
	  issues, three of which complete earlier incomplete
	  fixes:</p>
	  <ul>
	    <li>CVE-2026-105236: (D)TLS-1.2 session resumption could
	    cross SNI virtual-host boundaries.  An SNI-aware server
	    resumed a cached session even when the resumption
	    request's server_name differed from the one that
	    established it, so a client could bypass the
	    client-authentication boundary of a second virtual
	    service and skip the certificate exchange.</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-94200: a malicious or man-in-the-middle
	    TLS-1.3 server could poison a client's ticket store with
	    a NewSessionTicket carrying a zero-length early_data
	    extension.  A client using automatic session-ticket
	    management stored the ticket and crashed on a later
	    resumption, taking down the node-global client ticket
	    store.</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-42789: the earlier fix for certificate chain
	    forgery via non-CA intermediates in public_key left the
	    X.509 version 1 and version 2 path uncovered.  Such
	    certificates carry no basicConstraints and are now
	    rejected in issuer position.</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-48856: the earlier fix for credential leaks
	    on cross-origin httpc redirects did not clear the
	    userinfo component of the request URI, so credentials
	    given as http://user:password@host/path were still sent
	    to the redirect target.</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-70405: the earlier byte-length bounds on
	    snmp varbind values did not cover the v3 header fields,
	    the USM security parameters or the PDU integer fields,
	    which could still be decoded into arbitrarily large
	    integers.</li>
	  </ul>
	</blockquote>
      </body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-42789</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-48856</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-70405</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-94200</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-105236</cvename>
      <url>https://github.com/erlang/otp/security/advisories/GHSA-c99q-jmpx-v8qq</url>
      <url>https://github.com/erlang/otp/security/advisories/GHSA-m75x-4vwg-ggjh</url>
      <url>https://github.com/erlang/otp/security/advisories/GHSA-q7cq-pfgf-5hr7</url>
      <url>https://github.com/erlang/otp/security/advisories/GHSA-m5mh-q53w-67jq</url>
      <url>https://github.com/erlang/otp/security/advisories/GHSA-2g23-cgjh-34gq</url>
      <url>https://github.com/erlang/otp/releases/tag/OTP-29.1.2</url>
      <url>https://github.com/erlang/otp/releases/tag/OTP-28.5.0.8</url>
      <url>https://github.com/erlang/otp/releases/tag/OTP-27.3.4.19</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-10-14</discovery>
      <entry>2026-10-16</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="37492489-c8f9-11f1-9ceb-4c526214c986">
    <topic>Erlang/OTP -- erl_tar denial of service via crafted GNU sparse member</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
	<name>erlang-runtime29</name>
	<range><lt>29.1.2</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>https://github.com/erlang/otp/security/advisories/GHSA-phm5-m6cj-5382 reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://github.com/erlang/otp/security/advisories/GHSA-phm5-m6cj-5382">
	  <p>A loop with unreachable exit condition ('infinite loop')
	  vulnerability in the erl_tar module allowed an attacker who
	  supplied a tar archive to cause a denial of service via a
	  crafted GNU sparse member with a trailing hole.</p>
	</blockquote>
      </body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-96596</cvename>
      <url>https://github.com/erlang/otp/security/advisories/GHSA-phm5-m6cj-5382</url>
      <url>https://github.com/erlang/otp/releases/tag/OTP-29.1.2</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-10-14</discovery>
      <entry>2026-10-16</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="10baec0d-ca7a-11f1-8dcf-5404a68ad561">
    <topic>traefik -- Multiple vulnerabilities</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
      <name>traefik</name>
      <range><lt>3.7.15</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
      <p>The traefik project releases a new version addressing multiple vulnerabilities:</p>
      <blockquote cite="https://github.com/traefik/traefik/releases/tag/v3.7.15">
      <ul>
      <li>GHSA-p8wx-ph99-xgcr (mTLS (auth-tls-secret) silently disabled for a host)</li>
      <li>GHSA-ww7c-q3mv-xx22 (Data race on the shared bufio.Reader)</li>
      <li>GHSA-28hp-c82p-8vqj (TLS-option cache hit skips the cross-namespace authorization check)</li>
      </ul>
      </blockquote>
      </body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <url>https://github.com/traefik/traefik/releases/tag/v3.7.15</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-10-15</discovery>
      <entry>2026-10-17</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="39d5f71d-ca2a-11f1-ada1-ac5afc632ba3">
    <topic>libXtst -- multiple vulnerabilities</topic>
    <affects>
<package>
<name>libXtst</name>
<range><lt>1.2.6</lt></range>
</package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>X.Org reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-announce/2026-October/003752.html">
	  <p>Multiple issues have been found in the X client library
	  implementations published by X.Org for which we are
	  releasing security fixes for.</p>
	  <ul>
	    <li>CVE-2026-94286: Out-of-bounds read in libXtst's RECORD reply parser</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-109088: libXtst RECORD EnableContext Reply Endless Loop</li>
	  </ul>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-94286</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-109088</cvename>
      <url>https://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-announce/2026-October/003752.html</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-10-17</discovery>
      <entry>2026-10-17</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="8c6ec104-ca27-11f1-ada1-ac5afc632ba3">
    <topic>libXrender -- vulnerability</topic>
    <affects>
<package>
<name>libXrender</name>
<range><lt>0.9.13</lt></range>
</package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>X.Org reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-announce/2026-October/003752.html">
	  <p>Multiple issues have been found in the X client library
	  implementations published by X.Org for which we are
	  releasing security fixes for.</p>
	  <ul>
	    <li>CVE-2026-88807: Out-of-bounds read in libXrender's XRenderQueryFormat reply parser</li>
	  </ul>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-88807</cvename>
      <url>https://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-announce/2026-October/003752.html</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-10-17</discovery>
      <entry>2026-10-17</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="d4bc120a-ca26-11f1-ada1-ac5afc632ba3">
    <topic>libXpm -- vulnerability</topic>
    <affects>
<package>
<name>libXpm</name>
<range><lt>3.5.20</lt></range>
</package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>X.Org reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-announce/2026-October/003752.html">
	  <p>Multiple issues have been found in the X client library
	  implementations published by X.Org for which we are
	  releasing security fixes for.</p>
	  <ul>
	    <li>CVE-2026-94287: Denial of service via unsigned underflow in libXpm's write path</li>
	  </ul>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-94287</cvename>
      <url>https://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-announce/2026-October/003752.html</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-10-17</discovery>
      <entry>2026-10-17</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="9022f1ac-ca25-11f1-ada1-ac5afc632ba3">
    <topic>libXi -- multiple vulnerabilities</topic>
    <affects>
<package>
<name>libXi</name>
<range><lt>1.8.4</lt></range>
</package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>X.Org reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-announce/2026-October/003752.html">
	  <p>Multiple issues have been found in the X client library
	  implementations published by X.Org for which we are
	  releasing security fixes for.</p>
	  <ul>
	    <li>CVE-2026-93541: Out-of-bounds read in libXi's XQueryDeviceState()</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-93542: Out-of-bounds read in libXi's XI2 class parsing via size_classes() and copy_classes()</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-93543: Out-of-bounds read in libXi's XI2 class parser</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-93544: Out-of-bounds read in libXi's XI2 XIQueryDevice reply parsing</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-93545: Out-of-bounds read in libXi's XListInputDevices()</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-94281: Out-of-bounds read in libXi's XListInputDevices() class parsing</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-94282: Out-of-bounds read in libXi's XI2 enter/leave/focus cookie conversion.</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-109089: libXi XGetDeviceControl Control Type Mismatch Heap Buffer Overflow</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-109090: libXi XGetDeviceControl DEVICE_ENABLE Heap Buffer Overflow</li>
	  </ul>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-93541</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-93542</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-93543</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-93544</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-93545</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-94281</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-94282</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-109089</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-109090</cvename>
      <url>https://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-announce/2026-October/003752.html</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-10-17</discovery>
      <entry>2026-10-17</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="fbf59c13-ca23-11f1-ada1-ac5afc632ba3">
    <topic>libX11 -- multiple vulnerabilities</topic>
    <affects>
<package>
<name>libX11</name>
<range><lt>1.8.14</lt></range>
</package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>X.Org reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-announce/2026-October/003752.html">
	  <p>Multiple issues have been found in the X client library
	  implementations published by X.Org for which we are
	  releasing security fixes for.</p>
	  <ul>
	    <li>CVE-2026-88806: Out-of-bounds write vulnerability in libX11's XKB (X Keyboard Extension) action parser</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-94283: Out-of-bounds read vulnerability in libX11's XIM (X Input Method) attribute parser</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-94284: Out-of-bounds read vulnerability in libX11's XIM trigger-key registration parser</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-94285: Out-of-bounds read in libX11's byte-oriented codeset parser</li>
	  </ul>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-88806</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-94283</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-94284</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-94285</cvename>
      <url>https://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-announce/2026-October/003752.html</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-10-17</discovery>
      <entry>2026-10-17</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="83f5b20f-4429-4ee1-a764-66a231ed9dab">
    <topic>mod_wsgi -- race condition at process start can leak request context between requests</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
	<name>ap24-py312-mod_wsgi</name>
	<range><lt>6.1.1</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>Graham Dumpleton reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://github.com/GrahamDumpleton/mod_wsgi/security/advisories/GHSA-q67r-wxfm-97hj">
	  <p>A race condition at process startup could let two threads be
	  handed the same per-thread record, because records were allocated
	  from an Apache memory pool shared by every thread without a lock.
	  Threads sharing a record also shared the mod_wsgi.thread_id value
	  and, for named application groups, the same Python thread state,
	  so one request's context (such as session data) could leak into
	  another concurrent request. On Python 3.14 and later the shared
	  thread state could instead crash the worker process.</p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <url>https://github.com/GrahamDumpleton/mod_wsgi/security/advisories/GHSA-q67r-wxfm-97hj</url>
      <url>https://modwsgi.readthedocs.io/en/latest/release-notes/version-6.1.1.html</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-10-13</discovery>
      <entry>2026-10-16</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="43dc274d-f74b-4420-8ef8-d2e108213002">
    <topic>miniupnpd -- Integer underflow in SOAPAction header parsing</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
	<name>miniupnpd</name>
	<range><lt>2.3.10,1</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>An integer underflow in the SOAPAction header parsing in
	  ParseHttpHeaders() lets a remote attacker trigger an
	  out-of-bounds read by sending a malformed SOAPAction header
	  containing a single quote.  This can crash miniupnpd or
	  disclose memory beyond the HTTP request buffer.</p>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-5720</cvename>
      <url>https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/miniupnpd-integer-underflow-soapaction-header-parsing</url>
      <url>https://github.com/miniupnp/miniupnp/commit/f56bd09b2f2650126b832c5f30a65a09e28167fa</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-04-17</discovery>
      <entry>2026-10-16</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="dec22770-c953-11f1-bebb-3c7c3fba4204">
    <topic>Text::CSV_XS -- multiple vulnerabilities</topic>
    <affects>
	<package>
	  <name>p5-Text-CSV_XS</name>
	  <range><lt>1.65</lt></range>
	</package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>H.Merijn Brand - Tux &lt;linux@tux.freedom.nl&gt; reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://metacpan.org/dist/Text-CSV_XS/changes">
	  <p>Text::CSV_XS versions before 1.65 have these vulnerabilities listed below.</p>
	  <ul>
	    <li>CVE-2026-110759: parse (): report trailing lone CR, do not store EOF as 0xFF</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-110758: Under allow_whitespace, do not strip beyond field start</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-110757: combine (): decide quoting from the bytes, not the NV flags</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-110756: Flush saved bytes in Combine ()</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-110755: Re-use AHEAD with \r instead of copying</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-110754: getline (): free the result array when the parse fails</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-110753: Do not free the bound column scalar in skip_empty_rows</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-110752: fragment (): do not size memory by the selector integers</li>
	  </ul>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-110759</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-110758</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-110757</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-110756</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-110755</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-110754</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-110753</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-110752</cvename>
      <url>https://metacpan.org/dist/Text-CSV_XS/changes</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-10-15</discovery>
      <entry>2026-10-16</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="bac88b3f-c8a1-11f1-866a-3c7c3fba4204">
    <topic>NSD -- multiple vulnerabilities</topic>
    <affects>
	<package>
	  <name>nsd</name>
	  <range><ge>4.10.0</ge><lt>4.15.3</lt></range>
	</package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>NLnet Labs reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://community.nlnetlabs.nl/t/nsd-4-15-3-security-release/3490">
	  <p>This security release has fixes for vulnerabilities which were all for cases with specially crafted and formatted data in zone files. Zone files which are written out by NSD itself, such as for zones for which NSD is secondary, would not be formatted like this. The zone file had to be fed to NSD directly, but could in multi-tenant configurations, come from an operator controlled provisioning system accessible to third parties. Zone files that are regularly formatted (generated from DNS software) or come from trusted sources would not trigger these vulnerabilities.</p>
	  <ul>
	  <li>CVE-2026-101337: Reserve correct number of bytes for base64 sequence tokens, regardless of stream decoder phase.</li>
	  <li>CVE-2026-101338: No SVCB and/or HTTPS parameters are parsed when the RDATA is already filled to the brim.</li>
	  <li>CVE-2026-101339: Fix for dname possibility to overwrite the stack when near the RDATA limit.</li>
	  <li>CVE-2026-101341: Also check that RDATA stays within bounds while parsing string tokens under 32 bytes.</li>
	  </ul>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-101337</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-101338</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-101339</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-101341</cvename>
      <url>https://www.nlnetlabs.nl/downloads/nsd/CVE-2026-101337.txt</url>
      <url>https://www.nlnetlabs.nl/downloads/nsd/CVE-2026-101338.txt</url>
      <url>https://www.nlnetlabs.nl/downloads/nsd/CVE-2026-101339.txt</url>
      <url>https://www.nlnetlabs.nl/downloads/nsd/CVE-2026-101341.txt</url>
      <url>https://community.nlnetlabs.nl/t/nsd-4-15-3-security-release/3490</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-10-14</discovery>
      <entry>2026-10-15</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="1be69a2e-c883-11f1-b5c5-3c7c3fba4204">
    <topic>Newsboat -- vulnerabilities</topic>
    <affects>
	<package>
	  <name>newsboat</name>
	  <range><ge>2.10</ge><lt>2.45</lt></range>
	</package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>Newsboat Team reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://github.com/newsboat/newsboat/blob/r2.45/CHANGELOG.md#security">
	<ul>
	  <li>(CVE ID Pending) Remote code execution via manual OPML import (--import-from-opml)</li>
	  <li><a href="https://github.com/newsboat/newsboat/security/advisories/GHSA-4m8m-vj3m-hfxx">GHSA-4m8m-vj3m-hfxx</a>: Remote code execution via OPML import (both manual --import-from-opml and opml-url config setting)</li>
	  <li><a href="https://github.com/newsboat/newsboat/security/advisories/GHSA-pvg7-gjxf-23c9">GHSA-pvg7-gjxf-23c9</a>: Podboat could write at arbitrary paths</li>
	</ul>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <url>https://github.com/newsboat/newsboat/security/advisories/GHSA-4m8m-vj3m-hfxx</url>
      <url>https://github.com/newsboat/newsboat/security/advisories/GHSA-pvg7-gjxf-23c9</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-10-04</discovery>
      <entry>2026-10-15</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="f0604004-c87b-11f1-9006-3497f65b111b">
    <topic>nginx-module-cache-purge -- symlink traversal when walking cache trees</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
       <name>nginx-module-cache-purge</name>
       <range><lt>3.0.4</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
       <p>The ngx_cache_purge developers report:</p>
       <blockquote cite="https://github.com/nginx-modules/ngx_cache_purge/releases/tag/3.0.4">
       <p>
       Fixed a symlink traversal vulnerability during cache tree traversal.
       An attacker with the ability to create symbolic links inside the
       cache directory could potentially cause cache purge operations to
       delete arbitrary files accessible to the NGINX worker process
       (CVE-2026-108981).
       </p>
      </blockquote>
     </body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-108981</cvename>
      <url>https://github.com/nginx-modules/ngx_cache_purge/releases/tag/3.0.4</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-10-11</discovery>
      <entry>2026-10-15</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="3f9e602e-c849-11f1-ada3-bc241121aa0a">
    <topic>FreeBSD -- Multiple vulnerabilities in bhyve device models</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
	<name>FreeBSD</name>
	<range><ge>15.1</ge><lt>15.1_5</lt></range>
	<range><ge>14.5</ge><lt>14.5_2</lt></range>
	<range><ge>14.4</ge><lt>14.4_11</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<h1>Problem Description:</h1>
	  <p>Several vulnerabilities were found in the bhyve hypervisor's
	  device models.</p>
	  <p>The xHCI (USB 3) device model did not validate or save the event
	  ring size provided by the guest.  The size was re-read from guest
	  memory on each use, and Transfer Request Block (TRB) fields were
	  loaded without protection against concurrent modification by the
	  guest.  This race condition could be triggered by a guest running
	  malicious, privileged code.  (CVE-2026-101309)</p>
	  <p>The HDA audio device model did not check for zero-length Buffer
	  Descriptor List (BDL) entries when starting a stream.  A zero-length
	  entry caused an out-of-bounds read or write during DMA transfer
	  processing.  BDL fields were also subject to modification by the
	  guest after validation.  (CVE-2026-101310)</p>
	  <p>The framebuffer device model's maximum resolution constants were
	  duplicated between the framebuffer and RFB modules and had gotten
	  out of sync.  Additionally, writes to the framebuffer BAR could set
	  arbitrary width and height values without validation, and the
	  framebuffer BAR I/O and RFB rendering threads were not synchronized.
	  (CVE-2026-101311)</p>
	<h1>Impact:</h1>
	  <p>A malicious guest can crash the bhyve process or potentially
	  execute arbitrary code in the host userspace context running the
	  virtual machine, subject to bhyve's Capsicum sandbox.</p>
      </body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-101309</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-101310</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-101311</cvename>
      <freebsdsa>SA-26:72.bhyve</freebsdsa>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-10-14</discovery>
      <entry>2026-10-15</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="1fef3562-c848-11f1-ada3-bc241121aa0a">
    <topic>FreeBSD -- TOCTOU race between sound(4) buffer resizing and mmap</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
	<name>FreeBSD-kernel</name>
	<range><ge>15.1</ge><lt>15.1_5</lt></range>
	<range><ge>14.5</ge><lt>14.5_2</lt></range>
	<range><ge>14.4</ge><lt>14.4_11</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<h1>Problem Description:</h1>
	  <p>When an audio channel's buffer needs to be resized, the sound(4)
	  driver checks that the buffer is not memory-mapped and then drops
	  the channel lock to allocate a new buffer.  An mmap(2) call on
	  another thread can complete during this window, after which the
	  resize path frees the now-mapped buffer without rechecking.</p>
	<h1>Impact:</h1>
	  <p>An unprivileged local user with access to a sound device can
	  exploit this race to trigger a use-after-free in the kernel,
	  potentially escalating privileges.</p>
      </body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-101308</cvename>
      <freebsdsa>SA-26:71.sound</freebsdsa>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-10-14</discovery>
      <entry>2026-10-15</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="e40e981e-c847-11f1-ada3-bc241121aa0a">
    <topic>FreeBSD -- Remotely triggerable buffer overflow in tcp_rack</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
	<name>FreeBSD-kernel</name>
	<range><ge>15.1</ge><lt>15.1_5</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<h1>Problem Description:</h1>
	  <p>When the PCM sample array needs to grow, the RACK stack doubles
	  a 16-bit allocation counter.  Repeated doublings caused the counter
	  to wrap to zero, resulting in a near-zero-length allocation followed
	  by a copy of the existing samples into the undersized buffer.  A
	  remote peer can trigger the expansion by sending a sufficient number
	  of ACKs on an established connection.</p>
	<h1>Impact:</h1>
	  <p>A remote attacker who can establish a TCP connection to a system
	  using the RACK stack can trigger an out-of-bounds write of approximately
	  512 KB in the kernel heap possibly resulting in a kernel panic.</p>
      </body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-101307</cvename>
      <freebsdsa>SA-26:70.tcp</freebsdsa>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-10-14</discovery>
      <entry>2026-10-15</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="95970257-c867-11f1-9006-3497f65b111b">
    <topic>nginx -- multiple vulnerabilities</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
       <name>nginx</name>
       <name>nginx-full</name>
       <name>nginx-lite</name>
       <range><lt>1.30.6,3</lt></range>
      </package>
      <package>
       <name>nginx-devel</name>
       <range><lt>1.31.7</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
       <p>The nginx developers report:</p>
       <blockquote cite="https://nginx.org/en/security_advisories.html">
       <p>
       A buffer overflow might occur in a worker process when using the
       "alias" directive if the request URI was changed by the "rewrite"
       directive and was then mapped to a file path (CVE-2026-15176).
       </p>
       <p>
       A buffer overflow might occur in a worker process while evaluating
       string expressions with variables, which affected the document root
       calculation and request logging in the http and stream modules
       (CVE-2026-93479).
       </p>
       <p>
       When using HTTP/3 a part of an unknown frame might be treated as the
       request body, which might result in bypassing the
       "client_max_body_size" limit or injecting data in the proxied
       request (CVE-2026-95101).
       </p>
       <p>
       When using TLS session ticket key rotation, one of the keys was left
       uninitialized, which might allow to forge a session (CVE-2026-97629).
       </p>
       <p>
       When using asynchronous file I/O (AIO), use-after-free might occur in
       certain configurations if the SSI page has "include virtual" commands
       (CVE-2026-97205).
       </p>
      </blockquote>
     </body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-15176</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-93479</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-95101</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-97629</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-97205</cvename>
      <url>https://nginx.org/en/security_advisories.html</url>
      <url>https://nginx.org/en/CHANGES-1.30</url>
      <url>https://nginx.org/en/CHANGES</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-10-14</discovery>
      <entry>2026-10-15</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="fdb34ad1-c7ac-11f1-97dc-40b034429ecf">
    <topic>p5-Plack -- Multiple vulnerabilities</topic>
    <affects>
	<package>
	<name>p5-Plack</name>
	<range><lt>1.0055</lt></range>
	</package>
    </affects>
    <description>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>Plack project reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://metacpan.org/dist/Plack/changes">
	  <p>[SECURITY]</p>
	  <ul>
	    <li>Fix memory leak of every request env in Plack::Middleware::Recursive (CVE-2026-110333)</li>
	    <li>Plack::Request::Upload->basename never returns '', '.' or '..' (CVE-2026-110332)</li>
	    <li>Plack::App::URLMap matches SERVER_PORT literally when stripping it from Host (CVE-2026-110335)</li>
	  </ul>
	  <p>[BUG FIXES]</p>
	  <ul>
	    <li>Plack::Middleware::ErrorDocument restores the env after a subrequest, so outer
	    middleware such as AccessLog sees the original request (CVE-2026-110334)</li>
	  </ul>
	  <p>[BUG FIXES]</p>
	  <ul>
	    <li>Document that Plack::Handler::FCGI and Apache2 keep dot segments in PATH_INFO and
	    warn against relying on front-server path-based access control (CVE-2026-110336)</li>
	  </ul>
	</blockquote>
      </body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-110333</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-110332</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-110335</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-110334</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-110336</cvename>
      <url>https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/cve-2026-110333</url>
      <url>https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/cve-2026-110332</url>
      <url>https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/cve-2026-110335</url>
      <url>https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/cve-2026-110334</url>
      <url>https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/cve-2026-110336</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-10-13</discovery>
      <entry>2026-10-14</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="14dab969-c797-11f1-a6ea-8447094a420f">
    <topic>Curl -- Multiple vulnerabilities</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
	<name>curl</name>
	<range><lt>8.23.0</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>The Curl project reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="">
	  <ul>
	    <li>local interface connection reuse mixup (CVE-2026-107929)</li>
	    <li>info leak uploading over WebSockets with GnuTLS (CVE-2026-107928)</li>
	    <li>password leak in CURLINFO_EFFECTIVE_URL (CVE-2026-94266)</li>
	    <li>Authorization: Negotiate sent to foreign origin (CVE-2026-94265)</li>
	    <li>server-set cookie aborts cookie jar load (CVE-2026-92386)</li>
	    <li>never-ending loop via server response omission (CVE-2026-92387)</li>
	    <li>FTP wildcard write callback mixup (CVE-2026-92388)</li>
	    <li>TFTP direction confusion (CVE-2026-92389)</li>
	    <li>-J no-clobber guarantee bypassed with 103 early hints (CVE-2026-92390)</li>
	    <li>curl_mime_free stack overflow by recursion (CVE-2026-92391)</li>
	    <li>HTTP/2 upload Use-After-Free (CVE-2026-92392)</li>
	    <li>redirect to SFTP or SCP bypasses host verification (CVE-2026-86410)</li>
	    <li>server-set cookie erases cookie jar (CVE-2026-86412)</li>
	    <li>Negotiate credentials sent to redirected origin (CVE-2026-86413)</li>
	    <li>leaking host credentials to HTTP proxy (CVE-2026-86414)</li>
	    <li>auto client cert connection reuse mixup (CVE-2026-86415)</li>
	    <li>cross-origin reuse of a Negotiate connection (CVE-2026-87861)</li>
	    <li>HSTS cache import drops longer-lived child (CVE-2026-87862)</li>
	    <li>HSTS response erases persisted entries (CVE-2026-87863)</li>
	    <li>knownhost callback mismatches key as missing (CVE-2026-87865)</li>
	    <li>wolfSSL public-key pinning bypass (CVE-2026-87866)</li>
	  </ul>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-107929</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-107928</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-94266</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-94265</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-92386</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-92387</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-92388</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-92389</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-92390</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-92391</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-92392</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-86410</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-86412</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-86413</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-86414</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-86415</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-87861</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-87862</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-87863</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-87865</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-87866</cvename>
      <url>https://curl.se/docs/security.html</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-10-14</discovery>
      <entry>2026-10-14</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="371fc9b2-c543-11f1-b115-74563cf85f9d">
    <topic>libwasmtime -- Multiple vulnerabilities</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
	<name>libwasmtime</name>
	<name>wasmtime</name>
	<range><lt>36.0.17</lt></range>
	<range><ge>37.0.0</ge><lt>48.0.4</lt></range>
	<range><ge>49.0.0</ge><lt>49.0.2</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>Wasmtime development team reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://github.com/bytecodealliance/wasmtime/releases/tag/v49.0.2">
	  <ul>
	    <li>Wasmtime component async-lifted callback result count is
	    unvalidated, causing a native stack buffer overflow.</li>
	    <li>Mis-typed WebAssembly tag imports can lead to GC heap
	    corruption.</li>
	    <li>Rooting for GC values live across try_call may be missing,
	    causing GC heap corruption.</li>
	    <li>Excessive allocated memory on the host when guests don't
	    have stdio.</li>
	    <li>Guest can panic host through filesystem timestamp before the
	    epoch on wasip3.</li>
	    <li>Wasmtime wasi:http implementation panics with a zero timeout
	    supplied.</li>
	    <li>WASI preview 0 implementation of poll_oneoff circumvents fuel
	    consumption.</li>
	    <li>fd_readdir copies uninitialized struct padding into guest
	    memory.</li>
	  </ul>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <url>https://github.com/bytecodealliance/wasmtime/security/advisories/GHSA-32h6-97mm-8q3c</url>
      <url>https://github.com/bytecodealliance/wasmtime/security/advisories/GHSA-cfhf-m2cr-62wj</url>
      <url>https://github.com/bytecodealliance/wasmtime/security/advisories/GHSA-hw8m-q44c-ggrf</url>
      <url>https://github.com/bytecodealliance/wasmtime/security/advisories/GHSA-gqmc-89g8-p25r</url>
      <url>https://github.com/bytecodealliance/wasmtime/security/advisories/GHSA-mr2v-56j5-cmfc</url>
      <url>https://github.com/bytecodealliance/wasmtime/security/advisories/GHSA-w4qr-p94g-mjhv</url>
      <url>https://github.com/bytecodealliance/wasmtime/security/advisories/GHSA-j366-h8gg-77pm</url>
      <url>https://github.com/bytecodealliance/wasmtime/security/advisories/GHSA-96f6-r43r-8c24</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-10-02</discovery>
      <entry>2026-10-11</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="07e99f22-c176-4c8f-9678-a57ba8114959">
    <topic>Timing leaks of the nonce in ECDSA, EdDSA and DSA signatures</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
	<name>py312-pycryptodome</name>
	<name>py312-pycryptodomex</name>
	<name>py313-pycryptodome</name>
	<name>py313-pycryptodomex</name>
	<name>py313t-pycryptodome</name>
	<name>py313t-pycryptodomex</name>
	<name>py314-pycryptodome</name>
	<name>py314-pycryptodomex</name>
	<name>py314t-pycryptodome</name>
	<name>py314t-pycryptodomex</name>
	<name>py311-pycryptodome</name>
	<name>py311-pycryptodomex</name>
	<name>py315-pycryptodome</name>
	<name>py315-pycryptodomex</name>
	<name>py27-pycryptodome</name>
	<name>py27-pycryptodomex</name>
	<range><lt>3.24.1</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>Helder Eijs reports</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://github.com/Legrandin/pycryptodome/commit/59351474682db6648825f17b11112d6821d66cb9">
	  <p>Fix timing leaks of the nonce in ECDSA, EdDSA and DSA signatures
	     The signing time depended on the secret nonce, enough to recover the
	     private key with a lattice attack.

	     - EC: scalars are encoded and processed on the full length of the
	       order, and ec_mix_add() is constant time for the point at infinity
	       (a zero digit).
	     - DSA: g^k uses k + q or k + 2q (fixed length) and mpz_powm_sec, or the
	       library's Montgomery exponentiation without GMP. About 40% slower.</p>
	</blockquote>
      </body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <url>https://github.com/Legrandin/pycryptodome/commit/59351474682db6648825f17b11112d6821d66cb9</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-10-11</discovery>
      <entry>2026-10-12</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="5518664d-c652-11f1-b273-2cf05da270f3">
    <topic>Gitlab -- vulnerabilities</topic>
    <affects>
<package>
	<name>gitlab-ce</name>
	<name>gitlab-ee</name>
	<range><ge>19.4.0</ge><lt>19.4.2</lt></range>
	<range><ge>19.3.0</ge><lt>19.3.4</lt></range>
	<range><ge>10.3.0</ge><lt>19.2.8</lt></range>
</package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>Gitlab reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://docs.gitlab.com/releases/patches/patch-release-gitlab-19-4-2-released/?nav=19.4.2">
	  <p>Integer Overflow issue in CI/CD Regular Expression Compiler impacts GitLab CE/EE</p>
	  <p>Cross-site Scripting issue in syntax highlighting impacts GitLab CE/EE</p>
	  <p>Improper Authorization issue in downstream pipeline creation service impacts GitLab CE/EE</p>
	  <p>Permissive Regular Expression issue in repository file access impacts GitLab CE/EE</p>
	  <p>Incorrect Authorization issue in scheduled pipeline execution policy impacts GitLab EE</p>
	  <p>Improper Neutralization of Input Used for LLM Prompting issue in GitLab Duo Agent Platform impacts GitLab EE</p>
	  <p>Sensitive Information Exposure issue in GitLab Pages impacts GitLab CE/EE</p>
	  <p>Open Redirect issue in Kubernetes proxy impacts GitLab CE/EE</p>
	  <p>Incorrect Authorization issue in GraphQL notes widget impacts GitLab CE/EE</p>
	  <p>Incorrect Authorization issue in GraphQL work item hierarchy impacts GitLab CE/EE</p>
	  <p>Incorrect Authorization issue in GraphQL scope impacts GitLab CE/EE</p>
	  <p>Page cache poisoning via improper cache key construction in merge requests impacts GitLab CE/EE</p>
	  <p>Incorrect Authorization issue in work items GraphQL API impacts GitLab CE/EE</p>
	  <p>Missing Authorization issue in merge request accessibility report comparison endpoint impacts GitLab CE/EE</p>
	  <p>Incorrect Privilege Assignment issue in custom roles impacts GitLab EE</p>
	  <p>Insufficient Granularity of Access Control issue in project label management impacts GitLab CE/EE</p>
	  <p>Governance Control Bypass issue in Duo Agent Platform impacts GitLab EE</p>
	  <p>Incorrect Authorization issue in package registry impacts GitLab CE/EE</p>
	  <p>Incorrect Authorization issue in merge request approval eligibility check impacts GitLab EE</p>
	  <p>Incorrect Authorization issue in fine-grained personal access tokens impacts GitLab CE/EE</p>
	  <p>Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) issue in repository import impacts GitLab CE/EE</p>
	  <p>Incorrect Authorization issue in project import impacts GitLab CE/EE</p>
	  <p>Incorrect Authorization issue in Package Registry impacts GitLab CE/EE</p>
	  <p>Improper Access Control issue in project CI/CD settings impacts GitLab EE</p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-97229</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-92883</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-16301</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-14814</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-81839</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-96893</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-101168</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-7767</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-16275</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-84284</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-85529</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-100755</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-14552</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-6567</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-104661</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-14210</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-105458</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-5954</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-92528</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-78335</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-100104</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-82632</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-103549</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-9268</cvename>
      <url>https://docs.gitlab.com/releases/patches/patch-release-gitlab-19-4-2-released/?nav=19.4.2</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-10-12</discovery>
      <entry>2026-10-12</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="bfa621d9-e508-4e3e-9a15-c2b54929ea77">
    <topic>gstreamer1 -- multiple vulnerabilities</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
	<name>gstreamer1</name>
	<name>gstreamer1-editing-services</name>
	<name>gstreamer1-plugins</name>
	<name>gstreamer1-plugins-bad</name>
	<name>gstreamer1-plugins-good</name>
	<name>gstreamer1-plugins-ugly</name>
	<name>gstreamer1-rtsp-server</name>
	<range><lt>1.28.8</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>The GStreamer project reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://gstreamer.freedesktop.org/security/">
	  <p>Multiple security issues were identified and fixed in the GStreamer framework.</p>
	  <ul>
	    <li>GStreamer-SA-2026-0078: Type confusion crash in GValue list comparison when parsing caps</li>
	    <li>GStreamer-SA-2026-0083: Out-of-bounds read and write in GStreamer video meta deserialization</li>
	    <li>GStreamer-SA-2026-0084: Out-of-bounds read in the RTSP KeyMgmt header parser</li>
	    <li>GStreamer-SA-2026-0085: Stack-based out-of-bounds write in closed caption converter and combiner</li>
	    <li>GStreamer-SA-2026-0086: Out-of-bounds read in H.265 RTP depayloader when processing short packets</li>
	    <li>GStreamer-SA-2026-0087: Excessive memory allocation in the ASF demuxer</li>
	    <li>GStreamer-SA-2026-0088: Heap out-of-bounds write in RTP L8/L16/L24 audio depayloaders</li>
	    <li>GStreamer-SA-2026-0089: Integer overflow and out-of-bounds read in Matroska demuxer Xiph codec data parser</li>
	    <li>GStreamer-SA-2026-0090: Arbitrary element instantiation in GStreamer Editing Services project file loader</li>
	    <li>GStreamer-SA-2026-0091: Out-of-bounds read in RTCP SDES privately defined entry handling</li>
	    <li>GStreamer-SA-2026-0092: Out-of-bounds read in SVG image decoder</li>
	  </ul>
	</blockquote>
      </body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-86476</cvename>
      <url>https://gstreamer.freedesktop.org/security/sa-2026-0078.html</url>
      <url>https://gstreamer.freedesktop.org/security/sa-2026-0083.html</url>
      <url>https://gstreamer.freedesktop.org/security/sa-2026-0084.html</url>
      <url>https://gstreamer.freedesktop.org/security/sa-2026-0085.html</url>
      <url>https://gstreamer.freedesktop.org/security/sa-2026-0086.html</url>
      <url>https://gstreamer.freedesktop.org/security/sa-2026-0087.html</url>
      <url>https://gstreamer.freedesktop.org/security/sa-2026-0088.html</url>
      <url>https://gstreamer.freedesktop.org/security/sa-2026-0089.html</url>
      <url>https://gstreamer.freedesktop.org/security/sa-2026-0090.html</url>
      <url>https://gstreamer.freedesktop.org/security/sa-2026-0091.html</url>
      <url>https://gstreamer.freedesktop.org/security/sa-2026-0092.html</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-10-08</discovery>
      <entry>2026-10-12</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="bb4528f4-c5d4-11f1-8c8c-ac5afc632ba3">
    <topic>podman -- vulnerabilities</topic>
    <affects>
	<package>
	<name>podman</name>
	<range><lt>5.8.8</lt></range>
	</package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>The Podman developers report:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://github.com/podman-container-tools/podman/releases/tag/v5.8.8">
	  <p>This release addresses (CVE-2026-94603), where a
	  "podman run" on a checkpoint image (any image with the
	  io.podman.annotations.checkpoint.runtime.name annotation) could
	  disable all sandboxing, including sandboxing specified by the
	  user, when the container was created.</p>
	  <p>Removed support for checkpoint images in podman run due to
	  serious security concerns with the different security models of
	  running images and running checkpoints. Checkpoints ignore
	  user-specified security configuration and are very difficult to
	  run safely.</p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-94603</cvename>
      <url>https://github.com/podman-container-tools/podman/releases/tag/v5.8.8</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-10-11</discovery>
      <entry>2026-10-11</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="0f5aaca7-c4d5-11f1-96b4-74563cf85f9d">
    <topic>py-WsgiDAV -- Multiple vulnerabilities</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
	<name>py311-WsgiDAV</name>
	<name>py312-WsgiDAV</name>
	<name>py313-WsgiDAV</name>
	<name>py313t-WsgiDAV</name>
	<name>py314-WsgiDAV</name>
	<name>py314t-WsgiDAV</name>
	<name>py315-WsgiDAV</name>
	<range><lt>4.3.5</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>cve@mitre.org reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-48099">
	  <p>WsgiDAV is a generic and extendable WebDAV server based on
	    WSGI. WsgiDAV 4.3.3 and prior can allow a WebDAV request path
	    containing an encoded parent-directory segment to escape the
	    configured filesystem share root in a specific path layout. The
	    issue is fixed with version 4.3.4.</p>
	</blockquote>
	<blockquote cite="https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-55509">
	  <p>WsgiDAV is a generic and extendable WebDAV server based on
	    WSGI. Prior to 4.3.5, the sample MySQLBrowserProvider in
	    wsgidav/samples/mysql_dav_provider.py concatenates the record key
	    parsed from a request URL directly into SQL WHERE clauses. The
	    affected _exists_record_by_primary_key, _get_field_by_primary_key,
	    and _get_record_by_primary_key methods are part of a shipped
	    example provider that is not enabled by default. An attacker who
	    can access a share explicitly configured with this non-default
	    provider can inject SQL through a normal GET request; anonymously
	    exposed read shares permit a status-code oracle and extraction of
	    arbitrary data reachable by the configured MySQL account. This
	    issue is fixed in version 4.3.5.</p>
	</blockquote>
	<p>The WsgiDAV project reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://github.com/mar10/wsgidav/security/advisories/GHSA-wm65-64rq-rh8r">
	  <p>When follow_symlinks is false (the default), WsgiDAV is expected
	    to prevent serving content through symbolic links - a request for
	    a symlink returns 403 Forbidden: Symlink support is disabled.
	    However, that guard inspects only the leaf component of the
	    resolved path, and the root-containment check is purely lexical
	    (os.path.abspath, which does not resolve symlinks).</p>
	  <p>As a result, a symlink used as an intermediate directory in the
	    request path is neither blocked by the guard nor caught by the
	    containment check, and the request escapes the configured share
	    root. This allows reading, writing, and deleting files outside the
	    root.</p>
	</blockquote>
      </body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-48099</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-55509</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-55560</cvename>
      <url>https://github.com/mar10/wsgidav/security/advisories/GHSA-wxq4-cc2q-338q</url>
      <url>https://github.com/mar10/wsgidav/security/advisories/GHSA-p6gw-4frg-j7jw</url>
      <url>https://github.com/mar10/wsgidav/security/advisories/GHSA-wm65-64rq-rh8r</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-05-27</discovery>
      <entry>2026-10-11</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="ec9017a0-c4fe-11f1-bbb3-901b0e9408dc">
    <topic>ejabberd -- Multiple security vulnerabilities</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
	<name>ejabberd</name>
	<range><lt>26.09</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>ejabberd team reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://www.process-one.net/blog/ejabberd-26-09/#security">
	  <ul>
	    <li>Unauthenticated Remote Code Execution on ejabberd (reported by Gia Bui) when:
	    <ul>
	      <li>ejabberd versions is at least 25.10</li>
	      <li>BOSH is enabled on any port</li>
	      <li>S2S is enabled</li>
	      <li>mod_adhoc_api is loaded</li>
	      <li>outbound connectivity from ejabberd on ports epmd
	      (default 4369), s2s (default 5269) and Erlang
	      distribution port (dynamically assigned, typically in
	      the range 49152-65535 unless FIREWALL_WINDOW is set in
	      ejabberdctl.cfg).</li>
	    </ul>
	    </li>
	    <li>DoS attack on 16.12+ versions if BOSH is enabled on any port.</li>
	    <li>Cross-Tenant MUC, Roster and Shared-Roster
	    unauthorized access (reported by Hoang Gia).</li>
	  </ul>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <url>https://www.process-one.net/blog/ejabberd-26-09/#security</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-09-30</discovery>
      <entry>2026-10-10</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="28c48cd9-e79a-4ad6-8e62-1317c2ec19a1">
    <topic>mutt -- Heap out-of-bounds write via crafted Content-Header line</topic>
    <affects>
	<package>
	  <name>mutt</name>
	  <range><lt>2.4.3</lt></range>
	</package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>Kevin J. McCarthy reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://gitlab.com/muttmua/mutt/-/work_items/533">
	 <p>
	  Fixing an OOB heap write. This is triggered by a specially
	  crafted Content-Header line in an email that is used as a
	  template for a new email, via &lt;resend-message &gt;.
	  Thanks to Calif.io, in collaboration with
	  Anthropic for sending me a detailed write up and
	  suggested patch.
	 </p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-107570</cvename>
      <url>https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-107570</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-10-08</discovery>
      <entry>2026-10-09</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="3de00266-caf6-11f1-881f-d89ef317b2fc">
    <topic>Drupal 10 and 11 -- remote code execution</topic>
    <affects>
    <package>
	<name>drupal11</name>
	<range><ge>11.4.0</ge><lt>11.4.10</lt></range>
    </package>
    <package>
	<name>drupal10</name>
	<range><lt>10.6.19</lt></range>
    </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>Drupal core reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://www.drupal.org/sa-core-2026-014">
	<p>
	  A remote code execution vulnerability exists within the
	  Field UI module in Drupal core.
	</p>
	<p>
	  The vulnerability is not directly exploitable with core
	  alone, but multiple serious exploit paths exist with
	  contributed modules. At least one known exploit path does
	  not require authentication. Custom code may also expose
	  the vulnerable functionality.
	</p>
	<p>
	  The vulnerability can be mitigated by uninstalling the
	  core Field UI module (field_ui), which will provide
	  protection while sites are updated.
	</p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-108097</cvename>
      <url>https://www.drupal.org/sa-core-2026-014</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-10-14</discovery>
      <entry>2026-10-18</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="049d88bb-c4a2-11f1-9d0b-5404a68ad561">
    <topic>traefik -- Multiple vulnerabilities</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
      <name>traefik</name>
      <range><lt>3.7.14</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
      <p>The traefik project releases a new version addressing multiple vulnerabilities:</p>
      <blockquote cite="https://github.com/traefik/traefik/releases/tag/v3.7.14">
      <ul>
      <li>GHSA-53qr-784g-cj35 (FastProxy backend connection pool leaks identity)</li>
      <li>GHSA-cw35-4q88-3rmp (NTLM/Kerberos sticky round tripper is not keyed by service)</li>
      <li>GHSA-fh26-gfpp-7xxx (snicheck skips the check when `req.TLS` is nil)</li>
      <li>GHSA-mwrr-6hp4-pxr6 (Ingress-NGINX provider forwards forged Ssl-Client-* identity headers</li>
      <li>GHSA-qm9f-w54v-q2qh (Preauthenticated Negotiate contaminates Traefik's backend connection pool</li>
      <li>GHSA-qvj7-gq9c-hp7q (ssl-passthrough sibling HTTP router serves the auth-protected backend without auth)</li>
      <li>GHSA-rv2h-qh7j-xrjw (colliding auth-tls-secret names merge two client CAs into one TLS option)</li>
      <li>GHSA-mhjw-hmjv-p99x (Unsynchroinized write to sticky round tripper shared by concurrent HTTP/2 streams)</li>
      </ul>
      </blockquote>
      </body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <url>https://github.com/traefik/traefik/releases/tag/v3.7.14</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-10-06</discovery>
      <entry>2026-10-10</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="2719a8da-c3f8-11f1-8da1-3497f65b111b">
    <topic>clamav -- Multiple vulnerabilities</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
	<name>clamav</name>
	<range><lt>1.5.4,1</lt></range>
      </package>
      <package>
	<name>clamav-lts</name>
	<range><lt>1.4.6,1</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>The ClamAV project reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://github.com/Cisco-Talos/clamav/releases/tag/clamav-1.4.6">
	  <ul>
	    <li>CVE-2026-20345: indexing error while converting GPT partition
	      names could read or write beyond a stack-allocated partition
	      entry.</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-20339: integer overflow in the PESpin unpacker could
	      allocate an undersized buffer and write beyond it.</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-20346: integer underflow in the PDF parser could
	      cause a crash while reading a malformed hex string.</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-20347: undefined behavior and integer overflow in
	      the Mach-O parser could cause a crash on a malformed
	      file.</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-20348: XAR parser size handling could request an
	      excessive allocation or exceed scan limits.</li>
	    <li>CVE-2025-8088: path separators in NTFS alternate data stream
	      names in the bundled UnRAR library could lead to extraction
	      outside the temporary scan directory.</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-20217: PESpin unpacker cleanup path could free
	      pointers into the scanned file buffer and crash the
	      scanner.</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-20213: integer overflow in PE rebuild size
	      calculations could lead to a heap buffer overflow write.</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-20216: InstallShield archive extraction limit bypass
	      could exhaust temporary storage.</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-20214: FSG unpacker loop underflow could write past
	      the section array.</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-20243: ALZ parser size handling bugs could abort the
	      scanner.</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-20215: 7z parser substream count overflow could
	      write past under-allocated metadata arrays.</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-20244: 32-bit DMG parser size checks could crash
	      32-bit scanner builds.</li>
	    <li>Thread-safety issues in the clamd STATS command could
	      disclose process memory or crash the daemon.</li>
	  </ul>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-20345</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-20339</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-20346</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-20347</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-20348</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2025-8088</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-20217</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-20213</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-20216</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-20214</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-20243</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-20215</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-20244</cvename>
      <url>https://github.com/Cisco-Talos/clamav/releases/tag/clamav-1.4.5</url>
      <url>https://github.com/Cisco-Talos/clamav/releases/tag/clamav-1.4.6</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-08-07</discovery>
      <entry>2026-10-09</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="26fd839c-c338-11f1-a6ea-8447094a420f">
    <topic>OpenSSH -- Multiple vulnerabilities</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
	<name>openssh-portable</name>
	<range><lt>10.6.p1,1</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>The OpenSSH project reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://www.openssh.org/txt/release-10.6">
	  <ul>
	    <li>sftp(1): more strictly validate paths returned from the server to
	      avoid some cases where a server could return paths that could
	      manipulate a recursive copy operation into writing outside its
	      target directory.</li>
	    <li>sshd(8): when GSSAPIAuthentication is in use, only store GSSAPI
	      credentials when authentication has succeeded. Avoids a situation
	      where credentials from a failed GSSAPIAuthentication attempt may
	      persist and be made inappropriately available if another
	      authentication subsequently succeeds.</li>
	    <li>sshd(8): reset GSSAPIAuthentication before authentication, avoiding
	      state from one authentication attempt being confused with that of
	      a later attempt.</li>
	    <li>sshd(8), ssh(1): disable LZ77 dictionary coder to mitigate the
	      side-channel leaks described in "Crossing the Streams: SSH
	      Plaintext Recovery via a Common Compression Context in
	      Multiplexed Channels"</li>
	    <li>ssh(1): disallow '$' and '\' characters in usernames entered on
	      the command-line to avoid usernames from untrusted sources
	      yielding injection in shell context via ProxyCommand, Match exec,
	      etc. Usernames specified via the configuration files are not
	      subject this this control.</li>
	    <li>ssh-keygen(1): correct handling of Daylight Saving Time when
	      converting dates. Previous handling could cause errors of
	      up to +/- 1 hour (unless you are in the Antarctica/Troll
	      timezone, where the error could be +/- 2 hours). These errors
	      could result in creation of certificates with incorrect expiry
	      times.</li>
	    <li>sshd(8), ssh(1): ensure that compressed payloads don't inflate
	      past the maximum supported packet length.</li>
	    <li>sshd(8): fully honor the authorized_keys "restrict" keyword,
	      which was not being properly applied to tunnel forwarding
	      (PermitTunnel, disabled by default).</li>
	    <li>sshd(8): correctly handle some options that accept "none". Some
	      options, including AuthorizedPrincipalsFile, were documented as
	      accepting "none" as a way to disable them; however, when
	      overridden by an sshd_config(5) Match keyword, this argument was
	      being incorrectly interpreted as a literal file.</li>
	    <li>sshd(8): on platforms that do not support file descriptor passing
	      and that require root for PTY allocation, the post-authentication
	      sshd-session process retains root privilege, whereas on other
	      platforms this process runs with the privilege of the logged-in
	      user. When sshd-session was run with elevated privilege, it could
	      perform certain actions as root and circumvent controls that
	      would normally have applied to the user, such as making unix
	      domain socket connections or binding (via -R forwarding) to low-
	      numbered TCP ports.</li>
	  </ul>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <url>https://www.openssh.org/txt/release-10.6</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-10-06</discovery>
      <entry>2026-10-08</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="06bf834f-c31f-11f1-9b94-901b0e13f1a0">
    <topic>xorg -- Multiple vulnerabilities</topic>
    <affects>
    <package>
	<name>xorg-server</name>
	<name>xephyr</name>
	<name>xorg-vfbserver</name>
	<range><lt>21.1.25,1</lt></range>
    </package>
    <package>
	<name>xorg-nestserver</name>
	<range><lt>21.1.25,2</lt></range>
    </package>
    <package>
	<name>xwayland</name>
	<range><lt>24.1.14,1</lt></range>
    </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>X.Org reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-announce/2026-October/003747.html">
	  <p>Multiple issues have been found in the X server and Xwayland implementations
	    published by X.Org for which we are releasing security fixes for in
	    xorg-server-21.1.25 and xwayland-24.1.14.
	    CVE-2026-88812: XKB SetGeometry TextDoodad Double Free
	    CVE-2026-93515: Present Extension Cross-Window Notify Use-After-Free
	    CVE-2026-93516: XInput Passive Grab modifierDevice Use-After-Free
	    CVE-2026-93517: GLX RenderLarge Heap Buffer Overflow
	    CVE-2026-93518: XKB ResizeKeyType Numeric Truncation
	    CVE-2026-93519: XFixes Pointer Barrier Event List Buffer Overflow
	    CVE-2026-93520: XKB ChangeKeycodeRange Heap Out-of-Bounds Write
	    CVE-2026-93521: RandR ChangeProviderProperty Heap Buffer Overflow
	    CVE-2026-93522: Glamor CopyArea CPU-FBO Heap Buffer Overflow
	    CVE-2026-93523: XInput2 PassiveUngrabDevice Modifier Out-of-Bounds Write
	    CVE-2026-93524: XKB SetMap Key Width/Action Count Desync Out-Of-Bounds Read
	    CVE-2026-93536: GestureBuildSprite Use-After-Free
	  </p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-88812</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-93515</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-93516</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-93517</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-93518</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-93519</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-93520</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-93521</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-93522</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-93523</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-93524</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-93536</cvename>
      <url>https://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-announce/2026-October/003747.html</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-10-07</discovery>
      <entry>2026-10-08</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="03302734-c15d-11f1-8561-107c611e671e">
    <topic>rabbitmq-c -- remote client-side memory exhaustion</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
	<name>rabbitmq-c</name>
	<range><lt>0.18.0</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>The rabbitmq-c project reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://github.com/alanxz/rabbitmq-c/security/advisories/GHSA-5fp7-wg2f-hhgp">
	  <p>A malicious AMQP peer can trigger memory exhaustion in
	  rabbitmq-c clients by sending frames with unrecognised types
	  or invalid channel numbers. The client allocates per-channel
	  memory pools and stores complete frames before validating the
	  channel against the negotiated limits or the frame type, and
	  discards unknown frames without releasing that memory,
	  allowing a sustained stream of small frames to exhaust client
	  resources.</p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <url>https://github.com/alanxz/rabbitmq-c/security/advisories/GHSA-5fp7-wg2f-hhgp</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-09-15</discovery>
      <entry>2026-10-06</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="03306014-c15d-11f1-acb8-107c611e671e">
    <topic>rabbitmq-c -- multiple vulnerabilities</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
	<name>rabbitmq-c</name>
	<range><lt>0.17.0</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>The rabbitmq-c project reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://github.com/alanxz/rabbitmq-c/security/advisories/GHSA-hfjv-vcp3-39wh">
	  <p>CVE-2026-61547: A heap buffer overflow exists when the
	  amqp_send_frame() API is used to serialise an oversized
	  AMQP_FRAME_BODY frame, as memcpy() writes past the end of the
	  heap allocation without validating that the body fragment
	  fits within the allocated frame buffer.</p>
	  <p>CVE-2026-59986: An integer overflow in the amqp_decode_bytes
	  bounds check on 32-bit systems allows a malicious AMQP broker
	  to craft frames with oversized BYTES fields, resulting in an
	  out-of-bounds read that may expose process memory or crash the
	  application.</p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-61547</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-59986</cvename>
      <url>https://github.com/alanxz/rabbitmq-c/security/advisories/GHSA-hfjv-vcp3-39wh</url>
      <url>https://github.com/alanxz/rabbitmq-c/security/advisories/GHSA-jgjf-7fwf-f3c7</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-07-02</discovery>
      <entry>2026-10-06</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="03308f12-c15d-11f1-ab87-107c611e671e">
    <topic>rabbitmq-c -- multiple vulnerabilities</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
	<name>rabbitmq-c</name>
	<range><lt>0.16.0</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>The rabbitmq-c project reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://github.com/alanxz/rabbitmq-c/security/advisories/GHSA-jh48-qjf5-fx5v">
	  <p>CVE-2026-44236: A malicious AMQP server can send an
	  undersized connection.tune.frame_max value during the login
	  handshake. The library does not enforce the protocol minimum
	  frame size, reallocates its outbound buffer to an invalid size
	  and then writes frame data beyond it, causing a heap buffer
	  overflow before authentication completes.</p>
	  <p>CVE-2026-44235: An unsigned integer underflow in the frame
	  length computation when parsing undersized AMQP frames
	  bypasses bounds checks in the property and table decoders,
	  leading to an out-of-bounds read and client-side denial of
	  service.</p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-44236</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-44235</cvename>
      <url>https://github.com/alanxz/rabbitmq-c/security/advisories/GHSA-jh48-qjf5-fx5v</url>
      <url>https://github.com/alanxz/rabbitmq-c/security/advisories/GHSA-9mmv-r8g3-qp46</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-06-09</discovery>
      <entry>2026-10-06</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="3a72cd47-c157-11f1-a6ea-8447094a420f">
    <topic>Vaultwarden -- Multiple vulnerabilities</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
	<name>vaultwarden</name>
	<range><lt>1.37.4</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>The Vaultwarden project reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://github.com/dani-garcia/vaultwarden/releases/tag/1.37.4">
	  <ul>
	    <li>Organization member revocation [GHSA-69q9-v8p6-xvx3] (High, 8.1)</li>
	    <li>Two-factor authentication [GHSA-7jg8-8m5x-6j9r] (Medium, 6.8)</li>
	    <li>Organization invitations [GHSA-v576-3wvq-xh3c] (Medium, 6.8)</li>
	    <li>Attachments [GHSA-q5x6-grh5-fqgc] (Medium, 6.5)</li>
	    <li>Organization event logs [GHSA-64mc-4p6f-r7x9] (Medium, 4.3)</li>
	    <li>Cipher sharing [GHSA-7ccc-c43j-4p36] (Medium, 4.3)</li>
	    <li>Organization API key [GHSA-qwx4-wcv4-mpcv] (Low, 3.8)</li>
	  </ul>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <url>https://github.com/dani-garcia/vaultwarden/releases/tag/1.37.4</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-10-06</discovery>
      <entry>2026-10-06</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="85bcb950-c0b4-11f1-a6ea-8447094a420f">
    <topic>LibreSSL -- Multiple vulnerabilities</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
	<name>libressl</name>
	<range><lt>4.3.3</lt></range>
      </package>
      <package>
	<name>libressl-devel</name>
	<range><lt>4.3.3</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>The LibreSSL project reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://ftp.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/LibreSSL/libressl-4.3.3-relnotes.txt">
	  <ul>
	    <li>Ensure verify callbacks always returning 1 can see a hostname mismatch</li>
	    <li>Correct botched size check in dtls1_preprocess_fragment()</li>
	    <li>Limit size of buffered DTLS handshake messages</li>
	    <li>Avoid potential overread on interrupted retransmission in DTLS</li>
	    <li>Fix OCSP responder authorization bypass in libtls and ocspcheck(8)</li>
	  </ul>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <url>https://ftp.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/LibreSSL/libressl-4.3.3-relnotes.txt</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-10-04</discovery>
      <entry>2026-10-05</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="45921d77-b346-11f1-952f-589cfc023192">
    <topic>bind920 -- multiple vulnerabilities</topic>
    <affects>
	<package>
	  <name>bind920</name>
	  <range><lt>9.20.29</lt></range>
	</package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>ISC team reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://downloads.isc.org/isc/bind9/9.20.29/doc/arm/html/notes.html#security-fixes">
	  <p>CVE-2026-19668: Resource Exhaustion via Excessive DNSSEC Cryptographic Material Matching</p>
	  <p>CVE-2026-19033: Unauthenticated IXFR deltas are applied to the live zone before TSIG verification</p>
	  <p>CVE-2026-77119: NSEC3 insecure-referral proof can use unrelated cached NSEC3 RRsets</p>
	  <p>CVE-2026-19941: checkwildcard() accepts an out-of-zone NSEC as a wildcard-nonexistence proof</p>
	  <p>CVE-2026-19666: Use-after-free in query_addnoqnameproof() via the DNS64 filter64 path</p>
	  <p>CVE-2026-19667: Remote assertion failure via 16-bit length truncation in dns_ncache_add()</p>
	  <p>CVE-2026-19662: qpcache NOQNAME proof use-after-free crashes recursive resolver</p>
	  <p>CVE-2026-75029: Message parser retains every identical singleton RDATA, enabling wire-to-work amplification</p>
	  <p>CVE-2026-77692: Unauthenticated remote crash of named via a single DoH SIG(0) request</p>
	  <p>CVE-2026-81736: Remote CPU denial of service through cached SVCB/HTTPS AliasMode trees</p>
	  <p>CVE-2026-76163: named aborts on a TKEY query when the user configuration has no global options statement</p>
	  <p>CVE-2026-78301: Out-of-zone database nodes can become authoritative zone cuts</p>
	  <p>CVE-2026-80274: Validating resolver can abort while caching a mismatched NOQNAME proof</p>
	  <p>CVE-2026-81563: SVCB AliasMode additional-data error leaks qpcache references</p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-19668</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-19033</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-77119</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-19941</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-19666</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-19667</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-19662</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-75029</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-77692</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-81736</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-76163</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-78301</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-80274</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-81563</cvename>
      <url>https://kb.isc.org/docs/cve-2026-19668</url>
      <url>https://kb.isc.org/docs/cve-2026-19033</url>
      <url>https://kb.isc.org/docs/cve-2026-77119</url>
      <url>https://kb.isc.org/docs/cve-2026-19941</url>
      <url>https://kb.isc.org/docs/cve-2026-19666</url>
      <url>https://kb.isc.org/docs/cve-2026-19667</url>
      <url>https://kb.isc.org/docs/cve-2026-19662</url>
      <url>https://kb.isc.org/docs/cve-2026-75029</url>
      <url>https://kb.isc.org/docs/cve-2026-77692</url>
      <url>https://kb.isc.org/docs/cve-2026-81736</url>
      <url>https://kb.isc.org/docs/cve-2026-76163</url>
      <url>https://kb.isc.org/docs/cve-2026-78301</url>
      <url>https://kb.isc.org/docs/cve-2026-80274</url>
      <url>https://kb.isc.org/docs/cve-2026-81563</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-09-16</discovery>
      <entry>2026-10-04</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="7fed71c4-be3a-11f1-ab8d-00a0980083d7">
    <topic>libexpat -- Improper Handling of Unicode Encoding</topic>
    <affects>
    <package>
	<name>expat</name>
	<range><lt>2.8.5</lt></range>
    </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>https://github.com/libexpat/libexpat/pull/1282 reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://github.com/libexpat/libexpat/pull/1282">
	  <p>Expat before 2.8.5 fails to validate that a high surrogate in
	  UTF-16 input is followed by a low surrogate, allowing malformed
	  UTF-16 sequences to be accepted. Attackers can supply UTF-16 encoded
	  XML containing lone high surrogates that consume the following code
	  unit, causing Expat to pass unpaired surrogates to applications
	  built with XML_UNICODE and to silently replace input characters in
	  other builds.</p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-93990</cvename>
      <url>https://cveawg.mitre.org/api/cve/CVE-2026-93990</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-09-19</discovery>
      <entry>2026-10-04</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="a28dd61b-be3e-11f1-bd34-3c7c3fba4204">
    <topic>Keycloak -- multiple vulnerabilities</topic>
    <affects>
	<package>
	  <name>keycloak</name>
	  <range><lt>26.8.0</lt></range>
	</package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>The Keycloak Team reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://www.keycloak.org/2026/10/keycloak-2680-released">
	  <ul>
	    <li>[CVE-2026-12388]: IdP mapper admin role escalation.</li>
	    <li>[CVE-2026-14781]: OIDC broker applies id_token email_verified to userinfo email, marking unverified addresses as verified.</li>
	    <li>[CVE-2026-19608]: Name-only group claims let same-name groups satisfy path-specific group policies.</li>
	    <li>[CVE-2026-54515], [CVE-2026-59889]: Third-party dependency fix, com.fasterxml.jackson.core:jackson-databind 2.22.0.</li>
	    <li>[CVE-2026-59903]: Third-party dependency fix, io.netty:netty-codec-http:4.1.136.Final.</li>
	  </ul>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-12388</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-14781</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-19608</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-54515</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-59889</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-59903</cvename>
      <url>https://www.keycloak.org/2026/10/keycloak-2680-released</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-10-01</discovery>
      <entry>2026-10-02</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="ed670f20-bdc3-11f1-a6ea-8447094a420f">
    <topic>Apache httpd -- Multiple vulnerabilities</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
	<name>apache24</name>
	<range><lt>2.4.69</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>The Apache httpd project reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://downloads.apache.org/httpd/CHANGES_2.4.69">
	  <ul>
	    <li>limited RCE for some internal redirects to non-CGI files in CGI directories (CVE-2026-42356) [low]</li>
	    <li>mod_dav shared lock overflow (CVE-2026-42528) [moderate]</li>
	    <li>mod_heartmonitor denial of service (CVE-2026-46729) [low]</li>
	    <li>mod_session: Session cookie not removed during internal redirect (CVE-2026-47360) [low]</li>
	    <li>mod_auth_digest reauthentication attack (CVE-2026-48005) [low]</li>
	    <li>mod_charset_lite: Heap overflow in finish_partial_char (CVE-2026-56153) [low]</li>
	    <li>mod_rewrite use-after-free via %{LA-U:HTTP:...} (CVE-2026-56154) [low]</li>
	    <li>mod_proxy_html: crash in dump_content (CVE-2026-56449) [low]</li>
	    <li>mod_http2 use-after-free / wild write via shared session->bbtmp re-entrancy (CVE-2026-57941) [moderate]</li>
	    <li>mod_dav_fs property database read access (CVE-2026-58415) [low]</li>
	    <li>Out-of-Bounds Write in ap_directory_walk() Canonical-Name Rewrite on CASE_BLIND_FILESYSTEM (CVE-2026-59685) [moderate]</li>
	    <li>mod_ssl SSLRequire allows .htaccess ap_expr file-function (CVE-2026-59797) [low]</li>
	    <li>mod_proxy_ftp PASV address handling (CVE-2026-63045) [low]</li>
	    <li>mod_vhost_alias stack overflow (CVE-2026-63292) [moderate]</li>
	    <li>mod_xml2enc crash on charset conversion failure (CVE-2026-63686) [low]</li>
	    <li>mod_proxy_uwsgi Transfer-Encoding response smuggling (CVE-2026-63718) [low]</li>
	    <li>mod_auth_digest one-time-nonce replay attack (CVE-2026-73636) [low]</li>
	    <li>mod_auth_digest DoS attack (CVE-2026-73637) [low]</li>
	    <li>mod_userdir information disclosure (CVE-2026-79768) [low]</li>
	    <li>mod_dav_fs namespace overflow (CVE-2026-93546) [moderate]</li>
	  </ul>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-42356</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-42528</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-46729</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-47360</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-48005</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-56153</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-56154</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-56449</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-57941</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-58415</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-59685</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-59797</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-63045</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-63292</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-63686</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-63718</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-73636</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-73637</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-79768</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-93546</cvename>
      <url>https://downloads.apache.org/httpd/CHANGES_2.4.69</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-10-01</discovery>
      <entry>2026-10-01</entry>
      <modified>2026-10-04</modified>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="a93ff4d6-bdcd-11f1-af91-9cbf0d00daec">
    <topic>arti -- Various security issues</topic>
    <affects>
<package>
<name>arti</name>
<range><lt>2.7.0</lt></range>
</package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>Torproject reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://gitlab.torproject.org/tpo/core/arti/-/blob/arti-v2.7.0/CHANGELOG.md">
	  <p>Various security issues discovered in versions below 2.7.0.</p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <url>https://gitlab.torproject.org/tpo/core/arti/-/blob/arti-v2.7.0/CHANGELOG.md</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-10-01</discovery>
      <entry>2026-10-01</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="a7738854-bc00-11f1-a829-dca632daf43b">
    <topic>apache-commons-lang -- Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability</topic>
    <affects>
    <package>
      <name>apache-commons-lang</name>
      <range><ge>2.0</ge><lt>2.7</lt></range>
    </package>
    <package>
      <name>apache-commons-lang3</name>
      <range><ge>3.0</ge><lt>3.18.0</lt></range>
    </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>OSS-Fuzz, Gary Gregory reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2025/07/11/1">
	  <p>Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in Apache Commons Lang. This issue affects Apache Commons Lang: Starting with commons-lang:commons-lang 2.0 to 2.6, and, from org.apache.commons:commons-lang3 3.0 before 3.18.0. The methods ClassUtils.getClass(...) can throw StackOverflowError on very long inputs. Because an Error is usually not handled by applications and libraries, a StackOverflowError could cause an application to stop. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 3.18.0, which fixes the issue.</p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2025-48924</cvename>
      <url>https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/cve-2025-48924</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2025-07-11</discovery>
      <entry>2026-09-29</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="0ef2a442-bd49-11f1-bbb3-901b0e9408dc">
    <topic>conduit -- account takeover vulnerability</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
	<name>matrix-conduit</name>
	<range><lt>0.10.14</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>Conduit team reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://gitlab.com/famedly/conduit/-/releases/v0.10.14">
	  <p>Fixes a vulnerability allowing an attacker with an account
	  on the server to gain access to any other account. It is
	  recommended you upgrade ASAP.</p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <url>https://gitlab.com/famedly/conduit/-/releases/v0.10.14</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-09-26</discovery>
      <entry>2026-10-01</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="6d92b2a3-bcce-11f1-906f-bc241121aa0a">
    <topic>FreeBSD -- IPv6 UDP sendto(2) bypasses jail loopback restriction</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
	<name>FreeBSD-kernel</name>
	<range><ge>15.1</ge><lt>15.1_4</lt></range>
	<range><ge>15.0</ge><lt>15.0_14</lt></range>
	<range><ge>14.5</ge><lt>14.5_1</lt></range>
	<range><ge>14.4</ge><lt>14.4_10</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<h1>Problem Description:</h1>
	  <p>The IPv6 UDP send path for unconnected sockets did not apply
	  the jail policy of rewriting a loopback destination address to the
	  jail's primary IPv6 address.</p>
	<h1>Impact:</h1>
	  <p>A process in a classic (non-VNET) jail can send UDP datagrams
	  to services listening on the host's IPv6 loopback address, bypassing
	  jail network isolation.</p>
      </body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-101303</cvename>
      <freebsdsa>SA-26:69.udp</freebsdsa>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-09-29</discovery>
      <entry>2026-09-30</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="36c2abd8-bcce-11f1-906f-bc241121aa0a">
    <topic>FreeBSD -- Remote DoS via receive-side kernel TLS</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
	<name>FreeBSD-kernel</name>
	<range><ge>15.1</ge><lt>15.1_4</lt></range>
	<range><ge>15.0</ge><lt>15.0_14</lt></range>
	<range><ge>14.5</ge><lt>14.5_1</lt></range>
	<range><ge>14.4</ge><lt>14.4_10</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<h1>Problem Description:</h1>
	  <p>TLS 1.3 embeds the actual record type as the last non-zero byte
	  of the decrypted payload, optionally followed by zero padding.  The
	  code which searches for the inner record type had an off-by-one bug
	  which could be triggered by an invalid frame, leading to an underflow
	  followed by an unconditional NULL pointer dereference, causing a
	  kernel panic.</p>
	<h1>Impact:</h1>
	  <p>A remote TLS 1.3 peer can send a specially crafted record to
	  trigger a kernel panic, resulting in a Denial of Service (DoS).</p>
      </body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-101302</cvename>
      <freebsdsa>SA-26:67.ktls</freebsdsa>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-09-29</discovery>
      <entry>2026-09-30</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="1fe3495b-bccd-11f1-906f-bc241121aa0a">
    <topic>FreeBSD -- Multiple jail filesystem root escapes</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
	<name>FreeBSD-kernel</name>
	<range><ge>15.1</ge><lt>15.1_4</lt></range>
	<range><ge>15.0</ge><lt>15.0_14</lt></range>
	<range><ge>14.5</ge><lt>14.5_1</lt></range>
	<range><ge>14.4</ge><lt>14.4_10</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<h1>Problem Description:</h1>
	  <p>Three flaws allow a jailed process to bypass FD_RESOLVE_BENEATH:</p>
	  <ol>
	  <li>When fdescfs(4) was mounted in a jail with the "nodup" option,
	  opening /dev/fd/N returned a descriptor that did not inherit
	  FD_RESOLVE_BENEATH or the Capsicum capability rights of descriptor
	  N.  (CVE-2026-101304)</li>
	  <li>renameat(2) did not enforce FD_RESOLVE_BENEATH on its directory
	  arguments.  A jailed process could rename a directory relative to
	  a restricted descriptor, then escape the jail root via fchdir(2).
	  This requires the directory to reside on a filesystem that is also
	  reachable from the jail's root.  (CVE-2026-101305)</li>
	  <li>SCM_RIGHTS file descriptor passing did not preserve FD_RESOLVE_BENEATH
	  when a descriptor was transferred.  A process could clear the
	  restriction by sending the descriptor to itself over a Unix domain
	  socket.  (CVE-2026-101306)</li>
	  </ol>
	<h1>Impact:</h1>
	  <p>A process in a jail that has received a directory file descriptor
	  from another jail can use these techniques to escape the jail's
	  filesystem root restriction.</p>
      </body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-101304</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-101305</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-101306</cvename>
      <freebsdsa>SA-26:66.jail</freebsdsa>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-09-29</discovery>
      <entry>2026-09-30</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="d725b228-bccc-11f1-906f-bc241121aa0a">
    <topic>FreeBSD -- Memory safety bugs in kqueue copy-on-fork implementation</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
	<name>FreeBSD-kernel</name>
	<range><ge>15.1</ge><lt>15.1_4</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<h1>Problem Description:</h1>
	  <p>When copying knotes from a parent kqueue to a child, the copy
	  code did not correctly exclude marker knotes (used internally to
	  track list traversal position) before marking them as in-flux and
	  releasing the kqueue lock.  If another thread freed a marker while
	  the lock was dropped, the subsequent in-flux decrement operated on
	  freed memory.  (CVE-2026-58099)</p>
	  <p>kqueue_fork_copy_knote() indexed into the child's file descriptor
	  table using a knote's file descriptor number without a bounds check.
	  Because the child's table is copied before knotes are transferred,
	  a concurrent thread in the parent could grow the parent's table and
	  register knotes with file descriptor numbers beyond the end of the
	  child's table, causing an out-of-bounds read.  (CVE-2026-58100)</p>
	<h1>Impact:</h1>
	  <p>An unprivileged local user may be able to exploit these races
	  to escalate privileges.</p>
      </body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-58099</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-58100</cvename>
      <freebsdsa>SA-26:65.kqueue</freebsdsa>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-09-29</discovery>
      <entry>2026-09-30</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="6ef25129-bccc-11f1-906f-bc241121aa0a">
    <topic>FreeBSD -- Heap out-of-bounds access in semop(2)</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
	<name>FreeBSD-kernel</name>
	<range><ge>15.1</ge><lt>15.1_4</lt></range>
	<range><ge>15.0</ge><lt>15.0_14</lt></range>
	<range><ge>14.5</ge><lt>14.5_1</lt></range>
	<range><ge>14.4</ge><lt>14.4_10</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<h1>Problem Description:</h1>
	  <p>When semop(2) blocks waiting for a semaphore condition, it
	  releases the per-set lock and sleeps.  Upon waking, it checks the
	  sequence number embedded in the semaphore set's IPC identifier to
	  detect whether the set was removed while the caller was asleep.
	  This sequence number is only 15 bits wide.  If enough semaphore
	  sets are created and destroyed in the same table slot while a caller
	  is blocked, the counter wraps around, and semop(2) may falsely
	  conclude that the original set still exists.  The subsequent access
	  to a semaphore within the set may then be out of bounds.</p>
	<h1>Impact:</h1>
	  <p>An unprivileged local user can trigger an out-of-bounds access
	  on kernel heap memory, potentially leading to privilege escalation.</p>
      </body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-58098</cvename>
      <freebsdsa>SA-26:64.sysvsem</freebsdsa>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-09-29</discovery>
      <entry>2026-09-30</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="0d183075-bcb5-11f1-b09d-8447094a420f">
    <topic>OpenSSL -- Multiple vulnerabilities</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
	<name>openssl</name>
	<range><lt>3.5.9,1</lt></range>
      </package>
      <package>
	<name>openssl30</name>
	<range><lt>3.0.23</lt></range>
      </package>
      <package>
	<name>openssl34</name>
	<range><lt>3.4.8</lt></range>
      </package>
      <package>
	<name>openssl36</name>
	<range><lt>3.6.5</lt></range>
      </package>
      <package>
	<name>openssl40</name>
	<range><lt>4.0.3</lt></range>
      </package>
      <package>
	<name>FreeBSD</name>
	<range><ge>15.1</ge><lt>15.1_4</lt></range>
	<range><ge>15.0</ge><lt>15.0_14</lt></range>
	<range><ge>14.5</ge><lt>14.5_1</lt></range>
	<range><ge>14.4</ge><lt>14.4_10</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>The OpenSSL project reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://openssl-library.org/news/secadv/20260929.txt">
	  <ul>
	    <li>DTLS Retransmits Handshake Messages From a Stale Buffer Offset (CVE-2026-84782) [High]</li>
	    <li>Use-After-Free in X.509 Extension Cache Under Concurrent Use (CVE-2026-84783) [Moderate]</li>
	    <li>Excessive Memory Allocation in Relative CRLDP Processing (CVE-2026-35189) [Low]</li>
	    <li>QUIC Unvalidated Amplification Credit may be Over Accounted (CVE-2026-35191) [Low]</li>
	    <li>Potential CPU DoS via O(n^2) Fragment Reassembly in QUIC (CVE-2026-42772) [Low]</li>
	    <li>Timing Side-Channel in Scalar Multiplication for Non-NIST EC Curves (CVE-2026-54872) [Low]</li>
	    <li>QUIC STREAM Fragment Metadata DoS (CVE-2026-54873) [Low]</li>
	    <li>Non-Constant-Time SM2 Scalar Multiplication on ARM64 and RISC-V (CVE-2026-54875) [Low]</li>
	    <li>Out-of-Bounds Access After SSL_set_SSL_CTX() During a Handshake (CVE-2026-72897) [Low]</li>
	    <li>QUIC Connection-Level Flow Control is Not Enforced for Streams (CVE-2026-75804) [Low]</li>
	    <li>NULL Pointer Dereference in CMP Client Revocation Response Handling (CVE-2026-75805) [Low]</li>
	    <li>Unauthenticated and Undersized DTLS 1.2 AEAD Record Causes DoS (CVE-2026-75806) [Low]</li>
	    <li>Timing Side-Channel in SM2 Signature Generation (CVE-2026-77696) [Low]</li>
	    <li>QUIC: Unbounded RETIRE_CONNECTION_ID Backlog (CVE-2026-84784) [Low]</li>
	  </ul>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-84782</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-84783</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-35189</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-35191</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-42772</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-54872</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-54873</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-54875</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-72897</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-75804</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-75805</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-75806</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-77696</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-84784</cvename>
      <url>https://openssl-library.org/news/secadv/20260929.txt</url>
      <freebsdsa>SA-26:68.openssl</freebsdsa>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-09-29</discovery>
      <entry>2026-09-30</entry>
      <modified>2026-09-30</modified>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="15e880b4-b9ed-11f1-b17e-3c7c3fba4204">
    <topic>Fetchmail -- NTLM potential remote code execution</topic>
    <affects>
	<package>
	    <name>fetchmail</name>
	    <range><ge>5.0.8</ge><lt>6.6.7</lt></range>
	</package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>Fetchmail reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://www.fetchmail.info/fetchmail-SA-2026-01.txt">
	  <p>[CVE-2026-94184]: Fetchmail's NTLM authentication client can in some cases be susceptible to a remote code execution from a malicious server when fetchmail is configured with the NTLM feature enabled, depending on build details. fetchmail 6.6.7 release candidates, 6.6.7 and subsequent releases are unaffected.</p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-94184</cvename>
      <url>https://www.fetchmail.info/fetchmail-SA-2026-01.txt</url>
      <url>https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/cve-2026-94184</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-06-27</discovery>
      <entry>2026-09-26</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="bd24bc14-b9a9-11f1-bf98-a8a1599412c6">
    <topic>chromium -- security fixes</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
       <name>chromium</name>
       <range><lt>154.0.8037.57</lt></range>
      </package>
      <package>
       <name>ungoogled-chromium</name>
       <range><lt>154.0.8037.57</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
       <p>Chrome Releases reports:</p>
       <blockquote cite="https://chromereleases.googleblog.com/2026/09/stable-channel-update-for-desktop_0856730748.html">
	 <p>This update includes 108 security fixes:</p>
	 <ul>
	    <li>[551573368] Critical CVE-2026-95350: Buffer overflow in ANGLE.</li>
	    <li>[530045332] Critical CVE-2026-95357: Out of bounds write in GPU.</li>
	    <li>[548585299] Critical CVE-2026-95339: Use after free in ServiceWorker.</li>
	    <li>[551708184] Critical CVE-2026-95281: Buffer overflow in ANGLE.</li>
	    <li>[552665794] Critical CVE-2026-95313: Use after free in Fullscreen.</li>
	    <li>[553172761] Critical CVE-2026-95349: Buffer overflow in WebGL.</li>
	    <li>[556435507] Critical CVE-2026-95284: Buffer overflow in ANGLE.</li>
	    <li>[556576992] Critical CVE-2026-95322: Out of bounds write in GPU.</li>
	    <li>[559320837] Critical CVE-2026-95329: Out of bounds write in WebGL.</li>
	    <li>[560439699] Critical CVE-2026-95356: Use after free in WindowDialog.</li>
	    <li>[562151598] Critical CVE-2026-95310: Use after free in AdFilter.</li>
	    <li>[540265100] High CVE-2026-95301: Missing authorization in Extensions.</li>
	    <li>[543471693] High CVE-2026-95291: UI misrepresentation in SecurityIndicators.</li>
	    <li>[508462481] High CVE-2026-95355: Incorrect authorization in Navigation.</li>
	    <li>[517661385] High CVE-2026-95315: Use after free in Aura.</li>
	    <li>[520516206] High CVE-2026-95298: Use after free in Browser.</li>
	    <li>[534997484] High CVE-2026-95372: Use after free in Chromecast.</li>
	    <li>[537857253] High CVE-2026-95324: Uninitialized resource in GPU.</li>
	    <li>[543141419] High CVE-2026-95283: Buffer overflow in Tint.</li>
	    <li>[550953039] High CVE-2026-95293: Uninitialized resource in GPU.</li>
	    <li>[553116160] High CVE-2026-95274: Improper output encoding in DevTools.</li>
	    <li>[553129513] High CVE-2026-95282: Use after free in Platform.</li>
	    <li>[553130481] High CVE-2026-95373: Use after free in DevTools.</li>
	    <li>[553136141] High CVE-2026-95277: Use after free in Views.</li>
	    <li>[554558320] High CVE-2026-95348: Use after free in Bluetooth.</li>
	    <li>[555299641] High CVE-2026-95335: Use after free in HID.</li>
	    <li>[556535630] High CVE-2026-95338: Use after free in PDFium.</li>
	    <li>[556576976] High CVE-2026-95318: Buffer overflow in Video.</li>
	    <li>[557523002] High CVE-2026-95286: Type confusion in Bindings.</li>
	    <li>[558764482] High CVE-2026-95365: Type confusion in IndexedDB.</li>
	    <li>[559815527] High CVE-2026-95343: Use after free in WebAudio.</li>
	    <li>[560406548] High CVE-2026-95280: Race condition in V8.</li>
	    <li>[560536731] High CVE-2026-95304: Out of bounds write in V8.</li>
	    <li>[560536735] High CVE-2026-95306: Type confusion in V8.</li>
	    <li>[561997427] High CVE-2026-95299: Use after free in GPU.</li>
	    <li>[562242429] High CVE-2026-95351: Use after free in Views.</li>
	    <li>[495529018] Medium CVE-2026-95287: Missing authorization in Navigation.</li>
	    <li>[497204165] Medium CVE-2026-95366: Use of released resource in Core.</li>
	    <li>[497212105] Medium CVE-2026-95382: Improper input validation in Auth.</li>
	    <li>[497603247] Medium CVE-2026-95381: Improper input validation in Printing.</li>
	    <li>[500127519] Medium CVE-2026-95331: Out of bounds write in ANGLE.</li>
	    <li>[501648493] Medium CVE-2026-95297: Missing authorization in Contextual Tasks.</li>
	    <li>[502179319] Medium CVE-2026-95375: Incorrect authorization in BrowserTag.</li>
	    <li>[502242455] Medium CVE-2026-95302: Incorrect authorization in WebAPKs.</li>
	    <li>[511791538] Medium CVE-2026-95362: Cross-site request forgery in DevTools.</li>
	    <li>[513049042] Medium CVE-2026-95369: Inappropriate implementation in XML.</li>
	    <li>[513134076] Medium CVE-2026-95376: Externally controlled reference in DevTools.</li>
	    <li>[513162143] Medium CVE-2026-95359: Uninitialized resource in GPU.</li>
	    <li>[513992281] Medium CVE-2026-95294: UI misrepresentation in Browser.</li>
	    <li>[514019137] Medium CVE-2026-95337: UI misrepresentation in Messages.</li>
	    <li>[514059630] Medium CVE-2026-95346: UI misrepresentation in Chromoting.</li>
	    <li>[514072284] Medium CVE-2026-95320: Missing authorization in Navigation.</li>
	    <li>[514487499] Medium CVE-2026-95317: Incorrect authorization in MediaCapture.</li>
	    <li>[516404074] Medium CVE-2026-95345: Use after free in Actor.</li>
	    <li>[517163294] Medium CVE-2026-95330: Improper state validation in Downloads.</li>
	    <li>[517417437] Medium CVE-2026-95370: Inappropriate implementation in NFC.</li>
	    <li>[517442714] Medium CVE-2026-95303: Incomplete cleanup in SmartCard.</li>
	    <li>[517584808] Medium CVE-2026-95360: Race condition in Editing.</li>
	    <li>[517596255] Medium CVE-2026-95295: Information leak in Mobile.</li>
	    <li>[517730821] Medium CVE-2026-95276: Improper input validation in Themes.</li>
	    <li>[517802696] Medium CVE-2026-95314: Incorrect authorization in HID.</li>
	    <li>[520504291] Medium CVE-2026-95371: Missing authorization in Views.</li>
	    <li>[522061704] Medium CVE-2026-95353: Use after free in Bindings.</li>
	    <li>[522344883] Medium CVE-2026-95363: UI misrepresentation in FileSystem.</li>
	    <li>[523719002] Medium CVE-2026-95341: Improper input validation in Desktop.</li>
	    <li>[524582798] Medium CVE-2026-95354: Use after free in Verifier.</li>
	    <li>[526550688] Medium CVE-2026-95384: Race condition in Transactions Platform.</li>
	    <li>[532962621] Medium CVE-2026-95336: Information leak in Transactions Platform.</li>
	    <li>[536161355] Medium CVE-2026-95290: Missing authorization in NFC.</li>
	    <li>[536648933] Medium CVE-2026-95325: Use after free in ANGLE.</li>
	    <li>[542926849] Medium CVE-2026-95275: Incorrect reference resolution in MediaStream.</li>
	    <li>[543464436] Medium CVE-2026-95374: Incorrect authorization in Network.</li>
	    <li>[545449081] Medium CVE-2026-95300: Missing authorization in DevTools.</li>
	    <li>[545879261] Medium CVE-2026-95321: UI misrepresentation in Payments.</li>
	    <li>[546438368] Medium CVE-2026-95323: UI misrepresentation in Chromium.</li>
	    <li>[546639650] Medium CVE-2026-95332: Use of uninitialized variable in Tint.</li>
	    <li>[547832510] Medium CVE-2026-95312: Information leak in Passwords.</li>
	    <li>[548611433] Medium CVE-2026-95344: Race condition in DevTools.</li>
	    <li>[549911100] Medium CVE-2026-95289: Incorrect authorization in Scroll.</li>
	    <li>[550181232] Medium CVE-2026-95347: Use after free in Updater.</li>
	    <li>[553123003] Medium CVE-2026-95311: Free of non-heap memory in Fonts.</li>
	    <li>[553141660] Medium CVE-2026-95358: Incorrect authorization in Mobile.</li>
	    <li>[559682346] Medium CVE-2026-95333: Use after free in Metrics.</li>
	    <li>[423956129] Low CVE-2026-95307: UI misrepresentation in ExtensionsMenu.</li>
	    <li>[497094708] Low CVE-2026-95285: Missing authorization in WebView.</li>
	    <li>[497344014] Low CVE-2026-95278: Missing authorization in WakeLock.</li>
	    <li>[502077689] Low CVE-2026-95327: Information leak in Networking.</li>
	    <li>[513403696] Low CVE-2026-95334: Incorrect reference resolution in WebProtect.</li>
	    <li>[513714849] Low CVE-2026-95308: Integer overflow in Metrics.</li>
	    <li>[513781838] Low CVE-2026-95292: Incorrect authorization in Safebrowsing.</li>
	    <li>[513791872] Low CVE-2026-95352: Incorrect authorization in DevTools.</li>
	    <li>[514012689] Low CVE-2026-95279: UI misrepresentation in Omnibox.</li>
	    <li>[514524620] Low CVE-2026-95367: Information leak in DataTransfer.</li>
	    <li>[517192965] Low CVE-2026-95385: Inappropriate implementation in PlatformIntegration.</li>
	    <li>[522413520] Low CVE-2026-95368: Incorrect authorization in DevTools.</li>
	    <li>[523765972] Low CVE-2026-95319: Use after free in Printing.</li>
	    <li>[533041383] Low CVE-2026-95326: Incomplete cleanup in Bluetooth.</li>
	    <li>[533074595] Low CVE-2026-95309: UI misrepresentation in Mobile.</li>
	    <li>[533095855] Low CVE-2026-95361: Confused deputy in DevTools.</li>
	    <li>[533102653] Low CVE-2026-95288: UI misrepresentation in Mobile.</li>
	    <li>[534579660] Low CVE-2026-95380: Type confusion in V8.</li>
	    <li>[547027738] Low CVE-2026-95342: Missing authorization in V8.</li>
	    <li>[551296612] Low CVE-2026-95296: Missing authorization in Core.</li>
	    <li>[552023752] Low CVE-2026-95316: Unchecked return value in Performance.</li>
	    <li>[553148673] Low CVE-2026-95328: Confused deputy in Mobile.</li>
	    <li>[553268567] Low CVE-2026-95340: Incorrect authorization in PictureInPicture.</li>
	    <li>[553271219] Low CVE-2026-95364: Improper input validation in Passwords.</li>
	    <li>[553921181] Low CVE-2026-95305: UI misrepresentation in Chromoting.</li>
	 </ul>
       </blockquote>
      </body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-95350</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-95357</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-95339</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-95281</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-95313</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-95349</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-95284</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-95322</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-95329</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-95356</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-95310</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-95301</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-95291</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-95355</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-95315</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-95298</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-95372</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-95324</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-95283</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-95293</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-95274</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-95282</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-95373</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-95277</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-95348</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-95335</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-95338</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-95318</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-95286</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-95365</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-95343</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-95280</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-95304</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-95306</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-95299</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-95351</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-95287</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-95366</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-95382</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-95381</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-95331</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-95297</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-95375</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-95302</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-95362</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-95369</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-95376</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-95359</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-95294</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-95337</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-95346</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-95320</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-95317</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-95345</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-95330</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-95370</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-95303</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-95360</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-95295</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-95276</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-95314</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-95371</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-95353</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-95363</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-95341</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-95354</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-95384</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-95336</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-95290</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-95325</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-95275</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-95374</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-95300</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-95321</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-95323</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-95332</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-95312</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-95344</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-95289</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-95347</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-95311</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-95358</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-95333</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-95307</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-95285</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-95278</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-95327</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-95334</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-95308</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-95292</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-95352</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-95279</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-95367</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-95385</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-95368</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-95319</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-95326</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-95309</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-95361</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-95288</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-95380</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-95342</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-95296</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-95316</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-95328</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-95340</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-95364</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-95305</cvename>
      <url>https://chromereleases.googleblog.com/2026/09/stable-channel-update-for-desktop_0856730748.html</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-09-22</discovery>
      <entry>2026-09-26</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="501ff33c-b996-11f1-ad2b-40b034429ecf">
    <topic>p5-YAML-Syck -- Multiple vulnerabilities</topic>
    <affects>
<package>
<name>p5-YAML-Syck</name>
<range><lt>1.47</lt></range>
</package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>YAML-Syck project reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://metacpan.org/dist/YAML-Syck/changes">
	  <p>YAML-Syck 1.47 fix the following issues:</p>
      <ul>
       <li>CVE-2026-57075 (CWE-125): out-of-bounds read in the base64 decoder
       caused by signed-char indexing of the decode table on !!binary input</li>
       <li>CVE-2026-57076 (CWE-416): use-after-free of an anchor key string
       shared between the node and the anchors table</li>
       <li>CVE-2026-57077 (CWE-125): one-byte out-of-bounds read in the lexer
       newline scan during block-scalar parsing (incomplete-fix follow-on
       to CVE-2025-11683)</li>
       <li>CVE-2026-13713 (CWE-416/CWE-415): use-after-free / double-free of an
       anchor node on anchor redefinition, a remote-crash DoS from a
       7-byte input</li>
      </ul>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-57075</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-57076</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-57077</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2025-11683</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13713</cvename>
      <url>https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/cve-2026-57075</url>
      <url>https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/cve-2026-57076</url>
      <url>https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/cve-2026-57077</url>
      <url>https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/cve-2025-11683</url>
      <url>https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/cve-2026-13713</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-07-16</discovery>
      <entry>2026-09-26</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="023a3d0c-b987-11f1-ad2b-40b034429ecf">
    <topic>p5-Authen-SASL -- Replay attack in Authen::SASL::Perl::DIGEST_MD5</topic>
    <affects>
<package>
<name>p5-Authen-SASL</name>
<range><lt>2.2100</lt></range>
</package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>Authen-SASL project reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://metacpan.org/dist/Authen-SASL/changes">
	   <p>Authen::SASL::Perl::DIGEST_MD5 versions before
	   2.2100 for Perl accept replayed authentication
	   responses via unverified nonce in server_step.
	   server_start generates a fresh nonce and sends it
	   in the challenge, and nothing later compares that
	   value against the nonce the client returns.
	   server_step derives the expected digest from the
	   client's own parameters, so a response verifies
	   whenever its digest matches the nonce it carries.
	   The count table it also checks is keyed on the
	   client-supplied nonce and starts empty in each new
	   server object, so a captured first response,
	   carrying `nc=00000001`, passes that too. RFC 2831
	   defines the nonce in the response as the value the
	   server sent in the preceding challenge. An
	   attacker who observes one successful `qop=auth`
	   exchange can replay the captured response against
	   a later session for the same service, host, realm
	   and user, and authenticate as that user without
	   knowing the password.</p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-86219</cvename>
      <url>https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/cve-2026-86219</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-09-06</discovery>
      <entry>2026-09-26</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="2ec747aa-b97e-11f1-b09d-8447094a420f">
    <topic>Rauthy -- Multiple security vulnerabilities</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
	<name>rauthy</name>
	<range><lt>0.36.2</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>The Rauthy project reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://github.com/sebadob/rauthy/security">
	  <p>WebAuthn authentication code is not bound to the user. (GHSA-x8jp-v2j6-6vjf)</p>
	  <p>Refresh-token grant accepts a caller-supplied client without verifyinG it matches the token's `azp`, allowing cross-client token minting and identity/scope confusion. (https://github.com/sebadob/rauthy/security/advisories/GHSA-7qh2-3hc5-2vqp)</p>
	  <p>Unauthenticated remote panic aborts the whole process on two token endpoints (short refresh_token / device_code). (GHSA-wx92-7mmw-5x82)</p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <url>https://github.com/sebadob/rauthy/security</url>
      <url>https://github.com/sebadob/rauthy/security/advisories/GHSA-x8jp-v2j6-6vjf</url>
      <url>https://github.com/sebadob/rauthy/security/advisories/GHSA-7qh2-3hc5-2vqp</url>
      <url>https://github.com/sebadob/rauthy/security/advisories/GHSA-wx92-7mmw-5x82</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-09-16</discovery>
      <entry>2026-09-26</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="ff969b25-b97b-11f1-b09d-8447094a420f">
    <topic>RusTLS FFI -- plaintext TLS handshake vulnerability</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
	<name>rustls-ffi</name>
	<range><lt>0.15.4</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>The RusTLS project reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://github.com/rustls/rustls-ffi/releases/tag/v0.15.4">
	  <p>TLS 1.3 handshake message processing could allow a broken peer to send plaintext handshake messages where an encrypted one is expected without rustls rejecting the connection</p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <url>https://github.com/rustls/rustls-ffi/releases/tag/v0.15.4</url>
      <url>https://github.com/rustls/rustls/security/advisories/GHSA-2mjx-qc3c-rqvc</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-09-26</discovery>
      <entry>2026-09-26</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="675bc714-b8cd-11f1-ad2b-40b034429ecf">
    <topic>databases/p5-DBI -- multiple vulnerabilities</topic>
    <affects>
<package>
<name>p5-DBI</name>
<range><lt>1.654</lt></range>
</package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>DBI project reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://metacpan.org/dist/DBI/changes">
	  <p>DBI 1.650, 1.651, 1.652, 1.653 and 1.654 fix the following issues:</p>
	  <ul>
	    <li>CVE-2026-88815: Fix DBI::sql_type_cast on IV/NV</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-88816: Fix FetchHashKeyName   on IV/NV</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-78030: Fix arbitrary module and file loading via dbm_type/dbm_mldbm</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-15392: Tighten symlink outside of f_dir</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-73194: Force placeholder limit on :# and :p# too</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-73193: Limit statements to 292 Mb in preparse</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-15043: Fix inverted comparisons for strings in DBI::SQL::Nano</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-15392: Fix DBD::File to ensure that the table is not a symlink outside of f_dir</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-60082: Fix an out-of-bounds error when a statement handle has no fields but the source row is not empty</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-60081: Add an overridable upper bound $MAX_PATH_DEPTH for DBI::ProfileData</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-14739: Set a hard limit of 99999 on '?' placeholders</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-14740: Fix out-of-bounds read in preparse of SQL that starts with a comment</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-14380: Fix code injection via Profile DSN attribute or DBI_PROFILE variable</li>
      </ul>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-15392</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-78030</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-73193</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-73194</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-60081</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-60082</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-15043</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-14380</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-14740</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-14739</cvename>
      <url>https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/cve-2026-15392</url>
      <url>https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/cve-2026-78030</url>
      <url>https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/cve-2026-73193</url>
      <url>https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/cve-2026-73194</url>
      <url>https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/cve-2026-60081</url>
      <url>https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/cve-2026-60082</url>
      <url>https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/cve-2026-15043</url>
      <url>https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/cve-2026-14380</url>
      <url>https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/cve-2026-14740</url>
      <url>https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/cve-2026-14739</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-09-19</discovery>
      <entry>2026-09-25</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="60eb0bba-b668-11f1-9d0e-4c526214c986">
    <topic>Erlang/OTP -- multiple vulnerabilities in ssl, ssh and asn1</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
	<name>erlang</name>
	<range><lt>28.5.0.7,4</lt></range>
      </package>
      <package>
	<name>erlang-runtime27</name>
	<range><lt>27.3.4.18</lt></range>
      </package>
      <package>
	<name>erlang-runtime28</name>
	<range><lt>28.5.0.7</lt></range>
      </package>
      <package>
	<name>erlang-runtime29</name>
	<range><lt>29.1.1</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>The Erlang/OTP project reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://github.com/erlang/otp/security/advisories">
	  <p>OTP 29.1.1, 28.5.0.7 and 27.3.4.18 fix the following
	  issues:</p>
	  <ul>
	    <li>CVE-2026-89422: TLS 1.3 client skips server
	    authentication on unsolicited PSK. A pre_shared_key
	    extension in the ServerHello that the client never offered
	    causes the client to complete the handshake without
	    validating the server's certificate.</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-68956: SSH session channel exhaustion. The
	    max_channels daemon option only limited channels with an
	    active handler, so an authenticated client could open
	    unlimited idle session channels and exhaust the memory of
	    the whole Erlang VM.</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-65634: Superlinear CPU denial-of-service in
	    the asn1 OID decoder via large base-128 arcs.</li>
	  </ul>
	</blockquote>
      </body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-65634</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-68956</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-89422</cvename>
      <url>https://github.com/erlang/otp/security/advisories/GHSA-rgxr-4g4w-j875</url>
      <url>https://github.com/erlang/otp/security/advisories/GHSA-qhcm-px9c-rvfh</url>
      <url>https://github.com/erlang/otp/security/advisories/GHSA-qghx-23m5-r55m</url>
      <url>https://github.com/erlang/otp/releases/tag/OTP-29.1.1</url>
      <url>https://github.com/erlang/otp/releases/tag/OTP-28.5.0.7</url>
      <url>https://github.com/erlang/otp/releases/tag/OTP-27.3.4.18</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-09-22</discovery>
      <entry>2026-09-25</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="bba381b5-b842-11f1-8205-107c614c014e">
    <topic>p5-Image-ExifTool -- code injection via crafted media</topic>
    <affects>
	<package>
	  <name>p5-Image-ExifTool</name>
	  <name>p5-Image-ExifTool-devel</name>
	  <range><lt>13.54</lt></range>
	</package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<blockquote cite="https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-qjrf-c4wp-pgxx">
	  <p>ExifTool versions up to 13.53 contain a code injection flaw in
	  the Process_mrld function of lib/Image/ExifTool/GM.pm, reached
	  while parsing JPEG, QuickTime, MOV and MP4 files.  When exiftool
	  is invoked with the -ee (extract embedded) option on a crafted
	  file, a local attacker with low privileges can inject code that
	  runs in the Perl runtime context of the exiftool process.</p>
	  <p>The issue is fixed in ExifTool 13.54.</p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-7580</cvename>
      <url>https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/cve-2026-7580</url>
      <url>https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-qjrf-c4wp-pgxx</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-05-01</discovery>
      <entry>2026-09-24</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="050e54b4-b81e-11f1-b540-589cfc10a551">
    <topic>podman -- vulnerabilities</topic>
    <affects>
	<package>
	<name>podman</name>
	<range><lt>5.8.7</lt></range>
	</package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>The Podman developers report:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://github.com/podman-container-tools/podman/releases/tag/v5.8.7">
	  <p>This release addresses (CVE-2025-11395), where importing images
	  containing crafted layer tarballs with the podman load command, or
	  importing volumes containing crafted symlinks with podman volume
	  import, allows overwriting files on the host.</p>
	  <p>This release also addresses CVE-2026-79699 and CVE-2026-79705,
	  though we do not believe these CVEs are exploitable through the
	  Podman command line.</p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2025-11395</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-79699</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-79705</cvename>
      <url>https://github.com/podman-container-tools/podman/releases/tag/v5.8.7</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-09-16</discovery>
      <entry>2026-09-24</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="3f11e437-b7cd-11f1-a883-2cf05da270f3">
    <topic>Gitlab -- vulnerabilities</topic>
    <affects>
<package>
	<name>gitlab-ce</name>
	<name>gitlab-ee</name>
	<range><ge>19.4.0</ge><lt>19.4.1</lt></range>
	<range><ge>19.3.0</ge><lt>19.3.3</lt></range>
	<range><ge>13.11.0</ge><lt>19.2.7</lt></range>
</package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>Gitlab reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://docs.gitlab.com/releases/patches/patch-release-gitlab-19-4-1-released/?nav=19.4.1">
	  <p>Double Free issue in Regular Expression Parser impacts GitLab CE/EE</p>
	  <p>Integer Overflow issue in Regular Expression Compiler impacts GitLab CE/EE</p>
	  <p>Cross-site Scripting issue in merge request diff viewer impacts GitLab CE/EE</p>
	  <p>Missing Authorization issue in Duo AI job troubleshooting feature impacts GitLab EE</p>
	  <p>Incorrect Authorization issue in MCP API scope enforcement impacts GitLab CE/EE</p>
	  <p>Use of Less Trusted Source issue in Direct Transfer import user mapping impacts GitLab CE/EE</p>
	  <p>Missing Authorization issue in Epic Issues REST API impacts GitLab CE/EE</p>
	  <p>Incorrect Authorization issue in Duo Workflow Service token governance enforcement impacts GitLab EE</p>
	  <p>Improper Access Control issue in GraphQL memberRoles dependentSecurityPolicies resolver impacts GitLab EE</p>
	  <p>Missing Authorization issue in GraphQL CI job trace API impacts GitLab CE/EE</p>
	  <p>Race Condition issue in MCP gitlab_search tool impacts GitLab CE/EE</p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-89078</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-93577</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-84739</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-92470</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-92874</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-92530</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-8937</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-92529</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-10518</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-4523</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-92628</cvename>
      <url>https://docs.gitlab.com/releases/patches/patch-release-gitlab-19-4-1-released/?nav=19.4.1</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-09-23</discovery>
      <entry>2026-09-24</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="0142953c-b716-11f1-a70f-00a0980083d7">
    <topic>popt -- Out-of-bounds Write</topic>
    <affects>
    <package>
	<name>popt</name>
	<range><le>1.19_2,1</le></range>
    </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:56984 reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:56984">
	  <p>A flaw was found in popt, a command-line option parsing library.
	  An off-by-one error in the poptStuffArgs function, when repeatedly
	  called by a host application or through deep alias nesting, can
	  lead to corruption of internal program data.  This corruption could
	  potentially enable a local attacker to execute arbitrary code if
	  the host application then unsafely processes the altered data.</p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-18739</cvename>
      <url>https://cveawg.mitre.org/api/cve/CVE-2026-18739</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-08-04</discovery>
      <entry>2026-09-23</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="e86be66a-b715-11f1-a70f-00a0980083d7">
    <topic>popt -- Incorrect Calculation of Buffer Size</topic>
    <affects>
    <package>
	<name>popt</name>
	<range><le>1.19_2,1</le></range>
    </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:56984 reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:56984">
	  <p>A flaw was found in popt.  This vulnerability allows an attacker
	  to provide specially crafted configuration content to a host, which,
	  when loaded, can lead to a small memory corruption issue.  This
	  occurs because of an error in how the `poptConfigFileToString`
	  function reallocates memory for buffers.  Successful exploitation
	  could result in heap metadata corruption, potentially causing the
	  affected process to become unavailable (denial of service).</p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-18743</cvename>
      <url>https://cveawg.mitre.org/api/cve/CVE-2026-18743</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-09-01</discovery>
      <entry>2026-09-23</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="6690917c-b657-11f1-ad2b-40b034429ecf">
    <topic>p5-Dancer2 -- Multiple vulnerabilities</topic>
    <affects>
<package>
<name>p5-Dancer2</name>
<range><lt>2.2.0</lt></range>
</package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>Dancer project reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2026/09/22/3">
	  <p>Dancer2 versions before 2.2.0 for Perl do not strip CR and LF
	  from response header names in headers_to_array. The routine removes
	  CR and LF from each header value but not from the name. A name
	  carrying them therefore reaches the PSGI server intact. A server
	  that does not validate keys writes it to the wire, so the bytes
	  after the CRLF arrive as their own header line. The application has
	  to derive the header name from request data, not just the value. An
	  attacker who controls that data adds their own headers and splits
	  the response.</p>
	</blockquote>
	<blockquote cite="http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2026/09/22/1">
	  <p>Dancer2 versions before 2.2.0 for Perl serve a layout as a page when an
	  equivalent spelling of its path misses the guard in the AutoPage handler.
	  The handler compares the request path against the layout directory name as
	  text, while the lookup that follows canonicalises it. A doubled slash, a
	  dot segment, a percent-encoded slash, or a different capitalisation on a
	  case-insensitive filesystem therefore misses the guard. The handler is off
	  by default, enabled with auto_page. The layout wrapping every page is
	  already public, so this discloses one of the application's other layouts.</p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-93709</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-93711</cvename>
      <url>https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/cve-2026-93709</url>
      <url>https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/cve-2026-93711</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-09-22</discovery>
      <entry>2026-09-22</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="5e6fe0cf-b655-11f1-ad2b-40b034429ecf">
    <topic>p5-Dancer2 -- Multiple vulnerabilities</topic>
    <affects>
<package>
<name>p5-Dancer2</name>
<range><ge>2.0.0</ge><lt>2.2.0</lt></range>
</package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>Dancer project reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2026/09/22/2">
	  <p>Dancer2 versions from 2.0.0 before 2.2.0 for Perl dispatch a
	  route that a dying hook refused when the exception handler halts
	  the response in compile_hooks. A hook that dies fires core.app.
	  hook_exception, then calls cleanup unless the failing hook is the
	  exception handler. A handler that halts does not stop that cleanup,
	  which discards the request, response and session the dispatcher has
	  yet to read, so the refused route runs. The handler has to halt the
	  response object by calling its halt method or setting is_halted:
	  the halt keyword unwinds through with_return before cleanup runs.
	  A check in a before hook is not enforced: the caller gets the refusal,
	  while the route body runs and its writes land.</p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-93710</cvename>
      <url>https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/cve-2026-93710</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-09-22</discovery>
      <entry>2026-09-22</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="c1980e14-b424-11f1-bd9f-10ffe07f9334">
    <topic>mailpit -- Multi-frame animation bypass of thumbnail pixel budget</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
	<name>mailpit</name>
	<range><lt>1.31.2</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>Mailpit author reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://github.com/axllent/mailpit/security/advisories/GHSA-2vgv-6hcp-mf43">
	  <p>The fix for CVE-2026-67446 / GHSA-75mr-qw9x-3r39 ("Thumbnail
	  generation decodes unbounded image dimensions before scaling",
	  patched in v1.30.4) bounds only the width × height of a single frame.
	  The decoded-size budget is still not enforced over frame count,
	  so an animated PNG whose per-frame dimensions sit just under the
	  limit still expands to a multiple of it. A remote, unauthenticated
	  client can deliver such an attachment over SMTP and then request
	  one thumbnail to force a multi-gigabyte native allocation.</p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <url>https://github.com/axllent/mailpit/security/advisories/GHSA-2vgv-6hcp-mf43</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-09-19</discovery>
      <entry>2026-09-19</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="6cf2ff4b-b38c-11f1-a655-3497f65b111b">
    <topic>Angie -- worker process memory corruption when using HTTP/3</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
	<name>angie</name>
	<range><lt>1.12.2</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>The Angie Software Team reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://en.angie.software/angie/docs/oss_changes/#angie-1-12-2">
	  <p>When using an OpenSSL version without native HTTP/3 support
	    (3.5.0 or earlier), if the default server for the address that
	    accepted a regular HTTPS request also used HTTP/3 (the listen
	    directive with the quic parameter, possibly on a different port),
	    while a server block without HTTP/3 was selected by domain name
	    (SNI), limited worker process memory corruption or a worker
	    process crash could occur (CVE-2026-90439); the fix was ported
	    from nginx 1.31.6.</p>
	</blockquote>
      </body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-90439</cvename>
      <url>https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-90439</url>
      <url>https://en.angie.software/angie/docs/oss_changes/#angie-1-12-2</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-09-17</discovery>
      <entry>2026-09-18</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="6cf326a2-b38c-11f1-a655-3497f65b111b">
    <topic>angie-module-njs -- multiple vulnerabilities</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
	<name>angie-module-njs</name>
	<range><lt>1.0.1,1</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>The njs development team reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://nginx.org/en/docs/njs/changes.html#njs1.0.1">
	  <p>Access control bypass in js_access when an asynchronous request
	    body continuation threw an exception or produced an unhandled
	    rejection (CVE-2026-18329).  Previously, nginx could continue
	    processing the request as though the js_access check had
	    succeeded.  Affects 0.9.9-1.0.0.</p>
	  <p>Worker process crash when reading Response.statusText after an
	    upstream server returned a status line with an empty reason
	    phrase (CVE-2026-78222).  Affects 0.5.1-1.0.0.</p>
	  <p>Heap buffer overflow while parsing namespace prefix lists
	    passed to xml.exclusiveC14n() (CVE-2026-78689).  Affects
	    0.7.10-1.0.0.</p>
	</blockquote>
      </body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-18329</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-78222</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-78689</cvename>
      <url>https://nginx.org/en/docs/njs/changes.html#njs1.0.1</url>
      <url>https://nginx.org/en/docs/njs/security.html#advisories</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-09-02</discovery>
      <entry>2026-09-18</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="a2fda5d7-b2fb-11f1-9800-641c67a117d8">
    <topic>Vinyl/Varnish -- VCL string methods workspace overflow</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
      <name>vinyl09</name>
      <range><lt>9.0.2</lt></range>
      </package>
      <package>
      <name>varnish7</name>
      <range><ge>6.3.0</ge><le>8.0.2</le></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>Vinyl Development Team reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://vinyl-cache.org/security/VSV00020.html">
	  <p>A workspace buffer overflow vulnerability was found in the .upper()
	  and .lower() string type methods of VCL.</p>
	  <p>This can be used as a remote denial of service (DoS) vector to make
	  the child process segfault or assert, and then restart.</p>
	  <p>Effectively exploiting this vulnerability requires prior knowledge
	  about the VCL in use and the ability to craft a request that contains a
	  string that is long enough to fill the remaining workspace at the call
	  site while staying under the different request size limits
	  (http_req_size, http_req_hdr_len, ..etc).</p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <url>https://vinyl-cache.org/security/VSV00020.html</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-09-16</discovery>
      <entry>2026-09-18</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="3f5c81ae-b227-11f1-a655-3497f65b111b">
    <topic>389-ds-base -- multiple vulnerabilities</topic>
    <affects>
    <package>
	<name>389-ds-base</name>
	<range><lt>3.2.3</lt></range>
    </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>The 389 Directory Server project reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://github.com/389ds/389-ds-base/releases/tag/389-ds-base-3.2.3">
	  <p>CVE-2026-11770: the replication extended operations did not
	    verify that the bind DN is accepted by the replica, and the
	    CleanRUV status filters were open to LDAP injection.</p>
	  <p>CVE-2026-18355: a missing minimum length check in
	    sasl_io_start_packet() lets an authenticated SASL user trigger
	    an unsigned integer underflow, causing heap corruption and a
	    crash of the server.</p>
	  <p>CVE-2026-18453: op_shared_search() does not check for a NULL
	    backend pointer when reusing a paged results slot, so an
	    unauthenticated client can crash ns-slapd with two search
	    requests on one connection. Paged results and anonymous access
	    are enabled by default.</p>
	  <p>CVE-2026-18922: a failed one-shot SASL exchange leaves stale
	    identity data in the auxprop context, so a later successful
	    bind on the same connection can inherit it and escalate to
	    Directory Manager.</p>
	  <p>CVE-2026-19843: the cockpit LDAP editor passed the entry DN
	    into a shell command line, so a user who can create or rename
	    an entry can have the host run commands as root when an
	    administrator opens that entry.</p>
	  <p>CVE-2026-76560: anonymous clients could satisfy SELFDN,
	    USERDNATTR and LDAPURL ACL bind rules, granting unauthorized
	    access.</p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11770</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-18355</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-18453</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-18922</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-19843</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-76560</cvename>
      <url>https://github.com/389ds/389-ds-base/releases/tag/389-ds-base-3.2.3</url>
      <url>https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-11770</url>
      <url>https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-18355</url>
      <url>https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-18453</url>
      <url>https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-18922</url>
      <url>https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-19843</url>
      <url>https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-76560</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-09-07</discovery>
      <entry>2026-09-17</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="0627020f-b21c-11f1-bc39-5404a68ad561">
    <topic>traefik -- Multiple vulnerabilities</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
      <name>traefik</name>
      <range><lt>3.7.13</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
      <p>The traefik project releases a new version addressing multiple vulnerabilities:</p>
      <blockquote cite="https://github.com/traefik/traefik/releases/tag/v3.7.13">
      <ul>
      <li>GHSA-qqjf-53cj-pwvv (HTTP/3 Backend NTLM Connection Reuse)</li>
      <li>GHSA-f52w-8j3h-j724 (bypassing path-scoped routing)</li>
      <li>GHSA-v67p-phpq-fc8x (entrypoint header-name sanitization bypass)</li>
      <li>GHSA-w4v4-9rw7-5326 (HTTP Request/Response Smuggling)</li>
      <li>GHSA-8fcf-v89g-xpg6 (unauthenticated username-enumeration timing oracle)</li>
      </ul>
      </blockquote>
      </body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <url>https://github.com/traefik/traefik/releases/tag/v3.7.13</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-09-04</discovery>
      <entry>2026-09-16</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="a738c927-b216-11f1-bc39-5404a68ad561">
    <topic>mkvtoolnix -- Heap Buffer Overflow via avilib ODML Superindex Integer Wraparound</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
      <name>mkvtoolnix</name>
      <range><lt>102.0</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
      <p>Moritz Bunkus reports:</p>
      <blockquote cite="https://mkvtoolnix.download/doc/ChangeLog">
       <p>potential heap overflows/invalid memory access in the ODML index handling due to
       unsiged integer multiplication wrapping around (colloquially known as "overflowing")
       with specifically crafted AVI files. Affects only mkvmerge as the other tools do
       not read AVIs</p>
      </blockquote>
      </body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-90783</cvename>
      <url>https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-90783</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-08-25</discovery>
      <entry>2026-09-16</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="3f4d285d-b1f6-11f1-8f5e-3c7c3fba4204">
    <topic>Unbound -- multiple vulnerabilities</topic>
    <affects>
	<package>
	  <name>unbound</name>
	  <range><lt>1.26.1</lt></range>
	</package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>NLnet Labs reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://community.nlnetlabs.nl/t/unbound-1-26-1-released/3463">
	  <p>This release consolidates security fixes for issues reported over
	  a period of time. There are fixes for:</p>
	  <ul>
	  <li>CVE-2026-81642: Heap buffer overflow and possible Remote Code
	  Execution when digesting DNSKEY.</li>
	  <li>CVE-2026-81634: Possible heap buffer overflow during DNSSEC
	  canonicalization.</li>
	  <li>CVE-2026-82717: CNAME synthesis could lead to heap corruption.</li>
	  <li>CVE-2026-77955: Possible ZONEMD verification bypass window.</li>
	  <li>CVE-2026-78227: Use-after-free in DoQ stream output buffer on
	  reset re-transmission.</li>
	  <li>CVE-2026-80225: Possible degradation of service from continuous
	  queries on the same TCP/DoT connection.</li>
	  <li>CVE-2026-82720: Use-after-free in DoH stream cleanup code path.</li>
	  <li>CVE-2026-85501: Retrap: Novel Vulnerabilities to launch
	  Algorithmic Complexity Attacks on DNSSEC.</li>
	  <li>CVE-2026-77860: ‘serve-expired’ can bypass Unbound ‘wait-limit’.</li>
	  </ul>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-81642</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-81634</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-82717</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-77955</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-78227</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-80225</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-82720</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-85501</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-77860</cvename>
      <url>https://community.nlnetlabs.nl/t/unbound-1-26-1-released/3463</url>
      <url>https://github.com/NLnetLabs/unbound/releases/tag/release-1.26.1</url>
      <url>https://www.nlnetlabs.nl/projects/unbound/security-advisories/</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-09-15</discovery>
      <entry>2026-09-16</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="7dc8fd4b-b1a7-11f1-a655-3497f65b111b">
    <topic>nginx -- buffer overflow when using ngx_http_v3_module</topic>
    <affects>
    <package>
	<name>nginx</name>
	<range><lt>1.30.5,3</lt></range>
    </package>
    <package>
	<name>nginx-devel</name>
	<range><lt>1.31.6</lt></range>
    </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>The nginx development team reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://nginx.org/en/security_advisories.html">
	  <p>Buffer overflow when using ngx_http_v3_module
	    (CVE-2026-90439). Severity: medium.</p>
	  <p>A heap memory buffer overflow might occur in a worker
	    process under certain configurations when using HTTP/3 with
	    OpenSSL 3.5.0 and earlier.</p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-90439</cvename>
      <url>https://my.f5.com/manage/s/article/K000162604</url>
      <url>https://nginx.org/en/security_advisories.html</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-09-15</discovery>
      <entry>2026-09-16</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="ce54d883-b060-11f1-b187-901b0edee044">
    <topic>anki -- multiple vulnerabilities</topic>
    <affects>
    <package>
      <name>anki</name>
      <range><lt>26.9</lt></range>
    </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>Abdo Hasani reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://github.com/ankitects/anki/security/advisories/GHSA-jw6j-j4mf-8jgm">
	  <p>Imported note HTML may execute inside an embedded image-occlusion
	document that retains the editor profile's desktop API credentials. This could
	cross the boundary between untrusted note content and privileged desktop
	operations.</p>
	</blockquote>
	<blockquote cite="https://github.com/ankitects/anki/security/advisories/GHSA-932p-crhj-v43p">
	  <p>An improper path validation vulnerability allows an attacker to
	execute arbitrary code on a victim's system when they interact with a malicious
	flashcard deck. This vulnerability is triggered when a user right-clicks an
	image within the editor and selects the "Open image" action; if an embedded
	"&lt;img&gt;" tag contains a path with a dangerous extension in its src attribute,
	the operating system may execute the file.</p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <url>https://github.com/ankitects/anki/security/advisories/GHSA-jw6j-j4mf-8jgm</url>
      <url>https://github.com/ankitects/anki/security/advisories/GHSA-932p-crhj-v43p</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-09-14</discovery>
      <entry>2026-09-14</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="3a38fdda-b05a-11f1-9369-b42e991fc52e">
    <topic>cjose -- Use of Hard-coded Cryptographic Key</topic>
    <affects>
    <package>
	<name>cjose</name>
	<range><lt>0.6.2.6</lt></range>
    </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>https://github.com/OpenIDC/cjose/security/advisories/GHSA-f6wf-pqg3-6wqq reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://github.com/OpenIDC/cjose/security/advisories/GHSA-f6wf-pqg3-6wqq">
	<p>
	OpenIDC/cjose is a C library implementing the Javascript
	Object Signing and Encryption (JOSE). In versions 0.6.1
	through 0.6.2.5, when cjose encrypts a JWE using an
	AES-CBC-HMAC content-encryption algorithm (`A128CBC-HS256`,
	`A192CBC-HS384`, or `A256CBC-HS512`) together with any
	key-management algorithm that generates a fresh
	content-encryption key (CEK), the CEK is all zero bytes
	instead of being randomly generated. The resulting JWE is
	therefore encrypted and authenticated under a fixed,
	publicly known key, so anyone who obtains the JWE can
	recover the plaintext and forge or modify the content. This
	is fixed in version 0.6.2.6 by
	`_cjose_jwe_set_cek_aes_cbc()` generating the CEK from
	`RAND_bytes`. A regression test asserts that the
	`encrypted_key` differs across two encryptions for each
	AES-CBC-HMAC variant. Until upgrading, for data encrypted
	with cjose, three options are available. Use an AES-GCM
	`enc` (`A128GCM` / `A192GCM` / `A256GCM`) instead of an
	AES-CBC-HMAC `enc`, use `alg=dir` with a caller-supplied
	CEK, or avoid using cjose for JWE encryption with the
	affected algorithm pair. These are mitigations for new
	ciphertexts only; data already encrypted under the zero key
	remains compromised and should be
	re-encrypted (and any secrets it contained rotated).
	</p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-53939</cvename>
      <url>https://cveawg.mitre.org/api/cve/CVE-2026-53939</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-09-08</discovery>
      <entry>2026-09-14</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="35b3a492-b05a-11f1-9369-b42e991fc52e">
    <topic>cjose -- Heap-based Buffer Overflow</topic>
    <affects>
    <package>
	<name>cjose</name>
	<range><lt>0.6.2.5</lt></range>
    </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>https://github.com/OpenIDC/cjose/security/advisories/GHSA-75r7-f5cv-g3wj reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://github.com/OpenIDC/cjose/security/advisories/GHSA-75r7-f5cv-g3wj">
	<p>
	  OpenIDC/cjose is a C library implementing the Javascript
	  Object Signing and Encryption (JOSE). Prior to version
	  0.6.2.5, cjose's JWE decryption path for the AES Key Wrap
	  key-management algorithms (`alg` = `A128KW`, `A192KW`,
	  `A256KW`) does not validate the length of the
	  attacker-supplied `encrypted_key` (JWE Encrypted Key)
	  before unwrapping it into a fixed-size, heap-allocated
	  Content Encryption Key (CEK) buffer. A remote,
	  unauthenticated attacker who can submit a crafted JWE to
	  an application that decrypts it with an AES-KW symmetric
	  key can trigger an out-of-bounds heap write, corrupting
	  the heap. This leads at minimum to a crash (denial of
	  service) and, depending on the heap layout and allocator,
	  may be leverageable for further memory-corruption impact.
	  `cjose_jwe_import()` / `cjose_jwe_decrypt()` are
	  pre-authentication entry points: they parse and process
	  fully attacker-controlled input. Upgrade to cjose 0.6.2.5
	  to receive a patch. If upgrading is not immediately
	  possible, reject the AES Key Wrap algorithms
	  (`A128KW`/`A192KW`/`A256KW`) for untrusted JWEs at the
	  application layer.
	</p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-53938</cvename>
      <url>https://cveawg.mitre.org/api/cve/CVE-2026-53938</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-09-08</discovery>
      <entry>2026-09-14</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="fac18f5f-afc2-11f1-8266-3c7c3fba4204">
    <topic>Gitea -- multiple vulnerabilities</topic>
    <affects>
	<package>
	  <name>gitea</name>
	  <range><lt>1.27.3</lt></range>
	</package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>Gitea reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://blog.gitea.com/release-of-1.27.3/">
	<p>This release contains fixes for 26 security issues,
	hardens issue searching that an unfiltered query no longer
	enumerates every public repository into the indexer filter
	and removes unsafe code from the internal private endpoints.
	Please upgrade as soon as possible.
	</p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-66877</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-71184</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-68957</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-60010</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-70406</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-63792</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-66874</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-68964</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-67577</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-66849</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-73135</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-78433</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-70407</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-73126</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-70400</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-70396</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-63021</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-62925</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-73273</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-60021</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-60018</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-73130</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-70402</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-66853</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-71301</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-73504</cvename>
      <url>https://blog.gitea.com/release-of-1.27.3/</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-08-29</discovery>
      <entry>2026-09-13</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="e627950e-ad4f-11f1-8656-000af7b98cf6">
    <topic>strongSwan -- multiple vulnerabilities</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
       <name>strongswan</name>
       <range><lt>6.1.0</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
       <p>The strongSwan project reports:</p>
       <blockquote cite="https://www.strongswan.org/blog/2026/09/07/strongswan-6.1.0-released.html">
       <p>strongSwan 6.1.0 fixes eleven vulnerabilities:</p>
       <ul>
       <li>CVE-2026-78123: A flaw in the openssl plugin in the
       processing of PKCS#7 containers can result in a crash.
       Affects 5.0.2 and newer.</li>
       <li>CVE-2026-78124: A flaw in the openssl plugin in the
       enumeration of certificates in PKCS#7 containers can result
       in memory leaks.  Affects 5.0.2 and newer.</li>
       <li>CVE-2026-78126: A flaw in the eap-aka plugin in the
       processing of an unexpected AKA-Synchronization-Failure can
       result in a crash.  Affects 4.1.10 and newer.</li>
       <li>CVE-2026-78127: A flaw in libcharon in the logging of IKE
       messages can result in a denial of service via memory
       exhaustion.  Affects 4.1.2 and newer.</li>
       <li>CVE-2026-78129: A flaw in libstrongswan in the processing
       of encrypted PKCS#7 containers can result in a denial of
       service.  Affects 4.6.2 and newer.</li>
       <li>CVE-2026-78130: A flaw in the x509 plugin in the
       verification of X.509 attribute certificates can lead to a
       denial of service.  Affects 4.2.0 and newer.</li>
       <li>CVE-2026-78131: A flaw in the x509 plugin in the parsing
       of identities in X.509 attribute certificates can lead to a
       denial of service via memory exhaustion.  Affects 4.2.0 and
       newer.</li>
       <li>CVE-2026-78132: A flaw in the x509 plugin in the parsing
       of the ietfAttrSyntax ASN.1 type in X.509 attribute
       certificates can lead to a denial of service.  Affects 5.1.3
       and newer.</li>
       <li>CVE-2026-78133: A flaw in libcharon in the handling of
       IKEv2 rekeying collisions can result in a use-after-free and
       potentially remote code execution.  Affects 6.0.0 and
       newer.</li>
       <li>CVE-2026-78134: A flaw in the eap-peap and eap-ttls
       plugins in the propagation of authentication details from
       inner EAP methods can result in incorrect identity binding
       and potential authorization bypass.  Affects 4.5.0 and
       newer.</li>
       <li>CVE-2026-78135: A flaw in libcharon in the handling of
       CREATE_CHILD_SA requests on unestablished IKE SAs can result
       in the creation of a usable Child SA before authentication
       completes.  Affects 5.9.7 and newer.</li>
       </ul>
       </blockquote>
     </body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-78123</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-78124</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-78126</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-78127</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-78129</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-78130</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-78131</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-78132</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-78133</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-78134</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-78135</cvename>
      <url>https://www.strongswan.org/blog/2026/09/07/strongswan-6.1.0-released.html</url>
      <url>https://github.com/strongswan/strongswan/releases/tag/6.1.0</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-09-07</discovery>
      <entry>2026-09-10</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="b7ae786a-af80-11f1-9800-641c67a117d8">
    <topic>znc -- multiple vulnerabilities</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
	<name>znc</name>
	<range><lt>1.10.3</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>ZNC reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://wiki.znc.in/ChangeLog/1.10.3">
	  <p>CVE-2026-82373: Use-after-free when unloading modules,
	    triggered by unprivileged users.  To mitigate, set DenyLoadMod
	    to true.</p>
	  <p>CVE-2026-82374: Null pointer dereference in crypt module,
	    triggered by IRC server.</p>
	  <p>CVE-2020-11022, CVE-2020-11023: Updated the old bundled
	    vulnerable version of jQuery to 3.5.1.</p>
	</blockquote>
      </body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2020-11022</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2020-11023</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-82373</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-82374</cvename>
      <url>https://wiki.znc.in/ChangeLog/1.10.3</url>
      <url>https://github.com/znc/znc/releases/tag/znc-1.10.3</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-09-13</discovery>
      <entry>2026-09-13</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="7fd351d1-af26-11f1-a883-2cf05da270f3">
    <topic>Gitlab -- vulnerabilities</topic>
    <affects>
<package>
	<name>gitlab-ce</name>
	<name>gitlab-ee</name>
	<range><ge>19.3.0</ge><lt>19.3.2</lt></range>
	<range><ge>19.2.0</ge><lt>19.2.6</lt></range>
	<range><ge>10.1.0</ge><lt>19.1.8</lt></range>
</package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>Gitlab reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://docs.gitlab.com/releases/patches/patch-release-gitlab-19-3-2-released/?nav=19.3.2">
	  <p>Path Traversal issue in repository commits API impacts GitLab CE/EE</p>
	  <p>Insecure Deserialization issue in GraphQL subscription serializer impacts GitLab EE</p>
	  <p>Buffer Overflow issue in Unicode conversion wrapper impacts GitLab EE</p>
	  <p>Scheduled Pipeline Execution Policy test allows Developers to access protected CI/CD variables</p>
	  <p>Cross-site Scripting issue in Markdown JSON table renderer impacts GitLab CE/EE</p>
	  <p>Incorrect Authorization issue in CI/CD environment variable scope matcher impacts GitLab CE/EE</p>
	  <p>Denial of Service issue in GraphQL complexity limiter impacts GitLab CE/EE</p>
	  <p>Denial of Service issue in GraphQL complexity limiter impacts GitLab CE/EE</p>
	  <p>Race Condition issue in Merge Request Pipelines impacts GitLab CE/EE</p>
	  <p>Improper Authentication issue in SAML SSO sign-in restriction enforcement impacts GitLab CE/EE</p>
	  <p>Insufficiently Protected Credentials issue in Workhorse senddata emitters impacts GitLab CE/EE</p>
	  <p>Cross-site Scripting issue in Content Editor impacts GitLab CE/EE</p>
	  <p>Access Control Implementation issue in protected environment approval rules impacts GitLab EE</p>
	  <p>Authorization Bypass issue in protected environment approval rules impacts GitLab EE</p>
	  <p>Missing Authorization issue in Generic Package Registry impacts GitLab CE/EE</p>
	  <p>Improper Input Validation issue in Namespace Transfer impacts GitLab CE/EE</p>
	  <p>Missing Authorization issue in Compliance Framework management impacts GitLab EE</p>
	  <p>Improper Input Validation issue in Terraform State API impacts GitLab CE/EE</p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-85706</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-87719</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-88765</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-79708</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-78252</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13210</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2025-14871</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-1168</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2024-11222</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-12910</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-82837</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-19619</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-86341</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-86340</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-7514</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-8030</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-16794</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-3855</cvename>
      <url>https://docs.gitlab.com/releases/patches/patch-release-gitlab-19-3-2-released/?nav=19.3.2</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-09-10</discovery>
      <entry>2026-09-13</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="cd5bfb7d-ac34-11f1-9b94-901b0e13f1a0">
    <topic>yt-dlp: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements</topic>
    <affects>
    <package>
	<name>yt-dlp</name>
	<range><lt>2026.07.04</lt></range>
    </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>https://github.com/yt-dlp/yt-dlp/security/advisories/GHSA-6v4j-43gg-vj32 reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://github.com/yt-dlp/yt-dlp/security/advisories/GHSA-6v4j-43gg-vj32">
	<p>yt-dlp and youtube-dl are command-line audio/video downloaders.
	Prior to 2026.7.4, the --write-link, --write-url-link, and
	--write-desktop-link options can write .url or .desktop shortcut
	files using attacker-controlled webpage_url or filename metadata
	without sufficient validation or escaping, allowing malicious
	file:// URI injection on Windows or newline-based desktop
	entry key injection on Linux that can execute commands if
	the generated shortcut is
	opened. This issue is fixed in version 2026.7.4.
	</p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-55404</cvename>
      <url>https://cveawg.mitre.org/api/cve/CVE-2026-55404</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-07-08</discovery>
      <entry>2026-09-09</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="fcc6917b-adbc-11f1-a655-3497f65b111b">
    <topic>immich -- locked assets remain accessible through shared albums and links</topic>
    <affects>
	<package>
	  <name>immich</name>
	  <range><le>3.2.2</le></range>
	</package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>VulnCheck reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-82272">
	  <p>Immich through 3.1.0 fails to properly enforce locked asset
	    visibility when assets are locked through the single-asset
	    endpoint, allowing them to remain accessible through shared
	    albums and links.</p>
	</blockquote>
	<p>In 3.2.2 the single-asset endpoint still lacks the album removal
	  that the bulk endpoint performs, and the album and shared link
	  access checks still carry no visibility filter.  Both code paths
	  of the web interface use the bulk endpoint, so the state can only
	  be reached by calling the API directly, and such assets stay
	  visible only to those the owner already shares the album or the
	  link with.  The identifier was assigned by VulnCheck, not by the
	  immich project, which has published no advisory and has not
	  confirmed the report.  NVD has not analysed the entry.</p>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-82272</cvename>
      <url>https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-82272</url>
      <url>https://github.com/immich-app/immich/issues/29526</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-08-28</discovery>
      <entry>2026-09-11</entry>
      <modified>2026-09-16</modified>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="fcc6baaa-adbc-11f1-a655-3497f65b111b">
    <topic>immich -- open redirect and reflected XSS in maintenance endpoint</topic>
    <affects>
	<package>
	  <name>immich</name>
	  <range><lt>3.2.0</lt></range>
	</package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>The immich project reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://github.com/immich-app/immich/security/advisories/GHSA-h5w4-vjv4-9r5q">
	  <p>The /maintenance endpoint fails to validate the continue URL
	    parameter.  When maintenance mode is disabled, which is the
	    default, the application accepts unvalidated redirect targets,
	    enabling both open redirects and reflected cross-site scripting.
	    An unauthenticated user can craft a malicious link leading to
	    account takeover, including administrative accounts, through
	    same-origin API requests with credentials.</p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <url>https://github.com/immich-app/immich/security/advisories/GHSA-h5w4-vjv4-9r5q</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-08-23</discovery>
      <entry>2026-09-11</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="5d69ee28-adb9-11f1-9d0e-4c526214c986">
    <topic>redpanda-connect -- memory exhaustion via oversized AMQP frames</topic>
    <affects>
	<package>
	  <name>redpanda-connect</name>
	  <range><lt>4.109.0</lt></range>
	</package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>amqp091-go developers report:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://github.com/rabbitmq/amqp091-go/security/advisories/GHSA-6c5v-hqjr-5xxp">
	  <p>Before version 1.13.0, a compromised or malicious AMQP broker
	    can force the client to allocate resources for and process
	    content body frames that exceed the negotiated frame_max limit.
	    This can lead to unexpected memory consumption or
	    application-layer denial of service (DoS), bypassing the
	    protocol's built-in framing constraints.</p>
	</blockquote>
	<p>Redpanda Connect vendored an affected amqp091-go release
	  up to version 4.108.0; 4.109.0 bumps it to 1.14.0.</p>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-79921</cvename>
      <url>https://github.com/rabbitmq/amqp091-go/security/advisories/GHSA-6c5v-hqjr-5xxp</url>
      <url>https://github.com/redpanda-data/connect/pull/4795</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-08-26</discovery>
      <entry>2026-09-11</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="9736fef3-ada6-11f1-a655-3497f65b111b">
    <topic>FreeIPA -- multiple vulnerabilities</topic>
    <affects>
	<package>
	  <name>freeipa-server</name>
	  <range><lt>4.13.4</lt></range>
	</package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>The FreeIPA project reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://www.freeipa.org/release-notes/4-13-4.html">
	  <ul>
	    <li>CVE-2026-76578: the access control instruction for self-managed
	      OTP tokens requires no authentication and does not restrict which
	      attributes may be written alongside the token entry. An
	      unauthenticated LDAP client can create a Kerberos principal and
	      add it to the administrators group.</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-79678: insufficiently validated --organization and
	      --base-url input to idp-add reaches a constrained eval() before
	      the LDAP access control check is enforced, allowing any
	      authenticated principal to enumerate server environment variables
	      and to exhaust memory.</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-11861: where a cross-realm trust with Active Directory
	      is configured, Active Directory users can bypass authentication
	      for FreeIPA services including the Web UI, the SMB server and the
	      LDAP directory.</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-13097: the uniqueness constraint on Kerberos principal
	      name attributes does not account for equivalent representations of
	      the same name, so a user with LDAP write privileges can create a
	      service principal that impersonates a privileged one.</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-19550: trust-fetch-domains is gated by a read-only
	      permission on the trust object rather than a trust administration
	      permission, letting any authenticated user trigger a privileged
	      trust refresh against an attacker-supplied server.</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-73196: an oversized OTP key value is decoded and
	      re-encoded without a size limit, consuming excessive CPU and
	      memory.</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-73197: the migration endpoint reads oversized POST
	      bodies fully into memory, which an unauthenticated client can
	      abuse for denial of service.</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-73198: the i18n_messages endpoint accepts arbitrarily
	      large request bodies, which an unauthenticated client can abuse
	      for memory exhaustion.</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-73199: a null pointer dereference in the ipa-enrollment
	      SLAPI plugin crashes the directory server when a malformed LDAP
	      extended operation omits a required request value.</li>
	  </ul>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11861</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13097</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-19550</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-73196</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-73197</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-73198</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-73199</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-76578</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-79678</cvename>
      <url>https://www.freeipa.org/release-notes/4-13-3.html</url>
      <url>https://www.freeipa.org/release-notes/4-13-4.html</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-08-19</discovery>
      <entry>2026-09-11</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="6a6ddb1d-ac6b-11f1-982d-3c7c3fba4204">
    <topic>CrowdSec -- multiple vulnerabilities</topic>
    <affects>
	<package>
	  <name>crowdsec</name>
	  <range><lt>1.8.0</lt></range>
	</package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>The CrowdSec Team reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://github.com/crowdsecurity/crowdsec/releases/tag/v1.8.0">
	  <ul>
	    <li><a href="https://github.com/crowdsecurity/crowdsec/security/advisories/GHSA-g2x2-jgfg-pg7g">[GHSA-g2x2-jgfg-pg7g]</a>: HTTP acquisition datasource lacks a decompressed body cap and trusts Content-Length.</li>
	    <li><a href="https://github.com/crowdsecurity/crowdsec/security/advisories/GHSA-rh69-4vqj-9gj8">[GHSA-rh69-4vqj-9gj8]</a>: Unbounded request-body read in kubernetes-audit acquisition webhook.</li>
	  </ul>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <url>https://github.com/crowdsecurity/crowdsec/security/advisories/GHSA-g2x2-jgfg-pg7g</url>
      <url>https://github.com/crowdsecurity/crowdsec/security/advisories/GHSA-rh69-4vqj-9gj8</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-08-31</discovery>
      <entry>2026-09-09</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="e7726f5e-a9d0-11f1-93c7-8447094a420f">
    <topic>Roundcube -- Multiple vulnerabilities</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
	<name>roundcube-php82</name>
	<name>roundcube-php83</name>
	<name>roundcube-php84</name>
	<name>roundcube-php85</name>
	<name>roundcube-php85</name>
	<range><lt>1.7.3,1</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>The Roundcube project reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://roundcube.net/news/2026/09/06/security-updates-1.6.19-and-1.7.4">
	  <ul>
	    <li>CSS declaration smuggling via un-encoded ampersand emission</li>
	    <li>CSS property injection via body background attribute</li>
	    <li>email header injection via bare CR in the subject field</li>
	    <li>email header injection via C-escape \r in the recipient display name</li>
	    <li>email header injection via identity’s organization field</li>
	    <li>zero-click stored XSS via TNEF MIME tag injection in the attachment URL</li>
	    <li>XSS in the HTML editor using text/enriched part content</li>
	    <li>cross-user access in contact group membership (add/remove) in the SQL address book</li>
	    <li>is_local_url() bypass via trailing-dot FQDN in stylesheet URL</li>
	    <li>remote content blocking bypass via CSS escapes in FuncIRI attributes</li>
	    <li>remote-content blocker bypass via SVG SMIL src animation</li>
	    <li>SSRF bypass in Roundcube CSS proxy via hexadecimal IPv6-mapped IPv4 addresses</li>
	  </ul>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <url>https://roundcube.net/news/2026/09/06/security-updates-1.6.19-and-1.7.4</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-09-06</discovery>
      <entry>2026-09-06</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="25012057-a886-11f1-a836-b42e991fc52e">
    <topic>OpenVPN: denial of service</topic>
    <affects>
    <package>
	<name>openvpn</name>
	<range><lt>2.7.7</lt></range>
    </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>OpenVPN team reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://community.openvpn.net/Security%20Announcements/CVE-2026-84732/source">
	<p>
	  OpenVPN 2.x allows attackers to potentially cause a denial
	  of service against the control channel reliability layer,
	  either by driving the reliable TLS retransmission timeout
	  to grow without bound, or by sending acknowledgements for
	  packets that cannot be outstanding.
	</p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-84732</cvename>
      <url>https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-84732</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-09-04</discovery>
      <entry>2026-09-04</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="0bfb082c-a7b6-11f1-a655-3497f65b111b">
    <topic>njs -- heap buffer overflow in XML exclusive canonicalization</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
	<name>njs</name>
	<name>libnjs</name>
	<name>nginx-module-njs</name>
	<range><lt>1.0.1</lt></range>
      </package>
      <package>
	<name>nginx-full</name>
	<range><lt>1.30.4_7,3</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>F5 reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://my.f5.com/manage/s/article/K000162602">
	  <p>A flaw in the NGINX JavaScript XML module allows an
	    out-of-bounds write when xml.exclusiveC14n() processes a
	    crafted XML namespace prefix list.  This may lead to worker
	    process crashes, heap corruption or memory disclosure.  The
	    NGINX SAML reference implementation is affected because it
	    processes SAML data before signature verification.</p>
	</blockquote>
      </body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-78689</cvename>
      <url>https://my.f5.com/manage/s/article/K000162602</url>
      <url>https://nginx.org/en/docs/njs/changes.html</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-09-02</discovery>
      <entry>2026-09-03</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="271556c1-ddbf-4d44-95e6-a731841539b2">
    <topic>electron42 -- multiple vulnerabilities</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
	<name>electron42</name>
	<range><lt>42.11.1</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>Electron developers report:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://github.com/electron/electron/releases/tag/v42.11.1">
	  <p>This update fixes the following vulnerabilities: CVE-2026-15764, CVE-2026-15765,
	    CVE-2026-15766, CVE-2026-15767, CVE-2026-15768, CVE-2026-15769, CVE-2026-15770,
	    CVE-2026-15771, CVE-2026-15772, CVE-2026-15773, CVE-2026-15774, CVE-2026-15775,
	    CVE-2026-15776, CVE-2026-15777, and CVE-2026-15778.
	  </p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-15764</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-15765</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-15766</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-15767</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-15768</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-15769</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-15770</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-15771</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-15772</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-15773</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-15774</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-15775</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-15776</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-15777</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-15778</cvename>
      <url>https://github.com/electron/electron/pull/53344</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-09-01</discovery>
      <entry>2026-09-03</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="102bc631-a6da-11f1-ba21-00e0edd85c6a">
    <topic>jenkins -- multiple vulnerabilities</topic>
    <affects>
    <package>
	<name>jenkins</name>
	<range><lt>2.580</lt></range>
    </package>
    <package>
	<name>jenkins-lts</name>
	<range><lt>2.568.3</lt></range>
    </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>Jenkins Security Advisory 2026-09-02:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://www.jenkins.io/security/advisory/2026-09-02/">
	  <ul>
	    <li>(High) SECURITY-3972 / CVE-2026-84645: Deserialization
	    vulnerability</li>
	    <li>(Medium) SECURITY-3908 / CVE-2026-84646: Lack of type
	    restriction in deserialization</li>
	    <li>(High) SECURITY-3915 / CVE-2026-84647: Instantiation of any
	    types related to configuration</li>
	    <li>(High) SECURITY-3967 / CVE-2026-84648: Stored XSS
	    vulnerability in system log viewer</li>
	    <li>(High) SECURITY-3878 / CVE-2026-84649: Cross-origin exposure
	    of CSRF token</li>
	    <li>(High) SECURITY-4032 / CVE-2026-84650: Unsafe deserialization
	    allows overwriting configuration</li>
	    <li>(Medium) SECURITY-4025 / CVE-2026-84651: Unsafe
	    deserialization allows overwriting other agents</li>
	    <li>(High) SECURITY-4016 / CVE-2026-84652: Session fixation
	    vulnerability</li>
	    <li>(Medium) SECURITY-3981 / CVE-2026-84653: Incorrect permission
	    check in Appearance configuration page</li>
	    <li>(Medium) SECURITY-3926 / CVE-2026-84654: Form submission data
	    binding can set static fields</li>
	    <li>(Medium) SECURITY-3879 / CVE-2026-84655: Injection
	    vulnerability in REST API</li>
	    <li>(Medium) SECURITY-4006 / CVE-2026-84656: Missing permission
	    check allows reading build parameters</li>
	    <li>(Medium) SECURITY-4015 / CVE-2026-84657: Missing permission
	    check allows canceling builds</li>
	  </ul>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-84645</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-84646</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-84647</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-84648</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-84649</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-84650</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-84651</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-84652</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-84653</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-84654</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-84655</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-84656</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-84657</cvename>
      <url>https://www.jenkins.io/security/advisory/2026-09-02/</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-09-02</discovery>
      <entry>2026-09-02</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="1ee62c05-a646-11f1-b187-901b0edee044">
    <topic>py-strawberry-graphql -- Incorrect authorization</topic>
    <affects>
    <package>
      <name>py310-strawberry-graphql</name>
      <name>py311-strawberry-graphql</name>
      <name>py312-strawberry-graphql</name>
      <name>py313-strawberry-graphql</name>
      <name>py313t-strawberry-graphql</name>
      <name>py314-strawberry-graphql</name>
      <name>py314t-strawberry-graphql</name>
      <name>py315-strawberry-graphql</name>
      <range><lt>0.326.1</lt></range>
    </package>
    <package>
      <name>py312-dj60-strawberry-graphql</name>
      <name>py313-dj60-strawberry-graphql</name>
      <name>py313t-dj60-strawberry-graphql</name>
      <name>py314-dj60-strawberry-graphql</name>
      <name>py314t-dj60-strawberry-graphql</name>
      <name>py315-dj60-strawberry-graphql</name>
      <range><lt>0.326.1</lt></range>
    </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>Patrick Arminio reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://github.com/strawberry-graphql/strawberry/security/advisories/GHSA-pfvf-fwfp-25mp">
	<p>"PermissionExtension.resolve()" evaluates the return value of
	"has_permission()" for truthiness on the synchronous path. "supports_sync" only
	classifies a permission as asynchronous when "has_permission" is declared with
	"async def" (via "inspect.iscoroutinefunction"), so a plain "def" that returns
	an awaitable is treated as synchronous. An awaitable is always truthy, so the
	check passes even when it resolves to "False" and the protected resolver runs.

	The resolve path is chosen by the field resolver, not by the execution method,
	so any field with a synchronous resolver is affected under both
	"execute_sync()" and "execute()". Permissions declared with "async def
	has_permission()", or a plain "def" returning a boolean, are not affected.</p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <url>https://github.com/strawberry-graphql/strawberry/security/advisories/GHSA-pfvf-fwfp-25mp</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-09-01</discovery>
      <entry>2026-09-02</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="19d0eaf5-a698-11f1-bf98-a8a1599412c6">
    <topic>chromium -- security fixes</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
       <name>chromium</name>
       <range><lt>152.0.7977.75</lt></range>
      </package>
      <package>
       <name>ungoogled-chromium</name>
       <range><lt>152.0.7977.75</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
       <p>Chrome Releases reports:</p>
       <blockquote cite="https://chromereleases.googleblog.com/2026/09/stable-channel-update-for-desktop.html">
	 <p>This update includes 26 security fixes:</p>
	 <ul>
	    <li>[522307103] Critical CVE-2026-84353: Use after free in Shared Tab Groups.</li>
	    <li>[546260492] Critical CVE-2026-84352: Use after free in WebGL.</li>
	    <li>[498839176] High CVE-2026-84354: Incorrect authorization in FileSystem.</li>
	    <li>[514078656] High CVE-2026-84359: Information leak in Skia.</li>
	    <li>[523208474] High CVE-2026-84357: Improper input validation in Omnibox.</li>
	    <li>[533534913] High CVE-2026-84324: Use after free in Proxy.</li>
	    <li>[537105664] High CVE-2026-84349: Use after free in Browser.</li>
	    <li>[547936520] High CVE-2026-84326: Uninitialized resource in V8.</li>
	    <li>[549311485] High CVE-2026-84333: Use after free in Dawn.</li>
	    <li>[551593376] High CVE-2026-84351: Buffer overflow in GPU.</li>
	    <li>[553117928] High CVE-2026-84325: Improper input validation in DataTransfer.</li>
	    <li>[498710886] Medium CVE-2026-84328: Missing authorization in FileSystem.</li>
	    <li>[501679156] Medium CVE-2026-84347: Use after free in WebRTC.</li>
	    <li>[502411391] Medium CVE-2026-84323: Missing authorization in FileSystem.</li>
	    <li>[511774376] Medium CVE-2026-84355: Incorrect authorization in Navigation.</li>
	    <li>[514006886] Medium CVE-2026-84358: Improper privilege management in Downloads.</li>
	    <li>[514489238] Medium CVE-2026-84332: Incorrect authorization in SiteSettings.</li>
	    <li>[517091927] Medium CVE-2026-84330: UI misrepresentation in FullScreen.</li>
	    <li>[517798926] Medium CVE-2026-84334: Incorrect authorization in Chromoting.</li>
	    <li>[518100026] Medium CVE-2026-84348: Information leak in MediaCapture.</li>
	    <li>[522302504] Medium CVE-2026-84335: Incorrect authorization in TabStrip.</li>
	    <li>[498725213] Low CVE-2026-84327: Incorrect authorization in Autofill.</li>
	    <li>[498850269] Low CVE-2026-84329: Confused deputy in CredentialProvider.</li>
	    <li>[503787232] Low CVE-2026-84356: UI misrepresentation in FullScreen.</li>
	    <li>[513713427] Low CVE-2026-84350: Use after free in TabStrip.</li>
	    <li>[521753402] Low CVE-2026-84331: Incorrect authorization in Actor.</li>
	 </ul>
       </blockquote>
      </body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-84353</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-84352</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-84354</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-84359</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-84357</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-84324</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-84349</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-84326</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-84333</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-84351</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-84325</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-84328</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-84347</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-84323</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-84355</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-84358</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-84332</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-84330</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-84334</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-84348</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-84335</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-84327</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-84329</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-84356</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-84350</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-84331</cvename>
      <url>https://chromereleases.googleblog.com/2026/09/stable-channel-update-for-desktop.html</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-09-01</discovery>
      <entry>2026-09-02</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="11ab3b16-a65d-11f1-a49c-00a0980083d7">
    <topic>expat2 -- Out-of-bounds Read</topic>
    <affects>
    <package>
	<name>expat2</name>
	<range><lt>2.8.4</lt></range>
    </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>https://github.com/libexpat/libexpat/pull/1331 reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://github.com/libexpat/libexpat/pull/1331">
	  <p>Expat through 2.8.3 contains an out-of-bounds read vulnerability
	that allows attackers to trigger memory corruption by processing
	XML with external entity parsers created via
	XML_ExternalEntityParserCreate.  A struct size mismatch between
	ELEMENT_TYPE members causes storeAtts to read the attIndex member
	past allocated memory boundaries, resulting in failure to normalize
	whitespace in non-CDATA attributes or a wild pointer dereference
	causing a segfault.  This vulnerability was introduced by the fix
	for CVE-2026-66046.</p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-76641</cvename>
      <url>https://cveawg.mitre.org/api/cve/CVE-2026-76641</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-08-20</discovery>
      <entry>2026-09-01</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="88917664-a65c-11f1-a49c-00a0980083d7">
    <topic>expat2 -- Inefficient Algorithmic Complexity</topic>
    <affects>
    <package>
	<name>expat2</name>
	<range><lt>2.8.4</lt></range>
    </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>https://github.com/libexpat/libexpat/pull/1321 reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://github.com/libexpat/libexpat/pull/1321">
	  <p>Expat through 2.8.3 contains a denial of service vulnerability
	caused by quadratic algorithmic complexity in the storeAtts()
	function in xmlparse.c, where processing N specified attributes
	with non-normalized values triggers an O(N^2) linear scan of
	elementType->defaultAtts to determine CDATA status.  A remote
	unauthenticated attacker can supply a single well-formed XML document
	of a few megabytes to an application parsing untrusted XML to cause
	excessive CPU consumption, resulting in denial of service without
	requiring authentication, external entity resolution, or non-default
	parser options.</p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-66046</cvename>
      <url>https://cveawg.mitre.org/api/cve/CVE-2026-66046</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-08-18</discovery>
      <entry>2026-09-01</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="e9dfc357-a63f-11f1-9195-4c526214c986">
    <topic>Erlang/OTP -- multiple vulnerabilities in inets, stdlib, snmp and eldap</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
	<name>erlang</name>
	<range><lt>28.5.0.6,4</lt></range>
      </package>
      <package>
	<name>erlang-runtime27</name>
	<range><lt>27.3.4.17</lt></range>
      </package>
      <package>
	<name>erlang-runtime28</name>
	<range><lt>28.5.0.6</lt></range>
      </package>
      <package>
	<name>erlang-runtime29</name>
	<range><lt>29.0.6</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>The Erlang/OTP project reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://github.com/erlang/otp/security/advisories">
	  <p>OTP 29.0.6, 28.5.0.6 and 27.3.4.17 fix the following
	  issues, most of them in the inets httpd and httpc
	  implementations:</p>
	  <ul>
	    <li>CVE-2026-55951: httpc Memory Exhaustion via Unbounded Header Accumulation.</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-59696: stdlib: Denial-of-Service enabled by Unbounded Integer Conversion.</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-66357: HTTP Request Smuggling via obs-fold Header Continuation in httpd.</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-66835: Possible directory protection bypass in Erlang-OTP inets httpd.</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-69664: Denial of Service via Malformed Chunk Size in httpd.</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-70399: Denial of Service via Unenforced Default max_clients Limit in httpd.</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-70405: snmp: Denial-of-Service enabled by Unbounded Integer Conversion.</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-70409: eldap: Denial-of-Service enabled by Unbounded Integer Conversion.</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-71380: Denial of Service via Body-Read Timeout Gap in httpd (Slowloris Variant).</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-71562: inets: Denial-of-Service enabled by Unbounded Integer Conversion.</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-73270: Authentication Bypass via Case-Insensitive Filesystem Path Matching in httpd mod_auth.</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-73276: HTTP Request Smuggling via Whitespace-Before-Colon Header Dropping in httpd.</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-73812: HTTP Request Smuggling via Transfer-Encoding and Content-Length in httpd.</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-74835: Memory Exhaustion via Unenforced max_body_size During Chunked Body Reception in httpd.</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-74994: Authentication Bypass via Directory Namespace Collapse in httpd mod_auth (dets/mnesia backends).</li>
	  </ul>
	</blockquote>
      </body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-55951</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-59696</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-66357</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-66835</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-69664</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-70399</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-70405</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-70409</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-71380</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-71562</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-73270</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-73276</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-73812</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-74835</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-74994</cvename>
      <url>https://github.com/erlang/otp/security/advisories/GHSA-f9fw-mg7q-4g3x</url>
      <url>https://github.com/erlang/otp/security/advisories/GHSA-8qw4-2chm-mvj2</url>
      <url>https://github.com/erlang/otp/security/advisories/GHSA-qh2f-33hj-37qf</url>
      <url>https://github.com/erlang/otp/security/advisories/GHSA-r4vv-vc2c-2fw6</url>
      <url>https://github.com/erlang/otp/security/advisories/GHSA-mr35-8h7w-w3gq</url>
      <url>https://github.com/erlang/otp/security/advisories/GHSA-pwvh-c689-f8q5</url>
      <url>https://github.com/erlang/otp/security/advisories/GHSA-q7cq-pfgf-5hr7</url>
      <url>https://github.com/erlang/otp/security/advisories/GHSA-9vgh-c8cm-m9p4</url>
      <url>https://github.com/erlang/otp/security/advisories/GHSA-5vp4-58hc-h8cc</url>
      <url>https://github.com/erlang/otp/security/advisories/GHSA-cqx9-9hq6-m8wf</url>
      <url>https://github.com/erlang/otp/security/advisories/GHSA-mh78-93cr-jx8f</url>
      <url>https://github.com/erlang/otp/security/advisories/GHSA-6v7q-jwgh-cx8p</url>
      <url>https://github.com/erlang/otp/security/advisories/GHSA-7j6m-4ffg-hg46</url>
      <url>https://github.com/erlang/otp/security/advisories/GHSA-8qrh-x566-5xv5</url>
      <url>https://github.com/erlang/otp/security/advisories/GHSA-c3cq-q8x6-547g</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-09-01</discovery>
      <entry>2026-09-01</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="62b56853-a609-11f1-9195-4c526214c986">
    <topic>Erlang/OTP -- remote crash via gen_tcp with {packet,4}</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
	<name>erlang</name>
	<range><lt>28.5.0.6,4</lt></range>
      </package>
      <package>
	<name>erlang-runtime27</name>
	<range><lt>27.3.4.17</lt></range>
      </package>
      <package>
	<name>erlang-runtime28</name>
	<range><lt>28.5.0.6</lt></range>
      </package>
      <package>
	<name>erlang-runtime29</name>
	<range><lt>29.0.6</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>The OTP 29.0.6 release notes report:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://github.com/erlang/otp/releases/tag/OTP-29.0.6">
	  <p>A gen_tcp socket using the inet driver and {packet,4} had
	  a bug if receiving a packet with size just below INT_MAX.</p>
	  <p>That packet size wrapped in size calculations and made the
	  received data overwrite its allocation and trash allocator
	  metadata and subsequent block(s), causing the VM to crash.</p>
	  <p>This made it possible for anyone to remotely crash an
	  Erlang node that used {packet,4} on a reachable socket.</p>
	</blockquote>
      </body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-75538</cvename>
      <url>https://github.com/erlang/otp/security/advisories/GHSA-8m6r-2pj2-25pm</url>
      <url>https://github.com/erlang/otp/releases/tag/OTP-29.0.6</url>
      <url>https://github.com/erlang/otp/releases/tag/OTP-28.5.0.6</url>
      <url>https://github.com/erlang/otp/releases/tag/OTP-27.3.4.17</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-09-01</discovery>
      <entry>2026-09-01</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="16cb13dc-a55d-11f1-bf98-a8a1599412c6">
    <topic>chromium -- security fixes</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
       <name>chromium</name>
       <range><lt>152.0.7977.64</lt></range>
      </package>
      <package>
       <name>ungoogled-chromium</name>
       <range><lt>152.0.7977.64</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
       <p>Chrome Releases reports:</p>
       <blockquote cite="https://chromereleases.googleblog.com/2026/08/stable-channel-update-for-desktop_0256176589.html">
	 <p>This update includes 327 security fixes:</p>
	 <ul>
	    <li>[496807874] Critical CVE-2026-79282: Use after free in ANGLE.</li>
	    <li>[516427761] Critical CVE-2026-79290: Use after free in Aura.</li>
	    <li>[516764384] Critical CVE-2026-79054: Use after free in Chromecast.</li>
	    <li>[516777082] Critical CVE-2026-79121: Improper input validation in Chromecast.</li>
	    <li>[516988476] Critical CVE-2026-79224: Use after free in Chromecast.</li>
	    <li>[517518019] Critical CVE-2026-79052: Use after free in Aura.</li>
	    <li>[518006007] Critical CVE-2026-79150: Use after free in Views.</li>
	    <li>[522082472] Critical CVE-2026-78935: Use of uninitialized variable in Mobile.</li>
	    <li>[523704817] Critical CVE-2026-79012: Use after free in Safebrowsing.</li>
	    <li>[532921800] Critical CVE-2026-79200: Use after free in Aura.</li>
	    <li>[532617619] High CVE-2026-78989: Out of bounds read in ANGLE.</li>
	    <li>[508638064] High CVE-2026-79069: Memory corruption in Tint.</li>
	    <li>[498885920] High CVE-2026-79175: Type confusion in Accessibility.</li>
	    <li>[500311587] High CVE-2026-79218: Incorrect authorization in Sandbox.</li>
	    <li>[501892500] High CVE-2026-79195: Use after free in Script.</li>
	    <li>[513261751] High CVE-2026-78939: Use after free in Chromecast.</li>
	    <li>[515470739] High CVE-2026-79194: Use after free in Chromoting.</li>
	    <li>[515473074] High CVE-2026-79247: Use after free in Chromoting.</li>
	    <li>[516947491] High CVE-2026-79219: Use after free in Bluetooth.</li>
	    <li>[517515945] High CVE-2026-79047: Use after free in Views.</li>
	    <li>[517519352] High CVE-2026-79292: Integer overflow in Chromecast.</li>
	    <li>[517527943] High CVE-2026-78986: Uninitialized resource in GPU.</li>
	    <li>[517548647] High CVE-2026-79039: Use after free in Mobile.</li>
	    <li>[517550232] High CVE-2026-78934: Race condition in ReadAloud.</li>
	    <li>[517736936] High CVE-2026-79011: UI misrepresentation in Browser.</li>
	    <li>[517742721] High CVE-2026-78911: Incorrect authorization in USB.</li>
	    <li>[517959443] High CVE-2026-79257: Use after free in Views.</li>
	    <li>[521285077] High CVE-2026-79202: Use after free in Chromecast.</li>
	    <li>[521502218] High CVE-2026-79212: Missing authorization in Passwords.</li>
	    <li>[521942358] High CVE-2026-79183: Use after free in Accessibility.</li>
	    <li>[522294538] High CVE-2026-79155: Race condition in FileSystem.</li>
	    <li>[523095011] High CVE-2026-79093: Incorrect authorization in Paint.</li>
	    <li>[523266585] High CVE-2026-79019: Out of bounds write in ANGLE.</li>
	    <li>[523296105] High CVE-2026-79187: Use after free in WebRTC.</li>
	    <li>[523714535] High CVE-2026-79288: Improper input validation in Autofill.</li>
	    <li>[523717796] High CVE-2026-79130: Buffer overflow in ANGLE.</li>
	    <li>[523723064] High CVE-2026-78965: Uninitialized resource in ANGLE.</li>
	    <li>[523738212] High CVE-2026-79117: Race condition in WebAppInstalls.</li>
	    <li>[524698525] High CVE-2026-79082: Incorrect authorization in Transactions Platform.</li>
	    <li>[525683797] High CVE-2026-79111: Improper input validation in Dawn.</li>
	    <li>[528397177] High CVE-2026-79072: Improper state validation in Performance.</li>
	    <li>[529509587] High CVE-2026-79142: Buffer overflow in ANGLE.</li>
	    <li>[529991907] High CVE-2026-78948: Buffer overflow in WebGL.</li>
	    <li>[532904047] High CVE-2026-78908: Information leak in Canvas.</li>
	    <li>[532914190] High CVE-2026-78895: Information leak in Paint.</li>
	    <li>[532988552] High CVE-2026-79043: Out of bounds write in ANGLE.</li>
	    <li>[534468209] High CVE-2026-79235: Use after free in WebGL.</li>
	    <li>[534591074] High CVE-2026-79232: Use after free in Aura.</li>
	    <li>[535379043] High CVE-2026-79118: Uninitialized resource in ANGLE.</li>
	    <li>[535876894] High CVE-2026-79174: Incorrect authorization in Extensions.</li>
	    <li>[536428615] High CVE-2026-78900: Improper input validation in Media.</li>
	    <li>[536444272] High CVE-2026-79188: Out of bounds write in ANGLE.</li>
	    <li>[536505721] High CVE-2026-79189: Out of bounds write in ANGLE.</li>
	    <li>[536531630] High CVE-2026-79048: Out of bounds write in ANGLE.</li>
	    <li>[536532605] High CVE-2026-79240: Out of bounds write in ANGLE.</li>
	    <li>[536568319] High CVE-2026-79014: Race condition in Autofill.</li>
	    <li>[536606137] High CVE-2026-79198: Use after free in Platform.</li>
	    <li>[536626343] High CVE-2026-79131: Out of bounds write in ANGLE.</li>
	    <li>[536636648] High CVE-2026-79149: Use after free in ANGLE.</li>
	    <li>[536659904] High CVE-2026-79275: Use after free in ANGLE.</li>
	    <li>[536681676] High CVE-2026-79138: Out of bounds write in ANGLE.</li>
	    <li>[537109028] High CVE-2026-79026: Use after free in Extensions.</li>
	    <li>[537233963] High CVE-2026-79027: Use after free in WebRTC.</li>
	    <li>[537835609] High CVE-2026-78904: Type confusion in ANGLE.</li>
	    <li>[540430406] High CVE-2026-78899: Use after free in V8.</li>
	    <li>[540870921] High CVE-2026-78954: Incorrect authorization in Extensions.</li>
	    <li>[543707066] High CVE-2026-79274: Information leak in GPU.</li>
	    <li>[545767601] High CVE-2026-78938: Type confusion in V8.</li>
	    <li>[545820931] High CVE-2026-78952: Out of bounds write in Crashpad.</li>
	    <li>[546670199] High CVE-2026-79236: Type confusion in V8.</li>
	    <li>[548340637] High CVE-2026-79078: Use after free in FedCM.</li>
	    <li>[495021566] Medium CVE-2026-79209: Type confusion in Animation.</li>
	    <li>[40057398] Medium CVE-2026-79030: Observable discrepancy in Autofill.</li>
	    <li>[536913431] Medium CVE-2026-79216: Buffer overflow in Blink.</li>
	    <li>[495579602] Medium CVE-2026-79007: Uninitialized resource in GPU.</li>
	    <li>[495998981] Medium CVE-2026-78893: Information leak in QUIC.</li>
	    <li>[496195129] Medium CVE-2026-79222: Incorrect authorization in CustomTabs.</li>
	    <li>[496292729] Medium CVE-2026-79071: Race condition in GPU.</li>
	    <li>[496395158] Medium CVE-2026-79076: Improper input validation in Sync.</li>
	    <li>[496401361] Medium CVE-2026-79088: Incorrect authorization in FileSystem.</li>
	    <li>[497017869] Medium CVE-2026-79104: Missing authorization in Sensor.</li>
	    <li>[497095313] Medium CVE-2026-79044: Missing authorization in WebAppInstalls.</li>
	    <li>[497205529] Medium CVE-2026-78958: Uninitialized resource in Skia.</li>
	    <li>[497269030] Medium CVE-2026-78961: Incorrect authorization in Core.</li>
	    <li>[497338168] Medium CVE-2026-79262: Incorrect authorization in Network.</li>
	    <li>[497456156] Medium CVE-2026-79106: Improper input validation in Input.</li>
	    <li>[497538341] Medium CVE-2026-79176: UI misrepresentation in Extensions.</li>
	    <li>[497637694] Medium CVE-2026-78966: Externally controlled reference in QUIC.</li>
	    <li>[497646947] Medium CVE-2026-79186: Incorrect authorization in Network.</li>
	    <li>[497839983] Medium CVE-2026-79267: Race condition in Workers.</li>
	    <li>[497854976] Medium CVE-2026-79016: Observable discrepancy in SVG.</li>
	    <li>[497869284] Medium CVE-2026-79010: Operation on a resource after expiration or release in Network.</li>
	    <li>[497940451] Medium CVE-2026-79286: Missing authorization in CustomTabs.</li>
	    <li>[497948894] Medium CVE-2026-78945: Use after free in Views.</li>
	    <li>[497957278] Medium CVE-2026-78999: Improper privilege management in Navigation.</li>
	    <li>[498327743] Medium CVE-2026-78941: Information leak in Core.</li>
	    <li>[498328139] Medium CVE-2026-79032: Improper input validation in Network.</li>
	    <li>[498367544] Medium CVE-2026-79109: Improper input validation in Printing.</li>
	    <li>[499007248] Medium CVE-2026-79256: Externally controlled reference in WebView.</li>
	    <li>[499068536] Medium CVE-2026-79237: Incorrect authorization in Navigation.</li>
	    <li>[499423269] Medium CVE-2026-78898: Incorrect authorization in Downloads.</li>
	    <li>[500038021] Medium CVE-2026-78985: Incorrect reference resolution in FileSystem.</li>
	    <li>[500492844] Medium CVE-2026-79028: Observable discrepancy in Network.</li>
	    <li>[501331457] Medium CVE-2026-79210: Use after free in Audio.</li>
	    <li>[501437087] Medium CVE-2026-79046: Race condition in Permissions.</li>
	    <li>[501572758] Medium CVE-2026-79129: Use after free in Sessions.</li>
	    <li>[501590191] Medium CVE-2026-78937: Use after free in Search.</li>
	    <li>[501594511] Medium CVE-2026-78987: Information leak in Canvas.</li>
	    <li>[501604761] Medium CVE-2026-78990: Use after free in Compositing.</li>
	    <li>[501637242] Medium CVE-2026-78909: Use after free in Views.</li>
	    <li>[501661601] Medium CVE-2026-79271: Information leak in DOM.</li>
	    <li>[501759192] Medium CVE-2026-79144: Information leak in Skia.</li>
	    <li>[501799770] Medium CVE-2026-79065: Improper input validation in Network.</li>
	    <li>[502082953] Medium CVE-2026-79192: Improper input validation in Variations.</li>
	    <li>[502101200] Medium CVE-2026-79140: Use after free in Views.</li>
	    <li>[502109333] Medium CVE-2026-79128: Use after free in Views.</li>
	    <li>[502139081] Medium CVE-2026-78942: Incorrect reference resolution in Loader.</li>
	    <li>[502232151] Medium CVE-2026-79116: Missing authorization in Viz.</li>
	    <li>[502344135] Medium CVE-2026-79006: Protection mechanism failure in HttpsUpgrades.</li>
	    <li>[502488051] Medium CVE-2026-79095: Information leak in Payments.</li>
	    <li>[502805441] Medium CVE-2026-79084: Inadequate encryption strength in Notifications.</li>
	    <li>[502888857] Medium CVE-2026-78991: Race condition in WebProtect.</li>
	    <li>[502918844] Medium CVE-2026-79248: Incorrect authorization in Input.</li>
	    <li>[503013378] Medium CVE-2026-78891: Buffer overflow in WebRTC.</li>
	    <li>[503472696] Medium CVE-2026-79031: Improper resource exposure in Preload.</li>
	    <li>[503585863] Medium CVE-2026-79110: Missing authorization in Preload.</li>
	    <li>[503624894] Medium CVE-2026-79136: Incorrect authorization in ServiceWorker.</li>
	    <li>[503847023] Medium CVE-2026-78907: Incorrect authorization in WebProtect.</li>
	    <li>[504226770] Medium CVE-2026-79087: Injection in Chrome Tabs.</li>
	    <li>[504356442] Medium CVE-2026-79231: Buffer overflow in Media.</li>
	    <li>[504633668] Medium CVE-2026-78969: Uninitialized resource in Video.</li>
	    <li>[505951430] Medium CVE-2026-79137: Incorrect authorization in Extensions.</li>
	    <li>[505967344] Medium CVE-2026-79057: Race condition in Start.</li>
	    <li>[505991181] Medium CVE-2026-78894: Race condition in Payments.</li>
	    <li>[507483993] Medium CVE-2026-79264: Incorrect reference resolution in Preload.</li>
	    <li>[511260796] Medium CVE-2026-78910: Buffer overflow in V8.</li>
	    <li>[511736672] Medium CVE-2026-79066: Improper input validation in Navigation.</li>
	    <li>[511794959] Medium CVE-2026-79255: Improper input validation in WebRTC.</li>
	    <li>[511804361] Medium CVE-2026-79086: Missing authorization in CustomTabs.</li>
	    <li>[511806043] Medium CVE-2026-79038: Incorrect authorization in WebProtect.</li>
	    <li>[511819962] Medium CVE-2026-78940: Improper initialization in Network.</li>
	    <li>[511822878] Medium CVE-2026-79107: Incorrect authorization in TabGroups.</li>
	    <li>[512971896] Medium CVE-2026-79120: Uninitialized resource in ANGLE.</li>
	    <li>[513048462] Medium CVE-2026-79270: Uninitialized resource in ANGLE.</li>
	    <li>[513049445] Medium CVE-2026-79067: Missing authorization in Network.</li>
	    <li>[513119757] Medium CVE-2026-79213: Incorrect authorization in WebAppInstalls.</li>
	    <li>[513192145] Medium CVE-2026-78943: Improper input validation in Editing.</li>
	    <li>[513222422] Medium CVE-2026-79259: Improper input validation in Safebrowsing.</li>
	    <li>[513287677] Medium CVE-2026-79208: Missing authorization in HTTP2.</li>
	    <li>[513392351] Medium CVE-2026-79251: Improper input validation in Network.</li>
	    <li>[513607252] Medium CVE-2026-79226: Improper privilege management in Regional Capabilities.</li>
	    <li>[513608317] Medium CVE-2026-79042: Missing authorization in Payments.</li>
	    <li>[513608831] Medium CVE-2026-79122: Information leak in SignIn.</li>
	    <li>[513719741] Medium CVE-2026-79199: Incorrect authorization in Network.</li>
	    <li>[513737209] Medium CVE-2026-79013: Improper input validation in Sync.</li>
	    <li>[513745793] Medium CVE-2026-79074: Information leak in Network.</li>
	    <li>[513760788] Medium CVE-2026-79215: Integer overflow in WebGL.</li>
	    <li>[513786555] Medium CVE-2026-79049: Incorrect reference resolution in Passwords.</li>
	    <li>[513834155] Medium CVE-2026-79132: Improper input validation in Input.</li>
	    <li>[513836495] Medium CVE-2026-79201: Improper access control in Workers.</li>
	    <li>[513841856] Medium CVE-2026-79051: Incorrect authorization in Loader.</li>
	    <li>[513850062] Medium CVE-2026-79053: Missing authorization in Lighthouse.</li>
	    <li>[513918923] Medium CVE-2026-79285: Uninitialized resource in ANGLE.</li>
	    <li>[513923164] Medium CVE-2026-78906: Race condition in ANGLE.</li>
	    <li>[514006744] Medium CVE-2026-79250: UI misrepresentation in Navigation.</li>
	    <li>[514017820] Medium CVE-2026-79020: Out of bounds read in Skia.</li>
	    <li>[514055709] Medium CVE-2026-79217: Incorrect authorization in Mobile.</li>
	    <li>[514069975] Medium CVE-2026-79204: UI misrepresentation in Input.</li>
	    <li>[514078852] Medium CVE-2026-78912: UI misrepresentation in Browser.</li>
	    <li>[514439436] Medium CVE-2026-78955: Observable discrepancy in PerformanceAPIs.</li>
	    <li>[514454739] Medium CVE-2026-79143: Incorrect authorization in FileSystem.</li>
	    <li>[514508415] Medium CVE-2026-79241: Out of bounds read in GPU.</li>
	    <li>[514529599] Medium CVE-2026-78967: Missing authorization in BFCache.</li>
	    <li>[515477007] Medium CVE-2026-79214: Improper input validation in Preload.</li>
	    <li>[516398679] Medium CVE-2026-79228: Incorrect authorization in SiteIsolation.</li>
	    <li>[516665605] Medium CVE-2026-78953: Missing authorization in SiteIsolation.</li>
	    <li>[516824665] Medium CVE-2026-79229: Uninitialized resource in ANGLE.</li>
	    <li>[516899248] Medium CVE-2026-79002: Incorrect authorization in SiteIsolation.</li>
	    <li>[516921259] Medium CVE-2026-79272: Improper input validation in FindInPage.</li>
	    <li>[517045394] Medium CVE-2026-79127: Out of bounds write in ANGLE.</li>
	    <li>[517074167] Medium CVE-2026-79151: Improper input validation in Safebrowsing.</li>
	    <li>[517095594] Medium CVE-2026-78936: Observable discrepancy in CustomTabs.</li>
	    <li>[517245017] Medium CVE-2026-78905: Type confusion in ANGLE.</li>
	    <li>[517364411] Medium CVE-2026-79050: Incorrect authorization in Network.</li>
	    <li>[517382613] Medium CVE-2026-79008: Improper input validation in GPU.</li>
	    <li>[517398863] Medium CVE-2026-78975: Incorrect authorization in DOM.</li>
	    <li>[517404644] Medium CVE-2026-79287: Observable discrepancy in Forms.</li>
	    <li>[517467117] Medium CVE-2026-79094: Race condition in Workers.</li>
	    <li>[517487890] Medium CVE-2026-79173: UI misrepresentation in WebAppInstalls.</li>
	    <li>[517550421] Medium CVE-2026-78976: Improper input validation in StorageAccessAPI.</li>
	    <li>[517580738] Medium CVE-2026-79276: Improper privilege management in FileSystem.</li>
	    <li>[517606780] Medium CVE-2026-79191: Incorrect authorization in SiteIsolation.</li>
	    <li>[517608454] Medium CVE-2026-79099: Missing authorization in Network.</li>
	    <li>[517634590] Medium CVE-2026-79024: Information leak in ServiceWorker.</li>
	    <li>[517655953] Medium CVE-2026-79193: Information leak in Canvas.</li>
	    <li>[517697155] Medium CVE-2026-79242: Observable discrepancy in HTML.</li>
	    <li>[517719358] Medium CVE-2026-79180: UI misrepresentation in CustomTabs.</li>
	    <li>[517746687] Medium CVE-2026-79293: Information leak in Animation.</li>
	    <li>[517761566] Medium CVE-2026-79023: Incorrect authorization in Editing.</li>
	    <li>[517772510] Medium CVE-2026-79146: Information leak in CustomTabs.</li>
	    <li>[517774971] Medium CVE-2026-79238: Incorrect authorization in ServiceWorker.</li>
	    <li>[517910756] Medium CVE-2026-78949: Observable discrepancy in CustomTabs.</li>
	    <li>[518023156] Medium CVE-2026-79291: Information leak in CSS.</li>
	    <li>[518035396] Medium CVE-2026-79283: UI misrepresentation in Geometry.</li>
	    <li>[518053893] Medium CVE-2026-78892: Incorrect authorization in Chromoting.</li>
	    <li>[518062961] Medium CVE-2026-79070: Incorrect reference resolution in Cache.</li>
	    <li>[518065628] Medium CVE-2026-79205: Incorrect authorization in Network.</li>
	    <li>[518078552] Medium CVE-2026-78903: Incomplete cleanup in SiteIsolation.</li>
	    <li>[518084889] Medium CVE-2026-78959: Improper handling of case sensitivity in FileSystem.</li>
	    <li>[518094442] Medium CVE-2026-79234: Injection in CSS.</li>
	    <li>[519369088] Medium CVE-2026-78983: Use after free in Views.</li>
	    <li>[519984038] Medium CVE-2026-79083: Improper enforcement of behavioral workflow in Media.</li>
	    <li>[520052954] Medium CVE-2026-78944: Use after free in DevTools.</li>
	    <li>[520117546] Medium CVE-2026-79178: Incorrect authorization in Web Authentication (Passkeys &amp; Security Keys).</li>
	    <li>[520121111] Medium CVE-2026-79059: Information leak in BFCache.</li>
	    <li>[520179360] Medium CVE-2026-79245: Use after free in UI.</li>
	    <li>[520464738] Medium CVE-2026-78978: Out of bounds read in ANGLE.</li>
	    <li>[520481800] Medium CVE-2026-79103: Incorrect reference resolution in Speech.</li>
	    <li>[520492291] Medium CVE-2026-79154: Missing authorization in DevTools.</li>
	    <li>[520504922] Medium CVE-2026-79230: Improper input validation in ANGLE.</li>
	    <li>[520516462] Medium CVE-2026-79068: Improper resource exposure in StreamsAPI.</li>
	    <li>[520542088] Medium CVE-2026-79269: Uninitialized resource in ANGLE.</li>
	    <li>[522077127] Medium CVE-2026-79085: Missing authorization in Network.</li>
	    <li>[522351802] Medium CVE-2026-79134: Incorrect authorization in GetUserMedia.</li>
	    <li>[522550059] Medium CVE-2026-79064: Use after free in Network.</li>
	    <li>[522791354] Medium CVE-2026-79003: Incorrect authorization in Device.</li>
	    <li>[522823211] Medium CVE-2026-79220: Information leak in Network.</li>
	    <li>[522957054] Medium CVE-2026-78951: Use after free in ServiceWorker.</li>
	    <li>[523232966] Medium CVE-2026-79249: Code injection in Bisection.</li>
	    <li>[523557855] Medium CVE-2026-79091: Use after free in Bluetooth.</li>
	    <li>[523661149] Medium CVE-2026-79265: Incomplete cleanup in GetUserMedia.</li>
	    <li>[523716748] Medium CVE-2026-78913: Use after free in Chromoting.</li>
	    <li>[524418836] Medium CVE-2026-79258: Incorrect authorization in WebXR.</li>
	    <li>[524520965] Medium CVE-2026-79211: Incorrect authorization in USB.</li>
	    <li>[524541667] Medium CVE-2026-79252: Information leak in ServiceWorker.</li>
	    <li>[524822825] Medium CVE-2026-78962: Uninitialized resource in WebXR.</li>
	    <li>[525686865] Medium CVE-2026-78901: Race condition in V8.</li>
	    <li>[525689847] Medium CVE-2026-79097: Use after free in V8.</li>
	    <li>[532162132] Medium CVE-2026-79227: Type confusion in DevTools.</li>
	    <li>[532182486] Medium CVE-2026-79203: Improper input validation in DevTools.</li>
	    <li>[532914769] Medium CVE-2026-79033: Insufficient control flow management in DevTools.</li>
	    <li>[532917452] Medium CVE-2026-79139: Improper input validation in Media.</li>
	    <li>[532923954] Medium CVE-2026-79221: Uninitialized resource in Dawn.</li>
	    <li>[532957785] Medium CVE-2026-79034: Information leak in CORS.</li>
	    <li>[533093250] Medium CVE-2026-79075: Information leak in Geolocation.</li>
	    <li>[533917984] Medium CVE-2026-78960: Information leak in Extensions.</li>
	    <li>[535374213] Medium CVE-2026-78984: Uninitialized resource in GPU.</li>
	    <li>[536428842] Medium CVE-2026-78963: Improper input validation in Media.</li>
	    <li>[536428988] Medium CVE-2026-79004: Out of bounds read in Media.</li>
	    <li>[536444242] Medium CVE-2026-79182: Improper input validation in Media.</li>
	    <li>[536526176] Medium CVE-2026-79185: Information leak in DOM.</li>
	    <li>[536662911] Medium CVE-2026-79073: Improper state validation in Parser.</li>
	    <li>[537145191] Medium CVE-2026-79266: Use after free in DevTools.</li>
	    <li>[537846307] Medium CVE-2026-79025: Improper input validation in Workers.</li>
	    <li>[538969297] Medium CVE-2026-79141: Incorrect authorization in Browser.</li>
	    <li>[503048520] Low CVE-2026-78974: UI misrepresentation in Linux Toolkit Theming.</li>
	    <li>[497232609] Low CVE-2026-79055: Information leak in Sharing.</li>
	    <li>[497256260] Low CVE-2026-79263: Race condition in Extensions.</li>
	    <li>[497493136] Low CVE-2026-79124: Information leak in Intents.</li>
	    <li>[497499482] Low CVE-2026-79184: Missing authorization in Preload.</li>
	    <li>[497876969] Low CVE-2026-79289: Improper control of a resource through its lifetime in Workers.</li>
	    <li>[500484520] Low CVE-2026-79001: Information leak in Bluetooth.</li>
	    <li>[501416859] Low CVE-2026-79077: Incorrect authorization in WebProtect.</li>
	    <li>[501881082] Low CVE-2026-78950: Integer overflow in WebRTC.</li>
	    <li>[502252964] Low CVE-2026-79196: Race condition in Editing.</li>
	    <li>[502514083] Low CVE-2026-79000: Improper input validation in DeviceBoundSessionCredentials.</li>
	    <li>[503720291] Low CVE-2026-78979: Race condition in Core.</li>
	    <li>[506539337] Low CVE-2026-79181: Observable discrepancy in Glic.</li>
	    <li>[513172858] Low CVE-2026-79190: Incorrect authorization in Extensions.</li>
	    <li>[513361380] Low CVE-2026-79206: Out of bounds read in FileSystem.</li>
	    <li>[513486883] Low CVE-2026-78897: Missing authorization in BrowserTag.</li>
	    <li>[513688690] Low CVE-2026-79119: Use after free in PDF.</li>
	    <li>[513792983] Low CVE-2026-79089: Race condition in Transactions Platform.</li>
	    <li>[513969378] Low CVE-2026-79147: Information leak in Skia.</li>
	    <li>[514010111] Low CVE-2026-79098: UI misrepresentation in PermissionElement.</li>
	    <li>[514038302] Low CVE-2026-79022: UI misrepresentation in Transactions Platform.</li>
	    <li>[514061923] Low CVE-2026-79233: UI misrepresentation in CustomTabs.</li>
	    <li>[514408247] Low CVE-2026-79261: Incorrect authorization in Controls.</li>
	    <li>[516864349] Low CVE-2026-78977: Uninitialized resource in GPU.</li>
	    <li>[516950646] Low CVE-2026-79040: Uninitialized resource in GPU.</li>
	    <li>[517167020] Low CVE-2026-79273: Incorrect reference resolution in WebView.</li>
	    <li>[517394060] Low CVE-2026-79243: Improper input validation in ReadingList.</li>
	    <li>[517395590] Low CVE-2026-79123: Improper input validation in NTP Footer.</li>
	    <li>[517540292] Low CVE-2026-79005: Incorrect authorization in StorageAccessAPI.</li>
	    <li>[517673944] Low CVE-2026-79090: Improper privilege management in Actor.</li>
	    <li>[517718241] Low CVE-2026-78946: Incorrect authorization in Select.</li>
	    <li>[518125889] Low CVE-2026-78968: Missing authorization in Core.</li>
	    <li>[518249083] Low CVE-2026-79041: Missing authorization in Browser.</li>
	    <li>[519210950] Low CVE-2026-79284: UI misrepresentation in Core.</li>
	    <li>[519229463] Low CVE-2026-78896: Information leak in StorageAccessAPI.</li>
	    <li>[519242511] Low CVE-2026-79058: Missing authorization in Passwords.</li>
	    <li>[519246298] Low CVE-2026-79009: UI misrepresentation in UI.</li>
	    <li>[519254827] Low CVE-2026-79060: Incorrect authorization in StorageAccessAPI.</li>
	    <li>[520002854] Low CVE-2026-79177: Incorrect authorization in Media.</li>
	    <li>[520016142] Low CVE-2026-78956: Type confusion in V8.</li>
	    <li>[520781436] Low CVE-2026-79239: Out of bounds read in Tint.</li>
	    <li>[522291712] Low CVE-2026-79015: Improper input validation in ServiceWorker.</li>
	    <li>[522304549] Low CVE-2026-79108: UI misrepresentation in Web Authentication (Passkeys &amp; Security Keys).</li>
	    <li>[522418913] Low CVE-2026-79056: Use after free in ServiceWorker.</li>
	    <li>[522803735] Low CVE-2026-79018: Information leak in FoldableAPIs.</li>
	    <li>[523237735] Low CVE-2026-78980: Improper input validation in ReaderMode.</li>
	    <li>[523313378] Low CVE-2026-78947: Incomplete cleanup in Chromium.</li>
	    <li>[523572877] Low CVE-2026-79244: Use after free in Animation.</li>
	    <li>[524864599] Low CVE-2026-79112: Out of bounds read in Skia.</li>
	    <li>[525311654] Low CVE-2026-79246: Information leak in DataTransfer.</li>
	    <li>[530816571] Low CVE-2026-79223: Integer overflow in Chromium.</li>
	    <li>[531245718] Low CVE-2026-79045: Type confusion in V8.</li>
	    <li>[531297707] Low CVE-2026-79197: Use after free in V8.</li>
	    <li>[532303080] Low CVE-2026-79148: Off-by-one error in DevTools.</li>
	    <li>[533001362] Low CVE-2026-79125: Information leak in XR.</li>
	    <li>[533014006] Low CVE-2026-79207: Information leak in Passwords.</li>
	    <li>[533021205] Low CVE-2026-79017: Race condition in Extensions.</li>
	    <li>[533046298] Low CVE-2026-79105: Improper input validation in Mobile.</li>
	    <li>[533059149] Low CVE-2026-79225: Incorrect authorization in Browser.</li>
	    <li>[533060125] Low CVE-2026-79021: Missing authorization in InterestGroups.</li>
	    <li>[533075126] Low CVE-2026-79133: Incorrect authorization in Forms.</li>
	    <li>[533079345] Low CVE-2026-79179: Incorrect authorization in DOM.</li>
	    <li>[533083384] Low CVE-2026-79152: Incorrect authorization in CustomTabs.</li>
	    <li>[533121405] Low CVE-2026-78981: Information leak in Mobile.</li>
	    <li>[533123348] Low CVE-2026-78957: Information leak in Mobile.</li>
	    <li>[533408915] Low CVE-2026-79126: Incorrect provision of specified functionality in Proxy.</li>
	    <li>[533418127] Low CVE-2026-78915: Race condition in Enterprise.</li>
	    <li>[533511921] Low CVE-2026-79253: Improper input validation in Network.</li>
	    <li>[533511967] Low CVE-2026-79260: Improper input validation in Cookies.</li>
	    <li>[534556413] Low CVE-2026-79254: Incorrect reference resolution in CustomTabs.</li>
	    <li>[536166543] Low CVE-2026-78914: Uninitialized resource in Skia.</li>
	    <li>[539341100] Low CVE-2026-78964: Use after free in Sync.</li>
	 </ul>
       </blockquote>
      </body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-79282</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-79290</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-79054</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-79121</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-79224</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-79052</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-79150</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-78935</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-79012</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-79200</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-78989</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-79069</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-79175</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-79218</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-79195</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-78939</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-79194</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-79247</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-79219</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-79047</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-79292</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-78986</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-79039</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-78934</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-79011</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-78911</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-79257</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-79202</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-79212</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-79183</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-79155</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-79093</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-79019</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-79187</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-79288</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-79130</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-78965</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-79117</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-79082</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-79111</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-79072</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-79142</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-78948</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-78908</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-78895</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-79043</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-79235</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-79232</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-79118</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-79174</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-78900</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-79188</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-79189</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-79048</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-79240</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-79014</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-79198</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-79131</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-79149</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-79275</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-79138</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-79026</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-79027</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-78904</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-78899</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-78954</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-79274</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-78938</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-78952</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-79236</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-79078</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-79209</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-79030</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-79216</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-79007</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-78893</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-79222</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-79071</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-79076</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-79088</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-79104</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-79044</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-78958</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-78961</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-79262</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-79106</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-79176</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-78966</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-79186</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-79267</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-79016</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-79010</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-79286</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-78945</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-78999</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-78941</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-79032</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-79109</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-79256</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-79237</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-78898</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-78985</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-79028</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-79210</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-79046</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-79129</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-78937</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-78987</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-78990</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-78909</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-79271</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-79144</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-79065</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-79192</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-79140</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-79128</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-78942</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-79116</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-79006</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-79095</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-79084</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-78991</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-79248</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-78891</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-79031</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-79110</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-79136</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-78907</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-79087</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-79231</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-78969</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-79137</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-79057</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-78894</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-79264</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-78910</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-79066</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-79255</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-79086</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-79038</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-78940</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-79107</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-79120</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-79270</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-79067</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-79213</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-78943</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-79259</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-79208</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-79251</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-79226</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-79042</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-79122</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-79199</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-79013</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-79074</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-79215</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-79049</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-79132</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-79201</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-79051</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-79053</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-79285</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-78906</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-79250</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-79020</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-79217</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-79204</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-78912</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-78955</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-79143</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-79241</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-78967</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-79214</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-79228</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-78953</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-79229</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-79002</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-79272</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-79127</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-79151</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-78936</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-78905</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-79050</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-79008</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-78975</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-79287</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-79094</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-79173</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-78976</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-79276</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-79191</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-79099</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-79024</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-79193</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-79242</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-79180</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-79293</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-79023</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-79146</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-79238</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-78949</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-79291</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-79283</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-78892</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-79070</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-79205</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-78903</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-78959</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-79234</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-78983</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-79083</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-78944</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-79178</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-79059</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-79245</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-78978</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-79103</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-79154</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-79230</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-79068</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-79269</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-79085</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-79134</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-79064</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-79003</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-79220</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-78951</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-79249</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-79091</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-79265</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-78913</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-79258</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-79211</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-79252</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-78962</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-78901</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-79097</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-79227</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-79203</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-79033</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-79139</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-79221</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-79034</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-79075</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-78960</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-78984</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-78963</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-79004</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-79182</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-79185</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-79073</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-79266</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-79025</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-79141</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-78974</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-79055</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-79263</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-79124</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-79184</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-79289</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-79001</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-79077</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-78950</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-79196</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-79000</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-78979</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-79181</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-79190</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-79206</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-78897</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-79119</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-79089</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-79147</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-79098</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-79022</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-79233</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-79261</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-78977</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-79040</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-79273</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-79243</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-79123</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-79005</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-79090</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-78946</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-78968</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-79041</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-79284</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-78896</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-79058</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-79009</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-79060</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-79177</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-78956</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-79239</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-79015</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-79108</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-79056</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-79018</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-78980</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-78947</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-79244</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-79112</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-79246</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-79223</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-79045</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-79197</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-79148</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-79125</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-79207</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-79017</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-79105</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-79225</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-79021</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-79133</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-79179</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-79152</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-78981</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-78957</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-79126</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-78915</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-79253</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-79260</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-79254</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-78914</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-78964</cvename>
      <url>https://chromereleases.googleblog.com/2026/08/stable-channel-update-for-desktop_0256176589.html</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-08-25</discovery>
      <entry>2026-08-31</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="2eb1927c-a57b-11f1-9b1f-3c7c3fba4204">
    <topic>Keycloak -- multiple vulnerabilities</topic>
    <affects>
	<package>
	  <name>keycloak</name>
	  <range><lt>26.7.3</lt></range>
	</package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>The Keycloak Team reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://www.keycloak.org/2026/08/keycloak-2673-released">
	  <ul>
	    <li>[CVE-2026-35563]: LDAP client implementation in version 2.1.7 does not verify if the server certificate matches the intended LDAP hostname</li>
	    <li>[CVE-2026-16093]: Required signed-JWT assertion policy can be bypassed with unsigned assertion headers</li>
	    <li>[CVE-2026-16072]: Organization managers can create managed members through stored registration links without manage-users</li>
	    <li>[CVE-2026-16108]: Realm default-group reads disclose hidden groups under FGAP v2</li>
	    <li>[CVE-2026-16105]: Missing per-role authorization on RoleContainerResource composite endpoints</li>
	    <li>[CVE-2026-16089]: Authorization codes can be retargeted to another client session</li>
	    <li>[CVE-2026-16104]: Authenticator config surfaces expose raw reCAPTCHA secrets</li>
	    <li>[CVE-2026-16106]: Incorrect authorization in admin role-composite deletion allows delegated admin to remove privileged child roles</li>
	    <li>[CVE-2026-17059]: Information disclosure: GET /roles/{role}/users returns user PII without the per-user view filter</li>
	    <li>[CVE-2026-18218]: Client not-before revocation is ignored when realm not-before is older but nonzero</li>
	    <li>[CVE-2026-18215]: Microsoft external access-token exchange bypasses configured tenant</li>
	    <li>[CVE-2026-18201]: Generic identity-provider creation can bind brokers to organizations without manage-organizations</li>
	    <li>[CVE-2026-18209]: Incomplete fix for redirect_uri OIDC response-parameter injection: forbidden-parameter check (commit 18832bca) inspects only the query string, not the URL fragment</li>
	    <li>[CVE-2026-18214]: Google external access-token exchange bypasses hosted-domain restriction</li>
	    <li>[CVE-2026-18571]: FGAP V2: Group assignment bypass during user creation (POST /users) allows adding unpermitted groups</li>
	    <li>[CVE-2026-18572]: UMA claim token can override the authorization time-policy clock</li>
	    <li>[CVE-2026-18573]: Client access-type condition evaluates updates against the old client type</li>
	    <li>[CVE-2026-18570]: Full-scope-disabled client policy validation can be bypassed by omitting fullScopeAllowed</li>
	    <li>[CVE-2026-19729]: Incomplete fix for CVE-2026-9083 — relative path traversal still enables filesystem probing in 26.6.4</li>
	    <li>[CVE-2026-79652]: Keycloak jwt-bearer authorization grant does not enforce consentRequired</li>
	  </ul>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-35563</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-16093</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-16072</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-16108</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-16105</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-16089</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-16104</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-16106</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17059</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-18218</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-18215</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-18201</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-18209</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-18214</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-18571</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-18572</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-18573</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-18570</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-19729</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-79652</cvename>
      <url>https://www.keycloak.org/2026/08/keycloak-2673-released</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-08-31</discovery>
      <entry>2026-08-31</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="c0acdbac-a524-11f1-8039-589cfc103809">
    <topic>security/sudo-rs -- sudoedit could circumvent /etc/sudoers restrictions</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
	<name>sudo-rs</name>
	<name>sudo-rs-coexist</name>
	<range><ge>0.2.8</ge><lt>0.2.15</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>Trifecta Tech Foundation reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://github.com/trifectatechfoundation/sudo-rs/security/advisories/GHSA-f42v-x7gq-phc8">
	    <p>Users that are explicitly permitted to edit only specific
	      files using sudoedit, are still able to place files in
	      arbitrary directories.</p>

	    <p>This only affects systems where sudoedit is used to give
	      very fine-grained edit permissions, which is not the default
	      configuration. For users that have full sudoedit permission
	      or no sudoedit permission at all, no escalation is enabled by
	      this bug.</p>

	    <p>A user that is allowed to place files in an arbitrary
	      directory can (by placing a file in /etc/sudoers.d) obviously
	      fully escalate their privileges.</p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <url>https://github.com/trifectatechfoundation/sudo-rs/security/advisories/GHSA-f42v-x7gq-phc8</url>
      <url>https://github.com/trifectatechfoundation/sudo-rs/releases/tag/v0.2.15</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-08-31</discovery>
      <entry>2026-08-31</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="d2e1db41-f7a7-45e9-ace3-b94038416545">
    <topic>net-p2p/c-lightning -- unknown vulnerability</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
	<name>c-lightning</name>
	<range><lt>26.06.7</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>Core Lightning team reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://github.com/ElementsProject/lightning/releases/tag/v26.06.7">
	    <p>This point release includes fixes for vulnerabilities responsibly
	      reported by a number of sources. It also comes at a time when
	      increasingly capable AI models are being used to identify
	      potential vulnerabilities in open-source code, significantly
	      increasing the volume and pace of security reports.</p>

	    <p>The potential impact and associated risks are front of mind for
	      everyone involved, not least the remediation team who have worked
	      tirelessly to triage, resolve, and compile this release.</p>

	    <p>This embargo period will last for two weeks. The source code
	      will not be published until 14 days have passed. During this time,
	      we strongly encourage everyone to upgrade. At the end of this
	      two-week period, the full release details will be made
	      available.</p>

	    <p>This delay is designed to reduce the chances of prospective
	      attackers reverse-engineering the fixes and exploiting them before
	      the network can update.</p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <url>https://github.com/ElementsProject/lightning/releases/tag/v26.06.7</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-08-27</discovery>
      <entry>2026-08-29</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="4d06b948-a323-11f1-a655-3497f65b111b">
    <topic>phpBB -- multiple vulnerabilities</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
	<name>phpbb3</name>
	<range><lt>3.3.17</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>The phpBB Team reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://github.com/phpbb/phpbb/blob/release-3.3.17/phpBB/docs/CHANGELOG.html">
	  <p>Changes since 3.3.16: Improper state verification in OAuth
	    implementation (SECURITY-293), improve secure downloads referer
	    checking (SECURITY-292), hardening of hostname lookups
	    (SECURITY-295).</p>
	  <p>Changes since 3.3.15: Password Reset Link Poisoning
	    (SECURITY-285), IDOR when composing PMs (SECURITY-286), CSRF on
	    report submission (SECURITY-287), Cross-User Notification Read
	    State Manipulation (SECURITY-290), hardening against
	    non-rasterized image uploads (SECURITY-289).</p>
	  <p>Changes since 3.3.14: Use jQuery to generate HTML from page
	    data (SECURITY-283).</p>
	</blockquote>
	<p>The password reset issue fixed in 3.3.16 has been assigned
	  CVE-2026-29199 (CVSS 8.1). When force_server_vars is disabled,
	  phpBB takes the host name from the HTTP Host header to build the
	  password reset link, so an attacker able to control that header
	  can have reset mails point to a domain under their control, which
	  may lead to account takeover.</p>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-29199</cvename>
      <url>https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-7gm6-w7mx-58cr</url>
      <url>https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-29199</url>
      <url>https://www.phpbb.com/community/viewtopic.php?t=2671024</url>
      <url>https://github.com/phpbb/phpbb/blob/release-3.3.17/phpBB/docs/CHANGELOG.html</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-05-04</discovery>
      <entry>2026-08-28</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="aac25935-f19d-4ac8-80fc-043365686a63">
    <topic>Elixir -- Denial of service via uncontrolled recursion in charlist conversion</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
	<name>elixir</name>
	<range><ge>1.15.0</ge><lt>1.18.5</lt></range>
	<range><ge>1.19.0</ge><lt>1.19.6</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>tomciopp reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://github.com/elixir-lang/elixir/security/advisories/GHSA-jf5q-v438-665c">
	  <p>Uncontrolled recursion in the Elixir standard library lets an
	    attacker who controls a list passed to inspect/1,
	    List.to_string/1, or List.to_charlist/1 exhaust a BEAM node's
	    memory.</p>
	  <p>Inspect.List checks only a bounded prefix (4096 elements by
	    default) to determine whether a list is a charlist, then attempts
	    to convert the entire list. When a list contains a long printable
	    prefix followed by an invalid element, the classification passes
	    but the conversion fails. The error handling path then inspects
	    the same list again, creating unbounded recursion that grows
	    process memory until heap limits are exceeded or the node
	    exhausts resources.</p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-75758</cvename>
      <url>https://github.com/elixir-lang/elixir/security/advisories/GHSA-jf5q-v438-665c</url>
      <url>https://github.com/elixir-lang/elixir/releases/tag/v1.19.6</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-08-28</discovery>
      <entry>2026-08-28</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="2ab3c852-d10a-4d68-be6b-80619116c33a">
    <topic>Elixir -- Denial of service via uncontrolled recursion in charlist conversion</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
	<name>elixir-devel</name>
	<range><ge>1.19.0</ge><lt>1.19.6</lt></range>
	<range><ge>1.20.0</ge><lt>1.20.4</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>tomciopp reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://github.com/elixir-lang/elixir/security/advisories/GHSA-jf5q-v438-665c">
	  <p>Uncontrolled recursion in the Elixir standard library lets an
	    attacker who controls a list passed to inspect/1,
	    List.to_string/1, or List.to_charlist/1 exhaust a BEAM node's
	    memory.</p>
	  <p>Inspect.List checks only a bounded prefix (4096 elements by
	    default) to determine whether a list is a charlist, then attempts
	    to convert the entire list. When a list contains a long printable
	    prefix followed by an invalid element, the classification passes
	    but the conversion fails. The error handling path then inspects
	    the same list again, creating unbounded recursion that grows
	    process memory until heap limits are exceeded or the node
	    exhausts resources.</p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-75758</cvename>
      <url>https://github.com/elixir-lang/elixir/security/advisories/GHSA-jf5q-v438-665c</url>
      <url>https://github.com/elixir-lang/elixir/releases/tag/v1.20.4</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-08-28</discovery>
      <entry>2026-08-28</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="a711b018-a24b-11f1-81e6-3c7c3fba4204">
    <topic>NSD -- multiple vulnerabilities</topic>
    <affects>
	<package>
	  <name>nsd</name>
	  <range><lt>4.15.1</lt></range>
	</package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>NLnet Labs reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://community.nlnetlabs.nl/t/nsd-4-15-1-security-release/3447">
	  <ul>
	    <li>CVE-2026-18664: IP range access control restrictions are bypassed for some unintended IP. Reported by <a href="https://qifanz.com/">Qifan Zhang from Palo Alto Networks</a>, <a href="https://claude.ai">Claude</a> and <a href="https://adalogics.com/">Ada Logics</a>.</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-18916: Any remote client can denial TCP service by throttling the TCP receive window (down to 1). Reported by <a href="https://github.com/akoul">akoul (Akhil Koul)</a></li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-19401: Any remote client can denial UDP service by sending a specifically crafted query with multiple DNS Cookie options.  Reported by <a href="https://qifanz.com/">Qifan Zhang from Palo Alto Networks</a> and <a href="mailto:zhangph@yandex.com">afldl</a>.</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-19538: Anyone with access to the proxy protocol port over TCP or TLS can bypass BLOCKED access control items. Reported by <a href="https://qifanz.com/">Qifan Zhang from Palo Alto Networks</a>.</li>
	  </ul>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-18664</cvename>
      <url>https://www.nlnetlabs.nl/downloads/nsd/CVE-2026-18664.txt</url>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-18916</cvename>
      <url>https://www.nlnetlabs.nl/downloads/nsd/CVE-2026-18916.txt</url>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-19401</cvename>
      <url>https://www.nlnetlabs.nl/downloads/nsd/CVE-2026-19401.txt</url>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-19538</cvename>
      <url>https://www.nlnetlabs.nl/downloads/nsd/CVE-2026-19538.txt</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-08-26</discovery>
      <entry>2026-08-27</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="161b1c49-a29b-11f1-a883-2cf05da270f3">
    <topic>Gitlab -- Vulnerabilities</topic>
    <affects>
<package>
	<name>gitlab-ce</name>
	<name>gitlab-ee</name>
	<range><ge>19.3.0</ge><lt>19.3.1</lt></range>
	<range><ge>19.2.0</ge><lt>19.2.5</lt></range>
	<range><ge>11.3.0</ge><lt>19.1.7</lt></range>
</package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>Gitlab reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://docs.gitlab.com/releases/patches/patch-release-gitlab-19-3-1-released/?nav=19.3.1">
	  <p>Inclusion of Functionality from Untrusted Control Sphere issue in Duo Claude AI agent impacts GitLab EE</p>
	  <p>Denial of Service issue in import pipeline impacts GitLab CE/EE</p>
	  <p>Denial of Service issue in SCIM API impacts GitLab EE</p>
	  <p>Improper Access Control issue in protected environments impacts GitLab EE</p>
	  <p>Authorization Bypass issue in compliance framework assignment impacts GitLab EE</p>
	  <p>Improper Handling of Untrusted Data issue in Pipeline Execution Policies impacts GitLab EE</p>
	  <p>Improper Authorization issue in merge request approval rules reset impacts GitLab EE</p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-18252</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-77801</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2025-10903</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-3035</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-4398</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-15387</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-7487</cvename>
      <url>https://docs.gitlab.com/releases/patches/patch-release-gitlab-19-3-1-released/?nav=19.3.1</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-08-26</discovery>
      <entry>2026-08-28</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="db135cd1-a232-11f1-85ed-10ffe07f9334">
    <topic>PHP Composer -- Multiple vulnerabilities</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
	<name>php82-composer</name>
	<name>php83-composer</name>
	<name>php84-composer</name>
	<name>php85-composer</name>
	<range><lt>2.10.3</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>Composer project reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://github.com/composer/composer/releases/tag/2.10.3">
	  <p>Validate package bin paths against path traversal using symlinks (GHSA-96h3-5x6v-m776, CVE-2026-59944)</p>
	  <p>Fixed command injection via malicious Perforce url (GHSA-rvx4-ffvw-m9q3)</p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-59944</cvename>
      <url>https://github.com/composer/composer/security/advisories/GHSA-96h3-5x6v-m776</url>
      <url>https://github.com/composer/composer/security/advisories/GHSA-rvx4-ffvw-m9q3</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-08-27</discovery>
      <entry>2026-08-27</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="fee67ad5-a05e-11f1-ad2b-40b034429ecf">
    <topic>net/rsync -- multiple vulnerabilities</topic>
    <affects>
<package>
<name>rsync</name>
<range><lt>3.5.0</lt></range>
</package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>rsync project reports:</p>
	<p>This release fixes 33 security issues found during a focused audit of rsync's path
      handling and daemon protocol, a companion daemon-protocol fuzzing pass, and reports
	  from external researchers -- plus several robustness hardenings. CVE IDs were assigned
	  by VulnCheck (CNA); the precise "introduced in" version ranges accompany each advisory,
	  and many are much narrower than "everything before 3.5.0". Every fix ships with a
	  regression test in the test suite that fails on the unfixed tree.</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://download.samba.org/pub/rsync/NEWS#3.5.0">
    <ul>
      <li>CVE-2026-53802 (HIGH): Arbitrary file read / transfer-shaping via symlinked operator-supplied input files.</li>
      <li>CVE-2026-53803 (HIGH): Arbitrary file write / privilege escalation via symlinked operator-supplied output paths.</li>
      <li>CVE-2026-53785 (HIGH): Under --relative, the receiver's implied-parent creation (make_path()) built the parent chain with a plain mkdir() on the full path.</li>
      <li>CVE-2026-53784 (HIGH): Daemon module-root chdir escape under use chroot = no.</li>
      <li>CVE-2026-53793 (HIGH): Chroot /./ inner-module escape a symlinked parent component.</li>
      <li>CVE-2026-53795 (HIGH): An absolute --temp-dir or --link-dest disabled the receiver's rename/link confinement.</li>
      <li>CVE-2026-53796 (MEDIUM): A non-daemon receiver's one-time chdir() into the operator-named destination was not fully confined.</li>
      <li>CVE-2026-53797 (MEDIUM): A non-daemon sender opened each transferred file's content by path (leaf O_NOFOLLOW only).</li>
      <li>CVE-2026-53799 (MEDIUM): Receiver ACL/xattr metadata application followed a symlink race.</li>
      <li>CVE-2026-53800 (MEDIUM): Sender --remove-source-files unlink followed a parent-component symlink race.</li>
      <li>CVE-2026-53801 (MEDIUM): Sender/daemon directory-scan enumeration escaped the transfer root / module.</li>
    </ul>
    <p>support/rrsync (the restricted SSH wrapper):</p>
    <ul>
      <li>CVE-2026-53783 (HIGH): rrsync restricted-directory escape.</li>
    </ul>
    <p>Daemon protocol / identity:</p>
    <ul>
      <li>CVE-2026-53786 (MEDIUM): A client-supplied --filter merge file bypassed the module filter list.</li>
      <li>CVE-2026-53798 (MEDIUM): The daemon name converter mapped an unknown name to uid/gid 0.</li>
      <li>CVE-2026-53788 (MEDIUM): A peer-controlled name containing a newline/CR was written verbatim into the name-converter line protocol.</li>
      <li>CVE-2026-53789 (MEDIUM): A malicious daemon-sender could widen --delete scope by omitting the "no content dir" flag on an implied parent.</li>
      <li>CVE-2026-53791 (CRITICAL): With proxy protocol = true, a client connecting directly (not via the trusted proxy) could send a PROXY header to spoof its source address.</li>
    </ul>
    <p>Injection and memory safety:</p>
    <ul>
      <li>CVE-2026-53790 (HIGH): Command / argument injection via unquoted peer- or host-controlled values      the RSYNC_CONNECT_PROG %H host substitution.</li>
      <li>CVE-2026-53792 (MEDIUM): A malicious receiver sending a checksum header with a block count > 0 but block length == 0 drove the sender's rolling-match arithmetic negative.</li>
      <li>CVE-2026-53794 (MEDIUM): --max-alloc=0 disabled the per-allocation size cap.</li>
    </ul>
    <p>Peer-triggerable memory corruption in the daemon protocol:</p>
    <ul>
      <li>CVE-2026-70461 (HIGH): a one-byte heap out-of-bounds write in add_implied_include().</li>
      <li>CVE-2026-70458 (HIGH): an out-of-bounds write from a file entry marked FLAG_HLINKED that the receiver accepted even though -H was not in effect.</li>
      <li>CVE-2026-70456 (HIGH): an out-of-bounds heap write in read_args() when the peer's argument count lands exactly on maxargs.</li>
      <li>CVE-2026-70457 (MEDIUM): an attacker-chosen-offset write in parse_size_arg()'s error formatting.</li>
      <li>CVE-2026-70459 (MEDIUM): a wild-pointer read crashing the per-connection daemon child.</li>
    </ul>
    <p>Daemon availability and access control:</p>
    <ul>
      <li>CVE-2026-70464 (HIGH): an unauthenticated peer could complete the @RSYNCD greeting and then stall forever.</li>
      <li>CVE-2026-70455 (HIGH): a daemon client could request an arbitrary Zstandard worker count via --compress-threads.</li>
      <li>CVE-2026-70453 (HIGH): quadratic CPU exhaustion in hash_search() from a crafted chain of equal weak checksums.</li>
      <li>CVE-2026-70452 (HIGH): hosts deny failed OPEN when a configured hostname could not be resolved.</li>
      <li>CVE-2026-70463 (HIGH): auth users ignored its documented comma-only parsing.</li>
      <li>CVE-2026-70460 (HIGH): a peer-supplied --partial-dir or --backup-dir was resolved by pathname.</li>
    </ul>
    <p>Client-side:</p>
    <ul>
      <li>CVE-2026-70462 (MEDIUM): a peer-supplied MSG_IO_TIMEOUT defeated the client's own I/O timeout.</li>
      <li>CVE-2026-70454 (MEDIUM): rsync-ssl established an unauthenticated TLS connection.</li>
    </ul>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-53802</cvename>
      <url>https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-53802</url>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-53803</cvename>
      <url>https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-53803</url>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-53785</cvename>
      <url>https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-53785</url>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-53784</cvename>
      <url>https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-53784</url>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-53793</cvename>
      <url>https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-53793</url>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-53795</cvename>
      <url>https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-53795</url>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-53796</cvename>
      <url>https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-53796</url>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-53797</cvename>
      <url>https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-53797</url>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-53799</cvename>
      <url>https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-53799</url>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-53800</cvename>
      <url>https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-53800</url>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-53801</cvename>
      <url>https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-53801</url>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-53783</cvename>
      <url>https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-53783</url>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-53786</cvename>
      <url>https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-53786</url>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-53798</cvename>
      <url>https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-53798</url>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-53788</cvename>
      <url>https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-53788</url>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-53789</cvename>
      <url>https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-53789</url>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-53791</cvename>
      <url>https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-53791</url>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-53790</cvename>
      <url>https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-53790</url>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-53792</cvename>
      <url>https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-53792</url>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-53794</cvename>
      <url>https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-53794</url>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-70461</cvename>
      <url>https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-70461</url>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-70458</cvename>
      <url>https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-70458</url>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-70456</cvename>
      <url>https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-70456</url>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-70457</cvename>
      <url>https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-70457</url>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-70459</cvename>
      <url>https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-70459</url>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-70464</cvename>
      <url>https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-70464</url>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-70455</cvename>
      <url>https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-70455</url>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-70453</cvename>
      <url>https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-70453</url>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-70452</cvename>
      <url>https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-70452</url>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-70463</cvename>
      <url>https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-70463</url>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-70460</cvename>
      <url>https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-70460</url>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-70462</cvename>
      <url>https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-70462</url>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-70454</cvename>
      <url>https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-70454</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-08-13</discovery>
      <entry>2026-08-25</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="1ff5a036-a13e-11f1-a129-901b0e9408dc">
    <topic>conduit -- authentication bypass vulnerability</topic>
    <affects>
<package>
<name>matrix-conduit</name>
<range><lt>0.10.13</lt></range>
</package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>Conduit team reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://conduit.rs/changelog/#v0-10-13-2026-08-26">
	  <p>Fixes a vulnerability where endpoints which required
	  authentication, but functionality do not depend on the
	  user/server calling it, could have their authentication
	  bypassed, as well as causing crashes for all other
	  authenticated endpoints. It is recommended you upgrade
	  ASAP.</p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <url>https://conduit.rs/changelog/#v0-10-13-2026-08-26</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-08-26</discovery>
      <entry>2026-08-26</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="ef63188f-a0ff-11f1-ae1f-bc241121aa0a">
    <topic>FreeBSD -- TOCTOU race in POSIX shared memory large page configuration</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
	<name>FreeBSD-kernel</name>
	<range><ge>15.1</ge><lt>15.1_3</lt></range>
	<range><ge>15.0</ge><lt>15.0_13</lt></range>
	<range><ge>14.4</ge><lt>14.4_9</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<h1>Problem Description:</h1>
	  <p>The FIOSSHMLPGCNF ioctl(2) operation configures the page size
	  for a largepage shared memory object.  This is intended to be used
	  immediately after creating the object, before any memory is allocated
	  for the object.  The handler checked whether a page size had already
	  been configured without holding the rangelock.  Two concurrent
	  callers could both observe an unconfigured object and set conflicting
	  page sizes, leaving the object in an inconsistent state.</p>
	<h1>Impact:</h1>
	  <p>An unprivileged local user can exploit this race to escalate
	  privileges.</p>
      </body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-58094</cvename>
      <freebsdsa>SA-26:63.posixshm</freebsdsa>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-08-25</discovery>
      <entry>2026-08-26</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="a34b5154-a0ff-11f1-ae1f-bc241121aa0a">
    <topic>FreeBSD -- Kernel use-after-free via tty ioctls</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
	<name>FreeBSD-kernel</name>
	<range><ge>15.1</ge><lt>15.1_3</lt></range>
	<range><ge>15.0</ge><lt>15.0_13</lt></range>
	<range><ge>14.4</ge><lt>14.4_9</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<h1>Problem Description:</h1>
	  <p>The TIOCSCTTY ioctl handler drops the tty lock in order to
	  acquire the process tree lock.  After reacquiring the tty lock, the
	  handler did not revalidate the state of the terminal, and could
	  proceed to link a terminal that was concurrently being destroyed
	  to the calling process' session.</p>
	<h1>Impact:</h1>
	  <p>An unprivileged local user can exploit this race condition to
	  escalate privileges.</p>
      </body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-58093</cvename>
      <freebsdsa>SA-26:62.tty</freebsdsa>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-08-25</discovery>
      <entry>2026-08-26</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="204af099-a0ff-11f1-ae1f-bc241121aa0a">
    <topic>FreeBSD -- Multiple vulnerabilities in ppp(8)</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
	<name>FreeBSD-kernel</name>
	<range><ge>15.1</ge><lt>15.1_3</lt></range>
	<range><ge>15.0</ge><lt>15.0_13</lt></range>
	<range><ge>14.4</ge><lt>14.4_9</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<h1>Problem Description:</h1>
	  <p>ppp(8) contained three memory safety errors in its handling of
	  multilink endpoint discriminator options.</p>
	  <p>mp_Enddisc() used incorrect length calculations when formatting
	  endpoint discriminator addresses for display, allowing a received
	  endpoint option to overflow a global result buffer.  [CVE-2026-58095]</p>
	  <p>LcpDecodeConfig() did not validate the length of received endpoint
	  discriminator options against the minimum required by RFC 1717.
	  Undersized options would trigger an out-of-bounds write.  [CVE-2026-58096]</p>
	  <p>mp_SetEnddisc() copied a user-supplied PSN endpoint value without
	  length validation, allowing a buffer overflow via the ppp(8) command
	  interface.  [CVE-2026-58097]</p>
	<h1>Impact:</h1>
	  <p>A malicious PPP peer can exploit CVE-2026-58095 and CVE-2026-58096
	  to crash ppp(8) or potentially execute arbitrary code as root.  A
	  local user with access to the ppp(8) command interface can exploit
	  CVE-2026-58097 similarly.</p>
      </body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-58095</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-58096</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-58097</cvename>
      <freebsdsa>SA-26:60.ppp</freebsdsa>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-08-25</discovery>
      <entry>2026-08-26</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="55fbe7b1-a0fe-11f1-ae1f-bc241121aa0a">
    <topic>FreeBSD -- Unauthorized credential switching</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
	<name>FreeBSD-kernel</name>
	<range><ge>15.1</ge><lt>15.1_3</lt></range>
	<range><ge>15.0</ge><lt>15.0_13</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<h1>Problem Description:</h1>
	  <p>In FreeBSD 15.0, the kernel structure used to represent user
	  credentials changed: previously the primary group ID was stored in
	  the first element of the array containing the list of supplementary
	  group IDs, whereas now the primary group ID is stored in a dedicated
	  field.  This change was largely internal to the kernel and not
	  user-visible.</p>
	  <p>One function, group_is_primary(), was not properly updated as a
	  part of this transition.  This function is used by mac_do to determine
	  the primary group ID of the credential after applying a transition
	  rule, used when the rule target does not explicitly specify a group.</p>
	  <p>As a result, with certain mac_do rules, it is possible for a
	  credential switch to incorrectly set the primary group ID to the
	  ID stored in the first element of the original credential's
	  supplementary group array.  If the list of supplementary groups is
	  empty, this value will be 0, corresponding to the "wheel" group.
	  For example, a rule such as "uid=1001>uid=1002" can be abused to
	  set the primary group ID to 0 even if the process did not originally
	  belong to group 0.</p>
	<h1>Impact:</h1>
	  <p>Certain mac_do rules can be abused to set a process' group ID
	  to 0.  Note however, that the rule must apply to the caller in order
	  for the bug to be triggered, e.g., given the ruleset "uid=1001>uid=1002",
	  the user must have user ID 1001 in order to trigger the bug.</p>
	  <p>Further, logged-in users will in general have a non-empty supplementary
	  group list, in which case the bug can at worst be used to set the
	  credential's first supplementary group ID as its primary group ID.
	  Processes must explicitly remove themselves from all supplementary
	  groups, using the privileged setgroups(2) system call, in order to
	  exploit the bug to set 0 as the primary group ID.</p>
	  <p>Since membership in group 0 is often used to enable controlled
	  privilege escalation, the bug might be further exploitable to obtain
	  root privileges, depending on the system configuration.  For instance,
	  a ruleset such as the following could be exploited by a process
	  running as user 1001 and with an empty supplementary group list:
	  "uid=1001>uid=1002;gid=0>uid=0".</p>
      </body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-58092</cvename>
      <freebsdsa>SA-26:59.mac_do</freebsdsa>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-08-25</discovery>
      <entry>2026-08-26</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="226751fb-a0fe-11f1-ae1f-bc241121aa0a">
    <topic>FreeBSD -- Kernel use-after-free via the SNDCTL_DSP_SYNCSTART ioctl</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
	<name>FreeBSD-kernel</name>
	<range><ge>15.1</ge><lt>15.1_3</lt></range>
	<range><ge>15.0</ge><lt>15.0_13</lt></range>
	<range><ge>14.4</ge><lt>14.4_9</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<h1>Problem Description:</h1>
	  <p>The implementation of this ioctl attempts to acquire locks on
	  all channels in a sync group.  If locking a channel would block,
	  it releases the sync group list lock and sleeps.  Upon reawakening,
	  it is possible that the sync group structure is freed, but the
	  implementation did not handle this possibility.</p>
	<h1>Impact:</h1>
	  <p>On a system with a multiple audio devices, an unprivileged local
	  user can exploit this use-after-free to escalate privileges.</p>
      </body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-58091</cvename>
      <freebsdsa>SA-26:58.sound</freebsdsa>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-08-25</discovery>
      <entry>2026-08-26</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="e99e4b19-a0fd-11f1-ae1f-bc241121aa0a">
    <topic>FreeBSD -- Use-after-free in unix SOCK_STREAM message handling</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
	<name>FreeBSD-kernel</name>
	<range><ge>15.1</ge><lt>15.1_3</lt></range>
	<range><ge>15.0</ge><lt>15.0_13</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<h1>Problem Description:</h1>
	  <p>The SOCK_STREAM receive path in the unix socket implementation
	  failed to fully detach control messages from the socket buffer
	  before processing them.  Some error paths would free those messages,
	  leaving freed data mbufs in the receive socket buffer.</p>
	<h1>Impact:</h1>
	  <p>An unprivileged local user can exploit this use-after-free to
	  escalate privileges.</p>
      </body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-58090</cvename>
      <freebsdsa>SA-26:57.unix</freebsdsa>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-08-25</discovery>
      <entry>2026-08-26</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="9c2801aa-a0fd-11f1-ae1f-bc241121aa0a">
    <topic>FreeBSD -- hwpmc fails to detach PMCs during exec credential transitions</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
	<name>FreeBSD-kernel</name>
	<range><ge>15.1</ge><lt>15.1_3</lt></range>
	<range><ge>15.0</ge><lt>15.0_13</lt></range>
	<range><ge>14.4</ge><lt>14.4_9</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<h1>Problem Description:</h1>
	  <p>When a process calls execve(2) to execute a setuid or setgid
	  image, hwpmc(4) is supposed to detach PMCs owned by unprivileged
	  processes.  An inverted check meant that this scenario was not
	  handled properly.</p>
	<h1>Impact:</h1>
	  <p>An unprivileged local user who has attached PMCs to a process
	  can continue monitoring it after the process executes a setuid or
	  setgid binary, contrary to the intended policy.</p>
      </body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-58089</cvename>
      <freebsdsa>SA-26:56.hwpmc</freebsdsa>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-08-25</discovery>
      <entry>2026-08-26</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="9008d14d-a0af-11f1-8144-8447094a420f">
    <topic>OpenSSL -- Multiple vulnerabilities</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
	<name>openssl</name>
	<range><lt>3.0.22,1</lt></range>
      </package>
      <package>
	<name>openssl34</name>
	<range><lt>3.4.7</lt></range>
      </package>
      <package>
	<name>openssl35</name>
	<range><lt>3.5.8</lt></range>
      </package>
      <package>
	<name>openssl36</name>
	<range><lt>3.6.4</lt></range>
      </package>
      <package>
	<name>openssl40</name>
	<range><lt>4.0.2</lt></range>
      </package>
      <package>
	<name>FreeBSD</name>
	<range><ge>15.1</ge><lt>15.1_3</lt></range>
	<range><ge>15.0</ge><lt>15.0_13</lt></range>
	<range><ge>14.4</ge><lt>14.4_9</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>The OpenSSL poject reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://openssl-library.org/news/secadv/20260825.txt">
	  <ul>
	    <li>Heap Buffer Overflow in CMS Key Unwrapping (CVE-2026-63072) (Moderate)</li>
	    <li>Invalid Pointer Dereference in CMP Server via Crafted protectionAlg (CVE-2026-63076) (Moderate)</li>
	    <li>RPK Server Signature Algorithm Selection Can Dereference a Missing Certificate (CVE-2026-14457) (Low)</li>
	    <li>Excessive Memory Use Buffering DTLS Records for a Future Epoch (CVE-2026-54874) (Low)</li>
	    <li>Untrusted Sender DN Used as Format String in CMP Response Validation (CVE-2026-63073) (Low)</li>
	    <li>CMP Indefinite Cache Growth of ExtraCerts (CVE-2026-63074) (Low)</li>
	    <li>QUIC ACK-only Packet Retention Can Cause Memory Exhaustion (CVE-2026-63075) (Low)</li>
	    <li>AEAD Forgeries with Empty Ciphertext When Using EVP_Cipher() (CVE-2026-75803) (Low)</li>
	  </ul>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-63072</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-63076</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-14457</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-54874</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-63073</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-63074</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-63075</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-75803</cvename>
      <url>https://openssl-library.org/news/secadv/20260825.txt</url>
      <freebsdsa>SA-26:61.openssl</freebsdsa>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-08-25</discovery>
      <entry>2026-08-25</entry>
      <modified>2026-08-26</modified>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="f68670ea-a05d-11f1-8144-8447094a420f">
    <topic>MariaDB -- Multiple vulnerabilities</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
	<name>mariadb106-server</name>
	<range><lt>10.6.28</lt></range>
      </package>
      <package>
	<name>mariadb1011-server</name>
	<range><lt>10.11.19</lt></range>
      </package>
      <package>
	<name>mariadb114-server</name>
	<range><lt>11.4.13</lt></range>
      </package>
      <package>
	<name>mariadb118-server</name>
	<range><lt>11.8.9</lt></range>
      </package>
      <package>
	<name>mariadb123-server</name>
	<range><lt>12.3.3</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>The MariaDB project reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://mariadb.com/docs/release-notes/community-server/12.3/12.3.3">
	  <p>Details in links</p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-61081</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-60585</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-60331</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-60747</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-47023</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-60184</cvename>
      <url>https://mariadb.com/docs/release-notes/community-server/12.3/12.3.3</url>
      <url>https://mariadb.com/docs/release-notes/community-server/11.8/11.8.9</url>
      <url>https://mariadb.com/docs/release-notes/community-server/11.4/11.4.13</url>
      <url>https://mariadb.com/docs/release-notes/community-server/10.11/10.11.19</url>
      <url>https://mariadb.com/docs/release-notes/community-server/10.6/10.6.28</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-08-25</discovery>
      <entry>2026-08-25</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="a7b4cdfc-9f9d-11f1-a655-3497f65b111b">
    <topic>mod_gnutls -- multiple vulnerabilities</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
	<name>ap24-mod_gnutls</name>
	<range><lt>0.13.0</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>The mod_gnutls project reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://github.com/airtower-luna/mod_gnutls/releases/tag/mod_gnutls/0.13.0">
	  <p>Security fix (CVE-2026-33307): Fix out-of-bounds write when
	    receiving a client certificate chain longer than the buffer.</p>
	  <p>Security fix (CVE-2026-33308): Check Key Purpose during client
	    certificate verification.</p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-33307</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-33308</cvename>
      <url>https://github.com/airtower-luna/mod_gnutls/security/advisories/GHSA-gjpm-55p4-c76r</url>
      <url>https://github.com/airtower-luna/mod_gnutls/security/advisories/GHSA-hm2g-m958-8qgh</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-03-20</discovery>
      <entry>2026-08-24</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="0cb401f9-9f19-11f1-a655-3497f65b111b">
    <topic>jackson-databind -- multiple vulnerabilities</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
	<name>jackson-databind</name>
	<range><lt>2.22.2</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>The Jackson project reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://github.com/FasterXML/jackson-databind/blob/2.x/release-notes/VERSION-2.x">
	  <p>PolymorphicTypeValidator needs to validate generic type
	  parameters too</p>
	  <p>BasicPolymorphicTypeValidator setting allowIfSubTypeIsArray()
	  should validate element type</p>
	  <p>Add java.lang.Comparable in set of "unsafe" polymorphic base
	  types</p>
	  <p>@JsonView by-passed for @JsonUnwrapped Field/Setter
	  properties</p>
	  <p>@JsonView by-passed for some "setterless" creator
	  properties</p>
	  <p>@JsonView by-passed for unwrapped creator parameters</p>
	  <p>Honor @JsonView for external-type-id (EXTERNAL_PROPERTY)
	  properties</p>
	  <p>Renamed @JsonIgnore'd setters can deserialize via private
	  fields</p>
	  <p>@JsonIgnore on Record property ignored with
	  PropertyNamingStrategy</p>
	  <p>Case-insensitive deserialization may use wrong
	  @JsonIgnoreProperties</p>
	  <p>Do not allow DNS resolution when deserializing
	  InetAddress</p>
	  <p>Improve InetSocketAddress deserialization</p>
	  <p>Limit the supported URL schemes for java.nio.file.Path
	  deserialization</p>
	  <p>Add StreamReadConstraints number len constraint to
	  javax.xml.datatype.XMLGregorianCalendar and
	  javax.xml.datatype.Duration</p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-19032</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-54512</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-54513</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-54514</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-54515</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-54516</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-54517</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-54518</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-59888</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-59889</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-68497</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-77310</cvename>
      <url>https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-mhm7-754m-9p8w</url>
      <url>https://github.com/FasterXML/jackson-databind/blob/2.x/release-notes/VERSION-2.x</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-05-28</discovery>
      <entry>2026-08-23</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="0cb42b4a-9f19-11f1-a655-3497f65b111b">
    <topic>jackson-core -- StreamReadConstraints can be bypassed</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
	<name>jackson-core</name>
	<range><lt>2.22.2</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>The Jackson project reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://github.com/FasterXML/jackson-core/blob/2.x/release-notes/VERSION-2.x">
	  <p>Enforce maxNameLength incrementally in
	  ReaderBasedJsonParser</p>
	  <p>Fail parsing from DataInput if
	  StreamReadConstraints.getMaxDocumentLength() set</p>
	  <p>Fix maxDocumentLength bypass in async parser single
	  feedInput() case</p>
	  <p>Enforce StreamReadConstraints.maxNumberLength for
	  non-blocking (async) parser</p>
	  <p>UTF8DataInputJsonParser needs to enforce
	  StreamReadConstraints.maxNameLength limit</p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-68498</cvename>
      <url>https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-2m67-wjpj-xhg9</url>
      <url>https://github.com/FasterXML/jackson-core/blob/2.x/release-notes/VERSION-2.x</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-03-20</discovery>
      <entry>2026-08-23</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="b22fee3d-9f14-11f1-b948-5404a68ad561">
    <topic>traefik -- Multiple vulnerabilities</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
      <name>traefik</name>
      <range><lt>3.7.11</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
      <p>The traefik project releases a new version addressing multiple vulnerabilities:</p>
      <blockquote cite="https://github.com/traefik/traefik/releases/tag/v3.7.11">
      <ul>
      <li>GHSA-5w68-77r2-r64c (Complete authentication bypass in the `digestAuth` middleware)</li>
      <li>GHSA-g55h-rg46-x9c5 (TLS option confusion in multi-host routers can bypass mTLS for protected hosts)</li>
      <li>GHSA-j994-9gqj-9hwq (Same-host Ingress TLS option conflict disables client-certificate authentication)</li>
      <li>GHSA-m6wx-622r-48r9 (Kubernetes Ingress service middleware bypasses crossProviderNamespaces)</li>
      </ul>
      </blockquote>
      </body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <url>https://github.com/traefik/traefik/releases/tag/v3.7.11</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-08-19</discovery>
      <entry>2026-08-23</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="4496ae0c-9d7d-11f1-a655-3497f65b111b">
    <topic>terraform -- exclusion bypass in .terraformignore handling</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
	<name>terraform</name>
	<range><lt>1.15.9</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>HashiCorp reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://discuss.hashicorp.com/t/hcsec-2026-31-go-slug-vulnerable-to-exclusion-bypass-in-terraformignore-handling/77668">
	  <p>Terraform bundles the go-slug library, which builds the
	  archive uploaded to HCP Terraform or Terraform Enterprise
	  when a run is started.  In go-slug before v0.18.3, matching
	  of .terraformignore rules does not consistently treat
	  canonically equivalent Unicode filenames as the same path.
	  On filesystems that normalize filenames, a file whose
	  displayed name appears to match an exclusion rule can still
	  end up in the generated upload bundle, so local files an
	  operator intended to keep out of remote runs may be
	  transmitted.</p>
	  <p>Exploitation requires local control over the working
	  directory contents, use of .terraformignore, and filenames
	  and ignore patterns that differ only by Unicode
	  normalization form.  Setups that do not use
	  .terraformignore, use ASCII-only filenames and patterns, or
	  run on filesystems that do not perform this normalization
	  are not affected.</p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-14978</cvename>
      <url>https://discuss.hashicorp.com/t/hcsec-2026-31-go-slug-vulnerable-to-exclusion-bypass-in-terraformignore-handling/77668</url>
      <url>https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform/releases/tag/v1.15.9</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-08-20</discovery>
      <entry>2026-08-21</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="4bf4495e-9d4e-11f1-a129-901b0e9408dc">
    <topic>tailscale -- Insufficient validation of 4via6 subnet router destinations</topic>
    <affects>
<package>
<name>tailscale</name>
<range><lt>1.102.3</lt></range>
</package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>Tailscale team reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://tailscale.com/security-bulletins#ts-2026-011">
	  <p>Insufficient validation of 4via6 subnet router
	  destinations permitted access to host-scoped addresses,
	  including cloud metadata and loopback services. TS-2026-11</p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <url>https://tailscale.com/security-bulletins#ts-2026-011</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-08-18</discovery>
      <entry>2026-08-21</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="a188c081-9ce8-11f1-8fc6-cb9659fdabad">
    <topic>qt6-webengine -- multiple vulnerabilities</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
	<name>qt6-pdf</name>
	<name>qt6-webengine</name>
	<range><lt>6.11.2</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>Qt qtwebengine-chromium repo reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://code.qt.io/cgit/qt/qtwebengine-chromium.git/log/?h=140-based">
	  <p>Backports for 747 security bugs in Chromium:</p>
	  <ul>
	    <li>CVE-2026-1643: Use after free in Proxy</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-7934: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Popup Blocker</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-7943: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in ANGLE</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-7958: Inappropriate implementation in ServiceWorker</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-7962: Insufficient policy enforcement in DirectSockets</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-7979: Inappropriate implementation in Media</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-8000: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in ChromeDriver</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-8001: Use after free in Printing</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-8009: Inappropriate implementation in Cast</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-8010: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in SiteIsolation</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-8011: Insufficient policy enforcement in Search</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-8012: Inappropriate implementation in MHTML</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-8013: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in FedCM</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-8014: Inappropriate implementation in Preload</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-8015: Inappropriate implementation in Media</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-8016: Use after free in WebRTC</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-8017: Side-channel information leakage in Media</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-8020: Uninitialized Use in GPU</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-8022: Inappropriate implementation in MHTML</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-8510: Integer overflow in Skia</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-8511: Use after free in UI</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-8512: Use after free in FileSystem</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-8513: Use after free in Input</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-8514: Use after free in Aura</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-8515: Use after free in HID</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-8516: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in DataTransfer</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-8518: Use after free in Blink</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-8523: Use after free in Mojo</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-8524: Out of bounds write in WebAudio</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-8525: Heap buffer overflow in ANGLE</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-8526: Out of bounds write in WebRTC</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-8528: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in SiteIsolation</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-8529: Heap buffer overflow in Codecs</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-8530: Use after free in Network</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-8532: Integer overflow in XML</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-8533: Use after free in Accessibility</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-8534: Integer overflow in GPU</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-8535: Out of bounds read in Media</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-8537: Insufficient policy enforcement in ViewTransitions</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-8538: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in GPU</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-8539: Script injection in SanitizerAPI</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-8542: Use after free in Core</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-8543: Out of bounds read in FileSystem</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-8544: Use after free in Media</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-8545: Object corruption in Compositing</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-8546: Out of bounds read in GPU</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-8548: Out of bounds write in Media</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-8549: Use after free in Media</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-8552: Heap buffer overflow in GPU</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-8553: Use after free in GPU</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-8554: Type confusion in ANGLE</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-8556: Inappropriate implementation in ANGLE</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-8557: Use after free in Accessibility</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-8558: Out of bounds write in Fonts</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-8559: Integer overflow in Internationalization</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-8560: Heap buffer overflow in SwiftShader</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-8567: Integer overflow in ANGLE</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-8569: Out of bounds write in Codecs</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-8571: Insufficient policy enforcement in GPU</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-8573: Integer overflow in Codecs</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-8577: Integer overflow in Fonts</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-8578: Out of bounds read in GPU</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-8579: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Skia</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-8581: Use after free in GPU</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-8582: Object lifecycle issue in Dawn</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-8584: Inappropriate implementation in Views</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-8585: Inappropriate implementation in Media</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-9111: Use after free in WebRTC</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-9112: Use after free in GPU</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-9115: Insufficient policy enforcement in Service Worker</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-9116: Insufficient policy enforcement in ServiceWorker</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-9118: Use after free in XR</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-9119: Heap buffer overflow in WebRTC</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-9121: Out of bounds read in GPU</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-9122: Out of bounds read in GPU</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-9124: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Input</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-9126: Use after free in DOM</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-9872: Out of bounds write in GPU</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-9873: Use after free in Network</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-9875: Out of bounds read in WebGL</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-9876: Use after free in WebGL</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-9877: Use after free in ANGLE</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-9878: Use after free in ANGLE</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-9879: Out of bounds write in ANGLE</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-9880: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in WebGL</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-9881: Use after free in Bluetooth</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-9882: Integer overflow in ANGLE</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-9883: Use after free in Base</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-9885: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in UI</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-9886: Use after free in Base</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-9887: Use after free in Proxy</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-9889: Out of bounds read and write in Dawn</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-9890: Use after free in XR</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-9891: Use after free in Extensions</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-9892: Inappropriate implementation in Skia</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-9893: Use after free in Skia</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-9894: Use after free in GPU</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-9895: Out of bounds read in GPU</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-9896: Out of bounds write in V8</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-9897: Use after free in DOM</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-9899: Use after free in ANGLE</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-9900: Out of bounds write in ANGLE</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-9901: Use after free in ANGLE</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-9902: Use after free in Accessibility</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-9903: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Site Isolation</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-9904: Use after free in ANGLE</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-9906: Out of bounds write in GPU</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-9908: Out of bounds read in ANGLE</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-9909: Integer overflow in Skia</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-9910: Out of bounds memory access in ANGLE</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-9911: Integer overflow in ANGLE</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-9914: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in ANGLE</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-9915: Heap buffer overflow in ANGLE</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-9916: Out of bounds write in ANGLE</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-9918: Inappropriate implementation in Tint</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-9919: Out of bounds read in WebGL</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-9920: Uninitialized Use in GPU</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-9921: Uninitialized Use in WebGL</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-9922: Use after free in GPU</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-9924: Heap buffer overflow in ANGLE</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-9925: Use after free in ANGLE</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-9926: Heap buffer overflow in ANGLE</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-9927: Use after free in ANGLE</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-9928: Out of bounds read in ANGLE</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-9929: Inappropriate implementation in WebGL</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-9930: Out of bounds write in Dawn</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-9931: Use after free in GPU</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-9932: Use after free in ANGLE</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-9933: Use after free in Input</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-9934: Use after free in Aura</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-9935: Uninitialized Use in ANGLE</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-9936: Use after free in GFX</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-9937: Use after free in UI</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-9938: Inappropriate implementation in V8</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-9939: Heap buffer overflow in WebCodecs</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-9940: Heap buffer overflow in ANGLE</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-9941: Use after free in ANGLE</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-9942: Uninitialized Use in ANGLE</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-9943: Out of bounds read in WebGL</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-9944: Uninitialized Use in ANGLE</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-9945: Use after free in Media</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-9946: Use after free in ANGLE</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-9947: Use after free in XML</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-9948: Use after free in Views</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-9951: Use after free in UI</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-9953: Out of bounds read in ANGLE</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-9957: Use after free in PDF</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-9959: Race in WebRTC</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-9960: Integer overflow in PDFium</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-9962: Use after free in WebRTC</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-9964: Use after free in Bluetooth</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-9967: Out of bounds write in GPU</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-9968: Integer overflow in V8</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-9969: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in ANGLE</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-9970: Use after free in WebGL</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-9972: Uninitialized Use in Gamepad</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-9973: Out of bounds write in V8</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-9974: Out of bounds write in GPU</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-9975: Out of bounds read and write in ANGLE</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-9976: Inappropriate implementation in USB</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-9979: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Input</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-9981: Inappropriate implementation in Skia</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-9982: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in ANGLE</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-9983: Type confusion in Skia</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-9985: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Media</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-9988: Use after free in WebRTC</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-9989: Inappropriate implementation in Media</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-9992: Use after free in Network</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-9993: Use after free in Views</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-9994: Use after free in Core</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-9995: Use after free in WebXR</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-9996: Out of bounds read in WebRTC</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-9997: Use after free in Input</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-9998: Integer overflow in Skia</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-9999: Inappropriate implementation in ANGLE</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-10002: Use after free in PDFium</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-10003: Use after free in Views</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-10004: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Passwords</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-10006: Race in WebAudio</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-10007: Use after free in SVG</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-10008: Uninitialized Use in GPU</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-10009: Integer overflow in Skia</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-10011: Inappropriate implementation in Skia</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-10013: Use after free in WebCodecs</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-10016: Use after free in DOM</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-10017: Out of bounds read in Headless</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-10020: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Skia</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-10022: Type confusion in V8</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-10882: Use after free in Network</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-10883: Out of bounds write in ANGLE</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-10884: Use after free in Chromecas</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-10886: Use after free in FileSystem</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-10888: Use after free in Cast Streaming</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-10889: Out of bounds read in ANGLE</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-10890: Use after free in Cast</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-10891: Use after free in GFX</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-10892: Out of bounds write in GPU</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-10897: Out of bounds write in GPU</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-10905: Use after free in Network</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-10907: Out of bounds write in ANGLE</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-10908: Use after free in FullScreen</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-10909: Use after free in Dawn</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-10910: Type confusion in V8</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-10911: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Media</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-10912: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Extensions</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-10913: Use after free in ANGLE</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-10914: Use after free in ANGLE</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-10916: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in DevTools"</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-10917: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Media</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-10918: Use after free in Viz</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-10921: Integer overflow in Dawn</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-10925: Out of bounds write in Skia</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-10929: Heap buffer overflow in ANGLE</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-10930: Out of bounds read in ANGLE</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-10933: Use after free in Audio</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-10938: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Input</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-10939: Use after free in WebRTC</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-10942: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in UI</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-10945: Use after free in PDF</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-10946: Heap buffer overflow in Media</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-10947: Use after free in WebRTC</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-10948: Use after free in WebRTC</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-10949: Heap buffer overflow in Video</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-10953: Use after free in Core</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-10956: Use after free in MimeHandlerView</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-10959: Use after free in Input</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-10960: Uninitialized Use in Codecs</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-10963: Integer overflow in V8</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-10964: Integer overflow in V8</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-10965: Integer overflow in DevTools</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-10968: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Dawn</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-10969: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Extensions</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-10970: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in InterestGroups</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-10973: Uninitialized Use in Dawn</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-10974: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in ANGLE</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-10975: Use after free in WebRTC</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-10976: Uninitialized Use in Dawn</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-10977: Uninitialized Use in Skia</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-10979: Out of bounds read in ANGLE</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-10981: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Codecs</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-10982: Use after free in WebXR</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-10983: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Dawn</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-10985: Out of bounds read in Skia</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-10986: Integer overflow in Media</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-10987: Integer overflow in V8</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-10989: Inappropriate implementation in V8</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-10991: Use after free in V8</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-10992: Insufficient data validation in Animation</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-10994: Uninitialized Use in ANGLE</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-10996: Inappropriate implementation in Workers</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-10997: Insufficient policy enforcement in Extensions</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-10999: Out of bounds memory access in ANGLE</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-11000: Use after free in Fonts</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-11003: Use after free in WebRTC</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-11004: Out of bounds read in ANGLE</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-11005: Out of bounds read in ANGLE</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-11006: Out of bounds read in Dawn</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-11008: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in WebAppInstalls</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-11009: Use after free in USB</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-11011: Insufficient policy enforcement in Password Manager</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-11013: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Network</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-11014: Insufficient policy enforcement in Extensions</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-11015: Out of bounds read in WebGPU</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-11016: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Network</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-11020: Inappropriate implementation in Extensions</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-11021: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in GPU</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-11022: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in DevTools</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-11024: Stack buffer overflow in Skia</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-11026: Insufficient policy enforcement in Extensions</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-11029: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Drag and Drop</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-11030: Use after free in Network</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-11031: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Password Manager</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-11036: Inappropriate implementation in DOM</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-11037: Out of bounds write in Codecs</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-11038: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Subresource Integrity</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-11039: Uninitialized Use in Skia</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-11041: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Media</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-11042: Use after free in Views</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-11043: Out of bounds write in ANGLE</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-11044: Integer overflow in ANGLE</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-11045: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in GPU</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-11046: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Media</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-11047: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Base</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-11048: Inappropriate implementation in Extensions</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-11049: Use after free in Password Manager</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-11050: Use after free in V8</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-11051: Out of bounds read in ANGLE</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-11052: Type confusion in GPU</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-11053: Race condition in WebRTC</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-11054: Use after free in WebRTC</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-11055: Use after free in ANGLE</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-11056: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in SiteIsolation</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-11057: Uninitialized Use in Skia</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-11059: Use after free in Blink</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-11060: Use after free in Media</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-11061: Out of bounds read in ANGLE</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-11062: Insufficient policy enforcement in Extensions</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-11064: Uninitialized Use in GPU</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-11065: Use after free in ANGLE</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-11067: Uninitialized Use in Dawn</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-11068: Use after free in WebSockets</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-11071: Use after free in Base</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-11073: Use after free in WebGL</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-11074: Use after free in WebRTC</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-11075: Out of bounds read in V8</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-11076: Type confusion in CSS</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-11077: Out of bounds read in Dawn</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-11078: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in FileSystem</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-11079: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Codecs</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-11082: Use after free in GPU</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-11085: Integer overflow in GPU</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-11086: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Dawn</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-11087: Uninitialized Use in ANGLE</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-11088: Integer overflow in ANGLE</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-11089: Uninitialized Use in Media</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-11090: Uninitialized Use in ANGLE</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-11091: Inappropriate implementation in Dawn</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-11092: Insufficient policy enforcement in DevTools</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-11093: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Printing</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-11095: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Codecs</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-11096: Out of bounds read in WebRTC</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-11098: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in GPU</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-11099: Vulnerability in Skia</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-11101: Uninitialized Use in Dawn</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-11104: Uninitialized Use in ANGLE</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-11105: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in WebUI</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-11106: Inappropriate implementation in Media</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-11107: Inappropriate implementation in Downloads</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-11109: Uninitialized Use in ANGLE</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-11110: Uninitialized Use in ANGLE</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-11111: Out of bounds read in ANGLE</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-11113: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in ANGLE</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-11117: Use after free in Views</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-11118: Use after free in WebRTC</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-11119: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in GPU</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-11121: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Skia</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-11122: Inappropriate implementation in Keyboard</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-11123: Uninitialized Use in ANGLE</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-11124: Heap buffer overflow in Skia</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-11125: Use after free in Compositing</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-11126: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in DevTools</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-11128: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Web Share</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-11132: Policy bypass in Paint</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-11133: Insufficient policy enforcement in Paint</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-11134: Insufficient data validation in Media</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-11136: Use after free in Canvas</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-11137: Uninitialized Use in ANGLE</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-11138: Uninitialized Use in ANGLE</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-11139: Policy bypass in Paint</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-11141: Uninitialized Use in Audio</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-11142: Policy bypass in Paint</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-11143: Heap buffer overflow in Extensions</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-11152: Object lifecycle issue in Dawn</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-11153: Side-channel information leakage in Forms</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-11154: Use after free in Dawn</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-11155: Insufficient policy enforcement in CSS</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-11156: Inappropriate implementation in CSS</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-11159: Uninitialized Use in Skia</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-11160: Out of bounds read in Input</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-11161: Insufficient data validation in DataTransfer</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-11162: Insufficient policy enforcement in CSS</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-11164: Use after free in Blink</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-11166: Inappropriate implementation in SVG</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-11171: Integer overflow in Blink</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-11174: Insufficient policy enforcement in Site Isolation</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-11176: Inappropriate implementation in Media</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-11179: Inappropriate implementation in ORB</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-11181: Inappropriate implementation in Media Session</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-11182: Inappropriate implementation in SVG</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-11183: Out of bounds read in GWP-ASan</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-11185: Use after free in V8</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-11186: Inappropriate implementation in CSS</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-11189: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in DevTools</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-11190: Insufficient policy enforcement in Extensions</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-11191: Out of bounds memory access in ANGLE</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-11194: Inappropriate implementation in Network</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-11195: Inappropriate implementation in MHTML</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-11196: Type confusion in XML</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-11197: Insufficient policy enforcement in Workers</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-11198: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Codecs</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-11199: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in WebRTC</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-11200: Inappropriate implementation in WebRTC Medium</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-11201: Use after free in ServiceWorker</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-11206: Policy bypass in ServiceWorker</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-11207: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Autofill</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-11208: Use after free in Codecs</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-11209: Insufficient policy enforcement in Passwords</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-11211: Integer overflow in V8</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-11217: Insufficient policy enforcement in Fenced Frames</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-11218: Inappropriate implementation in PlatformIntegration</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-11219: Insufficient data validation in Navigation</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-11221: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in PointerLock</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-11223: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Network</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-11230: Use after free in Extensions</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-11233: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in FoldableAPIs</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-11235: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Compositing</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-11236: Insufficient policy enforcement in Web Bluetooth</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-11237: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Media</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-11238: Inappropriate implementation in DevTools</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-11240: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Loader</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-11244: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in WebAuthentication</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-11245: Inappropriate implementation in Payments</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-11246: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in IndexedDB</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-11249: Use after free in Network</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-11250: Inappropriate implementation in DevTools</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-11252: Policy bypass in Content Settings</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-11255: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Storage Access API</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-11256: Out of bounds read in GPU</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-11260: Policy bypass in Permissions</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-11264: Policy bypass in Content Security Policy</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-11266: Policy bypass in SafeBrowsing</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-11267: Insufficient policy enforcement in Extensions</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-11268: Uninitialized Use in ANGLE</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-11269: Inappropriate implementation in Extensions</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-11279: Out of bounds read in DevTools</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-11282: Policy bypass in Sandbox</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-11288: Policy bypass in CSS</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-11289: Side-channel information leakage in Paint</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-11292: Policy bypass in Blink</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-11293: Use after free in Input</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-11295: Inappropriate implementation in WebView</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-11296: Inappropriate implementation in ImageCapture</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-11303: Use after free in PDFium</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-11304: Use after free in PDFium</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-11305: Use after free in PDFium</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-11306: Use after free in PDFium</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-11307: Use after free in PDFium</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-11309: Insufficient policy enforcement in History</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-11633: Use after free in Bluetooth</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-11634: Use after free in Gamepad</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-11635: Use after free in Bluetooth</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-11640: Integer overflow in libyuv</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-11641: Use after free in Bluetooth</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-11645: Out of bounds memory access in V8</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-11648: Use after free in FullScreen</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-11649: Use after free in V8</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-11651: Use after free in Network</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-11652: Use after free in Network</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-11654: Use after free in CameraCapture</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-11655: Integer overflow in Media</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-11662: Type confusion in Bindings</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-11663: Use after free in Skia</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-11665: Out of bounds read in Dawn</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-11666: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Input</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-11667: Out of bounds read in WebRTC</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-11668: Uninitialized Use in Codecs</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-11669: Integer overflow in Media</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-11670: Use after free in PDF</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-11672: Out of bounds write in GPU</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-11673: Use after free in InterestGroups</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-11674: Use after free in Guest View</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-11675: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Skia</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-11676: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Dawn</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-11677: Race in Network</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-11678: Integer overflow in libyuv</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-11680: Use after free in Media</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-11683: Use after free in WebCodecs</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-11684: Insufficient policy enforcement in Network</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-11686: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Dawn</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-11688: Object lifecycle issue in SVG</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-11690: Out of bounds read and write in Media</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-11694: Use after free in ServiceWorker</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-11696: Uninitialized Use in Video</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-11697: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in UI</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-11698: Use after free in Bluetooth</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-11699: Use after free in Bluetooth</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-11700: Use after free in Tracing</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-12007: Use after free in Core</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-12009: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Accessibility</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-12010: Heap buffer overflow in GPU</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-12011: Use after free in WebMIDI</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-12012: Use after free Network</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-12013: Use after free Media</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-12016: Insufficient validation of untrusted input DevTools</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-12017: Insufficient validation of untrusted input Extensions</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-12018: Inappropriate implementation Mojo</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-12019: Out of bounds write Codecs</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-12023: Use after free GPU</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-12025: Insufficient validation of untrusted input Network</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-12026: Out of bounds read Video</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-12030: Heap buffer overflow GPU</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-12031: Inappropriate implementation Views</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-12033: Out of bounds read VideoCapture</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-12035: Use after free Views</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-12445: Use after free in Extensions</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-12446: Insufficient data validation in Passwords</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-12447: Heap buffer overflow in WebRTC</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-12450: Inappropriate implementation in Media</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-12453: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Input</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-12456: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Extensions</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-12459: Inappropriate implementation in Serial</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-12460: Insufficient policy enforcement in File System Access</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-12461: Out of bounds read in WebRTC</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-12462: Use after free in Media</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-12464: Use after free in Browser</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-12465: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Metrics</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-12466: Heap buffer overflow in WebRTC</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-13023: Uninitialized Use in GPU</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-13024: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Navigation</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-13027: Use after free in FileSystem</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-13028: Use after free in WebGL</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-13029: Use after free in Web Authentication</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-13031: Use after free in Blink</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-13032: Use after free in WebGL</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-13033: Out of bounds read in Blink>InterestGroups</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-13034: Inappropriate implementation in Passwords</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-13035: Use after free in Bluetooth</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-13281: Integer overflow in Mojo</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-13775: Use after free in GPU</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-13776: Type confusion in Dawn</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-13778: Use after free in WebUSB</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-13780: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in ANGLE</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-13783: Use after free in Views</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-13784: Use after free in Views</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-13785: Use after free in Bluetooth</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-13790: Side-channel information leakage in Scroll</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-13791: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Downloads</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-13793: Insufficient policy enforcement in SVG</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-13799: Use after free in QUIC</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-13802: Use after free in Views</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-13806: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Accessibility</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-13810: Inappropriate implementation in Input</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-13811: Use after free in IME</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-13814: Use after free in Views</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-13819: Out of bounds read in ANGLE</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-13824: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Extensions</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-13825: Uninitialized Use in Dawn</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-13833: Uninitialized Use in ANGLE</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-13834: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in ANGLE</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-13835: Inappropriate implementation in XML</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-13836: Inappropriate implementation in CSS</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-13837: Inappropriate implementation in CSS</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-13841: Integer overflow in Skia</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-13845: Use after free in DOM</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-13846: Use after free in USB</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-13848: Use after free in Forms</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-13857: Inappropriate implementation in Geometry</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-13858: Out of bounds read in FFmpeg</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-13859: Inappropriate implementation in ANGLE</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-13861: Use after free in Core</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-13869: Use after free in Device</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-13871: Insufficient data validation in GuestView</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-13873: Out of bounds memory access in Layout</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-13875: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in GPU</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-13876: Inappropriate implementation in Network</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-13877: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in ANGLE</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-13878: Use after free in Bluetooth</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-13879: Use after free in Bluetooth</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-13880: Use after free in USB</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-13882: Inappropriate implementation in USB</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-13883: Type confusion in ANGLE</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-13886: Policy bypass in Isolated Web Apps</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-13891: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Extensions</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-13893: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in WebUI</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-13899: Use after free in HTML</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-13901: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Serial</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-13903: Insufficient policy enforcement in Bluetooth</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-13906: Out of bounds read in Codecs</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-13909: Insufficient policy enforcement in DevTools</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-13910: Insufficient policy enforcement in WebXR</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-13919: Insufficient data validation in Extensions</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-13920: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Media</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-13922: Side-channel information leakage in Paint</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-13923: Uninitialized Use in GPU</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-13925: Inappropriate implementation in Downloads</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-13931: Inappropriate implementation in Media</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-13934: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Dawn</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-13935: Side-channel information leakage in ComputePressure</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-13938: Integer overflow in Fonts</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-13942: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Video Capture</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-13943: Uninitialized Use in CSS</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-13944: Inappropriate implementation in DataTransfe</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-13947: Uninitialized Use in XR</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-13950: Uninitialized Use in GPU</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-13951: Policy bypass in USB</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-13952: Inappropriate implementation in PerformanceAPIs</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-13954: Insufficient policy enforcement in XML</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-13958: Uninitialized Use in Codecs</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-13959: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Blink</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-13961: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in DevTools</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-13965: Use after free in Oilpan</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-13966: Inappropriate implementation in History</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-13969: Uninitialized Use in UI</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-13970: Uninitialized Use in Media</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-13971: Uninitialized Use in Skia</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-13972: Inappropriate implementation in Paint</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-13975: Out of bounds read in ANGLE</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-13976: Heap buffer overflow in Storage</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-13977: Inappropriate implementation in HTMLParser</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-13979: Inappropriate implementation in Paint</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-13988: Inappropriate implementation in Paint</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-13992: Inappropriate implementation in UI</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-13998: Incorrect security UI in File Input</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-13999: Inappropriate implementation in Extensions</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-14001: Inappropriate implementation in Network</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-14002: Inappropriate implementation in Geolocation</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-14003: Insufficient policy enforcement in Extensions</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-14004: Inappropriate implementation in CSS</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-14006: Use after free in Navigation</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-14008: Uninitialized Use in WebXR</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-14009: Insufficient data validation in Passwords</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-14010: Uninitialized Use in Codecs</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-14011: Out of bounds read in SurfaceCapture</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-14012: Side-channel information leakage in CSS</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-14013: Inappropriate implementation in SVG</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-14015: Inappropriate implementation in WebRTC</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-14016: Insufficient policy enforcement in SVG</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-14017: Inappropriate implementation in Navigation</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-14020: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in WebXR</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-14022: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Network</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-14023: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in SanitizerAPI</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-14025: Use after free in Views</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-14032: Use after free in Bluetooth</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-14034: Inappropriate implementation in WebXR</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-14035: Insufficient policy enforcement in Bluetooth</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-14036: Insufficient policy enforcement in Bluetooth</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-14037: Insufficient policy enforcement in GPU</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-14039: Insufficient policy enforcement in GetUserMedia</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-14040: Use after free in BrowserTag</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-14043: Use after free in GetUserMedia</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-14044: Use after free in ANGLE</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-14384: Out of bounds read in ANGLE</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-14385: Heap buffer overflow in ANGLE</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-14386: Out of bounds read in ANGLE</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-14388: Out of bounds read in ANGLE</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-14389: Integer overflow in Skia</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-14390: Use after free in ANGLE</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-14391: Integer overflow in ANGLE</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-14392: Out of bounds write in Tint</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-14393: Use after free in V8</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-14396: Out of bounds read in ANGLE</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-14397: Out of bounds write in ANGLE</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-14398: Use after free in ANGLE</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-14399: Uninitialized Use in Dawn</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-14400: Out of bounds write in ANGLE</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-14401: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in ANGLE</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-14402: Uninitialized Use in ANGLE</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-14404: Inappropriate implementation in PDFium</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-14406: Out of bounds read in V8</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-14407: Inappropriate implementation in V8</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-14408: Uninitialized Use in Dawn</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-14411: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in ANGLE</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-14412: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in ANGLE</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-14413: Uninitialized Use in ANGLE</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-14414: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Skia</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-14417: Use after free in Dawn</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-14418: Uninitialized Use in ANGLE</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-14420: Out of bounds read and write in Dawn</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-14421: Uninitialized Use in Dawn</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-14422: Out of bounds read and write in Tint</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-14426: Use after free in V8</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-14427: Heap buffer overflow in Skia</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-14428: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Dawn</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-14429: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Skia</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-14430: Integer overflow in V8</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-14431: Type confusion in V8</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-14432: Use after free in V8</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-15107: Use after free in IndexedDB</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-15109: Uninitialized Use in ANGLE</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-15114: Out of bounds read and write in Codecs</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-15118: Use after free in Input</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-15119: Inappropriate implementation in GetUserMedia</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-15121: Use after free in WebRTC</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-15123: Insufficient data validation in DOM</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-15125: Inappropriate implementation / Use after free in Forms</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-15126: Inappropriate implementation / Use after free in Forms</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-15127: Inappropriate implementation in WebGL</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-15128: Inappropriate implementation / Use after free in Forms</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-15132: Uninitialized Use in V8</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-15133: Use after free in InterestGroups</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-15766: Uninitialized Use in Skia</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-15767: Heap buffer overflow in libyuv</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-15770: Uninitialized Use in V8</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-15771: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Media</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-15772: Use after free in GPU</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-15773: Use after free in Core</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-15774: Use after free in Skia</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-15775: Insufficient policy enforcement in V8</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-15776: Type confusion in V8</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-15778: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Navigation</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-15899: Use after free in CameraCapture</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-15900: Use after free in GPU</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-15901: Use after free in Network</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-15903: Out of bounds read and write in V8</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-15905: Use after free in Aura</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-16413: Out of bounds write in ANGLE</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-16417: Uninitialized Use in Skia</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-16418: Stack buffer overflow in V8</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-16419: Out of bounds read and write in ANGLE</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-16420: Type confusion in WebAudio/Inappropriate Implementation in WebAudio</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-16421: Type confusion in WebAudio/Inappropriate Implementation in WebAudio</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-16422: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Certificate</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-16423: Use after free in UI</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-16424: Use after free in GPU</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-16804: Use after free in Input</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-16805: Use after free in Blink</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-16807: Out of bounds write in Codecs</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-17650: Use after free in Compositing</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-17651: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Dawn</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-17653: Use after free in Skia</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-17657: Use after free in Navigation</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-17658: Use after free in V8</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-17659: Inappropriate implementation in SiteIsolation</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-17664: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Loader</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-17665: Use after free in V8</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-17668: Uninitialized Use in ANGLE</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-17671: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in ANGLE</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-17673: Integer overflow in QUIC</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-17676: Inappropriate implementation in ANGLE</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-17689: Uninitialized Use in ANGLE</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-17691: Out of bounds write in ANGLE</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-17692: Use after free in DataTransfer</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-17695: Inappropriate implementation in ANGLE</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-17701: Out of bounds read in ANGLE</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-17702: Inappropriate implementation in Skia</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-17704: Use after free in ANGLE</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-17709: Race in Downloads</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-17710: Inappropriate implementation in MHTML</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-17713: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Accessibility</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-17717: Integer overflow in ANGLE</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-17718: Use after free in ANGLE</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-17721: Out of bounds write in ANGLE</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-19140: Use after free in GPU</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-19141: Use after free in Resources</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-19146: Uninitialized Use in GPU</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-19147: Use after free in Aura</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-19148: Out of bounds write in GPU</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-19149: Use after free in Aura</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-19150: Inappropriate implementation in V8</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-19151: Use after free in V8</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-19152: Inappropriate implementation in Navigation</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-19153: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Workers</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-19154: Use after free in Skia</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-19156: Heap buffer overflow in Base</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-19157: Out of bounds write in ANGLE</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-19160: Uninitialized Use in Skia</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-19161: Uninitialized Use in Skia</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-19162: Out of bounds write in V8</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-19163: Use after free in Media</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-19164: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Codecs</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-19165: Use after free in Extensions</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-19167: Integer overflow in GPU</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-19168: Inappropriate implementation in V8</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-19172: Use after free in View</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-19174: Integer overflow in V8</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-19176: Use after free in Skia</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-25210: Integer overflow in XML</li>
	  </ul>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-1643</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-7934</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-7943</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-7958</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-7962</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-7979</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-8000</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-8001</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-8009</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-8010</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-8011</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-8012</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-8013</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-8014</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-8015</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-8016</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-8017</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-8020</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-8022</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-8510</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-8511</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-8512</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-8513</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-8514</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-8515</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-8516</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-8518</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-8523</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-8524</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-8525</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-8526</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-8528</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-8529</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-8530</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-8532</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-8533</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-8534</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-8535</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-8537</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-8538</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-8539</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-8542</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-8543</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-8544</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-8545</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-8546</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-8548</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-8549</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-8552</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-8553</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-8554</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-8556</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-8557</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-8558</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-8559</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-8560</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-8567</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-8569</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-8571</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-8573</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-8577</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-8578</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-8579</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-8581</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-8582</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-8584</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-8585</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-9111</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-9112</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-9115</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-9116</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-9118</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-9119</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-9121</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-9122</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-9124</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-9126</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-9872</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-9873</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-9875</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-9876</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-9877</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-9878</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-9879</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-9880</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-9881</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-9882</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-9883</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-9885</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-9886</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-9887</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-9889</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-9890</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-9891</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-9892</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-9893</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-9894</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-9895</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-9896</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-9897</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-9899</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-9900</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-9901</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-9902</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-9903</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-9904</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-9906</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-9908</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-9909</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-9910</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-9911</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-9914</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-9915</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-9916</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-9918</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-9919</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-9920</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-9921</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-9922</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-9924</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-9925</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-9926</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-9927</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-9928</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-9929</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-9930</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-9931</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-9932</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-9933</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-9934</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-9935</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-9936</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-9937</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-9938</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-9939</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-9940</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-9941</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-9942</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-9943</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-9944</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-9945</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-9946</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-9947</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-9948</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-9951</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-9953</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-9957</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-9959</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-9960</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-9962</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-9964</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-9967</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-9968</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-9969</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-9970</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-9972</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-9973</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-9974</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-9975</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-9976</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-9979</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-9981</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-9982</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-9983</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-9985</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-9988</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-9989</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-9992</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-9993</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-9994</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-9995</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-9996</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-9997</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-9998</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-9999</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-10002</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-10003</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-10004</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-10006</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-10007</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-10008</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-10009</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-10011</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-10013</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-10016</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-10017</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-10020</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-10022</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-10882</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-10883</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-10884</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-10886</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-10888</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-10889</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-10890</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-10891</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-10892</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-10897</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-10905</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-10907</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-10908</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-10909</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-10910</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-10911</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-10912</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-10913</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-10914</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-10916</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-10917</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-10918</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-10921</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-10925</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-10929</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-10930</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-10933</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-10938</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-10939</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-10942</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-10945</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-10946</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-10947</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-10948</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-10949</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-10953</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-10956</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-10959</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-10960</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-10963</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-10964</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-10965</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-10968</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-10969</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-10970</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-10973</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-10974</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-10975</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-10976</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-10977</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-10979</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-10981</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-10982</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-10983</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-10985</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-10986</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-10987</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-10989</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-10991</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-10992</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-10994</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-10996</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-10997</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-10999</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11000</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11003</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11004</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11005</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11006</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11008</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11009</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11011</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11013</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11014</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11015</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11016</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11020</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11021</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11022</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11024</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11026</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11029</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11030</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11031</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11036</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11037</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11038</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11039</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11041</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11042</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11043</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11044</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11045</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11046</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11047</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11048</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11049</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11050</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11051</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11052</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11053</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11054</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11055</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11056</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11057</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11059</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11060</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11061</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11062</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11064</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11065</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11067</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11068</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11071</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11073</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11074</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11075</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11076</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11077</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11078</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11079</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11082</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11085</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11086</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11087</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11088</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11089</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11090</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11091</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11092</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11093</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11095</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11096</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11098</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11099</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11101</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11104</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11105</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11106</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11107</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11109</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11110</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11111</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11113</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11117</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11118</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11119</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11121</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11122</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11123</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11124</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11125</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11126</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11128</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11132</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11133</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11134</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11136</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11137</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11138</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11139</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11141</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11142</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11143</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11152</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11153</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11154</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11155</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11156</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11159</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11160</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11161</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11162</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11164</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11166</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11171</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11174</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11176</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11179</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11181</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11182</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11183</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11185</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11186</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11189</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11190</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11191</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11194</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11195</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11196</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11197</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11198</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11199</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11200</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11201</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11206</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11207</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11208</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11209</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11211</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11217</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11218</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11219</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11221</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11223</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11230</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11233</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11235</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11236</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11237</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11238</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11240</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11244</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11245</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11246</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11249</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11250</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11252</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11255</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11256</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11260</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11264</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11266</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11267</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11268</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11269</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11279</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11282</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11288</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11289</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11292</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11293</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11295</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11296</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11303</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11304</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11305</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11306</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11307</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11309</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11633</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11634</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11635</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11640</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11641</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11645</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11648</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11649</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11651</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11652</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11654</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11655</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11662</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11663</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11665</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11666</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11667</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11668</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11669</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11670</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11672</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11673</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11674</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11675</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11676</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11677</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11678</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11680</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11683</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11684</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11686</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11688</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11690</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11694</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11696</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11697</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11698</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11699</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11700</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-12007</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-12009</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-12010</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-12011</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-12012</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-12013</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-12016</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-12017</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-12018</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-12019</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-12023</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-12025</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-12026</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-12030</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-12031</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-12033</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-12035</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-12445</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-12446</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-12447</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-12450</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-12453</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-12456</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-12459</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-12460</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-12461</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-12462</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-12464</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-12465</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-12466</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13023</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13024</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13027</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13028</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13029</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13031</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13032</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13033</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13034</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13035</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13281</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13775</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13776</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13778</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13780</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13783</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13784</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13785</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13790</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13791</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13793</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13799</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13802</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13806</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13810</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13811</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13814</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13819</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13824</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13825</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13833</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13834</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13835</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13836</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13837</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13841</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13845</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13846</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13848</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13857</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13858</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13859</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13861</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13869</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13871</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13873</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13875</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13876</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13877</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13878</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13879</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13880</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13882</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13883</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13886</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13891</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13893</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13899</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13901</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13903</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13906</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13909</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13910</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13919</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13920</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13922</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13923</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13925</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13931</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13934</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13935</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13938</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13942</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13943</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13944</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13947</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13950</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13951</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13952</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13954</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13958</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13959</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13961</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13965</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13966</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13969</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13970</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13971</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13972</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13975</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13976</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13977</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13979</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13988</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13992</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13998</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13999</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-14001</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-14002</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-14003</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-14004</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-14006</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-14008</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-14009</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-14010</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-14011</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-14012</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-14013</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-14015</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-14016</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-14017</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-14020</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-14022</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-14023</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-14025</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-14032</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-14034</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-14035</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-14036</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-14037</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-14039</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-14040</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-14043</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-14044</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-14384</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-14385</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-14386</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-14388</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-14389</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-14390</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-14391</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-14392</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-14393</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-14396</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-14397</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-14398</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-14399</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-14400</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-14401</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-14402</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-14404</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-14406</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-14407</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-14408</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-14411</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-14412</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-14413</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-14414</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-14417</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-14418</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-14420</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-14421</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-14422</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-14426</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-14427</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-14428</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-14429</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-14430</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-14431</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-14432</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-15107</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-15109</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-15114</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-15118</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-15119</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-15121</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-15123</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-15125</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-15126</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-15127</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-15128</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-15132</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-15133</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-15766</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-15767</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-15770</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-15771</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-15772</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-15773</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-15774</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-15775</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-15776</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-15778</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-15899</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-15900</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-15901</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-15903</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-15905</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-16413</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-16417</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-16418</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-16419</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-16420</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-16421</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-16422</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-16423</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-16424</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-16804</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-16805</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-16807</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17650</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17651</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17653</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17657</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17658</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17659</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17664</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17665</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17668</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17671</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17673</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17676</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17689</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17691</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17692</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17695</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17701</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17702</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17704</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17709</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17710</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17713</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17717</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17718</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17721</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-19140</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-19141</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-19146</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-19147</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-19148</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-19149</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-19150</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-19151</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-19152</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-19153</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-19154</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-19156</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-19157</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-19160</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-19161</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-19162</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-19163</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-19164</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-19165</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-19167</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-19168</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-19172</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-19174</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-19176</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-25210</cvename>
      <url>https://code.qt.io/cgit/qt/qtwebengine-chromium.git/log/?h=140-based</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-05-13</discovery>
      <entry>2026-08-20</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="d14c86b6-9ca3-11f1-bf98-a8a1599412c6">
    <topic>chromium -- security fixes</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
       <name>chromium</name>
       <range><lt>151.0.7922.169</lt></range>
      </package>
      <package>
       <name>ungoogled-chromium</name>
       <range><lt>151.0.7922.169</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
       <p>Chrome Releases reports:</p>
       <blockquote cite="https://chromereleases.googleblog.com/2026/08/stable-channel-update-for-desktop_0826575033.html">
	 <p>This update includes 15 security fixes:</p>
	 <ul>
	    <li>[534923522] Critical CVE-2026-76034: Buffer overflow in WebGL.</li>
	    <li>[540087398] Critical CVE-2026-76036: Buffer overflow in Dawn.</li>
	    <li>[516715010] High CVE-2026-76033: Inappropriate implementation in CORS.</li>
	    <li>[517612295] High CVE-2026-76037: Link following in CredentialProvider.</li>
	    <li>[522732244] High CVE-2026-76044: Race condition in USB.</li>
	    <li>[525167753] High CVE-2026-76039: Incorrect reference resolution in Core.</li>
	    <li>[534862220] High CVE-2026-76040: Use after free in Browser.</li>
	    <li>[536439844] High CVE-2026-76035: Inappropriate implementation in Media.</li>
	    <li>[536460270] High CVE-2026-76042: Use of uninitialized resource in GPU.</li>
	    <li>[536581050] High CVE-2026-76046: Buffer overflow in ANGLE.</li>
	    <li>[539350801] High CVE-2026-76043: Incorrect calculation in V8.</li>
	    <li>[540027341] High CVE-2026-76041: Information leak in Skia.</li>
	    <li>[541251902] High CVE-2026-76047: Type confusion in V8.</li>
	    <li>[541926503] High CVE-2026-76038: Type confusion in V8.</li>
	    <li>[543082390] High CVE-2026-76045: Use after free in WebGL.</li>
	 </ul>
       </blockquote>
      </body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-76034</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-76036</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-76033</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-76037</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-76044</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-76039</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-76040</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-76035</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-76042</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-76046</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-76043</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-76041</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-76047</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-76038</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-76045</cvename>
      <url>https://chromereleases.googleblog.com/2026/08/stable-channel-update-for-desktop_0826575033.html</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-08-18</discovery>
      <entry>2026-08-20</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="e6a17802-cda9-4f53-8870-b629e4ac3d40">
    <topic>zeek -- multiple vulnerabilities</topic>
    <affects>
<package>
<name>zeek</name>
<range><lt>8.0.10</lt></range>
</package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>Tim Wojtulewicz of Corelight reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://github.com/zeek/zeek/releases/tag/v8.0.10">
	  <p> HIGH: SMB: Chains of AndX messages can crash Zeek </p>
	  <p> HIGH: DNP3: Memory exhaustion via file control (g70v1)
	  fields </p>
	  <p> HIGH: SIP: Memory exhaustion from long request/response
	  paths </p>
	  <p> HIGH: DHCP: Memory exhaustion from retained options
	  after analyzer violation </p>
	  <p> HIGH: SMTP: Memory exhaustion from large numbers of
	  rcptto/to/cc/path entries </p>
	  <p> HIGH: SMB: DCE/RPC memory exhaustion from fragment
	  state </p>
	  <p> HIGH: Analyzer manager: Equivalent scheduled analyzers
	  could exhaust memory </p>
	  <p> HIGH: ZIP: Unbounded decompression </p>
	  <p> HIGH: Redis: Parsed Redis traffic memory exhaustion
	  </p>
	  <p> HIGH: Invalid IPv6 fragments can lead to unbounded
	  state growth </p>
	  <p> HIGH: SSH: Quadratic KEX algorithm CPU exhaustion
	  </p>
	  <p> HIGH: NVT: Oversized line recovery writes before heap
	  buffer </p>
	  <p> HIGH: DHCP: Unbounded state growth via join_data </p>
	  <p> HIGH: FTP: Unbounded state growth via ftp_data_expected
	  </p>
	  <p> HIGH: OCSP: Empty byName responder ID crashes Zeek </p>
	  <p> HIGH: ARP: Tunneled ARP traffic crashes Zeek </p>
	  <p> HIGH: LDAP: Unbounded per-connection script state </p>
	  <p> HIGH: IRC DCC SEND has unbounded state growth </p>
	  <p> HIGH: tunnel_changed event limit bypass on direct/tunneled
	  toggles </p>
	  <p> HIGH: Recursive stack exhaustion from deep packet
	  analyzer chains </p>
	  <p> MEDIUM: Telnet: AUTH STATUS options before a NAME is
	  received results in event argument mismatch </p>
	  <p> MEDIUM: UDP: udp_contents events could trigger
	  out-of-bounds reads </p>
	  <p> MEDIUM: NetBIOS: Memory exhaustion from declared
	  session lengths </p>
	  <p> MEDIUM: IRC: Single DCC Send packet can result in
	  scripting error </p>
	  <p> MEDIUM: IRC: Invalid DCC Send host/port fields can
	  lead to unexpected parsing results </p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <url>https://github.com/zeek/zeek/releases/tag/v8.0.10</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-08-19</discovery>
      <entry>2026-08-19</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="01c15468-9b7b-11f1-a75c-589cfc10a551">
    <topic>podman -- podman quadlet install --replace does not fully replace the old file</topic>
    <affects>
	<package>
	<name>podman</name>
	<range><ge>5.7.0</ge><lt>5.8.6</lt></range>
	</package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>The Podman developers report:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://github.com/podman-container-tools/podman/security/advisories/GHSA-fx76-2j3w-2mx6">
	  <p>When running podman quadlet install --replace to replace a
	   Quadlet file, if the original Quadlet is larger than the new
	   Quadlet, the file would not be truncated and content from the
	   original would be preserved.</p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-19730</cvename>
      <url>https://github.com/podman-container-tools/podman/releases/tag/v5.8.6</url>
      <url>https://github.com/podman-container-tools/podman/security/advisories/GHSA-fx76-2j3w-2mx6</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-08-13</discovery>
      <entry>2026-08-18</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="3a65fb7e-9ac2-11f1-bdc8-2cf05da270f3">
    <topic>Gitlab -- Vulnerabilities</topic>
    <affects>
<package>
	<name>gitlab-ce</name>
	<name>gitlab-ee</name>
	<range><ge>19.2.0</ge><lt>19.2.4</lt></range>
	<range><ge>19.1.0</ge><lt>19.1.6</lt></range>
	<range><ge>18.11.10</ge><lt>19.0.8</lt></range>
</package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>Gitlab reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://docs.gitlab.com/releases/patches/patch-release-gitlab-19-2-4-released/?nav=19.2.4">
	  <p>Code Injection issue via GraphQL directive impacts GitLab CE/EE</p>
	  <p>Cross-Site Request Forgery issue in GraphQL multiplex query handler impacts GitLab CE/EE</p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-19478</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-19650</cvename>
      <url>https://docs.gitlab.com/releases/patches/patch-release-gitlab-19-2-4-released/?nav=19.2.4</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-08-17</discovery>
      <entry>2026-08-18</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="2f3568eb-999e-11f1-a655-3497f65b111b">
    <topic>gitea -- Multiple vulnerabilities</topic>
    <affects>
    <package>
    <name>gitea</name>
    <range><lt>1.27.0</lt></range>
    </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>Gitea reports</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://blog.gitea.com/release-of-1.27.0/">
	<p>This release contains fixes for 45 security issues,
	including privilege escalation, remote denial of service,
	server-side request forgery, authorization and token scope
	bypasses, and information disclosure vulnerabilities.
	Please upgrade as soon as possible.
	</p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-23603</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-42931</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-50105</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-54481</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-55982</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-55984</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-55986</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-55987</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-56443</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-56654</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-56657</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-56750</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-56755</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-57886</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-57894</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-57897</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-58314</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-58416</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-58417</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-58420</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-58425</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-58427</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-58428</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-58429</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-58431</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-58432</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-58433</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-58434</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-58435</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-58436</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-58437</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-58438</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-58439</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-58440</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-58441</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-58442</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-58443</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-58444</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-58445</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-58507</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-58508</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-58510</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-58511</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-59763</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-59765</cvename>
      <url>https://blog.gitea.com/release-of-1.27.0/</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-07-13</discovery>
      <entry>2026-08-16</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="05d311bc-9991-11f1-bc50-6cc21735f730">
    <topic>PostgreSQL -- Multiple vulnerabilities</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
       <name>postgresql14-server</name>
       <range><lt>14.24</lt></range>
      </package>
      <package>
       <name>postgresql15-server</name>
       <range><lt>15.19</lt></range>
      </package>
      <package>
       <name>postgresql16-server</name>
       <range><lt>16.15</lt></range>
      </package>
      <package>
       <name>postgresql17-server</name>
       <range><lt>17.11</lt></range>
      </package>
      <package>
       <name>postgresql18-server</name>
       <range><lt>18.6</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>The PostgreSQL project reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://www.postgresql.org/about/news/postgresql-186-1711-1615-1519-1424-and-19-beta-3-released-3365/">
	<p>
	  CVE-2026-6464: psql COPY FROM STDIN, if the copy fails
	  before data rows begin, processes the following data lines
	  as psql commands.
	</p>
	<p>
	  CVE-2026-6469: ALTER TABLE ALTER TYPE incorrectly reassigns
	  ownership of dependent extended statistics objects to the
	  current user.
	</p>
	<p>
	  CVE-2026-6470: Missing privilege check for type USAGE allows
	  denial of service against ALTER and DROP of the type.
	</p>
	<p>
	  CVE-2026-6471: Logical decoding lets a REPLICATION-
	  privileged user dlopen an arbitrary file via the decoding
	  plugin choice, running arbitrary code as the server's OS
	  user.
	</p>
	<p>
	  CVE-2026-14662: Integer wraparound in tsvector and tsquery
	  functions can undersize an allocation, causing a buffer
	  overflow and arbitrary code execution.
	</p>
	<p>
	  CVE-2026-14663: pgcrypto silently encrypts to and decrypts
	  from cleartext for ciphers OpenSSL has disabled, letting an
	  attacker recover cleartext.
	</p>
	<p>
	  CVE-2026-14664: Heap buffer overflow in the regexp engine
	  allows arbitrary code execution via crafted input text.
	</p>
	<p>
	  CVE-2026-14666: Row-level security policy caching can retain
	  a stale policy after role changes, letting a user complete
	  now-forbidden reads or writes.
	</p>
	<p>
	  CVE-2026-14668: Type confusion in the ctid selectivity
	  estimator discloses a derivative of an arbitrary 4-byte span
	  of server memory.
	</p>
	<p>
	  CVE-2026-14669: Heap buffer overflow in to_char(timestamptz)
	  via a long POSIX timezone abbreviation allows arbitrary code
	  execution.
	</p>
	<p>
	  CVE-2026-14670: Heap buffer overflow in plperl, on return of
	  a tied hash, allows the function owner to execute arbitrary
	  code.
	</p>
	<p>
	  CVE-2026-14671: Type confusion in module "refint" allows an
	  object creator to execute arbitrary code.
	</p>
	<p>
	  CVE-2026-14672: SCRAM authentication reveals whether a role
	  exists via an observable difference in the reported
	  iteration count.
	</p>
	<p>
	  CVE-2026-14673: amcheck fails to clear an untrusted search
	  path, letting an EXECUTE grantee run arbitrary functions as
	  an expression index's owner.
	</p>
	<p>
	  CVE-2026-14676: Heap buffer overflow in pg_stat_statements
	  via crafted queries with array constants allows arbitrary
	  code execution.
	</p>
	<p>
	  CVE-2026-14677: Integer wraparound in 32-bit pltcl/plperl
	  builds can undersize an allocation, allowing arbitrary code
	  execution.
	</p>
	<p>
	  CVE-2026-14678: pg_trgm's picksplit function reads past the
	  end of a heap buffer, potentially disclosing limited memory.
	</p>
	<p>
	  CVE-2026-14679: Stack buffer overflow in argument-name
	  matching lets an object creator write a few attacker-
	  influenced bytes into server memory.
	</p>
	<p>
	  CVE-2026-14680: Type confusion via "internal"-typed function
	  arguments allows any user to execute arbitrary code.
	</p>
	<p>
	  CVE-2026-14681: GSSAPI encryption is not properly enforced
	  when coupled with an initial direct SSL connection.
	</p>
	<p>
	  CVE-2026-15741: Expression deparse of EXTRACT() allows SQL
	  injection via a hostile object definition, affecting pg_dump
	  and psql.
	</p>
	<p>
	  CVE-2026-15742: Integer wraparound in fuzzystrmatch's
	  levenshtein() functions allows writes to arbitrary addresses
	  and code execution.
	</p>
	<p>
	  CVE-2026-16238: Type confusion in
	  pg_restore_attribute_stats() allows arbitrary code execution
	  via conflated range/multirange values.
	</p>
	<p>
	  CVE-2026-16239: Type confusion via cursor DECLARE and CLOSE
	  allows a user to execute arbitrary code.
	</p>
	<p>
	  CVE-2026-16241: Integer underflow in ECPG can crash the
	  client via a bytea value lacking its mandatory prefix.
	</p>
	<p>
	  CVE-2026-18024: The ascii() function reads past the end of a
	  buffer, disclosing a few bytes of server memory.
	</p>
	<p>
	  CVE-2026-18408: psql's \unrestrict lets a malicious pg_dump
	  origin-server superuser execute arbitrary code in the
	  restoring client.
	</p>
	<p>
	  CVE-2026-19385: Heap buffer overflow in pg_dump, when
	  dumping long function transform lists, allows arbitrary code
	  execution.
	</p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-6464</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-6469</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-6470</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-6471</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-14662</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-14663</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-14664</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-14666</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-14668</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-14669</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-14670</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-14671</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-14672</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-14673</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-14676</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-14677</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-14678</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-14679</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-14680</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-14681</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-15741</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-15742</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-16238</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-16239</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-16241</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-18024</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-18408</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-19385</cvename>
      <url>https://www.postgresql.org/about/news/postgresql-186-1711-1615-1519-1424-and-19-beta-3-released-3365/</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-08-13</discovery>
      <entry>2026-08-16</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="56449320-97c5-11f1-84d7-3c7c3fba4204">
    <topic>OpenEXR -- 3.4.14 fixes multiple vulnerabilities</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
	<name>openexr</name>
	<range><lt>3.4.14</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>Cary Phillips reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://github.com/AcademySoftwareFoundation/openexr/releases/tag/v3.4.14">
	  <p>[The OpenEXR 3.4.14] release addresses the following security vulnerabilities:</p>
	  <ul>
	    <li>CVE-2026-68514: PyOpenEXR deep prefixed literal RGB key collision heap buffer overflow</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-68513: PyOpenEXR prefixed literal RGB key collision heap buffer overflow</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-62986: PyOpenEXR deep prefixed RGB stale lane disclosure</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-61703: PyOpenEXR deep mixed RGB heap buffer overflow</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-61555: empty multiView viewFromChannelName file crash</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-59985: ILP32 OpenEXRCore RLE decode heap OOB read DoS</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-59984: ILP32 B44 InputFile decode scratch buffer overflow</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-59983: ILP32 DeepTiledInputFile sample count table decode OOB read</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-59982: ILP32 DWAA InputFile packed AC buffer overflow</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-59981: OpenEXRUtil SampleCountChannel row nonzero dataWindow heap OOB read</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-59189: OpenEXRUtil DeepImageChannel row nonzero dataWindow heap OOB read</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-59187: OpenEXR exrmetrics deep pixelmode heap buffer overflow</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-59186: OpenEXR ILP32 TiledRgbaInputFile large tile Array2D heap OOB write</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-59184: OpenEXRUtil FlatImageChannel row nonzero dataWindow heap OOB write</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-59183: Signed Integer Overflow Leading to Out-of-Bounds Memory Access in Deep Tile Decoding</li>
	  </ul>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-68514</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-68513</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-62986</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-61703</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-61555</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-59985</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-59984</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-59983</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-59982</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-59981</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-59189</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-59187</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-59186</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-59184</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-59183</cvename>
      <url>https://github.com/AcademySoftwareFoundation/openexr/releases/tag/v3.4.14</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-08-07</discovery>
      <entry>2026-08-14</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="2c73b6d5-971c-11f1-bdc8-2cf05da270f3">
    <topic>Gitlab -- vulnerabilities</topic>
    <affects>
<package>
	<name>gitlab-ce</name>
	<name>gitlab-ee</name>
	<range><ge>19.2.0</ge><lt>19.2.2</lt></range>
	<range><ge>19.1.0</ge><lt>19.1.4</lt></range>
	<range><ge>12.0.0</ge><lt>19.0.6</lt></range>
</package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>Gitlab reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://docs.gitlab.com/releases/patches/patch-release-gitlab-19-2-2-released/?nav=19.2.2">
	  <p>Cross-site Scripting issue in Analytics Dashboards table field configuration impacts GitLab CE/EE</p>
	  <p>Cross-site Scripting issue in Analytics Dashboards pagination controls impacts GitLab CE/EE GitLab</p>
	  <p>Improper Authorization issue in CI/CD pipeline API impacts GitLab CE/EE</p>
	  <p>Authorization Bypass issue in Duo Workflow Service impacts GitLab EE</p>
	  <p>Cross-site Scripting issue in CI manual job confirmation modal impacts GitLab CE/E</p>
	  <p>Missing Authorization issue in ProjectsController impacts GitLab EE</p>
	  <p>Denial of Service issue in GraphQL API JSON parser impacts GitLab CE/EE</p>
	  <p>Missing Authorization issue in merge requests API impacts GitLab EE</p>
	  <p>Missing Authorization issue in external status check API impacts GitLab EE</p>
	  <p>Incorrect Authorization issue in npm dist-tags endpoint impacts GitLab CE/EE</p>
	  <p>Missing Authorization issue in GitLab Duo settings page impacts GitLab EE</p>
	  <p>Incorrect Authorization issue in AI Tool Rules GraphQL resolver impacts GitLab EE</p>
	  <p>Incorrect Privilege Assignment issue in custom roles impacts GitLab EE</p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-15217</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-15216</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-15423</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-19228</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-16627</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-16494</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-7427</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-6821</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-4879</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-8667</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-18244</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-18433</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2025-9486</cvename>
      <url>https://docs.gitlab.com/releases/patches/patch-release-gitlab-19-2-2-released/?nav=19.2.2</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-08-12</discovery>
      <entry>2026-08-13</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="a4e5cc5f-d4bc-4f67-ad8e-0f6a9e37064f">
    <topic>chromium -- security fixes</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
       <name>chromium</name>
       <range><lt>151.0.7922.137</lt></range>
      </package>
      <package>
       <name>ungoogled-chromium</name>
       <range><lt>151.0.7922.137</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
       <p>Chrome Releases reports:</p>
       <blockquote cite="https://chromereleases.googleblog.com/2026/08/stable-channel-update-for-desktop_01815628406.html">
	 <p>This update includes 5 security fixes:</p>
	 <ul>
	    <li>[535000102] High CVE-2026-19556: Use after free in V8.</li>
	    <li>[534867485] High CVE-2026-19557: Use after free in TabStrip.</li>
	    <li>[536676756] High CVE-2026-19558: Use after free in Extensions.</li>
	    <li>[540100588] High CVE-2026-19559: Use after free in HTML.</li>
	    <li>[540482895] High CVE-2026-19560: Use after free in Blink.</li>
	 </ul>
       </blockquote>
      </body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-19556</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-19557</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-19558</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-19559</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-19560</cvename>
      <url>https://chromereleases.googleblog.com/2026/08/stable-channel-update-for-desktop_01815628406.html</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-08-11</discovery>
      <entry>2026-08-13</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="8acd79a5-35ee-4076-b107-3550bbd7d118">
    <topic>chromium -- security fixes</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
       <name>chromium</name>
       <range><lt>151.0.7922.108</lt></range>
      </package>
      <package>
       <name>ungoogled-chromium</name>
       <range><lt>151.0.7922.108</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
       <p>Chrome Releases reports:</p>
       <blockquote cite="https://chromereleases.googleblog.com/2026/08/stable-channel-update-for-desktop_01193673229.html">
	 <p>This update includes 41 security fixes:</p>
	 <ul>
	    <li>[499602793] Critical CVE-2026-19137: Use after free in WebGL.</li>
	    <li>[524824288] Critical CVE-2026-19149: Use after free in ura.</li>
	    <li>[532941869] Critical CVE-2026-19154: Use after free in Skia.</li>
	    <li>[534903095] Critical CVE-2026-19157: Out of bounds write in GLE.</li>
	    <li>[537729021] Critical CVE-2026-19170: Use after free in WebGL.</li>
	    <li>[537838324] Critical CVE-2026-19172: Use after free in Views.</li>
	    <li>[537390933] High CVE-2026-19169: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Contextual Tasks.</li>
	    <li>[536945254] High CVE-2026-19168: Inappropriate implementation in V8.</li>
	    <li>[500097298] High CVE-2026-19138: Heap buffer overflow in CrashReporting.</li>
	    <li>[511731805] High CVE-2026-19139: Race in CredentialProvider.</li>
	    <li>[513044017] High CVE-2026-19140: Use after free in GPU.</li>
	    <li>[513602949] High CVE-2026-19141: Use after free in Resources.</li>
	    <li>[515428251] High CVE-2026-19142: Use after free in Views.</li>
	    <li>[517772612] High CVE-2026-19143: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in WebPKs.</li>
	    <li>[520167277] High CVE-2026-19144: Use after free in HTML.</li>
	    <li>[521878431] High CVE-2026-19145: Use after free in Translate.</li>
	    <li>[523713150] High CVE-2026-19146: Uninitialized Use in GPU.</li>
	    <li>[524439798] High CVE-2026-19147: Use after free in ura.</li>
	    <li>[524460000] High CVE-2026-19148: Out of bounds write in GPU.</li>
	    <li>[526380803] High CVE-2026-19150: Inappropriate implementation in V8.</li>
	    <li>[530663440] High CVE-2026-19151: Use after free in V8.</li>
	    <li>[531165110] High CVE-2026-19152: Inappropriate implementation in avigation.</li>
	    <li>[532939327] High CVE-2026-19153: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Workers.</li>
	    <li>[533053621] High CVE-2026-19155: Use after free in Payments.</li>
	    <li>[533331920] High CVE-2026-19156: Heap buffer overflow in Base.</li>
	    <li>[535749174] High CVE-2026-19158: Use after free in Views.</li>
	    <li>[536067175] High CVE-2026-19159: Use after free in Views.</li>
	    <li>[536068737] High CVE-2026-19160: Uninitialized Use in Skia.</li>
	    <li>[536165038] High CVE-2026-19161: Uninitialized Use in Skia.</li>
	    <li>[536271629] High CVE-2026-19162: Out of bounds write in V8.</li>
	    <li>[536449742] High CVE-2026-19163: Use after free in Media.</li>
	    <li>[536470854] High CVE-2026-19164: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Codecs.</li>
	    <li>[536512612] High CVE-2026-19165: Use after free in Extensions.</li>
	    <li>[536584251] High CVE-2026-19166: Use after free in Web uthentication.</li>
	    <li>[536666274] High CVE-2026-19167: Integer overflow in GPU.</li>
	    <li>[537832446] High CVE-2026-19171: Use after free in Media.</li>
	    <li>[538332338] High CVE-2026-19173: Out of bounds write in Skia.</li>
	    <li>[538378084] High CVE-2026-19174: Integer overflow in V8.</li>
	    <li>[540138836] High CVE-2026-19175: Use after free in Payments.</li>
	    <li>[540157141] High CVE-2026-19176: Use after free in Skia.</li>
	    <li>[540289900] High CVE-2026-19177: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in UI.</li>
	 </ul>
       </blockquote>
      </body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-19137</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-19149</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-19154</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-19157</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-19170</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-19172</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-19169</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-19168</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-19138</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-19139</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-19140</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-19141</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-19142</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-19143</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-19144</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-19145</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-19146</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-19147</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-19148</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-19150</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-19151</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-19152</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-19153</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-19155</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-19156</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-19158</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-19159</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-19160</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-19161</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-19162</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-19163</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-19164</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-19165</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-19166</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-19167</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-19171</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-19173</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-19174</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-19175</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-19176</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-19177</cvename>
      <url>https://chromereleases.googleblog.com/2026/08/stable-channel-update-for-desktop_01193673229.html</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-08-06</discovery>
      <entry>2026-08-13</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="7a691536-968b-11f1-9863-50ebf6bdf8e9">
    <topic>phpmyfaq -- multiple vulnerabilities</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
	<name>phpmyfaq-php83</name>
	<name>phpmyfaq-php84</name>
	<name>phpmyfaq-php85</name>
	<range><lt>4.1.7</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>phpMyFAQ team reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://www.phpmyfaq.de/security/advisory-2026-08-04/">
	  <p>The WebAuthn login flow never persists the challenge it issues, so
	    the replay guard never runs. An attacker who captures a valid
	    assertion can replay it to authenticate as the victim.</p>
	  <p>The brute-force throttle protecting the administration two-factor
	    prompt is scoped to the session. An attacker who starts with a fresh
	    cookie jar resets the counter and can guess TOTP codes without any
	    effective rate limit.</p>
	  <p>An LDAP login silently reactivates a local account that an
	    administrator has blocked, and the state change is not written to the
	    audit log, so a revoked user regains access unnoticed.</p>
	  <p>The remember-me cookie is issued before the second factor has been
	    verified. An attacker who knows only the password can keep the cookie
	    from the incomplete login and use it to return as the fully
	    authenticated user, bypassing two-factor authentication.</p>
	  <p>Glossary input is escaped before it is truncated. Truncation can cut
	    an escape sequence in half, which allows an authenticated user to
	    inject SQL into the resulting query.</p>
	  <p>A tracking file below the document root is served without
	    authentication and contains password reset tokens, allowing an
	    unauthenticated visitor to take over the accounts those tokens belong
	    to.</p>
	  <p>The public PDF export does not check whether a FAQ record is active,
	    so an unauthenticated visitor can retrieve the title and solution of
	    drafts and unpublished entries.</p>
	  <p>Comment endpoints do not verify authorization for the parent FAQ
	    record, exposing the comments, the personal data of the commenters,
	    and attachment metadata of restricted records.</p>
	  <p>The PostgreSQL search backend declares the wrong LIKE ESCAPE
	    character, which makes the wildcard-escaping fix ineffective on that
	    backend.</p>
	  <p>The administration API endpoints that read the LDAP, Elasticsearch,
	    OpenSearcr, and dashboard configuration only require a login instead
	    of the CONFIGURATION_EDIT permission, so any authenticated user can
	    read these settings.</p>
	  <p>An authenticated FAQ editor can reference a local file as an image in
	    a FAQ entry and have the PDF export embed and disclose its contents.</p>
	  <p>The registration endpoints remain reachable even when
	    security.enableRegistration is turned off, so visitors can still create
	     accounts on an installation that is meant to be closed.</p>
	  <p>The content backup is written as a ZIP archive into the web-accessible
	    document root, where anyone who guesses or learns its name can download
	    the full contents of the installation.</p>
	  <p>The backup, database migration, and maintenance mode endpoints can be
	    reached without authentication, allowing an unauthenticated attacker
	    to export data or put the installation into maintenance mode.</p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <url>https://www.phpmyfaq.de/security/advisory-2026-08-04/</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-08-04</discovery>
      <entry>2026-08-12</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="f4af92f7-95ae-11f1-a6f7-b42e991fc52e">
    <topic>gitea -- Multiple vulnerabilities</topic>
    <affects>
    <package>
    <name>gitea</name>
    <range><lt>1.27.1</lt></range>
    </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>Gitea reports</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://blog.gitea.com/release-of-1.27.1/">
	<p>This release addresses the following security
	vulnerabilities. Please upgrade as soon as possible.
	</p>
	<p>
	Unauthenticated arbitrary file read via the Org-mode
	#INCLUDE directive.
	</p>
	<p>
	Remote code execution via the diffpatch API through Git hook
	installation.
	</p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-59774</cvename>
      <url>https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/security/advisories/GHSA-6v53-hr58-556r</url>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-60004</cvename>
      <url>https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/security/advisories/GHSA-rcr6-4jqh-j84m</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-08-11</discovery>
      <entry>2026-08-11</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="ab10c9c9-95ac-11f1-a6f7-b42e991fc52e">
  <topic>chromium -- Multiple vulnerabilities</topic>
  <affects>
    <package>
      <name>chromium</name>
      <range><lt>151.0.7922.109</lt></range>
    </package>
  </affects>
  <description>
    <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
      <p>Google has released Chrome 151.0.7922.109 to address multiple critical vulnerabilities.</p>
	<p>
	CVE-2026-19172:
	  Use after free in Views in Google Chrome prior to
	  151.0.7922.109 allowed a remote attacker who had
	  compromised the renderer process to potentially perform a
	  sandbox escape via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security
	  severity: Critical)
	</p>
	<p>
	CVE-2026-19170:
	  Use after free in WebGL in Google Chrome on Android
	  prior to 151.0.7922.109 allowed a remote attacker to
	  potentially perform a sandbox escape via a crafted HTML
	  page. (Chromium security severity: Critical)
	</p>
	<p>
	CVE-2026-19157:
	  Out of bounds write in ANGLE in Google Chrome on Android
	  prior to 151.0.7922.109 allowed a remote attacker to
	  potentially perform a sandbox escape via a crafted HTML
	  page. (Chromium security severity: Critical)
	</p>
	<p>
	CVE-2026-19154:
	  Use after free in Skia in Google Chrome on Android prior
	  to 151.0.7922.109 allowed a remote attacker who had
	  compromised the renderer process to potentially perform a
	  sandbox escape via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security
	  severity: Critical)
	</p>
	<p>
	CVE-2026-19149:
	  Use after free in Aura in Google Chrome on Linux prior to
	  151.0.7922.109 allowed a remote attacker to potentially
	  perform a sandbox escape via a crafted HTML page.
	  (Chromium security severity: Critical)
	</p>
	<p>
	CVE-2026-19137:
	  Use after free in WebGL in Google Chrome on Android prior
	  to 151.0.7922.109 allowed a remote attacker who had
	  compromised the renderer process to potentially perform a
	  sandbox escape via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security
	  severity: Critical)
	</p>
    </body>
  </description>
  <references>
    <cvename>CVE-2026-19172</cvename>
    <cvename>CVE-2026-19170</cvename>
    <cvename>CVE-2026-19157</cvename>
    <cvename>CVE-2026-19154</cvename>
    <cvename>CVE-2026-19149</cvename>
    <cvename>CVE-2026-19137</cvename>
    <url>https://chromereleases.googleblog.com/2026/08/stable-channel-update-for-desktop_01193673229.html</url>
  </references>
  <dates>
    <discovery>2026-08-06</discovery>
    <entry>2026-08-11</entry>
  </dates>
</vuln>

  <vuln vid="20655058-9565-11f1-8144-8447094a420f">
    <topic>OpenSSH -- Multiple vulnerbilities</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
	<name>openssh-portable</name>
	<range><lt>10.5.p1,1</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>The OpenSSH project reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://www.openssh.org/txt/release-10.5">
	  <ul>
	    <li>ssh-agent(1): fix an interaction between agent locking and the
	      session-bind@openssh.com extension that is used to identify
	      forwarded agents.</li>
	    <li>ssh(1): avoid potential realloc use-after-free in the client if a
	      remote forwarding is added via the local session multiplexing
	      socket while a remote forwarding open request is pending with the
	      server.</li>
	    <li>sshd(8): make the authorized_keys "restrict" keyword apply
	      correctly to tunnel forwarding too (which is administratively
	      disabled by default).</li>
	  </ul>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <url>https://www.openssh.org/txt/release-10.5</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-08-11</discovery>
      <entry>2026-08-11</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="e87b74fa-940d-11f1-b046-3c7c3fba4204">
    <topic>Calibre Web -- two vulnerabilities</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
	<name>py310-calibreweb</name>
	<name>py311-calibreweb</name>
	<name>py312-calibreweb</name>
	<name>py313-calibreweb</name>
	<name>py313t-calibreweb</name>
	<name>py314-calibreweb</name>
	<name>py314t-calibreweb</name>
	<name>py315-calibreweb</name>
	<range><ge>0.6.24</ge><lt>0.6.27</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>The Calibre Web Team reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-2g7m-ph9x-7q7m">
	  <p>ReDoS in strip_whitespaces() function in cps/string_helper.py in Calibre Web and Autocaliweb allows unauthenticated remote attackers to cause denial of service via specially crafted username parameter that triggers catastrophic backtracking during login.<br/>This issue affects Calibre Web: 0.6.24 (Nicolette); Autocaliweb: from 0.7.0 before 0.7.1.</p>
	</blockquote>
	<blockquote cite="https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-qc4j-v7h6-xr5h">
	  <p>Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection') vulnerability in Calibre Web, Autocaliweb allows Blind OS Command Injection.<br/>This issue affects Calibre Web: 0.6.24 (Nicolette); Autocaliweb: from 0.7.0 before 0.7.1.</p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2025-6998</cvename>
      <url>https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-6998</url>
      <cvename>CVE-2025-7404</cvename>
      <url>https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-7404</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2025-07-24</discovery>
      <entry>2026-08-09</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="54d19b85-93d4-11f1-8144-8447094a420f">
    <topic>Roundcube -- Multiple vulnerabilities</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
	<name>roundcube-php82</name>
	<name>roundcube-php83</name>
	<name>roundcube-php84</name>
	<name>roundcube-php85</name>
	<name>roundcube-php85</name>
	<range><lt>1.7.3,1</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>The Roundcube project reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://roundcube.net/news/2026/08/09/security-updates-1.6.18-and-1.7.3">
	  <ul>
	    <li>>Missing basic validation for content proxied by the css proxy</li>
	    <li>SSRF bypass via specific local address URLs using 100.64.0.0/10 and fe80::/10 nets</li>
	    <li>SSRF filter bypass via various forms of nip.io/sslip.io hostnames evading is_local_url() check</li>
	    <li>remote content blocking bypass via unclosed url() in a FuncIRI attribute</li>
	    <li>LDAP filter injection via unescaped %u/%fu/%d substitution into the search_filter</li>
	    <li>arbitrary Sieve script injection via a filter rule name bypassing managesieve_disabled_actions</li>
	    <li>RCE via cmd_learn driver of markasjunk plugin</li>
	    <li>Fix IMAP command injection via mail search and LITERAL+ byte-count desynchronization</li>
	    <li>password’s modoboa driver leak of an authentication token to a user-controlled host</li>
	    <li>stored XSS in “Add to address book” action</li>
	    <li>HTML/CSS sanitization bypass via SVG animate by attribute</li>
	  </ul>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <url>https://roundcube.net/news/2026/08/09/security-updates-1.6.18-and-1.7.3</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-08-09</discovery>
      <entry>2026-08-09</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="dde0fb16-2731-4d3c-aabf-459357235745">
    <topic>gstreamer1 -- multiple vulnerabilities</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
	<name>gstreamer1-libav</name>
	<name>gstreamer1-plugins-bad</name>
	<name>gstreamer1-plugins-good</name>
	<name>gstreamer1-plugins-ugly</name>
	<range><lt>1.28.6</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>The GStreamer project reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://gstreamer.freedesktop.org/security/">
	  <p>Multiple security issues were identified and fixed in the GStreamer framework.</p>
	  <ul>
	    <li>GStreamer-SA-2026-0067: Heap buffer overflow and memory leak in JPEG 2000 decoder</li>
	    <li>GStreamer-SA-2026-0068: Heap buffer overflow in QCELP RTP depayloader</li>
	    <li>GStreamer-SA-2026-0069: Heap buffer overflow in FFmpeg demuxer wrapper</li>
	    <li>GStreamer-SA-2026-0070: Out-of bounds write in H.265/HEVC parser short-term RPS parsing</li>
	    <li>GStreamer-SA-2026-0071: Heap buffer overflow in DVD subpicture decoder</li>
	    <li>GStreamer-SA-2026-0072: Multiple out-of-bounds reads, out-of-bounds writes, and integer overflow vulnerabilities in the AVI demuxer</li>
	    <li>GStreamer-SA-2026-0073: Out-of-bounds read in Matroska demuxer FLAC header parser</li>
	    <li>GStreamer-SA-2026-0075: Integer overflow and underflow in ASF demuxer bounds checks</li>
	    <li>GStreamer-SA-2026-0076: Unbounded memory growth in H.264/H.265 RTP depayloaders during fragmented NAL unit reassembly</li>
	    <li>GStreamer-SA-2026-0077: Heap out-of-bounds write in IMA ADPCM audio decoder</li>
	  </ul>
	</blockquote>
      </body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-18649</cvename>
      <url>https://gstreamer.freedesktop.org/security/sa-2026-0067.html</url>
      <url>https://gstreamer.freedesktop.org/security/sa-2026-0068.html</url>
      <url>https://gstreamer.freedesktop.org/security/sa-2026-0069.html</url>
      <url>https://gstreamer.freedesktop.org/security/sa-2026-0070.html</url>
      <url>https://gstreamer.freedesktop.org/security/sa-2026-0071.html</url>
      <url>https://gstreamer.freedesktop.org/security/sa-2026-0072.html</url>
      <url>https://gstreamer.freedesktop.org/security/sa-2026-0073.html</url>
      <url>https://gstreamer.freedesktop.org/security/sa-2026-0075.html</url>
      <url>https://gstreamer.freedesktop.org/security/sa-2026-0076.html</url>
      <url>https://gstreamer.freedesktop.org/security/sa-2026-0077.html</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-08-05</discovery>
      <entry>2026-08-08</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="1fae5869-9275-11f1-83e9-901b0e13f1a0">
    <topic>libXfont2 -- multiple vulnerabilities</topic>
    <affects>
<package>
<name>libXfont2</name>
<range><lt>2.0.9</lt></range>
</package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>Zhixi "Jace" Sun, independent security researcher reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-announce/2026-August/003734.html">
	  <ul>
	    <li>CVE-2026-44950: Font Server Client Cumulative Glyph Data Heap Buffer Overflow</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-59679: Font Server Client encoding Out-Of-Bounds Read/Write</li>
	  </ul>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-44950</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-59679</cvename>
      <url>https://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-announce/2026-August/003734.html</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-08-05</discovery>
      <entry>2026-08-07</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="7e45952f-9268-11f1-ab2f-3c7c3fba4204">
    <topic>DNSDist, PowerDNS, PowerDNS Recursor -- vulnerability</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
	<name>dnsdist</name>
	<range><lt>2.1.1</lt></range>
      </package>
      <package>
	<name>powerdns</name>
	<range><lt>5.1.4</lt></range>
      </package>
      <package>
	<name>powerdns-recursor</name>
	<range><lt>5.4.5</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<blockquote cite="https://blog.powerdns.com/2026/08/06/powerdns-security-advisory-2026-11-for-powerdns-authoritative-server-recursor-and-dnsdist">
	<p>CVE-2026-52682: A crafted DNS packet can cause increased memory and CPU consumption.</p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-52682</cvename>
      <url>https://blog.powerdns.com/2026/08/06/powerdns-security-advisory-2026-11-for-powerdns-authoritative-server-recursor-and-dnsdist</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-07-28</discovery>
      <entry>2026-08-07</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="5ce58e67-919a-11f1-b333-901b0edee044">
    <topic>py-djangorestframework -- two vulnerabilities</topic>
    <affects>
    <package>
       <name>py310-djangorestframework</name>
       <name>py311-djangorestframework</name>
       <name>py312-djangorestframework</name>
       <name>py313-djangorestframework</name>
       <name>py313t-djangorestframework</name>
       <name>py314-djangorestframework</name>
       <name>py314t-djangorestframework</name>
       <name>py315-djangorestframework</name>
       <range><lt>3.17.2,1</lt></range>
    </package>
    <package>
       <name>py312-dj60-djangorestframework</name>
       <name>py313-dj60-djangorestframework</name>
       <name>py313t-dj60-djangorestframework</name>
       <name>py314-dj60-djangorestframework</name>
       <name>py314t-dj60-djangorestframework</name>
       <name>py315-dj60-djangorestframework</name>
       <range><lt>3.17.2</lt></range>
    </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>Bruno Alla reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://github.com/encode/django-rest-framework/releases/tag/3.17.2">
	<ul>
	  <li>Potential bypass of Django `DATA_UPLOAD_MAX_MEMORY_SIZE` when parsing oversized JSON and urlencoded request bodies via DRF `request.data`</li>
	  <li>AdminRenderer may disclose GET-protected data when rendering invalid write requests</li>
	</ul>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <url>https://github.com/encode/django-rest-framework/security/advisories/GHSA-2m8g-3cmr-wg3w</url>
      <url>https://github.com/encode/django-rest-framework/security/advisories/GHSA-g47c-3xmw-q6m2</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-08-05</discovery>
      <entry>2026-08-07</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="e1208b90-91c3-11f1-a0bc-3c7c3fba4204">
    <topic>Keycloak -- multiple vulnerabilities</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
	<name>keycloak</name>
	<range><lt>26.7.1</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>The Keycloak Team reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://www.keycloak.org/2026/08/keycloak-2671-released">
	  <ul>
	    <li>CVE-2026-9793: JWE request object bypasses requestObjectSignatureAlg enforcement</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-4629: Privilege escalation via hardcoded role mapper injection in manage-clients</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-14209: Keycloak Admin UI Extension `brute-force-user` User Disclosure via `search=id:` under FGAP v2</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-14614: Keycloak 26.6.3 Fine-Grained Admin Permissions Bypass in Client Scope Assignment</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-14615: FGAP v2 parent group children endpoint bypasses per-child view permission filter</li>
	  </ul>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-9793</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-4629</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-14209</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-14614</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-14615</cvename>
      <url>https://www.keycloak.org/2026/08/keycloak-2671-released</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-08-05</discovery>
      <entry>2026-08-06</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="0b58454e-8ff3-11f1-b35c-4c526214c986">
    <topic>erlang -- SSH plaintext recovery attack against CBC ciphers</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
	<name>erlang</name>
	<range><lt>28.5.0.5,4</lt></range>
      </package>
      <package>
	<name>erlang-runtime27</name>
	<range><lt>27.3.4.16</lt></range>
      </package>
      <package>
	<name>erlang-runtime28</name>
	<range><lt>28.5.0.5</lt></range>
      </package>
      <package>
	<name>erlang-runtime29</name>
	<range><lt>29.0.5</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>The Erlang/OTP team reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://github.com/erlang/otp/releases/tag/OTP-28.5.0.5">
	  <p>The SSH client and server now reject incoming packets not
	  aligned to the cipher block size as required by RFC 4253
	  section 6. For CBC ciphers, a timing-safe "packet discard"
	  mechanism (CVE-2008-5161 mitigation) ensures structural errors
	  are indistinguishable from MAC failures before disconnecting.
	  AEAD and encrypt-then-MAC modes disconnect immediately.</p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2008-5161</cvename>
      <url>https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2008-5161</url>
      <url>https://github.com/erlang/otp/pull/11110</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-07-30</discovery>
      <entry>2026-08-04</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="9096f6e4-3a2f-4d16-89fb-f909aa0a7760">
    <topic>jenkins -- multiple vulnerabilities</topic>
    <affects>
    <package>
	<name>jenkins</name>
	<range><lt>2.576</lt></range>
    </package>
    <package>
	<name>jenkins-lts</name>
	<range><lt>2.568.2</lt></range>
    </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>Jenkins Security Advisory 2026-08-05:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://www.jenkins.io/security/advisory/2026-08-05/">
	  <ul>
	    <li>SECURITY-3911 / CVE-2026-70426: Agent-to-controller
	    deserialization filter bypass (Critical)</li>
	    <li>SECURITY-3930 / CVE-2026-70427: Link following vulnerability
	    allows arbitrary file creation (High)</li>
	    <li>SECURITY-3927 / CVE-2026-70428: Path traversal vulnerability in
	    file parameters (High)</li>
	    <li>SECURITY-3924 / CVE-2026-70429: Improper handling of case
	    sensitivity allows privilege escalation (High)</li>
	    <li>SECURITY-3916 / CVE-2026-70430: Users with Overall/Manage
	    permission can instantiate any types related to configuration
	    (Low)</li>
	  </ul>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-70426</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-70427</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-70428</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-70429</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-70430</cvename>
      <url>https://www.jenkins.io/security/advisory/2026-08-05/</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-08-05</discovery>
      <entry>2026-08-06</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="10f5d195-90a5-11f1-bc30-3497f65b111b">
    <topic>MySQL 8.4 -- Multiple vulnerabilities</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
	<name>mysql84-client</name>
	<range><lt>8.4.11</lt></range>
      </package>
      <package>
	<name>mysql84-server</name>
	<range><lt>8.4.11</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>The Oracle Critical Patch Update of July 2026 addresses 54 issues
	  in Oracle MySQL, 31 of which apply to the MySQL 8.4 series and to
	  the MySQL Router shipped with these ports.</p>
	<p>The affected server components are Optimizer, Replication,
	  Group Replication (plugin and GCS), X Plugin, Clone Plugin,
	  InnoDB, JSON, DDL, Performance Schema and Pluggable
	  Authentication.</p>
	<p>Most of the issues require an authenticated account, in many
	  cases one with high privileges, and let an attacker hang or
	  repeatedly crash the server, resulting in a denial of service.
	  Three issues need no credentials at all: CVE-2026-60315 (CVSS
	  8.2) is reachable over the X protocol and affects availability,
	  while CVE-2026-60314 and CVE-2026-60725 affect MySQL Router over
	  HTTP, the latter allowing unauthorized read and write access.
	  The highest rated issue for this branch is CVE-2026-60163 (CVSS
	  8.4) in the Group Replication plugin, exploitable locally with
	  full impact on confidentiality, integrity and availability.</p>
	<p>Please refer to the referenced CVE entries for the details of
	  each individual issue.</p>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-46936</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-47012</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-47023</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-47052</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-47064</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-60145</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-60163</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-60177</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-60178</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-60182</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-60183</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-60184</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-60185</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-60186</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-60187</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-60188</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-60189</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-60190</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-60191</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-60314</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-60315</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-60316</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-60331</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-60332</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-60585</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-60725</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-60747</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-61081</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-61094</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-61096</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-61109</cvename>
      <url>https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpujul2026.html</url>
      <url>https://dev.mysql.com/community/security/advisories/2026-07-21/</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-07-21</discovery>
      <entry>2026-08-05</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="10f5f76e-90a5-11f1-bc30-3497f65b111b">
    <topic>MySQL 9.7 -- Multiple vulnerabilities</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
	<name>mysql97-client</name>
	<range><lt>9.7.2</lt></range>
      </package>
      <package>
	<name>mysql97-server</name>
	<range><lt>9.7.2</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>The Oracle Critical Patch Update of July 2026 addresses 54 issues
	  in Oracle MySQL, 43 of which apply to the MySQL 9.7 series and to
	  the MySQL Router shipped with these ports. The 9.7 branch is
	  affected by every server issue of the 8.4 branch plus twelve
	  additional ones in code paths that only exist in 9.x.</p>
	<p>The affected server components are Optimizer, Replication,
	  Group Replication (plugin and GCS), X Plugin, Clone Plugin,
	  InnoDB, JSON, JSON Duality, GIS, DDL, Configurator, Performance
	  Schema and Pluggable Authentication.</p>
	<p>Most of the issues require an authenticated account, in many
	  cases one with high privileges, and let an attacker hang or
	  repeatedly crash the server, resulting in a denial of service.
	  Three issues need no credentials at all: CVE-2026-60315 (CVSS
	  8.2) is reachable over the X protocol and affects availability,
	  while CVE-2026-60314 and CVE-2026-60725 affect MySQL Router over
	  HTTP, the latter allowing unauthorized read and write access.
	  The highest rated issue for this branch is CVE-2026-60163 (CVSS
	  8.4) in the Group Replication plugin, exploitable locally with
	  full impact on confidentiality, integrity and availability.
	  CVE-2026-60181 in the Configurator component requires user
	  interaction and is specific to the 9.7 branch.</p>
	<p>Please refer to the referenced CVE entries for the details of
	  each individual issue.</p>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-46936</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-47008</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-47012</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-47023</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-47052</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-47064</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-60145</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-60163</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-60174</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-60177</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-60178</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-60181</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-60182</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-60183</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-60184</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-60185</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-60186</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-60187</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-60188</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-60189</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-60190</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-60191</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-60194</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-60195</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-60311</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-60314</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-60315</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-60316</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-60324</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-60331</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-60332</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-60585</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-60718</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-60725</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-60747</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-61081</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-61093</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-61094</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-61096</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-61108</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-61109</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-61128</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-61144</cvename>
      <url>https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpujul2026.html</url>
      <url>https://dev.mysql.com/community/security/advisories/2026-07-21/</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-07-21</discovery>
      <entry>2026-08-05</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="575ddefc-9085-11f1-b295-98b78501ef2a">
    <topic>PowerDNS Recursor -- multiple vulnerabilities</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
	<name>powerdns-recursor</name>
	<range><lt>5.4.4</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>PowerDNS Team reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://doc.powerdns.com/recursor/security-advisories/powerdns-advisory-2026-10.html">
	  <ul>
	    <li>CVE-2026-52688: RRSIGs with too few labels can lead to bypass of DNSSEC wildcard validation</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-52686: Wildcard CNAME proof validation bypass¶</li>
	  </ul>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-52868</cvename>
      <url>https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-52688</url>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-52686</cvename>
      <url>https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-52686</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-07-22</discovery>
      <entry>2026-08-05</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="347fe124-8f53-11f1-9f4f-3c7c3fba4204">
    <topic>Angie -- multiple vulnerabilities</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
       <name>angie</name>
       <range><lt>1.12.1</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>The Angie Software Team reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://en.angie.software/angie/docs/oss_changes/#angie-1-12-1">
	  <p>When evaluating a string expression in which unnamed capture variables ($1, $2, etc.) preceded a map directive variable whose value is determined by a regular expression, or when using a non-cacheable (volatile) map directive variable whose key contained a capture variable also used in the value of the same directive, worker process memory corruption or a worker process crash could occur (CVE-2026-42533); the fix was ported from nginx 1.31.3.</p>
	  <p>When using the slice directive or background cache update, if unnamed capture variables ($1, $2, etc.) were used together with a non-cacheable (volatile) map directive variable with a regular expression, the value of an unnamed capture variable could contain arbitrary bytes from worker process memory, or a worker process crash could occur (CVE-2026-60005); the fix was ported from nginx 1.31.3.</p>
	  <p>When using the SSI module with unbuffered proxying, worker process memory corruption or a worker process crash could occur (CVE-2026-56434); the fix was ported from nginx 1.31.3.</p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-42533</cvename>
      <url>https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-42533</url>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-60005</cvename>
      <url>https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-60005</url>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-56434</cvename>
      <url>https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-56434</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-07-17</discovery>
      <entry>2026-08-03</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="12d42997-8e54-11f1-8144-8447094a420f">
    <topic>Weechat -- Multiple vulnerabilities</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
	<name>weechat</name>
	<range><lt>4.10.0</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>The Weechat project reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://github.com/weechat/weechat/releases/tag/v4.10.0">
	  <ul>
	    <li>core: fix buffer overflow in display of time in chat area with a custom time format</li>
	    <li>core: fix integer overflow in size calculation when evaluating "${hide:...}" and "${base_encode:...}"</li>
	    <li>core: fix possible buffer overflow in command /color alias</li>
	    <li>core: fix possible buffer overflow in list of commands displayed by /help</li>
	    <li>irc: fix heap use-after-free when a batched message causes a disconnection from the server (GHSA-rfmh-3r7f-jpx5)</li>
	    <li>irc: fix stack buffer overflow when splitting a JOIN message with a large list of channels and keys (GHSA-q2xg-9ggx-77mr)</li>
	    <li>irc: limit size of data received from the server to prevent memory exhaustion</li>
	    <li>irc: fix out-of-bounds read on incoming DCC command with a quoted filename ending the message</li>
	    <li>logger: fix path traversal in log file name when a buffer local variable contains the char used internally to protect directory separators</li>
	    <li>relay: fix use-after-free and double free on remote buffer (GHSA-hx59-4hq9-6vmw)</li>
	    <li>relay: fix authentication bypass with the "plain" password hash algorithm (GHSA-68ff-gq39-pqjm)</li>
	    <li>relay: limit size of decompressed websocket frame with permessage-deflate to prevent memory exhaustion (GHSA-v2v4-45wm-5cr3, CVE-2026-53524)</li>
	    <li>relay: limit size of received websocket frame and HTTP body to prevent memory exhaustion</li>
	    <li>relay: limit size of partial message received while reading an HTTP request to prevent memory exhaustion</li>
	    <li>relay: fix timing attack on password authentication (GHSA-vhv8-g2r9-cwcc, CVE-2026-53525)</li>
	    <li>relay: fix out-of-bounds read in dump of data</li>
	    <li>relay/api: fix memory leak in resources "handshake", "input" and "completion" (GHSA-wmpc-m6g9-fwj8)</li>
	    <li>relay: fix read of uncompressed websocket frame</li>
	    <li>api, relay: fix timing attack on TOTP validation (GHSA-vhv8-g2r9-cwcc, CVE-2026-53525)</li>
	    <li>xfer: replace directory separator in remote nick by underscore in download filename to prevent writing the file outside the download directory</li>
	    <li>xfer: fix out-of-bounds read when receiving empty line in DCC chat</li>
	    <li>xfer: fix out-of-bounds write in xfer file transfer resume</li>
	  </ul>
	</blockquote>
      </body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-53524</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-53525</cvename>
      <url>https://github.com/weechat/weechat/releases/tag/v4.10.0</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-08-02</discovery>
      <entry>2026-08-02</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="ca42379d-8d45-11f1-a129-901b0e9408dc">
    <topic>ejabberd -- Multiple security vulnerabilities</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
	<name>ejabberd</name>
	<range><lt>26.07</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>ejabberd team reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://www.process-one.net/blog/ejabberd-26-07/#security">
	  <ul>
	    <li>It's possible to craft PLAIN auth request and
	    authenticate as one user, but then open session for
	    different one.</li>
	    <li>mod_caps persistent cache can be poisoned by using
	    legacy version requests.This cache was only used to
	    determine list of nodes that should trigger notifications
	    in PubSub presence-based delivery.</li>
	    <li>SQL injection in mod_pubsub handling of paging
	    requests.</li>
	    <li>Possible atom exhaustion that can be triggered by
	    issuing REST requests to mod_http_api.</li>
	    <li>It was possible to make ejabberd send redirect
	    response for OAuth requests to unvetted url. This required
	    enabling ejabberd to act as OAuth provider (by adding
	    request handler for ejabberd_oauth in http listener). As
	    part of this fix we changed oauth_client_id_check default
	    value to db.</li>
	    <li>using ejabberd as OAuth provider will be only allowed
	    by clients</li>
	    <li>that were previously registered with
	    oauth_add_client_password or oauth_add_client_implicit
	    commands.</li>
	    <li>Tokens generated by mod_bosh, captcha, mod_auth_fast,
	    mod_http_upload and mod_invites used not cryptographically
	    strong random number generators.</li>
	    <li>Files server by mod_http_upload didn't have XSS
	    prevention headers.</li>
	    <li>Issues in authentication of SIP requests.</li>
	    <li>Request to web_admin were lacking CSRF
	    protection.</li>
	    <li>It was possible to skip captcha verification in
	    mod_register_web.</li>
	    <li>mod_conversejs allowed putting unescaped value from
	    url in page content.</li>
	  </ul>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <url>https://www.process-one.net/blog/ejabberd-26-07/#security</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-07-30</discovery>
      <entry>2026-08-01</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="1976b049-8ccc-11f1-b333-901b0edee044">
    <topic>py-mkdocs-material -- DOM XSS vulnerability</topic>
    <affects>
<package>
    <name>py310-mkdocs-material</name>
    <name>py311-mkdocs-material</name>
    <name>py312-mkdocs-material</name>
    <name>py313-mkdocs-material</name>
    <name>py313t-mkdocs-material</name>
    <name>py314-mkdocs-material</name>
    <name>py314t-mkdocs-material</name>
    <name>py315-mkdocs-material</name>
<range><lt>9.7.7</lt></range>
</package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>Martin Donath reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://github.com/squidfunk/mkdocs-material/security/advisories/GHSA-xvg9-69gf-fjrf">
	  <p>Material for MkDocs 7.2.0 through 9.7.6 contains a DOM-based cross-site scripting vulnerability in the optional search.suggest feature. A crafted q URL parameter could execute JavaScript in the documentation site's origin after user interaction.</p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <url>https://github.com/squidfunk/mkdocs-material/security/advisories/GHSA-xvg9-69gf-fjrf</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-07-17</discovery>
      <entry>2026-07-31</entry>
      <modified>2026-08-07</modified>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="0d5b4884-8c2b-11f1-8144-8447094a420f">
    <topic>Weechat -- Multiple vulnerabilities</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
	<name>weechat</name>
	<range><lt>4.9.5</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>The Weechat project reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://weechat.org/doc/weechat/security/">
	  <p>Use-after-free and double free when a remote relay sends an event with an array as body.</p>
	  <p>Use-after-free in the irc plugin when a batched message disconnects the server.</p>
	  <p>Stack buffer overflow when building a JOIN command with channel keys.</p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <url>https://weechat.org/doc/weechat/security/</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-07-26</discovery>
      <entry>2026-07-30</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="ef71114e-8c1c-11f1-a221-3c7c3fba4204">
    <topic>NetBird -- Local Privilege Escalation via Unauthenticated IPC Socket</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
       <name>netbird</name>
       <range><gt>0.5.0</gt><lt>0.76.0</lt></range>
    </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>The NetBird Team reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://github.com/netbirdio/netbird/security/advisories/GHSA-qcpp-8vwj-hhwr">
	  <p>The NetBird client daemon exposes its gRPC control interface to any local process with no authentication, in all versions from 0.5.0 (March 2022) to 0.75.1. On Linux, macOS and FreeBSD the interface is a Unix domain socket (/var/run/netbird.sock) with world-readable/writable permissions (0666). On Windows it is a loopback TCP listener (127.0.0.1:41731), where the transport carries no caller identity at all. Any unprivileged local user can connect and invoke all daemon RPCs without credentials.</p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <url>https://github.com/netbirdio/netbird/security/advisories/GHSA-qcpp-8vwj-hhwr</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-07-29</discovery>
      <entry>2026-07-30</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="20683bca-e344-4348-a033-db862123615d">
    <topic>chromium -- security fixes</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
       <name>chromium</name>
       <range><lt>151.0.7922.71</lt></range>
      </package>
      <package>
       <name>ungoogled-chromium</name>
       <range><lt>151.0.7922.71</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
       <p>Chrome Releases reports:</p>
       <blockquote cite="https://chromereleases.googleblog.com/2026/07/stable-channel-update-for-desktop_0887107924.html">
	 <p>This update includes 370 security fixes:</p>
	 <ul>
	    <li>[514442821] Critical CVE-2026-17650: Use after free in Compositing.</li>
	    <li>[517307966] Critical CVE-2026-17651: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Dawn.</li>
	    <li>[519262990] Critical CVE-2026-17652: Use after free in Views.</li>
	    <li>[520514458] Critical CVE-2026-17653: Use after free in Skia.</li>
	    <li>[522314940] Critical CVE-2026-17654: Race in Updater.</li>
	    <li>[522556145] Critical CVE-2026-17655: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in ANGLE.</li>
	    <li>[523725277] Critical CVE-2026-17656: Use after free in Ozone.</li>
	    <li>[502293787] High CVE-2026-17657: Use after free in Navigation.</li>
	    <li>[523030583] High CVE-2026-17658: Use after free in V8.</li>
	    <li>[495463654] High CVE-2026-17659: Inappropriate implementation in SiteIsolation.</li>
	    <li>[497428001] High CVE-2026-17660: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Network.</li>
	    <li>[497451790] High CVE-2026-17661: Use after free in Loader.</li>
	    <li>[497491557] High CVE-2026-17662: Insufficient policy enforcement in Prefetch.</li>
	    <li>[500225310] High CVE-2026-17663: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in GPU.</li>
	    <li>[500554346] High CVE-2026-17664: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Loader.</li>
	    <li>[511277457] High CVE-2026-17665: Use after free in V8.</li>
	    <li>[511761758] High CVE-2026-17666: Cryptographic Flaw in Enterprise.</li>
	    <li>[513043537] High CVE-2026-17667: Uninitialized Use in ANGLE.</li>
	    <li>[513134019] High CVE-2026-17668: Uninitialized Use in ANGLE.</li>
	    <li>[513142464] High CVE-2026-17669: Inappropriate implementation in Chrome for iOS.</li>
	    <li>[513228974] High CVE-2026-17670: Use after free in Views.</li>
	    <li>[513257423] High CVE-2026-17671: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in ANGLE.</li>
	    <li>[513375270] High CVE-2026-17672: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Chromecast.</li>
	    <li>[513735177] High CVE-2026-17673: Integer overflow in QUIC.</li>
	    <li>[513791232] High CVE-2026-17674: Inappropriate implementation in HTML.</li>
	    <li>[513920258] High CVE-2026-17675: Out of bounds write in ANGLE.</li>
	    <li>[513920298] High CVE-2026-17676: Inappropriate implementation in ANGLE.</li>
	    <li>[513921488] High CVE-2026-17677: Inappropriate implementation in ANGLE.</li>
	    <li>[515452019] High CVE-2026-17678: Out of bounds read in ANGLE.</li>
	    <li>[516430649] High CVE-2026-17679: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Print Preview.</li>
	    <li>[516486611] High CVE-2026-17680: Heap buffer overflow in Color.</li>
	    <li>[516813184] High CVE-2026-17681: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Web Authentication.</li>
	    <li>[516837126] High CVE-2026-17682: Integer overflow in ANGLE.</li>
	    <li>[516887576] High CVE-2026-17683: Inappropriate implementation in ANGLE.</li>
	    <li>[516894682] High CVE-2026-17684: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Chrome for iOS.</li>
	    <li>[516910278] High CVE-2026-17685: Use after free in Autofill.</li>
	    <li>[516917065] High CVE-2026-17686: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Passwords.</li>
	    <li>[516985726] High CVE-2026-17687: Type Confusion in ANGLE.</li>
	    <li>[517016413] High CVE-2026-17688: Use after free in Input.</li>
	    <li>[517045160] High CVE-2026-17689: Uninitialized Use in ANGLE.</li>
	    <li>[517129282] High CVE-2026-17690: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in PDF.</li>
	    <li>[517321292] High CVE-2026-17691: Out of bounds write in ANGLE.</li>
	    <li>[517350808] High CVE-2026-17692: Use after free in DataTransfer.</li>
	    <li>[517448723] High CVE-2026-17693: Inappropriate implementation in FileSystem.</li>
	    <li>[517511796] High CVE-2026-17694: Use after free in DOM.</li>
	    <li>[517543052] High CVE-2026-17695: Inappropriate implementation in ANGLE.</li>
	    <li>[517550034] High CVE-2026-17696: Side-channel information leakage in Media.</li>
	    <li>[517575864] High CVE-2026-17697: Type Confusion in ANGLE.</li>
	    <li>[517670731] High CVE-2026-17698: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in UI.</li>
	    <li>[517785292] High CVE-2026-17699: Use after free in Views.</li>
	    <li>[517789833] High CVE-2026-17700: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Actor.</li>
	    <li>[517972648] High CVE-2026-17701: Out of bounds read in ANGLE.</li>
	    <li>[517973093] High CVE-2026-17702: Inappropriate implementation in Skia.</li>
	    <li>[518051499] High CVE-2026-17703: Policy bypass in Chrome for iOS.</li>
	    <li>[519259107] High CVE-2026-17704: Use after free in ANGLE.</li>
	    <li>[519665978] High CVE-2026-17705: Integer overflow in libxml.</li>
	    <li>[519693032] High CVE-2026-17706: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Media.</li>
	    <li>[519701233] High CVE-2026-17707: Uninitialized Use in Media.</li>
	    <li>[519738647] High CVE-2026-17708: Use after free in Audio.</li>
	    <li>[519981494] High CVE-2026-17709: Race in Downloads.</li>
	    <li>[519991712] High CVE-2026-17710: Inappropriate implementation in MHTML.</li>
	    <li>[519996040] High CVE-2026-17711: Race in Downloads.</li>
	    <li>[520535595] High CVE-2026-17712: Race in Skia.</li>
	    <li>[520572766] High CVE-2026-17713: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Accessibility.</li>
	    <li>[521293438] High CVE-2026-17714: Uninitialized Use in ANGLE.</li>
	    <li>[521491778] High CVE-2026-17715: Inappropriate implementation in Passwords.</li>
	    <li>[521866061] High CVE-2026-17716: Use after free in Updater.</li>
	    <li>[522063116] High CVE-2026-17717: Integer overflow in ANGLE.</li>
	    <li>[522079372] High CVE-2026-17718: Use after free in ANGLE.</li>
	    <li>[522304853] High CVE-2026-17719: Use after free in Input.</li>
	    <li>[522545249] High CVE-2026-17720: Insufficient policy enforcement in Passwords.</li>
	    <li>[523495723] High CVE-2026-17721: Out of bounds write in ANGLE.</li>
	    <li>[523592755] High CVE-2026-17722: Object lifecycle issue in WebView.</li>
	    <li>[523718303] High CVE-2026-17723: Use after free in Media.</li>
	    <li>[523720739] High CVE-2026-17724: Race in Chrome for iOS.</li>
	    <li>[528501127] High CVE-2026-17725: Type Confusion in V8.</li>
	    <li>[529867799] High CVE-2026-17726: Integer overflow in WebGL.</li>
	    <li>[529932631] High CVE-2026-17727: Out of bounds write in WebGL.</li>
	    <li>[461167648] Medium CVE-2026-17728: Inappropriate implementation in Extensions.</li>
	    <li>[503801946] Medium CVE-2026-17758: Heap buffer overflow in Dawn.</li>
	    <li>[476646486] Medium CVE-2026-17732: Inappropriate implementation in SVG.</li>
	    <li>[520656237] Medium CVE-2026-17729: Use after free in V8.</li>
	    <li>[40057032] Medium CVE-2026-17730: Side-channel information leakage in Autofill.</li>
	    <li>[463551850] Medium CVE-2026-17731: Inappropriate implementation in Autofill.</li>
	    <li>[495793059] Medium CVE-2026-17733: Inappropriate implementation in QUIC.</li>
	    <li>[496304083] Medium CVE-2026-17734: Inappropriate implementation in Autofill.</li>
	    <li>[496569497] Medium CVE-2026-17735: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in BFCache.</li>
	    <li>[496715442] Medium CVE-2026-17736: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in WebView.</li>
	    <li>[498000415] Medium CVE-2026-17737: Use after free in Bluetooth.</li>
	    <li>[498079379] Medium CVE-2026-17738: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Payments.</li>
	    <li>[498353463] Medium CVE-2026-17739: Insufficient policy enforcement in Extensions.</li>
	    <li>[498827800] Medium CVE-2026-17740: Uninitialized Use in ANGLE.</li>
	    <li>[498877660] Medium CVE-2026-17741: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in WebView.</li>
	    <li>[499003233] Medium CVE-2026-17742: Insufficient policy enforcement in Payments.</li>
	    <li>[499204022] Medium CVE-2026-17743: Insufficient policy enforcement in ControlledFrame.</li>
	    <li>[500137309] Medium CVE-2026-17744: Inappropriate implementation in File Input.</li>
	    <li>[500172224] Medium CVE-2026-17745: Out of bounds read in Skia.</li>
	    <li>[500390256] Medium CVE-2026-17746: Use after free in GPU.</li>
	    <li>[500472958] Medium CVE-2026-17747: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Payments.</li>
	    <li>[500494349] Medium CVE-2026-17748: Inappropriate implementation in Extensions.</li>
	    <li>[500526602] Medium CVE-2026-17749: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Extensions.</li>
	    <li>[500560234] Medium CVE-2026-17750: Use after free in ANGLE.</li>
	    <li>[501591293] Medium CVE-2026-17751: Inappropriate implementation in AdFilter.</li>
	    <li>[501619207] Medium CVE-2026-17752: Use after free in Views.</li>
	    <li>[501628355] Medium CVE-2026-17753: Inappropriate implementation in Autofill.</li>
	    <li>[501675996] Medium CVE-2026-17754: Inappropriate implementation in Blink.</li>
	    <li>[501854535] Medium CVE-2026-17755: Incorrect security UI in Extensions.</li>
	    <li>[501980797] Medium CVE-2026-17756: Insufficient policy enforcement in Presentation.</li>
	    <li>[502351526] Medium CVE-2026-17757: Uninitialized Use in Skia.</li>
	    <li>[504650654] Medium CVE-2026-17759: Uninitialized Use in Codecs.</li>
	    <li>[506473189] Medium CVE-2026-17760: Side-channel information leakage in NoStatePrefetch.</li>
	    <li>[508249524] Medium CVE-2026-17761: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Chrome for iOS.</li>
	    <li>[508251844] Medium CVE-2026-17762: Inappropriate implementation in Chrome for iOS.</li>
	    <li>[511738693] Medium CVE-2026-17763: Inappropriate implementation in GPU.</li>
	    <li>[511754400] Medium CVE-2026-17764: Inappropriate implementation in FedCM.</li>
	    <li>[511765328] Medium CVE-2026-17765: Inappropriate implementation in WebProtect.</li>
	    <li>[511799537] Medium CVE-2026-17766: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Clipboard.</li>
	    <li>[511822402] Medium CVE-2026-17767: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in WebView.</li>
	    <li>[512999037] Medium CVE-2026-17768: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in WebSockets.</li>
	    <li>[513022076] Medium CVE-2026-17769: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Cast.</li>
	    <li>[513103345] Medium CVE-2026-17770: Out of bounds read in Media.</li>
	    <li>[513160525] Medium CVE-2026-17771: Uninitialized Use in Skia.</li>
	    <li>[513197846] Medium CVE-2026-17772: Out of bounds read in WebGL.</li>
	    <li>[513232523] Medium CVE-2026-17773: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Cast.</li>
	    <li>[513323066] Medium CVE-2026-17774: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Variations.</li>
	    <li>[513363822] Medium CVE-2026-17775: Inappropriate implementation in PresentationAPI.</li>
	    <li>[513404032] Medium CVE-2026-17776: Policy bypass in Receiver.</li>
	    <li>[513462236] Medium CVE-2026-17777: Inappropriate implementation in Autofill.</li>
	    <li>[513467993] Medium CVE-2026-17778: Use after free in Extensions.</li>
	    <li>[513478933] Medium CVE-2026-17779: Inappropriate implementation in Site Isolation.</li>
	    <li>[513485951] Medium CVE-2026-17780: Inappropriate implementation in Isolated Web Apps.</li>
	    <li>[513502990] Medium CVE-2026-17781: Inappropriate implementation in Extensions.</li>
	    <li>[513507830] Medium CVE-2026-17782: Incorrect security UI in Chrome for iOS.</li>
	    <li>[513532735] Medium CVE-2026-17783: Inappropriate implementation in Loader.</li>
	    <li>[513694032] Medium CVE-2026-17784: Use after free in Audio.</li>
	    <li>[513769898] Medium CVE-2026-17785: Uninitialized Use in ANGLE.</li>
	    <li>[513770449] Medium CVE-2026-17786: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in DevTools.</li>
	    <li>[513783632] Medium CVE-2026-17787: Inappropriate implementation in DevTools.</li>
	    <li>[513824957] Medium CVE-2026-17788: Inappropriate implementation in Blink.</li>
	    <li>[513855922] Medium CVE-2026-17789: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Chrome for iOS.</li>
	    <li>[513919931] Medium CVE-2026-17790: Uninitialized Use in ANGLE.</li>
	    <li>[514006959] Medium CVE-2026-17791: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Payments.</li>
	    <li>[514019823] Medium CVE-2026-17792: Inappropriate implementation in Credential Management.</li>
	    <li>[514063859] Medium CVE-2026-17793: Inappropriate implementation in Messages.</li>
	    <li>[514067070] Medium CVE-2026-17794: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Mobile.</li>
	    <li>[514242889] Medium CVE-2026-17795: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in GetUserMedia.</li>
	    <li>[514427844] Medium CVE-2026-17796: Side-channel information leakage in WebXR.</li>
	    <li>[514441966] Medium CVE-2026-17797: Inappropriate implementation in CSS.</li>
	    <li>[514460133] Medium CVE-2026-17798: Inappropriate implementation in Cast.</li>
	    <li>[514461031] Medium CVE-2026-17799: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Safe Browsing.</li>
	    <li>[514480948] Medium CVE-2026-17800: Side-channel information leakage in MediaRecording.</li>
	    <li>[514482938] Medium CVE-2026-17801: Out of bounds memory access in ANGLE.</li>
	    <li>[514512198] Medium CVE-2026-17802: Side-channel information leakage in GPU.</li>
	    <li>[515438919] Medium CVE-2026-17803: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Save to Drive.</li>
	    <li>[515448947] Medium CVE-2026-17804: Use after free in Media.</li>
	    <li>[516420806] Medium CVE-2026-17805: Insufficient policy enforcement in Glic.</li>
	    <li>[516433058] Medium CVE-2026-17806: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Extensions.</li>
	    <li>[516763884] Medium CVE-2026-17807: Use after free in V8.</li>
	    <li>[516778390] Medium CVE-2026-17808: Uninitialized Use in WebGL.</li>
	    <li>[516813317] Medium CVE-2026-17809: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Extensions.</li>
	    <li>[516882109] Medium CVE-2026-17810: Uninitialized Use in Dawn.</li>
	    <li>[516954622] Medium CVE-2026-17811: Use after free in ANGLE.</li>
	    <li>[517101596] Medium CVE-2026-17812: Inappropriate implementation in DigitalCredentials.</li>
	    <li>[517184957] Medium CVE-2026-17813: Insufficient policy enforcement in Chrome for iOS.</li>
	    <li>[517312048] Medium CVE-2026-17814: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Chrome for iOS.</li>
	    <li>[517427352] Medium CVE-2026-17815: Insufficient policy enforcement in GuestView.</li>
	    <li>[517429672] Medium CVE-2026-17816: Inappropriate implementation in Speech.</li>
	    <li>[517461759] Medium CVE-2026-17817: Inappropriate implementation in ReportingAndNEL.</li>
	    <li>[517466133] Medium CVE-2026-17818: Inappropriate implementation in Network.</li>
	    <li>[517487028] Medium CVE-2026-17819: Inappropriate implementation in WebAppInstalls.</li>
	    <li>[517493101] Medium CVE-2026-17820: Insufficient policy enforcement in Autofill.</li>
	    <li>[517597914] Medium CVE-2026-17821: Insufficient policy enforcement in Extensions.</li>
	    <li>[517621178] Medium CVE-2026-17822: Inappropriate implementation in Chrome for iOS.</li>
	    <li>[517628043] Medium CVE-2026-17823: Insufficient policy enforcement in WebXR.</li>
	    <li>[517655543] Medium CVE-2026-17824: Insufficient policy enforcement in ServiceWorker.</li>
	    <li>[517675979] Medium CVE-2026-17825: Insufficient policy enforcement in Passwords.</li>
	    <li>[517690521] Medium CVE-2026-17826: Inappropriate implementation in Chrome for iOS.</li>
	    <li>[517693726] Medium CVE-2026-17827: Inappropriate implementation in CSS.</li>
	    <li>[517702279] Medium CVE-2026-17828: Inappropriate implementation in Chrome for iOS.</li>
	    <li>[517705103] Medium CVE-2026-17829: Insufficient policy enforcement in Passwords.</li>
	    <li>[517710397] Medium CVE-2026-17830: Inappropriate implementation in Chrome for iOS.</li>
	    <li>[517714728] Medium CVE-2026-17831: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Passwords.</li>
	    <li>[517723319] Medium CVE-2026-17832: Use after free in ANGLE.</li>
	    <li>[517779123] Medium CVE-2026-17833: Inappropriate implementation in Passwords.</li>
	    <li>[517793801] Medium CVE-2026-17834: Inappropriate implementation in Passwords.</li>
	    <li>[517801739] Medium CVE-2026-17835: Inappropriate implementation in Chrome for iOS.</li>
	    <li>[517972812] Medium CVE-2026-17836: Use after free in V8.</li>
	    <li>[517978932] Medium CVE-2026-17837: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in DevTools.</li>
	    <li>[518075952] Medium CVE-2026-17838: Incorrect security UI in Chrome for iOS.</li>
	    <li>[518080978] Medium CVE-2026-17839: Inappropriate implementation in Chrome for iOS.</li>
	    <li>[518082162] Medium CVE-2026-17840: Incorrect security UI in Passwords.</li>
	    <li>[518088219] Medium CVE-2026-17841: Race in Chrome for iOS.</li>
	    <li>[518089997] Medium CVE-2026-17842: Inappropriate implementation in Chrome for iOS.</li>
	    <li>[518103887] Medium CVE-2026-17843: Inappropriate implementation in CSS.</li>
	    <li>[518111542] Medium CVE-2026-17844: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Cast.</li>
	    <li>[518112775] Medium CVE-2026-17845: Inappropriate implementation in CSS.</li>
	    <li>[518121320] Medium CVE-2026-17846: Inappropriate implementation in Media.</li>
	    <li>[518243653] Medium CVE-2026-17847: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in ANGLE.</li>
	    <li>[518284253] Medium CVE-2026-17848: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Codecs.</li>
	    <li>[518812672] Medium CVE-2026-17849: Inappropriate implementation in Chrome for iOS.</li>
	    <li>[519078527] Medium CVE-2026-17850: Inappropriate implementation in Permissions.</li>
	    <li>[519243927] Medium CVE-2026-17851: Side-channel information leakage in Autofill.</li>
	    <li>[519348818] Medium CVE-2026-17852: Inappropriate implementation in Media Router.</li>
	    <li>[519472272] Medium CVE-2026-17853: Inappropriate implementation in DevTools.</li>
	    <li>[519500882] Medium CVE-2026-17854: Insufficient policy enforcement in WebMCP.</li>
	    <li>[519982572] Medium CVE-2026-17855: Race in DevTools.</li>
	    <li>[519991751] Medium CVE-2026-17856: Inappropriate implementation in Network.</li>
	    <li>[520186620] Medium CVE-2026-17857: Inappropriate implementation in Network.</li>
	    <li>[520191468] Medium CVE-2026-17858: Uninitialized Use in WebNN.</li>
	    <li>[520196753] Medium CVE-2026-17859: Side-channel information leakage in Favicons.</li>
	    <li>[520407381] Medium CVE-2026-17860: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Mobile.</li>
	    <li>[520417861] Medium CVE-2026-17861: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Updater.</li>
	    <li>[520426287] Medium CVE-2026-17862: Use after free in Tracing.</li>
	    <li>[520468718] Medium CVE-2026-17863: Inappropriate implementation in Browser.</li>
	    <li>[520494861] Medium CVE-2026-17864: Inappropriate implementation in Updater.</li>
	    <li>[520516655] Medium CVE-2026-17865: Inappropriate implementation in Crypto.</li>
	    <li>[520525732] Medium CVE-2026-17866: Type Confusion in Tab.</li>
	    <li>[520527496] Medium CVE-2026-17867: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Dawn.</li>
	    <li>[520743499] Medium CVE-2026-17868: Insufficient policy enforcement in USB.</li>
	    <li>[521759269] Medium CVE-2026-17869: Out of bounds read in WebXR.</li>
	    <li>[521784856] Medium CVE-2026-17870: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Cast.</li>
	    <li>[521938924] Medium CVE-2026-17871: Inappropriate implementation in Passwords.</li>
	    <li>[521963740] Medium CVE-2026-17872: Cryptographic Flaw in WebAppInstalls.</li>
	    <li>[522074033] Medium CVE-2026-17873: Insufficient policy enforcement in Chrome for iOS.</li>
	    <li>[522074154] Medium CVE-2026-17874: Inappropriate implementation in Chrome for iOS.</li>
	    <li>[522299155] Medium CVE-2026-17875: Use after free in PDFium.</li>
	    <li>[522425471] Medium CVE-2026-17876: Inappropriate implementation in Payments.</li>
	    <li>[522426086] Medium CVE-2026-17877: Inappropriate implementation in Chromoting.</li>
	    <li>[522781838] Medium CVE-2026-17878: Inappropriate implementation in CSS.</li>
	    <li>[522878450] Medium CVE-2026-17879: Inappropriate implementation in Autofill.</li>
	    <li>[523229759] Medium CVE-2026-17880: Inappropriate implementation in Autofill.</li>
	    <li>[523477987] Medium CVE-2026-17881: Use after free in WebXR.</li>
	    <li>[523637452] Medium CVE-2026-17882: Policy bypass in Extensions.</li>
	    <li>[523639090] Medium CVE-2026-17883: Inappropriate implementation in Headless.</li>
	    <li>[523692228] Medium CVE-2026-17884: Object lifecycle issue in WebRTC.</li>
	    <li>[523698038] Medium CVE-2026-17885: Inappropriate implementation in Paint.</li>
	    <li>[523715964] Medium CVE-2026-17886: Use after free in Enterprise.</li>
	    <li>[523717010] Medium CVE-2026-17887: Use after free in TabStrip.</li>
	    <li>[523720529] Medium CVE-2026-17888: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in WebUI.</li>
	    <li>[523735357] Medium CVE-2026-17889: Uninitialized Use in WebXR.</li>
	    <li>[524029061] Medium CVE-2026-17890: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in DevTools.</li>
	    <li>[524639223] Medium CVE-2026-17891: Use after free in ANGLE.</li>
	    <li>[524822998] Medium CVE-2026-17892: Inappropriate implementation in WebXR.</li>
	    <li>[524824730] Medium CVE-2026-17893: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Updater.</li>
	    <li>[524825209] Medium CVE-2026-17894: Use after free in Views.</li>
	    <li>[524931675] Medium CVE-2026-17895: Inappropriate implementation in DataTransfer.</li>
	    <li>[525331547] Medium CVE-2026-17896: Use after free in DevTools.</li>
	    <li>[527665262] Medium CVE-2026-17897: Inappropriate implementation in ORB.</li>
	    <li>[506193577] Low CVE-2026-17898: Use after free in DevTools.</li>
	    <li>[375959766] Low CVE-2026-17899: Insufficient policy enforcement in DevTools.</li>
	    <li>[496195854] Low CVE-2026-17900: Inappropriate implementation in Enterprise.</li>
	    <li>[496271098] Low CVE-2026-17901: Inappropriate implementation in Sharing.</li>
	    <li>[497251066] Low CVE-2026-17902: Inappropriate implementation in Editing.</li>
	    <li>[497277880] Low CVE-2026-17903: Insufficient policy enforcement in Chromecast.</li>
	    <li>[497337759] Low CVE-2026-17904: Insufficient policy enforcement in NFC.</li>
	    <li>[497366217] Low CVE-2026-17905: Inappropriate implementation in SurfaceCapture.</li>
	    <li>[497654761] Low CVE-2026-17906: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Bluetooth.</li>
	    <li>[497837927] Low CVE-2026-17907: Side-channel information leakage in Network.</li>
	    <li>[499062890] Low CVE-2026-17908: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Printing.</li>
	    <li>[501693236] Low CVE-2026-17909: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Isolated Web Apps.</li>
	    <li>[501749600] Low CVE-2026-17910: Insufficient policy enforcement in NFC.</li>
	    <li>[502505715] Low CVE-2026-17911: Insufficient policy enforcement in SVG.</li>
	    <li>[504202939] Low CVE-2026-17912: Inappropriate implementation in Chrome for iOS.</li>
	    <li>[504209246] Low CVE-2026-17913: Inappropriate implementation in Chrome for iOS.</li>
	    <li>[506377118] Low CVE-2026-17914: Side-channel information leakage in Skia.</li>
	    <li>[506390325] Low CVE-2026-17915: Inappropriate implementation in WebView.</li>
	    <li>[510808598] Low CVE-2026-17916: Insufficient policy enforcement in Settings.</li>
	    <li>[511816897] Low CVE-2026-17917: Policy bypass in Chrome for iOS.</li>
	    <li>[513127137] Low CVE-2026-17918: Use after free in Sync.</li>
	    <li>[513291747] Low CVE-2026-17919: Insufficient policy enforcement in Enterprise.</li>
	    <li>[513413942] Low CVE-2026-17920: Use after free in V8.</li>
	    <li>[513503197] Low CVE-2026-17921: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Navigation.</li>
	    <li>[513611659] Low CVE-2026-17922: Inappropriate implementation in Enterprise.</li>
	    <li>[513612928] Low CVE-2026-17923: Policy bypass in Enterprise.</li>
	    <li>[513714124] Low CVE-2026-17924: Use after free in DNS.</li>
	    <li>[513719671] Low CVE-2026-17925: Inappropriate implementation in Cast.</li>
	    <li>[513735900] Low CVE-2026-17926: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in DevTools.</li>
	    <li>[513754837] Low CVE-2026-17927: Insufficient policy enforcement in DevTools.</li>
	    <li>[513762372] Low CVE-2026-17928: Inappropriate implementation in DataTransfer.</li>
	    <li>[513768645] Low CVE-2026-17929: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in DevTools.</li>
	    <li>[513769158] Low CVE-2026-17930: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Extensions.</li>
	    <li>[513781245] Low CVE-2026-17931: Inappropriate implementation in DevTools.</li>
	    <li>[513819157] Low CVE-2026-17932: Use after free in DataTransfer.</li>
	    <li>[513822044] Low CVE-2026-17933: Inappropriate implementation in DOMStorage.</li>
	    <li>[513838421] Low CVE-2026-17934: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in DevTools.</li>
	    <li>[513863267] Low CVE-2026-17935: Heap buffer overflow in Codecs.</li>
	    <li>[513864014] Low CVE-2026-17936: Inappropriate implementation in DevTools.</li>
	    <li>[513866380] Low CVE-2026-17937: Inappropriate implementation in DevTools.</li>
	    <li>[513989304] Low CVE-2026-17938: Inappropriate implementation in FullScreen.</li>
	    <li>[514060089] Low CVE-2026-17939: Inappropriate implementation in Passwords.</li>
	    <li>[514069440] Low CVE-2026-17940: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Picture-in-Picture.</li>
	    <li>[514147906] Low CVE-2026-17941: Inappropriate implementation in Chrome for iOS.</li>
	    <li>[514406198] Low CVE-2026-17942: Side-channel information leakage in SVG.</li>
	    <li>[514424283] Low CVE-2026-17943: Inappropriate implementation in Parser.</li>
	    <li>[514510853] Low CVE-2026-17944: Inappropriate implementation in Chrome for iOS.</li>
	    <li>[514519203] Low CVE-2026-17945: Inappropriate implementation in Navigation.</li>
	    <li>[515437522] Low CVE-2026-17946: Uninitialized Use in Dawn.</li>
	    <li>[515438256] Low CVE-2026-17947: Use after free in WebSockets.</li>
	    <li>[516849257] Low CVE-2026-17948: Type Confusion in V8.</li>
	    <li>[517000034] Low CVE-2026-17949: Uninitialized Use in GPU.</li>
	    <li>[517063658] Low CVE-2026-17950: Policy bypass in Safebrowsing.</li>
	    <li>[517180511] Low CVE-2026-17951: Heap buffer overflow in WebRTC.</li>
	    <li>[517316174] Low CVE-2026-17952: Inappropriate implementation in V8.</li>
	    <li>[517335150] Low CVE-2026-17953: Insufficient policy enforcement in WebView.</li>
	    <li>[517383492] Low CVE-2026-17954: Policy bypass in MHTML.</li>
	    <li>[517385072] Low CVE-2026-17955: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Payments.</li>
	    <li>[517436171] Low CVE-2026-17956: Inappropriate implementation in Scheduling.</li>
	    <li>[517476342] Low CVE-2026-17957: Inappropriate implementation in CORS.</li>
	    <li>[517538206] Low CVE-2026-17958: Inappropriate implementation in Views.</li>
	    <li>[517607890] Low CVE-2026-17959: Inappropriate implementation in Network.</li>
	    <li>[517631680] Low CVE-2026-17960: Inappropriate implementation in Chrome for iOS.</li>
	    <li>[517700791] Low CVE-2026-17961: Inappropriate implementation in Session.</li>
	    <li>[517757268] Low CVE-2026-17962: Inappropriate implementation in Blink.</li>
	    <li>[517759257] Low CVE-2026-17963: Inappropriate implementation in SVG.</li>
	    <li>[518025103] Low CVE-2026-17964: Incorrect security UI in UI.</li>
	    <li>[518049812] Low CVE-2026-17965: Incorrect security UI in Chrome for iOS.</li>
	    <li>[518058990] Low CVE-2026-17966: Inappropriate implementation in Views.</li>
	    <li>[518243858] Low CVE-2026-17967: Use after free in Chrome for iOS.</li>
	    <li>[518337516] Low CVE-2026-17968: Uninitialized Use in WebXR.</li>
	    <li>[518812295] Low CVE-2026-17969: Inappropriate implementation in Passwords.</li>
	    <li>[518814464] Low CVE-2026-17970: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Passwords.</li>
	    <li>[518815075] Low CVE-2026-17971: Inappropriate implementation in Frame.</li>
	    <li>[519202895] Low CVE-2026-17972: Inappropriate implementation in Chrome for iOS.</li>
	    <li>[519230894] Low CVE-2026-17973: Inappropriate implementation in Views.</li>
	    <li>[519232592] Low CVE-2026-17974: Insufficient policy enforcement in DevTools.</li>
	    <li>[519233776] Low CVE-2026-17975: Inappropriate implementation in IME.</li>
	    <li>[519455164] Low CVE-2026-17976: Policy bypass in Extensions.</li>
	    <li>[519603552] Low CVE-2026-17977: Policy bypass in CSS.</li>
	    <li>[519610845] Low CVE-2026-17978: Side-channel information leakage in WebCodecs.</li>
	    <li>[519664497] Low CVE-2026-17979: Race in V8.</li>
	    <li>[519710361] Low CVE-2026-17980: Inappropriate implementation in UI.</li>
	    <li>[519719512] Low CVE-2026-17981: Inappropriate implementation in Blink.</li>
	    <li>[519735808] Low CVE-2026-17982: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Cast.</li>
	    <li>[519744561] Low CVE-2026-17983: Incorrect security UI in Global Media Controls.</li>
	    <li>[519978460] Low CVE-2026-17984: Inappropriate implementation in Browser.</li>
	    <li>[519981430] Low CVE-2026-17985: Insufficient policy enforcement in Speech.</li>
	    <li>[519981896] Low CVE-2026-17986: Insufficient policy enforcement in Bluetooth.</li>
	    <li>[519988071] Low CVE-2026-17987: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Notifications.</li>
	    <li>[520005624] Low CVE-2026-17988: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Navigation.</li>
	    <li>[520017306] Low CVE-2026-17989: Type Confusion in V8.</li>
	    <li>[520018012] Low CVE-2026-17990: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in WebAuthn.</li>
	    <li>[520110535] Low CVE-2026-17991: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in AI.</li>
	    <li>[520506316] Low CVE-2026-17992: Uninitialized Use in Skia.</li>
	    <li>[520532191] Low CVE-2026-17993: Race in Updater.</li>
	    <li>[520663771] Low CVE-2026-17994: Inappropriate implementation in Media.</li>
	    <li>[520972775] Low CVE-2026-17995: Out of bounds read in Dawn.</li>
	    <li>[521473427] Low CVE-2026-17996: Inappropriate implementation in Browser.</li>
	    <li>[521476960] Low CVE-2026-17997: Inappropriate implementation in Passwords.</li>
	    <li>[521601450] Low CVE-2026-17998: Incorrect security UI in Extensions.</li>
	    <li>[521615681] Low CVE-2026-17999: Incorrect security UI in PictureInPicture.</li>
	    <li>[521623907] Low CVE-2026-18000: Insufficient policy enforcement in USB.</li>
	    <li>[521757779] Low CVE-2026-18001: Inappropriate implementation in WebGL.</li>
	    <li>[521864362] Low CVE-2026-18002: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Google Lens.</li>
	    <li>[521934304] Low CVE-2026-18003: Inappropriate implementation in Chrome for iOS.</li>
	    <li>[522280805] Low CVE-2026-18004: Insufficient policy enforcement in Speech.</li>
	    <li>[522300211] Low CVE-2026-18005: Inappropriate implementation in WebXR.</li>
	    <li>[522396262] Low CVE-2026-18006: Inappropriate implementation in Google Lens.</li>
	    <li>[522404101] Low CVE-2026-18007: Inappropriate implementation in Input.</li>
	    <li>[522412676] Low CVE-2026-18008: Inappropriate implementation in Settings.</li>
	    <li>[522419718] Low CVE-2026-18009: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Passwords.</li>
	    <li>[522419819] Low CVE-2026-18010: Inappropriate implementation in Passwords.</li>
	    <li>[522479633] Low CVE-2026-18011: Inappropriate implementation in Chrome for iOS.</li>
	    <li>[522938824] Low CVE-2026-18012: Use after free in PDFium.</li>
	    <li>[523245998] Low CVE-2026-18013: Inappropriate implementation in Chrome for iOS.</li>
	    <li>[523248021] Low CVE-2026-18014: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in DevTools.</li>
	    <li>[523698428] Low CVE-2026-18015: Inappropriate implementation in Tint.</li>
	    <li>[523708527] Low CVE-2026-18016: Insufficient policy enforcement in Chrome for iOS.</li>
	    <li>[523731236] Low CVE-2026-18017: Use after free in Dawn.</li>
	    <li>[524467747] Low CVE-2026-18018: Inappropriate implementation in Updater.</li>
	    <li>[525691898] Low CVE-2026-18019: Side-channel information leakage in Media.</li>
	 </ul>
       </blockquote>
      </body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17650</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17651</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17652</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17653</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17654</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17655</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17656</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17657</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17658</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17659</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17660</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17661</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17662</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17663</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17664</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17665</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17666</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17667</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17668</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17669</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17670</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17671</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17672</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17673</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17674</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17675</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17676</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17677</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17678</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17679</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17680</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17681</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17682</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17683</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17684</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17685</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17686</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17687</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17688</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17689</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17690</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17691</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17692</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17693</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17694</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17695</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17696</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17697</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17698</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17699</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17700</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17701</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17702</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17703</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17704</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17705</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17706</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17707</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17708</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17709</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17710</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17711</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17712</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17713</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17714</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17715</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17716</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17717</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17718</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17719</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17720</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17721</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17722</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17723</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17724</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17725</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17726</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17727</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17728</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17758</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17732</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17729</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17730</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17731</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17733</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17734</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17735</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17736</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17737</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17738</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17739</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17740</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17741</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17742</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17743</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17744</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17745</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17746</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17747</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17748</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17749</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17750</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17751</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17752</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17753</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17754</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17755</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17756</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17757</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17759</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17760</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17761</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17762</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17763</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17764</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17765</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17766</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17767</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17768</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17769</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17770</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17771</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17772</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17773</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17774</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17775</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17776</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17777</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17778</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17779</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17780</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17781</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17782</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17783</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17784</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17785</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17786</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17787</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17788</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17789</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17790</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17791</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17792</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17793</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17794</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17795</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17796</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17797</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17798</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17799</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17800</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17801</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17802</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17803</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17804</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17805</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17806</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17807</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17808</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17809</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17810</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17811</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17812</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17813</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17814</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17815</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17816</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17817</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17818</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17819</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17820</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17821</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17822</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17823</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17824</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17825</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17826</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17827</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17828</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17829</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17830</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17831</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17832</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17833</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17834</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17835</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17836</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17837</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17838</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17839</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17840</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17841</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17842</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17843</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17844</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17845</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17846</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17847</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17848</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17849</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17850</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17851</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17852</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17853</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17854</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17855</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17856</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17857</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17858</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17859</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17860</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17861</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17862</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17863</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17864</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17865</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17866</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17867</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17868</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17869</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17870</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17871</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17872</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17873</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17874</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17875</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17876</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17877</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17878</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17879</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17880</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17881</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17882</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17883</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17884</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17885</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17886</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17887</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17888</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17889</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17890</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17891</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17892</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17893</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17894</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17895</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17896</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17897</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17898</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17899</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17900</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17901</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17902</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17903</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17904</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17905</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17906</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17907</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17908</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17909</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17910</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17911</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17912</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17913</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17914</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17915</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17916</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17917</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17918</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17919</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17920</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17921</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17922</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17923</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17924</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17925</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17926</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17927</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17928</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17929</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17930</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17931</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17932</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17933</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17934</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17935</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17936</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17937</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17938</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17939</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17940</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17941</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17942</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17943</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17944</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17945</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17946</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17947</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17948</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17949</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17950</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17951</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17952</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17953</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17954</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17955</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17956</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17957</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17958</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17959</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17960</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17961</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17962</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17963</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17964</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17965</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17966</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17967</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17968</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17969</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17970</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17971</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17972</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17973</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17974</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17975</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17976</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17977</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17978</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17979</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17980</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17981</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17982</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17983</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17984</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17985</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17986</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17987</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17988</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17989</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17990</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17991</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17992</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17993</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17994</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17995</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17996</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17997</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17998</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-17999</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-18000</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-18001</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-18002</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-18003</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-18004</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-18005</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-18006</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-18007</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-18008</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-18009</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-18010</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-18011</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-18012</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-18013</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-18014</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-18015</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-18016</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-18017</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-18018</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-18019</cvename>
      <url>https://chromereleases.googleblog.com/2026/07/stable-channel-update-for-desktop_0887107924.html</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-07-29</discovery>
      <entry>2026-07-30</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="661d3db5-8bd9-11f1-9c40-2cf05da270f3">
    <topic>Gitlab -- vulnerabilities</topic>
    <affects>
<package>
	<name>gitlab-ce</name>
	<name>gitlab-ee</name>
	<range><ge>19.2.0</ge><lt>19.2.1</lt></range>
	<range><ge>19.1.0</ge><lt>19.1.3</lt></range>
	<range><ge>8.8.0</ge><lt>19.0.5</lt></range>
</package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>Gitlab reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://docs.gitlab.com/releases/patches/patch-release-gitlab-19-2-1-released/?nav=19.2.1">
	  <p>Sensitive Information Exposure issue in Workhorse impacts GitLab CE/EE</p>
	  <p>Mass Assignment issue in Pipeline Schedule API impacts GitLab CE/EE</p>
	  <p>Denial of Service issue in Merge Request Discussions impacts GitLab CE/EE</p>
	  <p>Race Condition issue in merge request approval rules impacts GitLab EE</p>
	  <p>Insufficiently Protected Credentials issue in Virtual Registries impacts GitLab EE</p>
	  <p>Improper Access Control issue in project import status impacts GitLab CE/EE</p>
	  <p>Improper Authorization issue in project import functionality impacts GitLab CE/EE</p>
	  <p>Cross-site Scripting issue in paginated views impacts GitLab CE/EE</p>
	  <p>Prompt Injection issue in Duo Code Review impacts GitLab EE</p>
	  <p>Incorrect Security Token Generation issue in Duo Workflows impacts GitLab EE</p>
	  <p>Exposure of Sensitive Information issue in merge request title generation impacts GitLab CE/EE</p>
	  <p>Improper Access Control issue in Pipeline Test Report API impacts GitLab CE/EE</p>
	  <p>Incorrect Authorization issue in merge request collaboration settings impacts GitLab CE/EE</p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-6267</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-12436</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-15975</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13113</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-16553</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-6336</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-14341</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-3093</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-15077</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-15831</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-14351</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-4672</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2025-14562</cvename>
      <url>https://docs.gitlab.com/releases/patches/patch-release-gitlab-19-2-1-released/?nav=19.2.1</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-07-29</discovery>
      <entry>2026-07-30</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="ced14fa7-8bb8-11f1-a6ab-bc241121aa0a">
    <topic>FreeBSD -- Race condition in ELF core dump segment counting</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
	<name>FreeBSD-kernel</name>
	<range><ge>15.1</ge><lt>15.1_2</lt></range>
	<range><ge>15.0</ge><lt>15.0_12</lt></range>
	<range><ge>14.4</ge><lt>14.4_8</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<h1>Problem Description:</h1>
	  <p>The ELF core dump code counted the number of dumpable VM map
	  entries, allocated a buffer for the corresponding program headers,
	  then iterated over the map a second time to populate them.  A process
	  sharing the address space via rfork(2) can mutate the map between
	  the two passes, causing the second pass to write program headers
	  past the end of the buffer.</p>
	<h1>Impact:</h1>
	  <p>An unprivileged local user sharing an address space with a
	  process that dumps core can trigger an out-of-bounds write on the
	  kernel heap, potentially leading to privilege escalation.</p>
      </body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-58088</cvename>
      <freebsdsa>SA-26:55.elf</freebsdsa>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-07-29</discovery>
      <entry>2026-07-30</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="aa5f956e-8bb8-11f1-a6ab-bc241121aa0a">
    <topic>FreeBSD -- Heap out-of-bounds access in semctl(2)</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
	<name>FreeBSD-kernel</name>
	<range><ge>15.1</ge><lt>15.1_2</lt></range>
	<range><ge>15.0</ge><lt>15.0_12</lt></range>
	<range><ge>14.4</ge><lt>14.4_8</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<h1>Problem Description:</h1>
	  <p>The GETALL and SETALL commands in semctl(2) recorded the number
	  of semaphores in the target set, dropped the lock protecting the
	  set, allocated a buffer sized for that count, and reacquired the
	  lock.  A sequence-number check was used to verify that the set had
	  not been replaced in the interim, but the sequence number wraps
	  after 0x8000 create/destroy cycles.  By rapidly destroying and
	  recreating semaphore sets at the same index, another process can
	  cause the sequence number to wrap, allowing a set with a different
	  number of semaphores to pass validation.  The subsequent copy then
	  reads or writes past the end of the allocated buffer.</p>
	<h1>Impact:</h1>
	  <p>An unprivileged local user can trigger out-of-bounds reads and
	  writes on kernel heap memory, potentially leading to privilege
	  escalation.</p>
      </body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-58087</cvename>
      <freebsdsa>SA-26:54.sysvsem</freebsdsa>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-07-29</discovery>
      <entry>2026-07-30</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="73482c83-8bb8-11f1-a6ab-bc241121aa0a">
    <topic>FreeBSD -- ktrace(2) privilege incorrectly validated in jails</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
	<name>FreeBSD-kernel</name>
	<range><ge>15.1</ge><lt>15.1_2</lt></range>
	<range><ge>15.0</ge><lt>15.0_12</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<h1>Problem Description:</h1>
	  <p>As an inadvertent side effect of an unrelated code change,
	  PRIV_KTRACE was always denied to a jailed root user.  Tracing
	  configured by a jailed root user was therefore not flagged as
	  privileged.</p>
	<h1>Impact:</h1>
	  <p>An unprivileged user in a jail that has permission to debug the
	  target process can modify the jailed root user's ktrace(2) flags,
	  or disable tracing outright.  A jailed root user therefore cannot
	  reliably trace unprivileged processes.</p>
      </body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-58086</cvename>
      <freebsdsa>SA-26:53.ktrace</freebsdsa>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-07-29</discovery>
      <entry>2026-07-30</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="3840a83e-8bb8-11f1-a6ab-bc241121aa0a">
    <topic>FreeBSD -- Missing MAC validation in wg(4) packet decryption</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
	<name>FreeBSD-kernel</name>
	<range><ge>15.1</ge><lt>15.1_2</lt></range>
	<range><ge>15.0</ge><lt>15.0_12</lt></range>
	<range><ge>14.4</ge><lt>14.4_8</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<h1>Problem Description:</h1>
	  <p>After dispatching a decrypt operation to OCF and receiving the
	  result, the wg(4) driver failed to check whether the MAC verification
	  step succeeded.  The driver thus silently accepted packets with an
	  invalid Poly1305 authentication tag.</p>
	<h1>Impact:</h1>
	  <p>A remote attacker who can send UDP packets to a WireGuard
	  endpoint, and who can guess the bounds of the receiver's replay
	  window, can inject forged or modified transport data packets into
	  the tunnel.</p>
	  <p>A remote attacker who can intercept WireGuard packets bound for a
	  FreeBSD host can modify the ciphertext and authenticated data without
	  detection by the receiver.</p>
      </body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-58085</cvename>
      <freebsdsa>SA-26:52.if_wg</freebsdsa>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-07-29</discovery>
      <entry>2026-07-30</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="eab90fc5-8bb7-11f1-a6ab-bc241121aa0a">
    <topic>FreeBSD -- Kernel stack disclosure via timer_settime(2)</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
	<name>FreeBSD-kernel</name>
	<range><ge>15.1</ge><lt>15.1_2</lt></range>
	<range><ge>15.0</ge><lt>15.0_12</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<h1>Problem Description:</h1>
	  <p>To retrieve the previous timer value, the kernel calls
	  realtimer_gettime(), which obtains the current time for the timer's
	  clock.  For a timer using CLOCK_TAI this can fail when no TAI offset
	  has been configured, but the error return was not checked, so the
	  uninitialized output buffer was copied to userspace.</p>
	<h1>Impact:</h1>
	  <p>An unprivileged local user can obtain uninitialized kernel stack
	  memory by creating a POSIX timer with CLOCK_TAI and calling
	  timer_settime(2), potentially disclosing sensitive kernel data.</p>
      </body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-58084</cvename>
      <freebsdsa>SA-26:51.ktimer</freebsdsa>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-07-29</discovery>
      <entry>2026-07-30</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="a4e4a74c-8bb7-11f1-a6ab-bc241121aa0a">
    <topic>FreeBSD -- Use-after-free in kqueue copy-on-fork</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
	<name>FreeBSD-kernel</name>
	<range><ge>15.1</ge><lt>15.1_2</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<h1>Problem Description:</h1>
	  <p>While the kernel was copying knotes during fork, a knote with
	  a timer-based filter could fire and be enqueued on the kqueue's
	  active list before the copy was complete.  The copy routine did not
	  account for this and could enqueue the new knote a second time,
	  corrupting the active list.  In addition, the copy routine did not
	  hold the appropriate locks while reading knote state, allowing
	  further races.</p>
	<h1>Impact:</h1>
	  <p>An unprivileged local user can trigger a use-after-free in the
	  kernel, potentially leading to privilege escalation.</p>
      </body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-58083</cvename>
      <freebsdsa>SA-26:50.kqueue</freebsdsa>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-07-29</discovery>
      <entry>2026-07-30</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="c4005254-b922-430f-b94a-dac9f59a527b">
    <topic>chromium -- security fixes</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
       <name>chromium</name>
       <range><lt>150.0.7871.186</lt></range>
      </package>
      <package>
       <name>ungoogled-chromium</name>
       <range><lt>150.0.7871.186</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
       <p>Chrome Releases reports:</p>
       <blockquote cite="https://chromereleases.googleblog.com/2026/07/stable-channel-update-for-desktop_01320465736.html">
	 <p>This update includes 4 security fixes:</p>
	 <ul>
	    <li>[518237034] High CVE-2026-16807: Out of bounds write in Codecs.</li>
	    <li>[522064153] High CVE-2026-16806: Use after free in WebMCP.</li>
	    <li>[523292588] High CVE-2026-16805: Use after free in Blink.</li>
	    <li>[524721670] High CVE-2026-16804: Use after free in Input.</li>
	 </ul>
       </blockquote>
      </body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-16807</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-16806</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-16805</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-16804</cvename>
      <url>https://chromereleases.googleblog.com/2026/07/stable-channel-update-for-desktop_01320465736.html</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-07-23</discovery>
      <entry>2026-07-29</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="82122f4b-6fad-4b83-bd1a-5b036b135080">
    <topic>chromium -- security fixes</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
       <name>chromium</name>
       <range><lt>150.0.7871.181</lt></range>
      </package>
      <package>
       <name>ungoogled-chromium</name>
       <range><lt>150.0.7871.181</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
       <p>Chrome Releases reports:</p>
       <blockquote cite="https://chromereleases.googleblog.com/2026/07/stable-channel-update-for-desktop_0256605430.html">
	 <p>This update includes 12 security fixes:</p>
	 <ul>
	    <li>[527930356] High CVE-2026-16420: Type Confusion in WebAudio.</li>
	    <li>[528276487] High CVE-2026-16421: Inappropriate implementation in WebAudio.</li>
	    <li>[517359779] High CVE-2026-16413: Out of bounds write in ANGLE.</li>
	    <li>[517651910] High CVE-2026-16414: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Chromecast.</li>
	    <li>[519244446] High CVE-2026-16415: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Extensions.</li>
	    <li>[520172356] High CVE-2026-16416: Integer overflow in Chromecast.</li>
	    <li>[521491024] High CVE-2026-16417: Uninitialized Use in Skia.</li>
	    <li>[522125255] High CVE-2026-16418: Stack buffer overflow in V8.</li>
	    <li>[523435970] High CVE-2026-16419: Out of bounds read and write in ANGLE.</li>
	    <li>[533515002] High CVE-2026-16422: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Certificate.</li>
	    <li>[534582496] High CVE-2026-16423: Use after free in UI.</li>
	    <li>[534858939] High CVE-2026-16424: Use after free in GPU.</li>
	 </ul>
       </blockquote>
      </body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-16420</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-16421</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-16413</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-16414</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-16415</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-16416</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-16417</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-16418</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-16419</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-16422</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-16423</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-16424</cvename>
      <url>https://chromereleases.googleblog.com/2026/07/stable-channel-update-for-desktop_0256605430.html</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-07-21</discovery>
      <entry>2026-07-29</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="3acf4890-b59c-4265-9867-2cf1ae6869f2">
    <topic>chromium -- security fixes</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
       <name>chromium</name>
       <range><lt>150.0.7871.128</lt></range>
      </package>
      <package>
       <name>ungoogled-chromium</name>
       <range><lt>150.0.7871.128</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
       <p>Chrome Releases reports:</p>
       <blockquote cite="https://chromereleases.googleblog.com/2026/07/stable-channel-update-for-desktop_049796704.html">
	 <p>This update includes 7 security fixes:</p>
	 <ul>
	    <li>[516987782] Critical CVE-2026-15899: Use after free in CameraCapture.</li>
	    <li>[523750584] Critical CVE-2026-15900: Use after free in GPU.</li>
	    <li>[533446300] Critical CVE-2026-15901: Use after free in Network.</li>
	    <li>[522436154] High CVE-2026-15902: Use after free in Cast.</li>
	    <li>[531503216] High CVE-2026-15903: Out of bounds read and write in V8.</li>
	    <li>[532925350] High CVE-2026-15904: Use after free in Ozone.</li>
	    <li>[532970574] High CVE-2026-15905: Use after free in Aura.</li>
	 </ul>
       </blockquote>
      </body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-15899</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-15900</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-15901</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-15902</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-15903</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-15904</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-15905</cvename>
      <url>https://chromereleases.googleblog.com/2026/07/stable-channel-update-for-desktop_049796704.html</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-07-16</discovery>
      <entry>2026-07-29</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="5e1d97cf-4b04-48ae-9eb4-57a943d2d3ea">
    <topic>chromium -- security fixes</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
       <name>chromium</name>
       <range><lt>150.0.7871.124</lt></range>
      </package>
      <package>
       <name>ungoogled-chromium</name>
       <range><lt>150.0.7871.124</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
       <p>Chrome Releases reports:</p>
       <blockquote cite="https://chromereleases.googleblog.com/2026/07/stable-channel-update-for-desktop_0353146366.html">
	 <p>This update includes 15 security fixes:</p>
	 <ul>
	    <li>[517100492] Critical CVE-2026-15764: Use after free in Ozone.</li>
	    <li>[518007484] Critical CVE-2026-15765: Use after free in Ozone.</li>
	    <li>[514010477] High CVE-2026-15766: Uninitialized Use in Skia.</li>
	    <li>[514748734] High CVE-2026-15767: Heap buffer overflow in libyuv.</li>
	    <li>[517931625] High CVE-2026-15768: Insufficient policy enforcement in HTML-in-Canvas.</li>
	    <li>[519731111] High CVE-2026-15769: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Linux Toolkit Theming.</li>
	    <li>[524792614] High CVE-2026-15770: Uninitialized Use in V8.</li>
	    <li>[525177160] High CVE-2026-15771: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Media.</li>
	    <li>[525317502] High CVE-2026-15772: Use after free in GPU.</li>
	    <li>[527676561] High CVE-2026-15773: Use after free in Core.</li>
	    <li>[530646115] High CVE-2026-15774: Use after free in Skia.</li>
	    <li>[531319201] High CVE-2026-15775: Insufficient policy enforcement in V8.</li>
	    <li>[532595489] High CVE-2026-15776: Type Confusion in V8.</li>
	    <li>[532929679] High CVE-2026-15777: Use after free in UI.</li>
	    <li>[513795122] Medium CVE-2026-15778: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Navigation.</li>
	 </ul>
       </blockquote>
      </body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-15764</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-15765</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-15766</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-15767</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-15768</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-15769</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-15770</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-15771</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-15772</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-15773</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-15774</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-15775</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-15776</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-15777</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-15778</cvename>
      <url>https://chromereleases.googleblog.com/2026/07/stable-channel-update-for-desktop_0353146366.html</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-07-14</discovery>
      <entry>2026-07-29</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="35a830f6-8aab-11f1-a744-b42e991fc52e">
    <topic>GoLand -- Multiple vulnerabilities</topic>
    <affects>
    <package>
	<name>jetbrains-goland</name>
	<range><lt>2026.2</lt></range>
    </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>https://www.jetbrains.com/privacy-security/issues-fixed/ reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://www.jetbrains.com/privacy-security/issues-fixed/">
	<ul>
	<li>
	  In JetBrains GoLand before 2026.2 arbitrary code execution
	  was possible before granting project trust in the Go
	  Modules integration
	</li>
	<li>
	  In JetBrains GoLand before 2026.2 sensitive configuration
	  values written to log files by default
	</li>
	</ul>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-64802</cvename>
      <url>https://cveawg.mitre.org/api/cve/CVE-2026-64802</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-07-23</discovery>
      <entry>2026-07-28</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="b579bbde-8aa2-11f1-a744-b42e991fc52e">
    <topic>Mozilla -- Memory safety bugs</topic>
    <affects>
    <package>
	<name>firefox</name>
	<range><lt>152.0.0,2</lt></range>
    </package>
    <package>
	<name>firefox-esr</name>
	<range><lt>140.12,2</lt></range>
    </package>
    <package>
	<name>thunderbird</name>
	<range><lt>140.13</lt></range>
    </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	  <p>https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/security/advisories/mfsa2026-68/#CVE-2026-16360 reports:</p>
	  <blockquote cite="https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/security/advisories/mfsa2026-68/#CVE-2026-16360">
	  <p>
	    Memory safety bugs present in Firefox ESR 115.37,
	    Firefox ESR 140.12 and Firefox 152. Some of these bugs
	    showed evidence of memory corruption and we presume that
	    with enough effort some of these could have been
	    exploited to run arbitrary code.
	  </p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-16360</cvename>
      <url>https://cveawg.mitre.org/api/cve/CVE-2026-16360</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-07-21</discovery>
      <entry>2026-07-28</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="b36c7feb-8aa2-11f1-a744-b42e991fc52e">
    <topic>Mozilla -- Memory safety bugs</topic>
    <affects>
    <package>
	<name>firefox</name>
	<range><lt>153.0.0,2</lt></range>
    </package>
    <package>
	<name>firefox-esr</name>
	<range><lt>140.13,2</lt></range>
    </package>
    <package>
	<name>thunderbird</name>
	<range><lt>153.0.0</lt></range>
    </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	  <p>https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/security/advisories/mfsa2026-68/#CVE-2026-16412 reports:</p>
	  <blockquote cite="https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/security/advisories/mfsa2026-68/#CVE-2026-16412">
	  <p>
	    Memory safety bugs present in Firefox ESR 140.12 and
	    Firefox 152. Some of these bugs showed evidence of
	    memory corruption and we presume that with enough effort
	    some of these could have been exploited to run arbitrary
	    code.
	  </p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-16412</cvename>
      <url>https://cveawg.mitre.org/api/cve/CVE-2026-16412</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-07-21</discovery>
      <entry>2026-07-28</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="aca6684f-8aa2-11f1-a744-b42e991fc52e">
    <topic>Mozilla -- Memory safety bugs</topic>
    <affects>
    <package>
	<name>firefox</name>
	<range><lt>153.0.0,2</lt></range>
    </package>
    <package>
	<name>thunderbird</name>
	<range><lt>153.0.0</lt></range>
    </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	  <p>https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/security/advisories/mfsa2026-68/#CVE-2026-16411 reports</p>
	  <blockquote cite="https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/security/advisories/mfsa2026-68/#CVE-2026-16411">
	  <p>
	    Memory safety bugs present in Firefox 152. Some of
	    these bugs showed evidence of memory corruption and we
	    presume that with enough effort some of these could have
	    been exploited to run arbitrary code.
	  </p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-16411</cvename>
      <url>https://cveawg.mitre.org/api/cve/CVE-2026-16411</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-07-21</discovery>
      <entry>2026-07-28</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="52a3f202-8a77-11f1-ac5d-0897988a1c07">
    <topic>mailpit -- WebSocket origin check bypass via percent-encoded path</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
	<name>mailpit</name>
	<range><lt>1.30.6</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>Mailpit author reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://github.com/axllent/mailpit/security/advisories/GHSA-8r62-w5wh-fc5m">
	  <p>The cross-site WebSocket hijacking fix was reimplemented
	  as an origin check gated on a raw-URI prefix test, but
	  Go's ServeMux routes on the percent-decoded path, so
	  requesting /%61pi/events reaches the WebSocket handler
	  while skipping the only origin control, and the upgrader
	  itself accepts every origin.</p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <url>https://github.com/axllent/mailpit/security/advisories/GHSA-8r62-w5wh-fc5m</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-07-28</discovery>
      <entry>2026-07-28</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="445c61c0-89e1-11f1-b35c-4c526214c986">
    <topic>Erlang/OTP -- (D)TLS-1.2 server certificate verification bypass</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
	<name>erlang</name>
	<range><lt>28.5.0.4,4</lt></range>
      </package>
      <package>
	<name>erlang-runtime27</name>
	<range><lt>27.3.4.15</lt></range>
      </package>
      <package>
	<name>erlang-runtime28</name>
	<range><lt>28.5.0.4</lt></range>
      </package>
      <package>
	<name>erlang-runtime29</name>
	<range><lt>29.0.4</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>https://github.com/erlang/otp/security/advisories/GHSA-c6cw-pr89-w882 reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://github.com/erlang/otp/security/advisories/GHSA-c6cw-pr89-w882">
	  <p>The OTP TLS/DTLS client (pre TLS-1.3) does not verify that
	  the cipher suite selected by the server in ServerHello is one
	  of those offered in ClientHello. A man-in-the-middle attacker
	  can select an anonymous cipher suite such as ECDH_anon that
	  was never offered by the client. Since anonymous suites do not
	  require a server certificate, this completely bypasses the
	  client's verify_peer setting, giving the attacker a fully
	  established connection without possessing any trusted
	  certificate, and thus complete read and modify access to the
	  transmitted data. TLS-1.3 is not affected.</p>
	</blockquote>
      </body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-55953</cvename>
      <url>https://github.com/erlang/otp/security/advisories/GHSA-c6cw-pr89-w882</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-07-27</discovery>
      <entry>2026-07-27</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="445d3f14-89e1-11f1-b35c-4c526214c986">
    <topic>Erlang/OTP -- TLS denial of service using invalid certificate chains</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
	<name>erlang</name>
	<range><ge>23.2,4</ge><lt>28.5.0.4,4</lt></range>
      </package>
      <package>
	<name>erlang-runtime27</name>
	<range><lt>27.3.4.15</lt></range>
      </package>
      <package>
	<name>erlang-runtime28</name>
	<range><lt>28.5.0.4</lt></range>
      </package>
      <package>
	<name>erlang-runtime29</name>
	<range><lt>29.0.4</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>https://github.com/erlang/otp/security/advisories/GHSA-r5jr-mq46-vmhw reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://github.com/erlang/otp/security/advisories/GHSA-r5jr-mq46-vmhw">
	  <p>A TLS/DTLS peer can crash the remote node by sending a
	  certificate chain containing two mutually cross-signed
	  certificates in unordered form. When the receiving side
	  attempts to build a valid chain path, it enters unbounded
	  recursion between the two certificates (A issues B, B issues
	  A) with no cycle detection or depth limit. The call stack and
	  chain accumulator grow without bound until the process
	  exhausts available memory and the BEAM node crashes.</p>
	</blockquote>
      </body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-58227</cvename>
      <url>https://github.com/erlang/otp/security/advisories/GHSA-r5jr-mq46-vmhw</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-07-27</discovery>
      <entry>2026-07-27</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="445d674f-89e1-11f1-b35c-4c526214c986">
    <topic>Erlang/OTP -- denial of service via exponential certificate policy tree growth</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
	<name>erlang</name>
	<range><ge>26.2,4</ge><lt>28.5.0.4,4</lt></range>
      </package>
      <package>
	<name>erlang-runtime27</name>
	<range><lt>27.3.4.15</lt></range>
      </package>
      <package>
	<name>erlang-runtime28</name>
	<range><lt>28.5.0.4</lt></range>
      </package>
      <package>
	<name>erlang-runtime29</name>
	<range><lt>29.0.4</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>https://github.com/erlang/otp/security/advisories/GHSA-622p-qfh6-c352 reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://github.com/erlang/otp/security/advisories/GHSA-622p-qfh6-c352">
	  <p>A remote attacker can trigger a denial of service through
	  TLS certificate handling. By sending a specially crafted
	  certificate chain with multiple certificate policies at each
	  level, the policy tree expands exponentially during validation,
	  growing as M^K nodes (where M is the number of policies per
	  certificate and K is the chain depth). This pins schedulers
	  and exhausts memory without any authentication. Any
	  application using SSL/TLS that validates certificate paths is
	  affected, as are direct calls to
	  public_key:pkix_path_validation/3.</p>
	</blockquote>
      </body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-59251</cvename>
      <url>https://github.com/erlang/otp/security/advisories/GHSA-622p-qfh6-c352</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-07-27</discovery>
      <entry>2026-07-27</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="445da2cc-89e1-11f1-b35c-4c526214c986">
    <topic>Erlang/OTP -- megaco flex scanner buffer overflow</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
	<name>erlang</name>
	<range><lt>28.5.0.4,4</lt></range>
      </package>
      <package>
	<name>erlang-runtime27</name>
	<range><lt>27.3.4.15</lt></range>
      </package>
      <package>
	<name>erlang-runtime28</name>
	<range><lt>28.5.0.4</lt></range>
      </package>
      <package>
	<name>erlang-runtime29</name>
	<range><lt>29.0.4</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>https://github.com/erlang/otp/security/advisories/GHSA-7xgh-gmgf-q2g7 reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://github.com/erlang/otp/security/advisories/GHSA-7xgh-gmgf-q2g7">
	  <p>A remote unauthenticated attacker can crash Erlang nodes
	  running the megaco text codec with the flex scanner option by
	  sending an H.248/Megaco message with a property parm name
	  exceeding 452 bytes. The overflow occurs in a C linked-in
	  driver, causing the entire BEAM VM process to terminate. It is
	  reachable pre-authentication, as the flex scanner processes
	  raw TCP payloads before protocol validation.</p>
	</blockquote>
      </body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-59250</cvename>
      <url>https://github.com/erlang/otp/security/advisories/GHSA-7xgh-gmgf-q2g7</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-07-27</discovery>
      <entry>2026-07-27</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="445dc6b9-89e1-11f1-b35c-4c526214c986">
    <topic>Erlang/OTP -- binary_to_term crash on crafted BIT_BINARY_EXT input</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
	<name>erlang</name>
	<range><ge>27.0,4</ge><lt>28.5.0.4,4</lt></range>
      </package>
      <package>
	<name>erlang-runtime27</name>
	<range><lt>27.3.4.15</lt></range>
      </package>
      <package>
	<name>erlang-runtime28</name>
	<range><lt>28.5.0.4</lt></range>
      </package>
      <package>
	<name>erlang-runtime29</name>
	<range><lt>29.0.4</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>https://github.com/erlang/otp/security/advisories/GHSA-54pw-5645-jh86 reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://github.com/erlang/otp/security/advisories/GHSA-54pw-5645-jh86">
	  <p>A specially crafted External Term Format (ETF) payload of
	  merely 7 bytes triggers a crash in the BEAM virtual machine
	  when processed by binary_to_term/1,2. The BIT_BINARY_EXT tag
	  with specific parameters causes an unsigned integer underflow
	  during bitstring size calculation, resulting in an enormous
	  memory allocation attempt that immediately terminates the VM.
	  This is a full system crash, not a recoverable process
	  exception: Erlang supervision mechanisms, the [safe] option
	  and standard error handling cannot prevent it.</p>
	</blockquote>
      </body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-54890</cvename>
      <url>https://github.com/erlang/otp/security/advisories/GHSA-54pw-5645-jh86</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-07-27</discovery>
      <entry>2026-07-27</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="445df078-89e1-11f1-b35c-4c526214c986">
    <topic>Erlang/OTP -- heap corruption decoding invalidly encoded large tuples</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
	<name>erlang</name>
	<range><lt>28.5.0.4,4</lt></range>
      </package>
      <package>
	<name>erlang-runtime27</name>
	<range><lt>27.3.4.15</lt></range>
      </package>
      <package>
	<name>erlang-runtime28</name>
	<range><lt>28.5.0.4</lt></range>
      </package>
      <package>
	<name>erlang-runtime29</name>
	<range><lt>29.0.4</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>The Erlang/OTP team reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://github.com/erlang/otp/releases/tag/OTP-29.0.4">
	  <p>Fixed heap corruption when an invalidly encoded tuple with
	  an arity of 2^31 or larger is decoded from Erlang's External
	  Term Format (binary_to_term).</p>
	</blockquote>
      </body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-55737</cvename>
      <url>https://github.com/erlang/otp/releases/tag/OTP-29.0.4</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-07-27</discovery>
      <entry>2026-07-27</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="445e11d4-89e1-11f1-b35c-4c526214c986">
    <topic>Erlang/OTP -- relative path traversal in the zip module</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
	<name>erlang</name>
	<range><lt>28.5.0.4,4</lt></range>
      </package>
      <package>
	<name>erlang-runtime27</name>
	<range><lt>27.3.4.15</lt></range>
      </package>
      <package>
	<name>erlang-runtime28</name>
	<range><lt>28.5.0.4</lt></range>
      </package>
      <package>
	<name>erlang-runtime29</name>
	<range><lt>29.0.4</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>The Erlang/OTP team reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://github.com/erlang/otp/releases/tag/OTP-29.0.4">
	  <p>Fixed a bug where zip:unzip/1,2 and zip:extract/1,2 were
	  vulnerable to a relative path traversal attack. A crafted zip
	  archive containing entry names such as ../x/y could have
	  caused files to be written outside the intended extraction
	  directory.</p>
	</blockquote>
      </body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-47078</cvename>
      <url>https://github.com/erlang/otp/releases/tag/OTP-29.0.4</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-07-27</discovery>
      <entry>2026-07-27</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="445e3324-89e1-11f1-b35c-4c526214c986">
    <topic>Erlang/OTP -- denial of service in epmd</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
	<name>erlang</name>
	<range><lt>28.5.0.4,4</lt></range>
      </package>
      <package>
	<name>erlang-runtime27</name>
	<range><lt>27.3.4.15</lt></range>
      </package>
      <package>
	<name>erlang-runtime28</name>
	<range><lt>28.5.0.4</lt></range>
      </package>
      <package>
	<name>erlang-runtime29</name>
	<range><lt>29.0.4</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>The Erlang/OTP team reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://github.com/erlang/otp/releases/tag/OTP-29.0.4">
	  <p>Mitigated a denial of service attack in epmd.</p>
	</blockquote>
      </body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-42792</cvename>
      <url>https://github.com/erlang/otp/releases/tag/OTP-29.0.4</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-07-27</discovery>
      <entry>2026-07-27</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="68b8de3a-8821-11f1-b72c-8447094a420f">
    <topic>Vaultwarden -- multiple vulnerabilities</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
	<name>vaultwarden</name>
	<range><lt>1.37.0</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>The Vaultwarden project reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://github.com/dani-garcia/vaultwarden/releases/tag/1.37.0">
	  <ul>
	    <li>SSRF via the icon endpoint [GHSA-hw4g-2v3f-74x5] [GHSA-vh5m-fc9v-m84g] (Medium, 5.8 / 6.3)</li>
	    <li>Cross-Organization Cipher Access [GHSA-xwf8-pjh7-h589] (Medium, 5.9)</li>
	    <li>Organization Policy Bypass on Directory Import [GHSA-88qc-6ch9-mc3j] (Medium, 5.5)</li>
	    <li>Send Access-Count Bypass [GHSA-rxhg-2pw9-vf25] (Medium, 5.3)</li>
	    <li>Unauthenticated WebSocket Flooding DDOS [GHSA-96f7-78q5-j345] (Medium, 5.3)</li>
	    <li>Cross-Organization Secret Sharing [GHSA-455c-vgg9-jxw8] (Medium, 4.3)</li>
	    <li>Organization Import Authorization [GHSA-f3qw-qg77-hmm4][GHSA-jq2g-h4xr-4mcr] (Medium, 4.3)</li>
	    <li>Organization Data Enumeration via the Manager role [GHSA-rqf8-2568-r7mc] (Medium, 4.3)</li>
	  </ul>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <url>https://github.com/dani-garcia/vaultwarden/releases/tag/1.37.0</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-07-24</discovery>
      <entry>2026-07-25</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="f63b4b88-6901-4c12-b13d-5a821e25e9bf">
    <topic>unbound -- multiple vulnerabilities</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
	<name>unbound</name>
	<range><lt>1.25.2</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>NLnet Labs reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://github.com/NLnetLabs/unbound/releases/tag/release-1.25.2">
	  <p>This release consolidates security fixes for issues reported
	    over a period of time. There are fixes for:</p>
	  <ul>
	    <li>CVE-2026-14586: Assertion in libngtcp2 when under pressure
	      in high concurrency DNS-over-QUIC environments.</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-32665: Remote DNS-over-QUIC denial of service due to
	      quic-size budget bypass.</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-40691: Packet of death for DNSCrypt over TCP.</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-41637: Degradation of resolution service from
	      improperly accounted client-terminated DNS-over-QUIC
	      queries.</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-42955: Extra fix for CVE-2026-40622 to also clamp the
	      TTL of A/AAAA records disallowing a one-time 'ghost domain'
	      delegation renewal via glue records.</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-44621: Libunbound applications configured with
	      'unwanted-reply-threshold' could eventually be abruptly
	      terminated.</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-44687: Off-by-one error in 'harden-below-nxdomain'
	      logic can shadow a stub/forward zone by a legitimate parent's
	      NXDOMAIN.</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-44690: Cross-zone wildcard cache poisoning via
	      RRSIG.labels manipulation.</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-46582: A wildcard replay, as another piece of data,
	      triggers poisoning in the serve expired reply path.</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-50045: 'max-global-quota' reset by DNSSEC validation
	      restarts.</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-50046: Possible heap use-after-free in an error path
	      when a DoT forwarded query is jostled out.</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-50243: 'response-ip'/'rpz' can rewrite BOGUS answers
	      instead of returning SERVFAIL.</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-50248: BOGUS configured primary hostname accepted for
	      XFR in auth/rpz zones.</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-50251: Attacker supplied 0.0.0.0/:: glue triggers
	      defensive full-cache flush.</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-50252: Possible cache poisoning attack by mapping
	      source port population per thread.</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-52863: Memory corruption could lead to crash and
	      denial of service.</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-54478: DNS Cookie bypass when combined with
	      proxy-protocol use.</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-55708: Privacy/configuration issue when adding local
	      data in views through 'unbound-control'.</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-55717: 'serve-expired-client-timeout' and 'response-ip'
	      CNAME redirect could lead to a crash.</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-55973: 'dns-error-reporting: yes' leads to stack
	      buffer overflow.</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-55990: Packet of death for a DNSCrypt misconfigured
	      Unbound.</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-55991: Remote DNS-over-QUIC (DoQ) flow-control
	      assertion failure in libngtcp2.</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-56416: Possible heap buffer overflow when validator
	      canonicalizes RDATA that contains domain name.</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-56444: Degradation of resolution service when
	      'discard-timeout' and 'serve-expired-client-timeout' are
	      combined in unusual configuration.</li>
	  </ul>
	</blockquote>
      </body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-14586</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-32665</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-40691</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-41637</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-42955</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-44621</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-44687</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-44690</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-46582</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-50045</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-50046</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-50243</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-50248</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-50251</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-50252</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-52863</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-54478</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-55708</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-55717</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-55973</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-55990</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-55991</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-56416</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-56444</cvename>
      <url>https://github.com/NLnetLabs/unbound/releases/tag/release-1.25.2</url>
      <url>https://www.nlnetlabs.nl/projects/unbound/security-advisories/</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-07-22</discovery>
      <entry>2026-07-25</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="6eee35e6-fca5-4db2-ab73-f27add3e3ef1">
    <topic>gstreamer1 -- multiple vulnerabilities</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
	<name>gstreamer1-plugins</name>
	<name>gstreamer1-plugins-bad</name>
	<name>gstreamer1-plugins-good</name>
	<name>gstreamer1-plugins-ugly</name>
	<range><lt>1.28.5</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>The GStreamer project reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://gstreamer.freedesktop.org/security/">
	  <p>Multiple security issues were identified and fixed in the GStreamer framework.</p>
	  <ul>
	    <li>GStreamer-SA-2026-0044: Out-of-bounds read in RTP CELT audio depayloader</li>
	    <li>GStreamer-SA-2026-0049: Heap buffer overflow in MPEG-4 Video parser</li>
	    <li>GStreamer-SA-2026-0050: Heap buffer overflow in MOV/MP4 moov recovery tool</li>
	    <li>GStreamer-SA-2026-0051: Out-of-bounds read in RTP SBC depayloader</li>
	    <li>GStreamer-SA-2026-0052: Heap buffer overflow in GdkPixbuf image decoder due to dimension changes</li>
	    <li>GStreamer-SA-2026-0053: Stack and heap buffer overflow in Opus audio decoder</li>
	    <li>GStreamer-SA-2026-0054: Heap buffer overflow in encoding-target loader on malformed UTF-8 input</li>
	    <li>GStreamer-SA-2026-0055: Out-of-bounds read in H.266/VVC parser PPS tile slice loop</li>
	    <li>GStreamer-SA-2026-0056: Heap-based buffer overflow in H.266 video parser slice header processing</li>
	    <li>GStreamer-SA-2026-0057: Out-of-bounds read in RTP JPEG depayloader</li>
	    <li>GStreamer-SA-2026-0058: Out-of-bounds read in ASF demuxer packet payload parsing</li>
	    <li>GStreamer-SA-2026-0059: Out-of-bounds read in VP9 parser superframe index parsing</li>
	    <li>GStreamer-SA-2026-0060: Stack-based out-of-bounds write in closed caption converter</li>
	    <li>GStreamer-SA-2026-0061: Possible authentication bypass in WebRTC SDP fingerprint validation</li>
	    <li>GStreamer-SA-2026-0062: Stack buffer overflow in DTLS certificate verification</li>
	    <li>GStreamer-SA-2026-0063: Heap out-of-bounds write in RFB source when decoding framebuffer updates</li>
	    <li>GStreamer-SA-2026-0064: NULL pointer dereference in WAV parser during adtl chunk parsing in streaming mode</li>
	    <li>GStreamer-SA-2026-0065: Integer overflow in Matroska LZO1X decompressor</li>
	  </ul>
	</blockquote>
      </body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-2920</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-14935</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-59691</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-59692</cvename>
      <url>https://gstreamer.freedesktop.org/security/sa-2026-0044.html</url>
      <url>https://gstreamer.freedesktop.org/security/sa-2026-0049.html</url>
      <url>https://gstreamer.freedesktop.org/security/sa-2026-0050.html</url>
      <url>https://gstreamer.freedesktop.org/security/sa-2026-0051.html</url>
      <url>https://gstreamer.freedesktop.org/security/sa-2026-0052.html</url>
      <url>https://gstreamer.freedesktop.org/security/sa-2026-0053.html</url>
      <url>https://gstreamer.freedesktop.org/security/sa-2026-0054.html</url>
      <url>https://gstreamer.freedesktop.org/security/sa-2026-0055.html</url>
      <url>https://gstreamer.freedesktop.org/security/sa-2026-0056.html</url>
      <url>https://gstreamer.freedesktop.org/security/sa-2026-0057.html</url>
      <url>https://gstreamer.freedesktop.org/security/sa-2026-0058.html</url>
      <url>https://gstreamer.freedesktop.org/security/sa-2026-0059.html</url>
      <url>https://gstreamer.freedesktop.org/security/sa-2026-0060.html</url>
      <url>https://gstreamer.freedesktop.org/security/sa-2026-0061.html</url>
      <url>https://gstreamer.freedesktop.org/security/sa-2026-0062.html</url>
      <url>https://gstreamer.freedesktop.org/security/sa-2026-0063.html</url>
      <url>https://gstreamer.freedesktop.org/security/sa-2026-0064.html</url>
      <url>https://gstreamer.freedesktop.org/security/sa-2026-0065.html</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-07-08</discovery>
      <entry>2026-07-24</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="dd6096e6-8555-11f1-b4c7-00a0980083d7">
    <topic>giflib -- Buffer Overflow vulnerability</topic>
    <affects>
    <package>
	<name>giflib</name>
	<range><lt>6.1.3</lt></range>
    </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>https://github.com/zakkanijia/POC/blob/main/giflib/giftool/giflib_giftool_gce_len_heap_oobwrite_disclosure.md reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://github.com/zakkanijia/POC/blob/main/giflib/giftool/giflib_giftool_gce_len_heap_oobwrite_disclosure.md">
	  <p>Buffer Overflow vulnerability in giflib v.5.2.2 allows a remote
	  attacker to cause a denial of service via the EGifGCBToExtension
	  overwriting an existing Graphic Control Extension block without
	  validating its allocated size.</p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-26740</cvename>
      <url>https://cveawg.mitre.org/api/cve/CVE-2026-26740</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-03-18</discovery>
      <entry>2026-07-21</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="037b7b00-84d4-11f1-8f76-345a6001a2f9">
    <topic>srt -- Multiple vulnerabilities</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
	<name>srt</name>
	<range><lt>1.5.6</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>The SRT project reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://github.com/Haivision/srt/releases/tag/v1.5.6">
	  <ul>
	    <li>CVE-2026-55869: Heap-Based Buffer Overflow in KMREQ Handling.
	      A remote attacker may be able to trigger a heap-based buffer
	      overflow during key material request processing, leading to a
	      denial of service or potentially arbitrary code execution.</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-55868: Encryption State Machine Downgrade.
	      A flaw in the encryption state machine may allow an attacker to
	      downgrade the negotiated encryption, weakening confidentiality
	      protections for the SRT stream.</li>
	  </ul>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-55869</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-55868</cvename>
      <url>https://github.com/Haivision/srt/releases/tag/v1.5.6</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-07-20</discovery>
      <entry>2026-07-21</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="f4c57c5a-845a-11f1-b72c-8447094a420f">
    <topic>Weechat -- Multiple vulnerabilities</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
	<name>weechat</name>
	<range><lt>4.9.4</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>The Weechat project reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://github.com/weechat/weechat/releases/tag/v4.9.4">
	  <p>Write of logger file outside of configured path.</p>
	  <p>Authentication bypass in Relay plugin, protocols "api" and "weechat".</p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <url>https://github.com/weechat/weechat/releases/tag/v4.9.4</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-07-19</discovery>
      <entry>2026-07-20</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="562ff91e-8407-11f1-bfde-10ffe07f9334">
    <topic>Mailpit -- SMTP DATA line reader buffers over-limit input before size enforcement</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
	<name>mailpit</name>
	<range><lt>1.30.5</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>Mailpit author reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://github.com/axllent/mailpit/security/advisories/GHSA-r553-m4fv-5v97">
	  <p>Mailpit's SMTP DATA reader enforces the configured
	  MaxMessageSize only after bufio.Reader.ReadBytes('\n')
	  has already buffered a complete DATA line. A remote
	  unauthenticated SMTP client can send one line larger than
	  the configured message-size cap and force memory allocation
	  before Mailpit returns the expected 552 5.3.4 rejection,
	  leaving patched versions still exposed to a single-line
	  incomplete-fix variant of the earlier SMTP DATA body-size
	  issue.</p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <url>https://github.com/axllent/mailpit/security/advisories/GHSA-r553-m4fv-5v97</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-07-20</discovery>
      <entry>2026-07-20</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="272a2772-8367-11f1-82b9-901b0e9408dc">
    <topic>tailscale -- Multiple vulnerabilities</topic>
    <affects>
<package>
<name>tailscale</name>
<range><lt>1.98.10</lt></range>
</package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>Tailscale team reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://tailscale.com/changelog#2026-07-14">
	  <p>Tailscale SSH Unix socket forwarding respects symlink
	  permissions. This fix addresses a security vulnerability
	  described in TS-2026-004.</p>
	  <p>Tailscale Serve Unix socket proxy targets are restricted
	  to the root user. This fix addresses a security
	  vulnerability described in TS-2026-005.</p>
	  <p>Tailscale SSH does not allow the use of UIDs or
	  numeric-only usernames. This fix addresses a security
	  vulnerability described in TS-2026-006.</p>
	  <p>Nodes advertising Tailscale Services filter and reject
	  packets from service IPs on ports they do not
	  advertise. This fix addresses a security vulnerability
	  described in TS-2026-007.</p>
	  <p>Tailscale Serve and Tailscale Funnel terminate path walks
	  for non-absolute paths, preventing CPU core pinning. This
	  fix addresses a security vulnerability described in
	  TS-2026-008.</p>
	  <p>Tailscale SSH does not allow the use of usernames with
	  leading dashes. This fix addresses a security vulnerability
	  described in TS-2026-009.</p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <url>https://tailscale.com/changelog#2026-07-14</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-06-03</discovery>
      <entry>2026-07-19</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="9645fcd7-82a1-11f1-8c96-5404a68ad561">
    <topic>traefik -- Multiple vulnerabilities</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
      <name>traefik</name>
      <range><lt>3.7.8</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
      <p>The traefik project releases a new version addressing multiple vulnerabilities:</p>
      <blockquote cite="https://github.com/traefik/traefik/releases/tag/v3.7.7">
      <ul>
      <li>GHSA-cxjq-mrr5-89rv (Authentication Bypass via Path Traversal in ReplacePathRegex Middleware)</li>
      <li>GHSA-42cj-m3vj-89wv (CRD IngressRouteTCP ServersTransport Cross-Provider Namespace Bypass)</li>
      <li>GHSA-qq9q-x9w4-chhj (Gateway API HTTPRoute BackendRef ExtensionRef Namespace Confusion)</li>
      </ul>
      </blockquote>
      <blockquote cite="https://github.com/traefik/traefik/releases/tag/v3.7.8">
      <ul>
      <li>GHSA-8rxv-jg7p-wvg3 (Kubernetes Ingress NGINX RewriteTarget Path Traversal Allows Route-Level Authentication Bypass)</li>
      </ul>
      </blockquote>
      </body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <url>https://github.com/traefik/traefik/releases/tag/v3.7.7</url>
      <url>https://github.com/traefik/traefik/releases/tag/v3.7.8</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-07-08</discovery>
      <entry>2026-07-18</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="0a0aca9f-8290-11f1-a93b-50ebf6bdf8e9">
    <topic>phpmyfaq -- multiple vulnerabilities</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
	<name>phpmyfaq-php83</name>
	<name>phpmyfaq-php84</name>
	<name>phpmyfaq-php85</name>
	<range><lt>4.1.6</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>phpMyFAQ team reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://www.phpmyfaq.de/security/advisory-2026-07-13/">
	  <p>An authenticated administrator can supply an untrusted
	    update-package path to the configuration API, causing phpMyFAQ
	    to write an arbitrary PHP file to the server and thereby
	    execute attacker-controlled code.</p>
	  <p>An attacker can exploit a path traversal in the category image
	    deletion routine to remove arbitrary files outside the intended
	    directory, which can leave the installation in a state that
	    allows a setup takeover.</p>
	  <p>The two-factor authentication login flow can be completed
	    without verifying the password factor, so an attacker who
	    possesses only the second factor is able to authenticate as the
	    victim.</p>
	  <p>A delegated administrator with only the GROUP_EDIT permission
	    can assign group memberships without restriction through
	    GroupController::updateMembers, inheriting rights they do not
	    hold and escalating their privileges.</p>
	  <p>An authenticated user can inject SQL through an unescaped stop
	    word inserted via StopWords::add(), allowing manipulation of the
	    underlying database query.</p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <url>https://www.phpmyfaq.de/security/advisory-2026-07-13/</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-07-13</discovery>
      <entry>2026-07-18</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="56feeac6-8263-11f1-92ba-bc24110523fe">
    <topic>nginx -- multiple vulnerabilities</topic>
    <affects>
    <package>
	<name>nginx</name>
	<range><lt>1.30.4,3</lt></range>
    </package>
    <package>
	<name>nginx-devel</name>
	<range><lt>1.31.3</lt></range>
    </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>The nginx development team reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://nginx.org/en/security_advisories.html">
	  <p>Buffer overflow when using map and regex
	    (CVE-2026-42533). Severity: major.</p>
	  <p>Memory disclosure when using ngx_http_slice_module
	    (CVE-2026-60005). Severity: medium.</p>
	  <p>Use-after-free when using ngx_http_ssi_module
	    (CVE-2026-56434). Severity: medium.</p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-42533</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-56434</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-60005</cvename>
      <url>https://nginx.org/en/security_advisories.html</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-07-15</discovery>
      <entry>2026-07-18</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="e26b9011-80ef-11f1-b72c-8447094a420f">
    <topic>liboqs -- Multiple vulnerabilities</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
	<name>liboqs</name>
	<range><lt>0.16.0</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>The OpenQuantumSafe project reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://github.com/open-quantum-safe/liboqs/releases/tag/0.16.0">
	  <ul>
	    <li>uninitialized encaps_derand pointer dereference</li>
	    <li>out-of-bounds read in XMSS/XMSS^MT signature verification</li>
	    <li>Integer underflow in CROSS crypto_sign_open()</li>
	    <li>incorrect array size when calling secure_clean</li>
	    <li>Implemented optimization barrier OQS_MEM_BLACK_BOX and applied to ct_select in FrodoKEM</li>
	  </ul>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <url>https://github.com/open-quantum-safe/liboqs/releases/tag/0.16.0</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-07-09</discovery>
      <entry>2026-07-16</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="74d0291e-7f81-11f1-83e9-901b0e13f1a0">
    <topic>Poppler: integer overflow in tilingPatternFill</topic>
    <affects>
    <package>
	<name>poppler</name>
	<name>poppler-glib</name>
	<name>poppler-qt5</name>
	<name>poppler-qt6</name>
	<name>poppler-utils</name>
	<range><lt>26.04.0_1</lt></range>
    </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:24984 reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:24984">
	  <p>A flaw was found in Poppler's Splash backend.  A remote attacker
	could exploit this vulnerability by crafting a malicious PDF file
	that, when rendered, triggers an integer overflow in the
	`tilingPatternFill` function.  This overflow leads to an undersized
	heap memory allocation, allowing a subsequent out-of-bounds write.
	Successful exploitation could result in arbitrary code execution,
	information disclosure, or denial of service within the context of
	the application processing the PDF.</p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-10118</cvename>
      <url>https://cveawg.mitre.org/api/cve/CVE-2026-10118</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-06-01</discovery>
      <entry>2026-07-14</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="b478ff13-7f6e-11f1-b594-3c7c3fba4204">
    <topic>ocaml-opam -- opam install sandbox escape using symlinks</topic>
    <affects>
    <package>
	<name>ocaml-opam</name>
	<range><lt>2.5.2</lt></range>
    </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>The OCaml Team reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://github.com/ocaml/security-advisories/blob/main/advisories/2026/OSEC-2026-10.md">
	  <p>Installing files through .install files do not check symlinks resolution of the target path, and so can bypass sandboxing.</p>
	  <p>Credits:<br/>
	    Reporter: "Kate Deplaix"<br/>
	    Remediation Developer: "Nathan Rebours"<br/>
	    Remediation Reviewer: "Raja Boujbel"<br/>
	    Coordinator: "Hannes Mehnert"<br/>
	  </p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-57825</cvename>
      <url>https://github.com/ocaml/security-advisories/blob/main/advisories/2026/OSEC-2026-10.md</url>
      <url>https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-57825</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-07-12</discovery>
      <entry>2026-07-14</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="fa0c03dd-7c3a-11f1-8dc2-dca632daf43b">
    <topic>Apache HttpClient -- misinterpret malformed authority component</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
       <name>apache-commons-httpclient</name>
       <name>jakarta-commons-httpclient</name>
       <range><ge>3.1</ge></range>
      </package>
      <package>
       <name>httpclient</name>
       <range><lt>4.5.13</lt></range>
       <range><ge>5.0.0</ge><lt>5.0.3</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>Apache Software Foundation reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2020-13956">
	  <p>Apache HttpClient versions prior to version 4.5.13 and 5.0.3 can misinterpret malformed authority component in request URIs passed to the library as java.net.URI object and pick the wrong target host for request execution.</p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2020-13956</cvename>
      <url>https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2020-13956</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2020-02-12</discovery>
      <entry>2026-07-10</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="de3f0385-7c37-11f1-8dc2-dca632daf43b">
    <topic>httpclient -- Improper Certificate Validation</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
       <name>apache-commons-httpclient</name>
       <name>jakarta-commons-httpclient</name>
       <range><ge>3.1</ge></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>MITRE reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2012-5783">
	  <p>Apache Commons HttpClient 3.x, as used in ..., does not verify that the server hostname matches a domain name in the subject's Common Name (CN) or subjectAltName field of the X.509 certificate, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof SSL servers via an arbitrary valid certificate.</p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2012-5783</cvename>
      <url>https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2012-5783</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2012-04-11</discovery>
      <entry>2026-07-10</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="7a56b0f7-7b62-11f1-8a70-10ffe07f9334">
    <topic>mailpit -- multiple vulnerabilities</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
	<name>mailpit</name>
	<range><lt>1.30.4</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>Mailpit author reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://github.com/axllent/mailpit/releases/tag/v1.30.4">
	  <p>Mailpit's SMTP server reads each command line with an
	  unbounded bufio.Reader.ReadString('\n') before parsing
	  the command or enforcing any protocol length limit. A
	  remote SMTP client can send an oversized single command
	  line and force Mailpit to allocate attacker-controlled
	  memory before the server returns a syntax error or times
	  out, even though RFC 5321 limits SMTP command lines to
	  512 octets including CRLF.</p>
	  <p>Mailpit's thumbnail endpoint decodes attacker-supplied
	  image attachments into a full raster before checking any
	  decoded-pixel, dimension, or memory budget. A remote
	  client that can store an email and reach the default web
	  API can supply a compact high-dimension image, then request
	  <code>/api/v1/message/{id}/part/{partID}/thumb</code> to
	  force server-side memory and CPU work far larger than the
	  encoded attachment size before Mailpit returns a 180x120
	  thumbnail.</p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <url>https://github.com/axllent/mailpit/security/advisories/GHSA-w878-pj84-3j5v</url>
      <url>https://github.com/axllent/mailpit/security/advisories/GHSA-75mr-qw9x-3r39</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-07-09</discovery>
      <entry>2026-07-09</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="84ce0c0c-7b4e-11f1-9c40-2cf05da270f3">
    <topic>Gitlab -- Vulnerabilities</topic>
    <affects>
<package>
	<name>gitlab-ce</name>
	<name>gitlab-ee</name>
	<range><ge>19.1.0</ge><lt>19.1.2</lt></range>
	<range><ge>19.0.0</ge><lt>19.0.4</lt></range>
	<range><ge>9.1.0</ge><lt>18.11.7</lt></range>
</package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>Gitlab reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://docs.gitlab.com/releases/patches/patch-release-gitlab-19-1-2-released/">
	  <p>Cross-site Scripting issue in vulnerability evidence table renderer impacts GitLab EE</p>
	  <p>HTML Injection in wiki markup rendering impacts GitLab CE/EE</p>
	  <p>Insufficiently Protected Credentials issue in repository mirroring impacts GitLab EE</p>
	  <p>Improper Access Control issue in work items impacts GitLab EE</p>
	  <p>Missing Authorization issue in commit discussion display impacts GitLab CE/EE</p>
	  <p>Ambiguity Reference issue in a tag or branch impacts GitLab CE/EE</p>
	  <p>Incorrect Authorization issue in group-level settings impacts GitLab EE</p>
	  <p>Incorrect Authorization issue in compliance violation management impacts GitLab EE</p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-6896</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13320</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11827</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-8472</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-7492</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2025-12506</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13151</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-6352</cvename>
      <url>https://docs.gitlab.com/releases/patches/patch-release-gitlab-19-1-2-released/</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-07-08</discovery>
      <entry>2026-07-09</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="9a1fdf39-7b10-11f1-a315-589cfc10a551">
    <topic>libXfont2 -- Multiple vulnerabilities</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
	<name>libXfont2</name>
	<range><lt>2.0.8</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>X.Org project reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-announce/2026-July/003714.html">
	  <p>Multiple issues have been found in the libXfont2 library published
	     by X.Org for which we are releasing security fixes in libXfont2-2.0.8.</p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-56001</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-56002</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-56003</cvename>
      <url>https://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-announce/2026-July/003714.html</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-07-08</discovery>
      <entry>2026-07-08</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="7ac0f35a-7aeb-11f1-a315-589cfc10a551">
    <topic>xwayland -- Multiple vulnerabilities</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
	<name>xwayland</name>
	<range><lt>24.1.13,1</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>X.Org project reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-announce/2026-July/003716.html">
	  <p>Multiple issues have been found in the X server and Xwayland
	     implementations published by X.Org for which we are releasing
	     security fixes for in xorg-server-21.1.24 and xwayland-24.1.13.</p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-55999</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-56000</cvename>
      <url>https://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-announce/2026-July/003716.html</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-07-07</discovery>
      <entry>2026-07-08</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="d6354a08-7ad4-11f1-a315-589cfc10a551">
    <topic>xorg-server -- Multiple vulnerabilities</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
	<name>xorg-server</name>
	<range><lt>21.1.24,1</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>X.Org project reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-announce/2026-July/003716.html">
	  <p>Multiple issues have been found in the X server and Xwayland
	     implementations published by X.Org for which we are releasing
	     security fixes for in xorg-server-21.1.24 and xwayland-24.1.13.</p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-55999</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-56000</cvename>
      <url>https://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-announce/2026-July/003716.html</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-07-07</discovery>
      <entry>2026-07-08</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="9647af6d-7a05-11f1-99fc-40b034429ecf">
    <topic>cacti -- multiple vulnerabilities</topic>
    <affects>
<package>
<name>cacti</name>
<range><lt>1.2.31</lt></range>
</package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>Cacti project reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://github.com/Cacti/cacti/releases/tag/release%2F1.2.31">
	  <p>This release includes fixes for a number of vulnerabilities that were responsibly disclosed by external researchers</p>
	  <ul>
	  <li>CVE-2026-39894 RRDtool metric shift via LC_NUMERIC locale comma decimal formatting</li>
	  <li>CVE-2026-40082 Session Fixation via missing session_regenerate_id() after login</li>
	  <li>CVE-2026-40941 Package Import Signature Validation Bypass allows self-signed packages</li>
	  <li>CVE-2026-39897 Reflected XSS in html_auth_footer error message output</li>
	  <li>CVE-2026-39900 Reflected XSS via tab parameter in auth_profile.php JavaScript context</li>
	  <li>CVE-2026-46531 SQL Injection in automation_tree_rules.php</li>
	  <li>CVE-2026-44481 Pre-auth Open Redirect via link.php Referer header</li>
	  <li>CVE-2026-39952 Stored XSS in Report Tree expansion titles</li>
	  <li>CVE-2026-39893 Pre-authentication SQL injection via rfilter RLIKE clause in graph_view.php</li>
	  <li>CVE-2026-22802 Authentication Bypass leads to information disclosure</li>
	  <li>CVE-2026-40080 Open Redirect via HTTP_REFERER substring check in auth_login_redirect</li>
	  <li>CVE-2026-40078 Backend ORDER BY SQL Injection</li>
	  <li>CVE-2026-39949 Authenticated Remote Code Execution via Host Variable Injection</li>
	  <li>CVE-2026-40081 Reports IDOR allows any authenticated user to modify other users' reports (CWE-639)</li>
	  <li>CVE-2026-39948 SQL Injection via rfilter parameter in RLIKE clauses</li>
	  <li>CVE-2026-39902 Authenticated RCE on Data Input</li>
	  <li>CVE-2026-39898 Reflected XSS via rfilter parameter in aggregate_graphs.php input value</li>
	  <li>CVE-2026-41884 Arbitrary File Read via Reports format_file path traversal</li>
	  <li>CVE-2026-39955 Pre-Authentication SQL Injection via unanchored FILTER_VALIDATE_REGEXP in graph_view.php</li>
	  <li>CVE-2026-39896 TOCTOU race in auth_process_lockout allows brute-force lockout bypass</li>
	  <li>CVE-2026-39950 Arbitrary PHP file write via Plugin Archive extraction leading to RCE</li>
	  <li>CVE-2026-40083 SQL Injection in managers.php via uncast array values in IN clauses</li>
	  <li>CVE-2026-40084 Arbitrary File Read via path traversal in Report format_file parameter</li>
	  <li>CVE-2026-39951 Stored SQL Injection via graph_name_regexp in Reports feature</li>
	  <li>CVE-2026-39899 Path traversal via filename parameter in package_import.php</li>
	  <li>CVE-2026-39938 Unauthenticated LFI via graph_theme and rrdtool IPC serialization hardening</li>
	  <li>CVE-2026-39939 Path traversal in Package Import file write allows arbitrary file creation in webroot</li>
	  <li>CVE-2026-39947 RRDtool IPC pipe poisoning via is_numeric newline bypass in rrdtool_function_update</li>
	  <li>CVE-2026-39895 Second-order RCE via unescaped log path in exec_background shell redirection</li>
	  <li>CVE-2026-40079 Command Injection via escape_command() no-op in RRDtool execution</li>
	  <li>CVE-2026-40194, CVE-2026-32935 in phpseclib - This is breaking change for RRDProxy</li>
	  <li>CVE-2026-1513 billboard.js before 3.18.0 Improper Input Sanitization Allows Remote JavaScript Execution</li>
	  </ul>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-39894</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-40082</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-40941</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-39897</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-39900</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-46531</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-44481</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-39952</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-39893</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-22802</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-40080</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-40078</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-39949</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-40081</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-39948</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-39902</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-39898</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-41884</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-39955</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-39896</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-39950</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-40083</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-40084</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-39951</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-39899</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-39938</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-39939</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-39947</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-39895</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-40079</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-40194</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-32935</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-1513</cvename>
      <url>https://github.com/Cacti/cacti/releases/tag/release%2F1.2.31</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-06-16</discovery>
      <entry>2026-07-07</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="a3a34818-79a0-11f1-b295-98b78501ef2a">
    <topic>xrdp -- multiple vulnerabilities</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
	<name>xrdp</name>
	<range><lt>0.10.6.1.r.1,1</lt></range>
      </package>
      <package>
	<name>xrdp-devel</name>
	<range><lt>0.10.80.b20260706,1</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>xrdp projects reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://github.com/neutrinolabs/xrdp/releases/tag/v0.10.6.1">
	<p>xrdp v0.10.6.1 fixes 10 vulnerabilities and 1 regression introduced
	by a vulnerability fix in the previous release.</p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-41252</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-41521</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-44178</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-42218</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-44978</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-54538</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-55238</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-55626</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-55639</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-55645</cvename>
      <url>https://github.com/neutrinolabs/xrdp/releases/tag/v0.10.6.1</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-07-06</discovery>
      <entry>2026-07-06</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="d47e608f-2e2a-4366-ad17-ce2480bf912d">
    <topic>zeek -- potential DoS vulnerabilities</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
	<name>zeek</name>
	<range><lt>8.0.9</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>Tim Wojtulewicz of Corelight reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://github.com/zeek/zeek/releases/tag/v8.0.9">
	  <p> The NVT, Rlogin, and RSH analyzers have received fixes
	  to avoid unbounded state growth. Due to the fact that
	  these packets can be received from remote hosts, these
	  are considered DoS risks. </p>
	  <p> A specially crafted WebSocket payload can cause the
	  Spicy WebSocket analyzer to use excessive memory when
	  processing close, ping, and pong frames. Due to the fact
	  that these packets can be received from remote hosts,
	  these are considered a DoS risk. </p>
	  <p> A specially crafted series of Finger packets can cause
	  the Spicy Finger analyzer to use excessive amounts of
	  memory and potentially crash Zeek. Due to the fact that
	  these packets can be received from remote hosts, this is
	  considered a DoS risk. </p>
	  <p> A specially crafted Kerberos packet can cause the
	  Kerberos analyzer to enter an invalid state and potentially
	  crash Zeek.  Due to the fact that these packets can be
	  received from remote hosts, this is considered a DoS risk.
	  </p>
	  <p> A specially crafted series of RDP packets can cause
	  the RDP analyzer to use excessive amounts of memory and
	  potentially crash Zeek. Due to the fact that these packets
	  can be received from remote hosts, this is considered a
	  DoS risk. </p>
	  <p> A specially crafted IP packet can cause the IP analyzer
	  to read past the end of the contents of the packet when
	  emitting the packet_contents event and possibly crash.
	  Due to the fact that these packets can be received from
	  remote hosts, this is considered a DoS risk. </p>
	  <p> A specially crafted IP packet can cause the packet
	  discarding code to read off the end of the packet when
	  looking for follow-on header data. This may potentially
	  lead to a crash of Zeek. Due to the fact that these packets
	  can be received from remote hosts, this is considered a
	  DoS risk. </p>
	  <p> A specially crafted series of Gnutella packets may
	  cause Zeek to continue accumulating memory and eventually
	  crash. Due to the fact that these packets can be received
	  from remote hosts, this is considered a DoS risk. </p>
	  <p> A specially crafted ICMPv6 packet can cause the ICMP
	  analyzer to skip part of the packet and not report
	  corresponding events and logs. Due to the fact that these
	  packets can be received from remote hosts, this is
	  considered an evasion risk. </p>
	  <p> A specially crafted SSH packet can cause the SSH
	  analyzer to throw BinPAC exceptions for extremely large
	  packets and skip logging them otherwise. Due to the fact
	  that these packets can be received from remote hosts,
	  this is considered an evasion risk. </p>
	  <p> A number of issues with the HTTP analyzer were found
	  involving unusual Content-Length, Transfer-Encoding and
	  Expect header usage. Due to the fact that these packets
	  can be received from remote hosts, this is considered an
	  evasion risk. </p>
	  <p> A series of fixes were applied to the serialization
	  code in Zeek to avoid buffer overreads with both Broker
	  and ZeroMQ traffic.  On debug builds, these hit various
	  abort() conditions and cause Zeek to exit. Due to the
	  fact that all of these states require direct access to
	  the Broker/ZeroMQ ports (meaning access to the local
	  network to some degree), this isn’t considered a DoS risk.
	  </p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <url>https://github.com/zeek/zeek/releases/tag/v8.0.9</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-07-06</discovery>
      <entry>2026-07-06</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="c7be43b0-78f0-11f1-8898-1c697a616631">
    <topic>Emacs -- Heap out-of-bounds write when rendering SVG images</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
	<name>emacs</name>
	<name>emacs-canna</name>
	<name>emacs-nox</name>
	<name>emacs-wayland</name>
	<range><ge>28.1,3</ge><lt>30.2_4,3</lt></range>
      </package>
      <package>
	<name>emacs-devel</name>
	<name>emacs-devel-nox</name>
	<range><lt>31.0.50.20250201,3</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	  <h1>Problem Description</h1>
	  <p>When GNU Emacs renders an SVG image whose image spec includes a
	  :css property, an off-by-one error in svg_load_image() writes a NUL
	  byte one position past the end of a heap allocation.  The copied
	  string is also left without NUL termination within its allocation,
	  causing a subsequent out-of-bounds read.</p>
	  <h1>Impact</h1>
	  <p>A single NUL byte heap overflow is a well-understood exploitation
	  primitive ("poison NUL byte") that can corrupt heap metadata and
	  potentially be escalated to arbitrary code execution.  The overflow
	  can be triggered by Lisp code that displays an SVG image with a
	  crafted :css property.</p>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-6861</cvename>
      <url>https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=80851</url>
      <url>https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-6861</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-04-17</discovery>
      <entry>2026-07-06</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="d7939352-788b-11f1-b72c-8447094a420f">
    <topic>Weechat -- Memory leak in relay-API</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
	<name>weechat</name>
	<range><lt>4.9.3</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>The Weechat project reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://github.com/weechat/weechat/security/advisories/GHSA-wmpc-m6g9-fwj8">
	  <p>Pre-auth memory leak in relay-api POST /api/handshake (unfreed JSON body) → unauthenticated remote memory-exhaustion DoS.</p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <url>https://github.com/weechat/weechat/security/advisories/GHSA-wmpc-m6g9-fwj8</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-07-05</discovery>
      <entry>2026-07-05</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="d5578ba4-7889-11f1-b72c-8447094a420f">
    <topic>Roundcube -- Multiple vulnerabilities</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
	<name>roundcube-php82</name>
	<name>roundcube-php83</name>
	<name>roundcube-php84</name>
	<name>roundcube-php85</name>
	<range><lt>1.7.2,1</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>The Rouncube project reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://github.com/roundcube/roundcubemail/releases/tag/1.7.2">
	  <p>See links for more detail</p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-54432</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-54433</cvename>
      <url>https://github.com/roundcube/roundcubemail/releases/tag/1.7.2</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-07-05</discovery>
      <entry>2026-07-05</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="803b9816-77af-11f1-ba71-5404a68ad561">
    <topic>traefik -- Multiple vulnerabilities</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
      <name>traefik</name>
      <range><lt>3.7.6</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
      <p>The traefik project releases a new version addressing multiple CVEs:</p>
      <blockquote cite="https://github.com/traefik/traefik/releases/tag/v3.7.6">
      <ul>
      <li>CVE-2026-54763 (underscore-variant identity spoofing)</li>
      <li>CVE-2026-54764 (ForwardAuth middleware leaks X-Forwarded-Port spoofing)</li>
      <li>CVE-2026-54765 (Gateway HTTPRoute backendRef filters can leak backend context)</li>
      </ul>
      </blockquote>
      </body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-54763</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-54764</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-54765</cvename>
      <url>https://github.com/traefik/traefik/releases/tag/v3.7.6</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-06-30</discovery>
      <entry>2026-07-04</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="dfa2ef44-7785-11f1-99fc-40b034429ecf">
    <topic>p5-CGI-Session -- secuity fixes</topic>
    <affects>
<package>
<name>p5-CGI-Session</name>
<range><lt>4.49</lt></range>
</package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>CGI-Session project reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://metacpan.org/dist/CGI-Session/changes">
	  <p>SECURITY: Strengthen cryptographic randomness of MD5 driver.</p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-56016</cvename>
      <url>https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-56016</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-06-30</discovery>
      <entry>2026-07-04</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="659e52d0-7574-11f1-8de5-a8a1599412c6">
    <topic>chromium -- security fixes</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
       <name>chromium</name>
       <range><lt>150.0.7871.46</lt></range>
      </package>
      <package>
       <name>ungoogled-chromium</name>
       <range><lt>150.0.7871.46</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
       <p>Chrome Releases reports:</p>
       <blockquote cite="https://chromereleases.googleblog.com/2026/06/stable-channel-update-for-desktop_0175352312.html">
	 <p>This update includes 382 security fixes:</p>
	 <ul>
	    <li>[506558270] Critical CVE-2026-13774: Use after free in Extensions.</li>
	    <li>[511766407] Critical CVE-2026-13775: Use after free in GPU.</li>
	    <li>[513012139] Critical CVE-2026-13776: Type Confusion in Dawn.</li>
	    <li>[513128566] Critical CVE-2026-13777: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in iOSWeb.</li>
	    <li>[513167952] Critical CVE-2026-13778: Use after free in WebUSB.</li>
	    <li>[513222854] Critical CVE-2026-13779: Use after free in Chromoting.</li>
	    <li>[514769383] Critical CVE-2026-13780: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in ANGLE.</li>
	    <li>[516457532] Critical CVE-2026-13781: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Skia.</li>
	    <li>[516683433] Critical CVE-2026-13782: Use after free in Browser.</li>
	    <li>[516962178] Critical CVE-2026-13783: Use after free in Views.</li>
	    <li>[516962715] Critical CVE-2026-13784: Use after free in Views.</li>
	    <li>[517021684] Critical CVE-2026-13785: Use after free in Bluetooth.</li>
	    <li>[518007821] Critical CVE-2026-13786: Use after free in Ozone.</li>
	    <li>[522919313] Critical CVE-2026-13787: Use after free in Chromoting.</li>
	    <li>[523119897] Critical CVE-2026-13788: Use after free in Fullscreen.</li>
	    <li>[493847920] High CVE-2026-13789: Use after free in GPU.</li>
	    <li>[457771782] High CVE-2026-13790: Side-channel information leakage in Scroll.</li>
	    <li>[503850012] High CVE-2026-13791: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Downloads.</li>
	    <li>[496012368] High CVE-2026-13792: Use after free in Touchbar.</li>
	    <li>[510829679] High CVE-2026-13793: Insufficient policy enforcement in SVG.</li>
	    <li>[513893425] High CVE-2026-13794: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in WebAppInstalls.</li>
	    <li>[476591032] High CVE-2026-13795: Insufficient policy enforcement in Chrome for iOS.</li>
	    <li>[491894115] High CVE-2026-13796: Integer overflow in Chromecast.</li>
	    <li>[499025645] High CVE-2026-13797: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Chromecast.</li>
	    <li>[499048914] High CVE-2026-13798: Heap buffer overflow in Chromecast.</li>
	    <li>[499252371] High CVE-2026-13799: Use after free in QUIC.</li>
	    <li>[500108770] High CVE-2026-13800: Inappropriate implementation in Updater.</li>
	    <li>[500587568] High CVE-2026-13801: Integer overflow in Chromecast.</li>
	    <li>[501623322] High CVE-2026-13802: Use after free in Views.</li>
	    <li>[501669642] High CVE-2026-13803: Type Confusion in Chrome Tabs.</li>
	    <li>[501873032] High CVE-2026-13804: Use after free in Chromecast.</li>
	    <li>[502282040] High CVE-2026-13805: Use after free in GFX.</li>
	    <li>[503333798] High CVE-2026-13806: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Accessibility.</li>
	    <li>[504194494] High CVE-2026-13807: Use after free in Import.</li>
	    <li>[504221510] High CVE-2026-13808: Insufficient data validation in Chrome for iOS.</li>
	    <li>[504222227] High CVE-2026-13809: Side-channel information leakage in Safe Browsing. eported by Google on 2026-04-19</li>
	    <li>[504600482] High CVE-2026-13810: Inappropriate implementation in Input.</li>
	    <li>[506149253] High CVE-2026-13811: Use after free in IME.</li>
	    <li>[508293203] High CVE-2026-13812: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Chrome for iOS.</li>
	    <li>[508462149] High CVE-2026-13813: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Chrome for iOS.</li>
	    <li>[511712766] High CVE-2026-13814: Use after free in Views.</li>
	    <li>[511722207] High CVE-2026-13815: Use after free in Blink.</li>
	    <li>[511735715] High CVE-2026-13816: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in File Input.</li>
	    <li>[511739631] High CVE-2026-13817: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Glic.</li>
	    <li>[511823182] High CVE-2026-13818: Inappropriate implementation in Passwords.</li>
	    <li>[512962749] High CVE-2026-13819: Out of bounds read in ANGLE.</li>
	    <li>[512986879] High CVE-2026-13820: Out of bounds read in Skia.</li>
	    <li>[513142445] High CVE-2026-13821: Use after free in Canvas.</li>
	    <li>[513148038] High CVE-2026-13822: Inappropriate implementation in Extensions.</li>
	    <li>[513163011] High CVE-2026-13823: Use after free in Glic.</li>
	    <li>[513177497] High CVE-2026-13824: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Extensions.</li>
	    <li>[513209610] High CVE-2026-13825: Uninitialized Use in Dawn.</li>
	    <li>[513237800] High CVE-2026-13826: Inappropriate implementation in Autofill.</li>
	    <li>[513371963] High CVE-2026-13827: Use after free in Updater.</li>
	    <li>[513399832] High CVE-2026-13828: Inappropriate implementation in Enterprise.</li>
	    <li>[513490996] High CVE-2026-13829: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Settings.</li>
	    <li>[513727494] High CVE-2026-13830: Use after free in Chromoting.</li>
	    <li>[513781328] High CVE-2026-13831: Use after free in GPU.</li>
	    <li>[513822378] High CVE-2026-13832: Use after free in Headless.</li>
	    <li>[513920082] High CVE-2026-13833: Uninitialized Use in ANGLE.</li>
	    <li>[513925114] High CVE-2026-13834: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in ANGLE.</li>
	    <li>[514338102] High CVE-2026-13835: Inappropriate implementation in XML.</li>
	    <li>[514420555] High CVE-2026-13836: Inappropriate implementation in CSS.</li>
	    <li>[514429130] High CVE-2026-13837: Inappropriate implementation in CSS.</li>
	    <li>[514445398] High CVE-2026-13838: Inappropriate implementation in CSS.</li>
	    <li>[514449396] High CVE-2026-13839: Inappropriate implementation in CSS.</li>
	    <li>[514609778] High CVE-2026-13840: Insufficient policy enforcement in Canvas.</li>
	    <li>[515467789] High CVE-2026-13841: Integer overflow in Skia.</li>
	    <li>[516836297] High CVE-2026-13842: Incorrect security UI in Chrome for iOS.</li>
	    <li>[516869032] High CVE-2026-13843: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Chrome for iOS.</li>
	    <li>[516926115] High CVE-2026-13844: Use after free in Updater.</li>
	    <li>[516936863] High CVE-2026-13845: Use after free in DOM.</li>
	    <li>[516999424] High CVE-2026-13846: Use after free in USB.</li>
	    <li>[517073397] High CVE-2026-13847: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Chrome for iOS.</li>
	    <li>[517345069] High CVE-2026-13848: Use after free in Forms.</li>
	    <li>[517351411] High CVE-2026-13849: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Chromoting.</li>
	    <li>[517610676] High CVE-2026-13850: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Chrome for iOS.</li>
	    <li>[519692255] High CVE-2026-13851: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in WebAppInstalls.</li>
	    <li>[522560124] High CVE-2026-13852: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in WebAppInstalls.</li>
	    <li>[523224019] High CVE-2026-13853: Use after free in Journeys.</li>
	    <li>[523690961] High CVE-2026-13854: Use after free in Ozone.</li>
	    <li>[524395469] High CVE-2026-13855: Use after free in Ozone.</li>
	    <li>[508092634] Medium CVE-2026-13856: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Speech.</li>
	    <li>[479203484] Medium CVE-2026-13857: Inappropriate implementation in Geometry.</li>
	    <li>[507090179] Medium CVE-2026-13858: Out of bounds read in FFmpeg.</li>
	    <li>[484756087] Medium CVE-2026-13859: Inappropriate implementation in ANGLE.</li>
	    <li>[417052041] Medium CVE-2026-13860: Incorrect security UI in Autofill.</li>
	    <li>[495456765] Medium CVE-2026-13861: Use after free in Core.</li>
	    <li>[495897416] Medium CVE-2026-13862: Insufficient policy enforcement in Web Authentication (Passkeys &amp; Security Keys).</li>
	    <li>[496012495] Medium CVE-2026-13863: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in CustomTabs.</li>
	    <li>[496399913] Medium CVE-2026-13864: Insufficient policy enforcement in WebHID.</li>
	    <li>[497090912] Medium CVE-2026-13865: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Enterprise.</li>
	    <li>[497207698] Medium CVE-2026-13866: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Input.</li>
	    <li>[497345177] Medium CVE-2026-13867: Inappropriate implementation in Geolocation.</li>
	    <li>[497453475] Medium CVE-2026-13868: Inappropriate implementation in Network.</li>
	    <li>[497610642] Medium CVE-2026-13869: Use after free in Device.</li>
	    <li>[497634837] Medium CVE-2026-13870: Use after free in WebView.</li>
	    <li>[497961376] Medium CVE-2026-13871: Insufficient data validation in GuestView.</li>
	    <li>[497977983] Medium CVE-2026-13872: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in WebAppInstalls.</li>
	    <li>[498085466] Medium CVE-2026-13873: Out of bounds memory access in Layout.</li>
	    <li>[498411773] Medium CVE-2026-13874: Inappropriate implementation in DataTransfer.</li>
	    <li>[498721671] Medium CVE-2026-13875: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in GPU.</li>
	    <li>[498722200] Medium CVE-2026-13876: Inappropriate implementation in Network.</li>
	    <li>[498820206] Medium CVE-2026-13877: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in ANGLE.</li>
	    <li>[499007266] Medium CVE-2026-13878: Use after free in Bluetooth.</li>
	    <li>[499022239] Medium CVE-2026-13879: Use after free in Bluetooth.</li>
	    <li>[499025880] Medium CVE-2026-13880: Use after free in USB.</li>
	    <li>[499100491] Medium CVE-2026-13881: Insufficient data validation in WebAppInstalls.</li>
	    <li>[499162550] Medium CVE-2026-13882: Inappropriate implementation in USB.</li>
	    <li>[500030250] Medium CVE-2026-13883: Type Confusion in ANGLE.</li>
	    <li>[500077014] Medium CVE-2026-13884: Heap buffer overflow in Chromecast.</li>
	    <li>[500474409] Medium CVE-2026-13885: Use after free in Skia.</li>
	    <li>[500475136] Medium CVE-2026-13886: Policy bypass in Isolated Web Apps.</li>
	    <li>[500508524] Medium CVE-2026-13887: Insufficient policy enforcement in NFC.</li>
	    <li>[500566906] Medium CVE-2026-13888: Use after free in Extensions.</li>
	    <li>[500588580] Medium CVE-2026-13889: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in WebAuthentication.</li>
	    <li>[500601345] Medium CVE-2026-13890: Out of bounds read in Chromecast.</li>
	    <li>[501631475] Medium CVE-2026-13891: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Extensions.</li>
	    <li>[501674841] Medium CVE-2026-13892: Inappropriate implementation in Chrome for iOS.</li>
	    <li>[501729582] Medium CVE-2026-13893: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in WebUI.</li>
	    <li>[501741117] Medium CVE-2026-13894: Insufficient policy enforcement in Network.</li>
	    <li>[501770542] Medium CVE-2026-13895: Inappropriate implementation in Autofill.</li>
	    <li>[501820076] Medium CVE-2026-13896: Insufficient policy enforcement in Glic.</li>
	    <li>[501877896] Medium CVE-2026-13897: Insufficient policy enforcement in Chromecast.</li>
	    <li>[501925480] Medium CVE-2026-13898: Use after free in Cast Receiver.</li>
	    <li>[502109002] Medium CVE-2026-13899: Use after free in HTML.</li>
	    <li>[502374993] Medium CVE-2026-13900: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Chromecast.</li>
	    <li>[503585173] Medium CVE-2026-13901: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Serial.</li>
	    <li>[503725717] Medium CVE-2026-13902: Inappropriate implementation in Chrome for iOS.</li>
	    <li>[503912196] Medium CVE-2026-13903: Insufficient policy enforcement in Bluetooth.</li>
	    <li>[504185807] Medium CVE-2026-13904: Incorrect security UI in Safe Browsing.</li>
	    <li>[504192688] Medium CVE-2026-13905: Incorrect security UI in Chrome for iOS.</li>
	    <li>[504613867] Medium CVE-2026-13906: Out of bounds read in Codecs.</li>
	    <li>[505156685] Medium CVE-2026-13907: Inappropriate implementation in iOSWeb.</li>
	    <li>[505242189] Medium CVE-2026-13908: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Omnibox.</li>
	    <li>[505933538] Medium CVE-2026-13909: Insufficient policy enforcement in DevTools.</li>
	    <li>[507231605] Medium CVE-2026-13910: Insufficient policy enforcement in WebXR.</li>
	    <li>[507239830] Medium CVE-2026-13911: Insufficient data validation in Spellcheck.</li>
	    <li>[508259433] Medium CVE-2026-13912: Incorrect security UI in Safe Browsing.</li>
	    <li>[508260619] Medium CVE-2026-13913: Insufficient policy enforcement in Autofill.</li>
	    <li>[508273690] Medium CVE-2026-13914: Inappropriate implementation in Passwords.</li>
	    <li>[508275293] Medium CVE-2026-13915: Use after free in Chrome for iOS.</li>
	    <li>[508283108] Medium CVE-2026-13916: Inappropriate implementation in Chrome for iOS.</li>
	    <li>[508286935] Medium CVE-2026-13917: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Chrome for iOS.</li>
	    <li>[509712284] Medium CVE-2026-13918: Use after free in Chrome for iOS.</li>
	    <li>[511249430] Medium CVE-2026-13919: Insufficient data validation in Extensions.</li>
	    <li>[511722559] Medium CVE-2026-13920: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Media.</li>
	    <li>[511738175] Medium CVE-2026-13921: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in DeviceBoundSessionCredentials.</li>
	    <li>[511748106] Medium CVE-2026-13922: Side-channel information leakage in Paint.</li>
	    <li>[511772034] Medium CVE-2026-13923: Uninitialized Use in GPU.</li>
	    <li>[511784747] Medium CVE-2026-13924: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in WebView.</li>
	    <li>[511802911] Medium CVE-2026-13925: Inappropriate implementation in Downloads.</li>
	    <li>[511814550] Medium CVE-2026-13926: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Network.</li>
	    <li>[511826446] Medium CVE-2026-13927: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in UI.</li>
	    <li>[512162479] Medium CVE-2026-13928: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Enterprise.</li>
	    <li>[512249559] Medium CVE-2026-13929: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in DevTools.</li>
	    <li>[512937764] Medium CVE-2026-13930: Insufficient policy enforcement in Actor.</li>
	    <li>[512997441] Medium CVE-2026-13931: Inappropriate implementation in Media.</li>
	    <li>[513001690] Medium CVE-2026-13932: Inappropriate implementation in Sharing.</li>
	    <li>[513002625] Medium CVE-2026-13933: Insufficient policy enforcement in Passwords.</li>
	    <li>[513006636] Medium CVE-2026-13934: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Dawn.</li>
	    <li>[513009005] Medium CVE-2026-13935: Side-channel information leakage in ComputePressure.</li>
	    <li>[513044658] Medium CVE-2026-13936: Inappropriate implementation in Passwords.</li>
	    <li>[513046494] Medium CVE-2026-13937: Insufficient policy enforcement in Passwords.</li>
	    <li>[513143921] Medium CVE-2026-13938: Integer overflow in Fonts.</li>
	    <li>[513149760] Medium CVE-2026-13939: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in WebShare.</li>
	    <li>[513158425] Medium CVE-2026-13940: Uninitialized Use in Cast.</li>
	    <li>[513183855] Medium CVE-2026-13941: Inappropriate implementation in SiteSettings.</li>
	    <li>[513186670] Medium CVE-2026-13942: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Video Capture.</li>
	    <li>[513204116] Medium CVE-2026-13943: Uninitialized Use in CSS.</li>
	    <li>[513224212] Medium CVE-2026-13944: Inappropriate implementation in DataTransfer.</li>
	    <li>[513226551] Medium CVE-2026-13945: Insufficient policy enforcement in Extensions.</li>
	    <li>[513274039] Medium CVE-2026-13946: Inappropriate implementation in ScriptInjections.</li>
	    <li>[513280648] Medium CVE-2026-13947: Uninitialized Use in XR.</li>
	    <li>[513286820] Medium CVE-2026-13948: Insufficient policy enforcement in Extensions.</li>
	    <li>[513311569] Medium CVE-2026-13949: Insufficient policy enforcement in Payments.</li>
	    <li>[513360781] Medium CVE-2026-13950: Uninitialized Use in GPU.</li>
	    <li>[513394321] Medium CVE-2026-13951: Policy bypass in USB.</li>
	    <li>[513401808] Medium CVE-2026-13952: Inappropriate implementation in PerformanceAPIs.</li>
	    <li>[513459192] Medium CVE-2026-13953: Inappropriate implementation in SplitView.</li>
	    <li>[513504934] Medium CVE-2026-13954: Insufficient policy enforcement in XML.</li>
	    <li>[513508305] Medium CVE-2026-13955: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in CustomTabs.</li>
	    <li>[513515168] Medium CVE-2026-13956: Incorrect security UI in PageInfo.</li>
	    <li>[513553557] Medium CVE-2026-13957: Incorrect security UI in Extensions.</li>
	    <li>[513567306] Medium CVE-2026-13958: Uninitialized Use in Codecs.</li>
	    <li>[513609249] Medium CVE-2026-13959: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Blink.</li>
	    <li>[513714023] Medium CVE-2026-13960: Inappropriate implementation in Passwords.</li>
	    <li>[513719481] Medium CVE-2026-13961: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in DevTools.</li>
	    <li>[513721370] Medium CVE-2026-13962: Insufficient data validation in PDF.</li>
	    <li>[513727626] Medium CVE-2026-13963: Inappropriate implementation in DevTools.</li>
	    <li>[513735096] Medium CVE-2026-13964: Insufficient policy enforcement in WebView.</li>
	    <li>[513737952] Medium CVE-2026-13965: Use after free in Oilpan.</li>
	    <li>[513741393] Medium CVE-2026-13966: Inappropriate implementation in History.</li>
	    <li>[513751951] Medium CVE-2026-13967: Type Confusion in V8.</li>
	    <li>[513762145] Medium CVE-2026-13968: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in DevTools.</li>
	    <li>[513762962] Medium CVE-2026-13969: Uninitialized Use in UI.</li>
	    <li>[513779283] Medium CVE-2026-13970: Uninitialized Use in Media.</li>
	    <li>[513780208] Medium CVE-2026-13971: Uninitialized Use in Skia.</li>
	    <li>[513792140] Medium CVE-2026-13972: Inappropriate implementation in Paint.</li>
	    <li>[513832989] Medium CVE-2026-13973: Inappropriate implementation in UI.</li>
	    <li>[513850475] Medium CVE-2026-13974: Integer overflow in Safe Browsing.</li>
	    <li>[513857658] Medium CVE-2026-13975: Out of bounds read in ANGLE.</li>
	    <li>[513858286] Medium CVE-2026-13976: Heap buffer overflow in Storage.</li>
	    <li>[513859894] Medium CVE-2026-13977: Inappropriate implementation in HTMLParser.</li>
	    <li>[513866949] Medium CVE-2026-13978: Insufficient policy enforcement in PageInfo.</li>
	    <li>[513988889] Medium CVE-2026-13979: Inappropriate implementation in Paint.</li>
	    <li>[513989973] Medium CVE-2026-13980: Incorrect security UI in Chrome for iOS.</li>
	    <li>[513990408] Medium CVE-2026-13981: Inappropriate implementation in Chrome for iOS.</li>
	    <li>[514006829] Medium CVE-2026-13982: Incorrect security UI in Passwords.</li>
	    <li>[514009910] Medium CVE-2026-13983: Incorrect security UI in Chrome for iOS.</li>
	    <li>[514010404] Medium CVE-2026-13984: Incorrect security UI in TabStrip.</li>
	    <li>[514013849] Medium CVE-2026-13985: Inappropriate implementation in MediaCapture.</li>
	    <li>[514020959] Medium CVE-2026-13986: Inappropriate implementation in Media UI.</li>
	    <li>[514039122] Medium CVE-2026-13987: Incorrect security UI in Mobile.</li>
	    <li>[514040614] Medium CVE-2026-13988: Inappropriate implementation in Paint.</li>
	    <li>[514056221] Medium CVE-2026-13989: Insufficient policy enforcement in PageInfo.</li>
	    <li>[514058439] Medium CVE-2026-13990: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in DataTransfer.</li>
	    <li>[514061117] Medium CVE-2026-13991: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Chrome for iOS.</li>
	    <li>[514063409] Medium CVE-2026-13992: Inappropriate implementation in UI.</li>
	    <li>[514064139] Medium CVE-2026-13993: Incorrect security UI in WebAppInstalls.</li>
	    <li>[514067416] Medium CVE-2026-13994: Inappropriate implementation in Credential Management.</li>
	    <li>[514067524] Medium CVE-2026-13995: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Autofill.</li>
	    <li>[514068972] Medium CVE-2026-13996: Incorrect security UI in Permissions.</li>
	    <li>[514069689] Medium CVE-2026-13997: Incorrect security UI in Extensions.</li>
	    <li>[514070501] Medium CVE-2026-13998: Incorrect security UI in File Input.</li>
	    <li>[514071697] Medium CVE-2026-13999: Inappropriate implementation in Extensions.</li>
	    <li>[514461552] Medium CVE-2026-14000: Inappropriate implementation in XML.</li>
	    <li>[514481943] Medium CVE-2026-14001: Inappropriate implementation in Network.</li>
	    <li>[514489361] Medium CVE-2026-14002: Inappropriate implementation in Geolocation.</li>
	    <li>[514503077] Medium CVE-2026-14003: Insufficient policy enforcement in Extensions.</li>
	    <li>[514538751] Medium CVE-2026-14004: Inappropriate implementation in CSS.</li>
	    <li>[514740273] Medium CVE-2026-14005: Use after free in Omnibox.</li>
	    <li>[515423596] Medium CVE-2026-14006: Use after free in Navigation.</li>
	    <li>[516425999] Medium CVE-2026-14007: Insufficient policy enforcement in PermissionsPolicy.</li>
	    <li>[516781007] Medium CVE-2026-14008: Uninitialized Use in WebXR.</li>
	    <li>[516819850] Medium CVE-2026-14009: Insufficient data validation in Passwords.</li>
	    <li>[516924151] Medium CVE-2026-14010: Uninitialized Use in Codecs.</li>
	    <li>[516944556] Medium CVE-2026-14011: Out of bounds read in SurfaceCapture.</li>
	    <li>[517110749] Medium CVE-2026-14012: Side-channel information leakage in CSS.</li>
	    <li>[517114175] Medium CVE-2026-14013: Inappropriate implementation in SVG.</li>
	    <li>[517155893] Medium CVE-2026-14014: Inappropriate implementation in Paint.</li>
	    <li>[517207235] Medium CVE-2026-14015: Inappropriate implementation in WebRTC.</li>
	    <li>[517234388] Medium CVE-2026-14016: Insufficient policy enforcement in SVG.</li>
	    <li>[517241992] Medium CVE-2026-14017: Inappropriate implementation in Navigation.</li>
	    <li>[517350251] Medium CVE-2026-14018: Use after free in Updater.</li>
	    <li>[517455455] Medium CVE-2026-14019: Inappropriate implementation in Passwords.</li>
	    <li>[517598518] Medium CVE-2026-14020: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in WebXR.</li>
	    <li>[517731924] Medium CVE-2026-14021: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in StorageAccessAPI.</li>
	    <li>[517791835] Medium CVE-2026-14022: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Network.</li>
	    <li>[518063436] Medium CVE-2026-14023: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in SanitizerAPI.</li>
	    <li>[518245882] Medium CVE-2026-14024: Use after free in Ozone.</li>
	    <li>[506482786] Low CVE-2026-14025: Use after free in Views.</li>
	    <li>[507263861] Low CVE-2026-14026: Incorrect security UI in SplitView.</li>
	    <li>[361375787] Low CVE-2026-14027: Use after free in SignIn.</li>
	    <li>[401816601] Low CVE-2026-14028: Incorrect security UI in Chrome for iOS.</li>
	    <li>[488762971] Low CVE-2026-14030: Incorrect security UI in SplitView.</li>
	    <li>[495459838] Low CVE-2026-14031: Incorrect security UI in File Input.</li>
	    <li>[495783474] Low CVE-2026-14032: Use after free in Bluetooth.</li>
	    <li>[495848160] Low CVE-2026-14033: Insufficient policy enforcement in Media.</li>
	    <li>[496368832] Low CVE-2026-14034: Inappropriate implementation in WebXR.</li>
	    <li>[496371586] Low CVE-2026-14035: Insufficient policy enforcement in Bluetooth.</li>
	    <li>[496411061] Low CVE-2026-14036: Insufficient policy enforcement in Bluetooth.</li>
	    <li>[496522611] Low CVE-2026-14037: Insufficient policy enforcement in GPU.</li>
	    <li>[497241148] Low CVE-2026-14038: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in New Tab Page.</li>
	    <li>[497358012] Low CVE-2026-14039: Insufficient policy enforcement in GetUserMedia.</li>
	    <li>[497488593] Low CVE-2026-14040: Use after free in BrowserTag.</li>
	    <li>[497544822] Low CVE-2026-14041: Insufficient policy enforcement in Serial.</li>
	    <li>[497558336] Low CVE-2026-14042: Inappropriate implementation in Isolated Web Apps.</li>
	    <li>[497632232] Low CVE-2026-14043: Use after free in GetUserMedia.</li>
	    <li>[497670996] Low CVE-2026-14044: Use after free in ANGLE.</li>
	    <li>[497723649] Low CVE-2026-14045: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Network.</li>
	    <li>[497959724] Low CVE-2026-14046: Inappropriate implementation in CustomTabs.</li>
	    <li>[498864176] Low CVE-2026-14047: Insufficient policy enforcement in Extensions.</li>
	    <li>[499189601] Low CVE-2026-14048: Use after free in Chromecast.</li>
	    <li>[501659888] Low CVE-2026-14049: Inappropriate implementation in GPU.</li>
	    <li>[501708647] Low CVE-2026-14050: Insufficient policy enforcement in Passwords.</li>
	    <li>[501747804] Low CVE-2026-14051: Uninitialized Use in GamepadAPI.</li>
	    <li>[501810874] Low CVE-2026-14052: Insufficient policy enforcement in FileSystem.</li>
	    <li>[501836539] Low CVE-2026-14053: Insufficient policy enforcement in Extensions.</li>
	    <li>[501851312] Low CVE-2026-14054: Insufficient policy enforcement in Network.</li>
	    <li>[501857663] Low CVE-2026-14055: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Device Trust.</li>
	    <li>[501888426] Low CVE-2026-14056: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Media.</li>
	    <li>[502212647] Low CVE-2026-14057: Insufficient policy enforcement in FedCM.</li>
	    <li>[502354038] Low CVE-2026-14058: Policy bypass in Parser.</li>
	    <li>[502363986] Low CVE-2026-14059: Insufficient policy enforcement in Related-Website-Sets.</li>
	    <li>[502372527] Low CVE-2026-14060: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Chromoting.</li>
	    <li>[502434484] Low CVE-2026-14061: Inappropriate implementation in Dawn.</li>
	    <li>[502448128] Low CVE-2026-14062: Inappropriate implementation in Views.</li>
	    <li>[502473563] Low CVE-2026-14063: Out of bounds memory access in Chromecast.</li>
	    <li>[502714977] Low CVE-2026-14064: Use after free in PageInfo.</li>
	    <li>[503617508] Low CVE-2026-14065: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in PageInfo.</li>
	    <li>[503779807] Low CVE-2026-14066: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Chrome for iOS.</li>
	    <li>[504069465] Low CVE-2026-14067: Use after free in Chrome for iOS.</li>
	    <li>[504210171] Low CVE-2026-14068: Inappropriate implementation in Omnibox.</li>
	    <li>[505136542] Low CVE-2026-14069: Integer overflow in WebNN.</li>
	    <li>[505137978] Low CVE-2026-14070: Uninitialized Use in WebNN.</li>
	    <li>[506143724] Low CVE-2026-14071: Side-channel information leakage in WebAudio.</li>
	    <li>[507099867] Low CVE-2026-14072: Incorrect security UI in SplitView.</li>
	    <li>[507237563] Low CVE-2026-14073: Insufficient policy enforcement in WebXR.</li>
	    <li>[511743480] Low CVE-2026-14074: Side-channel information leakage in WebAuthentication.</li>
	    <li>[511808800] Low CVE-2026-14075: Policy bypass in Chrome for iOS.</li>
	    <li>[511815165] Low CVE-2026-14076: Policy bypass in Network.</li>
	    <li>[511869411] Low CVE-2026-14077: Incorrect security UI in Select.</li>
	    <li>[512953564] Low CVE-2026-14078: Policy bypass in WebRTC.</li>
	    <li>[512971938] Low CVE-2026-14079: Policy bypass in Network.</li>
	    <li>[512997517] Low CVE-2026-14080: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in TabSwitcher.</li>
	    <li>[513030698] Low CVE-2026-14081: Insufficient policy enforcement in DevTools.</li>
	    <li>[513049578] Low CVE-2026-14082: Race in Storage.</li>
	    <li>[513128322] Low CVE-2026-14083: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in HTML.</li>
	    <li>[513138148] Low CVE-2026-14084: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Chromoting.</li>
	    <li>[513155863] Low CVE-2026-14085: Side-channel information leakage in CSS.</li>
	    <li>[513169718] Low CVE-2026-14086: Insufficient policy enforcement in HID.</li>
	    <li>[513177237] Low CVE-2026-14087: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in WebNN.</li>
	    <li>[513178869] Low CVE-2026-14088: Uninitialized Use in Canvas.</li>
	    <li>[513188254] Low CVE-2026-14089: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in PopupBlocker.</li>
	    <li>[513194241] Low CVE-2026-14090: Out of bounds read in CameraCapture.</li>
	    <li>[513208773] Low CVE-2026-14091: Use after free in DevTools.</li>
	    <li>[513212892] Low CVE-2026-14092: Insufficient policy enforcement in Privacy.</li>
	    <li>[513240099] Low CVE-2026-14093: Use after free in Cast.</li>
	    <li>[513264273] Low CVE-2026-14094: Use after free in Installer.</li>
	    <li>[513271007] Low CVE-2026-14095: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Browser.</li>
	    <li>[513310821] Low CVE-2026-14096: Object lifecycle issue in Input.</li>
	    <li>[513333529] Low CVE-2026-14097: Inappropriate implementation in WebAppInstalls.</li>
	    <li>[513375767] Low CVE-2026-14098: Inappropriate implementation in CSS.</li>
	    <li>[513382161] Low CVE-2026-14099: Use after free in Chrome for iOS.</li>
	    <li>[513383891] Low CVE-2026-14100: Insufficient data validation in NetworkCache.</li>
	    <li>[513454805] Low CVE-2026-14101: Insufficient policy enforcement in Sandbox.</li>
	    <li>[513455047] Low CVE-2026-14102: Use after free in Passwords.</li>
	    <li>[513465245] Low CVE-2026-14103: Use after free in SSL.</li>
	    <li>[513484193] Low CVE-2026-14104: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in WebAppInstalls.</li>
	    <li>[513528117] Low CVE-2026-14105: Insufficient policy enforcement in Speech.</li>
	    <li>[513532778] Low CVE-2026-14106: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Text.</li>
	    <li>[513544566] Low CVE-2026-14107: Use after free in Scheduling.</li>
	    <li>[513689974] Low CVE-2026-14108: Use after free in PDFium.</li>
	    <li>[513694957] Low CVE-2026-14109: Insufficient policy enforcement in Mojo.</li>
	    <li>[513698452] Low CVE-2026-14110: Inappropriate implementation in DarkMode.</li>
	    <li>[513710926] Low CVE-2026-14111: Use after free in WebProtect.</li>
	    <li>[513713946] Low CVE-2026-14112: Inappropriate implementation in Enterprise.</li>
	    <li>[513737335] Low CVE-2026-14113: Use after free in Updater.</li>
	    <li>[513743129] Low CVE-2026-14114: Inappropriate implementation in WebAppInstalls.</li>
	    <li>[513745699] Low CVE-2026-14115: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Cast.</li>
	    <li>[513747800] Low CVE-2026-14116: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in DevTools.</li>
	    <li>[513751020] Low CVE-2026-14117: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in DevTools.</li>
	    <li>[513772764] Low CVE-2026-14118: Insufficient data validation in DevTools.</li>
	    <li>[513775483] Low CVE-2026-14119: Type Confusion in Bluetooth.</li>
	    <li>[513777411] Low CVE-2026-14120: Inappropriate implementation in DevTools.</li>
	    <li>[513789382] Low CVE-2026-14121: Use after free in Chromoting.</li>
	    <li>[513824891] Low CVE-2026-14122: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in WebAppInstalls.</li>
	    <li>[513856644] Low CVE-2026-14123: Incorrect security UI in Chrome for iOS.</li>
	    <li>[513867710] Low CVE-2026-14124: Inappropriate implementation in CredentialProvider.</li>
	    <li>[513918431] Low CVE-2026-14125: Uninitialized Use in ANGLE.</li>
	    <li>[513992796] Low CVE-2026-14126: Incorrect security UI in UI.</li>
	    <li>[514009654] Low CVE-2026-14127: Inappropriate implementation in Printing.</li>
	    <li>[514015836] Low CVE-2026-14128: Insufficient data validation in Chrome for iOS.</li>
	    <li>[514018024] Low CVE-2026-14129: Incorrect security UI in PreviewTab.</li>
	    <li>[514019522] Low CVE-2026-14130: Incorrect security UI in Omnibox.</li>
	    <li>[514020982] Low CVE-2026-14131: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in WebAppInstalls.</li>
	    <li>[514039492] Low CVE-2026-14132: Inappropriate implementation in WebXR.</li>
	    <li>[514039947] Low CVE-2026-14133: Race in History Embeddings.</li>
	    <li>[514055973] Low CVE-2026-14134: Inappropriate implementation in Autofill.</li>
	    <li>[514058566] Low CVE-2026-14135: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Network.</li>
	    <li>[514068611] Low CVE-2026-14136: Incorrect security UI in Chrome for iOS.</li>
	    <li>[514070067] Low CVE-2026-14137: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Chrome for iOS.</li>
	    <li>[514071775] Low CVE-2026-14138: Inappropriate implementation in WebAppInstalls.</li>
	    <li>[514072495] Low CVE-2026-14139: Inappropriate implementation in TabStrip.</li>
	    <li>[514072607] Low CVE-2026-14140: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Input.</li>
	    <li>[514072867] Low CVE-2026-14141: Incorrect security UI in Document Picture-in-Picture.</li>
	    <li>[514073460] Low CVE-2026-14142: Inappropriate implementation in Extensions.</li>
	    <li>[514075028] Low CVE-2026-14143: Incorrect security UI in Passwords.</li>
	    <li>[514079793] Low CVE-2026-14144: Incorrect security UI in Views.</li>
	    <li>[514485825] Low CVE-2026-14145: Inappropriate implementation in CSS.</li>
	    <li>[514550047] Low CVE-2026-14146: Inappropriate implementation in CSS.</li>
	    <li>[514632767] Low CVE-2026-14147: Inappropriate implementation in CSS.</li>
	    <li>[515426873] Low CVE-2026-14148: Type Confusion in CSS.</li>
	    <li>[515427046] Low CVE-2026-14149: Use after free in Audio.</li>
	    <li>[517376041] Low CVE-2026-14150: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Speech.</li>
	    <li>[517381770] Low CVE-2026-14151: Inappropriate implementation in AI.</li>
	    <li>[517534944] Low CVE-2026-14152: Out of bounds write in ANGLE.</li>
	    <li>[517684077] Low CVE-2026-14153: Inappropriate implementation in Glic.</li>
	    <li>[517741170] Low CVE-2026-14154: Inappropriate implementation in DevTools.</li>
	    <li>[518246925] Low CVE-2026-14155: Insufficient policy enforcement in StorageAccessAPI.</li>
	    <li>[518247789] Low CVE-2026-14156: Policy bypass in StorageAccessAPI.</li>
	 </ul>
       </blockquote>
      </body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13774</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13775</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13776</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13777</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13778</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13779</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13780</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13781</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13782</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13783</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13784</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13785</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13786</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13787</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13788</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13789</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13790</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13791</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13792</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13793</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13794</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13795</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13796</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13797</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13798</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13799</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13800</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13801</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13802</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13803</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13804</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13805</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13806</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13807</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13808</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13809</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13810</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13811</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13812</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13813</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13814</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13815</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13816</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13817</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13818</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13819</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13820</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13821</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13822</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13823</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13824</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13825</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13826</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13827</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13828</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13829</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13830</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13831</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13832</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13833</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13834</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13835</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13836</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13837</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13838</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13839</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13840</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13841</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13842</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13843</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13844</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13845</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13846</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13847</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13848</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13849</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13850</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13851</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13852</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13853</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13854</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13855</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13856</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13857</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13858</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13859</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13860</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13861</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13862</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13863</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13864</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13865</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13866</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13867</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13868</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13869</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13870</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13871</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13872</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13873</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13874</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13875</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13876</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13877</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13878</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13879</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13880</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13881</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13882</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13883</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13884</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13885</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13886</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13887</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13888</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13889</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13890</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13891</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13892</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13893</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13894</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13895</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13896</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13897</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13898</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13899</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13900</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13901</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13902</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13903</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13904</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13905</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13906</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13907</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13908</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13909</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13910</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13911</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13912</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13913</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13914</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13915</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13916</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13917</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13918</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13919</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13920</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13921</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13922</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13923</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13924</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13925</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13926</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13927</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13928</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13929</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13930</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13931</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13932</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13933</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13934</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13935</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13936</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13937</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13938</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13939</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13940</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13941</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13942</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13943</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13944</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13945</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13946</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13947</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13948</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13949</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13950</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13951</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13952</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13953</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13954</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13955</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13956</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13957</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13958</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13959</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13960</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13961</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13962</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13963</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13964</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13965</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13966</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13967</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13968</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13969</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13970</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13971</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13972</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13973</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13974</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13975</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13976</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13977</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13978</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13979</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13980</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13981</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13982</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13983</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13984</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13985</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13986</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13987</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13988</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13989</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13990</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13991</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13992</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13993</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13994</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13995</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13996</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13997</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13998</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13999</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-14000</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-14001</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-14002</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-14003</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-14004</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-14005</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-14006</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-14007</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-14008</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-14009</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-14010</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-14011</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-14012</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-14013</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-14014</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-14015</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-14016</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-14017</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-14018</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-14019</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-14020</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-14021</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-14022</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-14023</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-14024</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-14025</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-14026</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-14027</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-14028</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-14030</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-14031</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-14032</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-14033</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-14034</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-14035</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-14036</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-14037</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-14038</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-14039</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-14040</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-14041</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-14042</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-14043</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-14044</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-14045</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-14046</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-14047</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-14048</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-14049</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-14050</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-14051</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-14052</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-14053</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-14054</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-14055</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-14056</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-14057</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-14058</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-14059</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-14060</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-14061</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-14062</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-14063</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-14064</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-14065</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-14066</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-14067</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-14068</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-14069</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-14070</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-14071</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-14072</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-14073</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-14074</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-14075</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-14076</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-14077</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-14078</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-14079</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-14080</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-14081</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-14082</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-14083</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-14084</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-14085</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-14086</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-14087</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-14088</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-14089</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-14090</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-14091</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-14092</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-14093</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-14094</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-14095</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-14096</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-14097</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-14098</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-14099</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-14100</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-14101</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-14102</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-14103</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-14104</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-14105</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-14106</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-14107</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-14108</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-14109</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-14110</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-14111</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-14112</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-14113</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-14114</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-14115</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-14116</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-14117</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-14118</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-14119</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-14120</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-14121</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-14122</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-14123</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-14124</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-14125</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-14126</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-14127</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-14128</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-14129</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-14130</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-14131</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-14132</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-14133</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-14134</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-14135</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-14136</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-14137</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-14138</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-14139</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-14140</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-14141</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-14142</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-14143</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-14144</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-14145</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-14146</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-14147</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-14148</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-14149</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-14150</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-14151</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-14152</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-14153</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-14154</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-14155</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-14156</cvename>
      <url>https://chromereleases.googleblog.com/2026/06/stable-channel-update-for-desktop_0175352312.html</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-06-30</discovery>
      <entry>2026-07-02</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="ffa897a0-756f-11f1-b291-a74de6bb0320">
    <topic>openvpn -- multiple vulnerabilities</topic>
    <affects>
      <package><name>openvpn</name> <range><lt>2.7.5</lt></range></package>
      <package><name>openvpn-devel</name> <range><lt>g20260701,2</lt></range></package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>The OpenVPN community project team reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://community.openvpn.net/Downloads#openvpn-275-released-1-july-2026">
	  <p>[...] OpenVPN 2.7.5 [...] is a bugfix release fixing several security issues:</p>
	  <ul>
	    <li>Fix use-after-free bug in ack_write_buf(), triggerable by a well-timed sequence of control channel + authentication packets (CVE-2026-12996)</li>
	    <li>Fix use-after-free bug in tls_wrap_reneg(), triggerable by suitable sequence of dynamic tls-crypt control-channel packets (CVE-2026-13117)</li>
	    <li>Fix server crash on reception of suitably malformed auth-token, if --auth-gen-token external-auth is active (CVE-2026-13122)</li>
	    <li>Fix memory-leak in tls-crypt-v2 client key handling that could lead to out-of-memory situations and subsequent server crashes (CVE-2026-12932)</li>
	    <li>Fix possible 1-byte buffer overrun on NTLMv2 proxy responses. (CVE-2026-11771)</li>
	    <li>Fix another memory leak on reception of suitable tls-crypt-v2 packets that could lead to an out of memory situation and server crash (CVE-2026-13698)</li>
	  </ul>
	</blockquote>
      </body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <url>https://github.com/OpenVPN/openvpn/blob/v2.7.5/Changes.rst#overview-of-changes-in-275</url>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11771</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-12932</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-12996</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13117</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13122</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13698</cvename>
      <url>https://community.openvpn.net/Downloads#openvpn-275-released-1-july-2026</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-07-01</discovery>
      <entry>2026-07-01</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="78910e7e-74e3-11f1-958d-bc241121aa0a">
    <topic>FreeBSD -- Multiple vulnerabilities in iconv(3)</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
	<name>FreeBSD-kernel</name>
	<range><ge>15.1</ge><lt>15.1_1</lt></range>
	<range><ge>15.0</ge><lt>15.0_11</lt></range>
	<range><ge>14.4</ge><lt>14.4_7</lt></range>
	<range><ge>14.3</ge><lt>14.3_16</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<h1>Problem Description:</h1>
	  <p>Several encoding modules, including HZ, UTF-7, VIQR, and ZW,
	  did not properly check the size of the caller-supplied output buffer
	  before writing converted characters.  [CVE-2026-58081]</p>
	  <p>The ISO-2022 encoding module used a stack buffer sized to MB_LEN_MAX
	  (6 bytes) for intermediate character output.  Some ISO-2022 variants
	  can require up to 10 bytes per character, in which case conversions
	  can trigger a stack buffer overflow of up to four bytes.
	  [CVE-2026-58082]</p>
	<h1>Impact:</h1>
	  <p>An application that uses iconv(3) to convert untrusted input
	  to or from one of the affected encodings may be vulnerable to buffer
	  overflows if it uses one of the affected encoding modules.</p>
      </body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-58081</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-58082</cvename>
      <freebsdsa>SA-26:49.iconv</freebsdsa>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-06-30</discovery>
      <entry>2026-07-01</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="43f9ca02-74e3-11f1-958d-bc241121aa0a">
    <topic>FreeBSD-kernel -- Kernel stack disclosure in 32-bit compatibility support</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
	<name>FreeBSD-kernel</name>
	<range><ge>15.0</ge><lt>15.0_11</lt></range>
	<range><ge>14.4</ge><lt>14.4_7</lt></range>
	<range><ge>14.3</ge><lt>14.3_16</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<h1>Problem Description:</h1>
	  <p>The compat32 kevent() handler translates a 64-bit kevent struct
	  into a stack- declared 32-bit struct.  It did not first zero the
	  stack struct.</p>
	<h1>Impact:</h1>
	  <p>An unprivileged user may observe a small amount of uninitialized
	  kernel stack data, which may contain sensitive information.</p>
      </body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-49425</cvename>
      <freebsdsa>SA-26:48.compat32</freebsdsa>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-06-30</discovery>
      <entry>2026-07-01</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="2355c475-74e3-11f1-958d-bc241121aa0a">
    <topic>FreeBSD -- Kernel stack disclosure in Linux compatibility layer</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
	<name>FreeBSD-kernel</name>
	<range><ge>15.0</ge><lt>15.0_11</lt></range>
	<range><ge>14.4</ge><lt>14.4_7</lt></range>
	<range><ge>14.3</ge><lt>14.3_16</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<h1>Problem Description:</h1>
	  <p>The Linux waitid() implementation translates a FreeBSD siginfo_t
	  struct into a stack-declared Linux siginfo_t.  It did not first
	  zero the stack struct.</p>
	<h1>Impact:</h1>
	  <p>An unprivileged user may observe 104 bytes of uninitialized
	  kernel stack data, which may contain sensitive information.</p>
      </body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-49424</cvename>
      <freebsdsa>SA-26:47.linux</freebsdsa>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-06-30</discovery>
      <entry>2026-07-01</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="fb1bf2ae-74e2-11f1-958d-bc241121aa0a">
    <topic>FreeBSD -- Remote DOS via uninitialized memory access in KTLS receive</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
	<name>FreeBSD-kernel</name>
	<range><ge>15.1</ge><lt>15.1_1</lt></range>
	<range><ge>15.0</ge><lt>15.0_11</lt></range>
	<range><ge>14.4</ge><lt>14.4_7</lt></range>
	<range><ge>14.3</ge><lt>14.3_16</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<h1>Problem Description:</h1>
	  <p>When building the iovec array for a received TLS 1.2 CBC record,
	  ktls_ocf_tls_cbc_decrypt() incremented the iovec index for every
	  mbuf in the chain, including mbufs that were skipped because they
	  contained only TLS header bytes.  This left uninitialized entries
	  in the iovec array.  The iovec array was allocated without zeroing.</p>
	<h1>Impact:</h1>
	  <p>A remote TLS peer can cause the kernel to read from uninitialized
	  iovec entries during HMAC computation, resulting in a kernel panic.
	  The peer must be able to control TCP segmentation such that the
	  first mbuf of a CBC record contains only the 5-byte TLS record
	  header.</p>
      </body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-49423</cvename>
      <freebsdsa>SA-26:46.ktls</freebsdsa>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-06-30</discovery>
      <entry>2026-07-01</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="cd658f09-74e2-11f1-958d-bc241121aa0a">
    <topic>FreeBSD -- Incorrect audit records for ptrace(2) syscall requests</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
	<name>FreeBSD-kernel</name>
	<range><ge>15.1</ge><lt>15.1_1</lt></range>
	<range><ge>15.0</ge><lt>15.0_11</lt></range>
	<range><ge>14.4</ge><lt>14.4_7</lt></range>
	<range><ge>14.3</ge><lt>14.3_16</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<h1>Problem Description:</h1>
	  <p>When auditing a system call executed via ptrace(PT_SC_REMOTE),
	  the kernel passed the return value of an internal setup function
	  to AUDIT_SYSCALL_EXIT() rather than the actual result of the executed
	  system call.  As a result, committed audit records for system calls
	  which returned an error do not reflect the true outcome of the
	  operation.  That is, they indicate that the operation succeeded
	  when it in fact failed.</p>
	<h1>Impact:</h1>
	  <p>Audit records for system calls executed via ptrace(PT_SC_REMOTE)
	  may show an incorrect error status.  An attacker with the ability
	  to debug a process could use this to produce misleading audit trails,
	  potentially undermining audit-based Intrusion Detection Systems
	  (IDS).</p>
      </body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-49426</cvename>
      <freebsdsa>SA-26:45.audit</freebsdsa>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-06-30</discovery>
      <entry>2026-07-01</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="91017b3b-74e2-11f1-958d-bc241121aa0a">
    <topic>FreeBSD -- Multiple vulnerabilities in POSIX largepage objects</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
	<name>FreeBSD-kernel</name>
	<range><ge>15.1</ge><lt>15.1_1</lt></range>
	<range><ge>15.0</ge><lt>15.0_11</lt></range>
	<range><ge>14.4</ge><lt>14.4_7</lt></range>
	<range><ge>14.3</ge><lt>14.3_16</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<h1>Problem Description:</h1>
	  <p>Pages belonging to largepage shared memory objects were not
	  explicitly wired.  When sendfile(2) transmitted such an object with
	  the SF_NOCACHE flag, it freed the underlying pages after transmission
	  even though existing mappings still referred to them.  [CVE-2026-49427]</p>
	  <p>Separately, certain system calls, such open(2) with the O_TRUNC
	  flag set, and fspacectl(2), could incorrectly free memory in largepage
	  objects.  These operations are not permitted on largepage objects,
	  but the implementation did not verify this.  [CVE-2026-49428]</p>
	<h1>Impact:</h1>
	  <p>An unprivileged local user can abuse the bug to access freed
	  kernel memory.  This can be exploited to escalate privileges.</p>
      </body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-49427</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-49428</cvename>
      <freebsdsa>SA-26:44.posixshm</freebsdsa>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-06-30</discovery>
      <entry>2026-07-01</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="6c547c1b-74e2-11f1-958d-bc241121aa0a">
    <topic>FreeBSD -- Use-after-free in TCP RACK stack option handler</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
	<name>FreeBSD-kernel</name>
	<range><ge>15.1</ge><lt>15.1_1</lt></range>
	<range><ge>15.0</ge><lt>15.0_11</lt></range>
	<range><ge>14.4</ge><lt>14.4_7</lt></range>
	<range><ge>14.3</ge><lt>14.3_16</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<h1>Problem Description:</h1>
	  <p>The RACK setsockopt(2) handler drops the connection lock in
	  order to copy option data from userspace, then reacquires the lock.
	  After reacquiring, it verifies that the TCP stack had not been
	  switched away, but did not reload its pointer to the stack's
	  per-connection control block.  If userspace switches stacks twice
	  during this window, the check will succeed but the saved pointer
	  will refer to freed memory.</p>
	<h1>Impact:</h1>
	  <p>The bug may be exploitable by an unprivileged local user to
	  escalate privileges.</p>
      </body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-49422</cvename>
      <freebsdsa>SA-26:43.tcp</freebsdsa>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-06-30</discovery>
      <entry>2026-07-01</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="33fd66d1-74e2-11f1-958d-bc241121aa0a">
    <topic>FreeBSD -- unlinkat(2) ignores AT_RESOLVE_BENEATH flag</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
	<name>FreeBSD-kernel</name>
	<range><ge>15.1</ge><lt>15.1_1</lt></range>
	<range><ge>15.0</ge><lt>15.0_11</lt></range>
	<range><ge>14.4</ge><lt>14.4_7</lt></range>
	<range><ge>14.3</ge><lt>14.3_16</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<h1>Problem Description:</h1>
	  <p>The kernel function that implements unlinkat(2) and funlinkat(2)
	  validated the AT_RESOLVE_BENEATH flag but failed to pass it through
	  to the underlying path lookup.  The flag was silently dropped, so
	  path resolution was not actually restricted.</p>
	<h1>Impact:</h1>
	  <p>A process that uses AT_RESOLVE_BENEATH with unlinkat(2) or
	  funlinkat(2) to confine path resolution can in fact resolve paths
	  above the starting directory.  A caller relying on this flag for
	  path containment may delete files outside the intended directory
	  tree.</p>
      </body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-49421</cvename>
      <freebsdsa>SA-26:42.unlinkat</freebsdsa>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-06-30</discovery>
      <entry>2026-07-01</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="f5dd96dd-74e1-11f1-958d-bc241121aa0a">
    <topic>FreeBSD -- Buffer overflow in libalias RTSP handler</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
	<name>FreeBSD-kernel</name>
	<range><ge>15.1</ge><lt>15.1_1</lt></range>
	<range><ge>15.0</ge><lt>15.0_11</lt></range>
	<range><ge>14.4</ge><lt>14.4_7</lt></range>
	<range><ge>14.3</ge><lt>14.3_16</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<h1>Problem Description:</h1>
	  <p>The RTSP handler in libalias rewrote outgoing packets into a
	  fixed-length stack buffer without checking whether the rewritten
	  data fit in the buffer, or whether the result fit back in the
	  original packet.</p>
	<h1>Impact:</h1>
	  <p>A host sending crafted RTSP traffic from inside a NAT gateway
	  using libalias can overflow a stack buffer, potentially achieving
	  remote code execution in the kernel (when using ipfw(4) NAT) or in
	  the natd(8) process (which generally runs as the root user).</p>
      </body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-49420</cvename>
      <freebsdsa>SA-26:41.libalias</freebsdsa>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-06-30</discovery>
      <entry>2026-07-01</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="9534b664-74e1-11f1-958d-bc241121aa0a">
    <topic>FreeBSD -- Multiple vulnerabilities in OpenZFS</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
	<name>FreeBSD-kernel</name>
	<range><ge>15.1</ge><lt>15.1_1</lt></range>
	<range><ge>15.0</ge><lt>15.0_11</lt></range>
	<range><ge>14.4</ge><lt>14.4_7</lt></range>
	<range><ge>14.3</ge><lt>14.3_16</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<h1>Problem Description:</h1>
	  <p>The ZFS_IOC_USERSPACE_MANY ioctl, used by zfs-userspace(8),
	  truncated a 64-bit output buffer size to a 32-bit integer for the
	  kernel allocation, but used the original 64-bit size as the buffer
	  limit when writing records.</p>
	  <p>The ZFS_IOC_RECV_NEW ioctl, in the heal receive path, similarly
	  truncated a 64-bit payload size to a 32-bit integer for allocation,
	  then used the original 64-bit size as the length for a byteswap
	  operation.</p>
	  <p>The ZFS_IOC_SET_PROP ioctl, used by zfs-set(8), incorrectly validated
	  the calling user such that an unprivileged user is able to set
	  metadata on a dataset indicating that the dataset has received
	  properties from a zfs-recv(8) stream.</p>
	<h1>Impact:</h1>
	  <p>A local user with the "userused" delegated ZFS permission can
	  trigger a kernel heap overflow via the ZFS_IOC_USERSPACE_MANY ioctl,
	  potentially escalating privileges.  [CVE-2026-49429]</p>
	  <p>A local user with the "receive" delegated ZFS permission can trigger
	  kernel memory corruption via ZFS_IOC_RECV_NEW by sending a crafted
	  receive stream in heal mode.  [CVE-2026-49430]</p>
	  <p>Any local user can set the internal ZFS metadata flag "$hasrecvd"
	  on datasets via ZFS_IOC_SET_PROP.  [CVE-2026-49431]</p>
      </body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-49429</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-49430</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-49431</cvename>
      <freebsdsa>SA-26:40.zfs</freebsdsa>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-06-30</discovery>
      <entry>2026-07-01</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="4b0d0a49-74e1-11f1-958d-bc241121aa0a">
    <topic>FreeBSD -- Local privilege escalation via execve(2) TOCTOU race</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
	<name>FreeBSD-kernel</name>
	<range><ge>15.1</ge><lt>15.1_1</lt></range>
	<range><ge>15.0</ge><lt>15.0_11</lt></range>
	<range><ge>14.4</ge><lt>14.4_7</lt></range>
	<range><ge>14.3</ge><lt>14.3_16</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<h1>Problem Description:</h1>
	  <p>During execve(2) of a SUID binary, the new virtual address space
	  is installed before the process credentials are updated.  During
	  this window, a process running as the same user can access the
	  target process's memory via procfs or linprocfs, because the kernel's
	  debugging permission check still saw the original credentials.</p>
	<h1>Impact:</h1>
	  <p>An unprivileged local user can exploit this race to modify the
	  address space of a SUID binary before its credentials are elevated,
	  potentially gaining full control of the affected system.</p>
      </body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-49415</cvename>
      <freebsdsa>SA-26:39.execve</freebsdsa>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-06-30</discovery>
      <entry>2026-07-01</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="a65c31d1-74e0-11f1-958d-bc241121aa0a">
    <topic>FreeBSD -- Jail reference count underflow</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
	<name>FreeBSD-kernel</name>
	<range><ge>15.1</ge><lt>15.1_1</lt></range>
	<range><ge>15.0</ge><lt>15.0_11</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<h1>Problem Description:</h1>
	  <p>When the JAIL_AT_DESC flag is specified, kern_jail_set() and
	  kern_jail_get() released the reference to the caller's current
	  prison before looking up the jail descriptor.  If the descriptor
	  lookup failed, error-handling paths released the same reference a
	  second time.</p>
	<h1>Impact:</h1>
	  <p>An unprivileged local user can trigger a prison reference count
	  underflow, which may cause the prison structure to be freed while
	  still in use.  When this is done on the jail host, the bug will
	  generally result in an immediate panic.  However, if the user is
	  running in a jail, then it may be possible to exploit the bug to
	  elevate privileges.</p>
      </body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-49419</cvename>
      <freebsdsa>SA-26:38.jail</freebsdsa>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-06-30</discovery>
      <entry>2026-07-01</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="5a34b147-74e0-11f1-958d-bc241121aa0a">
    <topic>FreeBSD -- Use-after-free in device pager page list</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
	<name>FreeBSD-kernel</name>
	<range><ge>15.1</ge><lt>15.1_1</lt></range>
	<range><ge>15.0</ge><lt>15.0_11</lt></range>
	<range><ge>14.4</ge><lt>14.4_7</lt></range>
	<range><ge>14.3</ge><lt>14.3_16</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<h1>Problem Description:</h1>
	  <p>When msync(MS_INVALIDATE) is called on a mapping of an unmanaged
	  device object, the physical pages in the mapping range are marked
	  invalid but remain in the pager's page list.  A subsequent page
	  fault will cause the fault handler to re-insert the page into the
	  object's list.  This corrupts the list, and on object destruction
	  the page is freed twice.</p>
	<h1>Impact:</h1>
	  <p>An unprivileged local user with access to a device that provides
	  memory-mapped I/O can trigger a use-after-free in the kernel, though
	  this is limited to a pool of objects ("fictitious pages") that are
	  never recycled for a different purpose.  It may be possible to
	  exploit this to escalate privileges.</p>
      </body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-49418</cvename>
      <freebsdsa>SA-26:37.vm</freebsdsa>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-06-30</discovery>
      <entry>2026-07-01</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="5b7cb356-749c-11f1-8a71-50ebf6bdf8e9">
    <topic>icinga2 -- Improper access control for JSON-RPC update certificate messages</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
      <name>icinga2</name>
      <range><lt>2.16.2</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>The Icinga team reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://github.com/Icinga/icinga2/security/advisories/GHSA-vj39-ww8j-vvx5">
	  <p>The code handling certificate update JSON-RPC messages was
	    flawed and did not properly validate the sender of the message,
	    allowing an unauthenticated attacker that can connect to Icinga
	    2 to update both the own certificate as well as the trusted CA
	    certificate. Updating the trusted CA allows an attacker to
	    impersonate a trusted node, allowing them to take control over
	    the node.</p>
	  <p>Any Icinga 2 instance that is accessible to an attacker over
	    the network is affected.</p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <url>https://github.com/Icinga/icinga2/security/advisories/GHSA-vj39-ww8j-vvx5</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-06-29</discovery>
      <entry>2026-06-30</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="7701f760-745c-11f1-bc50-6cc21735f730">
    <topic>PostgresSQL JDBC -- Silent channel-binding authentication downgrade via unsupported certificate algorithms</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
	<name>postgresql-jdbc</name>
	<range><ge>47.7.4</ge><lt>47.7.12</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>PostgreSQL project reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://github.com/pgjdbc/pgjdbc/security/advisories/GHSA-j92g-9f8w-j867">
	  <p>
	    channelBinding=require connections can be silently
	    downgraded from SCRAM-SHA-256-PLUS (with channel
	    binding) to plain SCRAM-SHA-256 (without it), losing the
	    man-in-the-middle protection the setting is meant to
	    guarantee. An attacker who can intercept the TLS
	    connection triggers the downgrade with a certificate
	    whose signature algorithm has no tls-server-end-point
	    channel-binding hash. Examples are Ed25519, Ed448, and
	    post-quantum algorithms.
	  </p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-54291</cvename>
      <url>https://github.com/pgjdbc/pgjdbc/security/advisories/GHSA-j92g-9f8w-j867</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-06-30</discovery>
      <entry>2026-06-30</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="5181294e-7471-11f1-8de5-a8a1599412c6">
    <topic>chromium -- security fixes</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
       <name>chromium</name>
       <range><lt>149.0.7827.200</lt></range>
      </package>
      <package>
       <name>ungoogled-chromium</name>
       <range><lt>149.0.7827.200</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
       <p>Chrome Releases reports:</p>
       <blockquote cite="https://chromereleases.googleblog.com/2026/06/stable-channel-update-for-desktop_01245939337.html">
	 <p>This update includes 3 security fixes:</p>
	 <ul>
	    <li>[513138301] High CVE-2026-13281: Integer overflow in Mojo. Reported by Google on 2026-05-14</li>
	    <li>[517522620] High CVE-2026-13282: Use after free in Payments. Reported by Google on 2026-05-28</li>
	    <li>[522561151] High CVE-2026-13283: Use after free in AdFilter. Reported by Google on 2026-06-11</li>
	 </ul>
       </blockquote>
      </body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13281</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13282</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-13283</cvename>
      <url>https://chromereleases.googleblog.com/2026/06/stable-channel-update-for-desktop_01245939337.html</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-06-25</discovery>
      <entry>2026-06-30</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="bebbc065-73d2-11f1-910d-3c7c3fba4204">
    <topic>NSD -- vulnerabilities</topic>
    <affects>
    <package>
	<name>nsd</name>
	<range><lt>4.14.3</lt></range>
    </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>NLnet Labs reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://www.nlnetlabs.nl/downloads/nsd/CVE-2026-12244.txt">
	  <p>CVE-2026-12244: A specially crafted SVCB RR can cause a heap overflow of up to 65509 attacker controlled bytes.</p>
	  <p>If NSD is configured as secondary for a zone, the primary of that zone can crash NSD with an AXFR containing a DNS message with a special crafted SVCB RR with an rdata size of 65512, that let's an (uint16_t) variable that is used to allocate space needed for the RR wrap (because total size > 65535), causing a heap overflow. The attacker can perform a controlled (RCE class) head write of up to 65509 bytes<br/><br/>
Even though the data is from a configured primary inside NSD's trust boundary, we do consider the risk significant enough for multi-tenant secondary DNS deployments, given the potential severity of the attack.</p>
	</blockquote>
	<blockquote cite="https://www.nlnetlabs.nl/downloads/nsd/CVE-2026-12245.txt">
	  <p>CVE-2026-12245: An attacker can keep all children in a crash-restart loop denying DoT service.</p>
	  <p>NSD from version 4.13.0 has a heap use-after-free bug in logging errors on TLS connections, causing a crash of the server process, which can be triggered trivially by sending a DNS query over a DoT connection, and closing the connection without reading the response.<br/><br/>
Any client with access to the DoT port (853) can trigger this. Even though a new server process will be immediately reforked to replace the crashed one, an attacker can keep all children in a crash-restart loop denying DoT service.</p>
	</blockquote>
	<blockquote cite="https://www.nlnetlabs.nl/downloads/nsd/CVE-2026-12246.txt">
	  <p>CVE-2026-12246: The RR type APL rdata address, if too large, causes out of bounds write on the
stack, when the zonefile is written out.</p>
	  <p>NSD version 4.14.0 introduced a bug where a specially crafted APL RR, with an adflength larger than permitted for the address family will overwrite the stack when the zone is written to disk, with a maximum of 111 attacker controlled bytes.<br/><br/>
Even though the data is from a configured primary inside NSD's trust boundary, we do consider the risk significant enough for multi-tenant secondary DNS deployments, where a primary could introduce the rogue APL with the secondary not noticing or only after the fact.</p>
	</blockquote>
	<blockquote cite="https://www.nlnetlabs.nl/downloads/nsd/CVE-2026-12490.txt">
	  <p>CVE-2026-12490: Secondaries authenticated by a client certificate to transfer a zone over TLS,
can bypass verification by transferring over TCP.</p>
	  <p>When a "provide-xfr" is given with a "tls-auth-name", a secondary requesting a transfer should provide a client certificate with that name. However, no client certificate is needed when the request comes in over TLS over the regular "tls-port" (and not the "tls-auth-port") or over over TCP over the regular port, when the other conditions of the "provide-xfr" rule match.<br/><br/>
The transfer security restrictions for client certificates can be bypassed completely if the attacker can match the other access control conditions, and the "tls-auth-xfr-only" option is not explicitly set to "yes" (which it by default is not)</p>
	</blockquote>
	<p>Thanks to people below for reporting and disclosing these vulnerabilities:</p>
	<ul>
	  <li>Qifan Zhang from Palo Alto Networks</li>
	  <li>Haruki Oyama from Waseda University</li>
	  <li>zhangph</li>
	</ul>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-12244</cvename>
      <url>https://www.nlnetlabs.nl/downloads/nsd/CVE-2026-12244.txt</url>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-12245</cvename>
      <url>https://www.nlnetlabs.nl/downloads/nsd/CVE-2026-12245.txt</url>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-12246</cvename>
      <url>https://www.nlnetlabs.nl/downloads/nsd/CVE-2026-12246.txt</url>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-12490</cvename>
      <url>https://www.nlnetlabs.nl/downloads/nsd/CVE-2026-12490.txt</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-06-25</discovery>
      <entry>2026-06-29</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="0f3342e3-73ba-11f1-910d-3c7c3fba4204">
    <topic>rclone -- Unauthenticated command execution in `rclone rcd --rc-serve` via inline remote instantiation</topic>
    <affects>
    <package>
	<name>rclone</name>
	<range><ge>1.46.0</ge><lt>1.74.3</lt></range>
    </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p><a href="https://github.com/rclone/rclone/security/advisories/GHSA-qw24-gh76-8rvv">https://github.com/rclone/rclone/security/advisories/GHSA-qw24-gh76-8rvv</a> reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://github.com/rclone/rclone/security/advisories/GHSA-qw24-gh76-8rvv">
	  <p>Rclone is a command-line program to sync files and directories to
and from different cloud storage providers.<br/>From 1.46.0 until 1.74.3, rclone rcd --rc-serve accepts unauthenticated GET and HEAD
requests to paths of the form: /[remote:path]/object.<br/>The remote
value is parsed from the URL and passed to normal backend initialization.
Inline remote configuration can set backend options that execute
local commands during initialization.<br/>As a result, a single
unauthenticated GET or HEAD request can execute a command as the
rclone process user.</p>
	<p>Thanks to <a href="https://github.com/ncw">Nick Craig-Wood</a> for reporting this vulnerability.</p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-49980</cvename>
      <url>https://cveawg.mitre.org/api/cve/CVE-2026-49980</url>
      <url>https://github.com/rclone/rclone/security/advisories/GHSA-qw24-gh76-8rvv</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-06-24</discovery>
      <entry>2026-06-29</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="a8614190-73b4-11f1-910d-3c7c3fba4204">
    <topic>PowerDNS -- vulnerabilities</topic>
    <affects>
    <package>
	<name>powerdns</name>
	<range><lt>5.1.2</lt></range>
    </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>PowerDNS Team reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://doc.powerdns.com/authoritative/security-advisories/powerdns-advisory-2026-05.html">
	<ul>
	  <li>CVE-2026-33257: Insufficient input validation of internal webserver</li>
	  <li>CVE-2026-33260: Insufficient input validation of internal webserver</li>
	  <li>CVE-2026-33608: Incomplete domain name sanitization during Bind autosecondary zone transfer</li>
	  <li>CVE-2026-33609: LDAP DN injection</li>
	  <li>CVE-2026-33610: Possible file descriptor exhaustion in forward-dnsupdate</li>
	  <li>CVE-2026-33611: Insufficient validation of HTTPS and SVCB records</li>
	</ul>
	<p>Thanks to people below for reporting these vulnerabilities:</p>
	<ul>
	  <li>Vitaly Simonovich</li>
	  <li>Cavid</li>
	  <li>Tibs</li>
	  <li>ylwango613</li>
	</ul>
	</blockquote>
	<blockquote cite="https://doc.powerdns.com/authoritative/security-advisories/powerdns-advisory-2026-07.html">
	<ul>
	  <li>CVE-2026-42005: Insufficient input validation of internal web server</li>
	</ul>
	<p>Thanks to ilya rozentsvaig for reporting this vulnerability.</p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-33257</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-33260</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-33608</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-33609</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-33610</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-33611</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-42005</cvename>
      <url>https://doc.powerdns.com/authoritative/security-advisories/powerdns-advisory-2026-05.html</url>
      <url>https://doc.powerdns.com/authoritative/security-advisories/powerdns-advisory-2026-07.html</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-02-16</discovery>
      <entry>2026-06-29</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="62c4ed54-73aa-11f1-910d-3c7c3fba4204">
    <topic>powerdns-recursor -- vulnerabilities</topic>
    <affects>
   <package>
	<name>powerdns-recursor</name>
	<range><lt>5.4.3</lt></range>
   </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>PowerDNS Team reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://doc.powerdns.com/recursor/security-advisories/powerdns-advisory-2026-08.html">
	<ul>
	  <li>CVE-2026-3361: ZoneToCache can poison the cache</li>
	  <li>CVE-2026-40012: Information about ECS zero scoped answers might leak to clients that use a specific ECS</li>
	  <li>CVE-2026-42005: Unbounded resource consumption in internal webserver</li>
	  <li>CVE-2026-42387: Insufficient input validation in ZoneToCache</li>
	  <li>CVE-2026-42388: Missing input validation for catalog zones</li>
	  <li>CVE-2026-42389: Reject more queries with invalid header values</li>
	  <li>CVE-2026-42390: ZONEMD validation can be bypassed</li>
	  <li>CVE-2026-52690: Spoofed answers can mark an authoritative non-EDNS capable</li>
	</ul>
	<p>Thanks to people below for reporting these vulnerabilities.</p>
	<ul>
	  <li>Danial Mahadzir</li>
	  <li>ilya rozentsvaig</li>
	  <li>Vitaly Simonovich</li>
	  <li>ylwango613</li>
	  <li>nurmukhammyed</li>
	  <li>Mehtab Zafar</li>
	</ul>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-3361</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-40012</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-42005</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-42387</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-42388</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-42389</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-42390</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-52690</cvename>
      <url>https://doc.powerdns.com/recursor/security-advisories/powerdns-advisory-2026-08.html</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-04-04</discovery>
      <entry>2026-06-29</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="6c0e17cf-73a0-11f1-910d-3c7c3fba4204">
    <topic>DNSdist -- vulnerabilities</topic>
    <affects>
    <package>
	<name>dnsdist</name>
	<range><lt>2.0.7</lt></range>
    </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>The DNSdist team reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://www.dnsdist.org/security-advisories/powerdns-advisory-for-dnsdist-2026-09.html">
	<ul>
	  <li>CVE-2026-40011: Prometheus denial of service via crafted DNS queries</li>
	  <li>CVE-2026-42004: EDNS options smuggling</li>
	  <li>CVE-2026-42005: Insufficient input validation of internal web server</li>
	  <li>CVE-2026-40208: Denial of service via DoH3 queries</li>
	  <li>CVE-2026-40209: Denial of service via IXFR queries</li>
	  <li>CVE-2026-40210: Out-of-bounds read in SetMacAddrAction</li>
	  <li>CVE-2026-40211: Denial of service via crafted DoH3 queries</li>
	</ul>
	<p>Thanks to people below for reporting these vulnerabilities.</p>
	<ul>
	  <li>Haruki Oyama (Waseda University)</li>
	  <li>Vitaly Simonovich</li>
	  <li>ilya rozentsvaig</li>
	  <li>ylwango613</li>
	  <li>Qifan Zhang (Palo Alto Networks)</li>
	  <li>Mehtab Zafar</li>
	</ul>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-40011</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-42004</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-42005</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-40208</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-40209</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-40210</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-40211</cvename>
      <url>https://www.dnsdist.org/security-advisories/powerdns-advisory-for-dnsdist-2026-09.html</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-06-25</discovery>
      <entry>2026-06-29</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="4e82a0e6-6801-42c6-8fb6-91b6b275a9e1">
    <topic>gstreamer1 -- multiple vulnerabilities</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
	<name>gstreamer1-libav</name>
	<name>gstreamer1-plugins</name>
	<name>gstreamer1-plugins-bad</name>
	<name>gstreamer1-plugins-good</name>
	<name>gstreamer1-plugins-ugly</name>
	<range><lt>1.28.4</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>The GStreamer project reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://gstreamer.freedesktop.org/security/">
	  <p>Multiple security issues were identified and fixed in the GStreamer framework.</p>
	  <ul>
	    <li>GStreamer-SA-2026-0030: Missing bounds checks in RTCP SDES packet parsing</li>
	    <li>GStreamer-SA-2026-0031: Integer overflow and truncation in MXF demuxer</li>
	    <li>GStreamer-SA-2026-0032: Out-of-bounds read and write in XMP tag parser</li>
	    <li>GStreamer-SA-2026-0033: Out-of-bounds read and modification of const data in ID3v2 parser</li>
	    <li>GStreamer-SA-2026-0034: Division by zero in mDVDsub subtitle parser</li>
	    <li>GStreamer-SA-2026-0035: Integer overflow in WavPack decoder</li>
	    <li>GStreamer-SA-2026-0036: Out-of-bounds read in SBC audio parser header parsing</li>
	    <li>GStreamer-SA-2026-0037: Heap corruption in gst-libav AV protocol pipe</li>
	    <li>GStreamer-SA-2026-0038: Memory leak and NULL pointer dereference in gst-libav demuxer</li>
	    <li>GStreamer-SA-2026-0039: Assertion in AV1 parser tile data parsing</li>
	    <li>GStreamer-SA-2026-0040: Out-of-bounds read in VA JPEG decoder segment parsing</li>
	    <li>GStreamer-SA-2026-0042: Out-of-bounds reads and integer overflows in RealMedia demuxer</li>
	    <li>GStreamer-SA-2026-0043: Out-of-bounds read and write in RFB source</li>
	    <li>GStreamer-SA-2026-0045: Out-of-bounds reads in PCAP parser due to missing bounds checks</li>
	    <li>GStreamer-SA-2026-0046: Integer overflow in VMNC decoder cursor payload size calculation</li>
	    <li>GStreamer-SA-2026-0047: One-byte out-of-bounds read in H.264 NAL unit parser</li>
	    <li>GStreamer-SA-2026-0048: Out-of-bounds read in H.266 parser VUI aspect ratio parsing</li>
	  </ul>
	</blockquote>
      </body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-12891</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-12892</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-12893</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-52717</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-52718</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-52719</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-52720</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-52721</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-52722</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-53703</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-53704</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-53705</cvename>
      <url>https://gstreamer.freedesktop.org/security/sa-2026-0030.html</url>
      <url>https://gstreamer.freedesktop.org/security/sa-2026-0031.html</url>
      <url>https://gstreamer.freedesktop.org/security/sa-2026-0032.html</url>
      <url>https://gstreamer.freedesktop.org/security/sa-2026-0033.html</url>
      <url>https://gstreamer.freedesktop.org/security/sa-2026-0034.html</url>
      <url>https://gstreamer.freedesktop.org/security/sa-2026-0035.html</url>
      <url>https://gstreamer.freedesktop.org/security/sa-2026-0036.html</url>
      <url>https://gstreamer.freedesktop.org/security/sa-2026-0037.html</url>
      <url>https://gstreamer.freedesktop.org/security/sa-2026-0038.html</url>
      <url>https://gstreamer.freedesktop.org/security/sa-2026-0039.html</url>
      <url>https://gstreamer.freedesktop.org/security/sa-2026-0040.html</url>
      <url>https://gstreamer.freedesktop.org/security/sa-2026-0042.html</url>
      <url>https://gstreamer.freedesktop.org/security/sa-2026-0043.html</url>
      <url>https://gstreamer.freedesktop.org/security/sa-2026-0045.html</url>
      <url>https://gstreamer.freedesktop.org/security/sa-2026-0046.html</url>
      <url>https://gstreamer.freedesktop.org/security/sa-2026-0047.html</url>
      <url>https://gstreamer.freedesktop.org/security/sa-2026-0048.html</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-06-12</discovery>
      <entry>2026-06-29</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="d06b1fa2-731f-11f1-a0d2-589cfc10a551">
    <topic>Multiple vulnerability found in Expat</topic>
    <affects>
<package>
<name>expat</name>
<name>linux-c7-expat</name>
<name>linux-rl9-expat</name>
<range><lt>2.8.2</lt></range>
</package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<blockquote cite="https://blog.hartwork.org/posts/expat-2-8-2-released/">
	  <p>Expat 2.8.2 was released yesterday. The key motivation for cutting a release and doing so now was</p>
	  <p>getting security and non-security bugsfixes out to users. On the security side,</p>
	  <p>13 vulnerabilities have been fixed:</p>
	   <ul>
	    <li>CVE-2026-50219: missing control flow integrity checks</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-56131: missing control flow integrity checks</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-56132: out-of-bounds write</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-56403: integer overflow</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-56404: integer overflow</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-56405: integer overflow</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-56406: integer overflow</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-56407: integer overflow</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-56408: integer overflow</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-56409: integer overflow</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-56410: integer overflow</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-56411: integer overflow</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-56412: missing control flow integrity checks</li>
	  </ul>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-50219</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-56131</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-56132</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-56403</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-56404</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-56405</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-56406</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-56407</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-56408</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-56409</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-56410</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-56411</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-56412</cvename>
      <url>https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-50219</url>
      <url>https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-56131</url>
      <url>https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-56132</url>
      <url>https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-56403</url>
      <url>https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-56404</url>
      <url>https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-56405</url>
      <url>https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-56406</url>
      <url>https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-56407</url>
      <url>https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-56408</url>
      <url>https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-56409</url>
      <url>https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-56410</url>
      <url>https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-56411</url>
      <url>https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-56412</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-06-25</discovery>
      <entry>2026-06-28</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="f00e2de8-7d30-48d2-a43d-68206347dea6">
    <topic>gitea -- multiple vulnerabilities</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
       <name>gitea</name>
       <range><lt>1.26.4</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
      <p>The Gitea team reports:</p>
       <ul>
       <li>CVE-2026-27783: incorrect read permission check</li>
       <li>CVE-2026-25714: public-only token filtering bypass</li>
       <li>CVE-2026-20706: missing token scope checking</li>
       <li>CVE-2026-27771: unauthenticated access to private container images</li>
       <li>CVE-2026-28744: git smart HTTP request scope bug</li>
       <li>CVE-2026-28699: basic auth bug</li>
       <li>CVE-2026-26231: maintainer edit permission escalation</li>
       <li>CVE-2026-20896: reverse proxy trusted proxies misconfiguration allowing user impersonation</li>
       <li>CVE-2026-22874: incomplete SSRF protection in webhooks and migrations</li>
       <li>CVE-2026-27775: branch write permission cache escalation</li>
       <li>CVE-2026-27761: RSS/Atom feed token scope not enforced</li>
       <li>CVE-2026-25038: private organization labels leaked to non-members</li>
       <li>CVE-2026-24451: fork sync allowed after base repo access revoked</li>
       <li>CVE-2026-20779: TOTP passcode reuse across login surfaces (TOCTOU race)</li>
       <li>CVE-2026-28740: cross-repository LFS object reuse without Code-unit access</li>
       <li>OAuth2 callback could auto-reactivate disabled users</li>
       </ul>
      </body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-27783</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-25714</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-20706</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-27771</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-28744</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-28699</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-26231</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-20896</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-22874</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-27775</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-27761</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-25038</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-24451</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-20779</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-28740</cvename>
      <url>https://blog.gitea.com/release-of-1.26.2/</url>
      <url>https://blog.gitea.com/release-of-1.26.3-and-1.26.4/</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-05-20</discovery>
      <entry>2026-06-28</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="ba8d239f-709f-11f1-a30e-28d2443e6cfa">
    <topic>ffmpeg -- Out-of-bounds write</topic>
    <affects>
    <package>
	<name>ffmpeg</name>
	<range><lt>8.1.2,1</lt></range>
    </package>
    <package>
	<name>ffmpeg4</name>
	<range><lt>4.4.7</lt></range>
    </package>
    <package>
	<name>ffmpeg6</name>
	<range><lt>6.1.6</lt></range>
    </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>https://code.ffmpeg.org/FFmpeg/FFmpeg/pulls/23159 reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://code.ffmpeg.org/FFmpeg/FFmpeg/pulls/23159">
	  <p>An out-of-bounds write vulnerability in FFmpeg's libavcodec library,
specifically in the MagicYUV decoder, allows denial-of-service and,
in some cases, can be exploited for remote code execution. This
vulnerability is associated with the file libavcodec/magicyuv.C.
This issue affects FFmpeg before version 8.1.2.</p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-8461</cvename>
      <url>https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-8461</url>
      <url>https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-qff7-4q6c-m8h6</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-06-18</discovery>
      <entry>2026-06-25</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="ee1e7aef-7117-11f1-873f-2cf05da270f3">
    <topic>Gitlab -- Vulnerabilities</topic>
    <affects>
<package>
	<name>gitlab-ce</name>
	<name>gitlab-ee</name>
	<range><ge>19.1.0</ge><lt>19.1.1</lt></range>
	<range><ge>19.0.0</ge><lt>19.0.3</lt></range>
	<range><ge>8.3.0</ge><lt>18.11.6</lt></range>
</package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>Gitlab reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://docs.gitlab.com/releases/patches/patch-release-gitlab-19-1-1-released/">
	  <p>Cross-site Scripting issue in Analytics Dashboard impacts GitLab EE</p>
	  <p>Cross-site Scripting issue in Web IDE workbench asset handler impacts GitLab CE/EE</p>
	  <p>Information Disclosure issue in Duo Workflows impacts GitLab EE</p>
	  <p>Authorization Bypass issue in Virtual Registry Cleanup Policy API impacts GitLab EE</p>
	  <p>Improper Authorization issue in Rapid Diffs impacts GitLab CE/EE</p>
	  <p>Incorrect Authorization issue in DAST scanner and site profile management impacts GitLab EE</p>
	  <p>Insufficient Filtering issue in CI/CD API impacts GitLab CE/EE</p>
	  <p>Improper Input Validation issue in Snippets impacts GitLab CE/EE</p>
	  <p>Incorrect Authorization issue in Maven Package Registry impacts GitLab CE/EE</p>
	  <p>Improper Access Control issue in group packages API impacts GitLab CE/EE</p>
	  <p>Improper Access Control issue in Protected Environments API impacts GitLab EE</p>
	  <p>Missing Authorization issue in Security Dashboard impacts GitLab EE</p>
	  <p>Server-Side Request Forgery issue in Repository Mirroring impacts GitLab CE/EE</p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-10086</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-10712</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-12053</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-5309</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-2238</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11379</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-8330</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-1606</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-5952</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-5796</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-0934</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-3176</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-12635</cvename>
      <url>https://docs.gitlab.com/releases/patches/patch-release-gitlab-19-1-1-released/</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-06-24</discovery>
      <entry>2026-06-26</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="6a472f75-6fdc-11f1-bc26-8447094a420f">
    <topic>go-git -- DoS vulnerability</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
	<name>go-git</name>
	<range><lt>5.11.0</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>The go-git project reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://github.com/go-git/go-git/security/advisories/GHSA-mw99-9chc-xw7r">
	  <p>See link for details.</p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <url>https://github.com/go-git/go-git/security/advisories/GHSA-mw99-9chc-xw7r</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2023-12-24</discovery>
      <entry>2026-06-24</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="71a85f96-6f18-11f1-8569-3c7c3fba4204">
    <topic>ldns -- CWE-346 Origin Validation Error</topic>
    <affects>
    <package>
	<name>ldns</name>
	<range><ge>1.2.0</ge><lt>1.9.1</lt></range>
    </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p><a href="https://www.nlnetlabs.nl/downloads/ldns/CVE-2026-10846.txt">https://www.nlnetlabs.nl/downloads/ldns/CVE-2026-10846.txt</a> reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://www.nlnetlabs.nl/downloads/ldns/CVE-2026-10846.txt">
	  <p>NLnet Labs ldns 1.2.0 up to and including versions 1.9.0, when used
in applications as (stub) resolver over UDP, lacks matching the
query destination address and port with the response source address
and port.  Furthermore not the query ID, neither the question of
the query is matched with that of the response.  This makes
applications, that use ldns for (stub) resolver functionality over
UDP, vulnerable for off-path poisoning attacks.  The drill tool,
which is shipped with ldns, suffers from this vulnerability.</p>
<p>We would like to thank Pablo Ruiz from <a href="https://www.codecome.ai/">codecome.ai</a> for finding and reporting
this vulnerability.</p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-10846</cvename>
      <url>https://cveawg.mitre.org/api/cve/CVE-2026-10846</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-06-10</discovery>
      <entry>2026-06-23</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="fe2e8bdc-ff48-4166-b285-59822c7cf473">
    <topic>podman -- files outside build context may be included via malicious Git repo or tar archive</topic>
    <affects>
	<package>
	<name>podman</name>
	<range><lt>5.8.3</lt></range>
	</package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>The Podman developers report:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://github.com/podman-container-tools/buildah/security/advisories/GHSA-49p4-px3h-rq49">
	  <p>Building a Dockerfile using an ADD or COPY instruction accessing
	  a malicious Git repository or tar archive could cause files outside
	  the build context directory to be included in the build context or
	  copied into the build.</p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-44517</cvename>
      <url>https://github.com/podman-container-tools/podman/releases/tag/v5.8.3</url>
      <url>https://github.com/podman-container-tools/buildah/security/advisories/GHSA-49p4-px3h-rq49</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-06-22</discovery>
      <entry>2026-06-22</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="46b654f8-6b28-11f1-b8e5-3497f65b111b">
    <topic>nginx -- multiple vulnerabilities</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
       <name>nginx</name>
       <range><lt>1.30.3,3</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
       <p>The nginx developers report:</p>
       <p>
       A heap memory buffer overflow vulnerability when using the
       "ignore_invalid_headers off;" and "large_client_header_buffers"
       directives with large configured values while proxying a specially
       crafted request to an HTTP/2 or gRPC backend may allow memory
       corruption or a segmentation fault in a worker process
       (CVE-2026-42055).
       </p>
       <p>
       A heap memory buffer overread vulnerability while handling a
       specially crafted response with decoding from UTF-8 via the
       "charset_map" directive may allow limited disclosure of worker
       process memory or a segmentation fault in a worker process
       (CVE-2026-48142).
       </p>
      </body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-42055</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-48142</cvename>
      <url>https://nginx.org/en/CHANGES</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-06-17</discovery>
      <entry>2026-06-17</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="08b0c0f6-6a85-11f1-b8e5-3497f65b111b">
   <topic>nginx -- multiple vulnerabilities</topic>
   <affects>
     <package>
       <name>nginx-devel</name>
       <range><lt>1.31.2</lt></range>
     </package>
   </affects>
   <description>
     <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
       <p>The nginx developers report:</p>
       <p>
       A use-after-free vulnerability when using HTTP/3 and processing a
       specially crafted QUIC session may allow memory corruption or a
       segmentation fault in a worker process (CVE-2026-42530).
       </p>
       <p>
       A heap memory buffer overflow vulnerability when using the
       "ignore_invalid_headers off;" and "large_client_header_buffers"
       directives with large configured values while proxying a specially
       crafted request to an HTTP/2 or gRPC backend may allow memory
       corruption or a segmentation fault in a worker process
       (CVE-2026-42055).
       </p>
       <p>
       A heap memory buffer overread vulnerability while handling a
       specially crafted response with decoding from UTF-8 via the
       "charset_map" directive may allow limited disclosure of worker
       process memory or a segmentation fault in a worker process
       (CVE-2026-48142).
       </p>
     </body>
   </description>
   <references>
     <cvename>CVE-2026-42530</cvename>
     <cvename>CVE-2026-42055</cvename>
     <cvename>CVE-2026-48142</cvename>
     <url>https://nginx.org/en/CHANGES</url>
   </references>
   <dates>
     <discovery>2026-06-17</discovery>
     <entry>2026-06-17</entry>
   </dates>
 </vuln>

  <vuln vid="35598415-56de-4562-959c-11fb1fd2d995">
    <topic>jenkins -- multiple vulnerabilities</topic>
    <affects>
    <package>
	<name>jenkins</name>
	<range><lt>2.568</lt></range>
    </package>
    <package>
	<name>jenkins-lts</name>
	<range><lt>2.555.3</lt></range>
    </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>Jenkins Security Advisory 2026-06-10:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://www.jenkins.io/security/advisory/2026-06-10/">
	  <ul>
	    <li>SECURITY-3707 / CVE-2026-53435: Deserialization vulnerability
	    (High)</li>
	    <li>SECURITY-3711+3755 / CVE-2026-53436, CVE-2026-53437: Open
	    redirect vulnerability (Medium)</li>
	    <li>SECURITY-3712 / CVE-2026-53438: Missing permission check allows
	    canceling queue items (Medium)</li>
	    <li>SECURITY-3713 / CVE-2026-53439: Missing permission checks allow
	    obtaining limited user profile information (Medium)</li>
	    <li>SECURITY-3721 / CVE-2026-53440: Open redirect vulnerability in
	    "Delegate to servlet container" security realm (Medium)</li>
	    <li>SECURITY-3731 / CVE-2026-53441: Stored XSS vulnerability in
	    node offline cause description (High)</li>
	    <li>SECURITY-3744 / CVE-2026-53442: Plaintext secrets persisted and
	    served by config.xml endpoints (Medium)</li>
	  </ul>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-53435</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-53436</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-53437</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-53438</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-53439</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-53440</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-53441</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-53442</cvename>
      <url>https://www.jenkins.io/security/advisory/2026-06-10/</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-06-10</discovery>
      <entry>2026-06-17</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="ab152ccb-6a59-11f1-bf61-3c7c3fba4204">
    <topic>Routinator -- CWE-755 Improper Handling of Exceptional Conditions</topic>
    <affects>
    <package>
	<name>routinator</name>
	<range><lt>0.15.2</lt></range>
    </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p><a href="https://www.nlnetlabs.nl/downloads/routinator/CVE-2026-49235.txt">https://www.nlnetlabs.nl/downloads/routinator/CVE-2026-49235.txt</a> reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://www.nlnetlabs.nl/downloads/routinator/CVE-2026-49235.txt">
	  <p>When Routinator encounters a file via RRDP using a specifically
crafted Document Type Definition, Routinator crashes.</p>
<p>Thanks to <a href="https://www.x41-dsec.de/">X41 D-Sec GmbH</a> for reporting the vulnerability.</p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-49235</cvename>
      <url>https://cveawg.mitre.org/api/cve/CVE-2026-49235</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-06-08</discovery>
      <entry>2026-06-17</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="40edfb37-6a59-11f1-bf61-3c7c3fba4204">
    <topic>Routinator -- CWE-20 Improper Input Validation</topic>
    <affects>
    <package>
	<name>routinator</name>
	<range><lt>0.15.2</lt></range>
    </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p><a href="https://www.nlnetlabs.nl/downloads/routinator/CVE-2026-49234.txt">https://www.nlnetlabs.nl/downloads/routinator/CVE-2026-49234.txt</a> reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://www.nlnetlabs.nl/downloads/routinator/CVE-2026-49234.txt">
	  <p>When sending a specifically crafted non-UTF-8 string as select-asn
query parameter to the /api/v1/origins endpoint, Routinator crashes.

This only affects users who allow API access from untrusted networks.</p>
<p>Thanks to <a href="https://www.x41-dsec.de/">X41 D-Sec GmbH</a> for reporting the vulnerability.</p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-49234</cvename>
      <url>https://cveawg.mitre.org/api/cve/CVE-2026-49234</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-06-08</discovery>
      <entry>2026-06-17</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="e7be3859-6a58-11f1-bf61-3c7c3fba4204">
    <topic>Routinator -- CWE-22 Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal')</topic>
    <affects>
    <package>
	<name>routinator</name>
	<range><lt>0.15.2</lt></range>
    </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p><a href="https://www.nlnetlabs.nl/downloads/routinator/CVE-2026-49233.txt">https://www.nlnetlabs.nl/downloads/routinator/CVE-2026-49233.txt</a> reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://www.nlnetlabs.nl/downloads/routinator/CVE-2026-49233.txt">
	  <p>Routinator does not properly check the module component of rsync
URIs, which are used to create the file system paths for the
Routinator cache.  This allows for path traversal by having a module
name containing .., potentially providing an attacker access to the
entire Routinator rsync cache.</p>
<p>Thanks to <a href="https://www.x41-dsec.de/">X41 D-Sec GmbH</a> for reporting the vulnerability.</p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-49233</cvename>
      <url>https://cveawg.mitre.org/api/cve/CVE-2026-49233</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-06-08</discovery>
      <entry>2026-06-17</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="b1c6c691-6a57-11f1-bf61-3c7c3fba4204">
    <topic>Routinator -- CWE-755 Improper Handling of Exceptional Conditions</topic>
    <affects>
    <package>
	<name>routinator</name>
	<range><lt>0.15.2</lt></range>
    </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p><a href="https://www.nlnetlabs.nl/downloads/routinator/CVE-2026-49232.txt">https://www.nlnetlabs.nl/downloads/routinator/CVE-2026-49232.txt</a> reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://www.nlnetlabs.nl/downloads/routinator/CVE-2026-49232.txt">
	  <p>Routinator exits on any error when accepting incoming HTTP or RTR
connections, including ones it can recover from such as running out
of file descriptors.  This condition can be triggered maliciously
by an attacker by opening a large number of connections to the HTTP
or RTR server.

This only affects users that make their HTTP or RTR server available
to untrusted networks.</p>
<p>Thanks to <a href="https://www.x41-dsec.de/">X41 D-Sec GmbH</a> for reporting the vulnerability.</p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-49232</cvename>
      <url>https://cveawg.mitre.org/api/cve/CVE-2026-49232</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-06-08</discovery>
      <entry>2026-06-17</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="cffe1232-e4b3-4c72-8b4c-6a8298c9b289">
    <topic>chromium -- security fixes</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
       <name>chromium</name>
       <range><lt>149.0.7827.155</lt></range>
      </package>
      <package>
       <name>ungoogled-chromium</name>
       <range><lt>149.0.7827.155</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
       <p>Chrome Releases reports:</p>
       <blockquote cite="https://chromereleases.googleblog.com/2026/06/stable-channel-update-for-desktop_01750511403.html">
	 <p>This update includes 33 security fixes:</p>
	 <ul>
	    <li>[516496659] Critical CVE-2026-12437: Use after free in WebShare.</li>
	    <li>[516947912] Critical CVE-2026-12438: Inappropriate implementation in WebView.</li>
	    <li>[519728275] Critical CVE-2026-12439: Use after free in Digital Credentials.</li>
	    <li>[519731619] Critical CVE-2026-12440: Use after free in DigitalCredentials.</li>
	    <li>[520157118] Critical CVE-2026-12441: Use after free in File Input.</li>
	    <li>[521950423] Critical CVE-2026-12442: Use after free in Passwords.</li>
	    <li>[522566295] Critical CVE-2026-12443: Use after free in Web Authentication.</li>
	    <li>[513160088] High CVE-2026-12444: Out of bounds read in Chromoting.</li>
	    <li>[513199795] High CVE-2026-12445: Use after free in Extensions.</li>
	    <li>[513313107] High CVE-2026-12446: Insufficient data validation in Passwords.</li>
	    <li>[513405023] High CVE-2026-12447: Heap buffer overflow in WebRTC.</li>
	    <li>[513458233] High CVE-2026-12448: Inappropriate implementation in WebView.</li>
	    <li>[513480539] High CVE-2026-12449: Use after free in Chromoting.</li>
	    <li>[514531776] High CVE-2026-12450: Inappropriate implementation in Media.</li>
	    <li>[514741076] High CVE-2026-12451: Use after free in DigitalCredentials.</li>
	    <li>[515462244] High CVE-2026-12452: Use after free in Downloads.</li>
	    <li>[516448843] High CVE-2026-12453: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Input.</li>
	    <li>[516926968] High CVE-2026-12454: Race in Safe Browsing.</li>
	    <li>[517069848] High CVE-2026-12455: Use after free in Tab Strip.</li>
	    <li>[517124587] High CVE-2026-12456: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Extensions.</li>
	    <li>[517153117] High CVE-2026-12457: Insufficient data validation in Extensions.</li>
	    <li>[517258337] High CVE-2026-12458: Incorrect security UI in Passwords.</li>
	    <li>[517406035] High CVE-2026-12459: Inappropriate implementation in Serial.</li>
	    <li>[517484284] High CVE-2026-12460: Insufficient policy enforcement in File System Access.</li>
	    <li>[517727318] High CVE-2026-12461: Out of bounds read in WebRTC.</li>
	    <li>[517916024] High CVE-2026-12462: Use after free in Media.</li>
	    <li>[518042749] High CVE-2026-12463: Inappropriate implementation in Views.</li>
	    <li>[519358344] High CVE-2026-12464: Use after free in Browser.</li>
	    <li>[520189702] High CVE-2026-12465: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Metrics.</li>
	    <li>[520199394] High CVE-2026-12466: Heap buffer overflow in WebRTC.</li>
	    <li>[520202726] High CVE-2026-12467: Use after free in Extensions.</li>
	    <li>[521485244] High CVE-2026-12468: Inappropriate implementation in Updater.</li>
	    <li>[521618871] High CVE-2026-12469: Uninitialized Use in GPU.</li>
	 </ul>
       </blockquote>
      </body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-12437</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-12438</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-12439</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-12440</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-12441</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-12442</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-12443</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-12444</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-12445</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-12446</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-12447</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-12448</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-12449</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-12450</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-12451</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-12452</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-12453</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-12454</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-12455</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-12456</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-12457</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-12458</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-12459</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-12460</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-12461</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-12462</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-12463</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-12464</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-12465</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-12466</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-12467</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-12468</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-12469</cvename>
      <url>https://chromereleases.googleblog.com/2026/06/stable-channel-update-for-desktop_01750511403.html</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-06-11</discovery>
      <entry>2026-06-15</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="44afeb08-6a18-11f1-9647-10ffe07f9334">
    <topic>mail/mailpit -- Incomplete SSRF protection in Link Check API via uncovered IPv6 forms</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
	<name>mailpit</name>
	<range><lt>1.30.2</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>Mailpit authorreports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://github.com/axllent/mailpit/security/advisories/GHSA-w4mc-hhc6-xp28">
	  <p>The tools.IsInternalIP deny-list relies on Go's stdlib
	  classification helpers (IsLoopback, IsPrivate,
	  IsLinkLocalUnicast, IsLinkLocalMulticast, IsUnspecified,
	  IsMulticast) plus an inline CGNAT range, but those helpers
	  do not match two classes of IPv6 address that should be
	  blocked for SSRF purposes</p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-55187</cvename>
      <url>https://github.com/axllent/mailpit/security/advisories/GHSA-w4mc-hhc6-xp28</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-06-17</discovery>
      <entry>2026-06-17</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="1466c84c-68b1-11f1-8de5-a8a1599412c6">
    <topic>chromium -- security fixes</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
       <name>chromium</name>
       <range><lt>149.0.7827.114</lt></range>
      </package>
      <package>
       <name>ungoogled-chromium</name>
       <range><lt>149.0.7827.114</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
       <p>Chrome Releases reports:</p>
       <blockquote cite="https://chromereleases.googleblog.com/2026/06/stable-channel-update-for-desktop_01962725236.html">
	 <p>This update includes 28 security fixes:</p>
	 <ul>
	    <li>[516731749] Critical CVE-2026-12007: Use after free  Core. Reported by Google on 2026-05-26</li>
	    <li>[516942828] Critical CVE-2026-12008: Use after free  DigitalCredentials. Reported by Google on 2026-05-27</li>
	    <li>[517332006] Critical CVE-2026-12009: Insufficient validation of untrusted input  ccessibility. Reported by Google on 2026-05-28</li>
	    <li>[517531647] Critical CVE-2026-12010: Heap buffer overflow  GPU. Reported by Google on 2026-05-28</li>
	    <li>[518108291] Critical CVE-2026-12011: Use after free  WebMIDI. Reported by Google on 2026-05-30</li>
	    <li>[499182801] High CVE-2026-12012: Use after free  etwork. Reported by Google on 2026-04-03</li>
	    <li>[514229805] High CVE-2026-12013: Use after free  Media. Reported by Henock Habte, Independent Security Researcher on 2026-05-18</li>
	    <li>[514742747] High CVE-2026-12014: Use after free  Cast. Reported by Google on 2026-05-19</li>
	    <li>[515463295] High CVE-2026-12015: Use after free  utofill. Reported by Google on 2026-05-21</li>
	    <li>[516482138] High CVE-2026-12016: Insufficient validation of untrusted input  DevTools. Reported by Google on 2026-05-25</li>
	    <li>[516797143] High CVE-2026-12017: Insufficient validation of untrusted input  Extensions. Reported by Google on 2026-05-26</li>
	    <li>[516808201] High CVE-2026-12018: Inappropriate implementation  Mojo. Reported by Google on 2026-05-26</li>
	    <li>[516872067] High CVE-2026-12019: Out of bounds write  Codecs. Reported by Google on 2026-05-26</li>
	    <li>[516907083] High CVE-2026-12020: Use after free  utofill. Reported by Google on 2026-05-27</li>
	    <li>[516929496] High CVE-2026-12022: Race  Safe Browsing. Reported by Google on 2026-05-27</li>
	    <li>[517018374] High CVE-2026-12023: Use after free  GPU. Reported by Google on 2026-05-27</li>
	    <li>[517086161] High CVE-2026-12024: Insufficient policy enforcement  DevTools. Reported by Google on 2026-05-27</li>
	    <li>[517153191] High CVE-2026-12025: Insufficient validation of untrusted input  etwork. Reported by Google on 2026-05-27</li>
	    <li>[517347084] High CVE-2026-12026: Out of bounds read  Video. Reported by Google on 2026-05-28</li>
	    <li>[517517155] High CVE-2026-12027: Insufficient policy enforcement  Headless. Reported by Google on 2026-05-28</li>
	    <li>[517555461] High CVE-2026-12028: Use after free  GPU. Reported by Google on 2026-05-28</li>
	    <li>[518002958] High CVE-2026-12029: Use after free  Video. Reported by Google on 2026-05-29</li>
	    <li>[518007423] High CVE-2026-12030: Heap buffer overflow  GPU. Reported by Google on 2026-05-29</li>
	    <li>[518045638] High CVE-2026-12031: Inappropriate implementation  Views. Reported by Google on 2026-05-30</li>
	    <li>[518128953] High CVE-2026-12032: Inappropriate implementation  Passwords. Reported by Google on 2026-05-30</li>
	    <li>[519248779] High CVE-2026-12033: Out of bounds read  VideoCapture. Reported by Google on 2026-06-02</li>
	    <li>[519258799] High CVE-2026-12034: Insufficient validation of untrusted input  Linux Toolkit Theming. Reported by Google on 2026-06-02</li>
	    <li>[520210566] High CVE-2026-12035: Use after free  Views. Reported by Google on 2026-06-05</li>
	 </ul>
       </blockquote>
      </body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-12007</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-12008</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-12009</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-12010</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-12011</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-12012</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-12013</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-12014</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-12015</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-12016</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-12017</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-12018</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-12019</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-12020</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-12022</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-12023</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-12024</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-12025</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-12026</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-12027</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-12028</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-12029</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-12030</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-12031</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-12032</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-12033</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-12034</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-12035</cvename>
      <url>https://chromereleases.googleblog.com/2026/06/stable-channel-update-for-desktop_01962725236.html</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-06-11</discovery>
      <entry>2026-06-15</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="76b09b16-638b-11f1-8e16-901b0e13f1a0">
    <topic>libsmi -- Buffer overflow in the smiGetNode function in lib/smi</topic>
    <affects>
    <package>
	<name>libsmi</name>
	<range><ge>0.4.8</ge><lt>0.4.8_3</lt></range>
    </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2011-01/msg00003.html reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2011-01/msg00003.html">
	  <p>Buffer overflow in the smiGetNode function in lib/smi.c in libsmi
	    0.4.8 allows context-dependent attackers to execute arbitrary code
	    via an Object Identifier (aka OID) represented as a numerical string
	    containing many components separated by .  (dot) characters.</p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2010-2891</cvename>
      <url>https://cveawg.mitre.org/api/cve/CVE-2010-2891</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2010-10-27</discovery>
      <entry>2026-06-14</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="57e69b2c-67b2-11f1-b3b6-5404a68ad561">
    <topic>traefik -- Multiple vulnerabilities</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
      <name>traefik</name>
      <range><lt>3.7.3</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
      <p>The traefik project releases a new version addressing multiple CVEs:</p>
      <blockquote cite="https://github.com/traefik/traefik/releases/tag/v3.7.3">
      <ul>
      <li>CVE-2026-48020 (StripPrefix Route-Level Auth Bypass)</li>
      <li>CVE-2026-48491 (SNICheck ignores wildcard TLSOptions mappings, allowing domain-fronted mTLS bypass)</li>
      <li>HTTP/3 mTLS bypass via exact SNI TLSOptions lookup for wildcard and mixed-case hosts</li>
      </ul>
    </blockquote>
    </body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-48020</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-48491</cvename>
      <url>https://github.com/traefik/traefik/releases/tag/v3.7.3</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-06-04</discovery>
      <entry>2026-06-14</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="94f93681-6775-11f1-8044-002590af0794">
    <topic>caddy -- multiple vulnerabilities</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
      <name>caddy</name>
      <range><lt>2.11.4</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
      <p>Caddy project reports:</p>
      <blockquote cite="https://github.com/caddyserver/caddy/releases/tag/v2.11.4">
      <p>Caddy 2.11.4 contains multiple security fixes.</p>
      </blockquote>
      <p>GitHub Security Advisory GHSA-qrp7-cvwr-j2c6 reports:</p>
      <blockquote cite="https://github.com/caddyserver/caddy/security/advisories/GHSA-qrp7-cvwr-j2c6">
      <p>Windows-encoded backslashes in request paths could bypass
      path-scoped authorization rules before files are served by
      <code>file_server</code>.</p>
      </blockquote>
      <p>GitHub Security Advisory GHSA-f59h-q822-g45g reports:</p>
      <blockquote cite="https://github.com/caddyserver/caddy/security/advisories/GHSA-f59h-q822-g45g">
      <p><code>forward_auth copy_headers</code> could fail to remove
      underscore aliases of copied identity headers before FastCGI header
      normalization, allowing identity or group header spoofing.</p>
      </blockquote>
      <p>GitHub Security Advisory GHSA-vcc4-2c75-vc9v reports:</p>
      <blockquote cite="https://github.com/caddyserver/caddy/security/advisories/GHSA-vcc4-2c75-vc9v">
      <p>The <code>stripHTML</code> template function could fail to remove
      malformed HTML, potentially allowing client-side cross-site
      scripting if untrusted output is later rendered as HTML.</p>
      </blockquote>
      </body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-52844</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-52845</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-52846</cvename>
      <url>https://github.com/caddyserver/caddy/releases/tag/v2.11.4</url>
      <url>https://github.com/caddyserver/caddy/security/advisories/GHSA-qrp7-cvwr-j2c6</url>
      <url>https://github.com/caddyserver/caddy/security/advisories/GHSA-f59h-q822-g45g</url>
      <url>https://github.com/caddyserver/caddy/security/advisories/GHSA-vcc4-2c75-vc9v</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-06-08</discovery>
      <entry>2026-06-13</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="ac9bab80-6618-11f1-8e04-2cf05da270f3">
    <topic>Gitlab -- vulnerabilities</topic>
    <affects>
<package>
	<name>gitlab-ce</name>
	<name>gitlab-ee</name>
	<range><ge>19.0.0</ge><lt>19.0.2</lt></range>
	<range><ge>18.11.0</ge><lt>18.11.5</lt></range>
	<range><ge>12.0.0</ge><lt>18.10.8</lt></range>
</package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>Gitlab reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://docs.gitlab.com/releases/patches/patch-release-gitlab-19-0-2-released/">
	  <p>Improper Access Control issue in Group SAML Identity API impacts GitLab EE</p>
	  <p>Cross-site Scripting issue in Analytics Dashboard impacts GitLab EE</p>
	  <p>Denial of Service issue in Grape API JSON parsing middleware impacts GitLab CE/EE</p>
	  <p>HTML injection issue in certain group setting fields impacts GitLab EE</p>
	  <p>Denial of Service issue in Group Placeholder Reassignments API impacts GitLab CE/EE</p>
	  <p>Improper Access Control issue in Merge Requests API impacts GitLab CE/EE</p>
	  <p>Server-Side Request Forgery issue in Gitaly repository import impacts GitLab CE/EE</p>
	  <p>HTML injection issue in CI/CD Catalog impacts GitLab CE/EE</p>
	  <p>Improper Access Control issue in Security Inventory impacts GitLab EE</p>
	  <p>Authorization Bypass issue in Merge Request diff impacts GitLab CE/EE</p>
	  <p>Improper Access Control issue in Todos API impacts GitLab CE/EE</p>
	  <p>Improper Neutralization issue in Service Desk email template impacts GitLab CE/EE</p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-6552</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-10087</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-7250</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-8589</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-1500</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-6269</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-9204</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-10733</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-6277</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-6976</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-3553</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-9694</cvename>
      <url>https://docs.gitlab.com/releases/patches/patch-release-gitlab-19-0-2-released/</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-06-11</discovery>
      <entry>2026-06-12</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="644d5e6c-1bd9-4904-8440-16c04100a2e1">
    <topic>h2o -- stack overflow serving static files on musl libc</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
	<name>h2o</name>
	<range><lt>20260609</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>h2o project reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://github.com/h2o/h2o/security/advisories/GHSA-rf9v-m59p-mq84">
	  <p>When serving static files, h2o can allocate a file path on
	    the stack using alloca.  On systems using musl libc, a large
	    allocation can exceed the default pthread stack size and crash
	    the server, causing a denial of service.</p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-44453</cvename>
      <url>https://github.com/h2o/h2o/security/advisories/GHSA-rf9v-m59p-mq84</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-05-29</discovery>
      <entry>2026-06-11</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="fba766f4-ccda-4e1b-8875-ab857c6a6532">
    <topic>h2o -- heap overrun parsing zero-length SNI</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
	<name>h2o</name>
	<range><lt>20260609</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>h2o project reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://github.com/h2o/h2o/security/advisories/GHSA-w68q-rqwx-7wvq">
	  <p>When h2o receives a TLS or QUIC ClientHello containing a
	    zero-length SNI extension, it can overrun the zero-length
	    hostname while copying it.  This can trigger a segmentation
	    fault and cause a denial of service.</p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-44452</cvename>
      <url>https://github.com/h2o/h2o/security/advisories/GHSA-w68q-rqwx-7wvq</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-05-29</discovery>
      <entry>2026-06-11</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="35c57495-2231-4733-a66e-044f3dad8b21">
    <topic>h2o -- HTTP/2 state amplification denial of service</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
	<name>h2o</name>
	<range><lt>20260609</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>h2o project reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://github.com/h2o/h2o/security/advisories/GHSA-qcrr-wrhc-pgq9">
	  <p>An HTTP/2 attack can combine HPACK decompression state
	    amplification with stalled streams.  Depending on server
	    configuration, decoded header state can be retained by stalled
	    streams, causing excessive memory use and denial of service.</p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <url>https://github.com/h2o/h2o/security/advisories/GHSA-qcrr-wrhc-pgq9</url>
      <url>https://blog.calif.io/p/codex-discovered-a-hidden-http2-bomb</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-06-04</discovery>
      <entry>2026-06-11</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="d87db2a1-64d4-11f1-ab11-4c526214c986">
    <topic>Erlang/OTP -- buffer overflow parsing SCTP ERROR/ABORT chunks</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
	<name>erlang-runtime27</name>
	<range><lt>27.3.4.13</lt></range>
      </package>
      <package>
	<name>erlang-runtime28</name>
	<range><lt>28.5.0.2</lt></range>
      </package>
      <package>
	<name>erlang-runtime29</name>
	<range><lt>29.0.2</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>https://github.com/erlang/otp/security/advisories/GHSA-6f4f-chj5-5g97 reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://github.com/erlang/otp/security/advisories/GHSA-6f4f-chj5-5g97">
	  <p>A buffer overflow error when parsing SCTP ERROR or ABORT
	  chunks has been fixed. This could lead to stack corruption and
	  VM crash, but ultimately with hard work by an attacker be
	  refined into maybe even remote code execution.</p>
	</blockquote>
      </body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-49759</cvename>
      <url>https://github.com/erlang/otp/security/advisories/GHSA-6f4f-chj5-5g97</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-06-10</discovery>
      <entry>2026-06-10</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="d87de755-64d4-11f1-ab11-4c526214c986">
    <topic>Erlang/OTP -- stack overflow in ei_s_print_term for very large integer terms</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
	<name>erlang-runtime27</name>
	<range><lt>27.3.4.13</lt></range>
      </package>
      <package>
	<name>erlang-runtime28</name>
	<range><lt>28.5.0.2</lt></range>
      </package>
      <package>
	<name>erlang-runtime29</name>
	<range><lt>29.0.2</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>https://github.com/erlang/otp/security/advisories/GHSA-xcxj-5pg2-v72j reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://github.com/erlang/otp/security/advisories/GHSA-xcxj-5pg2-v72j">
	  <p>Fixed a stack overflow in ei_s_print_term in erl_interface
	  for very large integer terms (more than 2000 hexadecimal digits
	  long).</p>
	</blockquote>
      </body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-49760</cvename>
      <url>https://github.com/erlang/otp/security/advisories/GHSA-xcxj-5pg2-v72j</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-06-10</discovery>
      <entry>2026-06-10</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="d87e0681-64d4-11f1-ab11-4c526214c986">
    <topic>Erlang/OTP -- FTP passive-mode client does not validate server response IP</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
	<name>erlang-runtime27</name>
	<range><lt>27.3.4.13</lt></range>
      </package>
      <package>
	<name>erlang-runtime28</name>
	<range><lt>28.5.0.2</lt></range>
      </package>
      <package>
	<name>erlang-runtime29</name>
	<range><lt>29.0.2</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>https://github.com/erlang/otp/security/advisories/GHSA-24cv-hwgr-37fq reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://github.com/erlang/otp/security/advisories/GHSA-24cv-hwgr-37fq">
	  <p>The FTP client in passive mode did not validate the IP
	  address returned in the server's response, allowing a
	  compromised or malicious server to redirect the data connection
	  to an arbitrary host. This enables server-side request forgery
	  (SSRF) and FTP bounce attacks.</p>
	</blockquote>
      </body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-48858</cvename>
      <url>https://github.com/erlang/otp/security/advisories/GHSA-24cv-hwgr-37fq</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-06-10</discovery>
      <entry>2026-06-10</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="d87e2466-64d4-11f1-ab11-4c526214c986">
    <topic>Erlang/OTP -- httpc leaks authentication headers on cross-host redirect</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
	<name>erlang-runtime27</name>
	<range><lt>27.3.4.13</lt></range>
      </package>
      <package>
	<name>erlang-runtime28</name>
	<range><lt>28.5.0.2</lt></range>
      </package>
      <package>
	<name>erlang-runtime29</name>
	<range><lt>29.0.2</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>https://github.com/erlang/otp/security/advisories/GHSA-m75x-4vwg-ggjh reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://github.com/erlang/otp/security/advisories/GHSA-m75x-4vwg-ggjh">
	  <p>The HTTP client (httpc) in inets now removes Authorization,
	  Proxy-Authorization, Cookie, Referer, and Origin headers when
	  following a redirect to a different host or port, following the
	  requirements of RFC 9110 section 15.4. Previously these headers
	  were forwarded verbatim, potentially leaking credentials to
	  unintended targets.</p>
	</blockquote>
      </body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-48856</cvename>
      <url>https://github.com/erlang/otp/security/advisories/GHSA-m75x-4vwg-ggjh</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-06-10</discovery>
      <entry>2026-06-10</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="d87e41a4-64d4-11f1-ab11-4c526214c986">
    <topic>Erlang/OTP -- SFTP READLINK discloses server filesystem paths</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
	<name>erlang-runtime27</name>
	<range><lt>27.3.4.13</lt></range>
      </package>
      <package>
	<name>erlang-runtime28</name>
	<range><lt>28.5.0.2</lt></range>
      </package>
      <package>
	<name>erlang-runtime29</name>
	<range><lt>29.0.2</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>https://github.com/erlang/otp/security/advisories/GHSA-pv7g-pjrq-x2fh reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://github.com/erlang/otp/security/advisories/GHSA-pv7g-pjrq-x2fh">
	  <p>The SSH SFTP daemon's handling of SSH_FXP_READLINK returned
	  symbolic link targets containing the server's absolute
	  filesystem path, disclosing the backend root prefix to clients.
	  The handler now strips the backend root prefix from symlink
	  targets before returning them.</p>
	</blockquote>
      </body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-48855</cvename>
      <url>https://github.com/erlang/otp/security/advisories/GHSA-pv7g-pjrq-x2fh</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-06-10</discovery>
      <entry>2026-06-10</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="d87e5fb4-64d4-11f1-ab11-4c526214c986">
    <topic>Erlang/OTP -- TLS distribution check_ip flag does not enforce same-LAN constraint</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
	<name>erlang-runtime27</name>
	<range><lt>27.3.4.13</lt></range>
      </package>
      <package>
	<name>erlang-runtime28</name>
	<range><lt>28.5.0.2</lt></range>
      </package>
      <package>
	<name>erlang-runtime29</name>
	<range><lt>29.0.2</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>https://github.com/erlang/otp/security/advisories/GHSA-gp7x-mfv6-52cv reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://github.com/erlang/otp/security/advisories/GHSA-gp7x-mfv6-52cv">
	  <p>Erlang distribution over TLS run with the kernel check_ip
	  flag now properly enforces connecting nodes to be on the same
	  LAN. Previously the constraint was not enforced.</p>
	</blockquote>
      </body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-48860</cvename>
      <url>https://github.com/erlang/otp/security/advisories/GHSA-gp7x-mfv6-52cv</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-06-10</discovery>
      <entry>2026-06-10</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="d87e7df5-64d4-11f1-ab11-4c526214c986">
    <topic>Erlang/OTP -- timing-based username enumeration in SSH password authentication</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
	<name>erlang-runtime29</name>
	<range><lt>29.0.2</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>https://github.com/erlang/otp/security/advisories/GHSA-3w6p-vwhf-wvp4 reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://github.com/erlang/otp/security/advisories/GHSA-3w6p-vwhf-wvp4">
	  <p>A timing-based username enumeration vulnerability during
	  password authentication with the user_passwords option has been
	  fixed by performing a dummy PBKDF2 computation for invalid
	  usernames, so authentication timing no longer reveals whether a
	  username exists.</p>
	</blockquote>
      </body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-48859</cvename>
      <url>https://github.com/erlang/otp/security/advisories/GHSA-3w6p-vwhf-wvp4</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-06-10</discovery>
      <entry>2026-06-10</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="7ce71561-64c7-11f1-99fc-40b034429ecf">
    <topic>p5-ack -- Multiple issues</topic>
    <affects>
<package>
<name>p5-ack</name>
<range><lt>3.10.0</lt></range>
</package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>Ack project reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://metacpan.org/dist/ack/changes">
	  <p>CVE-2026-49147: filename ANSI escape sequences</p>
	  <p>CVE-2026-49146: project .ackrc -A -B -C memory exhaustion</p>
	  <p>CVE-2026-49145: project .ackrc --follow / --files-from file exfiltration</p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-49147</cvename>
      <url>https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-49147.html</url>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-49146</cvename>
      <url>https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-49146.html</url>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-49145</cvename>
      <url>https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-49145.html</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-06-07</discovery>
      <entry>2026-06-10</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="36ec75da-633d-11f1-9dbc-28d2443e6cfa">
    <topic>tree-sitter-cli -- Always-Incorrect Control Flow Implementation in wasmtime crate</topic>
    <affects>
    <package>
	<name>tree-sitter-cli</name>
	<range><lt>0.26.9</lt></range>
    </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>https://github.com/bytecodealliance/wasmtime/security/advisories/GHSA-q49f-xg75-m9xw reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://github.com/bytecodealliance/wasmtime/security/advisories/GHSA-q49f-xg75-m9xw">
	  <p>Wasmtime is a runtime for WebAssembly.  From 25.0.0 to before 36.0.7,
42.0.2, and 43.0.1, Wasmtime's Winch compiler contains a vulnerability
where the compilation of the table.fill instruction can result in
a host panic.  This means that a valid guest can be compiled with
Winch, on any architecture, and cause the host to panic.  This
represents a denial-of-service vulnerability in Wasmtime due to
guests being able to trigger a panic.  The specific issue is that
a historical refactoring changed how compiled code referenced tables
within the table.* instructions.  This refactoring forgot to update
the Winch code paths associated as well, meaning that Winch was
using the wrong indexing scheme.  Due to the feature support of
Winch the only problem that can result is tables being mixed up or
nonexistent tables being used, meaning that the guest is limited
to panicking the host (using a nonexistent table), or executing
spec-incorrect behavior and modifying the wrong table. This
vulnerability is fixed in crate versions: 36.0.7, 42.0.2, and 43.0.1.</p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <url>https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0089</url>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-34946</cvename>
      <url>https://cveawg.mitre.org/api/cve/CVE-2026-34946</url>
      <url>https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-q49f-xg75-m9xw</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-04-09</discovery>
      <entry>2026-06-08</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="259b562f-64ab-11f1-8607-8447094a420f">
    <topic>OpenSSL -- Multiple vulnerabilities</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
	<name>openssl</name>
	<range><lt>3.0.21,1</lt></range>
      </package>
      <package>
	<name>openssl34</name>
	<range><lt>3.4.6</lt></range>
      </package>
      <package>
	<name>openssl35</name>
	<range><lt>3.5.7</lt></range>
      </package>
      <package>
	<name>openssl36</name>
	<range><lt>3.6.3</lt></range>
      </package>
      <package>
	<name>openssl40</name>
	<range><lt>4.0.1</lt></range>
      </package>
      <package>
	<name>openssl111</name>
	<range><lt>1.1.1zh</lt></range>
      </package>
      <package>
	<name>FreeBSD</name>
	<range><ge>15.0</ge><lt>15.0_10</lt></range>
	<range><ge>14.4</ge><lt>14.4_6</lt></range>
	<range><ge>14.3</ge><lt>14.3_15</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>The OpenSSL project reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://openssl-library.org/news/secadv/20260609.txt">
	  <p>Eighteen vulnerabilities in OpenSSL library.
	    Highest classification High.</p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-45447</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-34182</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-34183</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-35188</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-42764</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-45445</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-7383</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-9076</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-34180</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-34181</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-42765</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-42766</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-42767</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-42768</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-42769</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-42770</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-42771</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-45446</cvename>
      <url>https://openssl-library.org/news/secadv/20260609.txt</url>
      <freebsdsa>SA-26:35.openssl</freebsdsa>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-06-09</discovery>
      <entry>2026-06-10</entry>
      <modified>2026-08-26</modified>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="efa1873c-64a0-11f1-b189-a8a1599412c6">
    <topic>chromium -- security fixes</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
       <name>chromium</name>
       <range><lt>149.0.7827.102</lt></range>
      </package>
      <package>
       <name>ungoogled-chromium</name>
       <range><lt>149.0.7827.102</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
       <p>Chrome Releases reports:</p>
       <blockquote cite="https://chromereleases.googleblog.com/2026/06/stable-channel-update-for-desktop_0153744567.html">
	 <p>This update includes 74 security fixes:</p>
	 <ul>
	    <li>[516501794] Critical CVE-2026-11628: Use after free in Ozone.</li>
	    <li>[516674532] Critical CVE-2026-11629: Use after free in Ozone.</li>
	    <li>[516677924] Critical CVE-2026-11630: Use after free in File Input.</li>
	    <li>[516691130] Critical CVE-2026-11631: Use after free in Aura.</li>
	    <li>[516707881] Critical CVE-2026-11632: Use after free in TabStrip.</li>
	    <li>[516963272] Critical CVE-2026-11633: Use after free in Bluetooth.</li>
	    <li>[516975148] Critical CVE-2026-11634: Use after free in Gamepad.</li>
	    <li>[516987814] Critical CVE-2026-11635: Use after free in Bluetooth.</li>
	    <li>[517023053] Critical CVE-2026-11636: Use after free in Autofill.</li>
	    <li>[517040438] Critical CVE-2026-11637: Use after free in Views.</li>
	    <li>[517047197] Critical CVE-2026-11638: Use after free in Printing.</li>
	    <li>[517227707] Critical CVE-2026-11639: Use after free in Compositing.</li>
	    <li>[517339758] Critical CVE-2026-11640: Integer overflow in libyuv.</li>
	    <li>[517418936] Critical CVE-2026-11641: Use after free in Bluetooth.</li>
	    <li>[517678820] Critical CVE-2026-11642: Use after free in Web Apps.</li>
	    <li>[518006379] Critical CVE-2026-11643: Use after free in Proxy.</li>
	    <li>[518043597] Critical CVE-2026-11644: Use after free in Views.</li>
	    <li>[506689381] High CVE-2026-11645: Out of bounds memory access in V8.</li>
	    <li>[517168239] High CVE-2026-11646: Use after free in ViewTransitions.</li>
	    <li>[502156940] High CVE-2026-11647: Use after free in Printing.</li>
	    <li>[506684534] High CVE-2026-11648: Use after free in FullScreen.</li>
	    <li>[511270083] High CVE-2026-11649: Use after free in V8.</li>
	    <li>[511279942] High CVE-2026-11650: Use after free in V8.</li>
	    <li>[511736002] High CVE-2026-11651: Use after free in Network.</li>
	    <li>[513156160] High CVE-2026-11652: Use after free in Extensions.</li>
	    <li>[513321171] High CVE-2026-11653: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Extensions.</li>
	    <li>[513362710] High CVE-2026-11654: Use after free in CameraCapture.</li>
	    <li>[513396305] High CVE-2026-11655: Integer overflow in Media.</li>
	    <li>[513424000] High CVE-2026-11656: Use after free in ServiceWorker.</li>
	    <li>[513465272] High CVE-2026-11657: Use after free in Payments.</li>
	    <li>[513564337] High CVE-2026-11658: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Extensions.</li>
	    <li>[513702971] High CVE-2026-11659: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in UI.</li>
	    <li>[513731890] High CVE-2026-11660: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in New Tab Page.</li>
	    <li>[513748868] High CVE-2026-11661: Use after free in Views.</li>
	    <li>[513773313] High CVE-2026-11662: Type Confusion in Bindings.</li>
	    <li>[513820666] High CVE-2026-11663: Use after free in Skia.</li>
	    <li>[513830374] High CVE-2026-11664: Use after free in Payments.</li>
	    <li>[513948465] High CVE-2026-11665: Out of bounds read in Dawn.</li>
	    <li>[514009323] High CVE-2026-11666: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Input.</li>
	    <li>[514671098] High CVE-2026-11667: Out of bounds read in WebRTC.</li>
	    <li>[515419790] High CVE-2026-11668: Uninitialized Use in Codecs.</li>
	    <li>[515429352] High CVE-2026-11669: Integer overflow in Media.</li>
	    <li>[515469283] High CVE-2026-11670: Use after free in PDF.</li>
	    <li>[516608438] High CVE-2026-11671: Use after free in Navigation.</li>
	    <li>[516794471] High CVE-2026-11672: Out of bounds write in GPU.</li>
	    <li>[516902973] High CVE-2026-11673: Use after free in InterestGroups.</li>
	    <li>[516910450] High CVE-2026-11674: Use after free in Guest View.</li>
	    <li>[516915337] High CVE-2026-11675: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Skia.</li>
	    <li>[516949298] High CVE-2026-11676: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Dawn.</li>
	    <li>[516979551] High CVE-2026-11677: Race in Network.</li>
	    <li>[516986556] High CVE-2026-11678: Integer overflow in libyuv.</li>
	    <li>[516997135] High CVE-2026-11679: Use after free in Codecs.</li>
	    <li>[517004487] High CVE-2026-11680: Use after free in Media.</li>
	    <li>[517050585] High CVE-2026-11681: Use after free in Ozone.</li>
	    <li>[517103584] High CVE-2026-11682: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Views.</li>
	    <li>[517129549] High CVE-2026-11683: Use after free in WebCodecs.</li>
	    <li>[517130229] High CVE-2026-11684: Insufficient policy enforcement in Network.</li>
	    <li>[517183713] High CVE-2026-11685: Insufficient data validation in MediaCapture.</li>
	    <li>[517247333] High CVE-2026-11686: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Dawn.</li>
	    <li>[517303276] High CVE-2026-11687: Use after free in Dawn.</li>
	    <li>[517309206] High CVE-2026-11688: Object lifecycle issue in SVG.</li>
	    <li>[517486004] High CVE-2026-11689: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Passwords.</li>
	    <li>[517533654] High CVE-2026-11690: Out of bounds read and write in Media.</li>
	    <li>[517585486] High CVE-2026-11691: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in New Tab Page.</li>
	    <li>[517607902] High CVE-2026-11692: Use after free in Read Anything.</li>
	    <li>[517644287] High CVE-2026-11693: Inappropriate implementation in Plugins.</li>
	    <li>[517705966] High CVE-2026-11694: Use after free in ServiceWorker.</li>
	    <li>[517762104] High CVE-2026-11695: Inappropriate implementation in Passwords.</li>
	    <li>[517993381] High CVE-2026-11696: Uninitialized Use in Video.</li>
	    <li>[518105731] High CVE-2026-11697: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in UI.</li>
	    <li>[518235412] High CVE-2026-11698: Use after free in Bluetooth.</li>
	    <li>[518237527] High CVE-2026-11699: Use after free in Bluetooth.</li>
	    <li>[511732085] Medium CVE-2026-11700: Use after free in Tracing.</li>
	    <li>[516413817] Medium CVE-2026-11701: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Guest View.</li>
	 </ul>
       </blockquote>
      </body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11628</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11629</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11630</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11631</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11632</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11633</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11634</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11635</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11636</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11637</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11638</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11639</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11640</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11641</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11642</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11643</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11644</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11645</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11646</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11647</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11648</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11649</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11650</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11651</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11652</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11653</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11654</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11655</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11656</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11657</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11658</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11659</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11660</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11661</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11662</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11663</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11664</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11665</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11666</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11667</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11668</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11669</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11670</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11671</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11672</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11673</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11674</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11675</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11676</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11677</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11678</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11679</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11680</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11681</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11682</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11683</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11684</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11685</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11686</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11687</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11688</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11689</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11690</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11691</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11692</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11693</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11694</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11695</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11696</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11697</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11698</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11699</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11700</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-11701</cvename>
      <url>https://chromereleases.googleblog.com/2026/06/stable-channel-update-for-desktop_0153744567.html</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-06-08</discovery>
      <entry>2026-06-10</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="fc0c7763-6477-11f1-958d-bc241121aa0a">
    <topic>FreeBSD -- Insufficient response validation in the ldns stub resolver</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
	<name>FreeBSD</name>
	<range><ge>15.0</ge><lt>15.0_10</lt></range>
	<range><ge>14.4</ge><lt>14.4_6</lt></range>
	<range><ge>14.3</ge><lt>14.3_15</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<h1>Problem Description:</h1>
	  <p>When used as a stub resolver over UDP, ldns failed to verify
	  that a received response belonged to the outstanding query.  It did
	  not check that the response source address and port matched the
	  query destination, that the transaction ID matched, or that the
	  question section of the response matched that of the query.</p>
	<h1>Impact:</h1>
	  <p>Without these checks, an off-path attacker who cannot observe
	  the query can forge UDP responses that ldns will accept as genuine.
	  By injecting spoofed replies, the attacker can return arbitrary DNS
	  data to any program that uses ldns for stub resolving, including
	  drill(1).</p>
      </body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-10846</cvename>
      <freebsdsa>SA-26:36.ldns</freebsdsa>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-06-09</discovery>
      <entry>2026-06-10</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="71036b90-6476-11f1-958d-bc241121aa0a">
    <topic>FreeBSD -- Integer overflow in vt(4) CONS_HISTORY ioctl</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
	<name>FreeBSD-kernel</name>
	<range><ge>15.0</ge><lt>15.0_10</lt></range>
	<range><ge>14.4</ge><lt>14.4_6</lt></range>
	<range><ge>14.3</ge><lt>14.3_15</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<h1>Problem Description:</h1>
	  <p>The CONS_HISTORY ioctl handler did not adequately validate the
	  requested history size.  A large value caused an integer overflow
	  in the buffer size calculation, resulting in a heap allocation
	  smaller than expected.  Subsequent initialization of the buffer
	  wrote beyond the end of the allocation.</p>
	<h1>Impact:</h1>
	  <p>An unprivileged local user with access to a vt(4) device can
	  trigger an out-of-bounds write in the kernel, potentially escalating
	  privileges.</p>
      </body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-49416</cvename>
      <freebsdsa>SA-26:34.vt</freebsdsa>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-06-09</discovery>
      <entry>2026-06-10</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="b604d3e1-6474-11f1-958d-bc241121aa0a">
    <topic>FreeBSD -- Multiple vulnerabilities in unbound</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
	<name>FreeBSD</name>
	<range><ge>15.0</ge><lt>15.0_10</lt></range>
	<range><ge>14.4</ge><lt>14.4_6</lt></range>
	<range><ge>14.3</ge><lt>14.3_15</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<h1>Problem Description:</h1>
	  <p>Multiple vulnerabilities have been reported in Unbound.  Instead
	  of listing detailed writeups for each issue, please see the upstream
	  advisories referenced below.</p>
	  <ul>
	    <li>CVE-2026-32792: Packet of death with DNSCrypt</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-33278: Possible remote code execution during DNSSEC validation</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-40622: "Ghost domain name" variant</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-41292: Parsing a long list of incoming EDNS options degrades performance</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-42534: Jostle logic bypass degrades resolution performance</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-42923: Degradation of service with unbounded NSEC3 hash calculations</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-42944: Heap overflow and crash with multiple nsid, cookie, padding EDNS options</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-42959: Crash during DNSSEC validation of malicious content</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-42960: Possible cache poisoning while following delegation</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-44390: Unbounded name compression causes degradation of service</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-44608: Use-after-free and crash in RPZ code</li>
	  </ul>
	<h1>Impact:</h1>
	  <p>The issues range from Denial of Service (DoS) through resource
	  exhaustion or crashes to possible remote code execution during
	  DNSSEC validation.  See the upstream Unbound advisories for specific
	  details.</p>
      </body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-32792</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-33278</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-40622</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-41292</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-42534</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-42923</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-42944</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-42959</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-42960</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-44390</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-44608</cvename>
      <freebsdsa>SA-26:33.unbound</freebsdsa>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-06-09</discovery>
      <entry>2026-06-10</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="7e61007e-6474-11f1-958d-bc241121aa0a">
    <topic>FreeBSD-kernel -- ASLR bypass for setuid executables via procctl(2)</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
	<name>FreeBSD-kernel</name>
	<range><ge>15.0</ge><lt>15.0_10</lt></range>
	<range><ge>14.4</ge><lt>14.4_6</lt></range>
	<range><ge>14.3</ge><lt>14.3_15</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<h1>Problem Description:</h1>
	  <p>The ELF image activator cleared per-process ASLR preference
	  flags for setuid binaries after the code that computes the PIE base
	  address, rather than before.  As a result, a user-requested ASLR
	  disable was still in effect at the point where the base address was
	  chosen.</p>
	<h1>Impact:</h1>
	  <p>An unprivileged local user can disable ASLR for a setuid PIE
	  binary by calling procctl(2) before execve(2).  This makes exploitation
	  of any separate memory corruption vulnerability in that binary
	  significantly easier.</p>
      </body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-49414</cvename>
      <freebsdsa>SA-26:32.elf</freebsdsa>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-06-09</discovery>
      <entry>2026-06-10</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="438b0278-6474-11f1-958d-bc241121aa0a">
    <topic>FreeBSD -- Arm CPU errata may bypass page table permission changes</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
	<name>FreeBSD-kernel</name>
	<range><ge>15.0</ge><lt>15.0_10</lt></range>
	<range><ge>14.4</ge><lt>14.4_6</lt></range>
	<range><ge>14.3</ge><lt>14.3_15</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<h1>Problem Description:</h1>
	  <p>Some Arm CPUs have errata where the ordering of stores and the
	  TLBI+DSB sequence may be incorrect.  If one CPU stores to a virtual
	  address while another CPU invalidates the translation for that
	  address, the second CPU's TLBI+DSB may complete before the first
	  CPU's store has been globally observed.</p>
	<h1>Impact:</h1>
	  <p>This erratum may allow software to write to a previously writable
	  location after the page table is modified to forbid writes to that
	  location.  Consequently this may allow software to write to memory
	  owned by a higher exception level, possibly allowing software to
	  escalate privilege to that higher exception level.</p>
      </body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2025-10263</cvename>
      <freebsdsa>SA-26:31.arm64</freebsdsa>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-06-09</discovery>
      <entry>2026-06-10</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="fa5289e4-6473-11f1-958d-bc241121aa0a">
    <topic>FreeBSD -- Flaw in Linuxulator execution of setugid binaries</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
	<name>FreeBSD-kernel</name>
	<range><ge>15.0</ge><lt>15.0_10</lt></range>
	<range><ge>14.4</ge><lt>14.4_6</lt></range>
	<range><ge>14.3</ge><lt>14.3_15</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<h1>Problem Description:</h1>
	  <p>The Linuxulator determined whether a binary was set-user-ID or
	  set-group-ID by checking the P_SUGID process flag.  During execve(2),
	  this flag is not yet set at the point where the auxiliary vector
	  is constructed, so AT_SECURE was incorrectly set to zero for
	  set-user-ID and set-group-ID executables.</p>
	<h1>Impact:</h1>
	  <p>An unprivileged local user can inject a shared library via
	  LD_PRELOAD into a set-user-ID or set-group-ID Linux binary, gaining
	  the privileges of that binary.</p>
      </body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-49413</cvename>
      <freebsdsa>SA-26:30.linux</freebsdsa>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-06-09</discovery>
      <entry>2026-06-10</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="c5b7ac13-6473-11f1-958d-bc241121aa0a">
    <topic>FreeBSD -- Use-after-free bug in the IPV6_MSFILTER socket option handler</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
	<name>FreeBSD-kernel</name>
	<range><ge>15.0</ge><lt>15.0_10</lt></range>
	<range><ge>14.4</ge><lt>14.4_6</lt></range>
	<range><ge>14.3</ge><lt>14.3_15</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<h1>Problem Description:</h1>
	  <p>The kernel handler for IPV6_MSFILTER dropped a serializing lock
	  in order to copy the source-filter list from userspace, then
	  reacquired the lock.  During this window another thread could free
	  the multicast filter structure, leaving the handler with a stale
	  pointer to freed memory.</p>
	<h1>Impact:</h1>
	  <p>An unprivileged local user can exploit this use-after-free to
	  escalate privileges.</p>
      </body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-49412</cvename>
      <freebsdsa>SA-26:28.ip6_multicast</freebsdsa>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-06-09</discovery>
      <entry>2026-06-10</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="94f20492-6473-11f1-958d-bc241121aa0a">
    <topic>FreeBSD -- sigqueue(2) missing capability mode restriction</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
	<name>FreeBSD-kernel</name>
	<range><ge>15.0</ge><lt>15.0_10</lt></range>
	<range><ge>14.4</ge><lt>14.4_6</lt></range>
	<range><ge>14.3</ge><lt>14.3_15</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<h1>Problem Description:</h1>
	  <p>sigqueue(2) was marked as permitted in capability mode with the
	  introduction of Capsicum in 2011, but the implementation of
	  kern_sigqueue did not include a capability mode check restricting
	  signal delivery to the calling process's own PID.</p>
	<h1>Impact:</h1>
	  <p>A process in capability mode can use sigqueue(2) to send signals
	  to any process it could signal following standard Unix permissions,
	  bypassing the Capsicum sandbox restriction.  A compromised sandboxed
	  process could interfere with other processes, for example by sending
	  SIGKILL or SIGSTOP.  This could be any process running as the same
	  user, or any process, for a superuser sandboxed process.</p>
      </body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-45259</cvename>
      <freebsdsa>SA-26:28.capsicum</freebsdsa>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-06-09</discovery>
      <entry>2026-06-10</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="253188dd-6473-11f1-958d-bc241121aa0a">
    <topic>FreeBSD -- Multiple vulnerabilities in the sound(4) mmap path</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
	<name>FreeBSD-kernel</name>
	<range><ge>15.0</ge><lt>15.0_10</lt></range>
	<range><ge>14.4</ge><lt>14.4_6</lt></range>
	<range><ge>14.3</ge><lt>14.3_15</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<h1>Problem Description:</h1>
	  <p>The sound(4) driver contained two memory-safety errors in its
	  mmap(2) support.</p>
	  <p>First, dsp_mmap_single() validated the requested mapping by checking
	  the sum of the user-supplied offset and length against the buffer
	  size.  This addition could overflow, so that a large offset and
	  length wrapped around and passed the check.  The offset was then
	  narrowed from 64 to 32 bits when converted to a buffer address,
	  yielding a mapping that extended past the audio buffer into unrelated
	  kernel memory.  (CVE-2026-45258)</p>
	  <p>Second, the audio buffer backing a mapping could be freed when the
	  device was closed even though the mapping remained valid.  The freed
	  memory could then be reused elsewhere while still accessible through
	  the stale mapping.  (CVE-2026-49417)</p>
	<h1>Impact:</h1>
	  <p>The /dev/dsp device nodes are world-accessible by default.  On
	  a system with an audio device, either issue allows an unprivileged
	  local user to read and write kernel memory, which can be used to
	  escalate privileges, potentially gaining full control of the affected
	  system.  At a minimum, an attacker can crash the kernel, resulting
	  in a Denial of Service (DoS).</p>
      </body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-45258</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-49417</cvename>
      <freebsdsa>SA-26:27.sound</freebsdsa>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-06-09</discovery>
      <entry>2026-06-10</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="f2c4892a-6472-11f1-958d-bc241121aa0a">
    <topic>FreeBSD -- Arbitrary file overwrite via the KTLS receive path</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
	<name>FreeBSD-kernel</name>
	<range><ge>15.0</ge><lt>15.0_10</lt></range>
	<range><ge>14.4</ge><lt>14.4_6</lt></range>
	<range><ge>14.3</ge><lt>14.3_15</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<h1>Problem Description:</h1>
	  <p>The KTLS receive path decrypted each record in place, assuming
	  that the mbufs holding received data were anonymous and safe to
	  modify.  This assumption does not hold for data placed on a socket
	  by sendfile(2), which can reference file-backed memory directly
	  through non-anonymous M_EXTPG pages or EXT_SFBUF mbufs.  When the
	  sender transmits such data over a loopback connection without
	  enabling KTLS on the transmit side, the file-backed mbufs reach the
	  receiver's decryption path unchanged.  Decrypting a record in place
	  then overwrites the backing file's page cache instead of a private
	  copy of the data.</p>
	<h1>Impact:</h1>
	  <p>An unprivileged local user who can read a file can overwrite
	  its contents with data of their choosing by sending the file over
	  a loopback connection on which they have enabled KTLS receive.  The
	  write modifies the page cache directly, so it bypasses file flags
	  such as schg and is written back to disk.  By overwriting a setuid
	  binary or other trusted file, a local user can escalate privileges,
	  potentially gaining full control of the affected system.</p>
      </body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-45257</cvename>
      <freebsdsa>SA-26:26.ktls</freebsdsa>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-06-09</discovery>
      <entry>2026-06-10</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="91163897-6472-11f1-958d-bc241121aa0a">
    <topic>FreeBSD -- Missing permission check in thr_kill2(2)</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
	<name>FreeBSD-kernel</name>
	<range><ge>15.0</ge><lt>15.0_10</lt></range>
	<range><ge>14.4</ge><lt>14.4_6</lt></range>
	<range><ge>14.3</ge><lt>14.3_15</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<h1>Problem Description:</h1>
	  <p>When used to deliver a signal to a specific thread, thr_kill2(2)
	  called p_cansignal() to determine whether the operation was permitted
	  but did not check the result before delivering the signal.  The
	  signal was sent even when the permission check failed.  The system
	  call returned the resulting error to the caller, but by then the
	  signal had already been delivered.</p>
	<h1>Impact:</h1>
	  <p>The missing check allows an unprivileged local user who knows
	  or can guess a target's process and thread IDs to send any signal
	  to a process they would not normally be permitted to signal, including
	  processes owned by other users or by root.  The same check enforces
	  jail boundaries, so a jailed process can signal processes on the
	  host or in other jails.  Thread IDs are allocated globally and
	  sequentially, and so can be discovered by brute force with no
	  visibility into the target.</p>
	  <p>An attacker can stop or terminate arbitrary processes, including
	  critical system daemons, resulting in a Denial of Service (DoS).</p>
      </body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-45256</cvename>
      <freebsdsa>SA-26:25.thr</freebsdsa>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-06-09</discovery>
      <entry>2026-06-10</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="45accfb8-56e4-41b7-8463-572ce643fde0">
    <topic>Elixir -- Denial of service via unbounded integer parsing in Version</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
	<name>elixir</name>
	<range><ge>1.5.0</ge><le>1.19.5</le></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>PJUllrich reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://github.com/elixir-lang/elixir/security/advisories/GHSA-w2h8-8x3g-278p">
	  <p>The Version module parses numeric version components without
	    length limits. Untrusted input can trigger creation of
	    arbitrary-precision integers, causing CPU and memory exhaustion.</p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-49762</cvename>
      <url>https://github.com/elixir-lang/elixir/security/advisories/GHSA-w2h8-8x3g-278p</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-06-09</discovery>
      <entry>2026-06-09</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="f778ad20-0d5f-49c4-af45-4493ff0696d9">
    <topic>Elixir -- Denial of service via unbounded integer parsing in Version</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
	<name>elixir-devel</name>
	<range><ge>1.5.0</ge><lt>1.20.1</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>PJUllrich reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://github.com/elixir-lang/elixir/security/advisories/GHSA-w2h8-8x3g-278p">
	  <p>The Version module parses numeric version components without
	    length limits. Untrusted input can trigger creation of
	    arbitrary-precision integers, causing CPU and memory exhaustion.</p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-49762</cvename>
      <url>https://github.com/elixir-lang/elixir/security/advisories/GHSA-w2h8-8x3g-278p</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-06-09</discovery>
      <entry>2026-06-09</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="7655baae-637d-11f1-8607-8447094a420f">
    <topic>Apache httpd -- Multiple vulnerabilities</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
	<name>apache24</name>
	<range><lt>2.4.68</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>The Apache httpd project reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://downloads.apache.org/httpd/CHANGES_2.4.68">
	  <p>See links for details.</p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-48913</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-44631</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-44186</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-44185</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-44119</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-43951</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-42536</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-42535</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-34356</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-34355</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-29170</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-29167</cvename>
      <url>https://downloads.apache.org/httpd/CHANGES_2.4.68</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-06-08</discovery>
      <entry>2026-06-08</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="72e5b334-6365-11f1-8c57-000af7b98cf6">
    <topic>Unbound -- Multiple vulnerabilities</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
	<name>unbound</name>
	<range><lt>1.25.1</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>NLnet Labs reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://www.nlnetlabs.nl/news/2026/May/20/unbound-1.25.1-released/">
	  <p>This release consolidates security fixes for issues reported
	    over a period of time. There are fixes for:</p>
	  <ul>
	    <li>CVE-2026-33278: Possible remote code execution during
	      DNSSEC validation.</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-42944: Heap overflow and crash with multiple
	      nsid, cookie, padding EDNS options.</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-42959: Crash during DNSSEC validation of
	      malicious content.</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-32792: Packet of death with DNSCrypt.</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-40622: "Ghost domain name" variant.</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-41292: Parsing a long list of incoming EDNS
	      options degrades performance.</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-42534: Jostle logic bypass degrades resolution
	      performance.</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-42923: Degradation of service with unbounded
	      NSEC3 hash calculations.</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-42960: Possible cache poisoning attack while
	      following delegation.</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-44390: Unbounded name compression in certain
	      cases causes degradation of service.</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-44608: Use after free and crash in RPZ code.</li>
	  </ul>
	</blockquote>
      </body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-32792</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-33278</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-40622</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-41292</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-42534</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-42923</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-42944</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-42959</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-42960</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-44390</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-44608</cvename>
      <url>https://www.nlnetlabs.nl/projects/unbound/security-advisories/</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-05-20</discovery>
      <entry>2026-06-08</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="a207a367-6359-11f1-8c57-000af7b98cf6">
    <topic>strongSwan -- Double-free when destroying certain cloned identities that can lead to remote code execution</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
	<name>strongswan</name>
	<range><ge>4.3.3</ge><lt>6.0.7</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>R. Elliott Childre reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://www.strongswan.org/blog/2026/06/08/strongswan-vulnerability-(cve-2026-47895).html">
	<p>The clone() method of the identification_t class doesn't correctly handle identities that have an empty but
	non-NULL encoding. Both objects will point to the same location, resulting in a double-free once the second object
	is destroyed. This can lead to a crash and could potentially be exploitable for remote code execution. Affected are
	all strongSwan versions since 4.3.3.</p>
	</blockquote>
      </body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-47895</cvename>
      <url>https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-47895</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-06-08</discovery>
      <entry>2026-06-08</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="df803002-624e-11f1-8607-8447094a420f">
    <topic>Weechat -- Multiple vulnerabilities</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
	<name>weechat</name>
	<range><lt>4.9.1</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>The Weechat project reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://weechat.org/download/weechat/4.9.1/">
	  <p>See links for detail.</p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <url>https://weechat.org/download/weechat/4.9.1/</url>
      <url>https://weechat.org/doc/weechat/security/#WSA-2026-1</url>
      <url>https://weechat.org/doc/weechat/security/#WSA-2026-2</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-05-31</discovery>
      <entry>2026-06-07</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="d31259c0-624d-11f1-8607-8447094a420f">
    <topic>Weechat -- Multiple vulnerabilities</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
	<name>weechat</name>
	<range><lt>4.9.2</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>The Weechat project reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://weechat.org/download/weechat/4.9.2/">
	  <p>See links for detail.</p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <url>https://weechat.org/download/weechat/4.9.2/</url>
      <url>https://weechat.org/doc/weechat/security/#WSA-2026-3</url>
      <url>https://weechat.org/doc/weechat/security/#WSA-2026-4</url>
      <url>https://weechat.org/doc/weechat/security/#WSA-2026-5</url>
      <url>https://weechat.org/doc/weechat/security/#WSA-2026-6</url>
      <url>https://weechat.org/doc/weechat/security/#WSA-2026-7</url>
      <url>https://weechat.org/doc/weechat/security/#WSA-2026-8</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-06-07</discovery>
      <entry>2026-06-07</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="9b94eb13-6159-11f1-be36-2cf05da270f3">
    <topic>Gitlab -- vulnerabilities</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
	<name>gitlab-ce</name>
	<name>gitlab-ee</name>
	<range><ge>19.0.0</ge><lt>19.0.1</lt></range>
	<range><ge>18.11.0</ge><lt>18.11.4</lt></range>
	<range><ge>12.7.0</ge><lt>18.10.7</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>Gitlab reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://docs.gitlab.com/releases/patches/patch-release-gitlab-19-0-1-released/">
	  <p>Improper Access Control issue in Duo AI workflow runners impacts GitLab EE</p>
	  <p>Denial of Service issue in Wiki impacts GitLab CE/EE</p>
	  <p>Incorrect Authorization issue in GraphQL WorkItem API impacts GitLab CE/EE</p>
	  <p>Improper Authorization issue in Duo Workflows API impacts GitLab EE</p>
	  <p>Missing Authorization issue in Operations impacts GitLab EE</p>
	  <p>Incorrect Name Resolution issue in Pipelines impacts GitLab CE/EE</p>
	  <p>Incorrect Authorization issue in certain authentication endpoints impacts GitLab CE/EE</p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-4868</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-1402</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-6713</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-5296</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-2601</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-8716</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-2710</cvename>
      <url>https://docs.gitlab.com/releases/patches/patch-release-gitlab-19-0-1-released/</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-05-27</discovery>
      <entry>2026-06-06</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="0823ac26-6040-11f1-ba4a-50ebf6bdf8e9">
    <topic>PowerDNS -- Multiple vulnerabilities</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
	<name>powerdns</name>
	<range><lt>5.0.5</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>PowerDNS Team reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://blog.powerdns.com/2026/05/20/powerdns-security-advisory-2026-06-for-powerdns-authoritative-server">
	<p>2025-07: Internal logic flaw in cache management can lead to
	a denial of service in Recursor</p>
	  <p>When using views, queries sent using TCP Proxy Protocol will select
	    the view according to the address of the proxy, rather than the address
	    of the initial query. This can lead to wrong data being returned.</p>
	  <p>Missing escaping of special characters (such as $ or @) in DNS names
	    received during an AXFR operation can lead to an incorrect
	    (non-parseable) Bind backend configuration to be written, causing this
	    backend to fail until manual operation is performed to fix the
	    configuration.</p>
	  <p>Missing sanity checks of the answer to the initial SOA query, when
	    running in auto-secondary mode and receiving a notification for an
	    not-yet-known domain may cause the server to crash.</p>
	  <p>Multiple concurrency and locking defects in the GSS-TSIG code can
	    lead to memory corruption due to accidental data structure sharing,
	    which can in turn lead to a program crash.</p>
	  <p>Missing proper escaping of double-quote characters when computing
	    labels will cause AXFR of a catalog zone with a member whose producer
	    group option contains such a character to fail.</p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-41999</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-42000</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-42001</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-42002</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-42396</cvename>
      <url>https://doc.powerdns.com/authoritative/security-advisories/powerdns-advisory-2026-06.html</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-05-20</discovery>
      <entry>2026-06-04</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="0d6d9d9b-5feb-11f1-8607-8447094a420f">
    <topic>Apache httpd -- DoS exploit in HTTP/2</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
	<name>apache24</name>
	<range><lt>2.4.67_2</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>Calif security reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://blog.calif.io/p/codex-discovered-a-hidden-http2-bomb">
	  <p>Remote DoS in mod_http2</p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-49975</cvename>
      <url>https://blog.calif.io/p/codex-discovered-a-hidden-http2-bomb</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-06-02</discovery>
      <entry>2026-06-04</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="36cb0ced-5e23-11f1-86a2-589cfc10a551">
    <topic>xwayland -- Multiple vulnerabilities</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
	<name>xwayland</name>
	<range><lt>24.1.12,1</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>X.Org project reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-announce/2026-June/003702.html">
	  <p>Multiple issues have been found in the X server and Xwayland
	     implementations published by X.Org for which we are releasing
	     security fixes for in xorg-server-21.1.23 and xwayland-24.1.12.</p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-50256</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-50257</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-50258</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-50259</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-50260</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-50261</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-50262</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-50263</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-50264</cvename>
      <url>https://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-announce/2026-June/003702.html</url>
      <url>https://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-announce/2026-June/003705.html</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-06-01</discovery>
      <entry>2026-06-01</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="592ced15-5e20-11f1-86a2-589cfc10a551">
    <topic>xorg-server -- Multiple vulnerabilities</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
	<name>xorg-server</name>
	<range><lt>21.1.23,1</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>X.Org project reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-announce/2026-June/003702.html">
	  <p>Multiple issues have been found in the X server and Xwayland
	     implementations published by X.Org for which we are releasing
	     security fixes for in xorg-server-21.1.23 and xwayland-24.1.12.</p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-50256</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-50257</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-50258</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-50259</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-50260</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-50261</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-50262</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-50263</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-50264</cvename>
      <url>https://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-announce/2026-June/003702.html</url>
      <url>https://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-announce/2026-June/003705.html</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-06-01</discovery>
      <entry>2026-06-01</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="e725f5d5-5c24-11f1-b189-a8a1599412c6">
    <topic>chromium -- security fixes</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
       <name>chromium</name>
       <range><lt>148.0.7778.215</lt></range>
      </package>
      <package>
       <name>ungoogled-chromium</name>
       <range><lt>148.0.7778.215</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
       <p>Chrome Releases reports:</p>
       <blockquote cite="https://chromereleases.googleblog.com/2026/05/stable-channel-update-for-desktop_0877304591.html">
	 <p>This update includes 151 security fixes:</p>
	 <ul>
	    <li>[505077859] Critical CVE-2026-9872: Out of bounds write in GPU.</li>
	    <li>[507365348] Critical CVE-2026-9873: Use after free in Network.</li>
	    <li>[500609038] Critical CVE-2026-9874: Use after free in Dawn.</li>
	    <li>[507508103] Critical CVE-2026-9875: Out of bounds read in WebGL.</li>
	    <li>[493747593] Critical CVE-2026-9876: Use after free in WebGL.</li>
	    <li>[496445460] Critical CVE-2026-9877: Use after free in ANGLE.</li>
	    <li>[499054245] Critical CVE-2026-9878: Use after free in ANGLE.</li>
	    <li>[499129768] Critical CVE-2026-9879: Out of bounds write in ANGLE.</li>
	    <li>[503615025] Critical CVE-2026-9880: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in WebGL.</li>
	    <li>[505140741] Critical CVE-2026-9881: Use after free in Bluetooth.</li>
	    <li>[506375217] Critical CVE-2026-9882: Integer overflow in ANGLE.</li>
	    <li>[506477192] Critical CVE-2026-9883: Use after free in Base.</li>
	    <li>[508289938] Critical CVE-2026-9884: Use after free in Browser.</li>
	    <li>[508452241] Critical CVE-2026-9885: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in UI.</li>
	    <li>[508456788] Critical CVE-2026-9886: Use after free in Base.</li>
	    <li>[511249104] Critical CVE-2026-9887: Use after free in Proxy.</li>
	    <li>[511715166] Critical CVE-2026-9888: Use after free in WebView.</li>
	    <li>[511727159] Critical CVE-2026-9889: Out of bounds read and write in Dawn.</li>
	    <li>[513135985] Critical CVE-2026-9890: Use after free in XR.</li>
	    <li>[513508128] Critical CVE-2026-9891: Use after free in Extensions.</li>
	    <li>[513948178] Critical CVE-2026-9892: Inappropriate implementation in Skia.</li>
	    <li>[513972075] Critical CVE-2026-9893: Use after free in Skia.</li>
	    <li>[507707838] High CVE-2026-9894: Use after free in GPU.</li>
	    <li>[491685406] High CVE-2026-9895: Out of bounds read in GPU.</li>
	    <li>[508811474] High CVE-2026-9896: Out of bounds write in V8.</li>
	    <li>[496271580] High CVE-2026-9897: Use after free in DOM.</li>
	    <li>[496282591] High CVE-2026-9898: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in GPU.</li>
	    <li>[497533569] High CVE-2026-9899: Use after free in ANGLE.</li>
	    <li>[497637277] High CVE-2026-9900: Out of bounds write in ANGLE.</li>
	    <li>[497737770] High CVE-2026-9901: Use after free in ANGLE.</li>
	    <li>[498205735] High CVE-2026-9902: Use after free in Accessibility.</li>
	    <li>[498783665] High CVE-2026-9903: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Site Isolation.</li>
	    <li>[498804020] High CVE-2026-9904: Use after free in ANGLE.</li>
	    <li>[498883610] High CVE-2026-9905: Use after free in Accessibility.</li>
	    <li>[499005260] High CVE-2026-9906: Out of bounds write in GPU.</li>
	    <li>[499091269] High CVE-2026-9907: Out of bounds read in Dawn.</li>
	    <li>[499091328] High CVE-2026-9908: Out of bounds read in ANGLE.</li>
	    <li>[499152771] High CVE-2026-9909: Integer overflow in Skia.</li>
	    <li>[499176133] High CVE-2026-9910: Out of bounds memory access in ANGLE.</li>
	    <li>[499205491] High CVE-2026-9911: Integer overflow in ANGLE.</li>
	    <li>[499873765] High CVE-2026-9912: Inappropriate implementation in GPU.</li>
	    <li>[500046096] High CVE-2026-9913: Inappropriate implementation in ANGLE.</li>
	    <li>[500047428] High CVE-2026-9914: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in ANGLE.</li>
	    <li>[500063836] High CVE-2026-9915: Heap buffer overflow in ANGLE.</li>
	    <li>[500080303] High CVE-2026-9916: Out of bounds write in ANGLE.</li>
	    <li>[500095304] High CVE-2026-9917: Uninitialized Use in WebGL.</li>
	    <li>[500099471] High CVE-2026-9918: Inappropriate implementation in Tint.</li>
	    <li>[500114058] High CVE-2026-9919: Out of bounds read in WebGL.</li>
	    <li>[500138014] High CVE-2026-9920: Uninitialized Use in GPU.</li>
	    <li>[500150338] High CVE-2026-9921: Uninitialized Use in WebGL.</li>
	    <li>[500187083] High CVE-2026-9922: Use after free in GPU.</li>
	    <li>[500393328] High CVE-2026-9923: Use after free in Skia.</li>
	    <li>[500398345] High CVE-2026-9924: Heap buffer overflow in ANGLE.</li>
	    <li>[500536458] High CVE-2026-9925: Use after free in ANGLE.</li>
	    <li>[500540748] High CVE-2026-9926: Heap buffer overflow in ANGLE.</li>
	    <li>[500540958] High CVE-2026-9927: Use after free in ANGLE.</li>
	    <li>[501125002] High CVE-2026-9928: Out of bounds read in ANGLE.</li>
	    <li>[501367791] High CVE-2026-9929: Inappropriate implementation in WebGL.</li>
	    <li>[501499832] High CVE-2026-9930: Out of bounds write in Dawn.</li>
	    <li>[501524262] High CVE-2026-9931: Use after free in GPU.</li>
	    <li>[501563323] High CVE-2026-9932: Use after free in ANGLE.</li>
	    <li>[501575979] High CVE-2026-9933: Use after free in Input.</li>
	    <li>[501576946] High CVE-2026-9934: Use after free in Aura.</li>
	    <li>[501584689] High CVE-2026-9935: Uninitialized Use in ANGLE.</li>
	    <li>[502104354] High CVE-2026-9936: Use after free in GFX.</li>
	    <li>[502112506] High CVE-2026-9937: Use after free in UI.</li>
	    <li>[502300817] High CVE-2026-9938: Inappropriate implementation in V8.</li>
	    <li>[502735235] High CVE-2026-9939: Heap buffer overflow in WebCodecs.</li>
	    <li>[502738003] High CVE-2026-9940: Heap buffer overflow in ANGLE.</li>
	    <li>[502812366] High CVE-2026-9941: Use after free in ANGLE.</li>
	    <li>[503438092] High CVE-2026-9942: Uninitialized Use in ANGLE.</li>
	    <li>[503464551] High CVE-2026-9943: Out of bounds read in WebGL.</li>
	    <li>[503471286] High CVE-2026-9944: Uninitialized Use in ANGLE.</li>
	    <li>[503565293] High CVE-2026-9945: Use after free in Media.</li>
	    <li>[503596863] High CVE-2026-9946: Use after free in ANGLE.</li>
	    <li>[503627446] High CVE-2026-9947: Use after free in XML.</li>
	    <li>[503790201] High CVE-2026-9948: Use after free in Views.</li>
	    <li>[503793153] High CVE-2026-9949: Use after free in Core.</li>
	    <li>[503862359] High CVE-2026-9950: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in iOS.</li>
	    <li>[503873388] High CVE-2026-9951: Use after free in UI.</li>
	    <li>[503929476] High CVE-2026-9952: Use after free in WebAudio.</li>
	    <li>[503985322] High CVE-2026-9953: Out of bounds read in ANGLE.</li>
	    <li>[504175497] High CVE-2026-9954: Use after free in TabStrip.</li>
	    <li>[504184408] High CVE-2026-9955: Inappropriate implementation in iOS.</li>
	    <li>[504195132] High CVE-2026-9956: Use after free in iOS.</li>
	    <li>[504516117] High CVE-2026-9957: Use after free in PDF.</li>
	    <li>[504555886] High CVE-2026-9958: Use after free in PDFium.</li>
	    <li>[504557432] High CVE-2026-9959: Race in WebRTC.</li>
	    <li>[504573260] High CVE-2026-9960: Integer overflow in PDFium.</li>
	    <li>[504710769] High CVE-2026-9961: Use after free in SurfaceCapture.</li>
	    <li>[504716948] High CVE-2026-9962: Use after free in WebRTC.</li>
	    <li>[505143241] High CVE-2026-9963: Uninitialized Use in iOS.</li>
	    <li>[505190999] High CVE-2026-9964: Use after free in Bluetooth.</li>
	    <li>[506377574] High CVE-2026-9965: Out of bounds write in ANGLE.</li>
	    <li>[506388321] High CVE-2026-9966: Integer overflow in XML.</li>
	    <li>[506414791] High CVE-2026-9967: Out of bounds write in GPU.</li>
	    <li>[506499280] High CVE-2026-9968: Integer overflow in V8.</li>
	    <li>[506550494] High CVE-2026-9969: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in ANGLE.</li>
	    <li>[506653647] High CVE-2026-9970: Use after free in WebGL.</li>
	    <li>[508448586] High CVE-2026-9971: Inappropriate implementation in iOS.</li>
	    <li>[508463705] High CVE-2026-9972: Uninitialized Use in Gamepad.</li>
	    <li>[509268941] High CVE-2026-9973: Out of bounds write in V8.</li>
	    <li>[511710468] High CVE-2026-9974: Out of bounds write in GPU.</li>
	    <li>[511719039] High CVE-2026-9975: Out of bounds read and write in ANGLE.</li>
	    <li>[511732828] High CVE-2026-9976: Inappropriate implementation in USB.</li>
	    <li>[511741173] High CVE-2026-9977: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in WebShare.</li>
	    <li>[511741396] High CVE-2026-9978: Use after free in Glic.</li>
	    <li>[511742228] High CVE-2026-9979: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Input.</li>
	    <li>[511776372] High CVE-2026-9980: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Printing.</li>
	    <li>[512995705] High CVE-2026-9981: Inappropriate implementation in Skia.</li>
	    <li>[513001247] High CVE-2026-9982: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in ANGLE.</li>
	    <li>[513001309] High CVE-2026-9983: Type Confusion in Skia.</li>
	    <li>[513002543] High CVE-2026-9984: Use after free in UI.</li>
	    <li>[513019760] High CVE-2026-9985: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Media.</li>
	    <li>[513028160] High CVE-2026-9986: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in OptimizationGuide.</li>
	    <li>[513046475] High CVE-2026-9987: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in WebAppInstalls.</li>
	    <li>[513049286] High CVE-2026-9988: Use after free in WebRTC.</li>
	    <li>[513054053] High CVE-2026-9989: Inappropriate implementation in Media.</li>
	    <li>[513128608] High CVE-2026-9990: Use after free in WebAppInstalls.</li>
	    <li>[513173565] High CVE-2026-9991: Inappropriate implementation in Media.</li>
	    <li>[513177826] High CVE-2026-9992: Use after free in Network.</li>
	    <li>[513208588] High CVE-2026-9993: Use after free in Views.</li>
	    <li>[513235131] High CVE-2026-9994: Use after free in Core.</li>
	    <li>[513256572] High CVE-2026-9995: Use after free in WebXR.</li>
	    <li>[513268100] High CVE-2026-9996: Out of bounds read in WebRTC.</li>
	    <li>[513324041] High CVE-2026-9997: Use after free in Input.</li>
	    <li>[513337118] High CVE-2026-9998: Integer overflow in Skia.</li>
	    <li>[513364480] High CVE-2026-9999: Inappropriate implementation in ANGLE.</li>
	    <li>[513505608] High CVE-2026-10000: Use after free in Passwords.</li>
	    <li>[513505927] High CVE-2026-10001: Use after free in PerformanceManager.</li>
	    <li>[513536416] High CVE-2026-10002: Use after free in PDFium.</li>
	    <li>[513609324] High CVE-2026-10003: Use after free in Views.</li>
	    <li>[513730012] High CVE-2026-10004: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Passwords.</li>
	    <li>[513750089] High CVE-2026-10005: Use after free in WebAppInstalls.</li>
	    <li>[513750691] High CVE-2026-10006: Race in WebAudio.</li>
	    <li>[513754619] High CVE-2026-10007: Use after free in SVG.</li>
	    <li>[513768979] High CVE-2026-10008: Uninitialized Use in GPU.</li>
	    <li>[513973560] High CVE-2026-10009: Integer overflow in Skia.</li>
	    <li>[513995565] High CVE-2026-10010: Inappropriate implementation in Input.</li>
	    <li>[514017326] High CVE-2026-10011: Inappropriate implementation in Skia.</li>
	    <li>[514063977] High CVE-2026-10012: Use after free in Skia.</li>
	    <li>[514715455] High CVE-2026-10013: Use after free in WebCodecs.</li>
	    <li>[514742327] High CVE-2026-10014: Use after free in WebMIDI.</li>
	    <li>[514746176] High CVE-2026-10015: Integer overflow in WTF.</li>
	    <li>[515155946] High CVE-2026-10016: Use after free in DOM.</li>
	    <li>[504156069] Medium CVE-2026-10017: Out of bounds read in Headless.</li>
	    <li>[504175501] Medium CVE-2026-10018: Integer overflow in ANGLE.</li>
	    <li>[505056913] Medium CVE-2026-10019: Integer overflow in ANGLE.</li>
	    <li>[496565479] Medium CVE-2026-10020: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Skia.</li>
	    <li>[497327715] Medium CVE-2026-10021: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in USB.</li>
	    <li>[513289241] Medium CVE-2026-10022: Type Confusion in V8.</li>
	 </ul>
       </blockquote>
      </body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-9872</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-9873</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-9874</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-9875</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-9876</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-9877</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-9878</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-9879</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-9880</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-9881</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-9882</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-9883</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-9884</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-9885</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-9886</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-9887</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-9888</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-9889</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-9890</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-9891</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-9892</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-9893</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-9894</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-9895</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-9896</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-9897</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-9898</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-9899</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-9900</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-9901</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-9902</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-9903</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-9904</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-9905</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-9906</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-9907</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-9908</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-9909</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-9910</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-9911</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-9912</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-9913</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-9914</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-9915</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-9916</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-9917</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-9918</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-9919</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-9920</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-9921</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-9922</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-9923</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-9924</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-9925</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-9926</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-9927</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-9928</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-9929</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-9930</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-9931</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-9932</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-9933</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-9934</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-9935</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-9936</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-9937</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-9938</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-9939</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-9940</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-9941</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-9942</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-9943</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-9944</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-9945</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-9946</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-9947</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-9948</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-9949</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-9950</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-9951</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-9952</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-9953</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-9954</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-9955</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-9956</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-9957</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-9958</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-9959</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-9960</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-9961</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-9962</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-9963</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-9964</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-9965</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-9966</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-9967</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-9968</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-9969</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-9970</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-9971</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-9972</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-9973</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-9974</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-9975</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-9976</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-9977</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-9978</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-9979</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-9980</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-9981</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-9982</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-9983</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-9984</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-9985</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-9986</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-9987</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-9988</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-9989</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-9990</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-9991</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-9992</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-9993</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-9994</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-9995</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-9996</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-9997</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-9998</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-9999</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-10000</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-10001</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-10002</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-10003</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-10004</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-10005</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-10006</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-10007</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-10008</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-10009</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-10010</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-10011</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-10012</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-10013</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-10014</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-10015</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-10016</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-10017</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-10018</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-10019</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-10020</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-10021</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-10022</cvename>
      <url>https://chromereleases.googleblog.com/2026/05/stable-channel-update-for-desktop_0877304591.html</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-05-27</discovery>
      <entry>2026-05-30</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="20d59b47-5ba3-11f1-bf1b-b42e991fc52e">
    <topic>www/gohugo -- CWE-79: XSS vulnerabilities</topic>
    <affects>
    <package>
	<name>gohugo</name>
	<range><lt>0.162.0,1</lt></range>
    </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>https://go.dev/issue/78913 reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://go.dev/issue/78913">
	<p>
	CVE-2026-27142 fixed a vulnerability in which URLs were
	not correctly escaped inside of a &lt;meta&gt; tag's
	&lt;content&gt; attribute. If the URL content were to
	insert ASCII whitespaces around the '=' rune inside of the
	&lt;content&gt; attribute, the escaper would fail to
	similarly escape it, leading to XSS.
	</p>
	<p>
	If a trusted template author were to write a &lt;script&gt;
	tag containing an empty 'type' attribute or a 'type'
	attribute with an ASCII whitespace, the execution of the
	template would incorrectly escape any data passed into the
	&lt;script&gt; block.
	</p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-39823</cvename>
      <url>https://cveawg.mitre.org/api/cve/CVE-2026-39823</url>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-39826</cvename>
      <url>https://cveawg.mitre.org/api/cve/CVE-2026-39826</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-05-07</discovery>
      <entry>2026-05-29</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="2eb8a9ab-5b5d-11f1-8607-8447094a420f">
    <topic>MariaDB -- Multiple vulnerabilities</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
	<name>mariadb118-server</name>
	<range><lt>11.8.8</lt></range>
      </package>
      <package>
	<name>mariadb114-server</name>
	<range><lt>11.4.12</lt></range>
      </package>
      <package>
	<name>mariadb1011-server</name>
	<range><lt>10.11.18</lt></range>
      </package>
      <package>
	<name>mariadb106-server</name>
	<range><lt>10.6.27</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>The MariaDB project reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://mariadb.com/docs/release-notes/community-server/11.8/11.8.8">
	  <p>Multiple vulnerabilities in MariaDB Cluster (Galera)</p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-48165</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-48163</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-49261</cvename>
      <url>https://mariadb.com/docs/release-notes/community-server/11.8/11.8.8</url>
      <url>https://mariadb.com/docs/release-notes/community-server/11.4/11.4.12</url>
      <url>https://mariadb.com/docs/release-notes/community-server/10.11/10.11.8</url>
      <url>https://mariadb.com/docs/release-notes/community-server/10.6/10.6.27</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-05-28</discovery>
      <entry>2026-05-29</entry>
      <modified>2026-05-30</modified>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="7ae38fde-5ab6-11f1-a242-10ffe07f9334">
    <topic>mail/mailpit -- memory-exhaustion DoS via unbounded JSON body</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
	<name>mailpit</name>
	<range><lt>1.30.1</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>Mailpit author reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://github.com/axllent/mailpit/releases/tag/v1.30.1">
	  <p>Sibling-endpoint memory-exhaustion DoS via unbounded
	  JSON body on /api/v1/messages, /api/v1/tags, and
	  /api/v1/message/{id}/release</p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-48824</cvename>
      <url>https://github.com/axllent/mailpit/security/advisories/GHSA-28pq-6qxg-wg5r</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-05-28</discovery>
      <entry>2026-05-28</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="ca91c020-5820-11f1-b38d-9be2e6022e28">
    <topic>OpenEXR -- 3.4.12 fixes multiple vulnerabilities</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
	<name>openexr</name>
	<range><lt>3.4.12</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>Cary Phillips reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://github.com/AcademySoftwareFoundation/openexr/releases/tag/v3.4.12">
	  <p>[The OpenEXR 3.4.12] release addresses the following security vulnerabilities:</p>
	  <ul>
	    <li>CVE-2026-45696 OpenEXR ht_undo_impl heap-buffer-overflow READ via codestream/channel width mismatch in HTJ2K decode</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-44663 Integer overflow in HTJ2K decoder ( ht_undo_impl ) leading to heap-buffer-overflow</li>
	    <li>OSS-Fuzz 512895184 Null-dereference WRITE in Imf_4_0::TileProcess::run_decode</li>
	    <li>OSS-fuzz 512314697 Direct-leak in internal_exr_add_part</li>
	    <li>OSS-fuzz 508362159 Heap-buffer-overflow in DwaCompressor_uncompress</li>
	    <li>OSS-fuzz 507413960 Heap-buffer-overflow in generic_unpack</li>
	  </ul>
	</blockquote>
      </body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-45696</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-44663</cvename>
      <url>https://github.com/AcademySoftwareFoundation/openexr/releases/tag/v3.4.12</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-05-25</discovery>
      <entry>2026-05-25</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="93576148-5a54-11f1-b886-4c526214c986">
    <topic>Erlang/OTP -- TLS hostname verification bypass via Subject CommonName fallback and name constraints</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
	<name>erlang</name>
	<range><ge>19.3,3</ge><lt>26.2.5.21,4</lt></range>
      </package>
      <package>
	<name>erlang-runtime27</name>
	<range><lt>27.3.4.12</lt></range>
      </package>
      <package>
	<name>erlang-runtime28</name>
	<range><lt>28.5.0.1</lt></range>
      </package>
      <package>
	<name>erlang-runtime29</name>
	<range><lt>29.0.1</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>https://github.com/erlang/otp/security/advisories/GHSA-22cw-4ph4-6447 reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://github.com/erlang/otp/security/advisories/GHSA-22cw-4ph4-6447">
	  <p>Erlang/OTP's TLS hostname verification implements a legacy
	  RFC 6125 fallback that checks the Subject CommonName when the
	  Subject Alternative Name (SAN) extension is absent, rather
	  than following RFC 9525 which requires validation to fail
	  without SAN. Combined with weak handling of X.509 Name
	  Constraints, this enables man-in-the-middle attacks when an
	  attacker controls a DNS-constrained sub-CA and can intercept
	  network traffic, allowing forgery of certificates for
	  unauthorized domains.</p>
	</blockquote>
      </body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-42790</cvename>
      <url>https://github.com/erlang/otp/security/advisories/GHSA-22cw-4ph4-6447</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-05-27</discovery>
      <entry>2026-05-28</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="9357a450-5a54-11f1-b886-4c526214c986">
    <topic>Erlang/OTP -- public_key accepts non-CA certificate as intermediate issuer</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
	<name>erlang</name>
	<range><ge>17.0,3</ge><lt>26.2.5.21,4</lt></range>
      </package>
      <package>
	<name>erlang-runtime27</name>
	<range><lt>27.3.4.12</lt></range>
      </package>
      <package>
	<name>erlang-runtime28</name>
	<range><lt>28.5.0.1</lt></range>
      </package>
      <package>
	<name>erlang-runtime29</name>
	<range><lt>29.0.1</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>https://github.com/erlang/otp/security/advisories/GHSA-c99q-jmpx-v8qq reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://github.com/erlang/otp/security/advisories/GHSA-c99q-jmpx-v8qq">
	  <p>Erlang/OTP's public_key application contains a
	  path-validation flaw where non-CA certificates lacking
	  keyUsage extensions can be accepted as intermediate issuers.
	  An attacker with an end-entity certificate issued by a
	  trusted CA can exploit this to forge arbitrary leaf
	  certificates, allowing public_key:pkix_path_validation/3 to
	  validate fraudulent certificate chains and potentially
	  compromise systems relying on SSL/TLS validation.</p>
	</blockquote>
      </body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-42789</cvename>
      <url>https://github.com/erlang/otp/security/advisories/GHSA-c99q-jmpx-v8qq</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-05-27</discovery>
      <entry>2026-05-28</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="9357d6fb-5a54-11f1-b886-4c526214c986">
    <topic>Erlang/OTP -- OCSP responder certificate accepted after expiry in public_key</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
	<name>erlang-runtime27</name>
	<range><lt>27.3.4.12</lt></range>
      </package>
      <package>
	<name>erlang-runtime28</name>
	<range><lt>28.5.0.1</lt></range>
      </package>
      <package>
	<name>erlang-runtime29</name>
	<range><lt>29.0.1</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>https://github.com/erlang/otp/security/advisories/GHSA-cjxj-wj6x-3fff reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://github.com/erlang/otp/security/advisories/GHSA-cjxj-wj6x-3fff">
	  <p>Erlang/OTP's public_key application fails to validate the
	  validity period of OCSP responder certificates during
	  response verification. An attacker possessing an expired
	  OCSP responder's private key can forge responses that the
	  system accepts as valid, potentially allowing acceptance of
	  revoked TLS certificates in OCSP stapling scenarios or
	  authentication bypass in applications using the
	  public_key:pkix_ocsp_validate/5 API directly.</p>
	</blockquote>
      </body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-42791</cvename>
      <url>https://github.com/erlang/otp/security/advisories/GHSA-cjxj-wj6x-3fff</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-05-27</discovery>
      <entry>2026-05-28</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="9bcc3279-5901-11f1-b525-3c7c3fba4204">
    <topic>Grafana -- Grafana MSSQL Data Source Plugin: Restriction Bypass Leading to OOM DoS</topic>
    <affects>
    <package>
	<name>grafana</name>
	<range><ge>11.6.0</ge><lt>11.6.14</lt></range>
	<range><ge>12.1.0</ge><lt>12.1.10</lt></range>
	<range><ge>12.2.0</ge><lt>12.2.8</lt></range>
	<range><ge>12.3.0</ge><lt>12.3.6</lt></range>
	<range><ge>12.4.0</ge><lt>12.4.2</lt></range>
    </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>https://grafana.com/security/security-advisories/cve-2026-33375 reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://grafana.com/security/security-advisories/cve-2026-33375">
	  <p>The Grafana MSSQL data source plugin contains a logic flaw that
	  allows a low-privileged user (Viewer) to bypass API restrictions
	  and trigger a catastrophic Out-Of-Memory (OOM) memory exhaustion,
	  crashing the host container.</p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-33375</cvename>
      <url>https://cveawg.mitre.org/api/cve/CVE-2026-33375</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-03-26</discovery>
      <entry>2026-05-26</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="62717c0f-5901-11f1-b525-3c7c3fba4204">
    <topic>Grafana -- Grafana Testdata datasource can issue unbounded memory allocations</topic>
    <affects>
    <package>
	<name>grafana</name>
	<range><ge>8.1.0</ge><lt>11.6.14</lt></range>
	<range><ge>12.0.0</ge><lt>12.1.10</lt></range>
	<range><ge>12.2.0</ge><lt>12.2.8</lt></range>
	<range><ge>12.3.0</ge><lt>12.3.6</lt></range>
	<range><ge>12.4.0</ge><lt>12.4.2</lt></range>
    </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>https://grafana.com/security/security-advisories/cve-2026-28375 reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://grafana.com/security/security-advisories/cve-2026-28375">
	  <p>A testdata data-source can be used to trigger out-of-memory crashes in Grafana.</p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-28375</cvename>
      <url>https://cveawg.mitre.org/api/cve/CVE-2026-28375</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-03-27</discovery>
      <entry>2026-05-26</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="138319f3-5901-11f1-b525-3c7c3fba4204">
    <topic>Grafana -- OpenFeature evaluation API reads input data with no bounds</topic>
    <affects>
    <package>
	<name>grafana</name>
	<range><ge>12.1.0</ge><lt>12.1.10</lt></range>
	<range><ge>12.2.0</ge><lt>12.2.8</lt></range>
	<range><ge>12.3.0</ge><lt>12.3.6</lt></range>
	<range><ge>12.4.0</ge><lt>12.4.2</lt></range>
    </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>https://grafana.com/security/security-advisories/cve-2026-27880 reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://grafana.com/security/security-advisories/cve-2026-27880">
	  <p>The OpenFeature feature toggle evaluation endpoint reads unbounded
	  values into memory, which can cause out-of-memory crashes.</p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-27880</cvename>
      <url>https://cveawg.mitre.org/api/cve/CVE-2026-27880</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-03-27</discovery>
      <entry>2026-05-26</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="c079e809-5900-11f1-b525-3c7c3fba4204">
    <topic>Grafana -- Query resampling can cause unbounded memory allocations</topic>
    <affects>
    <package>
	<name>grafana</name>
	<range><ge>8.0.0</ge><lt>11.6.14</lt></range>
	<range><ge>12.0.0</ge><lt>12.1.10</lt></range>
	<range><ge>12.2.0</ge><lt>12.2.8</lt></range>
	<range><ge>12.3.0</ge><lt>12.3.6</lt></range>
	<range><ge>12.4.0</ge><lt>12.4.2</lt></range>
    </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>https://grafana.com/security/security-advisories/cve-2026-27879 reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://grafana.com/security/security-advisories/cve-2026-27879">
	  <p>A resample query can be used to trigger out-of-memory crashes in Grafana.</p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-27879</cvename>
      <url>https://cveawg.mitre.org/api/cve/CVE-2026-27879</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-03-27</discovery>
      <entry>2026-05-26</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="6b2bf8e9-5900-11f1-b525-3c7c3fba4204">
    <topic>Grafana -- Public dashboards discloses all direct mode datasources</topic>
    <affects>
    <package>
	<name>grafana</name>
	<range><ge>9.3.0</ge><lt>11.6.14</lt></range>
	<range><ge>12.0.0</ge><lt>12.1.10</lt></range>
	<range><ge>12.2.0</ge><lt>12.2.8</lt></range>
	<range><ge>12.3.0</ge><lt>12.3.6</lt></range>
	<range><ge>12.4.0</ge><lt>12.4.2</lt></range>
    </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>https://grafana.com/security/security-advisories/cve-2026-27877 reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://grafana.com/security/security-advisories/cve-2026-27877">
	  <p>When using public dashboards and direct data-sources, all direct
	  data-sources' passwords are exposed despite not being used in dashboards.

	  No passwords of proxied data-sources are exposed.  We encourage all
	  direct data-sources to be converted to proxied data-sources as far
	  as possible to improve your deployments' security.</p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-27877</cvename>
      <url>https://cveawg.mitre.org/api/cve/CVE-2026-27877</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-03-27</discovery>
      <entry>2026-05-26</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="f45ad940-58ff-11f1-b525-3c7c3fba4204">
    <topic>Grafana -- RCE on Grafana via sqlExpressions</topic>
    <affects>
    <package>
	<name>grafana</name>
	<range><ge>11.6.0</ge><lt>11.6.14</lt></range>
	<range><ge>12.0.0</ge><lt>12.1.10</lt></range>
	<range><ge>12.2.0</ge><lt>12.2.8</lt></range>
	<range><ge>12.3.0</ge><lt>12.3.6</lt></range>
	<range><ge>12.4.0</ge><lt>12.4.2</lt></range>
    </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>https://grafana.com/security/security-advisories/cve-2026-27876 reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://grafana.com/security/security-advisories/cve-2026-27876">
	  <p>A chained attack via SQL Expressions and a Grafana Enterprise plugin
	  can lead to a remote arbitrary code execution impact (RCE).  This
	  is enabled by a feature in Grafana (OSS), so all users are always
	  recommended to update to avoid future attack vectors going this
	  path.

	  Only instances with the sqlExpressions feature toggle enabled are
	  vulnerable.</p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-27876</cvename>
      <url>https://cveawg.mitre.org/api/cve/CVE-2026-27876</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-03-27</discovery>
      <entry>2026-05-26</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="83cd53f7-58ff-11f1-b525-3c7c3fba4204">
    <topic>Grafana -- Public Dashboards time range restriction on annotations can be bypassed</topic>
    <affects>
    <package>
	<name>grafana</name>
	<range><ge>9.3.0</ge><lt>11.6.10</lt></range>
	<range><ge>12.0.0</ge><lt>12.1.6</lt></range>
	<range><ge>12.2.0</ge><lt>12.2.4</lt></range>
	<range><ge>12.3.0</ge><lt>12.3.2</lt></range>
    </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>https://grafana.com/security/security-advisories/cve-2026-21722 reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://grafana.com/security/security-advisories/cve-2026-21722">
	  <p>Public dashboards with annotations enabled did not limit their
	  annotation timerange to the locked timerange of the public dashboard.
	  This means one could read the entire history of annotations visible
	  on the specific dashboard, even those outside the locked timerange.

	  This did not leak any annotations that would not otherwise be visible
	  on the public dashboard.</p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-21722</cvename>
      <url>https://cveawg.mitre.org/api/cve/CVE-2026-21722</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-02-12</discovery>
      <entry>2026-05-26</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="6cc28c49-58fe-11f1-b525-3c7c3fba4204">
    <topic>Grafana -- XSS in Grafana Explore stack trace</topic>
    <affects>
    <package>
	<name>grafana</name>
	<range><ge>12.2.0</ge><lt>12.2.4</lt></range>
	<range><ge>12.3.0</ge><lt>12.3.2</lt></range>
    </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>https://grafana.com/security/security-advisories/cve-2025-41117 reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://grafana.com/security/security-advisories/cve-2025-41117">
	  <p>Stack traces in Grafana's Explore Traces view can be rendered as
	  raw HTML, and thus inject malicious JavaScript in the browser.  This
	  would require malicious JavaScript to be entered into the stack
	  trace field.

	  Only datasources with the Jaeger HTTP API appear to be affected;
	  Jaeger gRPC and Tempo do not appear affected whatsoever.</p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2025-41117</cvename>
      <url>https://cveawg.mitre.org/api/cve/CVE-2025-41117</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-02-12</discovery>
      <entry>2026-05-26</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="87ff1d7e-6b24-4a5b-9825-90dcda5ee119">
    <topic>jellyfin -- multiple vulnerabilities</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
	<name>jellyfin</name>
	<range><lt>10.11.10</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>The Jellyfin project reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://github.com/jellyfin/jellyfin/releases/tag/v10.11.10">
	  <p>Jellyfin Server 10.11.10 fixes three security vulnerabilities:</p>
	  <ul>
	    <li>GHSA-f47c-m7gr-q92j: (details pending disclosure)</li>
	    <li>GHSA-jg92-mrxq-vv75: (details pending disclosure)</li>
	    <li>GHSA-wwwm-px48-fpvq: (details pending disclosure)</li>
	  </ul>
	</blockquote>
      </body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <url>https://github.com/jellyfin/jellyfin/security/advisories/GHSA-f47c-m7gr-q92j</url>
      <url>https://github.com/jellyfin/jellyfin/security/advisories/GHSA-jg92-mrxq-vv75</url>
      <url>https://github.com/jellyfin/jellyfin/security/advisories/GHSA-wwwm-px48-fpvq</url>
      <url>https://github.com/jellyfin/jellyfin/releases/tag/v10.11.10</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-05-24</discovery>
      <entry>2026-05-25</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="b8777bc2-5758-11f1-8607-8447094a420f">
    <topic>Roundcube Webmail -- Multiple vulnerabilities</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
	<name>roundcube-php82</name>
	<name>roundcube-php83</name>
	<name>roundcube-php84</name>
	<name>roundcube-php85</name>
	<range><lt>1.6.16,1</lt></range>
	<range><ge>1.7.0,1</ge><lt>1.7.1,1</lt></range>
	</package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>The Roundcube Webmail project reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://roundcube.net/news/2026/05/24/security-updates-1.6.16-and-1.7.1">
	  <p>See link for details. No CVE numbers available at the moment.</p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <url>https://roundcube.net/news/2026/05/24/security-updates-1.6.16-and-1.7.1</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-05-24</discovery>
      <entry>2026-05-24</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="4e221ca1-573a-11f1-9f6d-5404a68ad561">
    <topic>traefik -- Unauthorized exposure of the REST provider</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
       <name>traefik</name>
       <range><lt>3.7.1</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
       <p>The traefik project releases a new version addressing a CVE:</p>
       <blockquote cite="https://github.com/traefik/traefik/releases/tag/v3.7.1">
       <ul>
       <li>CVE-2026-44774 (Gateway API TraefikService backend accepts rest@internal, allowing unauthorized exposure of the REST provider)</li>
       </ul>
       </blockquote>
      </body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-44774</cvename>
      <url>https://github.com/traefik/traefik/releases/tag/v3.7.1</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-05-15</discovery>
      <entry>2026-05-24</entry>
    </dates>
 </vuln>

  <vuln vid="36a3131d-5600-11f1-b339-3497f65b111b">
    <topic>nginx -- heap buffer overflow in ngx_http_rewrite_module</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
       <name>nginx</name>
       <range><ge>0.1.17,3</ge><lt>1.30.2_2,3</lt></range>
       <range><ge>1.31.0,3</ge><lt>1.31.1,3</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
       <p>The nginx developers report:</p>
       <blockquote cite="https://nginx.org/en/CHANGES">
       <p>
       A heap memory buffer overflow might occur in a worker process
       when using a configuration with overlapping captures in
       ngx_http_rewrite_module, potentially resulting in arbitrary
       code execution (CVE-2026-9256).
       </p>
      </blockquote>
     </body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-9256</cvename>
      <url>https://nginx.org/en/CHANGES</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-05-22</discovery>
      <entry>2026-05-22</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="5f7c686c-558e-11f1-b38d-9be2e6022e28">
    <topic>putty -- multiple security vulnerabilities</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
	<name>putty</name> <range><lt>0.84</lt></range>
      </package>
      <package>
	<name>putty-nogtk</name> <range><lt>0.84</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>Simon Tatham reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~sgtatham/putty/changes.html">
	  <p>These features are new in PuTTY 0.84:</p>
	  <ul>
	    <li>Security issue: fixed a remotely triggerable double-free in RSA key exchange. (We don't know of any way it is exploitable to execute code.)</li>
	    <li>Minor security issue: fixed a remotely triggerable crash in NIST ECDSA signature verification. (An assertion failure – definitely not exploitable to execute code.)</li>
	    <li>Minor security issue: fixed marking of Telnet and Rlogin session data with a trust sigil after you authenticated to a proxy (possibly allowing a server to spoof a repeat proxy password prompt).</li>
	  </ul>
	</blockquote>
      </body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <url>https://lists.tartarus.org/pipermail/putty-announce/2026/000042.html</url>
      <url>https://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~sgtatham/putty/changes.html</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-05-22</discovery>
      <entry>2026-05-22</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="ea4c5b9d-55f7-11f1-915c-8974b59277b5">
    <topic>gstreamer1 -- multiple vulnerabilities</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
	<name>gstreamer1</name>
	<range><lt>1.28.3</lt></range>
      </package>
      <package>
	<name>gstreamer1-plugins</name>
	<range><lt>1.28.3</lt></range>
      </package>
      <package>
	<name>gstreamer1-plugins-base</name>
	<range><lt>1.28.3</lt></range>
      </package>
      <package>
	<name>gstreamer1-plugins-good</name>
	<range><lt>1.28.3</lt></range>
      </package>
      <package>
	<name>gstreamer1-plugins-bad</name>
	<range><lt>1.28.3</lt></range>
      </package>
      <package>
	<name>gstreamer1-plugins-ugly</name>
	<range><lt>1.28.3</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
      <p>The GStreamer project reports multiple security vulnerabilities fixed in the 1.28.3 release:</p>
      <blockquote cite="https://gstreamer.freedesktop.org/security/">
	<p>Six security vulnerabilities were addressed, including:</p>
	<ul>
	  <li>Bounds check errors in MXF VANC packet handling.</li>
	  <li>Use-after-free in GStreamer core buffer value deserialization.</li>
	  <li>Out-of-bounds read in MXF demuxer temporal offset check.</li>
	  <li>Out-of-bounds write in H.266/VVC parser when parsing PPS tile slices.</li>
	  <li>Insufficient validation in MOV/MP4 demuxer uncompressed video handling.</li>
	  <li>Out-of-bounds reads in MPEG PS PES header parsing.</li>
	</ul>
	<p>These could lead to application crashes, memory corruption, or potentially arbitrary code execution.</p>
      </blockquote>
      </body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <url>https://gstreamer.freedesktop.org/security/sa-2026-0024.html</url>
      <url>https://gstreamer.freedesktop.org/security/sa-2026-0025.html</url>
      <url>https://gstreamer.freedesktop.org/security/sa-2026-0026.html</url>
      <url>https://gstreamer.freedesktop.org/security/sa-2026-0027.html</url>
      <url>https://gstreamer.freedesktop.org/security/sa-2026-0028.html</url>
      <url>https://gstreamer.freedesktop.org/security/sa-2026-0029.html</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-05-11</discovery>
      <entry>2026-05-22</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="05aadfcc-55f5-11f1-915c-8974b59277b5">
    <topic>gstreamer1 -- multiple vulnerabilities</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
	<name>gstreamer1</name>
	<range><lt>1.28.2</lt></range>
      </package>
      <package>
	<name>gstreamer1-plugins</name>
	<range><lt>1.28.2</lt></range>
      </package>
      <package>
	<name>gstreamer1-plugins-base</name>
	<range><lt>1.28.2</lt></range>
      </package>
      <package>
	<name>gstreamer1-plugins-good</name>
	<range><lt>1.28.2</lt></range>
      </package>
      <package>
	<name>gstreamer1-plugins-bad</name>
	<range><lt>1.28.2</lt></range>
      </package>
      <package>
	<name>gstreamer1-plugins-ugly</name>
	<range><lt>1.28.2</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
      <p>The GStreamer project reports multiple security vulnerabilities fixed in the 1.28.2 release:</p>
      <blockquote cite="https://gstreamer.freedesktop.org/security/">
	<p>Several security vulnerabilities were addressed, including:</p>
	<ul>
	  <li>H.264 video parser NULL pointer dereference when freeing SPS/MVC data.</li>
	  <li>Integer overflows in the AV1 LEB128 parser, H.266/VVC video parser, and WAV parser cue handling.</li>
	  <li>Heap buffer overflow in the Matroska demuxer.</li>
	  <li>Assertion failures in the FLV demuxer on corrupted streams.</li>
	  <li>NULL-pointer dereferences in the mDVDsub subtitle parser.</li>
	  <li>Multiple out-of-bounds reads and writes in the MOV/MP4 demuxer audio channel layout parsing.</li>
	  <li>Denial of service in SRT/WebVTT parser</li>
	</ul>
	<p>These could lead to application crashes, memory exhaustion, or potentially arbitrary code execution.</p>
	</blockquote>
      </body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-5056</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-39043</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-39044</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-46469</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-46470</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-46472</cvename>
      <url>https://gstreamer.freedesktop.org/security/sa-2026-0013.html</url>
      <url>https://gstreamer.freedesktop.org/security/sa-2026-0014.html</url>
      <url>https://gstreamer.freedesktop.org/security/sa-2026-0015.html</url>
      <url>https://gstreamer.freedesktop.org/security/sa-2026-0017.html</url>
      <url>https://gstreamer.freedesktop.org/security/sa-2026-0018.html</url>
      <url>https://gstreamer.freedesktop.org/security/sa-2026-0019.html</url>
      <url>https://gstreamer.freedesktop.org/security/sa-2026-0020.html</url>
      <url>https://gstreamer.freedesktop.org/security/sa-2026-0021.html</url>
      <url>https://gstreamer.freedesktop.org/security/sa-2026-0022.html</url>
      <url>https://gstreamer.freedesktop.org/security/sa-2026-0023.html</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-04-07</discovery>
      <entry>2026-05-22</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="738f5590-550c-11f1-9f97-3fa0ea3edd7d">
    <topic>qt6-webengine -- multiple vulnerabilities</topic>
    <affects>
<package>
<name>qt6-pdf</name>
<name>qt6-webengine</name>
<range><lt>6.11.1</lt></range>
</package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>Qt qtwebengine-chromium repo reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://code.qt.io/cgit/qt/qtwebengine-chromium.git/log/?h=140-based">
	  <p>Backports for 262 security bugs in Chromium:</p>
	  <ul>
	    <li>CVE-2025-13223: Type Confusion in V8</li>
	    <li>CVE-2025-13224: Type Confusion in V8</li>
	    <li>CVE-2025-13630: Type Confusion in V8</li>
	    <li>CVE-2025-13632: Inappropriate implementation in DevTools</li>
	    <li>CVE-2025-13634: Inappropriate implementation in Downloads</li>
	    <li>CVE-2025-13721: Race in v8</li>
	    <li>CVE-2025-14766: Out of bounds read and write in V8</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-0628: Insufficient policy enforcement in WebView tag</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-0899: Out of bounds memory access in V8</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-0902: Inappropriate implementation in V8</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-0905: Insufficient policy enforcement in Network</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-1220: Description pending NVD publication</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-1861: Heap buffer overflow in libvpx</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-2314: Heap buffer overflow in Codecs</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-2315: Inappropriate implementation in WebGPU</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-2316: Insufficient policy enforcement in Frames</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-2317: Inappropriate implementation in Animation</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-2319: Race in DevTools</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-2320: Inappropriate implementation in File input</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-2441: Use after free in CSS</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-2648: Heap buffer overflow in PDFium</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-2649: Integer overflow in V8</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-2650: Heap buffer overflow in Media</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-3061: Out of bounds read in Media</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-3062: Out of bounds read and write in Tint</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-3063: Inappropriate implementation in DevTools</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-3536: Integer overflow in ANGLE</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-3537: Object lifecycle issue in PowerVR</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-3538: Integer overflow in Skia</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-3539: Object lifecycle issue in DevTools</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-3540: Inappropriate implementation in WebAudio</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-3541: Inappropriate implementation in CSS</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-3542: Inappropriate implementation in WebAssembly</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-3543: Inappropriate implementation in V8</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-3544: Heap buffer overflow in WebCodecs</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-3545: Insufficient data validation in Navigation</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-3909: Out of bounds write in Skia</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-3910: Inappropriate implementation in V8</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-3919: Use after free in Extensions</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-3921: Use after free in TextEncoding</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-3922: Use after free in MediaStream</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-3923: Use after free in WebMIDI</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-3924: use after free in WindowDialog</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-3926: Out of bounds read in V8</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-3929: Side-channel information leakage in ResourceTiming</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-3931: Heap buffer overflow in Skia</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-3934: Insufficient policy enforcement in ChromeDriver</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-3938: Insufficient policy enforcement in Clipboard</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-3940: Insufficient policy enforcement in DevTools</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-3941: Insufficient policy enforcement in DevTools</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-3942: Incorrect security UI in PictureInPicture</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-4440: Out of bounds read and write in WebGL</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-4441: Use after free in Base</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-4442: Heap buffer overflow in CSS</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-4443: Heap buffer overflow in WebAudio</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-4444: Stack buffer overflow in WebRTC</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-4445: Use after free in WebRTC</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-4446: Use after free in WebRTC</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-4448: Heap buffer overflow in ANGLE</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-4449: Use after free in Blink</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-4450: Out of bounds write in V8</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-4451: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Navigation</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-4452: Integer overflow in ANGLE</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-4453: Integer overflow in Dawn</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-4454: Use after free in Network</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-4455: Heap buffer overflow in PDFium</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-4457: Type Confusion in V8</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-4458: Use after free in Extensions</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-4459: Out of bounds read and write in WebAudio</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-4460: Out of bounds read in Skia</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-4462: Out of bounds read in Blink</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-4463: Heap buffer overflow in WebRTC</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-4464: Integer overflow in ANGLE</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-4674: Out of bounds read in CSS</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-4675: Heap buffer overflow in WebGL</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-4677: Out of bounds read in WebAudio</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-4679: Integer overflow in Fonts</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-5272: Heap buffer overflow in GPU</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-5273: Use after free in CSS</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-5274: Integer overflow in Codecs</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-5275: Heap buffer overflow in ANGLE</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-5276: Insufficient policy enforcement in WebUSB</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-5277: Integer overflow in ANGLE</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-5279: Object corruption in V8</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-5280: Use after free in WebCodecs</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-5281: Use after free in Dawn</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-5282: Out of bounds read in WebCodecs</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-5283: Inappropriate implementation in ANGLE</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-5284: Use after free in Dawn</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-5285: Use after free in WebGL</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-5287: Use after free in PDF</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-5289: Use after free in Navigation</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-5290: Use after free in Compositing</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-5291: Inappropriate implementation in WebGL</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-5292: Out of bounds read in WebCodecs</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-5860: Use after free in WebRTC</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-5861: Use after free in V8</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-5862: Inappropriate implementation in V8</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-5863: Inappropriate implementation in V8</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-5865: Type Confusion in V8</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-5866: Use after free in Media</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-5868: Heap buffer overflow in ANGLE</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-5870: Integer overflow in Skia</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-5871: Type Confusion in V8</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-5872: Use after free in Blink</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-5873: Out of bounds read and write in V8</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-5875: Policy bypass in Blink</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-5876: Side-channel information leakage in Navigation</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-5877: Use after free in Navigation</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-5878: Incorrect security UI in Blink</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-5879: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in ANGLE</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-5880: Incorrect security UI in browser UI</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-5882: Incorrect security UI in Fullscreen</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-5883: Use after free in Media</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-5884: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Media</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-5885: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in WebML</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-5886: Out of bounds read in WebAudio</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-5888: Uninitialized Use in WebCodecs</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-5889: Cryptographic Flaw in PDFium</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-5890: Race in WebCodecs</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-5891: Insufficient policy enforcement in browser UI</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-5893: Race in V8</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-5894: Inappropriate implementation in PDF</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-5896: Policy bypass in Audio</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-5899: Incorrect security UI in History Navigation</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-5900: Policy bypass in Downloads</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-5901: Policy bypass in DevTools</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-5903: Policy bypass in IFrameSandbox</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-5904: Use after free in V8</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-5907: Insufficient data validation in Media</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-5908: Integer overflow in Media</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-5909: Integer overflow in Media</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-5910: Integer overflow in Media</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-5911: Policy bypass in ServiceWorkers</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-5912: Integer overflow in WebRTC</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-5913: Out of bounds read in Blink</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-5914: Type Confusion in CSS</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-5915: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in WebML</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-5918: Inappropriate implementation in Navigation</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-5919: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in WebSockets</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-6296: Heap buffer overflow in ANGLE</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-6297: Use after free in Proxy</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-6298: Heap buffer overflow in Skia</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-6299: Use after free in Prerender</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-6300: Use after free in CSS</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-6301: Type Confusion in Turbofan</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-6302: Use after free in Video</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-6303: Use after free in Codecs</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-6304: Use after free in Graphite</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-6305: Heap buffer overflow in PDFium</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-6306: Heap buffer overflow in PDFium</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-6307: Type Confusion in Turbofan</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-6308: Out of bounds read in Media</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-6309: Use after free in Viz</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-6311: Uninitialized Use in Accessibility</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-6312: Insufficient policy enforcement in Passwords</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-6313: Insufficient policy enforcement in CORS</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-6314: Out of bounds write in GPU</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-6316: Use after free in Forms</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-6359: Use after free in Video</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-6360: Use after free in FileSystem</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-6361: Heap buffer overflow in PDFium</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-6362: Use after free in Codecs</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-6363: Type Confusion in V8</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-6364: Out of bounds read in Skia</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-6919: Use after free in DevTools</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-6920: Out of bounds read in GPU</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-7333: Use after free in GPU</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-7335: Use after free in media</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-7336: Use after free in WebRTC</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-7339: Heap buffer overflow in WebRTC</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-7340: Integer overflow in ANGLE</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-7341: Use after free in WebRTC</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-7342: Use after free in WebView</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-7343: Use after free in Views</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-7344: Use after free in Accessibility</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-7345: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Feedback</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-7346: Inappropriate implementation in Tint</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-7348: Use after free in Codecs</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-7349: Use after free in Cast</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-7350: Use after free in WebMIDI</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-7351: Race in MHTML</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-7353: Heap buffer overflow in Skia</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-7354: Out of bounds read and write in Angle</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-7355: Use after free in Media</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-7356: Use after free in Navigation</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-7357: Use after free in GPU</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-7359: Use after free in ANGLE</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-7360: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Compositing</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-7363: Use after free in Canvas</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-7899: Out of bounds read and write in V8</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-7900: Heap buffer overflow in ANGLE</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-7901: Use after free in ANGLE</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-7902: Out of bounds memory access in V8</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-7903: Integer overflow in ANGLE</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-7904: Out of bounds read in Fonts</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-7906: Use after free in SVG</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-7907: Use after free in DOM</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-7908: Use after free in Fullscreen</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-7910: Use after free in Views</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-7912: Integer overflow in GPU</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-7914: Type Confusion in Accessibility</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-7916: Insufficient data validation in InterestGroups</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-7917: Use after free in Fullscreen</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-7918: Use after free in GPU</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-7919: Use after free in Aura</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-7920: Use after free in Skia</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-7921: Use after free in Passwords</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-7922: Use after free in ServiceWorker</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-7923: Out of bounds write in Skia</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-7924: Uninitialized Use in Dawn</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-7926: Use after free in PresentationAPI</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-7927: Type Confusion in Runtime</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-7929: Use after free in MediaRecording</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-7933: Out of bounds read in WebCodecs</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-7935: Inappropriate implementation in Speech</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-7937: Insufficient policy enforcement in DevTools</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-7938: Use after free in CSS</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-7940: Use after free in V8</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-7942: Integer overflow in ANGLE</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-7944: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Persistent Cache</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-7945: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in COOP</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-7946: Insufficient policy enforcement in WebUI</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-7947: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Network</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-7949: Out of bounds read in Skia</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-7950: Out of bounds read and write in GFX</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-7951: Out of bounds write in WebRTC</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-7954: Race in Shared Storage</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-7955: Uninitialized Use in GPU</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-7956: Use after free in Navigation</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-7957: Out of bounds write in Media</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-7959: Inappropriate implementation in Navigation</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-7963: Inappropriate implementation in ServiceWorker</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-7964: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in FileSystem</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-7965: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in DevTools</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-7967: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Navigation</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-7968: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in CORS</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-7969: Integer overflow in Network</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-7971: Inappropriate implementation in ORB</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-7972: Uninitialized Use in GPU</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-7973: Integer overflow in Dawn</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-7974: Use after free in Blink</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-7975: Use after free in DevTools</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-7976: Use after free in Views</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-7977: Inappropriate implementation in Canvas</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-7980: Use after free in WebAudio</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-7982: Uninitialized Use in WebCodecs</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-7983: Out of bounds read in Dawn</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-7985: Use after free in GPU</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-7986: Insufficient policy enforcement in Autofill</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-7987: Use after free in WebRTC</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-7988: Type Confusion in WebRTC</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-7989: Insufficient data validation in DataTransfer</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-7991: Use after free in UI</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-7993: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Payments</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-7996: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in SSL</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-7998: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Dialog</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-7999: Inappropriate implementation in V8</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-8002: Use after free in Audio</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-8003: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in TabGroups</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-8004: Insufficient policy enforcement in DevTools</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-8007: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Cast</li>
	  </ul>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2025-13223</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2025-13224</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2025-13630</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2025-13632</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2025-13634</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2025-13721</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2025-14766</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-0628</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-0899</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-0902</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-0905</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-1220</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-1861</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-2314</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-2315</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-2316</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-2317</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-2319</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-2320</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-2441</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-2648</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-2649</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-2650</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-3061</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-3062</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-3063</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-3536</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-3537</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-3538</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-3539</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-3540</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-3541</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-3542</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-3543</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-3544</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-3545</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-3909</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-3910</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-3919</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-3921</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-3922</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-3923</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-3924</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-3926</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-3929</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-3931</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-3934</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-3938</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-3940</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-3941</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-3942</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-4440</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-4441</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-4442</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-4443</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-4444</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-4445</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-4446</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-4448</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-4449</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-4450</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-4451</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-4452</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-4453</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-4454</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-4455</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-4457</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-4458</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-4459</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-4460</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-4462</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-4463</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-4464</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-4674</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-4675</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-4677</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-4679</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-5272</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-5273</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-5274</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-5275</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-5276</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-5277</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-5279</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-5280</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-5281</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-5282</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-5283</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-5284</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-5285</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-5287</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-5289</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-5290</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-5291</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-5292</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-5860</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-5861</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-5862</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-5863</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-5865</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-5866</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-5868</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-5870</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-5871</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-5872</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-5873</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-5875</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-5876</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-5877</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-5878</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-5879</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-5880</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-5882</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-5883</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-5884</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-5885</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-5886</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-5888</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-5889</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-5890</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-5891</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-5893</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-5894</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-5896</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-5899</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-5900</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-5901</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-5903</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-5904</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-5907</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-5908</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-5909</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-5910</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-5911</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-5912</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-5913</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-5914</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-5915</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-5918</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-5919</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-6296</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-6297</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-6298</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-6299</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-6300</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-6301</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-6302</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-6303</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-6304</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-6305</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-6306</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-6307</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-6308</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-6309</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-6311</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-6312</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-6313</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-6314</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-6316</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-6359</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-6360</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-6361</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-6362</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-6363</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-6364</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-6919</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-6920</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-7333</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-7335</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-7336</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-7339</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-7340</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-7341</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-7342</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-7343</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-7344</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-7345</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-7346</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-7348</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-7349</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-7350</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-7351</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-7353</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-7354</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-7355</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-7356</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-7357</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-7359</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-7360</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-7363</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-7899</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-7900</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-7901</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-7902</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-7903</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-7904</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-7906</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-7907</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-7908</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-7910</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-7912</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-7914</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-7916</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-7917</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-7918</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-7919</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-7920</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-7921</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-7922</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-7923</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-7924</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-7926</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-7927</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-7929</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-7933</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-7935</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-7937</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-7938</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-7940</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-7942</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-7944</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-7945</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-7946</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-7947</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-7949</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-7950</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-7951</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-7954</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-7955</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-7956</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-7957</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-7959</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-7963</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-7964</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-7965</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-7967</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-7968</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-7969</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-7971</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-7972</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-7973</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-7974</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-7975</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-7976</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-7977</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-7980</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-7982</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-7983</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-7985</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-7986</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-7987</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-7988</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-7989</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-7991</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-7993</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-7996</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-7998</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-7999</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-8002</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-8003</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-8004</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-8007</cvename>
      <url>https://code.qt.io/cgit/qt/qtwebengine-chromium.git/log/?h=140-based</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-01-29</discovery>
      <entry>2026-05-21</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="ecca89eb-54e6-11f1-bc4a-40b034429ecf">
    <topic>net/rsync -- multiple vulnerabilities</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
    <name>rsync</name>
    <range><lt>3.4.3</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>The rsync project reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://download.samba.org/pub/rsync/NEWS#3.4.3">
	  <p>Six CVEs are fixed in this release. All six are assigned by VulnCheck as CNA.
	    Affected versions are 3.4.2 and earlier in every case.</p>
	  <p>In addition to the six CVE fixes, this release adds defence-in-depth
	    hardening on several adjacent paths: bounded wire-supplied counts and
	    lengths in flist/io/acls/xattrs, a guard against length underflow in
	    cumulative snprintf() callers, a parent block-index bounds check on the
	    receiver, a NULL check in read_delay_line(), a lower ceiling on
	    MAX_WIRE_DEL_STAT to avoid signed-int overflow in the read_del_stats()
	    accumulator, rejection of hyphen-prefixed remote-shell hostnames
	    (defence-in-depth against argv-injection in tooling that forwards untrusted
	    input into the hostspec position; reported by Aisle Research via Michal
	    Ruprich), and a NULL-check on localtime_r() in timestring() to keep a
	    malicious server from crashing the client by advertising a file with an
	    out-of-range modtime.</p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-29518</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-43617</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-43618</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-43619</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-43620</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-45232</cvename>
      <url>https://download.samba.org/pub/rsync/NEWS#3.4.3</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-05-20</discovery>
      <entry>2026-05-21</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="37ab0cbc-54b7-11f1-8d7a-bc241121aa0a">
    <topic>FreeBSD -- Incorrect libcap_net limitation list manipulation</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
	<name>FreeBSD</name>
	<range><ge>15.0</ge><lt>15.0_9</lt></range>
	<range><ge>14.4</ge><lt>14.4_5</lt></range>
	<range><ge>14.3</ge><lt>14.3_14</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<h1>Problem Description:</h1>
	  <p>In the case of the cap_net service, when a key present in the
	  old limit was omitted from the new limit, the missing key was treated
	  as "allow any" instead of being rejected.</p>
	<h1>Impact:</h1>
	  <p>In certain scenarios, an application that had previously
	  restricted a subset of network operations could ask for a new limit
	  that extended the permissions of the process.</p>
      </body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-45254</cvename>
      <freebsdsa>SA-26:24.cap_net</freebsdsa>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-05-20</discovery>
      <entry>2026-05-21</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="039c0ab0-54b7-11f1-8d7a-bc241121aa0a">
    <topic>FreeBSD -- Remote code execution via installer Wi-Fi access point scans</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
	<name>FreeBSD</name>
	<range><ge>15.0</ge><lt>15.0_9</lt></range>
	<range><ge>14.4</ge><lt>14.4_5</lt></range>
	<range><ge>14.3</ge><lt>14.3_14</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<h1>Problem Description:</h1>
	  <p>When bsdinstall or bsdconfig are prompted to scan for nearby
	  Wi-Fi networks, they build up a list of network names and use
	  bsddialog(1) to prompt the user to select a network.  This is
	  implemented using a shell script, and the code which handled network
	  names was not careful to prevent expansion by the shell.  As a
	  result, a suitably crafted network name can be used to execute
	  commands via a subshell.</p>
	<h1>Impact:</h1>
	  <p>The problem can be exploited to execute code as root on the
	  system running bsdinstall or bsdconfig.  The attacker would need
	  to create an access point with a specially crafted name and be
	  within range of a Wi-Fi scan.  Note that bsdinstall and bsdconfig
	  are vulnerable as soon as the user prompts them to scan for nearby
	  networks; they do not need to actually select the malicious
	  network.</p>
      </body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-45255</cvename>
      <freebsdsa>SA-26:23.bsdinstall</freebsdsa>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-05-20</discovery>
      <entry>2026-05-21</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="90fe1784-54b6-11f1-8d7a-bc241121aa0a">
    <topic>FreeBSD -- select(2) file descriptor set overflow causes stack overflow</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
	<name>FreeBSD</name>
	<range><ge>15.0</ge><lt>15.0_9</lt></range>
	<range><ge>14.4</ge><lt>14.4_5</lt></range>
	<range><ge>14.3</ge><lt>14.3_14</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<h1>Problem Description:</h1>
	  <p>libcasper(3) communicates with helper processes via UNIX domain
	  sockets, and uses the select(2) system call to wait for data to
	  become available.  However, it does not verify that its socket
	  descriptor fits within select(2)'s descriptor set size limit of
	  FD_SETSIZE (1024).</p>
	<h1>Impact:</h1>
	  <p>An attacker able to cause an application using libcasper(3) to
	  allocate large file descriptors, e.g., by opening many descriptors
	  and executing a program which is not careful to close them upon
	  startup, may trigger stack corruption.  If the target application
	  runs with setuid root privileges, this could be used to escalate
	  local privileges.</p>
      </body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-39461</cvename>
      <freebsdsa>SA-26:22.libcasper</freebsdsa>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-05-20</discovery>
      <entry>2026-05-21</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="6c96da5e-54b6-11f1-8d7a-bc241121aa0a">
    <topic>FreeBSD -- Missing validation in ptrace(PT_SC_REMOTE)</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
	<name>FreeBSD-kernel</name>
	<range><ge>15.0</ge><lt>15.0_9</lt></range>
	<range><ge>14.4</ge><lt>14.4_5</lt></range>
	<range><ge>14.3</ge><lt>14.3_14</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<h1>Problem Description:</h1>
	  <p>ptrace(PT_SC_REMOTE) failed to properly validate parameters for
	  the syscall(2) and __syscall(2) meta-system calls.  As a result, a
	  user with the ability to debug a process may trigger arbitrary code
	  execution in the kernel, even if the target process has no special
	  privileges.</p>
	<h1>Impact:</h1>
	  <p>The missing validation allows an unprivileged local user to
	  escalate privileges, potentially gaining full control of the affected
	  system.</p>
      </body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-45253</cvename>
      <freebsdsa>SA-26:21.ptrace</freebsdsa>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-05-20</discovery>
      <entry>2026-05-21</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="3cc34467-54b6-11f1-8d7a-bc241121aa0a">
    <topic>FreeBSD -- Heap overflow in FUSE_LISTXATTR</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
	<name>FreeBSD-kernel</name>
	<range><ge>15.0</ge><lt>15.0_9</lt></range>
	<range><ge>14.4</ge><lt>14.4_5</lt></range>
	<range><ge>14.3</ge><lt>14.3_14</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<h1>Problem Description:</h1>
	  <p>When a fusefs file system implements extended attributes, the
	  kernel may send a FUSE_LISTXATTR message to the userspace daemon
	  to retrieve the list of extended attributes for a given file.  The
	  FUSE protocol requires the daemon to return a packed list of
	  NUL-terminated strings.  The fusefs kernel module calls strlen()
	  on this daemon-supplied buffer without first verifying that the
	  entire list is NUL-terminated.</p>
	<h1>Impact:</h1>
	  <p>If a malicious daemon sends a non-NUL-terminated list, the
	  fusefs kernel module may read beyond the end of one heap-allocated
	  buffer and potentially write beyond the end of a second buffer.  A
	  malicious daemon could disclose up to 253 bytes of kernel heap
	  memory, or it could inject up to 250 attacker-controlled bytes into
	  unallocated kernel heap space.</p>
      </body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-45252</cvename>
      <freebsdsa>SA-26:20.fusefs</freebsdsa>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-05-20</discovery>
      <entry>2026-05-21</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="ee21f41f-54b5-11f1-8d7a-bc241121aa0a">
    <topic>FreeBSD -- Kernel use-after-free via file descriptor syscalls</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
	<name>FreeBSD-kernel</name>
	<range><ge>15.0</ge><lt>15.0_9</lt></range>
	<range><ge>14.4</ge><lt>14.4_5</lt></range>
	<range><ge>14.3</ge><lt>14.3_14</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<h1>Problem Description:</h1>
	  <p>A file descriptor can be closed while a thread is blocked in a
	  poll(2) or select(2) call waiting for that descriptor.  Because the
	  blocked thread does not hold a reference to the underlying object,
	  this closure may result in the object being freed while the thread
	  remains blocked.  In this situation, the kernel must remove the
	  blocked thread from the per-object wait queue prior to freeing the
	  object.</p>
	  <p>In the case of some file descriptor types, the kernel failed to
	  unlink blocked threads from the object before freeing it.  When the
	  blocked thread is subsequently woken, it accesses memory that has
	  already been freed resulting in a use-after-free vulnerability.</p>
	<h1>Impact:</h1>
	  <p>The use-after-free vulnerability may be triggered by an
	  unprivileged local user and can be exploited to obtain superuser
	  privileges.</p>
      </body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-45251</cvename>
      <freebsdsa>SA-26:19.file</freebsdsa>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-05-20</discovery>
      <entry>2026-05-21</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="39728e41-54b5-11f1-8d7a-bc241121aa0a">
    <topic>FreeBSD -- Stack buffer overflow via setcred(2)</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
	<name>FreeBSD-kernel</name>
	<range><ge>15.0</ge><lt>15.0_9</lt></range>
	<range><ge>14.4</ge><lt>14.4_5</lt></range>
	<range><ge>14.3</ge><lt>14.3_14</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<h1>Problem Description:</h1>
	  <p>The setcred(2) system call is only available to privileged
	  users.  However, before the privilege level of the caller is checked,
	  the user-supplied list of supplementary groups is copied into a
	  fixed-size kernel stack buffer without first validating its length.
	  If the supplied list exceeds the capacity of that buffer, a stack
	  buffer overflow occurs.</p>
	<h1>Impact:</h1>
	  <p>Because the bounds check on the supplementary groups list occurs
	  after the kernel stack buffer has already been written, an unprivileged
	  local user may trigger the overflow without holding any special
	  privilege.  Successful exploitation may allow an attacker to execute
	  arbitrary code in the context of the kernel, allowing an unprivileged
	  local user to gain elevated privileges on the affected system.</p>
      </body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-45250</cvename>
      <freebsdsa>SA-26:18.setcred</freebsdsa>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-05-20</discovery>
      <entry>2026-05-21</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="1ed77d8e-53bb-11f1-b339-3497f65b111b">
    <topic>nginx-devel -- multiple vulnerabilities</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
	<name>nginx-devel</name>
	<range><lt>1.31.0</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>The nginx project reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://nginx.org/en/CHANGES">
	  <p>nginx 1.31.0 fixes multiple security issues affecting HTTP/2
	    proxying, rewrite handling, SCGI/uWSGI response handling, charset
	    conversion, HTTP/3 connection migration, and OCSP resolver response
	    processing.</p>
	</blockquote>
      </body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-42926</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-42945</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-42946</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-42934</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-40460</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-40701</cvename>
      <url>https://nginx.org/en/CHANGES</url>
      <url>https://nginx.org/en/security_advisories.html</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-05-13</discovery>
      <entry>2026-05-19</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="f69dbfcc-535b-11f1-8b62-8447094a420f">
    <topic>MySQL -- Multiple vulnerabilities</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
	<name>mysql80-client</name>
	<range><lt>8.0.46</lt></range>
      </package>
      <package>
	<name>mysql84-client</name>
	<range><lt>8.4.9</lt></range>
      </package>
      <package>
	<name>mysql96-client</name>
	<range><lt>9.6.1</lt></range>
      </package>
      <package>
	<name>mysql80-server</name>
	<range><lt>8.0.46</lt></range>
      </package>
      <package>
	<name>mysql84-server</name>
	<range><lt>8.4.9</lt></range>
      </package>
      <package>
	<name>mysql96-server</name>
	<range><lt>9.6.1</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>Oracle reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpuapr2026.html">
	  <p>See linked CVE's for details.</p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2025-15467</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-34270</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-34271</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-34276</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-34308</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-22009</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-22017</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-34272</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-34303</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2025-14017</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-34318</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-34317</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-34319</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-22004</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-34304</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-35236</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-35237</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-35238</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-34293</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-35239</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-35235</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-21998</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-22005</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-22002</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-34267</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-34278</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-35240</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-35234</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-22015</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-22001</cvename>
      <url>https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpuapr2026.html</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-04-21</discovery>
      <entry>2026-05-19</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="31b7e7bc-5358-11f1-8b62-8447094a420f">
    <topic>MariaDB -- Multiple vulnerabilities</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
	<name>mariadb118-client</name>
	<range><lt>11.8.7</lt></range>
      </package>
      <package>
	<name>mariadb114-client</name>
	<range><lt>11.4.11</lt></range>
      </package>
      <package>
	<name>mariadb1011-client</name>
	<range><lt>10.11.17</lt></range>
      </package>
      <package>
	<name>mariadb106-client</name>
	<range><lt>10.6.26</lt></range>
      </package>
      <package>
	<name>mariadb118-server</name>
	<range><lt>11.8.7</lt></range>
      </package>
      <package>
	<name>mariadb114-server</name>
	<range><lt>11.4.11</lt></range>
      </package>
      <package>
	<name>mariadb1011-server</name>
	<range><lt>10.11.17</lt></range>
      </package>
      <package>
	<name>mariadb106-server</name>
	<range><lt>10.6.26</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>The MariaDB project reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://mariadb.com/docs/release-notes/community-server/11.8/11.8.7">
	  <p>See linked CVE's for details.</p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-44173</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-44172</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-44171</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-44170</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-44169</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-44168</cvename>
      <url>https://mariadb.com/docs/release-notes/community-server/11.8/11.8.7</url>
      <url>https://mariadb.com/docs/release-notes/community-server/11.4/11.4.11</url>
      <url>https://mariadb.com/docs/release-notes/community-server/10.11/11.11.17</url>
      <url>https://mariadb.com/docs/release-notes/community-server/10.6/10.6.26</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-05-18</discovery>
      <entry>2026-05-19</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="f0f4bb64-52c6-11f1-a1c0-0050569f0b83">
    <topic>Vinyl/Varnish -- HTTP/2 parsing deficiency</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
      <name>vinyl09</name>
      <range><lt>9.0.1</lt></range>
      </package>
      <package>
      <name>varnish7</name>
      <range><lt>7.7.3_1</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>Vinyl Development Team reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://vinyl-cache.org/security/VSV00019.html">
	  <p>A deficiency in HTTP/2 request parsing can be exploited to launch a backend request
	  desync attack (request smuggling), which in turn can be used for cache poisoning,
	  authentication bypass or possibly even information disclosure and manipulation.</p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <url>https://vinyl-cache.org/security/VSV00019.html</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-05-18</discovery>
      <entry>2026-05-18</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="7185ecc9-4fb7-11f1-bc50-6cc21735f730">
    <topic>PostgreSQL -- Multiple vulnerabilities</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
       <name>postgresql14-server</name>
       <range><lt>14.23</lt></range>
      </package>
      <package>
       <name>postgresql15-server</name>
       <range><lt>15.18</lt></range>
      </package>
      <package>
       <name>postgresql16-server</name>
       <range><lt>16.14</lt></range>
      </package>
      <package>
       <name>postgresql17-server</name>
       <range><lt>17.10</lt></range>
      </package>
      <package>
       <name>postgresql18-server</name>
       <range><lt>18.4</lt></range>
      </package>
       <package>
       <name>postgresql14-client</name>
       <range><lt>14.23</lt></range>
      </package>
      <package>
       <name>postgresql15-client</name>
       <range><lt>15.18</lt></range>
      </package>
      <package>
       <name>postgresql16-client</name>
       <range><lt>16.14</lt></range>
      </package>
      <package>
       <name>postgresql17-client</name>
       <range><lt>17.10</lt></range>
      </package>
      <package>
       <name>postgresql18-client</name>
       <range><lt>18.4</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>The PostgreSQL project reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://www.postgresql.org/about/news/postgresql-184-1710-1614-1518-and-1423-released-3297/">
	<p>
	  Missing authorization in PostgreSQL CREATE TYPE
	  allows an object creator to hijack other queries that use
	  search_path to find user-defined types, including
	  extension-defined types. That is to say, the victim will execute
	  arbitrary SQL functions of the attacker's choice.
	</p>
	<p>
	  Integer wraparound in multiple PostgreSQL server
	  features allows an application input provider to cause the
	  server to undersize an allocation and write out-of-bounds. This
	  results in a segmentation fault.
	</p>
	<p>
	  Externally-controlled format string in PostgreSQL timeofday()
	  function allows an attacker to retrieve portions of server
	  memory, via crafted timezone zones.
	</p>
	<p>
	  Symlink following in
	  PostgreSQL pg_basebackup plain format and in pg_rewind allows an
	  origin superuser to overwrite local files, e.g.
	  /var/lib/postgres/.bashrc, that hijack the operating system
	  account. It will remain the case that starting the server after
	  these commands implicitly trusts the origin superuser, due to
	  features like shared_preload_libraries. Hence, the attack has
	  practical implications only if one takes relevant action between
	  these commands and server start, like moving the files to a
	  different VM or snapshotting the VM.
	</p>
	<p>
	  SQL injection in PostgreSQL
	  pg_createsubscriber allows an attacker with
	  pg_create_subscription rights to execute arbitrary SQL as a
	  superuser. The attack takes effect when pg_createsubscriber next
	  runs. Versions before PostgreSQL 17 are unaffected.
	</p>
	<p>
	  PostgreSQL libpq lo_* functions let server superuser overwrite
	  client stack memory. Use of inherently dangerous function
	  PQfn(..., result_is_int=0, ...) in PostgreSQL libpq lo_export(),
	  lo_read(), lo_lseek64(), and lo_tell64() functions allows the
	  server superuser to overwrite a client stack buffer with an
	  arbitrarily-large response. Like gets(), PQfn(...,
	  result_is_int=0, ...) stores arbitrary-length, server-determined
	  data into a buffer of unspecified size. Because both the
	  \lo_export command in psql and pg_dump call lo_read(), the
	  server superuser can overwrite pg_dump or psql stack memory.
	</p>
	<p>
	  PostgreSQL discloses MD5-hashed passwords via covert timing
	  channel. Covert timing channel in comparison of MD5-hashed
	  password in PostgreSQL authentication allows an attacker to
	  recover user credentials sufficient to authenticate. This does
	  not affect scram-sha-256 passwords, the default in all supported
	  releases. However, current databases may have MD5-hashed
	  passwords originating in upgrades from PostgreSQL 13 or earlier.
	</p>
	<p>
	  PostgreSQL SSL/GSS init causes denial of service, via
	  uncontrolled recursion. Uncontrolled recursion in PostgreSQL SSL
	  and GSS negotiation allows an attacker able to connect to a
	  PostgreSQL AF_UNIX socket to achieve sustained denial of
	  service. If SSL and GSS are both disabled, an attacker can do
	  the same via access to a PostgreSQL TCP socket.
	</p>
	<p>
	  PostgreSQL pg_restore_attribute_stats accepts values that cause
	  query planning to read past end of stats array. Buffer over-read
	  in PostgreSQL function pg_restore_attribute_stats() accepts
	  array values of unmatched length, which causes query planning to
	  read past end of one array. This allows a table maintainer to
	  infer memory values past that array end. Versions before
	  PostgreSQL 18 are unaffected.
	</p>
	<p>
	  PostgreSQL refint allows stack buffer overflow and SQL
	  injection. Stack buffer overflow in PostgreSQL module refint
	  allows an unprivileged database user to execute arbitrary code
	  as the operating system user running the database. A distinct
	  attack is possible if the application declares a user-controlled
	  column as a refint cascade primary key and facilitates
	  user-controlled updates to that column. In that case, a SQL
	  injection allows a primary key update value provider to execute
	  arbitrary SQL as the database user performing the primary key
	  update.
	</p>
	<p>
	  PostgreSQL REFRESH PUBLICATION allows SQL injection via table
	  name. SQL injection in PostgreSQL logical replication ALTER
	  SUBSCRIPTION ... REFRESH PUBLICATION allows a subscriber table
	  creator to execute arbitrary SQL with the subscription's
	  publication-side credentials. The attack takes effect at the
	  next REFRESH PUBLICATION. Versions before PostgreSQL 16 are
	  unaffected.
	</p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-6472</cvename>
      <url>https://www.postgresql.org/support/security/CVE-2026-6472/</url>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-6473</cvename>
      <url>https://www.postgresql.org/support/security/CVE-2026-6473/</url>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-6474</cvename>
      <url>https://www.postgresql.org/support/security/CVE-2026-6474/</url>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-6475</cvename>
      <url>https://www.postgresql.org/support/security/CVE-2026-6475/</url>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-6476</cvename>
      <url>https://www.postgresql.org/support/security/CVE-2026-6476/</url>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-6477</cvename>
      <url>https://www.postgresql.org/support/security/CVE-2026-6477/</url>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-6478</cvename>
      <url>https://www.postgresql.org/support/security/CVE-2026-6478/</url>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-6479</cvename>
      <url>https://www.postgresql.org/support/security/CVE-2026-6479/</url>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-6575</cvename>
      <url>https://www.postgresql.org/support/security/CVE-2026-6575/</url>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-6637</cvename>
      <url>https://www.postgresql.org/support/security/CVE-2026-6637/</url>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-6538</cvename>
      <url>https://www.postgresql.org/support/security/CVE-2026-6538/</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-05-14</discovery>
      <entry>2026-05-14</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="3414ac89-4f9f-11f1-a1c0-0050569f0b83">
    <topic>www/nginx -- Remote Code Execution/DoS</topic>
    <affects>
<package>
<name>nginx</name>
<range><lt>1.30.1,3</lt></range>
</package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>nginx development team reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://nginx.org/en/CHANGES-1.30">
	  <p>When using the "proxy_set_body" directive, an attacker
	  might inject data in the proxied request to an HTTP/2 backend</p>
	  <p>A heap memory buffer overflow might occur in a worker
	  process while handling a specially crafted request by
	  ngx_http_rewrite_module, potentially resulting in arbitrary code
	  execution</p>
	  <p>A heap memory buffer overread might occur in a worker
	  process while handling a specially crafted response by
	  ngx_http_scgi_module or ngx_http_uwsgi_module, allowing an attacker
	  to cause a disclosure of worker process memory or segmentation fault
	  in a worker process</p>
	  <p>A heap memory buffer overread might occur in a worker
	  process while handling a specially sent response with decoding from
	  UTF-8 via the "charset_map" directive, allowing an attacker to cause
	  a limited disclosure of worker proccess memory or segmentation fault
	  in a worker process</p>
	  <p>When using HTTP/3, processing of connection migration might
	  cause new QUIC streams to receive a new client address before
	  validation, allowing an attacker to cause address spoofing</p>
	  <p>use-after-free might occur during DNS server response
	  processing if the "ssl_ocsp" directive was used, allowing an attacker
	  to cause worker process memory corruption or segmentation fault in a
	  worker process</p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-42926</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-42945</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-42946</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-42934</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-40460</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-40701</cvename>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-05-14</discovery>
      <entry>2026-05-14</entry>
      <modified>2026-05-17</modified>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="6e701ad2-4f61-11f1-af6d-10ffe07f9334">
    <topic>mail/mailpit -- multiple vulnerabilities</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
	<name>mailpit</name>
	<range><lt>1.30.0</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
       <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
       <p>Mailpit author reports:</p>
       <blockquote cite="https://github.com/axllent/mailpit/releases/tag/v1.30.0">
	 <p>Set a default 50MB per message limit to prevent DoS via
	 unlimited SMTP DATA and /api/v1/send body sizes
	 (GHSA-fpxj-m5q8-fphw)</p>
	 <p>Include CGNAT (Carrier-Grade NAT) in internal IP checks
	 (GHSA-j3fj-qppj-fmmc)</p>
	 <p>Block internal IP access by default in HTML check
	 (GHSA-j3fj-qppj-fmmc)</p>
	 <p>Fix for path traversal &amp; arbitrary file write in
	 mailpit dump --http &lt;instance&gt; via attacker-controlled
	 message IDs (GHSA-qx5x-85p8-vg4j)</p>
	 <p>Fix concurrent map read &amp; write in proxy CSS rewriter
	 (GHSA-w4vj-r5pg-3722)</p>
       </blockquote>
       </body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-45713</cvename>
      <url>https://github.com/axllent/mailpit/security/advisories/GHSA-fpxj-m5q8-fphw</url>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-45709</cvename>
      <url>https://github.com/axllent/mailpit/security/advisories/GHSA-j3fj-qppj-fmmc</url>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-45711</cvename>
      <url>https://github.com/axllent/mailpit/security/advisories/GHSA-qx5x-85p8-vg4j</url>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-45712</cvename>
      <url>https://github.com/axllent/mailpit/security/advisories/GHSA-w4vj-r5pg-3722</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-05-14</discovery>
      <entry>2026-05-14</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="690144e9-4f88-11f1-982e-00a098b42aeb">
    <topic>py-setuptools -- Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal')</topic>
    <affects>
    <package>
	<name>py27-setuptools44</name>
	<name>py310-setuptools58</name>
	<name>py311-setuptools58</name>
	<name>py312-setuptools58</name>
	<name>py313-setuptools58</name>
	<name>py313t-setuptools58</name>
	<name>py314-setuptools58</name>
	<name>py310-setuptools</name>
	<name>py311-setuptools</name>
	<name>py312-setuptools</name>
	<name>py313-setuptools</name>
	<name>py313t-setuptools</name>
	<name>py314-setuptools</name>
	<range><lt>78.1.1</lt></range>
    </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>https://github.com/pypa/setuptools/security/advisories/GHSA-5rjg-fvgr-3xxf reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://github.com/pypa/setuptools/security/advisories/GHSA-5rjg-fvgr-3xxf">
	  <p>setuptools is a package that allows users to download, build,
	  install, upgrade, and uninstall Python packages. A path traversal
	  vulnerability in `PackageIndex` is present in setuptools prior to
	  version 78.1.1. An attacker would be allowed to write files to
	  arbitrary locations on the filesystem with the permissions of the
	  process running the Python code, which could escalate to remote
	  code execution depending on the context.</p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2025-47273</cvename>
      <url>https://cveawg.mitre.org/api/cve/CVE-2025-47273</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2025-05-17</discovery>
      <entry>2026-05-14</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="b3cb8f40-4f4c-11f1-80f1-2cf05da270f3">
    <topic>Gitlab -- vulnerabilities</topic>
    <affects>
<package>
<name>gitlab-ce</name>
<name>gitlab-ee</name>
<range><ge>18.11.0</ge><lt>18.11.3</lt></range>
<range><ge>18.10.0</ge><lt>18.10.6</lt></range>
<range><ge>8.3.0</ge><lt>18.9.7</lt></range>
</package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>Gitlab reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://docs.gitlab.com/releases/patches/patch-release-gitlab-18-11-3-released/">
	  <p>Cross-site Scripting issue in Analytics dashboard chart rendering impacts GitLab EE</p>
	  <p>Cross-site Scripting issue in global search impacts GitLab CE/EE</p>
	  <p>Cross-site Scripting issue in Duo Agent output rendering impacts GitLab EE</p>
	  <p>Cross-site Scripting issue in Analytics Dashboard impacts GitLab EE</p>
	  <p>Denial of Service issue in CI/CD job update API impacts GitLab CE/EE</p>
	  <p>Denial of Service issue in Duo Workflows API impacts GitLab CE/EE</p>
	  <p>Denial of Service issue in internal API endpoints impacts GitLab CE/EE</p>
	  <p>Improper Authorization issue in GraphQL token scope enforcement impacts GitLab CE/EE</p>
	  <p>Denial of Service issue in Insights Configuration impacts GitLab EE</p>
	  <p>Access Control issue in Issues API impacts GitLab CE/EE</p>
	  <p>Denial of Service issue in direct transfer CSV parser impacts GitLab CE/EE</p>
	  <p>CSRF issue in JiraConnect subscriptions impacts GitLab CE/EE</p>
	  <p>Confused Deputy issue in Jira integration impacts GitLab CE/EE</p>
	  <p>Cross-site Scripting issue in Banzai markdown sanitizer impacts GitLab CE/EE</p>
	  <p>Cross-site Scripting issue in achievement email notifications impacts GitLab CE/EE</p>
	  <p>Access Control issue in Helm package upload impacts GitLab CE/EE</p>
	  <p>Improper Access Control issue in NuGet Symbol Server impacts GitLab CE/EE</p>
	  <p>Improper Access Control issue in Container Registry protected tags impacts GitLab CE/EE</p>
	  <p>Missing Authorization issue in group user search impacts GitLab CE/EE</p>
	  <p>Improper Access Control issue in code owner approval rules impacts GitLab EE</p>
	  <p>Access Control issue in PyPI Package Protection Rules impacts GitLab CE/EE</p>
	  <p>Improper Access Control issue in issue links API impacts GitLab CE/EE</p>
	  <p>Server-Side Request Forgery issue in virtual registry redirect handler impacts GitLab EE</p>
	  <p>Access Control issue in GraphQL approval rule mutations impacts GitLab EE</p>
	  <p>Missing Authorization issue in Security Policy Project Reassignment impacts GitLab EE</p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-7481</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-5297</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-6073</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-7377</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-1659</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2025-14870</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2025-14869</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-1322</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-1184</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-4524</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-8280</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-4527</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-3160</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-6335</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2025-12669</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-3607</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-3074</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-1338</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-8144</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-6063</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-3073</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2025-13874</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-7471</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-2900</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-6883</cvename>
      <url>https://docs.gitlab.com/releases/patches/patch-release-gitlab-18-11-3-released/</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-05-13</discovery>
      <entry>2026-05-14</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="e665f0a2-fe6d-44b0-ba9e-d383f055a8a3">
    <topic>zeek -- potential DoS vulnerability</topic>
    <affects>
	<package>
	    <name>zeek</name>
	    <range><lt>8.0.8</lt></range>
	</package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p> Wojtulewicz of Corelight reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://github.com/zeek/zeek/releases/tag/v8.0.8">
	  <p> A specially-crafted series of MIME headers sent via
	  SMTP or HTTP could cause Zeek to use large amounts of
	  memory and potentially crash. </p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <url>https://github.com/zeek/zeek/releases/tag/v8.0.8</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-05-12</discovery>
      <entry>2026-05-12</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="eeb4d69a-4d74-11f1-9a9c-994b98c88011">
    <topic>dnsmasq -- multiple vulnerabilities</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
	<name>dnsmasq</name>
	<range><lt>2.92rel2,1</lt></range>
      </package>
      <package> <!-- preannounced 2.93rc1, see https://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/pipermail/dnsmasq-discuss/2026q2/018471.html -->
	<name>dnsmasq-devel</name>
	<range><lt>2.93.r1,8</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>Simon Kelley reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/pipermail/dnsmasq-discuss/2026q2/018471.html">
	<p>
	Today, 11th May 2026 CERT is releasing a set of six CVEs for serious
	security vulnerabilities in dnsmasq. These are all long-standing
	bugs
	which apply to pretty much all non-ancient versions.
	</p>
	</blockquote>
	<p>
	Christopher Cullen and Molly Jaconski write, in Vulnerability Note
	VU#471747:
	</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/471747">
	<dl>
	  <dt>CVE-2026-2291</dt>
	  <dd>
	    dnsmasq's <code>extract_name()</code> function can be abused to
	    cause a heap buffer overflow, enabling an attacker to inject false
	    DNS cache entries. This could cause DNS queries to be redirected
	    to attacker-controlled IP addresses or result in a Denial of
	    Service (DoS).
	  </dd>
	  <dt>CVE-2026-4890</dt>
	  <dd>
	    An infinite-loop flaw in the DNSSEC validation of dnsmasq allows
	    remote attackers to cause Denial of Service (DoS) conditions via a
	    crafted DNS packet.
	  </dd>
	  <dt>CVE-2026-4891</dt>
	  <dd>
	    A heap-based out-of-bounds read vulnerability in the DNSSEC
	    validation of dnsmasq allows remote attackers to leak memory
	    information via a crafted DNS packet.
	  </dd>
	  <dt>CVE-2026-4892</dt>
	  <dd>
	    A heap-based out-of-bounds write vulnerability in the DHCPv6
	    implementation of dnsmasq allows local attackers to execute
	    arbitrary code with root privileges via a crafted DHCPv6 packet.
	  </dd>
	  <dt>CVE-2026-4893</dt>
	  <dd>
	    An information disclosure vulnerability in dnsmasq allows remote
	    attackers to bypass source checks via a crafted DNS packet
	    containing RFC 7871 client-subnet information.
	  </dd>
	  <dt>CVE-2026-5172</dt>
	  <dd>
	    A buffer overflow vulnerability in dnsmasq’s <code>extract_addresses()</code> function
	    allows attackers to trigger a heap out-of-bounds read and crash
	    dnsmasq by exploiting a malformed DNS response.
	  </dd>
	</dl>
	</blockquote>
      </body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <url>https://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/pipermail/dnsmasq-discuss/2026q2/018471.html</url>
      <url>https://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/471747</url>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-2291</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-4890</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-4891</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-4892</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-4893</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-5172</cvename>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-03-25</discovery> <!-- earliest commit date for a fix -->
      <entry>2026-05-11</entry> <!-- publication/embargo date -->
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="5b3b7f60-4de9-11f1-873e-0f64d023d0c7">
    <topic>postorius -- XSS</topic>
    <affects>
<package>
<name>py310-postorius</name>
<name>py311-postorius</name>
<name>py312-postorius</name>
<name>py313-postorius</name>
<name>py314-postorius</name>
<name>py315-postorius</name>
<range><lt>1.3.13_2</lt></range>
</package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>NIST reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-44742">
	<p>
	Postorius through 1.3.13 does not escape HTML in the
	message subject when rendering it in the Held messages
	pop-up, as exploited in the wild in May 2026.
	</p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-44742</cvename>
      <url>https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-44742</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2025-01-29</discovery>
      <entry>2026-05-12</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="bacc1417-4d82-11f1-87f3-18dbf25a98c6">
    <topic>Vulnerability found in Expat</topic>
    <affects>
<package>
<name>expat</name>
<name>linux-c7-expat</name>
<name>linux-rl9-expat</name>
<range><lt>2.8.1</lt></range>
</package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<blockquote cite="https://blog.hartwork.org/posts/expat-2-8-1-released/">
	  <p>Expat 2.8.1 was released yesterday. The key motivation for cutting a release and doing so now was:</p>
	  <p>Fixing vulnerability CVE-2026-45186 that allows easy denial of service.</p>
	  <p>See also https://github.com/libexpat/libexpat/pull/1216</p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-45186</cvename>
      <url>https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-45186</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2025-10-01</discovery>
      <entry>2026-05-11</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="ab2258a2-4cea-11f1-aec8-bc241107513d">
    <topic>dash -- arith: INTMAX_MIN / -1 overflow</topic>
    <affects>
<package>
<name>dash</name>
<range><lt>0.5.13.3</lt></range>
</package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/utils/dash/dash.git/commit/?id=0034bfe185d3d875cebace8cb3ca5c9dabf9e0f3 reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/utils/dash/dash.git/commit/?id=0034bfe185d3d875cebace8cb3ca5c9dabf9e0f3">
	    <p>
		Division and remainder currently guard against division by zero, but not
		against the signed overflow case INTMAX_MIN / -1. On affected systems
		this can trigger SIGFPE during arithmetic expansion.
	    </p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-31323</cvename>
      <url>https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/utils/dash/dash.git/commit/?id=0034bfe185d3d875cebace8cb3ca5c9dabf9e0f3</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-04-13</discovery>
      <entry>2026-05-11</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="818efa2a-4aae-11f1-88d3-b42e991fc52e">
    <topic>firefox ESR -- Other issue in the WebRTC component</topic>
    <affects>
    <package>
	<name>firefox-esr</name>
	<range><lt>140.10.2,2</lt></range>
    </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2035939 reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2035939">
	  <p>Other issue in the WebRTC component.</p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-8094</cvename>
      <url>https://cveawg.mitre.org/api/cve/CVE-2026-8094</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-05-07</discovery>
      <entry>2026-05-08</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="7eae7f45-4aae-11f1-88d3-b42e991fc52e">
    <topic>firefox -- Memory safety bugs present in Firefox 150</topic>
    <affects>
    <package>
	<name>firefox</name>
	<range><lt>150.0.2,2</lt></range>
    </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	  <p>https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/security/advisories/mfsa2026-40/ reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/security/advisories/mfsa2026-40/">
	<p>
	  Memory safety bugs present in Firefox 150.0.1. Some of
	  these bugs showed evidence of memory corruption and we
	  presume that with enough effort some of these could have
	  been exploited to run arbitrary code.
	</p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-8093</cvename>
      <url>https://cveawg.mitre.org/api/cve/CVE-2026-8093</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-05-07</discovery>
      <entry>2026-05-08</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="7a9f1c15-4aae-11f1-88d3-b42e991fc52e">
    <topic>firefox -- Memory safety bugs present in Firefox ESR 115</topic>
    <affects>
    <package>
	<name>firefox</name>
	<range><lt>150.0.2,2</lt></range>
    </package>
    <package>
	<name>firefox-esr</name>
	<range><lt>140.10.2,2</lt></range>
    </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	  <p>https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/security/advisories/mfsa2026-40/ reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/security/advisories/mfsa2026-40/">
	<p>
	  Memory safety bugs. Some of these bugs showed evidence of
	  memory corruption and we presume that with enough effort
	  some of these could have been exploited to run arbitrary
	  code.
	</p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-8092</cvename>
      <url>https://cveawg.mitre.org/api/cve/CVE-2026-8092</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-05-07</discovery>
      <entry>2026-05-08</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="76763f24-4aae-11f1-88d3-b42e991fc52e">
    <topic>Mozilla -- Incorrect boundary conditions</topic>
    <affects>
    <package>
	<name>firefox</name>
	<range><lt>150.0.0,2</lt></range>
    </package>
    <package>
	<name>firefox-esr</name>
	<range><lt>140.10.1,2</lt></range>
    </package>
    <package>
	<name>thunderbird</name>
	<range><lt>150.0.0</lt></range>
    </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2029301 reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2029301">
	<p>
	  Incorrect boundary conditions in the Audio/Video: Playback
	  component.
	</p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-8091</cvename>
      <url>https://cveawg.mitre.org/api/cve/CVE-2026-8091</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-05-07</discovery>
      <entry>2026-05-08</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="7360cdae-4aae-11f1-88d3-b42e991fc52e">
    <topic>firefox -- Use-after-free</topic>
    <affects>
    <package>
	<name>firefox</name>
	<range><lt>150.0.2,2</lt></range>
    </package>
    <package>
	<name>firefox-esr</name>
	<range><lt>140.10.2,2</lt></range>
    </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2034352 reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2034352">
	  <p>Use-after-free in the DOM: Networking component.</p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-8090</cvename>
      <url>https://cveawg.mitre.org/api/cve/CVE-2026-8090</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-05-07</discovery>
      <entry>2026-05-08</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="da4d7162-4aa3-11f1-b189-a8a1599412c6">
    <topic>chromium -- security fixes</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
       <name>chromium</name>
       <range><lt>148.0.7778.96</lt></range>
      </package>
      <package>
       <name>ungoogled-chromium</name>
       <range><lt>148.0.7778.96</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
       <p>Chrome Releases reports:</p>
       <blockquote cite="https://chromereleases.googleblog.com/2026/05/stable-channel-update-for-desktop.html">
	 <p>This update includes 127 security fixes:</p>
	 <p>Critical:</p>
	 <ul>
	    <li>[493747582] CVE-2026-7896: Integer overflow in Blink.</li>
	    <li>[504069514] CVE-2026-7897: Use after free in Mobile.</li>
	    <li>[504587882] CVE-2026-7898: Use after free in Chromoting.</li>
	</ul>
	<p>High:</p>
	<ul>
	    <li>[505481948] CVE-2026-7899: Out of bounds read and write in V8.</li>
	    <li>[496503799] CVE-2026-7900: Heap buffer overflow in ANGLE.</li>
	    <li>[497724490] CVE-2026-7901: Use after free in ANGLE.</li>
	    <li>[502030575] CVE-2026-7902: Out of bounds memory access in V8.</li>
	    <li>[491760376] CVE-2026-7903: Integer overflow in ANGLE.</li>
	    <li>[492350406] CVE-2026-7904: Out of bounds read in Fonts.</li>
	    <li>[495259842] CVE-2026-7905: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Media.</li>
	    <li>[496284584] CVE-2026-7906: Use after free in SVG.</li>
	    <li>[496292089] CVE-2026-7907: Use after free in DOM.</li>
	    <li>[497436531] CVE-2026-7908: Use after free in Fullscreen.</li>
	    <li>[497437113] CVE-2026-7909: Inappropriate implementation in ServiceWorker.</li>
	    <li>[497543810] CVE-2026-7910: Use after free in Views.</li>
	    <li>[497548912] CVE-2026-7911: Use after free in Aura.</li>
	    <li>[497639714] CVE-2026-7912: Integer overflow in GPU.</li>
	    <li>[497936728] CVE-2026-7913: Insufficient policy enforcement in DevTools.</li>
	    <li>[498401609] CVE-2026-7914: Type Confusion in Accessibility.</li>
	    <li>[498454478] CVE-2026-7915: Insufficient data validation in DevTools.</li>
	    <li>[498720754] CVE-2026-7916: Insufficient data validation in InterestGroups.</li>
	    <li>[498752242] CVE-2026-7917: Use after free in Fullscreen.</li>
	    <li>[498780188] CVE-2026-7918: Use after free in GPU.</li>
	    <li>[498832921] CVE-2026-7919: Use after free in Aura.</li>
	    <li>[498989348] CVE-2026-7920: Use after free in Skia.</li>
	    <li>[499062376] CVE-2026-7921: Use after free in Passwords.</li>
	    <li>[499449324] CVE-2026-7922: Use after free in ServiceWorker.</li>
	    <li>[500080194] CVE-2026-7923: Out of bounds write in Skia.</li>
	    <li>[500087204] CVE-2026-7924: Uninitialized Use in Dawn.</li>
	    <li>[501833981] CVE-2026-7925: Use after free in Chromoting.</li>
	    <li>[502249087] CVE-2026-7926: Use after free in PresentationAPI.</li>
	    <li>[502830119] CVE-2026-7927: Type Confusion in Runtime.</li>
	    <li>[504612429] CVE-2026-7928: Use after free in WebRTC.</li>
	    <li>[504660052] CVE-2026-7929: Use after free in MediaRecording.</li>
	</ul>
	<p>Medium:</p>
	<ul>
	    <li>[434825208] CVE-2026-7930: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Cookies.</li>
	    <li>[474338157] CVE-2026-7931: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in iOS.</li>
	    <li>[481634116] CVE-2026-7932: Insufficient policy enforcement in Downloads.</li>
	    <li>[488585490] CVE-2026-7933: Out of bounds read in WebCodecs.</li>
	    <li>[489023922] CVE-2026-7934: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Popup Blocker.</li>
	    <li>[489624550] CVE-2026-7935: Inappropriate implementation in Speech.</li>
	    <li>[490485402] CVE-2026-7936: Object lifecycle issue in V8.</li>
	    <li>[491766258] CVE-2026-7937: Insufficient policy enforcement in DevTools.</li>
	    <li>[492735384] CVE-2026-7938: Use after free in CSS.</li>
	    <li>[492963096] CVE-2026-7939: Inappropriate implementation in SanitizerAPI.</li>
	    <li>[493631402] CVE-2026-7940: Use after free in V8.</li>
	    <li>[493955234] CVE-2026-7941: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Mobile.</li>
	    <li>[495363705] CVE-2026-7942: Integer overflow in ANGLE.</li>
	    <li>[495373657] CVE-2026-7943: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in ANGLE.</li>
	    <li>[495783187] CVE-2026-7944: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Persistent Cache.</li>
	    <li>[495802788] CVE-2026-7945: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in COOP.</li>
	    <li>[496016840] CVE-2026-7946: Insufficient policy enforcement in WebUI.</li>
	    <li>[496169594] CVE-2026-7947: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Network.</li>
	    <li>[496193452] CVE-2026-7948: Race in Chromoting.</li>
	    <li>[496206134] CVE-2026-7949: Out of bounds read in Skia.</li>
	    <li>[496259890] CVE-2026-7950: Out of bounds read and write in GFX.</li>
	    <li>[496266456] CVE-2026-7951: Out of bounds write in WebRTC.</li>
	    <li>[496279876] CVE-2026-7952: Insufficient policy enforcement in Extensions.</li>
	    <li>[496379792] CVE-2026-7953: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Omnibox.</li>
	    <li>[496380960] CVE-2026-7954: Race in Shared Storage.</li>
	    <li>[496441232] CVE-2026-7955: Uninitialized Use in GPU.</li>
	    <li>[496463315] CVE-2026-7956: Use after free in Navigation.</li>
	    <li>[496607380] CVE-2026-7957: Out of bounds write in Media.</li>
	    <li>[496632973] CVE-2026-7958: Inappropriate implementation in ServiceWorker.</li>
	    <li>[496645205] CVE-2026-7959: Inappropriate implementation in Navigation.</li>
	    <li>[497007825] CVE-2026-7960: Race in Speech.</li>
	    <li>[497008295] CVE-2026-7961: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Permissions.</li>
	    <li>[497081987] CVE-2026-7962: Insufficient policy enforcement in DirectSockets.</li>
	    <li>[497250399] CVE-2026-7963: Inappropriate implementation in ServiceWorker.</li>
	    <li>[497254383] CVE-2026-7964: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in FileSystem.</li>
	    <li>[497255035] CVE-2026-7965: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in DevTools.</li>
	    <li>[497341787] CVE-2026-7966: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in SiteIsolation.</li>
	    <li>[497365545] CVE-2026-7967: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Navigation.</li>
	    <li>[497432281] CVE-2026-7968: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in CORS.</li>
	    <li>[497450574] CVE-2026-7969: Integer overflow in Network.</li>
	    <li>[497487462] CVE-2026-7970: Use after free in TopChrome.</li>
	    <li>[497529290] CVE-2026-7971: Inappropriate implementation in ORB.</li>
	    <li>[497546281] CVE-2026-7972: Uninitialized Use in GPU.</li>
	    <li>[497565944] CVE-2026-7973: Integer overflow in Dawn.</li>
	    <li>[497649372] CVE-2026-7974: Use after free in Blink.</li>
	    <li>[497735587] CVE-2026-7975: Use after free in DevTools.</li>
	    <li>[497736679] CVE-2026-7976: Use after free in Views.</li>
	    <li>[497821223] CVE-2026-7977: Inappropriate implementation in Canvas.</li>
	    <li>[497828892] CVE-2026-7978: Inappropriate implementation in Companion.</li>
	    <li>[497849876] CVE-2026-7979: Inappropriate implementation in Media.</li>
	    <li>[497859275] CVE-2026-7980: Use after free in WebAudio.</li>
	    <li>[497926602] CVE-2026-7981: Out of bounds read in Codecs.</li>
	    <li>[497952533] CVE-2026-7982: Uninitialized Use in WebCodecs.</li>
	    <li>[497975608] CVE-2026-7983: Out of bounds read in Dawn.</li>
	    <li>[498277368] CVE-2026-7984: Use after free in ReadingMode.</li>
	    <li>[498352423] CVE-2026-7985: Use after free in GPU.</li>
	    <li>[498396238] CVE-2026-7986: Insufficient policy enforcement in Autofill.</li>
	    <li>[498696266] CVE-2026-7987: Use after free in WebRTC.</li>
	    <li>[498753456] CVE-2026-7988: Type Confusion in WebRTC.</li>
	    <li>[498765082] CVE-2026-7989: Insufficient data validation in DataTransfer.</li>
	    <li>[498892267] CVE-2026-7990: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Updater.</li>
	    <li>[499065126] CVE-2026-7991: Use after free in UI.</li>
	    <li>[499067529] CVE-2026-7992: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in UI.</li>
	    <li>[499099003] CVE-2026-7993: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Payments.</li>
	    <li>[499116954] CVE-2026-7994: Inappropriate implementation in Chromoting.</li>
	    <li>[501745798] CVE-2026-7995: Out of bounds read in AdFilter.</li>
	</ul>
	<p>Low:</p>
	<ul>
	    <li>[484547631] CVE-2026-7996: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in SSL.</li>
	    <li>[487960705] CVE-2026-7997: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Updater.</li>
	    <li>[491676472] CVE-2026-7998: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Dialog.</li>
	    <li>[493099941] CVE-2026-7999: Inappropriate implementation in V8.</li>
	    <li>[494464734] CVE-2026-8000: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in ChromeDriver.</li>
	    <li>[494764371] CVE-2026-8001: Use after free in Printing.</li>
	    <li>[495779613] CVE-2026-8002: Use after free in Audio.</li>
	    <li>[495985532] CVE-2026-8003: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in TabGroups.</li>
	    <li>[496189510] CVE-2026-8004: Insufficient policy enforcement in DevTools.</li>
	    <li>[496298665] CVE-2026-8005: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Cast.</li>
	    <li>[496373088] CVE-2026-8006: Insufficient policy enforcement in DevTools.</li>
	    <li>[496399759] CVE-2026-8007: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Cast.</li>
	    <li>[496426191] CVE-2026-8008: Inappropriate implementation in DevTools.</li>
	    <li>[496555077] CVE-2026-8009: Inappropriate implementation in Cast.</li>
	    <li>[496624084] CVE-2026-8010: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in SiteIsolation.</li>
	    <li>[496626029] CVE-2026-8011: Insufficient policy enforcement in Search.</li>
	    <li>[496628298] CVE-2026-8012: Inappropriate implementation in MHTML.</li>
	    <li>[497427430] CVE-2026-8013: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in FedCM.</li>
	    <li>[497490364] CVE-2026-8014: Inappropriate implementation in Preload.</li>
	    <li>[497548558] CVE-2026-8015: Inappropriate implementation in Media.</li>
	    <li>[497695401] CVE-2026-8016: Use after free in WebRTC.</li>
	    <li>[497722578] CVE-2026-8017: Side-channel information leakage in Media.</li>
	    <li>[498292657] CVE-2026-8018: Insufficient policy enforcement in DevTools.</li>
	    <li>[498353173] CVE-2026-8019: Insufficient policy enforcement in WebApp.</li>
	    <li>[498382925] CVE-2026-8020: Uninitialized Use in GPU.</li>
	    <li>[498417031] CVE-2026-8021: Script injection in UI.</li>
	    <li>[499194407] CVE-2026-8022: Inappropriate implementation in MHTML.</li>
	 </ul>
       </blockquote>
      </body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-7896</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-7897</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-7898</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-7899</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-7900</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-7901</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-7902</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-7903</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-7904</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-7905</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-7906</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-7907</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-7908</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-7909</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-7910</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-7911</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-7912</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-7913</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-7914</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-7915</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-7916</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-7917</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-7918</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-7919</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-7920</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-7921</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-7922</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-7923</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-7924</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-7925</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-7926</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-7927</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-7928</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-7929</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-7930</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-7931</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-7932</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-7933</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-7934</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-7935</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-7936</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-7937</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-7938</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-7939</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-7940</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-7941</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-7942</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-7943</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-7944</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-7945</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-7946</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-7947</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-7948</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-7949</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-7950</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-7951</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-7952</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-7953</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-7954</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-7955</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-7956</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-7957</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-7958</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-7959</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-7960</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-7961</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-7962</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-7963</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-7964</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-7965</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-7966</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-7967</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-7968</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-7969</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-7970</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-7971</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-7972</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-7973</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-7974</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-7975</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-7976</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-7977</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-7978</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-7979</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-7980</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-7981</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-7982</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-7983</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-7984</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-7985</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-7986</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-7987</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-7988</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-7989</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-7990</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-7991</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-7992</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-7993</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-7994</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-7995</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-7996</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-7997</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-7998</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-7999</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-8000</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-8001</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-8002</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-8003</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-8004</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-8005</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-8006</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-8007</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-8008</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-8009</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-8010</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-8011</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-8012</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-8013</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-8014</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-8015</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-8016</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-8017</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-8018</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-8019</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-8020</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-8021</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-8022</cvename>
      <url>https://chromereleases.googleblog.com/2026/05/stable-channel-update-for-desktop.html</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-05-05</discovery>
      <entry>2026-05-08</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="67e31a04-49fa-11f1-9b23-b42e991fc52e">
    <topic>MongoDB Server -- Multiple vulnerabilities</topic>
    <affects>
    <package>
	<name>mongodb80</name>
	<range><lt>8.0.21</lt></range>
    </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>https://jira.mongodb.org/browse/SERVER-119981 reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://jira.mongodb.org/browse/SERVER-119981">
	<ul>
	    <li>
	    Computing the MD5 checksum of a malformed BSON object
	    under specific conditions may cause loss of availability
	    in MongoDB server.
	    </li>
	    <li>
	    An authorization flaw in the user management command
	    could allow an authenticated user to make limited
	    changes to authentication-related data associated with
	    another user account. This could affect how
	    authentication is performed for the impacted account.
	    </li>
	</ul>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-6914</cvename>
      <url>https://cveawg.mitre.org/api/cve/CVE-2026-6914</url>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-6915</cvename>
      <url>https://cveawg.mitre.org/api/cve/CVE-2026-6915</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-04-29</discovery>
      <entry>2026-05-07</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="9b5d6fbb-4893-11f1-82bf-3c7c3fba4204">
    <topic>devel/ocaml-opam -- CWE-24 Path Traversal: '../filedir'</topic>
    <affects>
    <package>
	<name>ocaml-opam</name>
	<range><lt>2.5.1</lt></range>
    </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p><a href="https://github.com/ocaml/opam/releases/tag/2.5.1">https://github.com/ocaml/opam/releases/tag/2.5.1</a> reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://github.com/ocaml/opam/releases/tag/2.5.1">
	  <p>In OCaml opam before 2.5.1, a .install field containing a destination
filepath can use ../ to reach a parent directory.</p>
	<p>Reported by <a href="https://github.com/andrew">Andrew Nesbitt</a> &lt;andrewnez@gmail.com&gt;.</p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-41082</cvename>
      <url>https://cveawg.mitre.org/api/cve/CVE-2026-41082</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-04-16</discovery>
      <entry>2026-05-05</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="1ccc383b-486a-11f1-8b62-8447094a420f">
    <topic>www/apache24 -- Multiple vulnerabilities</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
	<name>apache24</name>
	<range><lt>2.4.67</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>The Apache httpd project reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://dlcdn.apache.org/httpd/CHANGES_2.4.67">
	  <p>mod_proxy_ajp: CVE-2026-34059, CVE-2026-34032, CVE-2026-33857, CVE-2026-28780</p>
	  <p>multiple modules: CVE-2026-33523</p>
	  <p>mod_authn_socache: CVE-2026-33007</p>
	  <p>mod_auth_digest: CVE-2026-33006</p>
	  <p>mod_dav_lock: mod_dav_lock</p>
	  <p>mod_md: CVE-2026-29168</p>
	  <p>mod_rewrite: CVE-2026-24072</p>
	  <p>mod_http2: CVE-2026-23918</p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-34059</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-34032</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-33857</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-33523</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-33007</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-33006</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-29169</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-29168</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-28780</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-24072</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-23918</cvename>
      <url>https://dlcdn.apache.org/httpd/CHANGES_2.4.67</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-05-04</discovery>
      <entry>2026-05-05</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="3c02dcfd-47d7-11f1-99fb-3497f65b111b">
    <topic>modsecurity3 -- multiple vulnerabilities</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
       <name>modsecurity3</name>
       <range><lt>3.0.15</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
       <p>
       ModSecurity is an open source web application firewall engine.
       </p>
       <p>
       According to the upstream changelog, multiple vulnerabilities have been fixed.
       </p>
       <ul>
       <li>CVE-2026-42268: unsigned integer underflow in verify operators</li>
       <li>CVE-2026-30923: buffer overflow in hex_decode</li>
       </ul>
      </body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-42268</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-30923</cvename>
      <url>https://github.com/owasp-modsecurity/ModSecurity/blob/v3.0.15/CHANGES</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-04-28</discovery>
      <entry>2026-05-04</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="e4a08820-470d-11f1-be75-b42e991fc52e">
    <topic>Mozilla -- Memory safety bugs</topic>
    <affects>
    <package>
	<name>firefox</name>
	<range><lt>150.0.1,2</lt></range>
    </package>
    <package>
	<name>firefox-esr</name>
	<range><lt>140.10.1,2</lt></range>
    </package>
    <package>
	<name>thunderbird</name>
	<range><lt>150.0.1</lt></range>
    </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/buglist.cgi?bug_id=2028537%2C2029911%2C2031121%2C2033602 reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/buglist.cgi?bug_id=2028537%2C2029911%2C2031121%2C2033602">
	<p>
	Memory safety bugs. Some of these bugs showed evidence of
	memory corruption and we presume that with enough effort
	some of these could have been exploited to run arbitrary
	code.
	</p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-7323</cvename>
      <url>https://cveawg.mitre.org/api/cve/CVE-2026-7323</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-04-28</discovery>
      <entry>2026-05-03</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="a420f545-442c-11f1-b9b5-589cfc0dc9a2">
    <topic>Prosody XMPP server advisory 2026-04-29</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
      <name>prosody</name>
      <range><lt>13.0.5</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>The Prosody team reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://prosody.im/security/advisory_735dd9d3/">
	<p>Traffic patterns were discovered which can cause Prosody to consume excessive
	amounts of memory with much smaller amounts of incoming traffic. This traffic
	can be sent by unauthenticated connections. It was discovered that
	mod_proxy65’s access control was broken and incomplete due to two bugs.</p>
	<p>The issue with unpausing connections was discovered and disclosed by <a href="https://github.com/MaxHearnden">Max Hearnden</a>.</p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-43504</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-43505</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-43506</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-43507</cvename>
      <url>https://prosody.im/security/advisory_735dd9d3/</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-04-29</discovery>
      <entry>2026-04-30</entry>
      <modified>2026-05-08</modified>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="7ebfb0bf-44b4-11f1-8b82-3c7c3fba4204">
    <topic>Text::CSV_XS -- CWE-825 Expired Pointer Dereference</topic>
    <affects>
    <package>
	<name>p5-Text-CSV_XS</name>
	<range><lt>1.62</lt></range>
    </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>H.Merijn Brand - Tux &lt;linux@tux.freedom.nl&gt; reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://github.com/cpan-authors/Text-CSV_XS/commit/c17f31a5f2bf36674748eb4b6e25672f0571a224.patch">
	  <p>Text::CSV_XS versions before 1.62 for Perl have a use-after-free
when registered callbacks extend the Perl argument stack, which may
enable type confusion or memory corruption.

The Parse, print, getline, and getline_all methods invoke registered
callbacks (for example after_parse, before_print, or on_error) and
cache the Perl argument stack pointer across the call.  If a callback
extends the argument stack enough to trigger a reallocation, the
return value is written through the stale pointer into the freed
buffer, and the caller reads the original $self argument as the
return value instead.

Calling code that expects parsed data from getline_all receives the
Text::CSV_XS object in its place, leading to logic errors or crashes.
Text::CSV_XS objects used without any registered callbacks are not
affected.</p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-7111</cvename>
      <url>https://cveawg.mitre.org/api/cve/CVE-2026-7111</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-04-29</discovery>
      <entry>2026-04-30</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="c3a9c5a6-4435-11f1-bb07-bc241121aa0a">
    <topic>FreeBSD -- Heap overflow in libnv</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
	<name>FreeBSD-kernel</name>
	<range><ge>15.0</ge><lt>15.0_7</lt></range>
	<range><ge>14.4</ge><lt>14.4_3</lt></range>
	<range><ge>14.3</ge><lt>14.3_12</lt></range>
	<range><ge>13.5</ge><lt>13.5_13</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<h1>Problem Description:</h1>
	  <p>When processing the header of an incoming message, libnv failed
	  to properly validate the message size.</p>
	<h1>Impact:</h1>
	  <p>The lack of validation allows a malicious program to write
	  outside the bounds of a heap allocation.  This can trigger a crash
	  or system panic, and it may be possible for an unprivileged user
	  to exploit the bug to elevate their privileges.</p>
      </body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-35547</cvename>
      <freebsdsa>SA-26:17.libnv</freebsdsa>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-04-29</discovery>
      <entry>2026-04-30</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="892fabf5-4435-11f1-bb07-bc241121aa0a">
    <topic>FreeBSD -- Stack overflow via select() file descriptor set overflow</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
	<name>FreeBSD</name>
	<range><ge>15.0</ge><lt>15.0_7</lt></range>
	<range><ge>14.4</ge><lt>14.4_3</lt></range>
	<range><ge>14.3</ge><lt>14.3_12</lt></range>
	<range><ge>13.5</ge><lt>13.5_13</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<h1>Problem Description:</h1>
	  <p>When exchanging data over a socket, libnv uses select(2) to
	  wait for data to arrive.  However, it does not verify whether the
	  provided socket descriptor fits in select(2)'s file descriptor set
	  size limit of FD_SETSIZE (1024).</p>
	<h1>Impact:</h1>
	  <p>An attacker who is able to force a libnv application to allocate
	  large file descriptors, e.g., by opening many descriptors and
	  executing a program which is not careful to close them upon startup,
	  can trigger stack corruption.  If the target application is
	  setuid-root, then this could be used to elevate local privileges.</p>
      </body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-39457</cvename>
      <freebsdsa>SA-26:16.libnv</freebsdsa>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-04-29</discovery>
      <entry>2026-04-30</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="58acf4c5-4435-11f1-bb07-bc241121aa0a">
    <topic>FreeBSD -- Remotely triggerable out-of-bounds heap write in dhclient</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
	<name>FreeBSD</name>
	<range><ge>15.0</ge><lt>15.0_7</lt></range>
	<range><ge>14.4</ge><lt>14.4_3</lt></range>
	<range><ge>14.3</ge><lt>14.3_12</lt></range>
	<range><ge>13.5</ge><lt>13.5_13</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<h1>Problem Description:</h1>
	  <p>As dhclient is building an environment to pass to dhclient-script,
	  it may need to resize the array of string pointers.  The code which
	  expands the array incorrectly calculates its new size when requesting
	  memory, resulting in a heap buffer overrun.</p>
	<h1>Impact:</h1>
	  <p>A specially crafted packet can cause dhclient to overrun its
	  buffer of environment entries.  This can result in a crash, but it
	  may be possible to leverage this bug to achieve remote code
	  execution.</p>
      </body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-42512</cvename>
      <freebsdsa>SA-26:15.dhclient</freebsdsa>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-04-29</discovery>
      <entry>2026-04-30</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="225ba563-4435-11f1-bb07-bc241121aa0a">
    <topic>FreeBSD -- pf can overflow the stack parsing crafted SCTP packets</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
	<name>FreeBSD-kernel</name>
	<range><ge>15.0</ge><lt>15.0_7</lt></range>
	<range><ge>14.4</ge><lt>14.4_3</lt></range>
	<range><ge>14.3</ge><lt>14.3_12</lt></range>
	<range><ge>13.5</ge><lt>13.5_13</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<h1>Problem Description:</h1>
	  <p>Incorrect packet validation allowed unbounded recursion parsing
	  SCTP chunk parameters.  This can eventually result in a stack
	  overflow and panic.</p>
	<h1>Impact:</h1>
	  <p>Remote attackers can craft packets which cause affected systems
	  to panic.  This affects any system where pf is configured to process
	  traffic, independent of the configured ruleset.</p>
      </body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-7164</cvename>
      <freebsdsa>SA-26:14.pf</freebsdsa>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-04-29</discovery>
      <entry>2026-04-30</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="f528ea29-4434-11f1-bb07-bc241121aa0a">
    <topic>FreeBSD -- Local privilege escalation via execve()</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
	<name>FreeBSD-kernel</name>
	<range><ge>15.0</ge><lt>15.0_7</lt></range>
	<range><ge>14.4</ge><lt>14.4_3</lt></range>
	<range><ge>14.3</ge><lt>14.3_12</lt></range>
	<range><ge>13.5</ge><lt>13.5_13</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<h1>Problem Description:</h1>
	  <p>An operator precedence bug in the kernel results in a scenario
	  where a buffer overflow causes attacker-controlled data to overwrite
	  adjacent execve(2) argument buffers.</p>
	<h1>Impact:</h1>
	  <p>The bug may be exploitable by an unprivileged user to obtain
	  superuser privileges.</p>
      </body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-7270</cvename>
      <freebsdsa>SA-26:13.exec</freebsdsa>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-04-29</discovery>
      <entry>2026-04-30</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="9eb2533e-4434-11f1-bb07-bc241121aa0a">
    <topic>FreeBSD -- Remote code execution via malicious DHCP options</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
	<name>FreeBSD</name>
	<range><ge>15.0</ge><lt>15.0_7</lt></range>
	<range><ge>14.4</ge><lt>14.4_3</lt></range>
	<range><ge>14.3</ge><lt>14.3_12</lt></range>
	<range><ge>13.5</ge><lt>13.5_13</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<h1>Problem Description:</h1>
	  <p>The BOOTP file field is written to the lease file without
	  escaping embedded double-quotes, allowing injection of arbitrary
	  dhclient.conf directives.  When the lease file is subsequently
	  re-parsed by dhclient, e.g., after a system restart, an attacker-controlled
	  field from the lease is passed to dhclient-script(8), which evaluates
	  it.</p>
	<h1>Impact:</h1>
	  <p>A rogue DHCP server may be able to execute arbirary code as
	  root on a system running dhclient.</p>
      </body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-42511</cvename>
      <freebsdsa>SA-26:12.dhclient</freebsdsa>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-04-29</discovery>
      <entry>2026-04-30</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="787cde46-4424-11f1-943f-05b19d100dca">
    <topic>openexr -- multiple vulnerabilities</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
	<name>openexr</name>
	<range><lt>3.4.11</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>Cary Phillips reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://github.com/AcademySoftwareFoundation/openexr/releases/tag/v3.4.11">
	  <p>[OpenEXR v3.4.11 is a p]atch release that addresses the following security vulnerabilities:</p>
	  <ul>
	    <li>CVE-2026-42217 Shift exponent overflow in readVariableLengthInteger() (ImfIDManifest.cpp)</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-42216 Out-of-bounds read in IDManifest::init() during prefix expansion</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-41142 Integer overflow in ImageChannel::resize leads to heap OOB write via OpenEXRUtil public API</li>
	    <li>OSS-fuzz 504280155 Heap-buffer-overflow in DwaCompressor_uncompress</li>
	    <li>OSS-fuzz 505062709 Null-dereference READ in Imf_3_3::prefixFromLayerName</li>
	  </ul>
	</blockquote>
      </body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-42217</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-42216</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-41142</cvename>
      <url>https://github.com/AcademySoftwareFoundation/openexr/releases/tag/v3.4.11</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-04-29</discovery>
      <entry>2026-04-29</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="98c23e2b-43c7-11f1-a190-b42e991fc52e">
    <topic>Mozilla -- Sandbox escape</topic>
    <affects>
    <package>
	<name>firefox</name>
	<range><lt>150.0.0,2</lt></range>
    </package>
    <package>
	<name>firefox-esr</name>
	<range><lt>140.10.1,2</lt></range>
    </package>
    <package>
	<name>thunderbird</name>
	<range><lt>150.0.0</lt></range>
    </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2029461 reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2029461">
	<p>
	Sandbox escape due to incorrect boundary conditions in the
	WebRTC: Networking component.
	</p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-7321</cvename>
      <url>https://cveawg.mitre.org/api/cve/CVE-2026-7321</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-04-28</discovery>
      <entry>2026-04-29</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="5a44e168-4394-11f1-a190-b42e991fc52e">
    <topic>firefox -- Memory safety bugs</topic>
    <affects>
    <package>
	<name>firefox</name>
	<range><lt>150.0.1,2</lt></range>
    </package>
    <package>
	<name>firefox-esr</name>
	<range><lt>140.10.0,2</lt></range>
    </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/buglist.cgi?bug_id=2021904%2C2022731%2C2027158%2C2027733%2C2027973%2C2027976%2C2028231%2C2028731%2C2028886%2C2029067%2C2029700%2C2029724%2C2029806%2C2029814%2C2030108%2C2030111%2C2031524%2C2031921%2C2032040 reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/buglist.cgi?bug_id=2021904%2C2022731%2C2027158%2C2027733%2C2027973%2C2027976%2C2028231%2C2028731%2C2028886%2C2029067%2C2029700%2C2029724%2C2029806%2C2029814%2C2030108%2C2030111%2C2031524%2C2031921%2C2032040">
	<p>
	Memory safety bugs. Some of these bugs showed evidence of
	memory corruption and we presume that with enough effort
	some of these could have been exploited to run arbitrary
	code.
	</p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-7322</cvename>
      <url>https://cveawg.mitre.org/api/cve/CVE-2026-7322</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-04-28</discovery>
      <entry>2026-04-29</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="581838b8-4394-11f1-a190-b42e991fc52e">
    <topic>firefox -- Information disclosure</topic>
    <affects>
    <package>
	<name>firefox</name>
	<range><lt>150.0.1,2</lt></range>
    </package>
    <package>
	<name>firefox-esr</name>
	<range><lt>140.10.1,2</lt></range>
    </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2027433 reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2027433">
	<p>
	Information disclosure due to incorrect boundary
	conditions in the Audio/Video component.
	</p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-7320</cvename>
      <url>https://cveawg.mitre.org/api/cve/CVE-2026-7320</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-04-28</discovery>
      <entry>2026-04-29</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="560f4838-4394-11f1-a190-b42e991fc52e">
    <topic>firefox -- Memory safety bugs</topic>
    <affects>
    <package>
	<name>firefox</name>
	<range><lt>150.0.1,2</lt></range>
    </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/buglist.cgi?bug_id=2029419%2C2029717%2C2029769%2C2029886 reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/buglist.cgi?bug_id=2029419%2C2029717%2C2029769%2C2029886">
	<p>
	Memory safety bugs. Some of these bugs showed evidence of
	memory corruption and we presume that with enough effort
	some of these could have been exploited to run arbitrary
	code.
	</p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-7324</cvename>
      <url>https://cveawg.mitre.org/api/cve/CVE-2026-7324</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-04-28</discovery>
      <entry>2026-04-29</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="53ff336e-4394-11f1-a190-b42e991fc52e">
    <topic>firefox -- Information disclosure</topic>
    <affects>
    <package>
	<name>firefox</name>
	<range><lt>150.0.1,2</lt></range>
    </package>
    <package>
	<name>firefox-esr</name>
	<range><lt>140.10.1,2</lt></range>
    </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2027433 reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2027433">
	<p>
	Information disclosure due to incorrect boundary
	conditions in the Audio/Video component.
	</p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-7320</cvename>
      <url>https://cveawg.mitre.org/api/cve/CVE-2026-7320</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-04-28</discovery>
      <entry>2026-04-29</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="6f1af47d-430a-11f1-a627-b42e991fc52e">
    <topic>Mozilla -- Memory safety bugs</topic>
    <affects>
    <package>
	<name>firefox</name>
	<range><lt>150.0.0,2</lt></range>
    </package>
    <package>
	<name>firefox-esr</name>
	<range><lt>140.10.0,2</lt></range>
    </package>
    <package>
	<name>thunderbird</name>
	<range><lt>150.0.0</lt></range>
    </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/buglist.cgi?bug_id=2010727%2C2019004%2C2019224%2C2019547%2C2020378%2C2022381%2C2022608%2C2022785%2C2023120%2C2023128%2C2023140%2C2023279%2C2023836%2C2023882%2C2023925%2C2023950%2C2023959%2C2023965%2C2024243%2C2024245%2C2024247%2C2024253%2C2024346%2C2024357%2C2024416%2C2024420%2C2024429%2C2024432%2C2024455%2C2024466%2C2024468%2C2024476%2C2024664%2C2024666%2C2024669%2C2024670%2C2024671%2C2024761%2C2024918%2C2025292%2C2025332%2C2025348%2C2025384%2C2025395%2C2025458%2C2025461%2C2025463%2C2025481%2C2025483%2C2025485%2C2025494%2C2025506%2C2025511%2C2025513%2C2025520%2C2026277%2C2026282%2C2026288%2C2026289%2C2026311%2C2026312%2C2026869%2C2027152%2C2027161%2C2027238%2C2027261%2C2027269%2C2027274%2C2027280%2C2027281%2C2027300%2C2027302%2C2027331%2C2027339%2C2027340%2C2027738%2C2027975%2C2028000%2C2028011%2C2028289%2C2028525%2C2028728%2C2028887%2C2028888%2C2028896%2C2029063%2C2029064%2C2029290%2C2029291%2C2029294%2C2029300%2C2029304%2C2029316%2C2029317%2C2029401%2C2029415%2C2029430%2C2029457%2C2029727%2C2029735%2C2029743%2C2029752%2C2029754%2C2029776%2C2029809%2C2030324%2C2030370 reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/buglist.cgi?bug_id=2010727%2C2019004%2C2019224%2C2019547%2C2020378%2C2022381%2C2022608%2C2022785%2C2023120%2C2023128%2C2023140%2C2023279%2C2023836%2C2023882%2C2023925%2C2023950%2C2023959%2C2023965%2C2024243%2C2024245%2C2024247%2C2024253%2C2024346%2C2024357%2C2024416%2C2024420%2C2024429%2C2024432%2C2024455%2C2024466%2C2024468%2C2024476%2C2024664%2C2024666%2C2024669%2C2024670%2C2024671%2C2024761%2C2024918%2C2025292%2C2025332%2C2025348%2C2025384%2C2025395%2C2025458%2C2025461%2C2025463%2C2025481%2C2025483%2C2025485%2C2025494%2C2025506%2C2025511%2C2025513%2C2025520%2C2026277%2C2026282%2C2026288%2C2026289%2C2026311%2C2026312%2C2026869%2C2027152%2C2027161%2C2027238%2C2027261%2C2027269%2C2027274%2C2027280%2C2027281%2C2027300%2C2027302%2C2027331%2C2027339%2C2027340%2C2027738%2C2027975%2C2028000%2C2028011%2C2028289%2C2028525%2C2028728%2C2028887%2C2028888%2C2028896%2C2029063%2C2029064%2C2029290%2C2029291%2C2029294%2C2029300%2C2029304%2C2029316%2C2029317%2C2029401%2C2029415%2C2029430%2C2029457%2C2029727%2C2029735%2C2029743%2C2029752%2C2029754%2C2029776%2C2029809%2C2030324%2C2030370">
	<p>
	Memory safety bugs present. Some of these bugs showed
	evidence of memory corruption and we presume that with
	enough effort some of these could have been exploited to
	run arbitrary code.
	</p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-6786</cvename>
      <url>https://cveawg.mitre.org/api/cve/CVE-2026-6786</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-04-21</discovery>
      <entry>2026-04-28</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="6c9ca7e3-430a-11f1-a627-b42e991fc52e">
    <topic>Mozilla -- Memory safety bugs</topic>
    <affects>
    <package>
	<name>firefox</name>
	<range><lt>150.0.0,2</lt></range>
    </package>
    <package>
	<name>firefox-esr</name>
	<range><lt>140.10.0,2</lt></range>
    </package>
    <package>
	<name>thunderbird</name>
	<range><lt>150.0.0</lt></range>
    </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/buglist.cgi?bug_id=1935995%2C1999158%2C2015952%2C2021909%2C2022026%2C2022041%2C2022088%2C2022276%2C2022335%2C2022338%2C2022373%2C2022597%2C2022874%2C2023276%2C2023544%2C2023551%2C2023599%2C2023608%2C2023814%2C2024233%2C2024239%2C2024241%2C2024242%2C2024250%2C2024251%2C2024343%2C2024422%2C2024425%2C2024440%2C2024442%2C2024446%2C2024458%2C2024463%2C2024478%2C2024650%2C2024653%2C2024654%2C2024655%2C2024656%2C2024661%2C2024662%2C2024668%2C2024919%2C2025278%2C2025349%2C2025350%2C2025354%2C2025360%2C2025363%2C2025370%2C2025379%2C2025381%2C2025399%2C2025400%2C2025403%2C2025407%2C2025415%2C2025420%2C2025427%2C2025429%2C2025430%2C2025479%2C2025489%2C2025493%2C2025497%2C2025502%2C2025515%2C2025517%2C2025526%2C2025609%2C2025948%2C2025949%2C2025951%2C2025953%2C2025955%2C2025962%2C2025969%2C2025970%2C2025971%2C2025973%2C2025976%2C2025977%2C2026280%2C2026285%2C2026293%2C2026296%2C2026310%2C2027237%2C2027260%2C2027268%2C2027277%2C2027284%2C2027291%2C2027293%2C2027298%2C2027330%2C2027342%2C2027345%2C2027359%2C2027365%2C2027378%2C2027754%2C2027959%2C2027962%2C2027964%2C2027971%2C2027974%2C2027979%2C2027982%2C2027995%2C2028001%2C2028267%2C2028268%2C2028275%2C2028288%2C2028290%2C2028291%2C2028528%2C2028551%2C2028627%2C2028879%2C2028889%2C2029061%2C2029071%2C2029283%2C2029296%2C2029314%2C2029323%2C2029411%2C2029423%2C2029424%2C2029425%2C2029427%2C2029436%2C2029440%2C2029449%2C2029450%2C2029458%2C2029462%2C2029468%2C2029472%2C2029690%2C2029707%2C2029708%2C2029728%2C2029802%2C2029896%2C2029906%2C2030106%2C2030118%2C2030123%2C2030135%2C2030230%2C2030320 reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/buglist.cgi?bug_id=1935995%2C1999158%2C2015952%2C2021909%2C2022026%2C2022041%2C2022088%2C2022276%2C2022335%2C2022338%2C2022373%2C2022597%2C2022874%2C2023276%2C2023544%2C2023551%2C2023599%2C2023608%2C2023814%2C2024233%2C2024239%2C2024241%2C2024242%2C2024250%2C2024251%2C2024343%2C2024422%2C2024425%2C2024440%2C2024442%2C2024446%2C2024458%2C2024463%2C2024478%2C2024650%2C2024653%2C2024654%2C2024655%2C2024656%2C2024661%2C2024662%2C2024668%2C2024919%2C2025278%2C2025349%2C2025350%2C2025354%2C2025360%2C2025363%2C2025370%2C2025379%2C2025381%2C2025399%2C2025400%2C2025403%2C2025407%2C2025415%2C2025420%2C2025427%2C2025429%2C2025430%2C2025479%2C2025489%2C2025493%2C2025497%2C2025502%2C2025515%2C2025517%2C2025526%2C2025609%2C2025948%2C2025949%2C2025951%2C2025953%2C2025955%2C2025962%2C2025969%2C2025970%2C2025971%2C2025973%2C2025976%2C2025977%2C2026280%2C2026285%2C2026293%2C2026296%2C2026310%2C2027237%2C2027260%2C2027268%2C2027277%2C2027284%2C2027291%2C2027293%2C2027298%2C2027330%2C2027342%2C2027345%2C2027359%2C2027365%2C2027378%2C2027754%2C2027959%2C2027962%2C2027964%2C2027971%2C2027974%2C2027979%2C2027982%2C2027995%2C2028001%2C2028267%2C2028268%2C2028275%2C2028288%2C2028290%2C2028291%2C2028528%2C2028551%2C2028627%2C2028879%2C2028889%2C2029061%2C2029071%2C2029283%2C2029296%2C2029314%2C2029323%2C2029411%2C2029423%2C2029424%2C2029425%2C2029427%2C2029436%2C2029440%2C2029449%2C2029450%2C2029458%2C2029462%2C2029468%2C2029472%2C2029690%2C2029707%2C2029708%2C2029728%2C2029802%2C2029896%2C2029906%2C2030106%2C2030118%2C2030123%2C2030135%2C2030230%2C2030320">
	<p>
	Memory safety bugs. Some of these bugs showed evidence of
	memory corruption and we presume that with enough effort
	some of these could have been exploited to run arbitrary
	code.
	</p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-6785</cvename>
      <url>https://cveawg.mitre.org/api/cve/CVE-2026-6785</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-04-21</discovery>
      <entry>2026-04-28</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="6881ae01-430a-11f1-a627-b42e991fc52e">
    <topic>Mozilla -- Memory safety bugs</topic>
    <affects>
    <package>
	<name>firefox</name>
	<range><lt>150.0.0,2</lt></range>
    </package>
    <package>
	<name>thunderbird</name>
	<range><lt>150.0.0</lt></range>
    </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/buglist.cgi?bug_id=1536243%2C1745382%2C1851073%2C1893400%2C1963301%2C2001319%2C2002899%2C2012436%2C2014435%2C2016901%2C2019916%2C2020486%2C2020612%2C2020817%2C2021788%2C2022051%2C2022367%2C2022431%2C2023302%2C2023670%2C2024225%2C2024238%2C2024240%2C2024265%2C2024367%2C2024369%2C2024424%2C2024760%2C2025281%2C2025361%2C2025387%2C2025466%2C2025954%2C2025958%2C2026278%2C2026292%2C2026297%2C2026378%2C2027148%2C2027287%2C2027341%2C2027384%2C2027427%2C2027694%2C2027993%2C2028009%2C2028270%2C2028416%2C2028524%2C2029295%2C2029301%2C2029461%2C2029699%2C2029800%2C2029801 reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/buglist.cgi?bug_id=1536243%2C1745382%2C1851073%2C1893400%2C1963301%2C2001319%2C2002899%2C2012436%2C2014435%2C2016901%2C2019916%2C2020486%2C2020612%2C2020817%2C2021788%2C2022051%2C2022367%2C2022431%2C2023302%2C2023670%2C2024225%2C2024238%2C2024240%2C2024265%2C2024367%2C2024369%2C2024424%2C2024760%2C2025281%2C2025361%2C2025387%2C2025466%2C2025954%2C2025958%2C2026278%2C2026292%2C2026297%2C2026378%2C2027148%2C2027287%2C2027341%2C2027384%2C2027427%2C2027694%2C2027993%2C2028009%2C2028270%2C2028416%2C2028524%2C2029295%2C2029301%2C2029461%2C2029699%2C2029800%2C2029801">
	<p>
	Memory safety bugs. Some of these bugs showed evidence of
	memory corruption and we presume that with enough effort
	some of these could have been exploited to run arbitrary
	code.
	</p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-6784</cvename>
      <url>https://cveawg.mitre.org/api/cve/CVE-2026-6784</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-04-21</discovery>
      <entry>2026-04-28</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="65858bef-430a-11f1-a627-b42e991fc52e">
    <topic>Mozilla -- Incorrect boundary conditions, integer overflow in the Audio/Video: Playback component</topic>
    <affects>
    <package>
	<name>firefox</name>
	<range><lt>150.0.0,2</lt></range>
    </package>
    <package>
	<name>thunderbird</name>
	<range><lt>150.0.0</lt></range>
    </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2027564 reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2027564">
	<p>
	Incorrect boundary conditions, integer overflow in the
	Audio/Video: Playback component.
	</p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-6783</cvename>
      <url>https://cveawg.mitre.org/api/cve/CVE-2026-6783</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-04-21</discovery>
      <entry>2026-04-28</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="62053c0f-430a-11f1-a627-b42e991fc52e">
    <topic>Mozilla -- Information disclosure in the IP Protection component</topic>
    <affects>
    <package>
	<name>firefox</name>
	<range><lt>150.0.0,2</lt></range>
    </package>
    <package>
	<name>thunderbird</name>
	<range><lt>150.0.0</lt></range>
    </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2026571 reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2026571">
	  <p>Information disclosure in the IP Protection component.</p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-6782</cvename>
      <url>https://cveawg.mitre.org/api/cve/CVE-2026-6782</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-04-21</discovery>
      <entry>2026-04-28</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="5f2386b6-430a-11f1-a627-b42e991fc52e">
    <topic>Mozilla -- Denial-of-service</topic>
    <affects>
    <package>
	<name>firefox</name>
	<range><lt>150.0.0,2</lt></range>
    </package>
    <package>
	<name>thunderbird</name>
	<range><lt>150.0.0</lt></range>
    </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2025583 reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2025583">
	  <p>Denial-of-service in the Audio/Video: Playback component.</p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-6781</cvename>
      <url>https://cveawg.mitre.org/api/cve/CVE-2026-6781</url>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-6780</cvename>
      <url>https://cveawg.mitre.org/api/cve/CVE-2026-6780</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-04-21</discovery>
      <entry>2026-04-28</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="58a378c8-430a-11f1-a627-b42e991fc52e">
    <topic>Mozilla -- Other issue in the JavaScript Engine component</topic>
    <affects>
    <package>
	<name>firefox</name>
	<range><lt>150.0.0,2</lt></range>
    </package>
    <package>
	<name>thunderbird</name>
	<range><lt>150.0.0</lt></range>
    </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2023343 reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2023343">
	  <p>Other issue in the JavaScript Engine component.</p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-6779</cvename>
      <url>https://cveawg.mitre.org/api/cve/CVE-2026-6779</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-04-21</discovery>
      <entry>2026-04-28</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="5124ce36-430a-11f1-a627-b42e991fc52e">
    <topic>Mozilla -- Invalid pointer</topic>
    <affects>
    <package>
	<name>firefox</name>
	<range><lt>150.0.0,2</lt></range>
    </package>
    <package>
	<name>thunderbird</name>
	<range><lt>150.0.0</lt></range>
    </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2022746 reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2022746">
	  <p>Invalid pointer in the Audio/Video: Playback component.</p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-6778</cvename>
      <url>https://cveawg.mitre.org/api/cve/CVE-2026-6778</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-04-21</discovery>
      <entry>2026-04-28</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="4ca48006-430a-11f1-a627-b42e991fc52e">
    <topic>Mozilla -- Other issue in the Networking: DNS component</topic>
    <affects>
    <package>
	<name>firefox</name>
	<range><lt>150.0.0,2</lt></range>
    </package>
    <package>
	<name>thunderbird</name>
	<range><lt>150.0.0</lt></range>
    </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2022726 reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2022726">
	  <p>Other issue in the Networking: DNS component.</p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-6777</cvename>
      <url>https://cveawg.mitre.org/api/cve/CVE-2026-6777</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-04-21</discovery>
      <entry>2026-04-28</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="48003ad3-430a-11f1-a627-b42e991fc52e">
    <topic>Mozilla -- Incorrect boundary conditions</topic>
    <affects>
    <package>
	<name>firefox</name>
	<range><lt>150.0.0,2</lt></range>
    </package>
    <package>
	<name>firefox-esr</name>
	<range><lt>140.10.0,2</lt></range>
    </package>
    <package>
	<name>thunderbird</name>
	<range><lt>150.0.0</lt></range>
    </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2021770 reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2021770">
	<p>
	Incorrect boundary conditions in the WebRTC: Networking
	component.
	</p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-6776</cvename>
      <url>https://cveawg.mitre.org/api/cve/CVE-2026-6776</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-04-21</discovery>
      <entry>2026-04-28</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="27c3930a-4307-11f1-a627-b42e991fc52e">
    <topic>Mozilla -- Incorrect boundary conditions in the WebRTC component</topic>
    <affects>
    <package>
	<name>firefox</name>
	<range><lt>150.0.0,2</lt></range>
    </package>
    <package>
	<name>thunderbird</name>
	<range><lt>150.0.0</lt></range>
    </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2021768 reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2021768">
	  <p>Incorrect boundary conditions in the WebRTC component.</p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-6775</cvename>
      <url>https://cveawg.mitre.org/api/cve/CVE-2026-6775</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-04-21</discovery>
      <entry>2026-04-28</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="2510f10a-4307-11f1-a627-b42e991fc52e">
    <topic>Mozilla -- Mitigation bypass</topic>
    <affects>
    <package>
	<name>firefox</name>
	<range><lt>150.0.0,2</lt></range>
    </package>
    <package>
	<name>thunderbird</name>
	<range><lt>150.0.0</lt></range>
    </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2016915 reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2016915">
	  <p>Mitigation bypass in the DOM: Security component.</p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-6774</cvename>
      <url>https://cveawg.mitre.org/api/cve/CVE-2026-6774</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-04-21</discovery>
      <entry>2026-04-28</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="2239d66b-4307-11f1-a627-b42e991fc52e">
    <topic>Mozilla -- Denial-of-service</topic>
    <affects>
    <package>
	<name>firefox</name>
	<range><lt>150.0.0,2</lt></range>
    </package>
    <package>
	<name>thunderbird</name>
	<range><lt>150.0.0</lt></range>
    </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2015959 reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2015959">
	<p>
	Denial-of-service due to integer overflow in the Graphics:
	WebGPU component.
	</p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-6773</cvename>
      <url>https://cveawg.mitre.org/api/cve/CVE-2026-6773</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-04-21</discovery>
      <entry>2026-04-28</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="1fc576a4-4307-11f1-a627-b42e991fc52e">
    <topic>Mozilla -- Incorrect boundary conditions</topic>
    <affects>
    <package>
	<name>firefox</name>
	<range><lt>150.0.0,2</lt></range>
    </package>
    <package>
	<name>firefox-esr</name>
	<range><lt>140.10.0,2</lt></range>
    </package>
    <package>
	<name>thunderbird</name>
	<range><lt>150.0.0</lt></range>
    </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2026089 reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2026089">
	<p>
	Incorrect boundary conditions in the Libraries component
	in NSS.
	</p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-6772</cvename>
      <url>https://cveawg.mitre.org/api/cve/CVE-2026-6772</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-04-21</discovery>
      <entry>2026-04-28</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="1d3f0d87-4307-11f1-a627-b42e991fc52e">
    <topic>Mozilla -- Mitigation bypass</topic>
    <affects>
    <package>
	<name>firefox</name>
	<range><lt>150.0.0,2</lt></range>
    </package>
    <package>
	<name>firefox-esr</name>
	<range><lt>140.10.0,2</lt></range>
    </package>
    <package>
	<name>thunderbird</name>
	<range><lt>150.0.0</lt></range>
    </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2025067 reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2025067">
	  <p>Mitigation bypass in the DOM: Security component.</p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-6771</cvename>
      <url>https://cveawg.mitre.org/api/cve/CVE-2026-6771</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-04-21</discovery>
      <entry>2026-04-28</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="1a442c0b-4307-11f1-a627-b42e991fc52e">
    <topic>Mozilla -- Other issue in the Storage: IndexedDB component</topic>
    <affects>
    <package>
	<name>firefox</name>
	<range><lt>150.0.0,2</lt></range>
    </package>
    <package>
	<name>firefox-esr</name>
	<range><lt>140.10.0,2</lt></range>
    </package>
    <package>
	<name>thunderbird</name>
	<range><lt>150.0.0</lt></range>
    </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2024220 reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2024220">
	  <p>Other issue in the Storage: IndexedDB component.</p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-6770</cvename>
      <url>https://cveawg.mitre.org/api/cve/CVE-2026-6770</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-04-21</discovery>
      <entry>2026-04-28</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="177a7146-4307-11f1-a627-b42e991fc52e">
    <topic>Mozilla -- Privilege escalation in the Debugger component</topic>
    <affects>
    <package>
	<name>firefox</name>
	<range><lt>150.0.0,2</lt></range>
    </package>
    <package>
	<name>firefox-esr</name>
	<range><lt>140.10.0,2</lt></range>
    </package>
    <package>
	<name>thunderbird</name>
	<range><lt>150.0.0</lt></range>
    </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2023753 reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2023753">
	  <p>Privilege escalation in the Debugger component.</p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-6769</cvename>
      <url>https://cveawg.mitre.org/api/cve/CVE-2026-6769</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-04-21</discovery>
      <entry>2026-04-28</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="872a6e95-4305-11f1-a627-b42e991fc52e">
    <topic>Mozilla -- Mitigation bypass</topic>
    <affects>
    <package>
	<name>firefox</name>
	<range><lt>150.0.0,2</lt></range>
    </package>
    <package>
	<name>firefox-esr</name>
	<range><lt>140.10.0,2</lt></range>
    </package>
    <package>
	<name>thunderbird</name>
	<range><lt>150.0.0</lt></range>
    </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2023615 reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2023615">
	  <p>Mitigation bypass in the Networking: Cookies component.</p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-6768</cvename>
      <url>https://cveawg.mitre.org/api/cve/CVE-2026-6768</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-04-21</discovery>
      <entry>2026-04-28</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="82451a4b-4305-11f1-a627-b42e991fc52e">
    <topic>Mozilla -- Other issue in the Libraries component in NSS</topic>
    <affects>
    <package>
	<name>firefox</name>
	<range><lt>150.0.0,2</lt></range>
    </package>
    <package>
	<name>firefox-esr</name>
	<range><lt>140.10.0,2</lt></range>
    </package>
    <package>
	<name>thunderbird</name>
	<range><lt>150.0.0</lt></range>
    </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2023209 reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2023209">
	  <p>Other issue in the Libraries component in NSS.</p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-6767</cvename>
      <url>https://cveawg.mitre.org/api/cve/CVE-2026-6767</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-04-21</discovery>
      <entry>2026-04-28</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="7ff13e75-4305-11f1-a627-b42e991fc52e">
    <topic>Mozilla -- Incorrect boundary conditions</topic>
    <affects>
    <package>
	<name>firefox</name>
	<range><lt>150.0.0,2</lt></range>
    </package>
    <package>
	<name>firefox-esr</name>
	<range><lt>140.10.0,2</lt></range>
    </package>
    <package>
	<name>thunderbird</name>
	<range><lt>150.0.0</lt></range>
    </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2023207 reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2023207">
	<p>
	Incorrect boundary conditions in the Libraries component
	in NSS.
	</p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-6766</cvename>
      <url>https://cveawg.mitre.org/api/cve/CVE-2026-6766</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-04-21</discovery>
      <entry>2026-04-28</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="7da0d8ae-4305-11f1-a627-b42e991fc52e">
    <topic>Mozilla -- Information disclosure</topic>
    <affects>
    <package>
	<name>firefox</name>
	<range><lt>150.0.0,2</lt></range>
    </package>
    <package>
	<name>firefox-esr</name>
	<range><lt>140.10.0,2</lt></range>
    </package>
    <package>
	<name>thunderbird</name>
	<range><lt>150.0.0</lt></range>
    </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2022419 reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2022419">
	  <p>Information disclosure in the Form Autofill component.</p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-6765</cvename>
      <url>https://cveawg.mitre.org/api/cve/CVE-2026-6765</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-04-21</discovery>
      <entry>2026-04-28</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="7ae808b5-4305-11f1-a627-b42e991fc52e">
    <topic>Mozilla -- Incorrect boundary conditions</topic>
    <affects>
    <package>
	<name>firefox</name>
	<range><lt>150.0.0,2</lt></range>
    </package>
    <package>
	<name>firefox-esr</name>
	<range><lt>140.10.0,2</lt></range>
    </package>
    <package>
	<name>thunderbird</name>
	<range><lt>150.0.0</lt></range>
    </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2022162 reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2022162">
	<p>
	Incorrect boundary conditions in the DOM: Device Interfaces
	component.
	</p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-6764</cvename>
      <url>https://cveawg.mitre.org/api/cve/CVE-2026-6764</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-04-21</discovery>
      <entry>2026-04-28</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="785dfce9-4305-11f1-a627-b42e991fc52e">
    <topic>Mozilla -- Mitigation bypass</topic>
    <affects>
    <package>
	<name>firefox</name>
	<range><lt>150.0.0,2</lt></range>
    </package>
    <package>
	<name>firefox-esr</name>
	<range><lt>140.10.0,2</lt></range>
    </package>
    <package>
	<name>thunderbird</name>
	<range><lt>150.0.0</lt></range>
    </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2021666 reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2021666">
	  <p>Mitigation bypass in the File Handling component.</p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-6763</cvename>
      <url>https://cveawg.mitre.org/api/cve/CVE-2026-6763</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-04-21</discovery>
      <entry>2026-04-28</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="75b1251d-4305-11f1-a627-b42e991fc52e">
    <topic>Mozilla -- Spoofing issue</topic>
    <affects>
    <package>
	<name>firefox</name>
	<range><lt>150.0.0,2</lt></range>
    </package>
    <package>
	<name>firefox-esr</name>
	<range><lt>140.10.0,2</lt></range>
    </package>
    <package>
	<name>thunderbird</name>
	<range><lt>150.0.0</lt></range>
    </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2021080 reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2021080">
	  <p>Spoofing issue in the DOM: Core &amp; HTML component.</p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-6762</cvename>
      <url>https://cveawg.mitre.org/api/cve/CVE-2026-6762</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-04-21</discovery>
      <entry>2026-04-28</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="73091a42-4305-11f1-a627-b42e991fc52e">
    <topic>Mozilla -- Privilege escalation</topic>
    <affects>
    <package>
	<name>firefox</name>
	<range><lt>150.0.0,2</lt></range>
    </package>
    <package>
	<name>firefox-esr</name>
	<range><lt>140.10.0,2</lt></range>
    </package>
    <package>
	<name>thunderbird</name>
	<range><lt>150.0.0</lt></range>
    </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2017857 reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2017857">
	  <p>Privilege escalation in the Networking component.</p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-6761</cvename>
      <url>https://cveawg.mitre.org/api/cve/CVE-2026-6761</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-04-21</discovery>
      <entry>2026-04-28</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="6f7989ef-4305-11f1-a627-b42e991fc52e">
    <topic>Mozilla -- Mitigation bypass</topic>
    <affects>
    <package>
	<name>firefox</name>
	<range><lt>150.0.0,2</lt></range>
    </package>
    <package>
	<name>thunderbird</name>
	<range><lt>150.0.0</lt></range>
    </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2016923 reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2016923">
	  <p>Mitigation bypass in the Networking: Cookies component.</p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-6760</cvename>
      <url>https://cveawg.mitre.org/api/cve/CVE-2026-6760</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-04-21</discovery>
      <entry>2026-04-28</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="6cc5536b-4305-11f1-a627-b42e991fc52e">
    <topic>Mozilla -- Use-after-free</topic>
    <affects>
    <package>
	<name>firefox</name>
	<range><lt>150.0.0,2</lt></range>
    </package>
    <package>
	<name>firefox-esr</name>
	<range><lt>140.10.0,2</lt></range>
    </package>
    <package>
	<name>thunderbird</name>
	<range><lt>150.0.0</lt></range>
    </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2016164 reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2016164">
	  <p>Use-after-free in the Widget: Cocoa component.</p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-6759</cvename>
      <url>https://cveawg.mitre.org/api/cve/CVE-2026-6759</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-04-21</discovery>
      <entry>2026-04-28</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="6a439169-4305-11f1-a627-b42e991fc52e">
    <topic>Mozilla -- Use-after-free</topic>
    <affects>
    <package>
	<name>firefox</name>
	<range><lt>150.0.0,2</lt></range>
    </package>
    <package>
	<name>thunderbird</name>
	<range><lt>150.0.0</lt></range>
    </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2013619 reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2013619">
	  <p>Use-after-free in the JavaScript: WebAssembly component.</p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-6758</cvename>
      <url>https://cveawg.mitre.org/api/cve/CVE-2026-6758</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-04-21</discovery>
      <entry>2026-04-28</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="671af4b2-4305-11f1-a627-b42e991fc52e">
    <topic>Mozilla -- Invalid pointer</topic>
    <affects>
    <package>
	<name>firefox</name>
	<range><lt>150.0.0,2</lt></range>
    </package>
    <package>
	<name>firefox-esr</name>
	<range><lt>140.10.0,2</lt></range>
    </package>
    <package>
	<name>thunderbird</name>
	<range><lt>150.0.0</lt></range>
    </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2013588 reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2013588">
	  <p>Invalid pointer in the JavaScript: WebAssembly component.</p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-6757</cvename>
      <url>https://cveawg.mitre.org/api/cve/CVE-2026-6757</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-04-21</discovery>
      <entry>2026-04-28</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="61805c9e-4305-11f1-a627-b42e991fc52e">
    <topic>Mozilla -- Mitigation bypass</topic>
    <affects>
    <package>
	<name>firefox</name>
	<range><lt>150.0.0,2</lt></range>
    </package>
    <package>
	<name>thunderbird</name>
	<range><lt>150.0.0</lt></range>
    </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1880429 reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1880429">
	  <p>Mitigation bypass in the DOM: postMessage component.</p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-6755</cvename>
      <url>https://cveawg.mitre.org/api/cve/CVE-2026-6755</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-04-21</discovery>
      <entry>2026-04-28</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="5ef5236d-4305-11f1-a627-b42e991fc52e">
    <topic>Mozilla -- Use-after-free</topic>
    <affects>
    <package>
	<name>firefox</name>
	<range><lt>150.0.0,2</lt></range>
    </package>
    <package>
	<name>firefox-esr</name>
	<range><lt>140.10.0,2</lt></range>
    </package>
    <package>
	<name>thunderbird</name>
	<range><lt>150.0.0</lt></range>
    </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2027541 reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2027541">
	  <p>Use-after-free in the JavaScript Engine component.</p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-6754</cvename>
      <url>https://cveawg.mitre.org/api/cve/CVE-2026-6754</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-04-21</discovery>
      <entry>2026-04-28</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="5b679594-4305-11f1-a627-b42e991fc52e">
    <topic>Mozilla -- Incorrect boundary</topic>
    <affects>
    <package>
	<name>firefox</name>
	<range><lt>150.0.0,2</lt></range>
    </package>
    <package>
	<name>firefox-esr</name>
	<range><lt>140.10.0,2</lt></range>
    </package>
    <package>
	<name>thunderbird</name>
	<range><lt>150.0.0</lt></range>
    </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2027501 reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2027501">
	  <p>Incorrect boundary conditions in the WebRTC component.</p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-6753</cvename>
      <url>https://cveawg.mitre.org/api/cve/CVE-2026-6753</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-04-21</discovery>
      <entry>2026-04-28</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="58b5fb4b-4305-11f1-a627-b42e991fc52e">
    <topic>Mozilla -- Incorrect boundary conditions</topic>
    <affects>
    <package>
	<name>firefox</name>
	<range><lt>150.0.0,2</lt></range>
    </package>
    <package>
	<name>firefox-esr</name>
	<range><lt>140.10.0,2</lt></range>
    </package>
    <package>
	<name>thunderbird</name>
	<range><lt>150.0.0</lt></range>
    </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2027499 reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2027499">
	  <p>Incorrect boundary conditions in the WebRTC component.</p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-6752</cvename>
      <url>https://cveawg.mitre.org/api/cve/CVE-2026-6752</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-04-21</discovery>
      <entry>2026-04-28</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="56443cff-4305-11f1-a627-b42e991fc52e">
    <topic>Mozilla -- Uninitialized memory</topic>
    <affects>
    <package>
	<name>firefox</name>
	<range><lt>150.0.0,2</lt></range>
    </package>
    <package>
	<name>firefox-esr</name>
	<range><lt>140.10.0,2</lt></range>
    </package>
    <package>
	<name>thunderbird</name>
	<range><lt>150.0.0</lt></range>
    </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2025883 reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2025883">
	<p>
	Uninitialized memory in the Audio/Video: Web Codecs component.
	</p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-6751</cvename>
      <url>https://cveawg.mitre.org/api/cve/CVE-2026-6751</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-04-21</discovery>
      <entry>2026-04-28</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="537b8679-4305-11f1-a627-b42e991fc52e">
    <topic>Mozilla -- Privilege escalation</topic>
    <affects>
    <package>
	<name>firefox</name>
	<range><lt>150.0.0,2</lt></range>
    </package>
    <package>
	<name>firefox-esr</name>
	<range><lt>140.10.0,2</lt></range>
    </package>
    <package>
	<name>thunderbird</name>
	<range><lt>150.0.0</lt></range>
    </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2023407 reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2023407">
	  <p>Privilege escalation in the Graphics: WebRender component.</p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-6750</cvename>
      <url>https://cveawg.mitre.org/api/cve/CVE-2026-6750</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-04-21</discovery>
      <entry>2026-04-28</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="50ba4596-4305-11f1-a627-b42e991fc52e">
    <topic>Mozilla -- Information disclosure</topic>
    <affects>
    <package>
	<name>firefox</name>
	<range><lt>150.0.0,2</lt></range>
    </package>
    <package>
	<name>firefox-esr</name>
	<range><lt>140.10.0,2</lt></range>
    </package>
    <package>
	<name>thunderbird</name>
	<range><lt>150.0.0</lt></range>
    </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2022610 reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2022610">
	<p>
	Information disclosure due to uninitialized memory in the
	Graphics: Canvas2D component.
	</p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-6749</cvename>
      <url>https://cveawg.mitre.org/api/cve/CVE-2026-6749</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-04-21</discovery>
      <entry>2026-04-28</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="4dcdba00-4305-11f1-a627-b42e991fc52e">
    <topic>Mozilla -- Uninitialized memory</topic>
    <affects>
    <package>
	<name>firefox</name>
	<range><lt>150.0.0,2</lt></range>
    </package>
    <package>
	<name>firefox-esr</name>
	<range><lt>140.10.0,2</lt></range>
    </package>
    <package>
	<name>thunderbird</name>
	<range><lt>150.0.0</lt></range>
    </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2022604 reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2022604">
	<p>
	Uninitialized memory in the Audio/Video: Web Codecs
	component.
	</p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-6748</cvename>
      <url>https://cveawg.mitre.org/api/cve/CVE-2026-6748</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-04-21</discovery>
      <entry>2026-04-28</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="4ac6c6b3-4305-11f1-a627-b42e991fc52e">
    <topic>Mozilla -- Use-after-free</topic>
    <affects>
    <package>
	<name>firefox</name>
	<range><lt>150.0.0,2</lt></range>
    </package>
    <package>
	<name>firefox-esr</name>
	<range><lt>140.10.0,2</lt></range>
    </package>
    <package>
	<name>thunderbird</name>
	<range><lt>150.0.0</lt></range>
    </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2021769 reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2021769">
	  <p>Use-after-free in the WebRTC component.</p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-6747</cvename>
      <url>https://cveawg.mitre.org/api/cve/CVE-2026-6747</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-04-21</discovery>
      <entry>2026-04-28</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="444cbf60-4305-11f1-a627-b42e991fc52e">
    <topic>firefox -- Use-after-free</topic>
    <affects>
    <package>
	<name>firefox</name>
	<range><lt>150.0.0,2</lt></range>
    </package>
    <package>
	<name>firefox-esr</name>
	<range><lt>140.10.0,2</lt></range>
    </package>
    <package>
	<name>thunderbird</name>
	<range><lt>150.0.0</lt></range>
    </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2014596 reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2014596">
	  <p>Use-after-free in the DOM: Core &amp; HTML component.</p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-6746</cvename>
      <url>https://cveawg.mitre.org/api/cve/CVE-2026-6746</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-04-21</discovery>
      <entry>2026-04-28</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="dea605e6-41c9-11f1-8455-901b0e13f1a0">
    <topic>libXpm -- Out-of-bounds read in xpmNextWord()</topic>
    <affects>
    <package>
	<name>libXpm</name>
	<range><lt>3.5.19</lt></range>
    </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>The X.Org project reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-announce/2026-April/003690.html">
	  <p>
	    libXpm uses a number of internal helper functions to parse the XPM
	    file format.
	    One of these internal functions, xpmNextString(), checks for the
	    NULL terminator when looking for the end of the current string but
	    not when looking for the beginning of the next string.
	    A small XPM file with a malformed color table definition may cause
	    the function xpmNextWord(), called from xpmParseColors() following
	    a call to xpmNextString(), to start past the actual end of the file,
	    causing an out-of-bound read.
	  </p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-4367</cvename>
      <url>https://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-announce/2026-April/003690.html</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-04-21</discovery>
      <entry>2026-04-27</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="88440f1d-4168-11f1-95f7-00a098b42aeb">
    <topic>(lib)expat -- Insufficient entropy</topic>
    <affects>
    <package>
	<name>expat</name>
	<range><lt>2.8.0</lt></range>
    </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>https://github.com/libexpat/libexpat/pull/1183 reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://github.com/libexpat/libexpat/pull/1183">
	  <p>libexpat before 2.8.0 uses insufficient entropy, and thus hash
	  flooding can occur via a crafted XML document.</p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-41080</cvename>
      <url>https://cveawg.mitre.org/api/cve/CVE-2026-41080</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-04-16</discovery>
      <entry>2026-04-26</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="ca62e49c-4150-11f1-95f7-00a098b42aeb">
    <topic>lcms2 -- Integer overflow</topic>
    <affects>
    <package>
	<name>lcms2</name>
	<range><lt>2.19</lt></range>
    </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>https://github.com/mm2/Little-CMS/commit/da6110b1d14abc394633a388209abd5ebedd7ab0 reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://github.com/mm2/Little-CMS/commit/da6110b1d14abc394633a388209abd5ebedd7ab0">
	  <p>Little CMS (lcms2) through 2.18 has an integer overflow in
	  CubeSize in cmslut.c because the overflow check is performed after
	  the multiplication.</p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-41254</cvename>
      <url>https://cveawg.mitre.org/api/cve/CVE-2026-41254</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-04-18</discovery>
      <entry>2026-04-26</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="73b927a6-3ecd-11f1-be20-2cf05da270f3">
    <topic>Gitlab -- vulnerabilities</topic>
    <affects>
<package>
<name>gitlab-ce</name>
<name>gitlab-ee</name>
<range><ge>18.11.0</ge><lt>18.11.1</lt></range>
<range><ge>18.10.0</ge><lt>18.10.4</lt></range>
<range><ge>9.2.0</ge><lt>18.9.6</lt></range>
</package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>Gitlab reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://docs.gitlab.com/releases/patches/patch-release-gitlab-18-11-1-released/">
	  <p>Cross-Site Request Forgery issue in GraphQL API impacts GitLab CE/EE GitLab</p>
	  <p>Improper Resolution of Path Equivalence issue in Web IDE asset impacts GitLab CE/EE</p>
	  <p>Cross-site Scripting issue in Storybook impacts GitLab CE/EE</p>
	  <p>Denial of Service issue in discussions endpoint impacts GitLab CE/EE</p>
	  <p>Denial of Service issue in Jira import impacts GitLab CE/EE</p>
	  <p>Denial of Service issue in notes endpoint impacts GitLab CE/EE</p>
	  <p>Denial of Service issue in GraphQL API impacts GitLab CE/EE</p>
	  <p>Insufficient Session Expiration issue in virtual registry credentials validation impacts GitLab CE/E</p>
	  <p>Improper Access Control issue in issue description renderer impacts GitLab CE/EE</p>
	  <p>Improper Restriction of Rendered UI Layers or Frames issue in Mermaid sandbox impacts GitLab CE/EE</p>
	  <p>Improper Access Control issue in project fork relationship API impacts GitLab CE/EE</p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-4922</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-5816</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-5262</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2025-0186</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-1660</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2025-6016</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2025-3922</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-6515</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-5377</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-3254</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2025-9957</cvename>
      <url>https://docs.gitlab.com/releases/patches/patch-release-gitlab-18-11-1-released/</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-04-22</discovery>
      <entry>2026-04-23</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="549313db-3e93-11f1-8d38-7fbbe0285610">
    <topic>OpenVPN -- server DOS and data leak in TLS handshake vulnerabilities</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
	<name>openvpn</name>
	<range><ge>2.7.0</ge><lt>2.7.2</lt></range>
	<range><lt>2.6.20</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>Gert Doering reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://github.com/OpenVPN/openvpn/blob/v2.7.2/Changes.rst">
	  <p>[Security fixes in 2.7.2]</p>
	  <ul>
	    <li>fix race condition in TLS handshake that could lead to leaking of packet data from a previous handshake under specific circumstances (CVE-2026-40215)</li>
	    <li>fix server [termination] on receiving a suitably malformed packet with a valid tls-crypt-v2 key (CVE-2026-35058)</li>
	  </ul>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-35058</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-40215</cvename>
      <url>https://github.com/OpenVPN/openvpn/blob/v2.7.2/Changes.rst</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-04-19</discovery>
      <entry>2026-04-22</entry>
      <modified>2026-05-02</modified>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="128951d0-3df0-11f1-bb07-bc241121aa0a">
    <topic>FreeBSD -- Missing large page handling in pmap_pkru_update_range()</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
	<name>FreeBSD-kernel</name>
	<range><ge>15.0</ge><lt>15.0_6</lt></range>
	<range><ge>14.4</ge><lt>14.4_2</lt></range>
	<range><ge>14.3</ge><lt>14.3_11</lt></range>
	<range><ge>13.5</ge><lt>13.5_12</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<h1>Problem Description:</h1>
	  <p>In order to apply a particular protection key to an address
	  range, the kernel must update the corresponding page table entries.
	  The subroutine which handled this failed to take into account the
	  presence of 1GB largepage mappings created using the
	  shm_create_largepage(3) interface.  In particular, it would always
	  treat a page directory page entry as pointing to another page table
	  page.</p>
	<h1>Impact:</h1>
	  <p>The bug can be abused by an unprivileged user to cause
	  pmap_pkru_update_range() to treat userspace memory as a page table
	  page, and thus overwrite memory to which the application would
	  otherwise not have access.</p>
      </body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-6386</cvename>
      <freebsdsa>SA-26:11.amd64</freebsdsa>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-04-21</discovery>
      <entry>2026-04-22</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="971b5528-3def-11f1-bb07-bc241121aa0a">
    <topic>FreeBSD -- Kernel use-after-free bug in the TIOCNOTTY handler</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
	<name>FreeBSD-kernel</name>
	<range><ge>15.0</ge><lt>15.0_6</lt></range>
	<range><ge>14.4</ge><lt>14.4_2</lt></range>
	<range><ge>14.3</ge><lt>14.3_11</lt></range>
	<range><ge>13.5</ge><lt>13.5_12</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<h1>Problem Description:</h1>
	  <p>The implementation of TIOCNOTTY failed to clear a back-pointer
	  from the structure representing the controlling terminal to the
	  calling process' session.  If the invoking process then exits, the
	  terminal structure may end up containing a pointer to freed memory.</p>
	<h1>Impact:</h1>
	  <p>A malicious process can abuse the dangling pointer to grant
	  itself root privileges.</p>
      </body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-5398</cvename>
      <freebsdsa>SA-26:10.tty</freebsdsa>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-04-21</discovery>
      <entry>2026-04-22</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="c4972d4f-3d93-11f1-9073-b42e991fc52e">
    <topic>Mozilla -- Integer overflow</topic>
    <affects>
    <package>
	<name>firefox</name>
	<range><lt>148.0.0,2</lt></range>
    </package>
    <package>
	<name>firefox-esr</name>
	<range><lt>140.8.0,2</lt></range>
    </package>
    <package>
	<name>thunderbird</name>
	<range><lt>148.0.0</lt></range>
    </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2009552 reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2009552">
	  <p>Integer overflow in the Libraries component in NSS.</p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-2781</cvename>
      <url>https://cveawg.mitre.org/api/cve/CVE-2026-2781</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-02-24</discovery>
      <entry>2026-04-21</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="82064ab5-3d76-11f1-89ab-901b0e9408dc">
    <topic>ejabberd -- Potential DDoS in XML Parser</topic>
    <affects>
<package>
<name>ejabberd</name>
<range><lt>26.04</lt></range>
</package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>ejabberd team reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://www.process-one.net/blog/ejabberd-26-04/">
	  <p>This release adds new options that limit max memory used
	  by XML parser used to process XMPP payloads, to prevent
	  potential Denial of Service attack. The default values for
	  pre-auth provide sufficient protection for ejabberd against
	  non-authenticated users on c2s and s2s, so there is no need
	  to change your configuration.</p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <url>https://www.process-one.net/blog/ejabberd-26-04/</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-04-20</discovery>
      <entry>2026-04-21</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="0d8b1126-0864-4934-b63f-c713526ead32">
    <topic>zeek -- potential DoS vulnerabilities</topic>
    <affects>
<package>
<name>zeek</name>
<range><lt>8.0.7</lt></range>
</package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>Tim Wojtulewicz of Corelight reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://github.com/zeek/zeek/releases/tag/v8.0.7">
	  <p>A series of DNS messages containing long DNS compression
	  chains can cause Zeek to spend a long time processing
	  packets and potentially crash. Due to the fact that these
	  packets can be received from remote hosts, this is a DoS
	  risk. </p>
	  <p>A specially-crafted LDAP search request can cause Zeek
	  to spend a long time processing the packet, resulting in
	  Zeek silently dropping the LDAP analyzer for the connection.
	  Due to the fact that these packets can be received from
	  remote hosts, this is an evasion risk. </p>
	  <p>A specially-crafted series of ASN.1 messages in LDAP
	  packets can cause Zeek to spend a long time processing
	  the packets, resulting in Zeek silently dropping the LDAP
	  analyzer for the connection.  Due to the fact that these
	  packets can be received from remote hosts, this is an
	  evasion risk. </p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <url>https://github.com/zeek/zeek/releases/tag/v8.0.7</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-04-20</discovery>
      <entry>2026-04-20</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="7b83af27-3a86-11f1-90cd-41d47652b1c2">
    <topic>OpenEXR -- several integer overflow vulnerabilities</topic>
    <affects>
	<package>
	    <name>openexr</name>
	    <range><lt>3.4.10</lt></range>
	</package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>Cary Phillips reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://github.com/AcademySoftwareFoundation/openexr/releases/tag/v3.3.10">
	    <p>OpenEXR 3.4.10 is a patch release that addresses the following security vulnerabilities:</p>
	    <ul><li>CVE-2026-39886 HTJ2K Signed Integer Overflow in ht_undo_impl()</li>
		<li>CVE-2026-40244 Integer overflow in DWA setupChannelData planarUncRle pointer arithmetic (missed variant of CVE-2026-34589)</li>
		<li>CVE-2026-40250 Integer overflow in DWA decoder outBufferEnd pointer arithmetic (missed variant of CVE-2026-34589)</li></ul>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-39886</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-40244</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-40250</cvename>
      <url>https://github.com/AcademySoftwareFoundation/openexr/releases/tag/v3.4.10</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-04-17</discovery>
      <entry>2026-04-19</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="6f1c19bf-3b29-11f1-930b-98b78501ef2a">
    <topic>xrdp -- Multiple vulnerabilities</topic>
    <affects>
    <package>
      <name>xrdp</name>
      <range><lt>0.10.6,1</lt></range>
    </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>xrdp project reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://github.com/neutrinolabs/xrdp/releases/tag/v0.10.6">
	  <p>This release includes 8 security fixes:</p>
	  <ul>
	    <li>CVE-2026-32105</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-32107</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-32623</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-32624</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-33145</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-32516</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-32689</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-35512</li>
	  </ul>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-32105</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-32107</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-32623</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-32624</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-33145</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-32516</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-32689</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-35512</cvename>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-03-03</discovery>
      <entry>2026-04-18</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="6a0aa20d-399f-11f1-8626-901b0edee044">
    <topic>py-strawberry-graphql -- Multiple vulnerabilities</topic>
    <affects>
    <package>
	<name>py310-strawberry-graphql</name>
	<name>py311-strawberry-graphql</name>
	<name>py312-strawberry-graphql</name>
	<name>py313-strawberry-graphql</name>
	<name>py313t-strawberry-graphql</name>
	<name>py314-strawberry-graphql</name>
	<range><lt>0.312.3</lt></range>
    </package>
    <package>
	<name>py310-dj52-strawberry-graphql</name>
	<name>py311-dj52-strawberry-graphql</name>
	<name>py312-dj52-strawberry-graphql</name>
	<name>py313-dj52-strawberry-graphql</name>
	<name>py313t-dj52-strawberry-graphql</name>
	<name>py314-dj52-strawberry-graphql</name>
	<range><lt>0.312.3</lt></range>
    </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>The Strawberry GraphQL project reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://github.com/strawberry-graphql/strawberry/security/advisories/GHSA-vpwc-v33q-mq89">
	<p>Strawberry up until version 0.312.3 is vulnerable to an authentication bypass
	on WebSocket subscription endpoints. The legacy graphql-ws subprotocol handler
	does not verify that a 'connection_init' handshake has been completed before
	processing start (subscription) messages. This allows a remote attacker to skip
	the 'on_ws_connect' authentication hook entirely by connecting with the
	graphql-ws subprotocol and sending a start message directly, without ever
	sending 'connection_init'.

	The graphql-transport-ws subprotocol handler is not affected, as it correctly
	gates subscription operations on a connection_acknowledged flag. However, both
	subprotocols are enabled by default in all framework integrations that support
	websockets, and the subprotocol is selected by the client via the
	Sec-WebSocket-Protocol header.

	Any application relying on 'on_ws_connect' for authentication or authorization
	is affected.</p>
	</blockquote>
	<blockquote cite="https://github.com/strawberry-graphql/strawberry/security/advisories/GHSA-hv3w-m4g2-5x77">
	<p>Strawberry GraphQL's WebSocket subscription handlers for both the
	'graphql-transport-ws' and legacy 'graphql-ws' protocols allocate an
	asyncio.Task and associated Operation object for every incoming subscribe
	message without enforcing any limit on the number of active subscriptions per
	connection.

	An unauthenticated attacker can open a single WebSocket connection, send
	connection_init, and then flood subscribe messages with unique IDs. Each
	message unconditionally spawns a new 'asyncio.Task' and async generator,
	causing linear memory growth and event loop saturation. This leads to server
	degradation or an OOM crash.</p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-35523</cvename>
      <url>https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-35523</url>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-35526</cvename>
      <url>https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-35526</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-04-04</discovery>
      <entry>2026-04-17</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="6ae8f9e5-3a26-11f1-b60b-b42e991fc52e">
    <topic>Mozilla -- Memory safety bugs</topic>
    <affects>
    <package>
	<name>firefox</name>
	<range><lt>149.0.2,2</lt></range>
    </package>
    <package>
	<name>firefox-esr</name>
	<range><lt>140.9.1,2</lt></range>
    </package>
    <package>
	<name>thunderbird</name>
	<range><lt>149.0.2</lt></range>
    </package>
    <package>
	<name>thunderbird-esr</name>
	<range><lt>140.9.1</lt></range>
    </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>Mozilla reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/buglist.cgi?bug_id=2021894%2C2022225%2C2022252%2C2022294%2C2023007%2C2023130%2C2023191%2C2023364%2C2023829%2C2024074%2C2024417%2C2024433%2C2024436%2C2024437%2C2024453%2C2024461%2C2024462%2C2024472%2C2024474%2C2024477%2C2025364%2C2025401%2C2025402%2C2025472%2C2026287%2C2026299%2C2026305%2C2026426">
	<p>
	Memory safety bugs present in Firefox ESR, Firefox ESR ,
	Thunderbird ESR, and Thunderbird. Some of these bugs
	showed evidence of memory corruption and we presume that
	with enough effort some of these could have been exploited
	  to run arbitrary code.
	</p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-5731</cvename>
      <url>https://cveawg.mitre.org/api/cve/CVE-2026-5731</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-04-07</discovery>
      <entry>2026-04-17</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="9c8c00ce-3642-11f1-bd03-3c7c3fba4204">
    <topic>go-ethereum -- vulnerabilities</topic>
    <affects>
    <package>
	<name>go-ethereum</name>
	<range><lt>1.17.0</lt></range>
    </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>https://github.com/ethereum/go-ethereum/security/advisories reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://github.com/ethereum/go-ethereum/security/advisories">
	  <ul>
	    <li>DoS via malicious p2p message (CVE-2026-26313)</li>
	    <li>DoS via malicious p2p message (CVE-2026-26314)</li>
	    <li>Improper ECIES Public Key Validation in RLPx Handshake (CVE-2026-26315)</li>
	  </ul>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-26313</cvename>
      <url>https://github.com/ethereum/go-ethereum/security/advisories/GHSA-689v-6xwf-5jf3</url>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-26314</cvename>
      <url>https://github.com/ethereum/go-ethereum/security/advisories/GHSA-2gjw-fg97-vg3r</url>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-26315</cvename>
      <url>https://github.com/ethereum/go-ethereum/security/advisories/GHSA-m6j8-rg6r-7mv8</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-02-17</discovery>
      <entry>2026-04-12</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="d93c247b-4dba-43ce-b5c0-ac5bd03bea8d">
    <topic>chromium -- security fixes</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
       <name>chromium</name>
       <range><lt>147.0.7727.101</lt></range>
      </package>
      <package>
       <name>ungoogled-chromium</name>
       <range><lt>147.0.7727.101</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
       <p>Chrome Releases reports:</p>
       <blockquote cite="https://chromereleases.googleblog.com/2026/04/stable-channel-update-for-desktop_15.html">
	 <p>This update includes 31 security fixes:</p>
	 <ul>
	    <li>[490170083] Critical CVE-2026-6296: Heap buffer overflow in ANGLE. Reported by cinzinga on 2026-03-05</li>
	    <li>[493628982] Critical CVE-2026-6297: Use after free in Proxy. Reported by heapracer on 2026-03-17</li>
	    <li>[495700484] Critical CVE-2026-6298: Heap buffer overflow in Skia. Reported by 86ac1f1587b71893ed2ad792cd7dde32 on 2026-03-24</li>
	    <li>[497053588] Critical CVE-2026-6299: Use after free in Prerender. Reported by Google on 2026-03-28</li>
	    <li>[497724498] Critical CVE-2026-6358: Use after free in XR. Reported by Jihyeon Jeong (Compsec Lab, Seoul National University / Research Intern) on 2026-03-30</li>
	    <li>[490251701] High CVE-2026-6359: Use after free in Video. Reported by 86ac1f1587b71893ed2ad792cd7dde32 on 2026-03-06</li>
	    <li>[491994185] High CVE-2026-6300: Use after free in CSS. Reported by c6eed09fc8b174b0f3eebedcceb1e792 on 2026-03-12</li>
	    <li>[495273999] High CVE-2026-6301: Type Confusion in Turbofan. Reported by qymag1c on 2026-03-23</li>
	    <li>[495477995] High CVE-2026-6302: Use after free in Video. Reported by Syn4pse on 2026-03-24</li>
	    <li>[496282147] High CVE-2026-6303: Use after free in Codecs. Reported by Google on 2026-03-25</li>
	    <li>[496393742] High CVE-2026-6304: Use after free in Graphite. Reported by Google on 2026-03-26</li>
	    <li>[496618639] High CVE-2026-6305: Heap buffer overflow in PDFium. Reported by 86ac1f1587b71893ed2ad792cd7dde32 on 2026-03-26</li>
	    <li>[496907110] High CVE-2026-6306: Heap buffer overflow in PDFium. Reported by 86ac1f1587b71893ed2ad792cd7dde32 on 2026-03-27</li>
	    <li>[497404188] High CVE-2026-6307: Type Confusion in Turbofan. Reported by Project WhatForLunch (@pjwhatforlunch) on 2026-03-29</li>
	    <li>[497412658] High CVE-2026-6308: Out of bounds read in Media. Reported by Google on 2026-03-29</li>
	    <li>[497846428] High CVE-2026-6309: Use after free in Viz. Reported by Google on 2026-03-30</li>
	    <li>[497880137] High CVE-2026-6360: Use after free in FileSystem. Reported by asjidkalam on 2026-03-31</li>
	    <li>[497969820] High CVE-2026-6310: Use after free in Dawn. Reported by Google on 2026-03-31</li>
	    <li>[498201025] High CVE-2026-6311: Uninitialized Use in Accessibility. Reported by Google on 2026-03-31</li>
	    <li>[498269651] High CVE-2026-6312: Insufficient policy enforcement in Passwords. Reported by Google on 2026-03-31</li>
	    <li>[498765210] High CVE-2026-6313: Insufficient policy enforcement in CORS. Reported by Google on 2026-04-02</li>
	    <li>[498782145] High CVE-2026-6314: Out of bounds write in GPU. Reported by Google on 2026-04-02</li>
	    <li>[499247910] High CVE-2026-6315: Use after free in Permissions. Reported by Google on 2026-04-03</li>
	    <li>[499384399] High CVE-2026-6316: Use after free in Forms. Reported by Google on 2026-04-03</li>
	    <li>[500036290] High CVE-2026-6361: Heap buffer overflow in PDFium. Reported by Google on 2026-04-06</li>
	    <li>[500066234] High CVE-2026-6362: Use after free in Codecs. Reported by c6eed09fc8b174b0f3eebedcceb1e792 on 2026-04-07</li>
	    <li>[500091052] High CVE-2026-6317: Use after free in Cast. Reported by Google on 2026-04-06</li>
	    <li>[495751197] Medium CVE-2026-6363: Type Confusion in V8. Reported by Google on 2026-03-24</li>
	    <li>[495996858] Medium CVE-2026-6318: Use after free in Codecs. Reported by Syn4pse on 2026-03-25</li>
	    <li>[499018889] Medium CVE-2026-6319: Use after free in Payments. Reported by pwn2addr on 2026-04-02</li>
	    <li>[502103414] Medium CVE-2026-6364: Out of bounds read in Skia. Reported by Google Threat Intelligence on 2026-04-13</li>
	 </ul>
       </blockquote>
      </body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-6296</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-6297</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-6298</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-6299</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-6358</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-6359</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-6300</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-6301</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-6302</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-6303</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-6304</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-6305</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-6306</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-6307</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-6308</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-6309</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-6360</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-6310</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-6311</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-6312</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-6313</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-6314</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-6315</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-6316</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-6361</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-6362</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-6317</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-6363</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-6318</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-6319</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-6364</cvename>
      <url>https://chromereleases.googleblog.com/2026/04/stable-channel-update-for-desktop_15.html</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-04-15</discovery>
      <entry>2026-04-16</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="7a7a17b2-381c-11f1-a663-10ffe07f9334">
    <topic>PHP Composer -- Multiple vulnerabilities</topic>
    <affects>
<package>
<name>php82-composer</name>
<name>php83-composer</name>
<name>php84-composer</name>
<name>php85-composer</name>
<range><lt>2.9.6</lt></range>
</package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>Composer project reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://github.com/composer/composer/releases/tag/2.9.6">
	  <p>Fixed command injection via malicious Perforce reference (GHSA-gqw4-4w2p-838q / CVE-2026-40261)</p>
    <p>Fixed command injection via malicious Perforce repository definition (GHSA-wg36-wvj6-r67p / CVE-2026-40176)</p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-40261</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-40176</cvename>
      <url>https://github.com/composer/composer/releases/tag/2.9.6</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-04-14</discovery>
      <entry>2026-04-14</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="099423d1-3815-11f1-a284-589cfc10a551">
    <topic>xwayland -- Multiple vulnerabilities</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
	<name>xwayland</name>
	<range><lt>24.1.10,1</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>X.Org project reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-announce/2026-April/003677.html">
	  <p>Multiple issues have been found in the X server and Xwayland
	     implementations published by X.Org for which we are releasing
	     security fixes for in xorg-server-21.1.22 and xwayland-24.1.10.</p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-33999</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-34000</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-34001</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-34002</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-34003</cvename>
      <url>https://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-announce/2026-April/003677.html</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-04-14</discovery>
      <entry>2026-04-14</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="7b6463c6-3813-11f1-a284-589cfc10a551">
    <topic>xorg-server -- Multiple vulnerabilities</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
	<name>xorg-server</name>
	<range><lt>21.1.22,1</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>X.Org project reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-announce/2026-April/003677.html">
	  <p>Multiple issues have been found in the X server and Xwayland
	     implementations published by X.Org for which we are releasing
	     security fixes for in xorg-server-21.1.22 and xwayland-24.1.10.</p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-33999</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-34000</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-34001</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-34002</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-34003</cvename>
      <url>https://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-announce/2026-April/003677.html</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-04-14</discovery>
      <entry>2026-04-14</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="cf75f572-378a-11f1-a119-e36228bfe7d4">
    <topic>python -- more webbrowser.open() command injection vulnerabilities</topic>
    <affects>
      <package><name>python310</name><range><lt>3.10.20_4</lt></range></package>
      <package><name>python311</name><range><lt>3.11.15_4</lt></range></package>
      <package><name>python312</name><range><lt>3.12.13_4</lt></range></package>
      <package><name>python313</name><range><lt>3.13.14</lt></range></package>
      <package><name>python313t</name><range><lt>3.13.14</lt></range></package>
      <package><name>python314</name><range><lt>3.14.4_2</lt></range></package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>Seth Larson reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://mail.python.org/archives/list/security-announce@python.org/thread/JQDUNJVB4AQNTJECSUKOBDU3XCJIPSE5/">
	  <p>[CVE-2026-4786] Incomplete mitigation of CVE-2026-4519, %action expansion for command injection to webbrowser.open()</p>
	  <p>There is a HIGH severity vulnerability affecting CPython.</p>
	  <p>Mitgation of CVE-2026-4519 was incomplete. If the URL contained "%action"
	   the mitigation could be bypassed for certain browser types the
	   "webbrowser.open()" API could have commands injected into the underlying
	    shell. See CVE-2026-4519 for details.</p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-4786</cvename>
      <url>https://mail.python.org/archives/list/security-announce@python.org/thread/JQDUNJVB4AQNTJECSUKOBDU3XCJIPSE5/</url>
      <url>https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-4786</url>
      <url>https://github.com/python/cpython/issues/148169</url>
      <url>https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/148170</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-04-06</discovery>
      <entry>2026-04-13</entry>
      <modified>2026-08-09</modified>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="b8e9f33c-375d-11f1-a119-e36228bfe7d4">
    <topic>Python -- use-after-free vulnerability in decompressors under memory pressure</topic>
    <affects>
      <package><name>python310</name><range><lt>3.10.20_3</lt></range></package>
      <package><name>python311</name><range><lt>3.11.15_4</lt></range></package>
      <package><name>python312</name><range><lt>3.12.13_4</lt></range></package>
      <package><name>python313</name><range><lt>3.13.14</lt></range></package>
      <package><name>python313t</name><range><lt>3.13.14</lt></range></package>
      <package><name>python314</name><range><lt>3.14.4_1</lt></range></package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>Seth Larson reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://mail.python.org/archives/list/security-announce@python.org/thread/HTWB2Z6KT5QQX4RYEZAFININDHNOSIF3/">
	  <p>There is a CRITICAL severity vulnerability affecting CPython.</p>
	  <p>Use-after-free (UAF) was possible in the lzma.LZMADecompressor,
	    bz2.BZ2Decompressor, and gzip.GzipFile when a memory allocation fails
	    with a MemoryError and the decompression instance is re-used. This
	    scenario can be triggered if the process is under memory pressure. The fix
	    cleans up the dangling pointer in this specific error condition.</p>
	  <p>The vulnerability is only present if the program re-uses decompressor
	    instances across multiple decompression calls even after a MemoryError is
	    raised during decompression. Using the helper functions to one-shot
	    decompress data such as lzma.decompress(), bz2.decompress(),
	    gzip.decompress(), and zlib.decompress() are not affected as a new
	    decompressor instance is created for each call. If the decompressor
	    instance is not re-used after an error condition, this usage is similarly
	    not vulnerable.</p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-6100</cvename>
      <url>https://mail.python.org/archives/list/security-announce@python.org/thread/HTWB2Z6KT5QQX4RYEZAFININDHNOSIF3/</url>
      <url>https://github.com/python/cpython/issues/148395</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-04-11</discovery>
      <entry>2026-04-13</entry>
      <modified>2026-08-09</modified>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="57f31f61-36a1-11f1-9839-8447094a420f">
    <topic>Vaultwarden -- Multiple vulnerabilities</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
	<name>vaultwarden</name>
	<range><lt>1.35.5</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>The Vaultwarden project reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://github.com/dani-garcia/vaultwarden/releases/tag/1.35.5">
	  <p>GHSA-937x-3j8m-7w7p Unconfirmed Owner Can Purge Entire Organization Vault.</p>
	  <p>GHSA-569v-845w-g82p Cross-Org Group Binding Enables Unauthorized Read And Write Access Into Another Organization</p>
	  <p>GHSA-6j4w-g4jh-xjfx Refresh tokens not invalidated on security stamp rotation</p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <url>https://github.com/dani-garcia/vaultwarden/releases/tag/1.35.5</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-04-12</discovery>
      <entry>2026-04-12</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="30bda1c3-369b-11f1-b51c-6dd25bec137b">
    <topic>Python -- HTTP proxy CONNECT tunnel does not sanitize CR/LF</topic>
    <affects>
      <package><name>python310</name><range><lt>3.10.21</lt></range></package>
      <package><name>python311</name><range><lt>3.11.16</lt></range></package>
      <package><name>python312</name><range><lt>3.12.13_3</lt></range></package>
      <package><name>python313</name><range><lt>3.13.14</lt></range></package>
      <package><name>python313t</name><range><lt>3.13.14</lt></range></package>
      <package><name>python314</name><range><lt>3.14.4</lt></range></package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>Seth Larson reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://github.com/python/cpython/issues/146211">
	  <p>HTTP proxy via "CONNECT" tunneling doesn't sanitize CR/LF (CVE-2026-1502).</p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-1502</cvename>
      <url>https://github.com/python/cpython/issues/146211</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-03-20</discovery>
      <entry>2026-04-12</entry>
      <modified>2026-08-14</modified>
    </dates>
   </vuln>

  <vuln vid="5ec4dcf6-3588-11f1-b51c-6dd25bec137b">
    <topic>Python -- configparser vulnerable to excessive CPU use</topic>
    <affects>
      <package><name>python310</name><range><lt>3.10.21</lt></range></package>
      <package><name>python311</name><range><lt>3.11.16</lt></range></package>
      <package><name>python312</name><range><lt>3.12.13_4</lt></range></package>
      <package><name>python313</name><range><lt>3.13.14</lt></range></package>
      <package><name>python313t</name><range><lt>3.13.14</lt></range></package>
      <package><name>python314</name><range><lt>3.14.4</lt></range></package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>Stan Ulbrych reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://github.com/python/cpython/issues/146333">
	  <p>configparser.RawConfigParser.{OPTCRE,OPTCRE_NV} regexes [are] vulnerable to quadratic backtracking.</p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <url>https://github.com/python/cpython/issues/146333</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-03-23</discovery>
      <entry>2026-04-12</entry>
      <modified>2026-08-14</modified>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="8d549898-3598-11f1-a8bc-3c7c3fba4204">
    <topic>py-ormar -- vulnerabilities</topic>
    <affects>
    <package>
	<name>py310-ormar</name>
	<name>py311-ormar</name>
	<name>py312-ormar</name>
	<name>py313-ormar</name>
	<name>py313t-ormar</name>
	<name>py314-ormar</name>
	<range><lt>0.23.1</lt></range>
    </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>https://github.com/ormar-orm/ormar/security/advisories reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://github.com/collerek/ormar/security/advisories">
	  <ul>
	    <li>SQL Injection in aggregate functions min() and max()</li>
	    <li>Pydantic Validation Bypass via __pk_only__ and __excluded__ Kwargs Injection in Model Constructor</li>
	  </ul>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-26198</cvename>
      <url>https://github.com/ormar-orm/ormar/security/advisories/GHSA-xxh2-68g9-8jqr</url>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-27953</cvename>
      <url>https://github.com/ormar-orm/ormar/security/advisories/GHSA-f964-whrq-44h8</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-02-22</discovery>
      <entry>2026-04-11</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="766bb9b5-357f-11f1-98f0-00a098b42aeb">
    <topic>(lib)tiff -- Integer Overflow or Wraparound</topic>
    <affects>
    <package>
	<name>tiff</name>
	<range><lt>4.7.1_1</lt></range>
    </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>PrymEvol and Quang Luong reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-4775">
	  <p>A flaw was found in the libtiff library.  A remote attacker could
	     exploit a signed integer overflow vulnerability in the
	     putcontig8bitYCbCr44tile function by providing a specially crafted
	     TIFF file.  This flaw can lead to an out-of-bounds heap write due
	     to incorrect memory pointer calculations, potentially causing a
	     denial of service (application crash) or arbitrary code execution.
	  </p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-4775</cvename>
      <url>https://cveawg.mitre.org/api/cve/CVE-2026-4775</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-03-24</discovery>
      <entry>2026-04-11</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="431c2753-3503-11f1-bc6d-3c7c3fba4204">
    <topic>DNSdist -- vulnerabilities</topic>
    <affects>
    <package>
	<name>dnsdist</name>
	<range><lt>2.0.3</lt></range>
    </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>https://www.dnsdist.org/security-advisories/powerdns-advisory-for-dnsdist-2026-02.html reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://www.dnsdist.org/security-advisories/powerdns-advisory-for-dnsdist-2026-02.html">
	  <ul>
	    <li>CVE-2026-0396: HTML injection in the web dashboard</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-0397: Information disclosure via CORS misconfiguration</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-24028: Out-of-bounds read when parsing DNS packets via Lua</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-24029: DNS over HTTPS ACL bypass</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-24030: Unbounded memory allocation for DoQ and DoH3</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-27853: Out-of-bounds write when rewriting large DNS packets</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-27854: Use after free when parsing EDNS options in Lua</li>
	  </ul>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-0396</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-0397</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-24028</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-24029</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-24030</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-27853</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-27854</cvename>
      <url>https://www.dnsdist.org/security-advisories/powerdns-advisory-for-dnsdist-2026-02.html</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-03-31</discovery>
      <entry>2026-04-10</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="d77bd2f5-34f0-11f1-bc6d-3c7c3fba4204">
    <topic>Mbed TLS -- vulnerabilities</topic>
    <affects>
    <package>
	<name>mbedtls3</name>
	<range><lt>3.6.6</lt></range>
    </package>
    <package>
	<name>mbedtls4</name>
	<range><lt>4.1.0</lt></range>
    </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>https://mbed-tls.readthedocs.io/en/latest/security-advisories/ reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://mbed-tls.readthedocs.io/en/latest/security-advisories/">
	  <ul>
	    <li>Client impersonation while resuming a TLS 1.3 session (CVE-2026-34873)</li>
	    <li>Entropy on Linux can fall back to /dev/urandom (CVE-2026-34871)</li>
	    <li>PSA random generator cloning (CVE-2026-25835)</li>
	    <li>Compiler-induced constant-time violations (CVE-2025-66442)</li>
	    <li>Null pointer dereference when setting a distinguished name (CVE-2026-34874)</li>
	    <li>Buffer overflow in FFDH public key export (CVE-2026-34875)</li>
	    <li>FFDH: lack of contributory behaviour due to improper input validation (CVE-2026-34872)</li>
	    <li>Signature Algorithm Injection (CVE-2026-25834)</li>
	    <li>CCM multipart finish tag-length validation bypass (CVE-2026-34876)</li>
	    <li>Risk of insufficient protection of serialized session or context data leading to potential memory safety issues (CVE-2026-34877)</li>
	    <li>Buffer underflow in x509_inet_pton_ipv6() (CVE-2026-25833)</li>
	  </ul>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-34873</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-34871</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-25835</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2025-66442</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-34874</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-34875</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-34872</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-25834</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-34876</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-34877</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-25833</cvename>
      <url>https://mbed-tls.readthedocs.io/en/latest/security-advisories/</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-03-31</discovery>
      <entry>2026-04-10</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="4b727a1a-5034-42b4-b29b-2289389f4ba8">
    <topic>chromium -- security fixes</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
       <name>chromium</name>
       <range><lt>147.0.7727.55</lt></range>
      </package>
      <package>
       <name>ungoogled-chromium</name>
       <range><lt>147.0.7727.55</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
       <p>Chrome Releases reports:</p>
       <blockquote cite="https://chromereleases.googleblog.com/2026/04/stable-channel-update-for-desktop.html">
	 <p>This update includes multiple security fixes:</p>
	 <p>Critical:</p>
	 <ul>
	    <li>CVE-2026-5858: Heap buffer overflow in WebML.</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-5859: Integer overflow in WebML.</li>
	</ul>
	<p>High:</p>
	<ul>
	    <li>CVE-2026-5860: Use after free in WebRTC.</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-5861: Use after free in V8.</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-5862: Inappropriate implementation in V8.</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-5863: Inappropriate implementation in V8.</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-5864: Heap buffer overflow in WebAudio.</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-5865: Type Confusion in V8.</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-5866: Use after free in Media.</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-5867: Heap buffer overflow in WebML.</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-5868: Heap buffer overflow in ANGLE.</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-5869: Heap buffer overflow in WebML.</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-5870: Integer overflow in Skia.</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-5871: Type Confusion in V8.</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-5872: Use after free in Blink.</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-5873: Out of bounds read and write in V8.</li>
	</ul>
	<p>Medium:</p>
	<ul>
	    <li>CVE-2026-5874: Use after free in PrivateAI.</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-5875: Policy bypass in Blink.</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-5876: Side-channel information leakage in Navigation.</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-5877: Use after free in Navigation.</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-5878: Incorrect security UI in Blink.</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-5879: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in ANGLE.</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-5880: Incorrect security UI in browser UI.</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-5881: Policy bypass in LocalNetworkAccess.</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-5882: Incorrect security UI in Fullscreen.</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-5883: Use after free in Media.</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-5884: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Media.</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-5885: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in WebML.</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-5886: Out of bounds read in WebAudio.</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-5887: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Downloads.</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-5888: Uninitialized Use in WebCodecs.</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-5889: Cryptographic Flaw in PDFium.</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-5890: Race in WebCodecs.</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-5891: Insufficient policy enforcement in browser UI.</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-5892: Insufficient policy enforcement in PWAs.</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-5893: Race in V8.</li>
	</ul>
	<p>Low:</p>
	<ul>
	    <li>CVE-2026-5894: Inappropriate implementation in PDF.</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-5895: Incorrect security UI in Omnibox.</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-5896: Policy bypass in Audio.</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-5897: Incorrect security UI in Downloads.</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-5898: Incorrect security UI in Omnibox.</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-5899: Incorrect security UI in History Navigation.</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-5900: Policy bypass in Downloads.</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-5901: Policy bypass in DevTools.</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-5902: Race in Media.</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-5903: Policy bypass in IFrameSandbox.</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-5904: Use after free in V8.</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-5905: Incorrect security UI in Permissions.</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-5906: Incorrect security UI in Omnibox.</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-5907: Insufficient data validation in Media.</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-5908: Integer overflow in Media.</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-5909: Integer overflow in Media.</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-5910: Integer overflow in Media.</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-5911: Policy bypass in ServiceWorkers.</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-5912: Integer overflow in WebRTC.</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-5913: Out of bounds read in Blink.</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-5914: Type Confusion in CSS.</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-5915: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in WebML.</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-5918: Inappropriate implementation in Navigation.</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-5919: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in WebSockets.</li>
	 </ul>
       </blockquote>
      </body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-5858</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-5859</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-5860</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-5861</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-5862</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-5863</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-5864</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-5865</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-5866</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-5867</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-5868</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-5869</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-5870</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-5871</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-5872</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-5873</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-5874</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-5875</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-5876</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-5877</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-5878</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-5879</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-5880</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-5881</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-5882</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-5883</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-5884</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-5885</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-5886</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-5887</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-5888</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-5889</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-5890</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-5891</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-5892</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-5893</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-5894</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-5895</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-5896</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-5897</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-5898</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-5899</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-5900</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-5901</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-5902</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-5903</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-5904</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-5905</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-5906</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-5907</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-5908</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-5909</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-5910</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-5911</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-5912</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-5913</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-5914</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-5915</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-5918</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-5919</cvename>
      <url>https://chromereleases.googleblog.com/2026/04/stable-channel-update-for-desktop.html</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-04-07</discovery>
      <entry>2026-04-10</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="359d8e42-33fb-11f1-8ac1-b42e991fc52e">
    <topic>Mozilla -- Memory safety bugs</topic>
    <affects>
    <package>
	<name>firefox</name>
	<range><lt>149.0.2,2</lt></range>
    </package>
    <package>
	<name>thunderbird</name>
	<range><lt>149.0.2</lt></range>
    </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/buglist.cgi?bug_id=2025475%2C2025477 reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/buglist.cgi?bug_id=2025475%2C2025477">
	<p>
	  Memory safety bugs present in Firefox 149.0.1 and
	  Thunderbird 149.0.1. Some of these bugs showed evidence
	  of memory corruption and we presume that with enough
	  effort some of these could have been exploited to run
	  arbitrary code.
	</p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-5735</cvename>
      <url>https://cveawg.mitre.org/api/cve/CVE-2026-5735</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-04-07</discovery>
      <entry>2026-04-09</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="33e56419-33fb-11f1-8ac1-b42e991fc52e">
    <topic>Mozilla -- Memory safety bugs</topic>
    <affects>
    <package>
	<name>firefox</name>
	<range><lt>149.0.2,2</lt></range>
    </package>
    <package>
	<name>firefox-esr</name>
	<range><lt>140.9.1,2</lt></range>
    </package>
    <package>
	<name>thunderbird</name>
	<range><lt>140.9.1</lt></range>
    </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/buglist.cgi?bug_id=2022369%2C2023026%2C2023545%2C2023555%2C2023958%2C2025422%2C2025468%2C2025492%2C2025505 reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/buglist.cgi?bug_id=2022369%2C2023026%2C2023545%2C2023555%2C2023958%2C2025422%2C2025468%2C2025492%2C2025505">
	<p>
	  Memory safety bugs present in Firefox ESR 140.9.0,
	  Thunderbird ESR 140.9.0, Firefox 149.0.1 and Thunderbird
	  149.0.1. Some of these bugs showed evidence of memory
	  corruption and we presume that with enough effort some of
	  these could have been exploited to run arbitrary code.
	  </p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-5734</cvename>
      <url>https://cveawg.mitre.org/api/cve/CVE-2026-5734</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-04-07</discovery>
      <entry>2026-04-09</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="322bd409-33fb-11f1-8ac1-b42e991fc52e">
    <topic>Mozilla -- Incorrect boundary conditions</topic>
    <affects>
    <package>
	<name>firefox</name>
	<range><lt>149.0.2,2</lt></range>
    </package>
    <package>
	<name>thunderbird</name>
	<range><lt>149.0.2</lt></range>
    </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2022554 reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2022554">
	<p>
	  Incorrect boundary conditions in the Graphics: WebGPU
	  component.
	</p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-5733</cvename>
      <url>https://cveawg.mitre.org/api/cve/CVE-2026-5733</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-04-07</discovery>
      <entry>2026-04-09</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="30522580-33fb-11f1-8ac1-b42e991fc52e">
    <topic>Mozilla -- Incorrect boundary conditions, integer overflow</topic>
    <affects>
    <package>
	<name>firefox</name>
	<range><lt>149.0.2,2</lt></range>
    </package>
    <package>
	<name>firefox-esr</name>
	<range><lt>140.9.1,2</lt></range>
    </package>
    <package>
	<name>thunderbird</name>
	<range><lt>149.0.2</lt></range>
    </package>
    <package>
	<name>thunderbird</name>
	<range><lt>140.9.1</lt></range>
    </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2017867 reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2017867">
	<p>
	  Incorrect boundary conditions, integer overflow in the
	  Graphics: Text component.
	</p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-5732</cvename>
      <url>https://cveawg.mitre.org/api/cve/CVE-2026-5732</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-04-07</discovery>
      <entry>2026-04-09</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="099d4998-33cc-11f1-a7d1-2cf05da270f3">
    <topic>Gitlab -- vulnerabilities</topic>
    <affects>
<package>
<name>gitlab-ce</name>
<name>gitlab-ee</name>
<range><ge>18.10.0</ge><lt>18.10.3</lt></range>
<range><ge>18.9.0</ge><lt>18.9.5</lt></range>
<range><ge>11.3.0</ge><lt>18.8.9</lt></range>
</package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>Gitlab reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://about.gitlab.com/releases/2026/04/08/patch-release-gitlab-18-10-3-released/">
	  <p>Exposed Method issue in websocket connections impacts GitLab CE/EE</p>
	  <p>Denial of Service issue in Terraform state lock API impacts GitLab CE/EE</p>
	  <p>Denial of Service issue in GraphQL API impacts GitLab CE/EE</p>
	  <p>Denial of Service issue in CSV import impacts GitLab CE/EE</p>
	  <p>Denial of Service issue in GraphQL SBOM API impacts GitLab EE</p>
	  <p>Code Injection issue in Code Quality reports impacts GitLab EE</p>
	  <p>Cross-site Scripting issue in analytics dashboards impacts GitLab EE</p>
	  <p>Incorrect Authorization issue in vulnerability flags AI detection API impacts GitLab EE</p>
	  <p>Information Disclosure issue in certain GraphQl query impacts GitLab EE</p>
	  <p>Improper Access Control issue in Environments API impacts GitLab EE</p>
	  <p>Information Disclosure issue in CSV export impacts GitLab CE/EE</p>
	  <p>Missing Authorization issue in custom role permissions impacts GitLab CE/EE</p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-5173</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-1092</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2025-12664</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-1403</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-1101</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-1516</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-4332</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-2619</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2025-9484</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-1752</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-2104</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-4916</cvename>
      <url>https://about.gitlab.com/releases/2026/04/08/patch-release-gitlab-18-10-3-released/</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-04-08</discovery>
      <entry>2026-04-09</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="c7a52cee-32ab-11f1-9839-8447094a420f">
    <topic>OpenSSL -- Multiple vulnerabilities</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
	<name>openssl</name>
	<range><lt>3.0.20,1</lt></range>
      </package>
      <package>
	<name>openssl34</name>
	<range><lt>3.4.5</lt></range>
      </package>
      <package>
	<name>openssl35</name>
	<range><lt>3.5.6</lt></range>
      </package>
      <package>
	<name>openssl36</name>
	<range><lt>3.6.2</lt></range>
      </package>
      <package>
	<name>openssl111</name>
	<range><lt>1.1.1zg</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>The OpenSSL project reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://openssl-library.org/news/secadv/20260407.txt">
	  <p>Seven vulnerabilities in OpenSSL library. Highest classification Moderate.</p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-31790</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-2637</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-28386</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-28387</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-28388</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-28389</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-28390</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-31789</cvename>
      <url>https://openssl-library.org/news/secadv/20260407.txt</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-04-07</discovery>
      <entry>2026-04-07</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="c08273b5-30e5-11f1-b9f2-b42e991fc52e">
    <topic>nghttp2 -- CWE-617: Reachable Assertion</topic>
    <affects>
    <package>
	<name>libnghttp2</name>
	<range><lt>1.68.1</lt></range>
    </package>
    <package>
	<name>nghttp2</name>
	<range><lt>1.68.1</lt></range>
    </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>https://github.com/nghttp2/nghttp2/security/advisories/GHSA-6933-cjhr-5qg6 reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://github.com/nghttp2/nghttp2/security/advisories/GHSA-6933-cjhr-5qg6">
	<p>
	nghttp2 is an implementation of the Hypertext Transfer
	Protocol version 2 in C. Prior to version 1.68.1, the
	nghttp2 library stops reading the incoming data when user
	facing public API `nghttp2_session_terminate_session` or
	`nghttp2_session_terminate_session2` is called by the
	application. They might be called internally by the
	library when it detects the situation that is subject to
	connection error. Due to the missing internal state
	validation, the library keeps reading the rest of the data
	after one of those APIs is called. Then receiving a
	malformed frame that causes FRAME_SIZE_ERROR causes
	assertion failure. nghttp2 v1.68.1 adds missing state
	validation to avoid assertion failure. No known
	workarounds are available.
	</p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-27135</cvename>
      <url>https://cveawg.mitre.org/api/cve/CVE-2026-27135</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-03-18</discovery>
      <entry>2026-04-05</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="a117f43b-2f7b-11f1-89f4-b42e991fc52e">
    <topic>MongoDB Server -- CWE-617: Reachable Assertion</topic>
    <affects>
    <package>
	<name>mongodb80</name>
	<range><lt>8.0.18</lt></range>
    </package>
    <package>
	<name>mongodb70</name>
	<range><lt>7.0.31</lt></range>
    </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>https://jira.mongodb.org/browse/SERVER-101758 reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://jira.mongodb.org/browse/SERVER-101758">
	<p>
	A user with access to the cluster with a limited set of
	privilege actions can trigger a crash of amongod process
	during the limited and unpredictable window when the
	cluster is being promoted from a replica set to a sharded
	cluster. This may cause a denial of service by taking
	down the primary of the replica set.
	</p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-5170</cvename>
      <url>https://cveawg.mitre.org/api/cve/CVE-2026-5170</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-03-30</discovery>
      <entry>2026-04-03</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="adb096d4-2e72-11f1-acc1-339a1a6999b0">
    <topic>openexr -- multiple vulnerabilities</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
	<name>openexr</name>
	<range><lt>3.4.9</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>Cary Phillips reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://github.com/AcademySoftwareFoundation/openexr/blob/v3.4.9-rc/CHANGES.md#version-349-april--3-2026">
	  <p>[OpenEXR 3.4.9] addresses the following CVEs:</p>
	  <ul>
	    <li>CVE-2026-34589 DWA Lossy Decoder Heap Out-of-Bounds Write</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-34588 Signed 32-bit Overflow in PIZ Decoder Leads to OOB Read/Write</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-34380 Signed integer overflow (undefined behavior) in undo_pxr24_impl may allow bounds-check bypass in PXR24 decompression</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-34379 Misaligned write in LossyDctDecoder_execute leading to undefined behavior (DWA/DWAB decompression)</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-34378 Signed integer overflow in generic_unpack() when parsing EXR files with crafted negative dataWindow.min.x</li>
	  </ul>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-34589</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-34588</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-34380</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-34379</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-34378</cvename>
      <url>https://github.com/AcademySoftwareFoundation/openexr/blob/v3.4.9-rc/CHANGES.md#version-349-april--3-2026</url>
      <url>https://lists.aswf.io/g/openexr-dev/message/5436</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-03-26</discovery>
      <entry>2026-04-02</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="9fdad262-2e0f-11f1-88c7-00a098b42aeb">
    <topic>Python -- The webbrowser.open() API allows leading dashes</topic>
    <affects>
    <package><name>python310</name> <range><lt>3.10.20_2</lt></range></package>
    <package><name>python311</name> <range><lt>3.11.15_2</lt></range></package>
    <package><name>python312</name> <range><lt>3.12.13_2</lt></range></package>
    <package><name>python313</name> <range><lt>3.13.12_3</lt></range></package>
    <package><name>python313t</name> <range><lt>3.13.12_3</lt></range></package>
    <package><name>python314</name> <range><lt>3.14.4</lt></range></package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/143931 reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/143931">
	  <p>The webbrowser.open() API would accept leading dashes in the URL
	  which could be handled as command line options for certain web
	  browsers. New behavior rejects leading dashes. Users are recommended
	  to sanitize URLs prior to passing to webbrowser.open().</p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-4519</cvename>
      <url>https://cveawg.mitre.org/api/cve/CVE-2026-4519</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-03-20</discovery>
      <entry>2026-04-01</entry>
      <modified>2026-04-04</modified>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="6d3488ae-2e0f-11f1-88c7-00a098b42aeb">
    <topic>Python -- poplib module, when passed a user-controlled command, can have additional commands injected using newlines</topic>
    <affects>
    <package><name>python310</name> <range><ge>0</ge></range></package>
    <package><name>python311</name> <range><ge>0</ge></range></package>
    <package><name>python312</name> <range><ge>0</ge></range></package>
    <package><name>python313</name> <range><ge>0</ge></range></package>
    <package><name>python313t</name> <range><ge>0</ge></range></package>
    <package><name>python314</name> <range><ge>0</ge></range></package>
    <package><name>python314t</name> <range><ge>0</ge></range></package>
    <package><name>python315</name> <range><lt>3.15.0.a6</lt></range></package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>Python Software Foundation Security Developer reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/143924">
	  <p>The poplib module, when passed a user-controlled command, can have
	  additional commands injected using newlines. Mitigation rejects
	  commands containing control characters.</p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2025-15367</cvename>
      <url>https://cveawg.mitre.org/api/cve/CVE-2025-15367</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-01-20</discovery>
      <entry>2026-04-01</entry>
      <modified>2026-08-14</modified>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="0be929a5-2e0f-11f1-88c7-00a098b42aeb">
    <topic>Python -- imaplib module, when passed a user-controlled command, can have additional commands injected using newlines</topic>
    <affects>
    <package><name>python310</name> <range><ge>0</ge></range></package>
    <package><name>python311</name> <range><ge>0</ge></range></package>
    <package><name>python312</name> <range><ge>0</ge></range></package>
    <package><name>python313</name> <range><lt>3.13.15</lt></range></package>
    <package><name>python313t</name> <range><lt>3.13.15</lt></range></package>
    <package><name>python314</name> <range><lt>3.14.7</lt></range></package>
    <package><name>python314t</name> <range><lt>3.14.7</lt></range></package>
    <package><name>python315</name> <range><lt>3.15.0.b4</lt></range></package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>Python Software Foundation Security Developer reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://github.com/python/cpython/issues/143921">
	  <p>The imaplib module, when passed a user-controlled command, can have
	  additional commands injected using newlines.  Mitigation rejects
	  commands containing specific control characters.</p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2025-15366</cvename>
      <url>https://cveawg.mitre.org/api/cve/CVE-2025-15366</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-01-20</discovery>
      <entry>2026-04-01</entry>
      <modified>2026-08-08</modified>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="1dc2aae1-0793-4dbd-8548-e63ae0e1bdaf">
    <topic>chromium -- security fixes</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
       <name>chromium</name>
       <range><lt>146.0.7680.177</lt></range>
      </package>
      <package>
       <name>ungoogled-chromium</name>
       <range><lt>146.0.7680.177</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
       <p>Chrome Releases reports:</p>
       <blockquote cite="https://chromereleases.googleblog.com/2026/03/stable-channel-update-for-desktop_31.html">
	 <p>This update includes 21 security fixes:</p>
	 <ul>
	    <li>[493952652] High CVE-2026-5273: Use after free in CSS. Reported by Anonymous on 2026-03-18</li>
	    <li>[491732188] High CVE-2026-5272: Heap buffer overflow in GPU. Reported by inspector-ambitious on 2026-03-11</li>
	    <li>[488596746] High CVE-2026-5274: Integer overflow in Codecs. Reported by heapracer (@heapracer) on 2026-03-01</li>
	    <li>[489494022] High CVE-2026-5275: Heap buffer overflow in ANGLE. Reported by c6eed09fc8b174b0f3eebedcceb1e792 on 2026-03-04</li>
	    <li>[489711638] High CVE-2026-5276: Insufficient policy enforcement in WebUSB. Reported by Ariel Simon on 2026-03-04</li>
	    <li>[489791424] High CVE-2026-5277: Integer overflow in ANGLE. Reported by c6eed09fc8b174b0f3eebedcceb1e792 on 2026-03-05</li>
	    <li>[490254128] High CVE-2026-5278: Use after free in Web MIDI. Reported by c6eed09fc8b174b0f3eebedcceb1e792 on 2026-03-06</li>
	    <li>[490642836] High CVE-2026-5279: Object corruption in V8. Reported by Hyeonjun Ahn (@_deayzl) on 2026-03-08</li>
	    <li>[491515787] High CVE-2026-5280: Use after free in WebCodecs. Reported by heapracer (@heapracer) on 2026-03-11</li>
	    <li>[491518608] High CVE-2026-5281: Use after free in Dawn. Reported by 86ac1f1587b71893ed2ad792cd7dde32 on 2026-03-10</li>
	    <li>[491655161] High CVE-2026-5282: Out of bounds read in WebCodecs. Reported by c6eed09fc8b174b0f3eebedcceb1e792 on 2026-03-11</li>
	    <li>[492131521] High CVE-2026-5283: Inappropriate implementation in ANGLE. Reported by sweetchip on 2026-03-12</li>
	    <li>[492139412] High CVE-2026-5284: Use after free in Dawn. Reported by 86ac1f1587b71893ed2ad792cd7dde32 on 2026-03-12</li>
	    <li>[492228019] High CVE-2026-5285: Use after free in WebGL. Reported by c6eed09fc8b174b0f3eebedcceb1e792 on 2026-03-13</li>
	    <li>[493900619] High CVE-2026-5286: Use after free in Dawn. Reported by sweetchip on 2026-03-18</li>
	    <li>[494644471] High CVE-2026-5287: Use after free in PDF. Reported by Syn4pse on 2026-03-21</li>
	    <li>[495507390] High CVE-2026-5288: Use after free in WebView. Reported by Google on 2026-03-23</li>
	    <li>[495931147] High CVE-2026-5289: Use after free in Navigation. Reported by Google on 2026-03-25</li>
	    <li>[496205576] High CVE-2026-5290: Use after free in Compositing. Reported by Google on 2026-03-25</li>
	    <li>[490118036] Medium CVE-2026-5291: Inappropriate implementation in WebGL. Reported by heapracer (@heapracer) on 2026-03-06</li>
	    <li>[492213293] Medium CVE-2026-5292: Out of bounds read in WebCodecs. Reported by Google on 2026-03-12</li>
	 </ul>
       </blockquote>
      </body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-5273</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-5272</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-5274</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-5275</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-5276</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-5277</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-5278</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-5279</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-5280</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-5281</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-5282</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-5283</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-5284</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-5285</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-5286</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-5287</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-5288</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-5289</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-5290</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-5291</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-5292</cvename>
      <url>https://chromereleases.googleblog.com/2026/03/stable-channel-update-for-desktop_31.html</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-03-31</discovery>
      <entry>2026-04-01</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="09e36f7e-2b5b-11f1-852e-5404a68ad561">
    <topic>traefik -- Multiple vulnerabilities</topic>
    <affects>
<package>
<name>traefik</name>
<range><lt>3.6.12</lt></range>
</package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>The traefik project releases a new version addressing multiple CVEs:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://github.com/traefik/traefik/releases/tag/v3.6.12">
	  <ul>
	    <li>CVE-2026-33433 (BasicAuth/DigestAuth Identity Spoofing via Non-Canonical headerField)</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-33186 (authorization bypass via missing leading slash in :path)</li>
	  </ul>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-33433</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-33186</cvename>
      <url>https://github.com/traefik/traefik/releases/tag/v3.6.12</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-03-26</discovery>
      <entry>2026-03-29</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="095e9db2-2b5b-11f1-9839-8447094a420f">
    <topic>Roundcube -- SVG Attribute Bypass</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
	<name>roundcube-php82</name>
	<name>roundcube-php83</name>
	<name>roundcube-php84</name>
	<name>roundcube-php85</name>
	<range><lt>1.6.15,1</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>The Roundcube project reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://github.com/roundcube/roundcubemail/releases/tag/1.6.15">
	  <p>.</p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <url>https://github.com/roundcube/roundcubemail/releases/tag/1.6.15</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-03-29</discovery>
      <entry>2026-03-29</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="b933083e-2b2e-11f1-b60a-2cf05da270f3">
    <topic>Gitlab -- vulnerabilities</topic>
    <affects>
<package>
<name>gitlab-ce</name>
<name>gitlab-ee</name>
<range><ge>18.10.0</ge><lt>18.10.1</lt></range>
<range><ge>18.9.0</ge><lt>18.9.3</lt></range>
<range><ge>7.11.0</ge><lt>18.8.7</lt></range>
</package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>Gitlab reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://about.gitlab.com/releases/2026/03/25/patch-release-gitlab-18-10-1-released/">
	  <p>Improper Handling of Parameters issue in Jira Connect installations impacts GitLab CE/EE</p>
	  <p>Cross-Site Request Forgery issue in GLQL API impacts GitLab CE/EE</p>
	  <p>HTML Injection in vulnerability report impacts GitLab EE</p>
	  <p>Denial of Service issue in GraphQL API impacts GitLab CE/EE</p>
	  <p>Improper Access Control issue in WebAuthn 2FA impacts GitLab CE/EE</p>
	  <p>Improper Access Control issue in GraphQL query impacts GitLab EE</p>
	  <p>Denial of Service issue in CI configuration processing impacts GitLab CE/EE</p>
	  <p>Denial of Service issue in webhook configuration impacts GitLab CE/EE</p>
	  <p>Cross-site Scripting issue in Mermaid diagram renderer impacts GitLab CE/EE</p>
	  <p>Improper Access Control issue in Merge Requests impacts GitLab CE/EE</p>
	  <p>Access Control issue in GraphQL API impacts GitLab EE</p>
	  <p>Incorrect Authorization issue in authorization caching impacts GitLab EE</p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-2370</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-3857</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-2995</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-3988</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-2745</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-1724</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2025-13436</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2025-13078</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-2973</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-2726</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2025-14595</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-4363</cvename>
      <url>https://about.gitlab.com/releases/2026/03/25/patch-release-gitlab-18-10-1-released/</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-03-25</discovery>
      <entry>2026-03-29</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="970fd0ec-26f5-11f1-a9b1-0cc47ada5f32">
    <topic>jenkins -- multiple vulnerabilities</topic>
    <affects>
    <package>
	<name>jenkins</name>
	<range><lt>2.555</lt></range>
    </package>
    <package>
	<name>jenkins-lts</name>
	<range><lt>2.541.3</lt></range>
    </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>Jenkins Security Advisory 2026-03-18:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://www.jenkins.io/security/advisory/2026-03-18/">
	  <ul>
	    <li>SECURITY-3657 / CVE-2026-33001: Arbitrary file write
	    vulnerability through specially crafted archives in Jenkins
	    (High)</li>
	    <li>SECURITY-3674 / CVE-2026-33002: DNS rebinding vulnerability
	    in WebSocket CLI origin validation in Jenkins (High)</li>
	  </ul>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-33001</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-33002</cvename>
      <url>https://www.jenkins.io/security/advisory/2026-03-18/</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-03-18</discovery>
      <entry>2026-03-27</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="26c24872-2943-11f1-8461-b42e991fc52e">
    <topic>Mozilla -- Multiple vulnerabilities</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
	<name>firefox</name>
	<range><lt>149.0.0,2</lt></range>
      </package>
      <package>
	<name>thunderbird</name>
	<range><lt>149.0.0</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>CVE-2026-4729: Memory safety bugs</p>
	<p>CVE-2026-4728: Spoofing issue in the Privacy: Anti-Tracking
	component.</p>
	<p>CVE-2026-4727: Denial-of-service in the Libraries component
	in NSS.</p>
	<p>CVE-2026-4726: Denial-of-service in the XML component.</p>
	<p>CVE-2026-4725: Sandbox escape due to use-after-free in the
	Graphics: Canvas2D component.</p>
	<p>CVE-2026-4724: Undefined behavior in the Audio/Video
	component.</p>
	<p>CVE-2026-4723: Use-after-free in the JavaScript Engine
	component.</p>
	<p>CVE-2026-4722: Privilege escalation in the IPC component.</p>
      </body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-4729</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-4728</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-4727</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-4726</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-4725</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-4724</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-4723</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-4722</cvename>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-03-24</discovery>
      <entry>2026-03-26</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="32819a60-2943-11f1-8461-b42e991fc52e">
    <topic>Mozilla -- Multiple vulnerabilities</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
	<name>firefox</name>
	<range><lt>149.0.0,2</lt></range>
      </package>
      <package>
	<name>firefox-esr</name>
	<range><lt>140.9.0,2</lt></range>
      </package>
      <package>
	<name>thunderbird</name>
	<range><lt>149.0.0</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>CVE-2026-4721: Memory safety bugs. Potential arbitrary code
	execution.</p>
	<p>CVE-2026-4709: Incorrect boundary conditions in the
	Audio/Video: GMP component.</p>
	<p>CVE-2026-4707: Incorrect boundary conditions in the Graphics:
	Canvas2D component.</p>
	<p>CVE-2026-4706: Incorrect boundary conditions in the Graphics:
	Canvas2D component.</p>
	<p>CVE-2026-4699: Incorrect boundary conditions in the Layout:
	Text and Fonts component.</p>
	<p>CVE-2026-4698: JIT miscompilation in the JavaScript Engine:
	JIT component.</p>
	<p>CVE-2026-4696: Use-after-free in the Layout: Text and Fonts
	component.</p>
	<p>CVE-2026-4694: Incorrect boundary conditions, integer
	overflow in the Graphics component.</p>
	<p>CVE-2026-4693: Incorrect boundary conditions in the
	Audio/Video: Playback component.</p>
	<p>CVE-2026-4692: Sandbox escape in the Responsive Design Mode
	component.</p>
	<p>CVE-2026-4691: Use-after-free in the CSS Parsing and
	Computation component.</p>
	<p>CVE-2026-4690: Sandbox escape due to integer overflow in the
	XPCOM component.</p>
	<p>CVE-2026-4689: Sandbox escape due to integer overflow in the
	XPCOM component.</p>
	<p>CVE-2026-4687: Sandbox escape in the Telemetry component.</p>
	<p>CVE-2026-4686: Incorrect boundary conditions in the Graphics:
	Canvas2D component.</p>
	<p>CVE-2026-4685: Incorrect boundary conditions in the Graphics:
	Canvas2D component.</p>
	<p>CVE-2026-4684: Race condition, use-after-free in the
	Graphics: WebRender component.</p>
      </body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-4721</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-4709</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-4707</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-4706</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-4699</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-4698</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-4696</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-4694</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-4693</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-4692</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-4691</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-4690</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-4689</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-4687</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-4686</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-4685</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-4684</cvename>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-03-24</discovery>
      <entry>2026-03-26</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="6d445322-2945-11f1-8461-b42e991fc52e">
    <topic>Mozilla -- Multiple vulnerabilities</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
	<name>firefox</name>
	<range><lt>149.0.0,2</lt></range>
      </package>
      <package>
	<name>thunderbird</name>
	<range><lt>149.0.0</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>CVE-2026-4688: Sandbox escape due to use-after-free in
	Disability Access APIs.</p>
	<p>CVE-2026-4695: Incorrect boundary conditions in the
	Audio/Video: Web Codecs component.</p>
	<p>CVE-2026-4697: Incorrect boundary conditions in the
	Audio/Video: Web Codecs component.</p>
	<p>CVE-2026-4700: Mitigation bypass in the Networking: HTTP
	component.</p>
	<p>CVE-2026-4701: Use-after-free in the JavaScript Engine
	component.</p>
	<p>CVE-2026-4702: JIT miscompilation in the JavaScript Engine
	component.</p>
	<p>CVE-2026-4704: Denial-of-service in the WebRTC: Signaling
	component.</p>
	<p>CVE-2026-4705: Undefined behavior in the WebRTC: Signaling
	component.</p>
	<p>CVE-2026-4708: Incorrect boundary conditions in the Graphics
	component.</p>
	<p>CVE-2026-4710: Incorrect boundary conditions in the
	Audio/Video component.</p>
	<p>CVE-2026-4711: Use-after-free in the Widget: Cocoa
	component.</p>
	<p>CVE-2026-4712: Information disclosure in the Widget: Cocoa
	component.</p>
	<p>CVE-2026-4713: Incorrect boundary conditions in the Graphics
	component.</p>
	<p>CVE-2026-4714: Incorrect boundary conditions in the
	Audio/Video component.</p>
	<p>CVE-2026-4715: Uninitialized memory in the Graphics: Canvas2D
	component.</p>
	<p>CVE-2026-4716: Incorrect boundary conditions and
	uninitialized memory in the JavaScript Engine.</p>
	<p>CVE-2026-4717: Privilege escalation in the Netmonitor
	component.</p>
	<p>CVE-2026-4718: Undefined behavior in the WebRTC: Signaling
	component.</p>
	<p>CVE-2026-4719: Incorrect boundary conditions in the Graphics:
	Text component.</p>
	<p>CVE-2026-4720: Memory safety bugs</p>
      </body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-4688</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-4695</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-4697</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-4700</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-4701</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-4702</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-4704</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-4705</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-4708</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-4710</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-4711</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-4712</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-4713</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-4714</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-4715</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-4716</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-4717</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-4718</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-4719</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-4720</cvename>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-03-24</discovery>
      <entry>2026-03-26</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="733febba-28d2-11f1-b35e-bc241121aa0a">
    <topic>FreeBSD -- Remote code execution via RPCSEC_GSS packet validation</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
	<name>FreeBSD-kernel</name>
	<range><ge>15.0</ge><lt>15.0_5</lt></range>
	<range><ge>14.4</ge><lt>14.4_1</lt></range>
	<range><ge>14.3</ge><lt>14.3_10</lt></range>
	<range><ge>13.5</ge><lt>13.5_11</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<h1>Problem Description:</h1>
	  <p>Each RPCSEC_GSS data packet is validated by a routine which
	  checks a signature in the packet.  This routine copies a portion
	  of the packet into a stack buffer, but fails to ensure that the
	  buffer is sufficiently large, and a malicious client can trigger a
	  stack overflow.  Notably, this does not require the client to
	  authenticate itself first.</p>
	<h1>Impact:</h1>
	  <p>As kgssapi.ko's RPCSEC_GSS implementation is vulnerable, remote
	  code execution in the kernel is possible by an authenticated user
	  that is able to send packets to the kernel's NFS server while
	  kgssapi.ko is loaded into the kernel.</p>
	  <p>In userspace, applications which have librpcgss_sec loaded and run
	  an RPC server are vulnerable to remote code execution from any
	  client able to send it packets.  We are not aware of any such
	  applications in the FreeBSD base system.</p>
      </body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-4747</cvename>
      <freebsdsa>SA-26:08.rpcsec_gss</freebsdsa>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-03-25</discovery>
      <entry>2026-03-26</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="11bf64f0-28d2-11f1-b35e-bc241121aa0a">
    <topic>FreeBSD -- Remote denial of service via null pointer dereference</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
	<name>FreeBSD-kernel</name>
	<range><ge>15.0</ge><lt>15.0_5</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<h1>Problem Description:</h1>
	  <p>On a system exposing an NVMe/TCP target, a remote client can
	  trigger a kernel panic by sending a CONNECT command for an I/O queue
	  with a bogus or stale CNTLID.</p>
	<h1>Impact:</h1>
	  <p>An attacker with network access to the NVMe/TCP target can
	  trigger an unauthenticated Denial of Service condition on the
	  affected machine.</p>
      </body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-4652</cvename>
      <freebsdsa>SA-26:07.nvmf</freebsdsa>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-03-25</discovery>
      <entry>2026-03-26</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="7aa913e9-28d1-11f1-b35e-bc241121aa0a">
    <topic>FreeBSD -- TCP: remotely exploitable DoS vector (mbuf leak)</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
	<name>FreeBSD-kernel</name>
	<range><ge>15.0</ge><lt>15.0_5</lt></range>
	<range><ge>14.4</ge><lt>14.4_1</lt></range>
	<range><ge>14.3</ge><lt>14.3_10</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<h1>Problem Description:</h1>
	  <p>When a challenge ACK is to be sent tcp_respond() constructs and
	  sends the challenge ACK and consumes the mbuf that is passed in.
	  When no challenge ACK should be sent the function returns and leaks
	  the mbuf.</p>
	<h1>Impact:</h1>
	  <p>If an attacker is either on path with an established TCP
	  connection, or can themselves establish a TCP connection, to an
	  affected FreeBSD machine, they can easily craft and send packets
	  which meet the challenge ACK criteria and cause the FreeBSD host
	  to leak an mbuf for each crafted packet in excess of the configured
	  rate limit settings i.e.  with default settings, crafted packets
	  in excess of the first 5 sent within a 1s period will leak an mbuf.</p>
	  <p>Technically, off-path attackers can also exploit this problem by
	  guessing the IP addresses, TCP port numbers and in some cases the
	  sequence numbers of established connections and spoofing packets
	  towards a FreeBSD machine, but this is harder to do effectively.</p>
      </body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-4247</cvename>
      <freebsdsa>SA-26:06.tcp</freebsdsa>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-03-25</discovery>
      <entry>2026-03-26</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="07d6b170-fed8-4ee2-ba96-b6d61b6d6a26">
    <topic>chromium -- security fixes</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
       <name>chromium</name>
       <range><lt>146.0.7680.164</lt></range>
      </package>
      <package>
       <name>ungoogled-chromium</name>
       <range><lt>146.0.7680.164</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
       <p>Chrome Releases reports:</p>
       <blockquote cite="https://chromereleases.googleblog.com/2026/03/stable-channel-update-for-desktop_23.html">
	 <p>This update includes 8 security fixes:</p>
	 <ul>
	    <li>[485397284] High CVE-2026-4673: Heap buffer overflow in WebAudio. Reported by c6eed09fc8b174b0f3eebedcceb1e792 on 2026-02-18</li>
	    <li>[488188166] High CVE-2026-4674: Out of bounds read in CSS. Reported by Syn4pse on 2026-02-27</li>
	    <li>[488270257] High CVE-2026-4675: Heap buffer overflow in WebGL. Reported by 86ac1f1587b71893ed2ad792cd7dde32 on 2026-02-27</li>
	    <li>[488613135] High CVE-2026-4676: Use after free in Dawn. Reported by 86ac1f1587b71893ed2ad792cd7dde32 on 2026-03-01</li>
	    <li>[490533968] High CVE-2026-4677: Out of bounds read in WebAudio. Reported by c6eed09fc8b174b0f3eebedcceb1e792 on 2026-03-07</li>
	    <li>[491164019] High CVE-2026-4678: Use after free in WebGPU. Reported by Google on 2026-03-10</li>
	    <li>[491516670] High CVE-2026-4679: Integer overflow in Fonts. Reported by GF, Un3xploitable Of DeadSec on 2026-03-11</li>
	    <li>[491869946] High CVE-2026-4680: Use after free in FedCM. Reported by Shaheen Fazim on 2026-03-12</li>
	 </ul>
       </blockquote>
      </body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-4673</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-4674</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-4675</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-4676</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-4677</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-4678</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-4679</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-4680</cvename>
      <url>https://chromereleases.googleblog.com/2026/03/stable-channel-update-for-desktop_23.html</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-03-23</discovery>
      <entry>2026-03-24</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="3c370171-b6b6-463a-8746-ee49bea08c87">
    <topic>chromium -- security fixes</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
       <name>chromium</name>
       <range><lt>146.0.7680.153</lt></range>
      </package>
      <package>
       <name>ungoogled-chromium</name>
       <range><lt>146.0.7680.153</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
       <p>Chrome Releases reports:</p>
       <blockquote cite="https://chromereleases.googleblog.com/2026/03/stable-channel-update-for-desktop_18.html">
	 <p>This update includes 26 security fixes:</p>
	 <ul>
	    <li>[475877320] Critical CVE-2026-4439: Out of bounds memory access in WebGL. Reported by Goodluck on 2026-01-15</li>
	    <li>[485935305] Critical CVE-2026-4440: Out of bounds read and write in WebGL. Reported by c6eed09fc8b174b0f3eebedcceb1e792 on 2026-02-20</li>
	    <li>[489381399] Critical CVE-2026-4441: Use after free in Base. Reported by Google on 2026-03-03</li>
	    <li>[484751092] High CVE-2026-4442: Heap buffer overflow in CSS. Reported by Syn4pse on 2026-02-16</li>
	    <li>[485292589] High CVE-2026-4443: Heap buffer overflow in WebAudio. Reported by c6eed09fc8b174b0f3eebedcceb1e792 on 2026-02-18</li>
	    <li>[486349161] High CVE-2026-4444: Stack buffer overflow in WebRTC. Reported by c6eed09fc8b174b0f3eebedcceb1e792 on 2026-02-21</li>
	    <li>[486421953] High CVE-2026-4445: Use after free in WebRTC. Reported by c6eed09fc8b174b0f3eebedcceb1e792 on 2026-02-22</li>
	    <li>[486421954] High CVE-2026-4446: Use after free in WebRTC. Reported by c6eed09fc8b174b0f3eebedcceb1e792 on 2026-02-22</li>
	    <li>[486657483] High CVE-2026-4447: Inappropriate implementation in V8. Reported by Erge on 2026-02-23</li>
	    <li>[486972661] High CVE-2026-4448: Heap buffer overflow in ANGLE. Reported by M. Fauzan Wijaya (Gh05t666nero) on 2026-02-23</li>
	    <li>[487117772] High CVE-2026-4449: Use after free in Blink. Reported by Syn4pse on 2026-02-24</li>
	    <li>[487746373] High CVE-2026-4450: Out of bounds write in V8. Reported by qymag1c on 2026-02-26</li>
	    <li>[487768779] High CVE-2026-4451: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Navigation. Reported by c6eed09fc8b174b0f3eebedcceb1e792 on 2026-02-26</li>
	    <li>[487977696] High CVE-2026-4452: Integer overflow in ANGLE. Reported by cinzinga on 2026-02-26</li>
	    <li>[488400770] High CVE-2026-4453: Integer overflow in Dawn. Reported by sweetchip on 2026-02-27</li>
	    <li>[488585488] High CVE-2026-4454: Use after free in Network. Reported by heapracer (@heapracer) on 2026-03-01</li>
	    <li>[488585504] High CVE-2026-4455: Heap buffer overflow in PDFium. Reported by c6eed09fc8b174b0f3eebedcceb1e792 on 2026-03-01</li>
	    <li>[488617440] High CVE-2026-4456: Use after free in Digital Credentials API. Reported by sean wong on 2026-02-28</li>
	    <li>[488803413] High CVE-2026-4457: Type Confusion in V8. Reported by Zhenpeng (Leo) Lin at depthfirst on 2026-03-01</li>
	    <li>[489619753] High CVE-2026-4458: Use after free in Extensions. Reported by Shaheen Fazim on 2026-03-04</li>
	    <li>[490246422] High CVE-2026-4459: Out of bounds read and write in WebAudio. Reported by Jihyeon Jeong (Compsec Lab, Seoul National University / Research Intern) on 2026-03-06</li>
	    <li>[490254124] High CVE-2026-4460: Out of bounds read in Skia. Reported by c6eed09fc8b174b0f3eebedcceb1e792 on 2026-03-06</li>
	    <li>[490558172] High CVE-2026-4461: Inappropriate implementation in V8. Reported by Google on 2026-03-07</li>
	    <li>[491080830] High CVE-2026-4462: Out of bounds read in Blink. Reported by heapracer (@heapracer) on 2026-03-09</li>
	    <li>[491358681] High CVE-2026-4463: Heap buffer overflow in WebRTC. Reported by c6eed09fc8b174b0f3eebedcceb1e792 on 2026-03-10</li>
	    <li>[487208468] Medium CVE-2026-4464: Integer overflow in ANGLE. Reported by heesun on 2026-02-24</li>
	 </ul>
       </blockquote>
      </body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-4439</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-4440</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-4441</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-4442</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-4443</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-4444</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-4445</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-4446</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-4447</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-4448</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-4449</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-4450</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-4451</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-4452</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-4453</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-4454</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-4455</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-4456</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-4457</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-4458</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-4459</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-4460</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-4461</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-4462</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-4463</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-4464</cvename>
      <url>https://chromereleases.googleblog.com/2026/03/stable-channel-update-for-desktop_18.html</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-03-18</discovery>
      <entry>2026-03-24</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="832a823b-25b5-11f1-b6f8-5404a68ad561">
    <topic>traefik -- Multiple vulnerabilities</topic>
    <affects>
    <package>
	<name>traefik</name>
	<range><lt>3.6.11</lt></range>
    </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>The traefik project releases a new version addressing multiple CVEs:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://github.com/traefik/traefik/releases/tag/v3.6.11">
	  <ul>
	    <li>CVE-2026-32595 (BasicAuth Middleware Timing Attack)</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-32305 (Potential mTLS Bypass via Fragmented TLS ClientHello)</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-32695 (Details not yet available)</li>
	  </ul>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-32595</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-32305</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-32695</cvename>
      <url>https://github.com/traefik/traefik/releases/tag/v3.6.11</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-03-19</discovery>
      <entry>2026-03-22</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="71b4ce56-23c5-11f1-b865-b42e991fc52e">
    <topic>UniFi Network Application - Multiple vulnerabilities</topic>
    <affects>
    <package>
	<name>unifi10</name>
	<range><lt>10.1.89</lt></range>
    </package>
    <package>
	<name>unifi9</name>
	<range><lt>9.0.114</lt></range>
    </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>https://community.ui.com/releases/Security-Advisory-Bulletin-062-062/c29719c0-405e-4d4a-8f26-e343e99f931b reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://community.ui.com/releases/Security-Advisory-Bulletin-062-062/c29719c0-405e-4d4a-8f26-e343e99f931b">
	  <p>An Authenticated NoSQL Injection vulnerability found in
	  UniFi Network Application could allow a malicious actor with
	  authenticated access to the network to escalate
	  privileges.</p>
	  <p>A malicious actor with access to the network could
	  exploit a Path Traversal vulnerability found in the UniFi
	  Network Application to access files on the underlying system
	  that could be manipulated to access an underlying
	  account.</p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-22558</cvename>
      <url>https://cveawg.mitre.org/api/cve/CVE-2026-22558</url>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-22557</cvename>
      <url>https://cveawg.mitre.org/api/cve/CVE-2026-22557</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-03-19</discovery>
      <entry>2026-03-19</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="c5b93cb5-2363-11f1-81da-8447094a420f">
    <topic>Roundcube -- Multiple vulnerabilities</topic>
    <affects>
	<package>
	<name>roundcube-php82</name>
	<name>roundcube-php83</name>
	<name>roundcube-php84</name>
	<name>roundcube-php85</name>
	<range><lt>1.6.14,1</lt></range>
	</package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>The Roundcube project reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://github.com/roundcube/roundcubemail/releases/tag/1.6.14">
	  <p>pre-auth arbitrary file write via unsafe deserialization in redis/memcache session handler</p>
	  <p>password could get changed without providing the old password</p>
	  <p>IMAP Injection + CSRF bypass in mail search</p>
	  <p>remote image blocking bypass via various SVG animate attributes</p>
	  <p>remote image blocking bypass via a crafted body background attribute</p>
	  <p>fixed position mitigation bypass via use of !important</p>
	  <p>XSS issue in a HTML attachment preview</p>
	  <p>SSRF + Information Disclosure via stylesheet links to a local network hosts</p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <url>https://github.com/roundcube/roundcubemail/releases/tag/1.6.14</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-03-18</discovery>
      <entry>2026-03-19</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="db3bdcc6-377f-47d9-9ce8-4bdede4fdafe">
    <topic>homebox -- multiple vulnerabilities</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
	<name>homebox</name>
	<range><lt>0.24.0</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>Homebox reports:</p>
	<ul>
	  <li>[HIGH] CVE-2026-27981: Auth Rate Limit Bypass via IP Spoofing</li>
	  <li>[MODERATE] CVE-2026-27600: Blind SSRF</li>
	  <li>[MODERATE] CVE-2026-26272: Stored XSS via HTML/SVG Attachment Upload</li>
	</ul>
      </body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-27981</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-27600</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-26272</cvename>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-03-01</discovery>
      <entry>2026-03-17</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="73eeb578-fd13-4d79-b50b-ed25c3614528">
    <topic>chromium -- security fix</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
       <name>chromium</name>
       <range><lt>146.0.7680.80</lt></range>
      </package>
      <package>
       <name>ungoogled-chromium</name>
       <range><lt>146.0.7680.80</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
       <p>Chrome Releases reports:</p>
       <blockquote cite="https://chromereleases.googleblog.com/2026/03/stable-channel-update-for-desktop_13.html">
	 <p>This update includes 1 security fix:</p>
	 <ul>
	    <li>[491421267] High CVE-2026-3909: Out of bounds write in Skia. Reported by Google Threat Analysis Group on 2026-03-10</li>
	 </ul>
       </blockquote>
      </body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-3909</cvename>
      <url>https://chromereleases.googleblog.com/2026/03/stable-channel-update-for-desktop_13.html</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-03-13</discovery>
      <entry>2026-03-15</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="26776062-fd24-4c2f-bf6c-7f231948ab19">
    <topic>chromium -- security fixes</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
       <name>chromium</name>
       <range><lt>146.0.7680.75</lt></range>
      </package>
      <package>
       <name>ungoogled-chromium</name>
       <range><lt>146.0.7680.75</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
       <p>Chrome Releases reports:</p>
       <blockquote cite="https://chromereleases.googleblog.com/2026/03/stable-channel-update-for-desktop_12.html">
	 <p>This update includes 2 security fixes:</p>
	 <ul>
	    <li>[491421267] High CVE-2026-3909: Out of bounds write in Skia. Reported by Google on 2026-03-10</li>
	    <li>[491410818] High CVE-2026-3910: Inappropriate implementation in V8. Reported by Google on 2026-03-10</li>
	 </ul>
       </blockquote>
      </body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-3909</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-3910</cvename>
      <url>https://chromereleases.googleblog.com/2026/03/stable-channel-update-for-desktop_12.html</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-03-12</discovery>
      <entry>2026-03-15</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="e45fb606-b731-4871-881d-27a1d5e2fd03">
    <topic>chromium -- security fixes</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
       <name>chromium</name>
       <range><lt>146.0.7680.71</lt></range>
      </package>
      <package>
       <name>ungoogled-chromium</name>
       <range><lt>146.0.7680.71</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
       <p>Chrome Releases reports:</p>
       <blockquote cite="https://chromereleases.googleblog.com/2026/03/stable-channel-update-for-desktop_10.html">
	 <p>This update includes 29 security fixes:</p>
	 <ul>
	    <li>[483445078] Critical CVE-2026-3913: Heap buffer overflow in WebML. Reported by Tobias Wienand on 2026-02-10</li>
	    <li>[481776048] High CVE-2026-3914: Integer overflow in WebML. Reported by cinzinga on 2026-02-04</li>
	    <li>[483971526] High CVE-2026-3915: Heap buffer overflow in WebML. Reported by Tobias Wienand on 2026-02-12</li>
	    <li>[482828615] High CVE-2026-3916: Out of bounds read in Web Speech. Reported by Grischa Hauser on 2026-02-09</li>
	    <li>[483569512] High CVE-2026-3917: Use after free in Agents. Reported by Syn4pse on 2026-02-11</li>
	    <li>[483853103] High CVE-2026-3918: Use after free in WebMCP. Reported by Syn4pse on 2026-02-12</li>
	    <li>[444176961] High CVE-2026-3919: Use after free in Extensions. Reported by Huinian Yang (@vmth6) of Amber Security Lab, OPPO Mobile Telecommunications Corp. Ltd. on 2025-09-10</li>
	    <li>[482875307] High CVE-2026-3920: Out of bounds memory access in WebML. Reported by Google on 2026-02-09</li>
	    <li>[484946544] High CVE-2026-3921: Use after free in TextEncoding. Reported by Pranamya Keshkamat &amp; Cantina.xyz on 2026-02-17</li>
	    <li>[485397139] High CVE-2026-3922: Use after free in MediaStream. Reported by c6eed09fc8b174b0f3eebedcceb1e792 on 2026-02-18</li>
	    <li>[485935314] High CVE-2026-3923: Use after free in WebMIDI. Reported by c6eed09fc8b174b0f3eebedcceb1e792 on 2026-02-20</li>
	    <li>[487338366] High CVE-2026-3924: Use after free in WindowDialog. Reported by c6eed09fc8b174b0f3eebedcceb1e792 on 2026-02-25</li>
	    <li>[418214610] Medium CVE-2026-3925: Incorrect security UI in LookalikeChecks. Reported by NDevTK and Alesandro Ortiz on 2025-05-17</li>
	    <li>[478659010] Medium CVE-2026-3926: Out of bounds read in V8. Reported by qymag1c on 2026-01-26</li>
	    <li>[474948986] Medium CVE-2026-3927: Incorrect security UI in PictureInPicture. Reported by Barath Stalin K on 2026-01-11</li>
	    <li>[435980394] Medium CVE-2026-3928: Insufficient policy enforcement in Extensions. Reported by portsniffer443 on 2025-08-03</li>
	    <li>[477180001] Medium CVE-2026-3929: Side-channel information leakage in ResourceTiming. Reported by Povcfe of Tencent Security Xuanwu Lab on 2026-01-20</li>
	    <li>[476898368] Medium CVE-2026-3930: Unsafe navigation in Navigation. Reported by Povcfe of Tencent Security Xuanwu Lab on 2026-01-19</li>
	    <li>[417599694] Medium CVE-2026-3931: Heap buffer overflow in Skia. Reported by Huinian Yang (@vmth6) of Amber Security Lab, OPPO Mobile Telecommunications Corp. Ltd. on 2025-05-14</li>
	    <li>[478296121] Medium CVE-2026-3932: Insufficient policy enforcement in PDF. Reported by Ayato Shitomi on 2026-01-23   </li>
	    <li>[478783560] Medium CVE-2026-3934: Insufficient policy enforcement in ChromeDriver. Reported by Povcfe of Tencent Security Xuanwu Lab on 2026-01-26</li>
	    <li>[479326680] Medium CVE-2026-3935: Incorrect security UI in WebAppInstalls. Reported by Barath Stalin K on 2026-01-28</li>
	    <li>[481920229] Medium CVE-2026-3936: Use after free in WebView. Reported by Am4deu$ on 2026-02-05</li>
	    <li>[473118648] Low CVE-2026-3937: Incorrect security UI in Downloads. Reported by Abhishek Kumar on 2026-01-03</li>
	    <li>[474763968] Low CVE-2026-3938: Insufficient policy enforcement in Clipboard. Reported by vicevirus on 2026-01-10</li>
	    <li>[40058077] Low CVE-2026-3939: Insufficient policy enforcement in PDF. Reported by NDevTK on 2021-11-30</li>
	    <li>[470574526] Low CVE-2026-3940: Insufficient policy enforcement in DevTools. Reported by Jorian Woltjer, Mian, bug_blitzer on 2025-12-21</li>
	    <li>[474670215] Low CVE-2026-3941: Insufficient policy enforcement in DevTools. Reported by Lyra Rebane (rebane2001) on 2026-01-10</li>
	    <li>[475238879] Low CVE-2026-3942: Incorrect security UI in PictureInPicture. Reported by Barath Stalin K on 2026-01-12</li>
	 </ul>
       </blockquote>
      </body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-3913</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-3914</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-3915</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-3916</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-3917</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-3918</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-3919</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-3920</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-3921</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-3922</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-3923</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-3924</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-3925</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-3926</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-3927</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-3928</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-3929</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-3930</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-3931</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-3932</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-3934</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-3935</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-3936</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-3937</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-3938</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-3939</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-3940</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-3941</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-3942</cvename>
      <url>https://chromereleases.googleblog.com/2026/03/stable-channel-update-for-desktop_10.html</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-03-10</discovery>
      <entry>2026-03-15</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="ee1e6a24-1eeb-11f1-81da-8447094a420f">
    <topic>OpenSSL -- key agreement vulnerability</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
	<name>openssl35</name>
	<range><lt>3.5.5_1</lt></range>
      </package>
      <package>
	<name>openssl36</name>
	<range><lt>3.6.1_1</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>The OpenSSL project reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://openssl-library.org/news/secadv/20260313.txt">
	  <p>TLS 1.3 server may choose unexpected key agreement group (Low)</p>
	  <p>An OpenSSL TLS 1.3 server may fail to negotiate the expected
	    preferred key exchange group when its key exchange group configuration includes
	    the default by using the "DEFAULT" keyword.</p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-2673</cvename>
      <url>https://openssl-library.org/news/secadv/20260313.txt</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-03-13</discovery>
      <entry>2026-03-13</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="b45d25ab-1de3-11f1-8aff-b42e991fc52e">
    <topic>Mozilla -- Undefined behavior in the DOM: Core &amp; HTML component</topic>
    <affects>
    <package>
	<name>firefox</name>
	<range><lt>148.0.0,2</lt></range>
    </package>
    <package>
	<name>firefox-esr</name>
	<range><lt>140.8.0,2</lt></range>
    </package>
    <package>
	<name>thunderbird</name>
	<range><lt>148.0.0</lt></range>
    </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2014593 reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2014593">
	  <p>Undefined behavior in the DOM: Core &amp; HTML component.</p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-2771</cvename>
      <url>https://cveawg.mitre.org/api/cve/CVE-2026-2771</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-02-24</discovery>
      <entry>2026-03-12</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="e1e40d50-1de2-11f1-8aff-b42e991fc52e">
    <topic>Firefox -- Same-origin policy bypass</topic>
    <affects>
    <package>
	<name>firefox</name>
	<range><lt>148.0.2,2</lt></range>
    </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2018400 reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2018400">
	  <p>Same-origin policy bypass in the CSS Parsing and
	    Computation component.</p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-3846</cvename>
      <url>https://cveawg.mitre.org/api/cve/CVE-2026-3846</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-03-10</discovery>
      <entry>2026-03-12</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="df82f42c-1de2-11f1-8aff-b42e991fc52e">
    <topic>firefox -- Memory safety bugs</topic>
    <affects>
    <package>
	<name>firefox</name>
	<range><lt>148.0.2,2</lt></range>
    </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/buglist.cgi?bug_id=2017513%2C2017622%2C2019341 reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/buglist.cgi?bug_id=2017513%2C2017622%2C2019341">
	  <p>Memory safety bugs present in Firefox 148.0.2.  Some of
	  these bugs showed evidence of memory corruption and we
	  presume that with enough effort some of these could have
	  been exploited to run arbitrary code.</p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-3847</cvename>
      <url>https://cveawg.mitre.org/api/cve/CVE-2026-3847</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-03-10</discovery>
      <entry>2026-03-12</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="0236eab0-1d62-11f1-88f8-2cf05da270f3">
    <topic>Gitlab -- vulnerabilities</topic>
    <affects>
<package>
<name>gitlab-ce</name>
<name>gitlab-ee</name>
<range><ge>18.9.0</ge><lt>18.9.2</lt></range>
<range><ge>18.8.0</ge><lt>18.8.6</lt></range>
<range><ge>1.0.0</ge><lt>18.7.6</lt></range>
</package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>Gitlab reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://about.gitlab.com/releases/2026/03/11/patch-release-gitlab-18-9-2-released/">
	  <p>Cross-site Scripting issue in Markdown placeholder processing impacts GitLab CE/EE</p>
	  <p>Denial of Service issue in GraphQL API impacts GitLab CE/EE</p>
	  <p>Denial of Service issue in repository archive endpoint impacts GitLab CE/EE</p>
	  <p>Denial of Service issue in protected branches API impacts GitLab CE/EE</p>
	  <p>Denial of Service issue in webhook custom headers impacts GitLab CE/EE</p>
	  <p>Denial of Service issue in webhook endpoint impacts GitLab CE/EE</p>
	  <p>Improper Neutralization of CRLF Sequences issue impacts GitLab CE/EE</p>
	  <p>Improper Access Control issue in runners API impacts GitLab CE/EE</p>
	  <p>Improper Access Control issue in snippet rendering impacts GitLab CE/EE</p>
	  <p>Information Disclosure issue in inaccessible issues impacts GitLab CE/EE</p>
	  <p>Missing Authorization issue in Group Import impacts GitLab CE/EE</p>
	  <p>Incorrect Reference issue in repository download impacts GitLab CE/EE</p>
	  <p>Incorrect Authorization issue in Virtual Registry impacts GitLab EE</p>
	  <p>Improper Escaping of Output issue in Datadog integration impacts GitLab CE/EE</p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-1090</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-1069</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2025-13929</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2025-14513</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2025-13690</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2025-12576</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-3848</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2025-12555</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-0602</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-1732</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-1663</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-1230</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2025-12704</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2025-12697</cvename>
      <url>https://about.gitlab.com/releases/2026/03/11/patch-release-gitlab-18-9-2-released/</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-03-11</discovery>
      <entry>2026-03-11</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="086d53fa-1d47-11f1-81da-8447094a420f">
    <topic>curl -- Multiple vulnerabilities</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
	<name>curl</name>
	<range><lt>8.18.0</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>The curl project reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://curl.se/docs/vuln-8.17.0.html">
	  <p>Multiple vulnerabilities</p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2025-15224</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2025-15079</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2025-14819</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2025-14524</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2025-14017</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2025-13034</cvename>
      <url>https://curl.se/docs/vuln-8.17.0.html</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-01-06</discovery>
      <entry>2026-03-11</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="1933737d-1d46-11f1-81da-8447094a420f">
    <topic>curl -- Multiple vulnerabilties</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
	<name>curl</name>
	<range><lt>8.19.0</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>The curl project reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://curl.se/docs/vuln-8.18.0.html">
	  <ul>
	    <li>use after free in SMB connection reuse</li>
	    <li>wrong proxy connection reuse with credentials</li>
	    <li>token leak with redirect and netrc</li>
	    <li>bad reuse of HTTP Negotiate connection</li>
	  </ul>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-3805</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-3784</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-3783</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-1965</cvename>
      <url>https://curl.se/docs/vuln-8.18.0.html</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-03-11</discovery>
      <entry>2026-03-11</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="791d4b29-19fb-11f1-87cc-e73692421fef">
    <topic>gstreamer1 -- multiple vulnerabilities</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
	<name>gstreamer1</name>
	<range><lt>1.28.1</lt></range>
      </package>
      <package>
	<name>gstreamer1-plugins</name>
	<range><lt>1.28.1</lt></range>
      </package>
      <package>
	<name>gstreamer1-plugins-good</name>
	<range><lt>1.28.1</lt></range>
      </package>
      <package>
	<name>gstreamer1-plugins-bad</name>
	<range><lt>1.28.1</lt></range>
      </package>
      <package>
	<name>gstreamer1-plugins-ugly</name>
	<range><lt>1.28.1</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>The GStreamer project reports multiple security vulnerabilities fixed in the 1.28.1 release:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://gstreamer.freedesktop.org/security/">
	  <p>Twelve security vulnerabilities were addressed, including:</p>
	  <ul>
	    <li>Out-of-bounds reads and writes in the H.266 video parser, WAV parser,
	    MP4 and ASF demuxers, and DVB subtitle decoder.</li>
	    <li>Integer overflows in the RIFF parser and Huffman table handling in the JPEG parser.</li>
	    <li>Stack buffer overflows in the RTP QDM2 depayloader and H.266 parser.</li>
	  </ul>
	  <p>These could lead to application crashes or potentially arbitrary code execution.</p>
	</blockquote>
      </body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-1940</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-3082</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-2921</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-2922</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-2920</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-2923</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-3083</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-3085</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-3086</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-3081</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-3084</cvename>
      <url>https://gstreamer.freedesktop.org/security/sa-2026-0001.html</url>
      <url>https://gstreamer.freedesktop.org/security/sa-2026-0002.html</url>
      <url>https://gstreamer.freedesktop.org/security/sa-2026-0003.html</url>
      <url>https://gstreamer.freedesktop.org/security/sa-2026-0004.html</url>
      <url>https://gstreamer.freedesktop.org/security/sa-2026-0005.html</url>
      <url>https://gstreamer.freedesktop.org/security/sa-2026-0006.html</url>
      <url>https://gstreamer.freedesktop.org/security/sa-2026-0007.html</url>
      <url>https://gstreamer.freedesktop.org/security/sa-2026-0008.html</url>
      <url>https://gstreamer.freedesktop.org/security/sa-2026-0009.html</url>
      <url>https://gstreamer.freedesktop.org/security/sa-2026-0010.html</url>
      <url>https://gstreamer.freedesktop.org/security/sa-2026-0011.html</url>
      <url>https://gstreamer.freedesktop.org/security/sa-2026-0012.html</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-02-25</discovery>
      <entry>2026-03-07</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="10319b08-f050-4beb-95e3-fe025cdafd25">
    <topic>oauth2-proxy -- multiple vulnerabilities</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
	<name>oauth2-proxy</name>
	<range><lt>7.14.2</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>During session resumption in crypto/tls, if the underlying Config has its ClientCAs or RootCAs fields mutated between the initial handshake and the resumed handshake, the resumed handshake may succeed when it should have failed.</p>
      </body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2025-68121</cvename>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-02-05</discovery>
      <entry>2026-02-27</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="15f4e0f6-1338-11f1-a55d-b42e991fc52e">
    <topic>Mozilla -- Multiple vulnerabilities</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
      <name>firefox</name>
      <range><lt>148.0.0,2</lt></range>
      </package>
      <package>
      <name>firefox-esr</name>
      <range><lt>140.8.0,2</lt></range>
      </package>
      <package>
      <name>thunderbird</name>
      <range><lt>148.0.0</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>CVE-2026-2809: Memory safety bug in the JavaScript: WebAssembly component.</p>
	<p>CVE-2026-2808: Integer overflow in the JavaScript: Standard Library component.</p>
      </body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-2809</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-2808</cvename>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-02-24</discovery>
      <entry>2026-02-26</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="1124a7b0-1338-11f1-a55d-b42e991fc52e">
    <topic>Firefox -- Multiple vulnerabilities</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
      <name>firefox</name>
      <range><lt>148.0.0,2</lt></range>
      </package>
      <package>
      <name>thunderbird</name>
      <range><lt>148.0.0</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>CVE-2026-2807: Memory safety bugs present in Firefox 147 and Thunderbird 147</p>
	<p>CVE-2026-2806: Uninitialized memory in the Graphics: Text component.</p>
	<p>CVE-2026-2805: Invalid pointer in the DOM: Core &amp; HTML component.</p>
	<p>CVE-2026-2804: Use-after-free in the JavaScript: WebAssembly component.</p>
	<p>CVE-2026-2803: Information disclosure, mitigation bypass in the Settings
      UI component.</p>
	<p>CVE-2026-2802: Race condition in the JavaScript: GC component.</p>
	<p>CVE-2026-2801: Incorrect boundary conditions in the JavaScript:
      WebAssembly component.</p>
	<p>CVE-2026-2799: Use-after-free in the DOM: Core &amp; HTML component.</p>
	<p>CVE-2026-2798: Use-after-free in the DOM: Core &amp; HTML component.</p>
	<p>CVE-2026-2797: Use-after-free in the JavaScript: GC component.</p>
	<p>CVE-2026-2796: JIT miscompilation in the JavaScript: WebAssembly component</p>
	<p>CVE-2026-2795: Use-after-free in the JavaScript: GC component.</p>
      </body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-2807</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-2806</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-2805</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-2804</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-2803</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-2802</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-2801</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-2799</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-2798</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-2797</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-2796</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-2795</cvename>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-02-24</discovery>
      <entry>2026-02-26</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="102a03c9-1316-11f1-93ca-2cf05da270f3">
    <topic>Gitlab -- vulnerabilities</topic>
    <affects>
<package>
<name>gitlab-ce</name>
<name>gitlab-ee</name>
<range><ge>18.9.0</ge><lt>18.9.1</lt></range>
<range><ge>18.8.0</ge><lt>18.8.5</lt></range>
<range><ge>9.0.0</ge><lt>18.7.5</lt></range>
</package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>Gitlab reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://about.gitlab.com/releases/2026/02/25/patch-release-gitlab-18-9-1-released/">
	  <p>Cross-site Scripting issue in Mermaid sandbox impacts GitLab CE/EE</p>
	  <p>Denial of Service issue in container registry impacts GitLab CE/EE</p>
	  <p>Denial of Service issue in Jira events endpoint impacts GitLab CE/EE</p>
	  <p>Regular Expression Denial of Service issue in GitLab merge requests impacts GitLab CE/EE</p>
	  <p>Missing rate limit in Bitbucket Server importer impacts GitLab CE/EE</p>
	  <p>Denial of Service issue in CI trigger API impacts GitLab CE/EE</p>
	  <p>Denial of Service issue in token decoder impacts GitLab CE/EE</p>
	  <p>Improper Access Control issue in Conan package registry impacts GitLab EE</p>
	  <p>Access Control issue in CI job mutation impacts GitLab CE/EE</p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-0752</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2025-14511</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-1662</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-1388</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-2845</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2025-3525</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-1725</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-1747</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2025-14103</cvename>
      <url>https://about.gitlab.com/releases/2026/02/25/patch-release-gitlab-18-9-1-released/</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-02-25</discovery>
      <entry>2026-02-26</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="fe6209a3-126c-11f1-8a62-0897988a1c07">
    <topic>mail/mailpit -- Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) via Link Check API</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
	<name>mailpit</name>
	<range><lt>1.29.2</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>Mailpit author reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://github.com/axllent/mailpit/security/advisories/GHSA-mpf7-p9x7-96r3">
	  <p>The Link Check API (/api/v1/message/{ID}/link-check)
	  is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF). The
	  server performs HTTP HEAD requests to every URL found in
	  an email without validating target hosts or filtering
	  private/internal IP addresses. The response returns status
	  codes and status text per link, making this a non-blind
	  SSRF. In the default configuration (no authentication on
	  SMTP or API), this is fully exploitable remotely with
	  zero user interaction.</p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-27808</cvename>
      <url>https://github.com/axllent/mailpit/security/advisories/GHSA-mpf7-p9x7-96r3</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-02-25</discovery>
      <entry>2026-02-25</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="fbc47390-11e9-11f1-8148-bc241121aa0a">
    <topic>FreeBSD -- Local DoS and possible privilege escalation via routing sockets</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
	<name>FreeBSD-kernel</name>
	<range><ge>15.0</ge><lt>15.0_4</lt></range>
	<range><ge>14.3</ge><lt>14.3_9</lt></range>
	<range><ge>13.5</ge><lt>13.5_10</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<h1>Problem Description:</h1>
	<p>The rtsock_msg_buffer() function serializes routing information
	into a buffer.  As a part of this, it copies sockaddr structures
	into a sockaddr_storage structure on the stack.  It assumes that
	the source sockaddr length field had already been validated, but
	this is not necessarily the case, and it's possible for a malicious
	userspace program to craft a request which triggers a 127-byte
	overflow.</p>
	<p>In practice, this overflow immediately overwrites the canary for
	the rtsock_msg_buffer() stack frame, resulting in a panic once the
	function returns.</p>
	<h1>Impact:</h1>
	<p>The bug allows an unprivileged user to crash the kernel by
	triggering a stack buffer overflow in rtsock_msg_buffer().  In
	particular, the overflow will corrupt a stack canary value that is
	verified when the function returns; this mitigates the impact of
	the stack overflow by triggering a kernel panic.</p>
	<p>Other kernel bugs may exist which allow userspace to find the canary
	value and thus defeat the mitigation, at which point local privilege
	escalation may be possible.</p>
      </body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-3038</cvename>
      <freebsdsa>SA-26:05.route</freebsdsa>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-02-24</discovery>
      <entry>2026-02-25</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="a88f5b2d-11e9-11f1-8148-bc241121aa0a">
    <topic>FreeBSD -- Jail chroot escape via fd exchange with a different jail</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
	<name>FreeBSD-kernel</name>
	<range><ge>14.3</ge><lt>14.3_9</lt></range>
	<range><ge>13.5</ge><lt>13.5_10</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<h1>Problem Description:</h1>
	<p>If two sibling jails are restricted to separate filesystem
	trees, which is to say that neither of the two jail root directories
	is an ancestor of the other, jailed processes may nonetheless be
	able to access a shared directory via a nullfs mount, if the
	administrator has configured one.</p>
	<p>In this case, cooperating processes in the two jails may establish
	a connection using a unix domain socket and exchange directory
	descriptors with each other.</p>
	<p>When performing a filesystem name lookup, at each step of the lookup,
	the kernel checks whether the lookup would descend below the jail
	root of the current process.  If the jail root directory is not
	encountered, the lookup continues.</p>
	<h1>Impact:</h1>
	<p>In a configuration where processes in two different jails are
	able to exchange file descriptors using a unix domain socket, it
	is possible for a jailed process to receive a directory for a
	descriptor that is below that process' jail root.  This enables
	full filesystem access for a jailed process, breaking the chroot.</p>
	<p>Note that the system administrator is still responsible for ensuring
	that an unprivileged user on the jail host is not able to pass
	directory descriptors to a jailed process, even in a patched
	kernel.</p>
      </body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2025-15576</cvename>
      <freebsdsa>SA-26:04.jail</freebsdsa>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-02-24</discovery>
      <entry>2026-02-25</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="4594110e-1151-11f1-b3f8-8447094a420f">
    <topic>Vaultwarden -- Multiple vulnerabilities</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
	<name>vaultwarden</name>
	<range><lt>1.35.4</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>The Vaultwarden project reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://github.com/dani-garcia/vaultwarden/releases/tag/1.35.4">
	  <ul>
	    <li>GHSA-w9f8-m526-h7fh. This vulnerability would allow an attacker to access a cipher from a different user (fully encrypted) if they already know its internal UUID.</li>
	    <li>GHSA-h4hq-rgvh-wh27. This vulnerability allows an attacker with manager-level access within an organization to modify collections they can access, even if they do not have management permissions for them.</li>
	    <li>GHSA-r32r-j5jq-3w4m. This vulnerability allows an attacker with manager-level access within an organization to modify collections they are not assigned.</li>
	  </ul>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <url>https://github.com/dani-garcia/vaultwarden/releases/tag/1.35.4</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-02-23</discovery>
      <entry>2026-02-24</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="716d25a6-0fdc-11f1-bfdf-ff9355aecb00">
    <topic>openexr -- buffer overflow in istream_nonparallel_read on invalid input data</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
	<name>openexr</name>
	<range><lt>3.3.7</lt></range>
	<range><ge>3.4.0</ge><lt>3.4.5</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>Cary Phillips reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://github.com/AcademySoftwareFoundation/openexr/releases/tag/v3.4.5">
	  <p>[openexr] v3.4.5 [...] fixes an incorrect size check in istream_nonparallel_read that could lead to a buffer overflow on invalid input data.</p>
	</blockquote>
      </body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <url>https://github.com/AcademySoftwareFoundation/openexr/releases/tag/v3.4.5</url>
      <url>https://github.com/AcademySoftwareFoundation/openexr/commit/6bb2ddf1068573d073edf81270a015b38cc05cef</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-02-16</discovery>
      <entry>2026-02-22</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="428e782a-0e92-11f1-a9b1-0cc47ada5f32">
    <topic>jenkins -- multiple vulnerabilities</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
	<name>jenkins</name>
	<range><lt>2.551</lt></range>
      </package>
      <package>
	<name>jenkins-lts</name>
	<range><lt>2.541.2</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>Jenkins Security Advisory:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://www.jenkins.io/security/advisory/2026-02-18/">
	  <h1>Description</h1>
	  <h5>(High) SECURITY-3669 / CVE-2026-27099</h5>
	  <p>Stored XSS vulnerability in node offline cause description</p>
	  <h5>(Medium) SECURITY-3658 / CVE-2026-27100</h5>
	  <p>Build information disclosure vulnerability through Run Parameter</p>
	</blockquote>
      </body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-27099</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-27100</cvename>
      <url>https://www.jenkins.io/security/advisory/2026-02-18/</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-02-18</discovery>
      <entry>2026-02-20</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="6a81dc74-0e8b-11f1-b7d1-b42e991fc52e">
    <topic>Mozilla -- Heap buffer overflow</topic>
    <affects>
    <package>
	<name>firefox</name>
	<range><lt>147.0.4,2</lt></range>
    </package>
    <package>
	<name>firefox-esr</name>
	<range><lt>140.7.1,2</lt></range>
    </package>
    <package>
	<name>thunderbird</name>
	<range><lt>147.0.2</lt></range>
    </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2014390 reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2014390">
	  <p>Heap buffer overflow in libvpx.</p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-2447</cvename>
      <url>https://cveawg.mitre.org/api/cve/CVE-2026-2447</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-02-16</discovery>
      <entry>2026-02-20</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="a977cb1c-0d7d-11f1-85c5-a8a1599412c6">
    <topic>chromium -- security fixes</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
       <name>chromium</name>
       <range><lt>145.0.7632.109</lt></range>
      </package>
      <package>
       <name>ungoogled-chromium</name>
       <range><lt>145.0.7632.109</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
       <p>Chrome Releases reports:</p>
       <blockquote cite="https://chromereleases.googleblog.com/2026/02/stable-channel-update-for-desktop_18.html">
	 <p>This update includes 3 security fixes:</p>
	 <ul>
	    <li>[477033835] High CVE-2026-2648: Heap buffer overflow in PDFium. Reported by soiax on 2026-01-19</li>
	    <li>[481074858] High CVE-2026-2649: Integer overflow in V8. Reported by JunYoung Park(@candymate) of KAIST Hacking Lab on 2026-02-03</li>
	    <li>[476461867] Medium CVE-2026-2650: Heap buffer overflow in Media. Reported by Google on 2026-01-18</li>
	 </ul>
       </blockquote>
      </body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-2648</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-2649</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-2650</cvename>
      <url>https://chromereleases.googleblog.com/2026/02/stable-channel-update-for-desktop_18.html</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-02-18</discovery>
      <entry>2026-02-19</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="67793feb-0b5b-11f1-a1c0-0050569f0b83">
    <topic>powerdns-recursor -- Denial of Service</topic>
    <affects>
    <package>
	<name>powerdns-recursor</name>
	<range><lt>5.3.5</lt></range>
    </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>PowerDNS Team reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://blog.powerdns.com/2025/12/08/powerdns-security-advisories-2025-07-and-2025-08">
	<p>2025-07: Internal logic flaw in cache management can lead to
	a denial of service in Recursor</p>
	<p>2025-08: Insufficient validation of incoming notifies over
	TCP can lead to a denial of service in Recursor</p>
	<p>2026-01: Crafted zones can lead to increased resource usage in Recursor</p>
	<p>2026-01: This problem can be triggered by publishing and querying a crafted
	zone that causes large memory usage.</p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2025-59029</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2025-59030</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-24027</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-0398</cvename>
      <url>https://doc.powerdns.com/recursor/security-advisories/powerdns-advisory-2025-07.html</url>
      <url>https://doc.powerdns.com/recursor/security-advisories/powerdns-advisory-2025-08.html</url>
      <url>https://docs.powerdns.com/recursor/security-advisories/powerdns-advisory-2026-01.html</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2025-12-08</discovery>
      <entry>2026-02-16</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="f9cb72e4-0b52-11f1-8e75-b42e991fc52e">
    <topic>png -- CWE-122: Heap-based Buffer Overflow</topic>
    <affects>
    <package>
	<name>png</name>
	<range><lt>1.6.55</lt></range>
    </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>https://github.com/pnggroup/libpng/security/advisories/GHSA-g8hp-mq4h-rqm3 reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://github.com/pnggroup/libpng/security/advisories/GHSA-g8hp-mq4h-rqm3">
	  <p>LIBPNG is a reference library for use in applications
	  that read, create, and manipulate PNG (Portable Network
	  Graphics) raster image files.  Prior to 1.6.55, an
	  out-of-bounds read vulnerability exists in the
	  png_set_quantize() API function.  When the function is
	  called with no histogram and the number of colors in the
	  palette is more than twice the maximum supported by the
	  user's display, certain palettes will cause the function to
	  enter into an infinite loop that reads past the end of an
	  internal heap-allocated buffer.  The images that trigger
	  this vulnerability are valid per the PNG specification.
	  This vulnerability is fixed in 1.6.55.</p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-25646</cvename>
      <url>https://cveawg.mitre.org/api/cve/CVE-2026-25646</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-02-10</discovery>
      <entry>2026-02-16</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="590979aa-09f7-11f1-a730-5404a68ad561">
    <topic>traefik -- TCP readTimeout bypass via STARTTLS on Postgres</topic>
    <affects>
    <package>
	<name>traefik</name>
	<range><lt>3.6.8</lt></range>
    </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>The traefik project reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://github.com/traefik/traefik/security/advisories/GHSA-89p3-4642-cr2w">
	  <p>There is a potential vulnerability in Traefik managing STARTTLS requests.
	     An unauthenticated client can bypass Traefik entrypoint respondingTimeouts.readTimeout
	     by sending the 8-byte Postgres SSLRequest (STARTTLS) prelude and then stalling,
	     causing connections to remain open indefinitely, leading to a denial of service</p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-25949</cvename>
      <url>https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-25949</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-02-11</discovery>
      <entry>2026-02-14</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="17186409-09d2-11f1-a39c-b42e991fc52e">
    <topic>munge -- CWE-787: Out-of-bounds Write</topic>
    <affects>
    <package>
	<name>munge</name>
	<range><lt>0.5.18</lt></range>
    </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>https://github.com/dun/munge/security/advisories/GHSA-r9cr-jf4v-75gh reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://github.com/dun/munge/security/advisories/GHSA-r9cr-jf4v-75gh">
	  <p>MUNGE is an authentication service for creating and
	  validating user credentials.  From 0.5 to 0.5.17, local
	  attacker can exploit a buffer overflow vulnerability in
	  munged (the MUNGE authentication daemon) to leak
	  cryptographic key material from process memory.  With the
	  leaked key material, the attacker could forge arbitrary
	  MUNGE credentials to impersonate any user (including root)
	  to services that rely on MUNGE for authentication.  The
	  vulnerability allows a buffer overflow by sending a crafted
	  message with an oversized address length field, corrupting
	  munged's internal state and enabling extraction of the MAC
	  subkey used for credential verification.  This vulnerability
	  is fixed in 0.5.18.</p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-25506</cvename>
      <url>https://cveawg.mitre.org/api/cve/CVE-2026-25506</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-02-10</discovery>
      <entry>2026-02-14</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="424d598b-09c4-11f1-85c5-a8a1599412c6">
    <topic>chromium -- security fix</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
       <name>chromium</name>
       <range><lt>145.0.7632.75</lt></range>
      </package>
      <package>
       <name>ungoogled-chromium</name>
       <range><lt>145.0.7632.75</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
       <p>Chrome Releases reports:</p>
       <blockquote cite="https://chromereleases.googleblog.com/2026/02/stable-channel-update-for-desktop_13.html">
	 <p>This update includes 1 security fix:</p>
	 <ul>
	    <li>[483569511] High CVE-2026-2441: Use after free in CSS. Reported by Shaheen Fazim on 2026-02-11</li>
	 </ul>
       </blockquote>
      </body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-2441</cvename>
      <url>https://chromereleases.googleblog.com/2026/02/stable-channel-update-for-desktop_13.html</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-02-13</discovery>
      <entry>2026-02-14</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="027c6c07-065b-11f1-baae-589cfc023192">
    <topic>expat -- multiple vulnerabilities</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
       <name>expat</name>
       <range><lt>2.7.4</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
      <p>expat team reports:</p>
      <blockquote cite="https://github.com/libexpat/libexpat/blob/R_2_7_4/expat/Changes">
       <p>Update contains 2 security fixes:</p>
       <ul>
       <li>CVE-2026-24515: NULL dereference in function XML_ExternalEntityParserCreate</li>
       <li>CVE-2026-25210: missing check for integer overflow in function doContent</li>
       </ul>
      </blockquote>
      </body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-24515</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-25210</cvename>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-01-31</discovery>
      <entry>2026-02-10</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="e3afc190-0821-11f1-a857-6cc21735f730">
    <topic>PostgreSQL -- Multiple vulnerabilities</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
       <name>postgresql14-server</name>
       <range><lt>14.21</lt></range>
      </package>
      <package>
       <name>postgresql15-server</name>
       <range><lt>15.16</lt></range>
      </package>
      <package>
       <name>postgresql16-server</name>
       <range><lt>16.12</lt></range>
      </package>
      <package>
       <name>postgresql17-server</name>
       <range><lt>17.8</lt></range>
      </package>
      <package>
       <name>postgresql18-server</name>
       <range><lt>18.2</lt></range>
      </package>
      <package>
       <name>postgresql14-server</name>
       <range><lt>14.21</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>The PostgreSQL project reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://www.postgresql.org/about/news/postgresql-182-178-1612-1516-and-1421-released-3235/">
	<p>
	  Improper validation of type oidvector in PostgreSQL
	  allows a database user to disclose a few bytes of server
	  memory. We have not ruled out viability of attacks that
	  arrange for presence of confidential information in
	  disclosed bytes, but they seem unlikely.
	</p>
	<p>
	  Missing validation of type of input in PostgreSQL
	  intarray extension selectivity estimator function allows
	  an object creator to execute arbitrary code as the
	  operating system user running the database.
	</p>
	<p>
	  Heap buffer overflow in PostgreSQL pgcrypto allows a
	  ciphertext provider to execute arbitrary code as the
	  operating system user running the database.
	</p>
	<p>
	  Missing validation of multibyte character length in
	  PostgreSQL text manipulation allows a database user to
	  issue crafted queries that achieve a buffer overrun.
	  That suffices to execute arbitrary code as the operating
	  system user running the database.
	</p>
	<p>
	  Heap buffer overflow in PostgreSQL pg_trgm allows a
	  database user to achieve unknown impacts via a crafted
	  input string. The attacker has limited control over the
	  byte patterns to be written, but we have not ruled out
	  the viability of attacks that lead to privilege
	  escalation.
	</p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-2003</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-2004</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-2005</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-2006</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-2007</cvename>
      <url>https://www.postgresql.org/about/news/postgresql-182-178-1612-1516-and-1421-released-3235/</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-02-12</discovery>
      <entry>2026-02-12</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="7f9bac32-0800-11f1-8a6f-b42e991fc52e">
    <topic>MongoDB Server -- CWE-704 Incorrect Type Conversion or Cast</topic>
    <affects>
    <package>
	<name>mongodb70</name>
	<range><lt>7.0.29</lt></range>
    </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>https://jira.mongodb.org/browse/SERVER-113685 reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://jira.mongodb.org/browse/SERVER-113685">
	  <p>An authorized user may disable the MongoDB server by
	  issuing a query against a collection that contains an
	  invalid compound wildcard index.</p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-25613</cvename>
      <url>https://cveawg.mitre.org/api/cve/CVE-2026-25613</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-02-10</discovery>
      <entry>2026-02-12</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="7b5671f9-0800-11f1-8a6f-b42e991fc52e">
    <topic>MongoDB Server -- CWE-617 Reachable Assertion</topic>
    <affects>
    <package>
	<name>mongodb80</name>
	<range><lt>8.0.13</lt></range>
    </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>https://jira.mongodb.org/browse/SERVER-99119 reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://jira.mongodb.org/browse/SERVER-99119">
	  <p>An authorized user may trigger a server crash by running
	  a $geoNear pipeline with certain invalid index hints.</p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-25610</cvename>
      <url>https://cveawg.mitre.org/api/cve/CVE-2026-25610</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-02-10</discovery>
      <entry>2026-02-12</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="77e32b14-0800-11f1-8a6f-b42e991fc52e">
    <topic>MongoDB Server -- Multiple vulnerabilities</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
	<name>mongodb80</name>
	<range><lt>8.0.18</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>https://jira.mongodb.org/browse/SERVER-114126 reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://jira.mongodb.org/browse/SERVER-114126">
	  <p>Complex queries can cause excessive memory usage in
	  MongoDB Query Planner resulting in an Out-Of-Memory
	    Crash.</p>
	</blockquote>
	<p>https://jira.mongodb.org/browse/SERVER-102364 reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://jira.mongodb.org/browse/SERVER-102364">
	  <p>MongoDB Server may experience an out-of-memory failure while
	  evaluating expressions that produce deeply nested documents. The
	  issue arises in recursive functions because the server does not
	    periodically check the depth of the expression.</p>
	</blockquote>
	<p>https://jira.mongodb.org/browse/SERVER-113532 reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://jira.mongodb.org/browse/SERVER-113532">
	  <p>Inserting certain large documents into a replica set could lead to
	  replica set secondaries not being able to fetch the oplog from the
	  primary. This could stall replication inside the replica set leading
	    to server crash.</p>
	</blockquote>
      </body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-1850</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-1849</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-1847</cvename>
      <url>https://cveawg.mitre.org/api/cve/CVE-2026-1850</url>
      <url>https://cveawg.mitre.org/api/cve/CVE-2026-1849</url>
      <url>https://cveawg.mitre.org/api/cve/CVE-2026-1847</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-02-10</discovery>
      <entry>2026-02-12</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="9d9940e7-071c-11f1-93ca-2cf05da270f3">
    <topic>Gitlab -- vulnerabilities</topic>
    <affects>
<package>
<name>gitlab-ce</name>
<name>gitlab-ee</name>
<range><ge>18.8.0</ge><lt>18.8.4</lt></range>
<range><ge>18.7.0</ge><lt>18.7.4</lt></range>
<range><ge>8.0.0</ge><lt>18.6.6</lt></range>
</package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>Gitlab reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://about.gitlab.com/releases/2026/02/10/patch-release-gitlab-18-8-4-released/">
	  <p>Incomplete Validation issue in Web IDE impacts GitLab CE/EE</p>
	  <p>Denial of Service issue in GraphQL introspection impacts GitLab CE/EE</p>
	  <p>Denial of Service issue in JSON validation middleware impacts GitLab CE/EE</p>
	  <p>Cross-site Scripting issue in Code Flow impacts GitLab CE/EE</p>
	  <p>HTML Injection issue in test case titles impacts GitLab CE/EE</p>
	  <p>Denial of Service issue in Markdown processor impacts GitLab CE/EE</p>
	  <p>Denial of Service issue in Markdown Preview impacts GitLab CE/EE</p>
	  <p>Denial of Service issue in dashboard impacts GitLab EE</p>
	  <p>Server-Side Request Forgery issue in Virtual Registry impacts GitLab EE</p>
	  <p>Improper Validation issue in diff parser impacts GitLab CE/EE</p>
	  <p>Server-Side Request Forgery issue in Git repository import impacts GitLab CE/EE</p>
	  <p>Authorization Bypass issue in iterations API impacts GitLab EE</p>
	  <p>Missing Authorization issue in GLQL API impacts GitLab CE/EE</p>
	  <p>Stored HTML Injection issue in project label impacts GitLab CE/EE</p>
	  <p>Authorization Bypass issue in Pipeline Schedules API impacts GitLab CE/EE</p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2025-7659</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2025-8099</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-0958</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2025-14560</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-0595</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-1458</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-1456</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-1387</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2025-12575</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-1094</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2025-12073</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-1080</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2025-14592</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-1282</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2025-14594</cvename>
      <url>https://about.gitlab.com/releases/2026/02/10/patch-release-gitlab-18-8-4-released/</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-02-10</discovery>
      <entry>2026-02-11</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="8d8012e5-0705-11f1-8148-bc241121aa0a">
    <topic>FreeBSD -- blocklistd(8) socket leak</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
	<name>FreeBSD</name>
	<range><ge>15.0</ge><lt>15.0_3</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<h1>Problem Description:</h1>
	<p>Due to a programming error, blocklistd leaks a socket descriptor
	for each adverse event report it receives.</p>
	<p>Once a certain number of leaked sockets is reached, blocklistd
	becomes unable to run the helper script: a child process is forked,
	but this child dereferences a null pointer and crashes before it
	is able to exec the helper.  At this point, blocklistd still records
	adverse events but is unable to block new addresses or unblock
	addresses whose database entries have expired.</p>
	<p>Once a second, much higher number of leaked sockets is reached,
	blocklistd becomes unable to receive new adverse event reports.</p>
	<h1>Impact:</h1>
	<p>An attacker may take advantage of this by triggering a large
	number of adverse events from sacrificial IP addresses to effectively
	disable blocklistd before launching an attack.</p>
	<p>Even in the absence of attacks or probes by would-be attackers,
	adverse events will occur regularly in the course of normal operations,
	and blocklistd will gradually run out file descriptors and become
	ineffective.</p>
	<p>The accumulation of open sockets may have knock-on effects on other
	parts of the system, resulting in a general slowdown until blocklistd
	is restarted.</p>
      </body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-2261</cvename>
      <freebsdsa>SA-26:03.blocklistd</freebsdsa>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-02-10</discovery>
      <entry>2026-02-11</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="9bc5a730-0585-11f1-85c5-a8a1599412c6">
    <topic>chromium -- multiple security fixes</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
       <name>chromium</name>
       <range><lt>144.0.7559.132</lt></range>
      </package>
      <package>
       <name>ungoogled-chromium</name>
       <range><lt>144.0.7559.132</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
       <p>Chrome Releases reports:</p>
       <blockquote cite="https://chromereleases.googleblog.com/2026/02/stable-channel-update-for-desktop.html">
	 <p>This update includes 2 security fixes:</p>
	 <ul>
	    <li>[478942410] High CVE-2026-1861: Heap buffer overflow in libvpx. Reported by Google on 2026-01-26</li>
	    <li>[479726070] High CVE-2026-1862: Type Confusion in V8. Reported by Chaoyuan Peng (@ret2happy) on 2026-01-29</li>
	 </ul>
       </blockquote>
      </body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-1861</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-1862</cvename>
      <url>https://chromereleases.googleblog.com/2026/02/stable-channel-update-for-desktop.html</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-02-03</discovery>
      <entry>2026-02-09</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="f301a241-04d3-11f1-a38c-8447094a420f">
    <topic>Roundcube -- Multiple vulnerabilities</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
	<name>roundcube-php82</name>
	<name>roundcube-php83</name>
	<name>roundcube-php84</name>
	<name>roundcube-php85</name>
	<range><lt>1.6.13,1</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>The Roundcube project reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://github.com/roundcube/roundcubemail/releases/tag/1.6.13">
	  <p>Unspecified CSS injection vulnerability.</p>
	  <p>Remote image blocking bypass via SVG content.</p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <url>https://github.com/roundcube/roundcubemail/releases/tag/1.6.13</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-02-08</discovery>
      <entry>2026-02-08</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="73ff246b-04b2-11f1-84fc-4ccc6adda413">
    <topic>qt6-webengine -- multiple vulnerabilities</topic>
    <affects>
<package>
<name>qt6-pdf</name>
<name>qt6-webengine</name>
<range><lt>6.10.2</lt></range>
</package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>Qt qtwebengine-chromium repo reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://code.qt.io/cgit/qt/qtwebengine-chromium.git/log/?h=134-based">
	  <p>Backports for 7 security bugs in Chromium:</p>
	  <ul>
	    <li>CVE-2025-13638: Prevent media element GC in callbacks in WebMediaPlayerMS</li>
	    <li>CVE-2025-13639: Improve validation of SDP direction in remote description</li>
	    <li>CVE-2025-13720: Avoid downcasting Hash and Integrity reports</li>
	    <li>CVE-2025-14174: Metal: Don't use pixelsDepthPitch to size buffers</li>
	    <li>CVE-2025-14765: Polyfill unary negation and abs for amd mesa frontend</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-0908: Use CheckedNumerics in HandleAllocator</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-1504: Block opaque 416 responses to non-range requests</li>
	  </ul>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2025-13638</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2025-13639</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2025-13720</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2025-14174</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2025-14765</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-0908</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-1504</cvename>
      <url>https://code.qt.io/cgit/qt/qtwebengine-chromium.git/log/?h=134-based</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-02-02</discovery>
      <entry>2026-02-08</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="a6effa17-1fd4-4895-8471-d5c684d7807c">
    <topic>navidrome -- multiple vulnerabilities</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
	<name>navidrome</name>
	<range><lt>0.60.0</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>An XSS vulnerability in the frontend allows a malicious attacker to inject code through the comment metadata of a song to exfiltrate user credentials.</p>
	<p>Authenticated users can crash the Navidrome server by supplying an excessively large size parameter to /rest/getCoverArt or to a shared-image URL (/share/img/{token}). When processing such requests, the server attempts to create an extremely large resized image, causing uncontrolled memory growth. This triggers the Linux OOM killer, terminates the Navidrome process, and results in a full service outage.</p>
      </body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-25578</cvename>
      <url>https://github.com/navidrome/navidrome/security/advisories/GHSA-rh3r-8pxm-hg4w</url>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-25579</cvename>
      <url>https://github.com/navidrome/navidrome/security/advisories/GHSA-hrr4-3wgr-68x3</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-02-03</discovery>
      <entry>2026-02-07</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="1a82bf18-0417-11f1-be6f-5404a68ad561">
    <topic>traefik -- ACME TLS-ALPN fast path potential DoS</topic>
    <affects>
<package>
<name>traefik</name>
<range><lt>3.6.7</lt></range>
</package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>The traefik project reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://github.com/traefik/traefik/security/advisories/GHSA-cwjm-3f7h-9hwq">
	  <p>There is a potential vulnerability in Traefik ACME TLS certificates' automatic
	  generation: the ACME TLS-ALPN fast path can allow unauthenticated clients to
	  tie up goroutines and file descriptors indefinitely when the ACME TLS challenge
	  is enabled.A malicious client can open many connections, send a minimal ClientHello
	  with acme-tls/1, then stop responding, leading to denial of service of the entrypoint.
	  </p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-22045</cvename>
      <url>https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-22045</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-01-15</discovery>
      <entry>2026-02-07</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="bfe9adc8-0224-11f1-8790-c5fb948922ad">
    <topic>python -- several security vulnerabilities</topic>
    <affects>
      <package><name>python310</name> <range><lt>3.10.19_2</lt></range></package>
      <package><name>python311</name> <range><lt>3.11.14_2</lt></range></package>
      <package><name>python312</name> <range><lt>3.12.12_4</lt></range></package>
      <package><name>python313</name> <range><lt>3.13.12</lt></range></package>
      <package><name>python313t</name> <range><lt>3.13.12</lt></range></package>
      <package><name>python314</name> <range><lt>3.14.3</lt></range></package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>The Python project announces a new release with several security fixes:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://docs.python.org/release/3.14.3/whatsnew/changelog.html">
	  <ul>
	    <li>CVE-2026-1299: gh-144125: BytesGenerator will now refuse to serialize (write) headers that are unsafely folded or delimited; see verify_generated_headers. (Contributed by Bas Bloemsaat and Petr Viktorin in gh-121650).</li>
	    <li>gh-143935: Fixed a bug in the folding of comments when flattening an email message using a modern email policy. Comments consisting of a very long sequence of non-foldable characters could trigger a forced line wrap that omitted the required leading space on the continuation line, causing the remainder of the comment to be interpreted as a new header field. This enabled header injection with carefully crafted inputs.</li>
	    <li>gh-143925: Reject control characters in data: URL media types.</li>
	    <li>gh-143919: Reject control characters in http.cookies.Morsel fields and values.</li>
	    <li>CVE-2026-0865: gh-143916: Reject C0 control characters within wsgiref.headers.Headers fields, values, and parameters.</li>
	  </ul>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-1299</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-0865</cvename>
      <url>https://docs.python.org/release/3.14.3/whatsnew/changelog.html</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-01-16</discovery>
      <entry>2026-02-04</entry>
      <modified>2026-03-03</modified>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="232e16cc-fd83-11f0-981a-98b78501ef2a">
    <topic>xrdp -- remote code execution</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
	<name>xrdp</name>
	<range><lt>0.10.5,1</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>Denis Skvortsov, Security Researcher at Kaspersky reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://github.com/neutrinolabs/xrdp/security/advisories/GHSA-rwvg-gp87-gh6f">
	  <p>xrdp before v0.10.5 contains an unauthenticated stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability. The issue stems from improper bounds checking when processing user domain information during the connection sequence. If exploited, the vulnerability could allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on the target system.</p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2025-68670</cvename>
      <url>https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68670</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2025-12-06</discovery>
      <entry>2026-01-27</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="8173e68a-88f3-4862-882c-6e58779d98e7">
    <topic>zeek -- potential DoS vulnerability</topic>
    <affects>
<package>
<name>zeek</name>
<range><lt>8.0.6</lt></range>
</package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>Tim Wojtulewicz of Corelight reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://github.com/zeek/zeek/releases/tag/v8.0.6">
	  <p>Zeek's HTTP analyzer can be tricked into interpreting
	  Transfer-Encoding or Content-Length headers set in MIME
	  entities within HTTP bodies and change the analyzer
	  behavior.</p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <url>https://github.com/zeek/zeek/releases/tag/v8.0.6</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-01-29</discovery>
      <entry>2026-01-29</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="409d70ab-fc23-11f0-85c5-a8a1599412c6">
    <topic>chromium -- security fix</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
       <name>chromium</name>
       <range><lt>144.0.7559.109</lt></range>
      </package>
      <package>
       <name>ungoogled-chromium</name>
       <range><lt>144.0.7559.109</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
       <p>Chrome Releases reports:</p>
       <blockquote cite="https://chromereleases.googleblog.com/2026/01/stable-channel-update-for-desktop_27.html">
	 <p>This update includes 1 security fix:</p>
	 <ul>
	    <li>[474435504] High CVE-2026-1504: Inappropriate implementation in Background Fetch API. Reported by Luan Herrera (@lbherrera_) on 2026-01-09</li>
	 </ul>
       </blockquote>
      </body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-1504</cvename>
      <url>https://chromereleases.googleblog.com/2026/01/stable-channel-update-for-desktop_27.html</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-01-27</discovery>
      <entry>2026-01-28</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="9dac4f05-fc65-11f0-96db-b42e991fc52e">
    <topic>Firefox -- Multiple vulnerabilities</topic>
    <affects>
    <package>
	<name>firefox</name>
	<range><lt>147.0.2,2</lt></range>
    </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2007302 reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2007302">
	  <p>Mitigation bypass in the Privacy: Anti-Tracking component.</p>
	  <p>Use-after-free in the Layout: Scrolling and Overflow component.</p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-24868</cvename>
      <url>https://cveawg.mitre.org/api/cve/CVE-2026-24868</url>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-24869</cvename>
      <url>https://cveawg.mitre.org/api/cve/CVE-2026-24869</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-01-27</discovery>
      <entry>2026-01-28</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="90071333-fbe5-11f0-a13f-bc241121aa0a">
    <topic>FreeBSD -- Jail escape by a privileged user via nullfs</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
	<name>FreeBSD-kernel</name>
	<range><ge>14.3</ge><lt>14.3_8</lt></range>
	<range><ge>13.5</ge><lt>13.5_9</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<h1>Problem Description:</h1>
	  <p>By default, jailed processes cannot mount filesystems, including
	  nullfs(4).  However, the allow.mount.nullfs option enables mounting
	  nullfs filesystems, subject to privilege checks.</p>
	  <p>If a privileged user within a jail is able to nullfs-mount directories,
	  a limitation of the kernel's path lookup logic allows that user to
	  escape the jail's chroot, yielding access to the full filesystem
	  of the host or parent jail.</p>
	<h1>Impact:</h1>
	  <p>In a jail configured to allow nullfs(4) mounts from within the
	  jail, the jailed root user can escape the jail's filesystem root.</p>
      </body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2025-15547</cvename>
      <freebsdsa>SA-26:02.jail</freebsdsa>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-01-27</discovery>
      <entry>2026-01-28</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="4b824428-fb93-11f0-b194-8447094a420f">
    <topic>OpenSSL -- Multiple vulnerabilities</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
	<name>FreeBSD</name>
	<range><ge>15.0</ge><lt>15.0_2</lt></range>
	<range><ge>14.3</ge><lt>14.3_8</lt></range>
	<range><ge>13.5</ge><lt>13.5_9</lt></range>
      </package>
      <package>
	<name>openssl</name>
	<range><lt>3.0.19,1</lt></range>
      </package>
      <package>
	<name>openssl33</name>
	<range><lt>3.3.6</lt></range>
      </package>
      <package>
	<name>openssl34</name>
	<range><lt>3.4.4</lt></range>
      </package>
      <package>
	<name>openssl35</name>
	<range><lt>3.5.5</lt></range>
      </package>
      <package>
	<name>openssl36</name>
	<range><lt>3.6.1</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>The OpenSSL project reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://openssl-library.org/news/secadv/20260127.txt">
	  <ul>
	    <li>Improper validation of PBMAC1 parameters in PKCS#12 MAC verification (CVE-2025-11187)</li>
	    <li>Stack buffer overflow in CMS AuthEnvelopedData parsing (CVE-2025-15467)</li>
	    <li>NULL dereference in SSL_CIPHER_find() function on unknown cipher ID (CVE-2025-15468)</li>
	    <li>"openssl dgst" one-shot codepath silently truncates inputs >16MB (CVE-2025-15469)</li>
	    <li>TLS 1.3 CompressedCertificate excessive memory allocation (CVE-2025-66199)</li>
	    <li>Heap out-of-bounds write in BIO_f_linebuffer on short writes (CVE-2025-68160)</li>
	    <li>Unauthenticated/unencrypted trailing bytes with low-level OCB function calls (CVE-2025-69418)</li>
	    <li>Out of bounds write in PKCS12_get_friendlyname() UTF-8 conversion (CVE-2025-69419)</li>
	    <li>Missing ASN1_TYPE validation in TS_RESP_verify_response() function (CVE-2025-69420)</li>
	    <li>NULL Pointer Dereference in PKCS12_item_decrypt_d2i_ex function (CVE-2025-69421)</li>
	    <li>Missing ASN1_TYPE validation in PKCS#12 parsing (CVE-2026-22795)</li>
	    <li>ASN1_TYPE Type Confusion in the PKCS7_digest_from_attributes() function (CVE-2026-22796)</li>
	  </ul>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2025-11187</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2025-15467</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2025-15468</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2025-15469</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2025-66199</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2025-68160</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2025-69418</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2025-69419</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2025-69420</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2025-69421</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-22795</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-22796</cvename>
      <url>https://openssl-library.org/news/secadv/20260127.txt</url>
      <freebsdsa>SA-26:01.openssl</freebsdsa>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-01-27</discovery>
      <entry>2026-01-27</entry>
      <modified>2026-01-28</modified>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="ab01cb11-f911-11f0-b194-8447094a420f">
    <topic>MySQL -- Multiple vulnerabilities</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
	<name>mysql80-server</name>
	<range><lt>8.0.45</lt></range>
      </package>
      <package>
	<name>mysql84-server</name>
	<range><lt>8.4.8</lt></range>
      </package>
      <package>
	<name>mysql91-server</name>
	<range><lt>9.1.3</lt></range>
      </package>
      <package>
	<name>mysql94-server</name>
	<range><lt>9.4.3</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>Oracle reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpujan2026.html#AppendixMSQL">
	  <p>Oracle reports multiple vulnerabilities in its MySQL server products.</p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-21949</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-21950</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-21968</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-21929</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-21936</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-21937</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-21941</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-21948</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-21952</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-21964</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-21965</cvename>
      <url>https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpujan2026.html#AppendixMSQL</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-01-20</discovery>
      <entry>2026-01-24</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="65439aa0-f77d-11f0-9821-b0416f0c4c67">
    <topic>wheel -- CWE-22: Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal')</topic>
    <affects>
    <package>
	<name>py310-wheel</name>
	<name>py311-wheel</name>
	<name>py312-wheel</name>
	<name>py313-wheel</name>
	<name>py313t-wheel</name>
	<name>py314-wheel</name>
	<range><lt>0.46.2</lt></range>
    </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>https://github.com/pypa/wheel/security/advisories/GHSA-8rrh-rw8j-w5fx reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://github.com/pypa/wheel/security/advisories/GHSA-8rrh-rw8j-w5fx">
	  <p>wheel is a command line tool for manipulating Python wheel files,
as defined in PEP 427.  In versions 0.46.1 and below, the unpack
function is vulnerable to file permission modification through
mishandling of file permissions after extraction.  The logic blindly
trusts the filename from the archive header for the chmod operation,
even though the extraction process itself might have sanitized the
path.  Attackers can craft a malicious wheel file that, when unpacked,
changes the permissions of critical system files (e.g., /etc/passwd,
SSH keys, config files), allowing for Privilege Escalation or
arbitrary code execution by modifying now-writable scripts.  This
issue has been fixed in version 0.46.2.</p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-24049</cvename>
      <url>https://cveawg.mitre.org/api/cve/CVE-2026-24049</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-01-22</discovery>
      <entry>2026-01-22</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="f8560c1b-f772-11f0-85c5-a8a1599412c6">
    <topic>chromium -- multiple security fixes</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
       <name>chromium</name>
       <range><lt>144.0.7559.96</lt></range>
      </package>
      <package>
       <name>ungoogled-chromium</name>
       <range><lt>144.0.7559.96</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
       <p>Chrome Releases reports:</p>
       <blockquote cite="https://chromereleases.googleblog.com/2026/01/stable-channel-update-for-desktop_20.html">
	 <p>This update includes 1 security fix:</p>
	 <ul>
	    <li>[473851441] High CVE-2026-1220: Race in V8. Reported by @p1nky4745 on 2026-01-07</li>
	 </ul>
       </blockquote>
      </body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-1220</cvename>
      <url>https://chromereleases.googleblog.com/2026/01/stable-channel-update-for-desktop_20.html</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-01-20</discovery>
      <entry>2026-01-22</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="61dc7f67-f6e5-11f0-b051-2cf05da270f3">
    <topic>Gitlab -- vulnerabilities</topic>
    <affects>
<package>
<name>gitlab-ce</name>
<name>gitlab-ee</name>
<range><ge>18.8.0</ge><lt>18.8.2</lt></range>
<range><ge>18.7.0</ge><lt>18.7.2</lt></range>
<range><ge>11.9.0</ge><lt>18.6.4</lt></range>
</package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>Gitlab reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://about.gitlab.com/releases/2026/01/21/patch-release-gitlab-18-8-2-released/">
	  <p>Denial of Service issue in Jira Connect integration impacts GitLab CE/EE</p>
	  <p>Incorrect Authorization issue in Releases API impacts GitLab CE/EE</p>
	  <p>Unchecked Return Value issue in authentication services impacts GitLab CE/EE</p>
	  <p>Infinite Loop issue in Wiki redirects impacts GitLab CE/EE</p>
	  <p>Denial of Service issue in API endpoint impacts GitLab CE/EE</p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2025-13927</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2025-13928</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-0723</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2025-13335</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-1102</cvename>
      <url>https://about.gitlab.com/releases/2026/01/21/patch-release-gitlab-18-8-2-released/</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-01-21</discovery>
      <entry>2026-01-21</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="01f34a27-f560-11f0-bbdc-10ffe07f9334">
    <topic>mail/mailpit -- multiple vulnerabilities</topic>
    <affects>
<package>
<name>mailpit</name>
<range><lt>1.28.3</lt></range>
</package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>Mailpit author reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://github.com/axllent/mailpit/releases/tag/v1.28.3">
	  <p>Ensure SMTP TO &amp; FROM addresses are RFC 5322
	  compliant and prevent header injection (GHSA-54wq-72mp-cq7c)</p>
	  <p>Prevent Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) via HTML
	  Check API (GHSA-6jxm-fv7w-rw5j)</p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-23829</cvename>
      <url>https://github.com/axllent/mailpit/security/advisories/GHSA-54wq-72mp-cq7c</url>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-23845</cvename>
      <url>https://github.com/axllent/mailpit/security/advisories/GHSA-6jxm-fv7w-rw5j</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-01-18</discovery>
      <entry>2026-01-19</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="fb561db9-0fc1-4d92-81a2-ee01839c9119">
    <topic>oauth2-proxy -- multiple vulnerabilities</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
	<name>oauth2-proxy</name>
	<range><lt>7.14.1</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>Within HostnameError.Error(), when constructing an error string, there is no limit to the number of hosts that will be printed out. Furthermore, the error string is constructed by repeated string concatenation, leading to quadratic runtime. Therefore, a certificate provided by a malicious actor can result in excessive resource consumption.</p>
	<p>A flaw was found in the crypto/x509 package in the Go standard library. This vulnerability allows a certificate validation bypass via an excluded subdomain constraint in a certificated chain as it does not restrict the usage of wildcard SANs in the leaf certificate.</p>
	<p>SSH Agent servers do not validate the size of messages when processing new identity requests, which may cause the program to panic if the message is malformed due to an out of bounds read.</p>
	<p>SSH servers parsing GSSAPI authentication requests do not validate the number of mechanisms specified in the request, allowing an attacker to cause unbounded memory consumption.</p>
      </body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2025-61729</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2025-61727</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2025-47914</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2025-58181</cvename>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-01-16</discovery>
      <entry>2026-01-18</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="ff20d3a3-f211-11f0-9ca3-b42e991fc52e">
    <topic>Mozilla -- multiple vulnerabilities</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
	<name>firefox</name>
	<range><lt>147.0.0,2</lt></range>
      </package>
      <package>
	<name>thunderbird</name>
	<range><lt>147.0.0</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>
	Memory safety bugs present in Firefox 146 and Thunderbird
	146. Some of these bugs showed evidence of memory corruption
	and we presume that with enough effort some of these could
	have been exploited to run arbitrary code.
	</p>
	<p>Denial-of-service in the DOM: Service Workers component.</p>
	<p>Information disclosure in the XML component.</p>
	<p>Sandbox escape in the Messaging System component.</p>
      </body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-0892</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-0889</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-0888</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-0881</cvename>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-01-13</discovery>
      <entry>2026-01-15</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="085101eb-f212-11f0-9ca3-b42e991fc52e">
    <topic>Mozilla -- multiple vulnerabilities</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
	<name>firefox</name>
	<range><lt>147.0.0,2</lt></range>
      </package>
      <package>
	<name>firefox-esr</name>
	<range><lt>140.7.0,2</lt></range>
      </package>
      <package>
	<name>thunderbird</name>
	<range><lt>147</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>Memory safety bugs present in firefox-esr 140.6,
	Thunderbird ESR 140.6, Firefox 146 and Thunderbird 146.</p>
	<p>Spoofing issue in the DOM: Copy &amp; Paste and Drag &amp;
	Drop component.</p>
	<p>Clickjacking issue and information disclosure in the PDF
	Viewer component.</p>
	<p>Use-after-free in the JavaScript: GC component.</p>
	<p>Use-after-free in the JavaScript Engine component.</p>
	<p>Information disclosure in the Networking component.</p>
	<p>Sandbox escape due to incorrect boundary conditions in the
	Graphics: CanvasWebGL component.</p>
      </body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-0891</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-0890</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-0887</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-0885</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-0884</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-0883</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-0878</cvename>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-01-13</discovery>
      <entry>2026-01-15</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="06061c59-f212-11f0-9ca3-b42e991fc52e">
    <topic>Mozilla -- multiple vulnerabilities</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
	<name>firefox</name>
	<range><lt>147.0.0,2</lt></range>
      </package>
      <package>
	<name>firefox-esr</name>
	<range><lt>140.7.0,2</lt></range>
      </package>
      <package>
	<name>thunderbird</name>
	<range><lt>147.0.0</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>Incorrect boundary conditions in the Graphics
	component.</p>
	<p>Use-after-free in the IPC component.</p>
	<p>Sandbox escape due to integer overflow in the Graphics
	component.</p>
	<p>Sandbox escape due to incorrect boundary conditions in the
	Graphics component.</p>
	<p>Mitigation bypass in the DOM: Security component.</p>
      </body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-0886</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-0882</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-0880</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-0879</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-0877</cvename>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-01-13</discovery>
      <entry>2026-01-15</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="6f76a1db-f124-11f0-85c5-a8a1599412c6">
    <topic>chromium -- multiple security fixes</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
       <name>chromium</name>
       <range><lt>144.0.7559.59</lt></range>
      </package>
      <package>
       <name>ungoogled-chromium</name>
       <range><lt>144.0.7559.59</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
       <p>Chrome Releases reports:</p>
       <blockquote cite="https://chromereleases.googleblog.com/2026/01/stable-channel-update-for-desktop_13.html">
	 <p>This update includes 10 security fixes:</p>
	 <ul>
	    <li>[458914193] High CVE-2026-0899: Out of bounds memory access in V8. Reported by @p1nky4745 on 2025-11-08</li>
	    <li>[465730465] High CVE-2026-0900: Inappropriate implementation in V8. Reported by Google on 2025-12-03</li>
	    <li>[40057499] High CVE-2026-0901: Inappropriate implementation in Blink. Reported by Irvan Kurniawan (sourc7) on 2021-10-04</li>
	    <li>[469143679] Medium CVE-2026-0902: Inappropriate implementation in V8. Reported by 303f06e3 on 2025-12-16</li>
	    <li>[444803530] Medium CVE-2026-0903: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Downloads. Reported by Azur on 2025-09-13</li>
	    <li>[452209495] Medium CVE-2026-0904: Incorrect security UI in Digital Credentials. Reported by Hafiizh on 2025-10-15</li>
	    <li>[465466773] Medium CVE-2026-0905: Insufficient policy enforcement in Network. Reported by Google on 2025-12-02</li>
	    <li>[467448811] Low CVE-2026-0906: Incorrect security UI. Reported by Khalil Zhani on 2025-12-10</li>
	    <li>[444653104] Low CVE-2026-0907: Incorrect security UI in Split View. Reported by Hafiizh on 2025-09-12</li>
	    <li>[452209503] Low CVE-2026-0908: Use after free in ANGLE. Reported by Glitchers BoB 14th. on 2025-10-15</li>
	 </ul>
       </blockquote>
      </body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-0899</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-0900</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-0901</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-0902</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-0903</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-0904</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-0905</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-0906</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-0907</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-0908</cvename>
      <url>https://chromereleases.googleblog.com/2026/01/stable-channel-update-for-desktop_13.html</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-01-13</discovery>
      <entry>2026-01-15</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="fd3855b8-efbc-11f0-9e3f-b0416f0c4c67">
    <topic>virtualenv -- CWE-59: Improper Link Resolution Before File Access ('Link Following')</topic>
    <affects>
    <package>
	<name>py310-virtualenv</name>
	<name>py311-virtualenv</name>
	<name>py312-virtualenv</name>
	<name>py313-virtualenv</name>
	<name>py313t-virtualenv</name>
	<name>py314-virtualenv</name>
	<range><lt>20.36.1</lt></range>
    </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>https://github.com/pypa/virtualenv/security/advisories/GHSA-597g-3phw-6986 reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://github.com/pypa/virtualenv/security/advisories/GHSA-597g-3phw-6986">
	  <p>virtualenv is a tool for creating isolated virtual python environments.
Prior to version 20.36.1, TOCTOU (Time-of-Check-Time-of-Use)
vulnerabilities in virtualenv allow local attackers to perform
symlink-based attacks on directory creation operations.  An attacker
with local access can exploit a race condition between directory
existence checks and creation to redirect virtualenv's app_data and
lock file operations to attacker-controlled locations.  This issue
has been patched in version 20.36.1.</p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-22702</cvename>
      <url>https://cveawg.mitre.org/api/cve/CVE-2026-22702</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-01-10</discovery>
      <entry>2026-01-12</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="7e63d0dd-eeff-11f0-b135-c01803b56cc4">
    <topic>libtasn1 -- Stack-based buffer overflow</topic>
    <affects>
<package>
<name>libtasn1</name>
<range><lt>4.21.0</lt></range>
</package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>oss-security@ list reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2026/01/08/5">
	<p>Stack-based buffer overflow in libtasn1 version: v4.20.0.
	The function fails to validate the size of input data resulting
	in a buffer overflow in asn1_expend_octet_string.</p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2025-13151</cvename>
      <url>https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-13151</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-01-07</discovery>
      <entry>2026-01-11</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="c9b610e9-eebc-11f0-b051-2cf05da270f3">
    <topic>Gitlab -- vulnerabilities</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
	<name>gitlab-ce</name>
	<name>gitlab-ee</name>
	<range><ge>18.7.0</ge><lt>18.7.1</lt></range>
	<range><ge>18.6.0</ge><lt>18.6.3</lt></range>
	<range><ge>8.3.0</ge><lt>18.5.5</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>Gitlab reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://about.gitlab.com/releases/2026/01/07/patch-release-gitlab-18-7-1-released/">
	  <p>Stored Cross-site Scripting issue in GitLab Flavored Markdown placeholders impacts GitLab CE/EE</p>
	  <p>Cross-site Scripting issue in Web IDE impacts GitLab CE/EE</p>
	  <p>Missing Authorization issue in Duo Workflows API impacts GitLab EE</p>
	  <p>Missing Authorization issue in AI GraphQL mutation impacts GitLab EE</p>
	  <p>Denial of Service issue in import functionality impacts GitLab CE/EE</p>
	  <p>Insufficient Access Control Granularity issue in GraphQL runnerUpdate mutation impacts GitLab CE/EE</p>
	  <p>Information Disclosure issue in Mermaid diagram rendering impacts GitLab CE/EE</p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2025-9222</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2025-13761</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2025-13772</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2025-13781</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2025-10569</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2025-11246</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2025-3950</cvename>
      <url>https://about.gitlab.com/releases/2026/01/07/patch-release-gitlab-18-7-1-released/</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-01-07</discovery>
      <entry>2026-01-11</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="d822839e-ee4f-11f0-b53e-0897988a1c07">
    <topic>mail/mailpit -- Cross-Site WebSocket Hijacking</topic>
    <affects>
<package>
<name>mailpit</name>
<range><lt>1.28.2</lt></range>
</package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>Mailpit author reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://github.com/axllent/mailpit/security/advisories/GHSA-524m-q5m7-79mm">
	  <p>The Mailpit WebSocket server is configured to accept
	  connections from any origin. This lack of Origin header
	  validation introduces a Cross-Site WebSocket Hijacking
	  (CSWSH) vulnerability.</p>

	  <p>An attacker can host a malicious website that, when
	  visited by a developer running Mailpit locally, establishes
	  a WebSocket connection to the victim's Mailpit instance
	  (default ws://localhost:8025). This allows the attacker
	  to intercept sensitive data such as email contents,
	  headers, and server statistics in real-time.</p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-22689</cvename>
      <url>https://github.com/axllent/mailpit/security/advisories/GHSA-524m-q5m7-79mm</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-01-10</discovery>
      <entry>2026-01-10</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="79c3c751-ee20-11f0-b17e-50ebf6bdf8e9">
    <topic>phpmyfaq -- multiple vulnerabilities</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
	<name>phpmyfaq-php82</name>
	<name>phpmyfaq-php83</name>
	<name>phpmyfaq-php84</name>
	<name>phpmyfaq-php85</name>
	<range><lt>4.0.16</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>phpMyFAQ team reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://www.phpmyfaq.de/security/advisory-2025-12-29/">
	  <p>Stored cross-site scripting (XSS) and unauthenticated config backup
	    download vulnerability</p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <url>https://www.phpmyfaq.de/security/advisory-2025-12-29/</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2025-12-29</discovery>
      <entry>2026-01-10</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="8826fb1c-ebd8-11f0-a15a-a8a1599412c6">
    <topic>chromium -- multiple security fixes</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
       <name>chromium</name>
       <range><lt>143.0.7499.192</lt></range>
      </package>
      <package>
       <name>ungoogled-chromium</name>
       <range><lt>143.0.7499.192</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
       <p>Chrome Releases reports:</p>
       <blockquote cite="https://chromereleases.googleblog.com/2026/01/stable-channel-update-for-desktop.html">
	 <p>This update includes 1 security fix:</p>
	 <ul>
	    <li>[463155954] High CVE-2026-0628: Insufficient policy enforcement in WebView tag. Reported by Gal Weizman on 2025-11-23</li>
	 </ul>
       </blockquote>
      </body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-0628</cvename>
      <url>https://chromereleases.googleblog.com/2026/01/stable-channel-update-for-desktop.html</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-01-06</discovery>
      <entry>2026-01-07</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="583b63f5-ebae-11f0-939f-47e3830276dd">
	  <topic>security/libsodium -- crypto_core_ed25519_is_valid_point mishandles checks for whether an elliptic curve point is valid</topic>
    <affects>
<package>
<name>libsodium</name>
<range><lt>1.0.21</lt></range>
</package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>Libsodium maintainer reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://00f.net/2025/12/30/libsodium-vulnerability/">
	  <p>The function crypto_core_ed25519_is_valid_point(), a low-level function
	  used to check if a given elliptic curve point is valid, was supposed to
	  reject points that aren't in the main cryptographic group,
	  but some points were slipping through.</p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2025-69277</cvename>
      <url>https://00f.net/2025/12/30/libsodium-vulnerability/</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2025-12-30</discovery>
      <entry>2026-01-07</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="df33c83b-eb4f-11f0-a46f-0897988a1c07">
    <topic>mail/mailpit -- Server-Side Request Forgery</topic>
    <affects>
<package>
<name>mailpit</name>
<range><lt>1.28.1</lt></range>
</package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>Mailpit author reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://github.com/axllent/mailpit/security/advisories/GHSA-8v65-47jx-7mfr">
	  <p>A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability
	  exists in Mailpit's /proxy endpoint that allows attackers
	  to make requests to internal network resources.</p>
	  <p>The /proxy endpoint allows requests to internal network
	  resources. While it validates http:// and https:// schemes,
	  it does not block internal IP addresses, allowing attackers
	  to access internal services and APIs.</p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2026-21859</cvename>
      <url>https://github.com/axllent/mailpit/security/advisories/GHSA-8v65-47jx-7mfr</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2026-01-06</discovery>
      <entry>2026-01-06</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="e2cd20fd-eb10-11f0-a1c0-0050569f0b83">
    <topic>net-mgmt/net-snmp -- Remote Code Execution (snmptrapd)</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
	<name>net-snmp</name>
	<range><lt>5.9.5,1</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>net-snmp development team reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://github.com/net-snmp/net-snmp/security/advisories/GHSA-4389-rwqf-q9gq">
	  <p>A specially crafted packet to an net-snmp snmptrapd daemon can cause a buffer overflow and
	   the daemon to crash.</p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2025-68615</cvename>
      <url>https://github.com/net-snmp/net-snmp/security/advisories/GHSA-4389-rwqf-q9gq</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2025-12-23</discovery>
      <entry>2026-01-06</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="500cc49c-e93b-11f0-b8d8-4ccc6adda413">
    <topic>gstreamer1-plugins-bad -- Out-of-bounds reads in MIDI parser</topic>
    <affects>
<package>
<name>gstreamer1-plugins-bad</name>
<range><lt>1.26.10</lt></range>
</package>
    </affects>
    <description>
	<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	<p>The GStreamer Security Center reports:</p>
	<blockquote cite="https://gstreamer.freedesktop.org/security/sa-2025-0009.html">
	  <p>Multiple out-of-bounds reads in the MIDI parser that can cause
	  crashes for certain input files.</p>
	</blockquote>
	</body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CVE-2025-67326</cvename>
      <cvename>CVE-2025-67327</cvename>
      <url>https://gstreamer.freedesktop.org/security/sa-2025-0009.html</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2025-12-27</discovery>
      <entry>2026-01-04</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>
